03.01.2015 Views

Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining ... - Moodle

Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining ... - Moodle

Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining ... - Moodle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Morphogenesis</strong> <strong>versus</strong> structuration 483<br />

or peripheric ones. The same arguments<br />

hold for processes of social change.<br />

'Even if there were no problems of<br />

identifying core elements of a system,<br />

there would still be a problem of<br />

distinguishing basic from superficial<br />

changes. This is important for the<br />

following reason: even if one identifies<br />

factor A as strategic in relation to B, C,<br />

D and E, this does not mean that these<br />

other, non-core features do not change<br />

at all without an initial change in A,<br />

nor does it mean that changes in them<br />

have no effect at all on changes in A<br />

. . . The crucial question is: do changes<br />

in A produce radical changes in B, C,<br />

D or E, while changes in B, C, D and<br />

E produce only superficial changes in<br />

A And if the answer to this question<br />

is affirmative, does one have some<br />

measure for distinguishing radical<br />

changes from superficial ones And, if<br />

one does have such a measure, when<br />

does one apply it For the short-run<br />

effect of B on A might be superficial,<br />

while the long-run effect might be<br />

radical! The gist of all this discussion<br />

is that one can only know ex post<br />

facto whether a particular change was<br />

or was not a change in a acore" feature<br />

of the social structure.' (Modern Social<br />

Theory, op. cit., p. 177 (see 176-8).)<br />

68. E. Gellner, 'Holism vs. Individualism',<br />

op. cit., p. 267.<br />

69. Giddens, Central Problems in<br />

Social Theory, op. cit., p. 106.<br />

70. An ambitious attempt, which<br />

nevertheless manifests this defect, to<br />

unify the concepts used in all the social<br />

sciences by translating them into the<br />

terminology of systems theory is<br />

Alfred Kuhn, The Logic of Social<br />

Systems, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco,<br />

1976.<br />

71. Walter Buckley, Sociology and<br />

Afodern Systems Theory, op. cit.,<br />

p. 206.<br />

72. Giddens, Central Problems in<br />

Social Theory, op. cit., p. 4.<br />

73. Ibid.,p.251.<br />

74. Ibid., p. 18.<br />

75. Ibid., p. 47.<br />

76. Ibid., p. 48.<br />

77. Ernest Gellner, Thought and<br />

Change, Weidenfeld & Nicolson,<br />

London, 1964, pp. 184 ff.<br />

78. Eco cited by Giddens, Cen tral<br />

Problems in Social Theory, op. cit.,<br />

p. 106.<br />

79. Walter Buckley, Sociology and<br />

Modern Systems Theory, op. cit.,<br />

p. 137.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!