10.11.2012 Views

Mammoth Rub Update - Society for California Archaeology

Mammoth Rub Update - Society for California Archaeology

Mammoth Rub Update - Society for California Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A similar coastal and interior pasture system likely existed<br />

south of the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia River as well. A grassland (or grassland<br />

savanna) of approximately 300,000 ha probably existed<br />

beneath the current San Francisco Bay and southward to San<br />

Juan Bautista. To the west, an approximately 400,000-ha prairie<br />

extended from the mouth of the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia River south to the<br />

San Benito River. “Franciscan Valley” is what Daniel Axelrod<br />

(1981:848) has termed the trough that is now inundated by San<br />

Francisco Bay. For the purposes of my discussion, I use the<br />

term “Franciscan Valley” to designate the area extending from<br />

Cloverdale south to San Juan Bautista. Likewise, my “Farallon<br />

Plain” extends from a point north of the Russian River’s mouth<br />

south to the San Benito River. Thus, the Franciscan Valley of<br />

the late Pleistocene measured approximately 500,000 ha while<br />

the Farallon Plain was at least 700,000 ha is size. At 1.2 million<br />

ha, the combined Farallon Plain–Franciscan Valley ecosystem<br />

was approximately 1/8 the size of today’s Serengeti-Mara<br />

ecosystem in East Africa. 7<br />

A number of obvious east-west corridors linked these<br />

interior and coastal “pastures,” allowing <strong>for</strong> the easy<br />

anastrophic migration movements of herds of megaherbivores<br />

(cf. Jefferson 1988; Jefferson and Goldin 1989). 8 The<br />

<strong>Mammoth</strong> Rocks site sits adjacent to one such corridor, the<br />

lower Russian River Valley. Another corridor was probably the<br />

area comprised of the Estero Americano, Estero San Antonio,<br />

San Antonio Creek, Americano Creek, and Stemple Creek<br />

drainage systems linking Novato and Petaluma with Bodega<br />

Bay. Further south, another corridor most likely followed the<br />

Crystal Springs Reservoir (San Andreas Fault) linking Palo Alto<br />

with San Francisco’s Lake Merced area.<br />

Naturally, the most obvious corridor connecting the<br />

Franciscan Valley with the Farallon Plain followed the south<br />

side of the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia River through the Golden Gate. During<br />

the late Pleistocene, this corridor passed through what I term<br />

the “Alcatraz Triangle,” an area located just inside the Golden<br />

Gate and bounded by the Golden Gate, Angel Island, and<br />

Alcatraz Island. One area of interest within the Triangle is<br />

revealed by bathymetric data. Near the Triangle’s center are<br />

found three rock pinnacles known as Harding, Shag, and Arch<br />

Rocks. 9 All three are currently hidden beneath the waters of<br />

San Francisco Bay. However, during the late Pleistocene, all<br />

three rocks were exposed. Harding Rock, the largest of the<br />

three, stood over 100 m in height. 10 This trio of rocks<br />

commanded an area where the trail corridor narrowed down as<br />

it approached the Golden Gate. Such an area would have<br />

provided ideal cover <strong>for</strong> Ice Age predators (especially Smilodon<br />

cali<strong>for</strong>nicus, Panthera leo, and Arctous simus) intent on ambushing<br />

passing prey animals. 11 It is likely that Paleoindians made use<br />

of the area as well. 12 Indeed, providing the Coastal Migration<br />

Theory holds true, the corridor leading through the Alcatraz<br />

Triangle connecting the coastal plain with the interior could<br />

have provided the first settlers with an advantageous route <strong>for</strong><br />

colonizing Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s Central Valley (Surovell 2003:589). It<br />

would have also allowed easy access to the coastal plain by<br />

interior Paleoindian populations (e.g., Clovis) moving west<br />

from the Central Valley.<br />

<strong>Mammoth</strong> Rocks also appears to have been located along a<br />

major migration corridor. It is likely that the rubbing rocks sat<br />

29<br />

beside a major game trail linking the interior Santa Rosa Plain<br />

with the coastal plain by way of a pass leading up from the<br />

Russian River and passing between Red and Peaked Hills. The<br />

pass is still used today by State Highway 1. After coming up<br />

from the Russian River by way of the pass, late Pleistocene<br />

animal herds would have looked out across an approximately<br />

20-km wide coastal prairie (at ca. 19,000-15,000 CALYBP), with<br />

the large exposed seastacks of <strong>Mammoth</strong> Rocks sitting directly<br />

in front of them. The coastal plain would have been marked by<br />

freshwater ponds and estuaries, meandering tree-lined<br />

drainages, localized sand dunes, and other exposed seastacks.<br />

The seastacks offered protection to herd animals, especially on<br />

windy landscapes like the Sonoma Coast.<br />

The Jasper Rock site, like <strong>Mammoth</strong> Rocks, is situated at<br />

the interior edge of the late Pleistocene coastal prairie. Their<br />

location at the back of the prairie, and along the ecotone<br />

separating the prairie and coastal range, almost guarantees that<br />

both rubbing rock sites were on a major trail corridor that led<br />

north and south along the interior edge of the coastal plain.<br />

The use of this north-south corridor by the megafauna would<br />

have allowed <strong>for</strong> easier movement and quicker access to<br />

choice locations on the prairie. The Duncans Landing<br />

Rockshelter (CA-SON-348/H) sat near this same hypothetical<br />

north-south trail during the late Pleistocene.<br />

For the past two years, I have been surveying the eroding<br />

bluff of the coastal terrace between <strong>Mammoth</strong> Rocks and the<br />

Duncans Landing Rockshelter. This has allowed me to<br />

regularly inspect the subsurface stratigraphy of a 5-km transect<br />

traversing the same area that I propose to have once been<br />

characterized by a major north-south game trail. Not surprising,<br />

I have found a number of archaeological sites along this<br />

transect.<br />

One of the often voiced concerns with the Coastal<br />

Migration Theory, and with the Paleoindian occupation of the<br />

late Pleistocene coastline, is that the archaeological sites<br />

associated with such use were inundated by the rising ocean at<br />

the close of the last Ice Age, and thus little can be found of<br />

them. I believe that is only partly true. If Paleoindians<br />

populated the Sonoma Coast, it seems likely that they would<br />

have made great use of the interior edge of the coastal plain.<br />

The area between <strong>Mammoth</strong> Rocks and the Duncans Landing<br />

Rockshelter was obviously the scene of concentrated<br />

megafaunal activity. As such, the area offered a variety of<br />

resources to the early settlers. For one thing, the area would<br />

have presented rich hunting possibilities. The prospects of<br />

scavenging other predators’ kills may have been an equally or<br />

more important reason <strong>for</strong> visiting the area. Given the<br />

concentration of animals, the area offered such seldomconsidered<br />

resources as bison dung which may have been used<br />

to fuel campfires and cooking hearths. The area’s proximity to<br />

<strong>for</strong>ested hillsides made it an attractive area to <strong>for</strong>age <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>estedge<br />

resources as well. 13<br />

To date, I have located at least three archaeological sites<br />

along the survey transect where artifacts eroding from the<br />

coastal bluffs (from the subsoil at depths of 50-150 cm) appear<br />

to suggest a considerable antiquity (> middle Holocene?).<br />

Included among the artifacts are a few blade-like flakes with<br />

SCA Newsletter 38(4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!