29.12.2014 Views

Issue 73 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

Issue 73 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

Issue 73 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHANGING THE WORLD<br />

25<br />

STANFORD<br />

LAWYER<br />

In her work on asbestos litigation,<br />

Deborah R. Hensler,<br />

Judge John W. Ford Professor of<br />

Dispute Resolution, says she often<br />

hears the question, “Asbestos<br />

Isn’t that in the past”<br />

Quite the contrary: because asbestos-related diseases<br />

have a latency period of up to 40 years, the injuries—and<br />

the lawsuits—have multiplied in recent years.<br />

And because asbestos lined the pipes and ceilings of<br />

so many buildings throughout the United States, and<br />

was used in myriad products, Hensler said, “There’s an<br />

almost unlimited number of business entities that had<br />

some responsibility for workers’ exposure.”<br />

So Hensler’s work on a RAND Corporation study<br />

released May 10 of this year, “Asbestos Litigation,” is<br />

only too timely. Hensler joined the law school faculty<br />

in 1998 from RAND, where she was director of the<br />

Institute for Civil Justice, the pre-eminent center for<br />

non-advocacy research on civil justice policy.<br />

The most disturbing findings of the report,<br />

Hensler says, are that people with minor or no injuries<br />

are now filing the majority of the lawsuits, and more<br />

than half the money spent is going to lawyers and<br />

legal expenses.<br />

“There are lots of people who have X-rays that<br />

show damage but have no symptoms,” Hensler said.<br />

“My hope is that through congressional or other<br />

PHOTO: LINLY HARRIS<br />

DEBORAH HENSLER: REFORMING ASBESTOS LITIGATION<br />

action, the system will be reformed so that more of the<br />

money will go to the people who’ve been most seriously<br />

injured.”<br />

In the RAND report, Hensler and her co-authors<br />

discuss recent proposals for reforming the asbestos<br />

compensation system, including using medical criteria<br />

to screen tort claims, and removing asbestos litigation<br />

from the tort system entirely, substituting a trust fund<br />

for asbestos victims.<br />

This spring, the U.S. Senate voted legislation that<br />

would establish a trust fund—SB 852—out of committee.<br />

But whether it will make it into law is still unclear;<br />

asbestos litigation reform has been proposed many<br />

times before, only to fail.<br />

“Deborah is the neutral party who tries to provide<br />

objective information to the policymakers so they can<br />

sort out their issues,” said Stephen Carroll, a senior<br />

economist at RAND. “She is very concerned about<br />

fairness and equity, and a part of her concern is to alert<br />

policymakers that the court system does not handle<br />

mass litigation well.”<br />

Hensler, who has been studying asbestos litigation<br />

since the 1980s, said that the subject never fails<br />

to interest her. “Asbestos litigation provides a prism<br />

through which to view the strengths and weaknesses<br />

of the tort system,” she said. “Whenever I think there<br />

is nothing further to learn from the asbestos saga, I<br />

am proved wrong.”—Mandy Erickson<br />

PAMELA KARLAN: EXTENDING VOTING RIGHTS<br />

The Mississippi and Arkansas<br />

Deltas share similar history<br />

and demographics. But there is a<br />

subtle difference. In Mississippi,<br />

on the eastern bank of the<br />

Mississippi River, the local government<br />

must receive federal approval before it makes<br />

any changes to registration requirement, voting procedures,<br />

or electoral districts. In Arkansas, on the western<br />

bank, “preclearance” doesn’t apply. As a result, said<br />

Pamela S. Karlan, “If you look at Mississippi, the black<br />

community there has been much more successful at<br />

electing representatives of its choice than comparable<br />

communities in the Arkansas Delta.”<br />

PHOTO: LINDA A. CICERO<br />

The preliminary research, which Karlan compiled<br />

with student help, is just one piece of evidence the<br />

Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public<br />

Interest Law hopes to use this fall as part of a concerted<br />

effort to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act. Passed<br />

in 1965 at the height of the civil rights movement,<br />

the groundbreaking federal legislation permanently<br />

outlawed such practices as poll taxes and literacy tests<br />

that were designed to prevent African-Americans from<br />

voting.<br />

But the act also included some temporary provisions<br />

that will expire in 2007 unless Congress acts.<br />

Among them is Section 5, which requires that certain<br />

states and counties receive preclearance from the feder-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!