In Progress – DO NOT CITE Attributional inference across cultures ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Culture, Attribution, & Automaticity 40 Acknowledgements We thank Naomi Eisenberger, Dan Gilbert, Jennifer Pfeifer, Ajay Satpute and the members of the Social Cognitive Neuroscience laboratory at UCLA for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. We thank Tamara Skadrak, Justin Henderson, and Maya Belitski for their assistance in data collection.
Culture, Attribution, & Automaticity 41 Figure Captions Figure 1. Sequential operations model of dispositional (D-sequence) and situational (Ssequence) attribution (adapted from Gilbert, 1989; Krull, 1993). Figure 2. Composite dispositional anxiety ratings made in study 1 (D-sequence, discounting) as a function of participant culture and cognitive load condition. Higher scores indicate stronger dispositional attributions. Figure 3. Composite ratings of how anxiety-provoking the situation was in study 2 (Ssequence, discounting) as a function of participant culture and cognitive load condition. Higher scores indicate stronger situational attributions. Figure 4. Composite dispositional anxiety ratings made in study 3 (D-sequence, augmenting) as a function of participant culture and cognitive load condition. Higher scores indicate stronger dispositional attributions. Figure 5. Dispositional happiness ratings made by EA participants observing EA and US targets. Higher scores indicate stronger dispositional attributions.
Page 1 and 2: In Progress - DO NOT CITE Culture,
Page 3 and 4: Culture, Attribution, & Automaticit
Page 39: Culture, Attribution, & Automaticit
Page 47: Culture, Attribution, & Automaticit

In Progress – DO NOT CITE Attributional inference across cultures ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?