Member Satisfaction Survey Results - Home page DB Plan
Member Satisfaction Survey Results - Home page DB Plan
Member Satisfaction Survey Results - Home page DB Plan
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Orbiter<br />
• 219 do not read Orbiter and of those that do, 71 do not think it is Clear and Understandable<br />
• 406 pensioner do not feel Orbiter is relevant. Judging by several comments on the<br />
questionnaire this high number may relate to the individual being the spouse of former<br />
member and so no direct association with the Company<br />
• 78 feel information is missing from Orbiter and the following are from 28 additional comments<br />
provided relating to Orbiter<br />
o Over half wish to see their old company mentioned/ information about their former<br />
company ie what happened to it/ news of former colleagues<br />
o Website for past employees<br />
o Actual rate of increase at time known<br />
o Assurance pension is safe<br />
o Profile in each issue of a main board member<br />
o Request for larger publication<br />
o Information re current products/where we are now/performance<br />
o Publish notice of deaths of pensioners<br />
o certain colours on certain backgrounds are difficult to read with poor eyesight.<br />
Payslips<br />
• 12 do not think their payslips are Clear and Understandable<br />
• 67 feel their last payslip was missing certain details. 14 comments received to this effect<br />
relating to<br />
o Detailed build-up of pension increases<br />
o Several regarding not received a payslip recently<br />
o No information regarding the freezing of April 2012 pension<br />
o Had to obtain P60 information by phone<br />
o US taxes need a calendar year statement<br />
o Web address<br />
o Why deduct small amount of tax, but HM then send a refund cheque year’s full amount<br />
o Payslip more often or access to payslip information online.<br />
General comments from Pensioners<br />
478 added comments within this section. 390 used this section to express their satisfaction for the<br />
service received.<br />
• A number were appreciative of the fact the Department tracked them down from unknown<br />
addresses to receive their pension.<br />
• Those comparing Rexam to their other associated pension schemes rated Rexam higher<br />
• 4 indicated they were registered blind and had our communications read to them.<br />
• Several requests for an idea of spouse’s benefits on death /calculation method’s<br />
• A number referred to the Equitable Life AVC compensation scheme requesting more updates<br />
• Suggestions towards our communications/publications or requested information/clarification<br />
for their individual circumstance.<br />
Other comments from pensioners<br />
Within this additional section, as well as pensioners reiterating their entries within the Questionnaire<br />
and requesting information/explanations to their own personal circumstances, 6 Negative<br />
comments were added; 2 relating to the lack of discretionary increases, the other 4 relating to this<br />
Questionnaire/our printed publications.<br />
<strong>Member</strong> Q Analysis – Pensioners 8 16 May 2013