26.12.2014 Views

Jimmy Joyce - Society of Actuaries in Ireland

Jimmy Joyce - Society of Actuaries in Ireland

Jimmy Joyce - Society of Actuaries in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regulation – Revolution or<br />

Reformation<br />

<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Actuaries</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ireland</strong><br />

24 April 2002<br />

J <strong>Joyce</strong>


The Chang<strong>in</strong>g Regulatory Scene<br />

<strong>in</strong> Life Assurance<br />

• National<br />

Unified Supervision <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services<br />

• EU ) F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• International ) Solvency Supervision<br />

• Impact on Life Assurance Regulation


Central Bank and F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services<br />

Authority Bill 2002<br />

• McDowell Report<br />

• <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Actuaries</strong>’ Views<br />

• Monetary Functions / F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services Supervision<br />

• Prudential / Market Supervision


Irish F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services Regulatory<br />

Authority<br />

• Structure<br />

• Unified Supervision <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services<br />

• Bank<strong>in</strong>g and Insurance – Contrast<br />

• Regulatory Style – Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Based or Risk Based<br />

• Lessons from British F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services Authority<br />

• Implications for Life Assurance Supervision


Present Basis <strong>of</strong> Life Assurance Regulation<br />

• F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Solvency Supervision<br />

• Modified Statutory<br />

• Deferral and Match<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Income and Expenditure based<br />

• EU Life Directives<br />

• Market Value <strong>of</strong> Assets<br />

• Diversification & Admissibility<br />

Rules<br />

• Prudent Valuation <strong>of</strong> Liabilities<br />

• Prudential Marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

• Solvency Marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Input<br />

Auditor<br />

Appo<strong>in</strong>ted Actuary<br />

Why Change


Why Change <br />

• F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Understandable / relevant/ reliable<br />

Comparable across<br />

– time<br />

– companies<br />

– <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

Is Insurance Special <br />

To Reflect Reality<br />

- Market Based<br />

- Balance Sheet Based<br />

• Solvency Supervision<br />

To Reflect Reality<br />

- Based on F<strong>in</strong>ancial Reports<br />

- Transparent Capital Adequacy<br />

- Risk Based Capital<br />

Consequences<br />

- Pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

- Volatility


F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• All listed EU Companies to use International F<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

Report<strong>in</strong>g Standards (IFRS) by 2005<br />

– <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>surers and banks<br />

– EU regulations by end 2002<br />

– International Account<strong>in</strong>g Standards Board (IASB)<br />

project on Insurance Account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Draft statement <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples 2001<br />

Exposure Draft 2002 <br />

F<strong>in</strong>al Draft 2003 <br />

Implementation 2005


Fair Value<br />

Fair Value is the amount for which an asset could be<br />

exchanged or a liability settled between knowledgeable,<br />

will<strong>in</strong>g parties <strong>in</strong> an arms length transaction.<br />

Why Fair Value <br />

Account<strong>in</strong>g rather than actuarial<br />

Account<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples - understandability, relevance,<br />

reliability,comparability.<br />

Actuarial Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples - asset/liability approach<br />

- market based assessment


Issues for Long Term Insurance<br />

– Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>surance contract<br />

– Optionality <strong>in</strong> benefits<br />

– Dependence <strong>of</strong> benefits on assets held<br />

– Allowance for future premiums<br />

– Practical issues (market <strong>in</strong>formation, calculation)


Insurance IAS – Will it happen <br />

• Exposure Draft still <strong>in</strong>complete<br />

– IASB March meet<strong>in</strong>g did not reach even a tentative<br />

conclusion on deferral / match<strong>in</strong>g versus asset / liability<br />

for “performance report<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>surance contracts


Insurance IAS – Will it happen …<br />

• Letter from US, German and Japanese life assurance trade<br />

bodies to IASB<br />

– Approach elim<strong>in</strong>ates ability <strong>of</strong> management and stakeholders to<br />

focus on operat<strong>in</strong>g results<br />

– Approach will produce mislead<strong>in</strong>g and deceptively volatile results,<br />

s,<br />

not related to underly<strong>in</strong>g economics or future cashflow<br />

– Volatility could cause policyholders to take actions not <strong>in</strong> their r best<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<br />

– Stockholders will make <strong>in</strong>appropriate judgements on the real<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>surers<br />

Parallels with FRS 17


F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Questions<br />

• EU decision for 2005<br />

– Can deadl<strong>in</strong>e be met for <strong>in</strong>surance companies <br />

– If not, can Insurance Accounts Directive cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />

apply<br />

• Read<strong>in</strong>ess for Fair Value Report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– Listed <strong>in</strong>surers<br />

– More general application


Prudential Supervision<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> Course <strong>of</strong> Implementation<br />

• Solvency 1 Exercise<br />

• EU Directive <strong>of</strong> March 2002<br />

– M<strong>in</strong>imum Harmonisation<br />

– Early Intervention<br />

– Indexation <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>imum Guaranteed Fund<br />

– Items eligible for Solvency Marg<strong>in</strong><br />

– Unit L<strong>in</strong>ked Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

– Permanent Health Insurance<br />

– Re<strong>in</strong>surance<br />

– Deteriorat<strong>in</strong>g F<strong>in</strong>ancial Position


Solvency I<br />

Solvency II<br />

Why Solvency II <br />

• Criticisms <strong>of</strong> Current Approach<br />

– Lack <strong>of</strong> transparency<br />

– Narrow scope <strong>of</strong> risks considered<br />

– Insensitivity to company specific risk pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

– Need for convergence <strong>of</strong> prudential rules across sectors<br />

– Integration with f<strong>in</strong>ancial report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Parallel Work at <strong>in</strong>ternational level<br />

– International Association <strong>of</strong> Insurance Supervisors<br />

– International Actuarial Association


Solvency II Process (1)<br />

• Initiated by EU Commission / Insurance Committee.<br />

• Solvency II Work<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />

– Formation <strong>of</strong> specialist groups<br />

– Consultancy Study (methodologies to assess the overall f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

position <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>surance undertak<strong>in</strong>g from the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />

prudential supervision)<br />

– Review <strong>of</strong> the prudential system <strong>in</strong> Bank<strong>in</strong>g (New Basle Accord)<br />

– Review <strong>of</strong> Risk Based Capital systems<br />

– Consideration <strong>of</strong> Prudential Regimes <strong>in</strong> EU<br />

– Template for new EU systems by end 2002


Solvency II Process (2)<br />

• Specialist Groups<br />

– Restricted Work<strong>in</strong>g Groups on Technical Reserves<br />

– Conference <strong>of</strong> Insurance Supervisors Group<br />

» Risk <strong>in</strong>terrelationship analysis<br />

» Regulatory breaches<br />

» “Near misses” analysis<br />

» Case studies<br />

» Diagnostic / preventative / curative tools<br />

» Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary conclusions


New Basle Accord<br />

• Three Pillar Approach<br />

– M<strong>in</strong>imum capital requirement<br />

– Supervisory review process<br />

– Measures to foster market discipl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• M<strong>in</strong>imum Capital Requirements<br />

– Credit risk<br />

– Market risk<br />

– Operational risk<br />

• Determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Capital Requirements<br />

– Standardised approach<br />

– Internal models


IAA Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples for Prudential Regulation<br />

• Prudential report<strong>in</strong>g requires marg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> excess <strong>of</strong> those <strong>in</strong><br />

general purpose accounts<br />

• Excess marg<strong>in</strong>s should be transparent<br />

• Capital requirements should relate to risks not to provider<br />

(bank, <strong>in</strong>surer etc)<br />

• Prudential supervision should encourage / reward good<br />

risk management<br />

• Capital requirement should take account <strong>of</strong> assets held and<br />

policy options<br />

• There should be trigger po<strong>in</strong>ts to act as warn<strong>in</strong>g signs


Future Prudential Report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

General purpose<br />

Regulatory accounts<br />

Free Assets<br />

Shareholder Equity<br />

Prudential<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>s (risk<br />

based capital)<br />

GAAP Marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Required Regulatory Assets<br />

Fair Value Liability<br />

Best Estimate<br />

Liability


F<strong>in</strong>al Thoughts<br />

• Timescale<br />

• Policy for Irish Regulator <br />

• Implications for Irish Regulator <br />

• Revolution or Reformation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!