30.12.2014 Views

The role of brand image congruity in Chinese consumers ... - Emerald

The role of brand image congruity in Chinese consumers ... - Emerald

The role of brand image congruity in Chinese consumers ... - Emerald

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Brand <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>consumers</strong>’ <strong>brand</strong> preference<br />

J<strong>in</strong>g Hu, X<strong>in</strong> Liu, Sijun Wang and Zhil<strong>in</strong> Yang<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Product & Brand Management<br />

Volume 21 · Number 1 · 2012 · 26–34<br />

Table III Regression results: relationship between functional <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong>, symbolic <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong>, and <strong>brand</strong> preference <strong>in</strong> upward symbolic<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>congruity</strong> and downward symbolic <strong>in</strong><strong>congruity</strong><br />

Upward symbolic <strong>in</strong><strong>congruity</strong><br />

Downward symbolic <strong>in</strong><strong>congruity</strong><br />

Model Standardized b t-value F R 2 Standardized b t-value F R 2<br />

6.876 * 0.031 3.726 ** 0.020<br />

FC 0.189 3.238 * 0.173 2.702 *<br />

SC 20.195 23.344 * 20.081 21.267<br />

Notes: * p , 0:01; ** p , 0:05<br />

procedure. A regression <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>brand</strong> preference as the<br />

dependent variable, with symbolic and functional <strong>image</strong><br />

<strong>congruity</strong> as two <strong>in</strong>dependent variables, suggests that these<br />

two <strong>in</strong>dependent variables satisfactorily expla<strong>in</strong> variance <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>brand</strong> preference (Model 1: R 2 ¼ 0:022, F ¼ 9:255,<br />

p , 0:001). Table II also shows results <strong>of</strong> this analysis. Like<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> analysis on Bora, here functional <strong>image</strong><br />

<strong>congruity</strong> positively affects <strong>brand</strong> preference (standardized<br />

b ¼ 0:176, p , 0:001) and symbolic <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong><br />

negatively affects <strong>brand</strong> preference (standardized<br />

b ¼ 20:075, p ¼ 0:068); H1a is supported, and H1b is not<br />

supported. As hypothesized <strong>in</strong> H2, the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

regression analysis suggest that symbolic <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong> is<br />

a significant predictor <strong>of</strong> functional <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong><br />

(R 2 ¼ 0:311, F ¼ 376:805, p , 0:001); H2 is supported.<br />

After add<strong>in</strong>g two mean-centered <strong>in</strong>teraction terms Fam*FC2<br />

and Fam*SC2, the model is significantly improved (Model 2:<br />

R 2 ¼ :241, F ¼ 53:889, p , 0:001). Fam*FC2 is significant<br />

(standardized b ¼ 0:098, p ¼ 0:041) and Fam*SC2 is not<br />

significant (standardized b ¼ 20:043, p ¼ 0:396); H3a is<br />

supported, and H3b is not supported.<br />

Discussion<br />

Great challenges and opportunities that today’s <strong>brand</strong> carriers<br />

are fac<strong>in</strong>g have moved well beyond the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g stage;<br />

companies have to make hard choices as they enter the global<br />

market: should they ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the same <strong>image</strong> worldwide, or<br />

adapt it to different geographic areas This challenge is<br />

immediate, especially <strong>in</strong> the automobile market, as major<br />

manufacturers actively seek opportunities outside the USA<br />

(Kiley, 2008). Our study is another “wake-up call” for <strong>brand</strong><br />

carriers who seem to prefer adher<strong>in</strong>g to conventional wisdom,<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed from long mature Western markets, and who may<br />

wish to misapply it to newly emerg<strong>in</strong>g markets or different<br />

cultures.<br />

Based on a large-scale field study with Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>consumers</strong>,<br />

we uncovered at least two surpris<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs while confirm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

three exist<strong>in</strong>g ones. Specifically, we found that symbolic <strong>image</strong><br />

<strong>congruity</strong> had a negative impact on Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>consumers</strong>’<br />

<strong>brand</strong> preference when a <strong>brand</strong>’s perceived symbolic <strong>image</strong> is<br />

higher than <strong>consumers</strong>’ ideal expectations (i.e. upward<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>congruity</strong>). That is, the farther the upward distance is<br />

from <strong>consumers</strong>’ ideal expectations (i.e. <strong>in</strong>congruent), the<br />

stronger the <strong>brand</strong> preference is. This surpris<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

obviously, contradicts Sirgy et al. (1991)’s f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the US<br />

market, with<strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> our study. Sirgy et al. (1991)<br />

reported <strong>in</strong> their three studies that a symbolic <strong>image</strong> match<br />

with <strong>consumers</strong>’ ideal social <strong>image</strong> has a positive impact on<br />

store loyalty. Although we acknowledge that symbolic <strong>image</strong><br />

<strong>congruity</strong> was measured differently <strong>in</strong> our study as compared<br />

with their symbolic-self <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong>, the same logic<br />

should hold. Upon close exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> their study, we<br />

actually found a similar surpris<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their replication<br />

<strong>of</strong> study one; they also found a negative relationship between<br />

symbolic-self <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong> when replicat<strong>in</strong>g their study <strong>in</strong><br />

a discount department store with a cloth<strong>in</strong>g department store<br />

(Sirgy et al., 1991, p. 367). We speculate that the cloth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

department store <strong>in</strong> their study is more related to conspicuous<br />

consumption than a discount department store; thus, upward<br />

reference po<strong>in</strong>ts could more likely serve as an ideal po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong><br />

form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>consumers</strong>’ perceived symbolic <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong>. In<br />

our study context, automobile products are still perceived as<br />

conspicuous consumption among Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>consumers</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, <strong>consumers</strong> display an upward tendency to prefer<br />

products with <strong>brand</strong> <strong>image</strong> higher than expected. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese are<br />

acutely sensitive to hav<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g face <strong>in</strong> all aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> social and bus<strong>in</strong>ess life (Yau et al., 1999; Ho, 1975; Hsu,<br />

1963). Based on this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, it appears that a <strong>brand</strong> carrier<br />

should avoid promot<strong>in</strong>g its <strong>brand</strong>’s symbolic fit to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

<strong>consumers</strong>’ ideal expectations. Instead, the symbolic <strong>brand</strong><br />

<strong>image</strong> should be promoted to be higher than <strong>consumers</strong>’<br />

current ideal expectations <strong>in</strong> order to appeal to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

<strong>consumers</strong>. In other words, <strong>brand</strong> barriers should take one<br />

step further from what their Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>consumers</strong> <strong>in</strong>form them<br />

about what is ideal. <strong>The</strong> unique culture context <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a and<br />

the develop<strong>in</strong>g stage <strong>of</strong> its automobile market leads to<br />

disconfirmation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g western <strong>congruity</strong> theory and<br />

requires marketers to localize their strategies <strong>in</strong> some aspects.<br />

Further, we found that <strong>brand</strong> familiarity does not moderate<br />

the <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> symbolic <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>consumers</strong>’<br />

<strong>brand</strong> preference. This, aga<strong>in</strong>, is <strong>in</strong> contrast to the current<br />

consumer knowledge literature (Fiske and Taylor, 1991). We<br />

believe that failure to f<strong>in</strong>d support for the moderat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>brand</strong> familiarity could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the abstract nature <strong>of</strong><br />

symbolic <strong>image</strong>. Because symbolic <strong>image</strong> relates to valueexpressive<br />

<strong>image</strong>ry association <strong>of</strong> a <strong>brand</strong> (Sirgy et al., 1991),<br />

its impact on <strong>brand</strong> preference may not require as many<br />

itemized analyses as may functional <strong>brand</strong> <strong>image</strong>. Rather, the<br />

symbolic <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong> could exert its <strong>in</strong>fluence on <strong>brand</strong><br />

preference <strong>in</strong> a higher abstract process without referr<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />

lower constructural level (Kardes et al., 2006). We found that<br />

high familiarity did not reduce the effect <strong>of</strong> symbolic <strong>image</strong><br />

<strong>congruity</strong> on <strong>consumers</strong>’ <strong>brand</strong> preference, unlike that <strong>of</strong><br />

functional <strong>image</strong> <strong>congruity</strong>. On the other hand, as high<br />

familiarity leads to better <strong>brand</strong> <strong>image</strong> (Sujan and Bettman,<br />

1989), we could use market<strong>in</strong>g activities to enhance <strong>brand</strong><br />

familiarity and develop superior symbolic <strong>image</strong> <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>brand</strong> preference. From a managerial perspective, we<br />

believe this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g could help managers to improve their<br />

<strong>brand</strong> management and enhance consumer satisfaction.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!