30.12.2014 Views

Public Health Bulletin Edition 1, 2004 - SA Health - SA.Gov.au

Public Health Bulletin Edition 1, 2004 - SA Health - SA.Gov.au

Public Health Bulletin Edition 1, 2004 - SA Health - SA.Gov.au

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure one shows three-year moving averages for<br />

both incidence and lung cancer-specific mortality; the data<br />

has been adjusted for age to allow meaningful comparisons<br />

.<br />

The incidence of lung cancer reduced by about 25%<br />

in males between 1977-80 and the late 1990s, and a<br />

similar reduction is evident for mortality. By contrast,<br />

females showed an approximate 60% increase in lung<br />

cancer incidence over this period, with the majority of<br />

this increase occurring before 1992. Female lung cancer<br />

mortality shows a 50% increase before 1992, but with<br />

no further increase thereafter.<br />

Smoking is considered to be strongly associated with<br />

squamous and small-cell lesions rather than with<br />

adenocarcinomas. It is likely that the decrease in males<br />

is due to reduced smoking, and this is supported by<br />

Registry data which shows that the ratio of these cell<br />

types fell from 2.4 to 1.5 over this period. By comparison,<br />

there was little change in the ratio of these cell types in<br />

females.<br />

The incidence of diagnosed breast cancer has<br />

increased by nearly 60% from 1977-80 to the present<br />

time, due mostly to increases since the late 1980s that<br />

followed the introduction of population-based<br />

mammography screening. In the 50-69 year-old target<br />

group, the increase was approximately 80%, with a<br />

greater proportion being diagnosed when they were small<br />

and more amenable to treatment.<br />

Implications of this data for anti-smoking campaigns,<br />

especially for women, are apparent. But lung cancer may<br />

also be c<strong>au</strong>sed by exposure to asbestos, ionizing radiation<br />

and other occupational carcinogens, and interventions to<br />

limit exposure to these agents should be continued.<br />

Time trends in three significant cancers<br />

It is generally accepted that the application of a<br />

successful cancer screening or early detection program<br />

is followed by a significant reduction in cancer-specific<br />

mortality. Figures 2, 3 and 4 show incidence and mortality<br />

trends for cervical, breast and prostate cancers. Cervical<br />

and breast cancers have been subject to formal screening<br />

programs while prostate has been the subject of much<br />

discussion and debate bec<strong>au</strong>se of the widespread<br />

application of a blood test (Prostate-specific Antigen)<br />

followed by biopsy.<br />

The incidence of cervical cancer has reduced by<br />

nearly 40% from 1977-80 to the present time. This is<br />

attributed to the detection and early treatment of precursor<br />

lesions.<br />

Cervical cancer-specific mortality rates have decreased<br />

by 60% over the same period. Overall, the percentage<br />

reduction in mortality was greater than the corresponding<br />

reduction in incidence.<br />

This effect is attributable to the application of early<br />

detection methods in the early 1980s, and to the adoption<br />

of formal screening after a series of successful pilot<br />

programs.<br />

Breast cancer-specific mortality rates reduced by<br />

10% for all ages combined over the same period. Overseas<br />

studies have shown that the impact of breast screening<br />

on mortality rates can take several years to become<br />

evident. Near full screening coverage for the <strong>SA</strong><br />

community was not achieved until 1991-1992. Within the<br />

last two years 66% of women between 50 – 69 years of<br />

age have been screened. Nonetheless, the agestandardised<br />

mortality rate over the last three years was<br />

20% lower than for the preceding decade in the 50-69<br />

year olds. A smaller reduction of 10% applied to women<br />

over 69 years of age, many of whom would have been<br />

screened at a younger age. There has been no reduction<br />

in mortality for women of less than 50 years of age. A<br />

major challenge is to develop a cost-effective means of<br />

screening these younger women, who tend to have<br />

denser breast tissue. Other forms of imaging are being<br />

investigated, as well as circulating tumour markers.<br />

The incidence of diagnosed prostate cancer has<br />

increased by nearly 95% between 1977-80 and the<br />

present time, peaking in 1993. Most of this increase has<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!