25.12.2014 Views

RCGP-2014-poster-abstracts

RCGP-2014-poster-abstracts

RCGP-2014-poster-abstracts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P022 <br />

General practitioners’ views on barriers to diagnosing dementia <br />

Anita Chithiramohan; Steve Iliffe; Iram Khattak <br />

University College London <br />

Introduction: Dementia is of increasing clinical relevance in an ageing population but diagnosis rates are <br />

comparatively low. Several studies have identified barriers leading to missed or delayed diagnosis but all were <br />

conducted before recent NHS campaigns specifically targeting the under-­‐diagnosis of dementia. As the first point of <br />

contact for patients with suspected dementia, General Practitioners (GPs) are well placed to understand barriers to <br />

diagnosis. <br />

Aim: To explore GPs’ opinions concerning barriers to diagnosing dementia, in light of recent NHS campaigns. <br />

Design and setting: A qualitative study was undertaken across 2 culturally diverse cities in England. A total of 13 GPs <br />

were interviewed, with 9 individual and 2 group interviews. <br />

Methods: In-­‐depth, semi-­‐structured interviews were conducted face-­‐to-­‐face. Interviews were audiotaped and <br />

transcribed verbatim. Data was analysed independently by 2 investigators using the framework approach and <br />

thematic analysis. <br />

Results: GPs’ reported barriers previously unidentified in the literature, barriers that appear to be consistent with <br />

the literature, as well as barriers that contradicted previous findings. There were 4 major themes: organisational <br />

factors (time constraints, diagnostic tools, primary-­‐secondary care interface, funding, treatability), clinician-­‐related <br />

factors (special interest, doctor-­‐patient relationship), patient-­‐related factors (patient awareness, family, stigma) and <br />

societal influences (cultural factors). <br />

Conclusion: General practitioners perceived recent NHS campaigns to improve dementia diagnosis to be successful <br />

overall in raising awareness of dementia, but identified barriers faced by practicing clinicians in the current <br />

healthcare system. These findings warrant reflection and further investigation. <br />

P023 <br />

Can early diagnosis improve dementia care <br />

Halima Choonara; Lovereet Gill <br />

University of Manchester <br />

Aims: With increasing prevalence and awareness of dementia as a public health concern there is a need to improve <br />

the quality of management of dementia. This presentation will look at the management of dementia in primary care, <br />

with specific focus on the benefit of diagnosing dementia early. <br />

Content: The presentation will include findings from a literature review on the current management of dementia, <br />

supported by results from an audit on the time between presentation of dementia symptoms and formal diagnosis. <br />

Relevance: The estimated cost to the UK of dementia care in 2013 was £23 billion. With the awareness of dementia <br />

as a public health concern increasing there has been much interest in improving the quality and efficiency of care <br />

provided. In 2009 the Department of Health (DOH) issued a report entitled ‘Living well with dementia, a National <br />

Dementia Strategy’, which promoted timely diagnosis as a key part of improving dementia care. <br />

Discussion: Results from the audit found on average a 19 month delay between symptom presentation and <br />

diagnosis. Barriers to diagnosis exist from both patients and practitioners that can be attributed to this. While there <br />

is a lack of quantitative data to support the benefits of early diagnosis, current expert opinion is that early diagnosis <br />

can optimise overall care. <br />

Outcome: It appears there is a reluctance to diagnose dementia early. However, early diagnosis is a notion <br />

supported by the DOH and the Wold Alzheimer’s Report 2011 that could prove pivotal in improving dementia care <br />

and outcomes. <br />

P024 <br />

Polypharmacy review in a Medway nursing home <br />

Harkiran Sohal; Chidambaram Balachander; Sanjay Suman <br />

Borstal Village Surgery; Medway NHS Foundation Trust <br />

Aims and objective: To identify residents with polypharmacy (≥4 medications), any adverse drug reactions (ADR) <br />

noted and whether a formal medication review was performed in the last 6 months. <br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!