Energy balance analysis of cogeneration power plant and ... - JINR
Energy balance analysis of cogeneration power plant and ... - JINR
Energy balance analysis of cogeneration power plant and ... - JINR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
University <strong>of</strong> West Bohemia<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> electrical engineering<br />
<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>cogeneration</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
design <strong>of</strong> innovation<br />
Ales Kaplan
<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong><br />
<strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> <strong>and</strong> design <strong>of</strong> innovation<br />
Content<br />
1. Introduction<br />
2. Technical parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong><br />
<strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> Plzeňská teplárenská a.s.<br />
3. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> <strong>and</strong> self-consumption<br />
4. Design <strong>of</strong> innovation for more effective<br />
operation<br />
5. Conclusion<br />
2
1. Introduction<br />
Cogeneration <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong>s<br />
in Pilsen:<br />
• Plzeňská energetika<br />
• Plzeňská teplárenská<br />
3
2. Technical parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> <strong>power</strong><br />
<strong>plant</strong> Plzeňská teplárenská a.s.<br />
2.1. Boiler part<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> boiler <strong>power</strong> efficiency Start <strong>of</strong><br />
operation<br />
2x hot water boiler K2, K3 –<br />
brown coal<br />
2x high pressure steam boiler<br />
K4, K5 – brown coal<br />
1x high pressure steam boiler<br />
K6 – coal + biomass<br />
1x high pressure steam boiler<br />
K7 – biomass<br />
6 boilers 495,6<br />
MWt<br />
69,6 MWt 81% 1976<br />
256 MWt 86% 1986<br />
135 MWt 92% 1999<br />
35 MWt 91% 2010<br />
4
2. Technical parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> <strong>power</strong><br />
<strong>plant</strong> Plzeňská teplárenská a.s.<br />
2.2. Turbine part <strong>of</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong><br />
turbine Power <strong>of</strong> generator p a (MPa) t a ( C)<br />
Steam turbine - TG1 55 MWe 13,3 535<br />
Steam turbine – TG2 50 MWe 13,3 535<br />
Steam turbine – TG3 11,5 MWe 6,6 485<br />
3 turbines 116,5 MWe<br />
p a = admission pressure; t a =admission temperature<br />
5
2. Technical parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> <strong>power</strong><br />
<strong>plant</strong> Plzeňská teplárenská a.s.<br />
2.3. Basic scheme <strong>of</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong><br />
6
3. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> <strong>and</strong> self-consumption<br />
3.1. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> <strong>of</strong> primary fuel – year 2010<br />
2 481 720; 24,05%<br />
38 084; 0,37%<br />
7 798 510; 75,58%<br />
energy <strong>of</strong> brown coal (GJ) energy <strong>of</strong> biomass (GJ) energy <strong>of</strong> nature gas (GJ)<br />
7
3. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> <strong>and</strong> self-consumption<br />
3.2. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> in <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> - 2010<br />
8
3. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> <strong>and</strong> self-consumption<br />
3.3. Distribution <strong>of</strong> heat in heating system - 2010<br />
9
3. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>balance</strong> <strong>and</strong> self-consumption<br />
3.4. Self-consumption <strong>of</strong> electricity<br />
• The most important devices:<br />
hot water pumps: 5,8 MW<br />
boiler pumps: celkem 8,88MW<br />
ventilators <strong>of</strong> burning products: 1,44MW<br />
air ventilators: 3,1MW<br />
coal mills: 2,1MW<br />
Self-consumption:<br />
• 26MW – <strong>power</strong> <strong>of</strong> devices – 22% - compare with output<br />
<strong>power</strong> <strong>of</strong> generators<br />
• 4,2% - compared with energy <strong>of</strong> primary fuel energy in<br />
2010<br />
• 18,56% - compared with energy <strong>of</strong> generated electricity<br />
2010<br />
10
4. Design <strong>of</strong> innovation for more effective operation<br />
• calculating flow <strong>of</strong> steam based on pressure difference<br />
• pressure loss<br />
• inaccurate measuring <strong>of</strong> admission steam flow to the<br />
turbine → inaccurate control <strong>of</strong> generating electricity<br />
• Possible principles <strong>of</strong> measuring:<br />
Pitot/Annubaric tube<br />
small turbine flowmeters<br />
electromagnetic flowmeter<br />
ultrasonic flowmeter<br />
11
4. Design <strong>of</strong> innovation for more effective operation<br />
Ultrasonic flowmeter:<br />
• transmission <strong>of</strong> acoustic wave through medium<br />
• no pressure loss<br />
• conductivity <strong>of</strong> medium doesn't required<br />
• progress in research <strong>of</strong> this principle<br />
12
4. Design <strong>of</strong> innovation for more effective operation<br />
Required parameters <strong>of</strong> steam = dem<strong>and</strong>s on flowmeter<br />
Steam pipe for TG1,2<br />
Steam pipe for TG3<br />
Temperature ( C) 535 485<br />
Pressure (MPa) 13,3 6,6<br />
Flow (tones/hour) Max. 350 Max. 49<br />
Diameter <strong>of</strong> pipe TG1: DN 200<br />
TG2: DN 250<br />
DN 200<br />
13
4. Design <strong>of</strong> innovation for more effective operation<br />
Ultrasonic flowmeter<br />
Name OPTISONIC 8300<br />
Diameter DN 100 600<br />
Temperature<br />
Max. 540 C<br />
Pressure<br />
Max. 25MPa<br />
Measuring accuracy 1%<br />
Prize<br />
50 000 € ≈ 1 250 000 CZK<br />
14
Conclusion<br />
• Conclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> operation in 2010:<br />
gross efficiency η = 59,2%<br />
efficiency η = 54,6%<br />
• Conclusion <strong>of</strong> innovation:<br />
Accurate measuring <strong>of</strong> steam flow without pressure loss<br />
rising <strong>of</strong> efficiency approximately 0,5‰ (guessed value)<br />
15
That’s all…<br />
Thank you for your attention<br />
16