05.01.2015 Views

Winter 2010 - The Innocence Project

Winter 2010 - The Innocence Project

Winter 2010 - The Innocence Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TRAGEDY IN TEXAS<br />

9<br />

based on nearly identical forensic evidence. Willis was exonerated (and ultimately<br />

compensated by the state) after forensic expert Gerald Hurst exposed the flaws in<br />

the forensics in his case. In the days leading up to Willingham’s execution, Hurst also<br />

reviewed the forensics in Willingham’s case and determined that nothing about the<br />

evidence indicated arson any more than an accidental fire. <strong>The</strong> Texas Board of Pardons<br />

and Paroles and Gov. Perry received the report days before the execution but appear to<br />

have done nothing with the information.<br />

Two other investigations followed, one by the Chicago Tribune and one commissioned<br />

by the <strong>Innocence</strong> <strong>Project</strong>. Both concurred with Hurst’s report. <strong>The</strong> five arson experts<br />

of the <strong>Innocence</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Arson Review Committee studied video footage of the fire<br />

damage, analyzed the trial testimony of the fire investigators and addressed each socalled<br />

arson indicator one by one. Indicators included evidence like “pour patterns”<br />

and “crazed glass.” <strong>The</strong>y wrote: “Each and every one of the indicators relied upon<br />

have since been scientifically proven to be invalid.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> forensic evidence had already been disproven when the <strong>Innocence</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />

submitted the case to the Texas Forensic Science Commission in 2006. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong><br />

<strong>Project</strong> asked the commission to investigate both Willingham’s and Willis’ cases and to<br />

determine how one man could be executed and the other exonerated based on the<br />

same forensics. <strong>The</strong> commission, made up of prosecutors, defense attorneys, forensic<br />

scientists and legal analysts, has the unique ability to help ensure that the kind of<br />

outdated forensic analysis that led to Willingham’s wrongful conviction will no longer<br />

“THIS IS WHAT HE WANTED US<br />

TO DO. HE WANTED US TO<br />

STAND UP FOR HIM.”<br />

– Eugenia Willingham as quoted in the<br />

New York Times, October 14, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

OPPOSITE PAGE: CAMERON TODD WILINGHAM ON THE DAY HE<br />

WAS EXECUTED.<br />

LEFT: EUGENIA WILLINGHAM, STEPMOTHER OF CAMERON<br />

TODD, WITH PHOTOS OF HER LOST GRANDCHILDREN AND THE<br />

STEPSON WHO WAS EXECUTED.<br />

1994 TO 2003 • MICHAEL EVANS 1977 TO 2003 • PAUL TERRY 1977 TO 2003 • LONNIE ERBY 1986 TO 2003 • STEVEN AVERY 1985 TO 2003 • CALVIN WILLIS 1982 TO 2003 • NICHOLAS YARRIS 1982 TO 2003 • CALVIN<br />

L. SCOTT 1983 TO 2003 • WILEY FOUNTAIN 1986 TO 2003 • LEO WATERS 1982 TO 2003 • STEPHAN COWANS 1998 TO 2004 • ANTHONY POWELL 1992 TO 2004 • JOSIAH SUTTON 1999 TO 2004 • LAFONSO ROLLINS 1994<br />

TO 2004 • RYAN MATTHEWS 1999 TO 2004 • WILTON DEDGE 1982, 1984 TO 2004 • ARTHUR L. WHITFIELD 1982 TO 2004 • BARRY LAUGHMAN 1988 TO 2004 • CLARENCE HARRISON 1987 TO 2004 • DAVID A. JONES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!