25.12.2014 Views

Chapter 27 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom

Chapter 27 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom

Chapter 27 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>27</strong><br />

<strong>Early</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Models</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Atom</strong>


<strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>27</strong><br />

• Discovery <strong>and</strong> Properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Electron<br />

• Planck’s <strong>Quantum</strong> Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>and</strong><br />

Blackbody Radiation<br />

• Photon <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> Light <strong>and</strong><br />

Photoelectric Effect<br />

• Energy, Mass, <strong>and</strong> Momentum <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Photon<br />

• Compton Effect<br />

• Photon Interactions; Pair Production


<strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>27</strong><br />

• Wave­Particle Duality;<br />

<strong>the</strong> Principle <strong>of</strong> Complementarity<br />

• Wave Nature <strong>of</strong> Matter<br />

• Electron Microscopes<br />

• <strong>Early</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Atom</strong><br />

• <strong>Atom</strong>ic Spectra:<br />

Key to <strong>the</strong> Structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Atom</strong><br />

• The Bohr Model<br />

• de Broglie’s Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis Applied to <strong>Atom</strong>s


Discovery <strong>and</strong> Properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Electron<br />

“Cathode rays” were discovered in late 1800’s <strong>and</strong><br />

found to be deflected by electric or magnetic fields in<br />

ways that implied particles with a negative charge.


Discovery <strong>and</strong> Properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Electron<br />

By accelerating <strong>the</strong> rays through a known potential<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n measuring <strong>the</strong> radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir path in a<br />

known magnetic field, <strong>the</strong> charge to mass ratio was<br />

measured:<br />

(<strong>27</strong>­1)<br />

The result is


Discovery <strong>and</strong> Properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Electron<br />

The currently accepted value <strong>of</strong> e is:<br />

Knowing e <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> e/m ratio allows <strong>the</strong> electron’s<br />

mass to be calculated. Result is


Planck’s <strong>Quantum</strong> Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>and</strong><br />

Blackbody Radiation<br />

All objects emit radiation whose total intensity is<br />

proportional to <strong>the</strong> fourth power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir temperature.<br />

This is called <strong>the</strong>rmal radiation; a “blackbody” emits<br />

only <strong>the</strong>rmal radiation.<br />

The spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

blackbody radiation<br />

is in this figure for a<br />

few temperatures.<br />

The frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

peak intensity<br />

increases linearly<br />

with temperature.


Planck’s <strong>Quantum</strong> Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>and</strong><br />

Blackbody Radiation<br />

This spectrum could not be reproduced using <strong>the</strong><br />

physics known in <strong>the</strong> late 19 th ­ century.<br />

A solution was proposed by Max Planck in 1900:<br />

The energy <strong>of</strong> oscillations within atoms cannot have<br />

an arbitrary value; it is related to <strong>the</strong> frequency:<br />

The constant h is now called Planck’s constant.


Planck’s <strong>Quantum</strong> Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>and</strong><br />

Blackbody Radiation<br />

Planck found <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> this constant by fitting<br />

blackbody curves for a number <strong>of</strong> temperatures<br />

Planck’s proposal was that <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>of</strong> an<br />

oscillation had to be an integral multiple <strong>of</strong> hf.<br />

This is called <strong>the</strong> quantization <strong>of</strong> energy.


Photon <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> Light <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Photoelectric Effect<br />

Einstein suggested that ,given <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> Planck’s<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory, light must be emitted in small energy packets:<br />

These tiny packets <strong>of</strong> energy are like a particle<br />

<strong>and</strong> are called photons.<br />

So is light a wave or a particle


Photon <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> Light <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Photoelectric Effect<br />

Evidence for Particle<br />

­The photoelectric<br />

effect: When light strikes<br />

a metal, electrons are<br />

emitted. But, this effect<br />

does not occur if <strong>the</strong><br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> light is<br />

too low. The kinetic<br />

energy <strong>of</strong> an electron<br />

increases with frequency.


Photon <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> Light <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Photoelectric Effect<br />

If light is a wave, <strong>the</strong>ory predicts:<br />

• Number <strong>of</strong> electrons <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir energy should<br />

increase with intensity<br />

• Frequency would not matter<br />

• Also one can get Interference <strong>and</strong> Diffraction<br />

from waves but not from particles


Photon <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> Light <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Photoelectric Effect<br />

If light is made up <strong>of</strong> particles, <strong>the</strong>ory predicts:<br />

• Increasing intensity increases number <strong>of</strong><br />

electrons but not energy<br />

• Above a minimum energy required to break<br />

atomic bond, kinetic energy will increase linearly<br />

with frequency<br />

• There is a cut<strong>of</strong>f frequency below which no<br />

electrons will be emitted, regardless <strong>of</strong> intensity


Photon <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> Light <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Photoelectric Effect<br />

The particle <strong>the</strong>ory assumes that an electron<br />

absorbs a single photon with energy hf.<br />

Plotting <strong>the</strong> kinetic energy vs. frequency:<br />

This shows clear<br />

agreement with <strong>the</strong><br />

photon <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>and</strong><br />

not with wave<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory.


Energy, Mass, <strong>and</strong> Momentum <strong>of</strong> a Photon<br />

Clearly, a photon must travel at <strong>the</strong> speed <strong>of</strong> light.<br />

Looking at <strong>the</strong> relativistic equation for momentum,<br />

From relativity it is clear that this can only happen<br />

if a photon’s rest mass is zero<br />

We already know that <strong>the</strong> energy is hf; we can put<br />

this in <strong>the</strong> relativistic energy ­ momentum relation<br />

<strong>and</strong> find <strong>the</strong> momentum:


The Compton Effect<br />

Compton scattered X­rays from different materials.<br />

He found that <strong>the</strong> scattered X­rays had a slightly<br />

longer wavelength than <strong>the</strong> incident ones, <strong>and</strong> that<br />

<strong>the</strong> wavelength depended on <strong>the</strong> scattering angle:


The Compton Effect<br />

This is ano<strong>the</strong>r effect that is correctly predicted by<br />

<strong>the</strong> photon model <strong>and</strong> not by <strong>the</strong> wave model.


Photon Interactions <strong>and</strong> Pair Production<br />

Photons passing through matter can undergo <strong>the</strong><br />

following interactions:<br />

• Photoelectric effect: photon is completely<br />

absorbed, electron is ejected<br />

• Photon may be totally absorbed by electron, but<br />

not have enough energy to eject it; <strong>the</strong> electron<br />

moves into an excited state<br />

• The photon can scatter from an atom <strong>and</strong> lose<br />

some energy<br />

• The photon can produce an electron­positron pair.


Photon Interactions <strong>and</strong> Pair Production<br />

In pair production, energy, electric charge, <strong>and</strong><br />

momentum must all be conserved.<br />

Energy will be conserved<br />

through <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>and</strong> kinetic<br />

energy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electron <strong>and</strong><br />

positron; <strong>the</strong>ir opposite charges<br />

conserve charge; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

interaction must take place in<br />

<strong>the</strong> electromagnetic field <strong>of</strong> a<br />

nucleus, which can contribute<br />

momentum.


Wave­Particle Duality<br />

The Principle <strong>of</strong> Complementarity<br />

We have phenomena such as diffraction <strong>and</strong><br />

interference that show that light is a wave, <strong>and</strong><br />

phenomena such as <strong>the</strong> photoelectric effect <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Compton effect that show that it is a particle.<br />

How do we decide which one it actually is<br />

The question has no answer one way or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r !<br />

We must accept <strong>the</strong> dual wave­particle nature <strong>of</strong> light<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> experimental results.<br />

So, are what we think <strong>of</strong> as particles also waves


Wave­Particle Duality<br />

The Principle <strong>of</strong> Complementarity<br />

The principle <strong>of</strong> complementarity states that both<br />

<strong>the</strong> wave <strong>and</strong> particle aspects <strong>of</strong> light are<br />

fundamental to its nature.<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r we “see” waves or particles is just our<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> how light behaves in various types<br />

<strong>of</strong> measurements – based on an incomplete <strong>the</strong>ory.


Wave Nature <strong>of</strong> Matter<br />

Just as light sometimes behaves as a particle,<br />

matter sometimes behaves like a wave.<br />

The wavelength <strong>of</strong> a particle <strong>of</strong> matter is also<br />

This wavelength is extraordinarily small for any<br />

object that has any significant mass, but<br />

becomes more important for very light particles<br />

such as an electron. Electrons show <strong>the</strong> same<br />

diffraction from crystals as found for x­rays.


Electron Microscopes<br />

The wavelength <strong>of</strong> electrons will vary with energy,<br />

but is still quite short. This makes electrons useful<br />

for imaging – remember that <strong>the</strong> smallest object<br />

that can be resolved is about one wavelength.<br />

Electrons used in electron microscopes have<br />

wavelengths <strong>of</strong> about 0.004 nm.<br />

This means it is possible to “see” an individual<br />

atom with some electron based techniques


Electron Microscopes<br />

Transmission<br />

electron microscope<br />

<strong>the</strong> electrons are first<br />

accelerated by a<br />

potential difference<br />

before encountering<br />

<strong>the</strong> object,<br />

<strong>and</strong> are focused by<br />

a magnetic “lens”<br />

to form <strong>the</strong> image.


Electron Microscopes<br />

Scanning electron<br />

microscope –<br />

<strong>the</strong> electron beam is<br />

scanned back <strong>and</strong><br />

forth across <strong>the</strong><br />

object to be imaged


Electron Microscopes<br />

Scanning tunneling microscope – up <strong>and</strong> down<br />

motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probe keeps <strong>the</strong> current constant.<br />

Plotting that motion<br />

produces an image<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface.


<strong>Early</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Atom</strong><br />

It was known that atoms were electrically neutral, but<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y could become charged, implying that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

were positive <strong>and</strong> negative charges <strong>and</strong> that some <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m could be removed.<br />

A popular atomic model was<br />

this “plum­pudding” model:


<strong>Early</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Atom</strong><br />

Ru<strong>the</strong>rford did an experiment ­ now known as<br />

Ru<strong>the</strong>rford scattering ­ that showed that <strong>the</strong><br />

positively charged nucleus must be extremely<br />

small compared to <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atom.<br />

He scattered alpha particles – helium nuclei – from<br />

a metal foil <strong>and</strong> observed <strong>the</strong> scattering angle. He<br />

found that some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> angles were far larger than<br />

<strong>the</strong> plum­pudding model would allow. The<br />

expanation was that <strong>the</strong> positively charged region<br />

had to be tiny compared to <strong>the</strong> atoms overall size.


Ru<strong>the</strong>rford Scattering Experiment<br />

The only way to account for <strong>the</strong> large angles was to<br />

assume that all <strong>the</strong> positive charge was contained<br />

within a tiny volume – now we know that <strong>the</strong> radius<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nucleus<br />

is 1/10000 that<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atom.


<strong>Early</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Atom</strong><br />

Therefore, Ru<strong>the</strong>rford’s<br />

model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atom is<br />

mostly empty space:<br />

Problem: accelerated<br />

electron should radiate<br />

all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time if moving<br />

in circular motion.


<strong>Atom</strong>ic Spectra: Key to <strong>Atom</strong>’s Structure<br />

A very thin gas heated in a discharge tube emits<br />

light only at characteristic frequencies.


<strong>Atom</strong>ic Spectra Provided <strong>the</strong> Key to <strong>the</strong><br />

Structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Atom</strong><br />

An atomic spectrum is a line spectrum – only<br />

certain frequencies appear. If white light passes<br />

through such a gas, it absorbs at those same<br />

frequencies.


<strong>Atom</strong>ic Spectra: Key to <strong>Atom</strong>’s Structure<br />

The wavelengths <strong>of</strong> electrons emitted from hydrogen<br />

have a regular pattern:<br />

This is called <strong>the</strong> Balmer series. R is <strong>the</strong> Rydberg<br />

constant:


<strong>Atom</strong>ic Spectra: Key to <strong>Atom</strong>’s Structure<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r series include <strong>the</strong> Lyman series:<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Paschen series:


<strong>Atom</strong>ic Spectra: Key to <strong>Atom</strong>’s Structure<br />

A portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complete spectrum <strong>of</strong> hydrogen is<br />

shown here. The lines cannot be explained by <strong>the</strong><br />

Ru<strong>the</strong>rford <strong>the</strong>ory without some extra constraints.


The Bohr Model <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Atom</strong><br />

Bohr proposed that <strong>the</strong> possible energy states for<br />

atomic electrons were quantized – only certain<br />

values were possible. Then <strong>the</strong> spectrum could be<br />

explained as transitions from one level to ano<strong>the</strong>r.


The Bohr Model <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Atom</strong><br />

Bohr also found that <strong>the</strong> angular momentum<br />

was quantized in an orbital picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atom:


The Bohr Model <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Atom</strong><br />

An electron is held in orbit by <strong>the</strong> Coulomb force:


The Bohr <strong>Atom</strong><br />

Using <strong>the</strong> Coulomb force, one can easily calculate<br />

<strong>the</strong> radii <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orbits:


The Bohr Model <strong>of</strong> a Hydrogen <strong>Atom</strong><br />

The lowest energy level is<br />

called <strong>the</strong> ground state;<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs are excited<br />

states.


de Broglie’s Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis Applied to <strong>Atom</strong>s<br />

De Broglie’s hypo<strong>the</strong>sis is <strong>the</strong> one associating a<br />

wavelength with <strong>the</strong> momentum <strong>of</strong> a particle.<br />

He proposed that only those orbits where <strong>the</strong> wave<br />

would be a circular st<strong>and</strong>ing wave will occur. This<br />

yields <strong>the</strong> same relation that Bohr had proposed.<br />

These ideas are <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> current underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> electronic structure <strong>of</strong> an atom but did not yet<br />

incorporate <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> electronic wavefunctions.<br />

They did have <strong>the</strong> energy & angular momentum<br />

properly quantized – that’s why <strong>the</strong>y work so well.


de Broglie’s Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis Applied to<br />

<strong>Atom</strong>s in Bohr’s Model<br />

These are circular<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ing waves for<br />

n = 2, 3, <strong>and</strong> 5.<br />

Explains why electrons<br />

do not radiate, as one<br />

expects from an<br />

accelerating charge.<br />

Emission occurs only<br />

for a state change, ∆n


Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>27</strong><br />

• Planck’s hypo<strong>the</strong>sis to explain blackbody spectrum:<br />

molecular oscillation energies are quantized<br />

• Light can be considered to consist <strong>of</strong> photons,<br />

each <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

• Photoelectric effect: incident photons knock<br />

electrons out <strong>of</strong> material when incident light<br />

is above some threshold frequency


Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>27</strong><br />

• Compton effect <strong>and</strong> pair production also support<br />

photon <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

• Wave­particle duality – both light <strong>and</strong> matter have<br />

both wave <strong>and</strong> particle properties<br />

• The de Broglie wavelength <strong>of</strong> an object:


Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>27</strong><br />

• Principle <strong>of</strong> complementarity: both wave <strong>and</strong><br />

particle properties are necessary for complete<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

• Ru<strong>the</strong>rford showed that atom has tiny nucleus<br />

• Line spectra are explained by electrons having<br />

only certain specific orbits L is quantized<br />

• Ground state has <strong>the</strong> lowest energy; <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs are<br />

called excited states

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!