Member Satisfaction Survey Results - Home page DB Plan
Member Satisfaction Survey Results - Home page DB Plan
Member Satisfaction Survey Results - Home page DB Plan
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DEFERREDS 8,893<br />
Returned 361 (355 postal, 6 online)<br />
• 16 overseas<br />
• Of the members who entered their Gender, 266 were Male, 91 Female<br />
• Age ranges, 13 were in their 30s, 37 in 40s, 158 in 50s and 264 were in their 60s<br />
• Business categories – 119 as former Paper employees, 50 Plastic, 29 Packaging, 30<br />
Glass/Redfearn 22 PLC/Corporate and 20 from Cans/ANC, the remainder identified<br />
themselves in the OTHER category.<br />
First Contact with Pensions Department<br />
• Earliest initial contact was made by 2 members in 1972. 8 others made contact in 1970s, 27<br />
during 1980s and 66 during the 90s. Majority (141) have made contact during the 2000s,<br />
with 105 of those being since 2006.<br />
• Over 96% positively rated the responses for the Initial Telephone and Letter Contact, and over<br />
95% for Email. The Poor ratings related mainly to Speed and Quality rather than Politeness.<br />
• 85 additional comments received relating to First Contact:<br />
o Over 80% of these remarked on the reason for the contact (ie address change) and also<br />
the efficiency of the response/staff.<br />
o 10% contact was made via a financial manager/Company on their behalf<br />
o 4 referred to impolite personnel. These were noted in 1984, 1990, 2001 and 2006<br />
o The remainder expressed their dissatisfaction with the response given<br />
Last Contact<br />
• 1 deferred last made contact in 1982, the rest were during 90s (21) and 2000 (222). The<br />
majority of these were in the last five years (2008 =16, 2009 =24, 2010 =29, 2011=37<br />
with 70 last contacting the Pensions Department in 2012).<br />
• Over 97% positively rated the responses for their Last Telephone Contact with the Department.<br />
• Over 95% were more than happy with their Letter and Email Contact. The Poor ratings<br />
related mainly to Speed of response for all categories and Quality and Politeness for<br />
Telephone and Letter contact.<br />
Complaints<br />
• 9 deferred members had cause to complain (2 within last 12 months, 5 within the last 5<br />
years), additional comments received on the complaints covered<br />
o Negative comments towards staff attitude<br />
o Incorrect figures<br />
o Unsatisfactory response or having to chase<br />
o Pension not paid into bank caused overdrawn charge<br />
Internet<br />
• 282 said they have internet access, whereas 6 do not<br />
• 50 had visited our <strong>Plan</strong> and all but 3 thought it was clear and understandable and provided<br />
the information they were seeking<br />
• Just 3 comments were received under information missing on the website and these related to<br />
availability of individual forecast information online and exclusion data and policy<br />
• 78 confirmed they use social media, 232 do not<br />
• 283 feel the frequency of our communications is Enough, 4 believe it is Too Little whilst<br />
another 4 feel it’s Too Much.<br />
<strong>Member</strong> Q Analysis – Deferred 4 16 May 2013