25.12.2014 Views

SonicScope The Next Generation of Sonic While Drilling - FESAus

SonicScope The Next Generation of Sonic While Drilling - FESAus

SonicScope The Next Generation of Sonic While Drilling - FESAus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Next</strong> <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Sonic</strong> <strong>While</strong> <strong>Drilling</strong><br />

Meretta Qleibo<br />

LWD Petrophysics Domain Champion


Agenda<br />

─Quadrupole: Why and How<br />

─Introduction to <strong>Sonic</strong> Scope<br />

─Local Example<br />

─Summary<br />

2


Why Multipole Why <strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong><br />

─ Goal<br />

• Provide high data quality in real time<br />

• Deliver a robust compressional and shear measurement for all<br />

formations, irrespective <strong>of</strong> mud type<br />

─ Obtaining reliable compressional and shear provides<br />

• Pore pressure trends<br />

• Borehole stability analysis<br />

• Gas detection/saturation<br />

• Advanced drilling optimization/fracture gradient<br />

• Advanced formation evaluation<br />

3


From Monopole to Multipole<br />

2008<br />

onwards<br />

<strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong><br />

• Multipole tool<br />

• Vp & Vs in all formations<br />

• Enhanced real-time delivery<br />

• Stoneley<br />

2004-<br />

2008<br />

sonicVISION<br />

• Monopole tool<br />

• Enhanced real-time delivery<br />

• Vp & Vs in “fast” formations<br />

1996<br />

iSONIC<br />

• First LWD sonic tool<br />

• Monopole tool<br />

• Vp only<br />

4


Review <strong>of</strong> Borehole Acoustic Modes<br />

Monopole<br />

Dipole<br />

Quadrupole<br />

5


Dispersive Waves, Flexural and Quadrupole Modes<br />

─ Slowness <strong>of</strong> the wave varies with frequency<br />

Dipole flexural<br />

Quadrupole<br />

Stoneley wave<br />

Dipole flexural<br />

wave<br />

Quadrupole wave<br />

6


Why Quadrupole and Not Dipoles for LWD<br />

Wireline dipole<br />

Wireline tool<br />

Drill Collar<br />

LWD quadrupole<br />

dipole<br />

Slowness<br />

Wireline<br />

tool flexural<br />

No interference<br />

Borehole flexural<br />

Formation shear<br />

Fast collar<br />

flexural mode<br />

Slowness<br />

Borehole<br />

quadrupole<br />

Strong<br />

Coupling<br />

Collar quadrupole<br />

Collar<br />

flexural<br />

Frequency<br />

Borehole<br />

flexural mode<br />

Frequency<br />

7


<strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong> 825 – Key Technologies<br />

Dual Layer Quadrupole Transmitter<br />

• High power to excite Quadrupole in slow formations<br />

• Situated close to the receiver section to overcome attenuation<br />

“G42” Receiver Belts<br />

• 12 levels spaced at 90 degrees, 48 receivers total<br />

• Industry best 4” inter-receiver spacing, aliasing completely eliminated<br />

• Signal digitized at the receiver enables faster downhole processing<br />

• 4 bulkheads vs. 28 for QBAT = stronger collar, simpler acoustic modeling<br />

Screw on Centralizers<br />

Optimized Attenuation Section<br />

• Ensure mode purity<br />

• Wellsite Changeable<br />

• Hard Faced<br />

• Monopole collar arrival suppressed as low as possible<br />

• I.D. optimized to separate QP propagation modes<br />

• Enables Automatic Labeling, STC threshold<br />

8


Quadrupole Shear Inversion<br />

─ Model-Based Inversion<br />

• Dispersive approach<br />

• Account for tool presence effect<br />

─ Tool Presence<br />

• Tool equivalent model<br />

• Includes all tool details<br />

─ Quadrupole Inversion Methodology<br />

• Homogeneous Isotropic model<br />

• Tool equivalent model<br />

• Maximizing the semblance<br />

Slowness (us/ft)<br />

Slowness (us/ft)<br />

Modeled Quadrupole Mode<br />

Borehole <br />

quadrupole mode<br />

Mode Search<br />

RZX Modeling<br />

Note: Size <strong>of</strong> the dots indicate energy<br />

Frequency (kHz)<br />

Shear value<br />

Real Quadrupole Data<br />

Measured Data<br />

Model HI<br />

Shear value<br />

Frequency (kHz)<br />

9


Local Data Review – <strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong>825<br />

• North West Shelf well<br />

• 12 ¼” hole section, near vertical<br />

• Fast and slow formations<br />

• Wireline logging suite included <strong>Sonic</strong> Scanner<br />

10


Real Time Operations<br />

DTCO, DTSM<br />

(RT)<br />

40 us/ft 240<br />

• Compressional delivered in real time<br />

P<br />

P<br />

S<br />

• Coherency plot and pumps <strong>of</strong>f transmitted to<br />

enable QC <strong>of</strong> the data<br />

• Pumps <strong>of</strong>f test performed every stand<br />

• Real time applications include seismic tie ins,<br />

pore pressure modeling and geomechanics<br />

11


Data analysis <strong>of</strong> high-frequency monopole<br />

P<br />

S<br />

Stoneley<br />

Fast<br />

Formation<br />

P S St<br />

St<br />

S<br />

P<br />

Slow<br />

Formation<br />

P<br />

St<br />

St<br />

P<br />

12


Data analysis <strong>of</strong> high-frequency monopole<br />

Fast<br />

Formation<br />

P S St<br />

St<br />

St<br />

S<br />

S<br />

P<br />

P<br />

S<br />

Slow<br />

Formation<br />

P<br />

St<br />

St<br />

St<br />

P<br />

P<br />

P<br />

13


Shear from Quadrupole Inversion<br />

Homogeneous Isotropic<br />

Quadrupole dispersion curve<br />

Shear slowness<br />

14


<strong>Sonic</strong> Scanner Comparison<br />

Fast Formation, Monopole<br />

LWD<br />

(RT)<br />

LWD<br />

(REC)<br />

WL<br />

• Comparison between <strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong> Real<br />

time, memory data, and <strong>Sonic</strong> Scanner<br />

log (Monopole only)<br />

• Memory data from <strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong> and <strong>Sonic</strong><br />

Scanner show excellent agreement<br />

• Real Time data quality is as good as<br />

memory mode data<br />

• Shear data is available in Real Time from<br />

Monopole only (fast formations)<br />

15


<strong>Sonic</strong> Scanner Comparison<br />

Slow Formation, Monopole<br />

LWD<br />

(RT)<br />

LWD<br />

(REC)<br />

WL<br />

• Comparison between <strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong> 825<br />

Real time, memory data, and <strong>Sonic</strong><br />

Scanner log (Monopole only)<br />

• Monopole data in slow formation will not give<br />

shear if Shear DT > Mud DT<br />

• Compressional from Monopole approaching<br />

mud DT requires Leaky-P processing<br />

16


<strong>Sonic</strong> Scanner Comparison<br />

Slow Formation, Quadrupole<br />

LWD<br />

Quadrupole<br />

WL Dipole<br />

• <strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong> Quadrupole shear shows an<br />

excellent match to <strong>Sonic</strong> Scanner Dipole<br />

shear<br />

• Shear DT acquired up to 540 us/ft<br />

17


Summary<br />

• <strong>Sonic</strong> Scope service is now available in 4.75” and<br />

8.25” collars<br />

• Robust compressional delivered to client in real time<br />

• High quality waveforms enable data analysis and QC<br />

• Excellent Agreement between <strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong> and<br />

Wireline <strong>Sonic</strong> Scanner<br />

18


<strong><strong>Sonic</strong>Scope</strong><br />

─ Latest Schlumberger <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Real-Time LWD <strong>Sonic</strong><br />

─ High Quality Monopole Data<br />

─ Multipole Capability<br />

─ Available in 4.75” and 8.25” collars<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!