Optimisation in CT - CT users group

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Effective justification Is there a case for using non-radiation tests in the first instance? Irrespective of sensitivity? Pre-radiation screening? Is this compatible with British health care?
“Black Bone” MRI Can MRI replace CT? In what circumstances is the greater resolution of CT for cortical bone essential to management?
Page 1 and 2:
A case for shared approach Optimisa
Page 3 and 4:
Body CT 2007 Submillimetre sections
Page 5 and 6:
Impact of new technique Tasks perfo
Page 7 and 8:
Clinical Benefits of MSCT: new appl
Page 9:
CT angiography
Page 12 and 13: Clinical benefits of MDCT Multiphas
Page 14 and 15: Acute Appendicitis: effect of incre
Page 16 and 17: Skull Limbs Chest Abdomen IVU Lumba
Page 18 and 19: Mettler at al, 2001 11% of examinat
Page 20 and 21: N o o f p a ts 140 120 100 80 60 40
Page 22 and 23: JRH cases over 1000 mGy-cm Brain 17
Page 25 and 26: Is this the age of imaging over-kil
Page 27 and 28: EC Directive 97/43 Justification Op
Page 29 and 30: Automatic Exposure Control (AEC)
Page 31 and 32: Modifying the examination • Exten
Page 33 and 34: Modifying exposure CT of the chest:
Page 37 and 38: Image quality Im age quality 4.5 4.
Page 39 and 40: New work: Cervical and Lumbar Spine
Page 41 and 42: Fracture Image
Page 43 and 44: Experiment 2: dose reduction in the
Page 46 and 47: 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 10 20 30 40 Scores,
Page 48 and 49: Experiment 2: preliminary conclusio
Page 50 and 51: CT working group - 4 th Framework
Page 52 and 53: 14 applications 53 institutions 8 c
Page 54 and 55: Effective dose, mSv 30 25 20 15 10
Page 56 and 57: 6 th Framework Programme Prospectiv
Page 58 and 59: Justification in Optimisation • E
Page 60 and 61: Delayed diagnosis: ultra-low dose 1
Page 66: Volume acquisition Acquisition time
Page 72 and 73: The Future More evidence is needed
show all

Optimisation in CT - CT users group

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?