Winter 2010 - The Innocence Project
Winter 2010 - The Innocence Project
Winter 2010 - The Innocence Project
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TRAGEDY IN TEXAS<br />
9<br />
based on nearly identical forensic evidence. Willis was exonerated (and ultimately<br />
compensated by the state) after forensic expert Gerald Hurst exposed the flaws in<br />
the forensics in his case. In the days leading up to Willingham’s execution, Hurst also<br />
reviewed the forensics in Willingham’s case and determined that nothing about the<br />
evidence indicated arson any more than an accidental fire. <strong>The</strong> Texas Board of Pardons<br />
and Paroles and Gov. Perry received the report days before the execution but appear to<br />
have done nothing with the information.<br />
Two other investigations followed, one by the Chicago Tribune and one commissioned<br />
by the <strong>Innocence</strong> <strong>Project</strong>. Both concurred with Hurst’s report. <strong>The</strong> five arson experts<br />
of the <strong>Innocence</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Arson Review Committee studied video footage of the fire<br />
damage, analyzed the trial testimony of the fire investigators and addressed each socalled<br />
arson indicator one by one. Indicators included evidence like “pour patterns”<br />
and “crazed glass.” <strong>The</strong>y wrote: “Each and every one of the indicators relied upon<br />
have since been scientifically proven to be invalid.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> forensic evidence had already been disproven when the <strong>Innocence</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />
submitted the case to the Texas Forensic Science Commission in 2006. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong><br />
<strong>Project</strong> asked the commission to investigate both Willingham’s and Willis’ cases and to<br />
determine how one man could be executed and the other exonerated based on the<br />
same forensics. <strong>The</strong> commission, made up of prosecutors, defense attorneys, forensic<br />
scientists and legal analysts, has the unique ability to help ensure that the kind of<br />
outdated forensic analysis that led to Willingham’s wrongful conviction will no longer<br />
“THIS IS WHAT HE WANTED US<br />
TO DO. HE WANTED US TO<br />
STAND UP FOR HIM.”<br />
– Eugenia Willingham as quoted in the<br />
New York Times, October 14, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
OPPOSITE PAGE: CAMERON TODD WILINGHAM ON THE DAY HE<br />
WAS EXECUTED.<br />
LEFT: EUGENIA WILLINGHAM, STEPMOTHER OF CAMERON<br />
TODD, WITH PHOTOS OF HER LOST GRANDCHILDREN AND THE<br />
STEPSON WHO WAS EXECUTED.<br />
1994 TO 2003 • MICHAEL EVANS 1977 TO 2003 • PAUL TERRY 1977 TO 2003 • LONNIE ERBY 1986 TO 2003 • STEVEN AVERY 1985 TO 2003 • CALVIN WILLIS 1982 TO 2003 • NICHOLAS YARRIS 1982 TO 2003 • CALVIN<br />
L. SCOTT 1983 TO 2003 • WILEY FOUNTAIN 1986 TO 2003 • LEO WATERS 1982 TO 2003 • STEPHAN COWANS 1998 TO 2004 • ANTHONY POWELL 1992 TO 2004 • JOSIAH SUTTON 1999 TO 2004 • LAFONSO ROLLINS 1994<br />
TO 2004 • RYAN MATTHEWS 1999 TO 2004 • WILTON DEDGE 1982, 1984 TO 2004 • ARTHUR L. WHITFIELD 1982 TO 2004 • BARRY LAUGHMAN 1988 TO 2004 • CLARENCE HARRISON 1987 TO 2004 • DAVID A. JONES