10.11.2012 Views

Download the full book of proceedings - SEH

Download the full book of proceedings - SEH

Download the full book of proceedings - SEH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Biota<br />

Vol. 3, No. 1-2, 2002<br />

Revija za biologijo in ekologijo<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> biology and ecology<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

11th Ordinary General Meeting <strong>of</strong> Societas<br />

Euro pea Herpetologica (<strong>SEH</strong>),<br />

Zalec, Slovenija, July 13-17, 2001<br />

Drustvo za proucevanje ptic in varstvo narave<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> Bird Research and Nature Protection<br />

Drustvo varuhov okolja Radoziv<br />

Environmental Society Radoziv


Biota 3 1-2,2002<br />

11th Ordinary General Meeting <strong>of</strong> Societas<br />

Europea Herpetologica (SEN),<br />

Zalec, Slovenija, July 13-17, 2001<br />

Organised by:<br />

Environmental Society Radoziv, Zalec<br />

Organising committee:<br />

Klavdija Kac<br />

Miran Orozim<br />

Stasa Tome<br />

Milan Vogrin<br />

Gregor Vovk Petrovski<br />

Tanja Vovk Petrovski<br />

Edited by:<br />

Milan Vogrin<br />

Linguistic collaboration:<br />

Victor Kennedy<br />

Scientific committee:<br />

Dr. Wolfgang Bohme (Germany)<br />

Dr. Zoltan Korsos (Hungary)<br />

Dr. Michael R.K. Lambert (United Kingdom)<br />

Dr. Claud Miaud (France)<br />

Msc. Stasa Tome (Slovenia)<br />

Dr. Marco Zuffi (Italy)<br />

The recommended citation for particular paper is e.g.:<br />

Crnobrnja-lsailovic, J. 2003: Notes <strong>of</strong> diurnal activity in Vipera ammodytes<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central<br />

Balkans. In: Vogrin, M. (ed.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 11th Ordinary General Meeting <strong>of</strong><br />

Societas Europea Herpetologica (<strong>SEH</strong>), Zalec, Slovenia, July 13-17, 2001. Biota 3 (1-2):<br />

The papers in this issue are ordered according <strong>the</strong>y alphabetical order <strong>of</strong> authors.


Vsebina/Contents<br />

3 1-2, 2OO2<br />

Milan VOGRIN<br />

Preface 7<br />

Clanki/Articles<br />

Jelka CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIC<br />

Notes <strong>of</strong> diurnal activity in Vipera ammodytes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central Balkans 9<br />

Andris CEIRANS<br />

Reptiles and amphibians <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park, Latvia 17<br />

Augusto GENTILLI, Stefano SCALI, Francesco BARBIERI & Franco BERNINI<br />

A three-year project for <strong>the</strong> management and <strong>the</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> amphibians<br />

in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy 27<br />

Giinter GOLLMANN, Birgit GOLLMANN, Christian BAUMGARTNER & Andrea<br />

WARINGER-LOSCHENKOHL<br />

Spawning site shifts by Rana dalmatina and Rana temporaria in response<br />

to habitat change 35<br />

Kurt GROSSENBACHER<br />

First results <strong>of</strong> a 20-year-study on Common Toad Bufo bufo in <strong>the</strong> Swiss Alps 43<br />

Daniela GUICKING, Ulrich JOGER, Michael WINK<br />

Molecular Phylogeography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Viperine Snake Natrix maura and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Dice Snake Natrix tessellata: first results 49<br />

Adrian HAILEY & Michael R.K. LAMBERT<br />

Comparative growth patterns in Afrotropical giant tortoises (genus Geochelone) 61<br />

Miodrag JOVANOVIC, Dragana BURIC & Zoran MARKOVIC<br />

Tertiary reptiles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Balkan peninsula 67<br />

Zoltan KORSOS & Balazs TROCSANYI<br />

Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna <strong>of</strong> Round Island, Mauritius 77<br />

Bilal KUTRUP & Nurhayat YILMAZ<br />

Preliminary data on some new specimens <strong>of</strong> Vipera barani collected from Trabzon<br />

(Nor<strong>the</strong>astern Turkey) 85<br />

A.C.AA. MEESKE, N. SCHNEEWEISS & K.J. RYBCZYNSKI<br />

Reproduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Pond Turtle Emys orbicularis<br />

in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species range 91<br />

Michele MENEGON & Sebastiano SALVIDIO<br />

Notes on habitat, egg-laying and first record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advertising<br />

call <strong>of</strong> Hyperolius kihangensis 703<br />

Zoltan Tamas NAGY, Ulrich JOGER, Daniela GUICKING & Michael WINK<br />

Phylogeography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Whip Snake Coluber (Hierophis)<br />

viridiflavus as inferred from nucleotide sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mitochondrial<br />

cytochrome b gene and ISSR genomic fingerprinting 109<br />

Christian PASTORELLI, Paolo LAGHI & Dino SCARAVELLI<br />

Seasonal activity and spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes italicus<br />

population in a natural cave 119<br />

Christian PASTORELLI, Paolo LAGHI & Dino SCARAVELLI<br />

Speleomantes antipredator strategies: a review and new observations 127<br />

Galina V. POLYNOVA & Olga E. POLYNOVA<br />

Tail autotomy as an index <strong>of</strong> human influence on <strong>the</strong><br />

Alsophylax pipiens population in <strong>the</strong> Bogdino-Baskunchak state reserve 133


Biota 3/i-a, 2002<br />

Laura RACCA<br />

The conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Agile Frog Rana dalmatina in Jersey (Channel Islands) 141<br />

Sebastiano SALVIDIO, Gabriele ALARIO, Maura Valeric PASTORINO & Mirko FERRETTI<br />

Seasonal activity and abundance <strong>of</strong> Speleomantes ambrosii in cave habitats 149<br />

Stefano SCALI & Augusto GENTILLI<br />

A comparison <strong>of</strong> main heathlands in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy and <strong>the</strong>ir importance<br />

for amphibian populations 155<br />

Stefano SCALI, Claudia CORTI, Augusto GENTILLI, Luca LUISELLI,<br />

Edoardo RAZZETTI & Marco A.L. ZUFFI<br />

Continental versus Mediterranean European Whip Snake<br />

Hierophis viridiflavus: a morphometric approach 161<br />

Galina. S. SUROVA<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> frog egg aggregations as a control <strong>of</strong> abiotic factors 167<br />

Judit VOROS, Zoltan KORS6S & Ferenc SZALAY<br />

A comparative morphological study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two Hungarian<br />

discoglossid toad species Bombina spp 173<br />

Vit ZAVADIL & Arnost L. SIZLING<br />

Morphological variability in <strong>the</strong> newts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cristatus group 181<br />

Marco A.L. ZUFFI, Augusto GENTILLI, Edoardo RAZZETTI & Stefano SCALI<br />

Transition-hybridization areas in parapatric species<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vipera aspis group from nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy 191<br />

Nove knjige/Book reviews<br />

Milan VOGRIN<br />

CABELA, A., GRILLITSCH, H. & TIEDEMANN (eds.) 2001:<br />

Atlas zur Verbreitung und Okologie der Amphibien und Reptilien in Osterreich 197<br />

Editor acknowledgements 198


Preface<br />

)ta 3/1-2, 2OO2<br />

The third volume <strong>of</strong> Biota is entirely devoted to herpetology. This volume includes 24 contributions<br />

presented during <strong>the</strong> 11th Ordinary General Meeting (OGM) <strong>of</strong> <strong>SEH</strong> - Societas<br />

Europaea Herpetologica.<br />

The OGM in Zalec (Slovenia) was attended by 86 participants from 24 countries who contributed<br />

37 oral presentations and 56 posters. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, as <strong>full</strong> papers, are reproduced<br />

in this volume.<br />

This volume goes to press much later than we expected. This is largely because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sometimes<br />

extensive discussions we had (<strong>the</strong> referees and I) with <strong>the</strong> authors on how to make<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir work more comprehensible. Despite <strong>the</strong> delay, I hope that our readers (and authors as<br />

well) will find <strong>the</strong>se efforts worthwhile.<br />

I am also grateful to all who helped in different ways, both at <strong>the</strong> congress and during <strong>the</strong><br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>proceedings</strong>. Here I wish to thank <strong>the</strong> past president <strong>of</strong> <strong>SEH</strong>, pr<strong>of</strong>. dr.<br />

Wolfgang Bohme, and <strong>the</strong> past and former secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>SEH</strong>, dr. Michael R.K. Lambert, for<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir encouragement and work during <strong>the</strong> congress.<br />

Finally, I wish to mention that for <strong>the</strong> first time at <strong>the</strong> OGM <strong>of</strong> <strong>SEH</strong>, we started with a competition<br />

for "best student talk" and "best student poster". Congratulations Daniela and<br />

Nathalie! Daniela's paper can be found in <strong>the</strong>se <strong>proceedings</strong>.<br />

Thanks also to all referees (see <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> referees) for <strong>the</strong>ir time and help and to all participants<br />

with whom I have (almost with all) very pleasant discussions.<br />

-»»<br />

I hope that we will see you some day in Slovenia again!<br />

Milan Vogrin


CRNOBRNJA - ISAILOVIC BJOta 3/i-a. 2002 9<br />

Notes <strong>of</strong> diurnal activity in Vipera<br />

ammodytes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central Balkans<br />

Jelka CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIC<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> evolutionary biology, Institute for biological research,<br />

29. Novembra 142, 11000 Belgrade, FR Yugoslavia<br />

E-mail: jelka@ibiss.bg.ac.yu<br />

Abstract<br />

Diurnal activity in Vipera ammodytes, <strong>the</strong> most widespread viper in <strong>the</strong> Balkans, was<br />

analysed using a sample <strong>of</strong> records collected from 1981 to 2001 in Serbia and<br />

Montenegro. The inspiration for this study arose from several questions summarized as<br />

one: is it possible to success<strong>full</strong>y define activity <strong>of</strong> specimens in space and time by a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> states <strong>of</strong> several environmental variables? A restricted number <strong>of</strong> measured<br />

environmental variables, as well as spatial/temporal heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> records,<br />

influenced <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study. The results pointed to significantly different diurnal<br />

activity patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sexes in two seasons (spring and summer; p < 0.05). Distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> male and female records in two seasons and three main parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day was also<br />

non-random. The observed differences between male and female diurnal activity patterns<br />

would be <strong>the</strong> consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir reproductive activity schedules during two seasons.<br />

Differences in diurnal activity sensu sTricto seem to be related to insolation regimes<br />

<strong>of</strong> two seasons.<br />

Key words: Vipera ammodytes, Central Balkans, diurnal activity<br />

Received 1 October 2001; accepted 4 November 2001


10 Biota 3 i-:>., ?.oo:>. CRNOBRNJA - ISAILOVIC<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Balkan Peninsula comprises most <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> European part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sand viper's<br />

species area (see in: Crnobrnja-lsailovic &<br />

Haxhiu 1997). In Serbia, this viper was<br />

not recorded north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sava and <strong>the</strong><br />

Danube river flows. Vipera ammodytes<br />

(Figure 1) is a common inhabitant <strong>of</strong><br />

canyons and gorges, as well as <strong>of</strong> areas<br />

belonging to <strong>the</strong> vegetation zone <strong>of</strong><br />

open, mostly oak xerophilous forests in<br />

Serbia and Montenegro. Syntopic reptile<br />

species in <strong>the</strong> continental part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Central Balkans frequently include:<br />

Podarcis mural/s, Lacerta viridis,<br />

Corone/la austriaca, Testudo hermanni,<br />

and in particular habitats also Lacerta<br />

pratico/a pontica, Ab/epharus kitaibelli<br />

and Coluber caspius.<br />

Figure 1. Vipera ammodytes, adult female,<br />

from Sou<strong>the</strong>astern Serbia (photo: J.<br />

Crnobrnja-lsailovic).<br />

Knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sand viper population<br />

dynamic and activity patterns in Serbia<br />

and Montenegro still does not go beyond<br />

<strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> anecdotal observations. My<br />

intention in this study was to arrange diffuse<br />

data into statistically useful information<br />

and to provoke more detailed studies<br />

in <strong>the</strong> future, comparable to those<br />

already done for related species (Money<br />

1994, Zuffi 1999, Ujvari & Korsos 2000).<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Vipera ammodytes was recorded during<br />

<strong>the</strong> author's inventory <strong>of</strong> amphibian and<br />

reptile species in Serbia and Montenegro,<br />

from 1981 to today (Figure 2). The analyzed<br />

area broadly covers <strong>the</strong> geographic<br />

space between 42° and 44°40' North latitude.<br />

The specimens were detected within<br />

a range <strong>of</strong> altitudes 10 - 1600m above sea<br />

level. The quality <strong>of</strong> environmental data<br />

accompanying <strong>the</strong> records varied from<br />

case to case, depending on <strong>the</strong> accessibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> equipment. The terrain was checked<br />

visually during <strong>the</strong> day time by slowly<br />

walking through various habitats along <strong>the</strong><br />

planned transect route. Specimens were<br />

captured and sexed where possible. Some<br />

sand viper habitats were checked from<br />

midnight to 02h A.M., but nocturnal activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species was not detected.<br />

In total, 67 records were accompanied<br />

with data concerning at least one environmental<br />

variable (Table 1). Individuals were<br />

recorded during spring (1 in March, 4 in<br />

April, 14 in May and 2 in <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong><br />

June) and summer (1 in <strong>the</strong> third week <strong>of</strong><br />

June, 43 in July and 2 in August). Among<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, only mature individuals (41) were<br />

chosen for analysis. Juveniles were omitted<br />

from <strong>the</strong> study because overall sample size<br />

was too small for such a structured analysis.<br />

The sex <strong>of</strong> captured animals was recognized<br />

by presence/absence <strong>of</strong><br />

hemipenises. It is worth mentioning that<br />

15 adults were measured before being<br />

released. Their overall size varied from 404<br />

to 670 mm. The records were categorized<br />

according to accompanying variables and<br />

processed through simple (two variables)<br />

and multivariate (more than two variables)<br />

correspondence analyses (Statistica 5.0).<br />

RESULTS<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> ordinary correspondence<br />

analysis (Table 2.) point to different activity<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two sexes: males were<br />

significantly more "visible" during <strong>the</strong>


CRNOBRNJA - ISAILOVIC Biota 3 1-2,2002 11<br />

Figure 2. A. European part <strong>of</strong> V. ammodytes species area. B. Location <strong>of</strong> records used in this<br />

analysis.


12 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 CRNOBRNJA - ISAILOVIC<br />

Table 1. Variables processed through various correspondence analyses.<br />

Variable<br />

Sex<br />

Season<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day<br />

Exposure<br />

Behaviour<br />

spring, while females were more<br />

"exposed" during <strong>the</strong> summer (Table 3).<br />

Differences in activity patterns between<br />

sexes in relation to o<strong>the</strong>r environmental<br />

variables were not detected. Also, <strong>the</strong><br />

results suggest that <strong>the</strong> activity time <strong>of</strong><br />

adult sand vipers generally differs<br />

between two seasons (p < 0.05): during<br />

<strong>the</strong> spring, <strong>the</strong> sand vipers were usually<br />

seen in <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day, and during<br />

<strong>the</strong> summer, mostly in <strong>the</strong> morning hours<br />

(Table 3). The results <strong>of</strong> multiple correspondence<br />

analysis pointed to significant<br />

association <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different sexes with<br />

two seasons (spring and summer) and<br />

three main parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day (Table 2):<br />

males were more <strong>of</strong>ten noticed in <strong>the</strong><br />

spring middays and females in summer<br />

mornings (Figure 2). Analysis, which<br />

included sets <strong>of</strong> four as well as all five<br />

Category<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Spring<br />

(21stMarch-23rdJune)<br />

Summer<br />

(23rd June-20111 September)<br />

Morning<br />

(07A.M. - 1 1 A.M.)<br />

Midday<br />

(11A.M.-04P.M.)<br />

Afternoon<br />

(04PM. - 08 P.M.)<br />

South<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

East<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

North<br />

West<br />

Taking res tin shade<br />

Basking<br />

Moving<br />

Hiding<br />

Escaping<br />

Mating<br />

N° <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

16<br />

19<br />

21<br />

46<br />

14<br />

20<br />

7<br />

10<br />

8<br />

12<br />

1<br />

4<br />

3<br />

9<br />

8<br />

4<br />

2<br />

11<br />

2<br />

recorded variables, also showed significant<br />

non-random associations (Table 2).<br />

However, it is important to mention that<br />

no statistical significance tests are customarily<br />

applied to <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> a correspondence<br />

analysis; <strong>the</strong> primary purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> technique is to produce a simplified<br />

(low-dimensional) representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

information in a large frequency table.<br />

Increasing <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> variables diminishes<br />

discrimination power when <strong>the</strong><br />

sample is relatively small (Table 2). For<br />

that reason I avoided interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

results where more than three variables<br />

were tested for associations.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Seasonal differences in activity patterns<br />

among sexes were observed in European<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> several viperide species


CRNOBRNJA - ISAILOVIC BJOta 3/1-2, 2002 13<br />

Table 2. A summary <strong>of</strong> simple correspondence analysis. Df = degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom; P = probability;<br />

n.s.=non-significant; *=p < 0.05; ***=p < 0.001<br />

Variables<br />

Sex X Season<br />

Sex X part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day<br />

Sex X exposition<br />

Sex X behavior<br />

Season X part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day<br />

Season X exposition<br />

Season X behavior<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day X exposition<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day X behavior<br />

Exposition X behavior<br />

SIMPLE CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS<br />

X2 test value<br />

5.57<br />

5.35<br />

5.89<br />

6.68<br />

7.98<br />

9.31<br />

5.82<br />

16.05<br />

11.70<br />

26.33<br />

df<br />

1<br />

2<br />

5<br />

5<br />

2<br />

6<br />

5<br />

12<br />

10<br />

20<br />

P<br />

0.0182<br />

0.0689<br />

0.2452<br />

0.2452<br />

0.0185<br />

0.1570<br />

0.3246<br />

0.1890<br />

0.3059<br />

0.1553<br />

significance<br />

A<br />

MULTIPLE CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS<br />

Sex X season X part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day<br />

Total inertia<br />

1.333<br />

Dimensions<br />

4<br />

Total X2<br />

135.345 36<br />

df<br />

P<br />

0.000<br />

significance<br />

***<br />

No. Dim. Singular<br />

value<br />

Eigenvalue %Inertia Cumulative% X2<br />

1<br />

0.751 0.564 42.26 42.26 57.20<br />

2<br />

0.613 0.376 28.21 70.48 38.18<br />

3<br />

0.462 0.214 .^ 16.03 86.50 21.69<br />

Sex X season X part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day X exposition<br />

Total inertia<br />

2.500<br />

Dimensions<br />

10<br />

Total X2<br />

317.228<br />

df<br />

169<br />

P<br />

0.000<br />

significance<br />

***<br />

No. Dim. Singular<br />

value<br />

Eigenvalue %Inertia Cumulative% X2<br />

1<br />

0.734 0.538 21.53 21.53 68.31<br />

2<br />

0.683 0.467 18.67 40.20 59.22<br />

3<br />

0.574 0.329 13.16 53.36 41.76<br />

Sex x season X part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day X exposition x behavior<br />

Total inertia<br />

2.600<br />

Dimensions<br />

13<br />

Total X2<br />

401.404 289<br />

Df<br />

P<br />

0.000<br />

significance<br />

***<br />

No. Dim. Singular<br />

value<br />

Eigenvalue %Inertia Cumulative% X2<br />

1<br />

0.739 0.546 21.01 21.01 84.35<br />

2<br />

0.638 0.407 15.67 36.68 62.90<br />

3<br />

0.604 0.365 14.04 50.73 56.38<br />

(recently: Biella & Volkl 1993 for Vipera<br />

berus; Bonnet & Naulleau, 1993, Saint<br />

Girons 1994, Monney 1994 and Zuffi<br />

1999 for Vipera aspis; Baron 1997 for<br />

Vipera ursinii ursinii). Generally, <strong>the</strong> earlier<br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> male vipers from hiber-<br />

n.s.<br />

n.s.<br />

n.s.<br />

*<br />

n.s.<br />

n.s.<br />

n.s.<br />

n.s.<br />

n.s.<br />

nation was explained by <strong>the</strong>ir need for<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> spermatogenesis (Nilson<br />

1980). It was also noted that pregnant<br />

females are more easily seen during <strong>the</strong><br />

summer than non-reproductive females<br />

or adult males (Andren, 1985). Having in


14 Biota 3 1-2, aooa CRNOBRNJA - ISAILOVIC<br />

Table 3. Percent <strong>of</strong> records within categories sex and time in two seasons.<br />

Sex<br />

Males<br />

Females<br />

Total<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day<br />

Morning<br />

Midday<br />

Afternoon<br />

Total<br />

Spring<br />

75%<br />

25%<br />

100%<br />

8%<br />

64%<br />

28%<br />

100%<br />

Summer<br />

33%<br />

67%<br />

100%<br />

52%<br />

38%<br />

10%<br />

100%<br />

Figure 3. Associations <strong>of</strong> records having different categories <strong>of</strong> variables SEX, SEASON and<br />

PART OF THE DAY in <strong>the</strong> space described by <strong>the</strong> first two correspondent axes.<br />

E<br />

0<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

-0.5<br />

-1.0<br />

-1.5<br />

-2.0<br />

-2.5<br />

-1.5<br />

2D Plot <strong>of</strong> Column Coordinates. Dimension: 1 x 2<br />

Input Table (Rows x Columns). 7x7 (Burt Table)<br />

MALES<br />

MIDDAY<br />

AFTERNOON<br />

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5<br />

mind poor quality <strong>of</strong> input data in this<br />

study (<strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> consistent longterm<br />

monitoring in <strong>the</strong> same habitat), I<br />

can only suppose that sand viper males in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Central Balkans are more active in <strong>the</strong><br />

spring searching for territory and for<br />

mates, like <strong>the</strong>ir relatives. For V.<br />

ammodytes, such behavior has been sporadically<br />

noticed in <strong>the</strong> field but still is not<br />

statistically confirmed or rejected by<br />

Dimension 1, Eigenvalue: .56349 (42.26% <strong>of</strong> Inertia)<br />

1.0 1.5<br />

appropriate experiments. Ritual male<br />

combats are also observed in this species<br />

(Steward 1971).<br />

The fact that most sand viper females<br />

were recorded in <strong>the</strong> summer logically<br />

points to <strong>the</strong>ir reproductive status: breeding<br />

in V. ammodytes in <strong>the</strong> continental<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central Balkans takes place in<br />

<strong>the</strong> spring (I have records <strong>of</strong> courtship at


CRNOBRNJA - ISAILOVIC Biota 3/i-a, 2002 15<br />

<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> April in 1984 in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area studied, but I have also<br />

seen courtship at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> May 1996 in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part); also, <strong>the</strong> female<br />

caught at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> August 1997 at<br />

1200m above sea level had signs <strong>of</strong><br />

recent parturition. Accordingly, pregnancy<br />

<strong>of</strong> sand viper females in <strong>the</strong> study area<br />

lasts through <strong>the</strong> summer months.<br />

Parturition probably happens earlier at<br />

lower altitudes - from <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

August in lowland areas to <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong><br />

August/beginning <strong>of</strong> September in habitats<br />

near <strong>the</strong> upper altitudinal limit.<br />

Pregnant females need more energy<br />

input than males or non-reproductive<br />

females, so <strong>the</strong>y spend more time basking<br />

(Bozhanskii & Kudryavcev 1986, Andren<br />

1985 for V. berus). I collected most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

summer data during July (<strong>the</strong> presumed<br />

pregnancy period) and females predominated<br />

among <strong>the</strong> specimens observed.<br />

Consequently, one can suppose that most<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sand viper females observed during<br />

<strong>the</strong> summer months in <strong>the</strong> Central<br />

Balkans were pregnant.<br />

Significant differences in time <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

among males and females <strong>of</strong> V.<br />

ammodytes in Serbia and Montenegro<br />

seem to be a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

differences between <strong>the</strong> two seasons<br />

in <strong>the</strong> temperate climatic region. A large<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> snakes' motion in space is<br />

connected with choosing <strong>the</strong> optimum<br />

insolation regime (Bozhanskii &<br />

Kudryavcev 1986). The early morning<br />

hours during <strong>the</strong> spring in this region are<br />

still too cold for helio<strong>the</strong>rmic reptile<br />

species, while summer mornings are more<br />

favorable for daily activities. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

hand, midday is <strong>the</strong> most comfortable<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day in <strong>the</strong> spring, while in <strong>the</strong><br />

summer many reptile species usually<br />

spend <strong>the</strong> warmest part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir dens.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

My colleagues Dr. Marco Zuffi (Pisa) and Dr Jens B. Rasmussen (Copenhagen) helped<br />

greatly with <strong>the</strong>ir suggestions about literature. I would also like to thank <strong>the</strong> anonymous<br />

reviewers for constructive comments, and Oliver Isailovic for careful preparation <strong>of</strong> illustrations.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANDREN, C. 1985: Risk <strong>of</strong> predation in male and female adders, Vipera berus (Linne).<br />

Amphibia-Reptilia 6: 203-206.<br />

BARON, J. - P. 1997: Demographie et dynamique d' une population francaise de Vipera<br />

ursinii ursinii (Bonaparte, 1835). These de Doctorat, Ecole Pratique des Hautes<br />

Etudes, 201 p.<br />

BIELLA, H-J. & VOLKL, W. 1993: Die Biologie der Kreuzotter (Vipera berus, L. 1758) in<br />

Mitteleuropa - ein kurzer Uberblick. Mertensiella 3: 311-318.<br />

BONNET, X. & NAULLEAU, G. 1993. Relations entre la glycemie et I' activite saisonniere<br />

chez Vipera aspis L. Amphibia-Reptilia 14: 295-306.<br />

BOZHANSKII, AT. & KUDRYAVCEV, S.V. 1986: Ecological Observations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rare Vipers<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caucasus. In: Rocek, Z. (ed.) Studies in Herpetology: 495-498.<br />

CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIC, J. & HAXHIU, I. 1997: Vipera ammodytes. In: Case, J..-P,<br />

CABELA, A. , CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIC, J., DOLMEN, D., GROSSENBACHER, K.,<br />

HAFFNER, P., LESCURE, J., MARTENS, H., MARTINEZ-RICA, J.P., MAURIN, H.,<br />

OLIVEIRA, M.E., SOFIANIDOU, T.S., VEITH, M. & ZUIDERWIJK, A. (eds.) Atlas<br />

<strong>of</strong> amphibians and reptiles in Europe. <strong>SEH</strong> &MNHN (IEGP/SPN), Paris.<br />

MONNEY, J.-C. 1994: Comparaison des cycles annuels d'activite de Vipera aspis et Vipera<br />

berus (Ophidia, Viperidae) dans une station des Prealpes Bernoises (ouest de la


16 Biota 3 1-2,2002 CRNOBRNJA - ISAILOVIC<br />

Suisse). Bull.Soc.Herp. Fr. 71-72: 49-61.<br />

NILSOIM, G. 1980. Male Reproductive Cycle <strong>of</strong> European Adder, Vipera berus, and its<br />

Relation to Annual Activity Periods. Copeia 4: 729-737.<br />

SAINT-GIRONS, H. 1994: Les risques de predation lies a la reproduction chez un Viperidae<br />

ovovivipare, Vipera aspis L, d' apres les observations visuelles. Amphibia-Reptilia<br />

15:413-416.<br />

STEWARD, J.W. 1971: The snakes <strong>of</strong> Europe. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. Press, Ru<strong>the</strong>rford-<br />

Madison-Teancek.<br />

UJVARI, B., KORSOS, Z. & PECHY, T. 2000: Life history, population characteristics and conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hungarian meadow viper (Vipera ursinii rakosiensis). Amphibia-<br />

Reptilia 21: 267-278.<br />

ZUFFI, M. A. L. 1999: Activity patterns in a viviparous snake, Vipera aspis (L.), from<br />

Mediterranean central Italy. Amphibia-Reptilia 20: 313-318.


CEIRANS Biota 3/1-2.2002 17<br />

Reptiles and amphibians <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Gauja National Park, Latvia<br />

Andris CEIRANS<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology and Animal Ecology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Latvia<br />

Kronvalda bulv. 4, Riga LV-1586, Latvia<br />

E-mail: andrisc@lanet.lv<br />

Abstract<br />

An inventory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> herpet<strong>of</strong>auna <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park, located in <strong>the</strong> north-central<br />

part <strong>of</strong> Latvia, was carried out in 1999-2000. Its objectives were to determine<br />

species composition, status, and habitat preferences. The main attention was focussed<br />

on reptiles. Data were collected along transects located throughout <strong>the</strong> territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Park. The total length <strong>of</strong> transects was 166.2 km, and numerous separate observations<br />

<strong>of</strong> various species were also recorded. Common and widespread species were Lacerta<br />

vivipara, Bufo bufo, Rana temporaria, and Rana synklepton esculenta. Anguis fragilis<br />

was found mostly in a dry pine, pine-spruce forest on <strong>the</strong> terrace <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ancient valley<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gauja River. A large population <strong>of</strong> Matrix natrix was found in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Park in deciduous and coniferous forests. A few populations <strong>of</strong> Lacerta agiliswere found<br />

in dry pine forests, and on <strong>the</strong> banks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja River. Rana atvalis was a rare species,<br />

more frequently found in high moors. There were also several records <strong>of</strong> Triturus cristatus<br />

and T. vulgaris in <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park. The required conservation activities are<br />

discussed.<br />

Key words: reptiles, amphibians, habitats, Gauja National Park, Latvia<br />

Received 6 September 2001; accepted 28 October 2001


ta 3/1-2, 2OO2 CEIRANS<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Gauja National Park is located in <strong>the</strong><br />

north-central part <strong>of</strong> Latvia, about 35 km<br />

north-west <strong>of</strong> RTga. The Park was established<br />

in 1973, and it was <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> second<br />

National Park in <strong>the</strong> territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

former USSR. The area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park is<br />

91,745 ha; forest occupies 48,592 ha<br />

(Pilats 2000). The area is dissected by <strong>the</strong><br />

ancient valley <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja River, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with valleys <strong>of</strong> its numerous tributaries<br />

and side ravines. Gauja National Park is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> florally richest regions in<br />

Latvia, with a high diversity <strong>of</strong> forests.<br />

The largest proportion <strong>of</strong> old broadleaved<br />

forests in Latvia is found near <strong>the</strong><br />

town <strong>of</strong> Sigulda (Pilats 2000). However,<br />

boreal coniferous forests dominate <strong>the</strong><br />

Park. The largest high moor is Sudas-<br />

Zviedru mire (2575 ha), found in <strong>the</strong><br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> Gauja National Park.<br />

There are also several smaller mires in <strong>the</strong><br />

central and nor<strong>the</strong>rn parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park.<br />

Agricultural landscapes, although occupying<br />

a large part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park, are fragmented<br />

by many forest stands, shrubs,<br />

and fallow lands that serve as refuges for<br />

wild animals. Gauja National Park also<br />

includes many historically significant<br />

objects and popular tourist sites.<br />

The present survey is part <strong>of</strong> a large-scale<br />

inventory <strong>of</strong> flora, fauna and habitats <strong>of</strong><br />

Gauja National Park carried out in 1999<br />

and 2000. The aim <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inventory <strong>of</strong><br />

herpet<strong>of</strong>auna was to determine <strong>the</strong><br />

species composition and status <strong>of</strong> reptile<br />

and amphibian species, and to describe<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir habitats in <strong>the</strong> Park. The main<br />

attention was focussed on reptiles,<br />

because studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se animals in<br />

Latvia have been very few and since<br />

information on <strong>the</strong>ir preferred habitats is<br />

limited.<br />

METHODS<br />

Data was collected mainly on transects in<br />

<strong>the</strong> field seasons <strong>of</strong> 1999 (from 06.08. to<br />

08.09.) and 2000 (from 17.04. to<br />

14.07). The total length <strong>of</strong> transects was<br />

166.2 km. Censuses were carried out in<br />

all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main habitat groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park<br />

(Table 1). The type <strong>of</strong> habitat was determined<br />

from short descriptions made in<br />

<strong>the</strong> field. This information was supplemented<br />

by data from forest plans <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

State Forest Service. The syntaxonomical<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> Latvian forests has not<br />

yet been <strong>full</strong>y developed (Prieditis 1999),<br />

and is <strong>the</strong>refore supplemented (Table 1)<br />

by <strong>the</strong> forest stand classification applied<br />

in <strong>the</strong> forestry industry (Buss 1997). The<br />

transects were evenly distributed<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> area. Therefore, <strong>the</strong><br />

transect length for a particular habitat is<br />

roughly proportional to <strong>the</strong> area that <strong>the</strong><br />

habitat occupies in <strong>the</strong> Park. An exception<br />

was agricultural landscapes, which<br />

were considerably less represented in<br />

transects (31.0 % <strong>of</strong> total transect length<br />

in comparison to 45 % coverage in <strong>the</strong><br />

Park).<br />

The routes were carried out in warm and<br />

dry wea<strong>the</strong>r, as <strong>the</strong> main attention was<br />

focussed on reptiles. Each observation <strong>of</strong><br />

'a reptile or amphibian was mapped at a<br />

1:50.000 scale. For every reptile specimen<br />

observed, a brief description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

site was made, and in most cases it was<br />

supplemented later with information<br />

from <strong>the</strong> data base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State Forest<br />

Service. Transects were located mostly<br />

along sites with potentially highest reptile<br />

density (roadsides, fringes, cuttings,<br />

clearings etc.), and extrapolation <strong>of</strong> this<br />

data to <strong>the</strong> whole habitat could provide<br />

misleading results. Densities were used<br />

only for Anguis fragilis and Lacerta vivipara<br />

for comparing various habitats. To<br />

describe <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Common<br />

Lizard Lacerta vivipara in habitats, two<br />

parameters were used: <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> individuals and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

records. As <strong>the</strong> movement range for<br />

Lacerta vivipara is up to 80 m<br />

(Zarnolodchikov & Avilova 1989), two<br />

records were considered to be separate if


CEIRANS 3/1-2, 2OO2 19<br />

Table 1. Transect length <strong>of</strong> different habitats <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park<br />

Plant communities after Prieditis 1999* and Kabucis 2000**, forest types after Buds 1997.<br />

Habitat<br />

Dry pine forests on poor sandy<br />

soil<br />

Dry mesotrophic pine and pinespruce<br />

forests<br />

Dry mesotrophic spruce forests<br />

Moist eutrophic broad-leaved<br />

forests<br />

High moors with pine and pine<br />

forests on wet peat<br />

Degraded high moors and pine<br />

forests on drained peat<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r wet forest types<br />

Edges <strong>of</strong> dry pine, pine-spruce<br />

forests<br />

Edges <strong>of</strong> dry spruce and leaf<br />

tree forests<br />

Agricultural landscapes,<br />

meadows and shrubs<br />

Total<br />

Plant community<br />

Cladonio-Pinetum,Vaccinio<br />

vitis-idaeae-Pinetum*<br />

Vaccinio myrtilli-Pinetum,<br />

several types not classified<br />

yet*<br />

Oxalido-Piceetum exeelsae*<br />

Querco-Tilietum*<br />

Sphagnion<br />

magellanici**,Vaccinio<br />

uliginosi-Pinetum*<br />

not classified yet*<br />

<strong>the</strong> distance between individuals was<br />

more than 100 meters. This served to<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> occasional observa- ~~*l<br />

tions <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> individuals at<br />

<strong>the</strong> same site due to higher activity in<br />

optimal wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions or better visibility<br />

for <strong>the</strong> observer. Juveniles were<br />

excluded from <strong>the</strong>se data. In <strong>the</strong> analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> dominant tree species in habitats, data<br />

acquired from transect censuses were<br />

supplemented with descriptions <strong>of</strong><br />

twelve locations where <strong>the</strong> reptile<br />

species were observed outside transects.<br />

For amphibians, <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> habitat was<br />

determined later from State Forest<br />

Service forest plans and its data base.<br />

Amphibians along transects were not<br />

counted, and densities were not calculated<br />

in cases when numerous individuals<br />

were observed. The transect method was<br />

not applied for <strong>the</strong> recording <strong>of</strong> newts,<br />

and information on <strong>the</strong>se animals was<br />

collected occasionally.<br />

Species distribution maps were prepared<br />

using <strong>the</strong> Baltic Co-ordinate System,<br />

Forest type<br />

Cladinoso-callunosa,<br />

Vaccinosa<br />

Myrtillosa,<br />

Hylocomiosa<br />

Oxalidosa<br />

Aegopodiosa<br />

moor, Sphagnosa,<br />

Caricoso-phragmitosa<br />

Callunosa turf, me).,<br />

Vaccinosa turf. mel.<br />

Myrtilloso-sphagnosa,<br />

Dryopterioso-caricosa<br />

Myrtillosa,<br />

Hylocomiosa<br />

Oxalidosa,<br />

Aegopodiosa<br />

Transect length,<br />

km (%)<br />

2.8(1.7)<br />

78.1 (47.0)<br />

9.3 (5.6)<br />

2.3(1.4)<br />

8.4(5.1)<br />

1.7(1.0)<br />

1.1 (0.7)<br />

7.5 (4.5)<br />

3.4(2.0)<br />

51.6(31.0)<br />

166.2 (100.0)<br />

Transverse Mercator Projection (TM-<br />

1993). The number <strong>of</strong> 1x1 km squares <strong>of</strong><br />

this Co-ordinate System, in which<br />

species were observed, was used to estimate<br />

<strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> various species in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park. A total <strong>of</strong> 269<br />

or 27.5 % <strong>of</strong> all 1x1 km squares <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Park were visited in <strong>the</strong> survey. The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> squares is not necessary<br />

identical to <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> locations indicated<br />

for species in <strong>the</strong> results, as several<br />

locations in <strong>the</strong> same square are possible.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Six reptile and five amphibian species<br />

were found during <strong>the</strong> survey. At least<br />

one species was observed in 201 or 74.7<br />

% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> visited 1x1 km squares.<br />

Observation frequency for <strong>the</strong> various<br />

species is shown in Table 2.<br />

Reptiles<br />

The Sand Lizard Lacerta agilis was found<br />

in 2 areas: dry pine Pinus sylvestris forest


20 3/1-2, 2OO2 CEIRANS<br />

Table 2. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> reptiles and amphibians in 1x1 km squares <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic Co-ordinate<br />

System that were crossed by transects in <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park<br />

Species<br />

Reptiles<br />

Lacerta agilis<br />

Lacerta vivipara<br />

Anguis fragilis<br />

Natrix natrix<br />

Vipera bents<br />

Amphibians<br />

Triturus cristatus<br />

Triturus vulgaris<br />

Bufo bufo<br />

Rana arvalis<br />

Rana temporaria<br />

Rana synklepton esculenta<br />

in <strong>the</strong> south-western part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park (2<br />

locations), and banks and terraces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

river Gauja and smaller tributaries in <strong>the</strong><br />

central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park (5 locations).<br />

The habitats <strong>of</strong> Lacerta agilis can be<br />

grouped in two types:<br />

1. low and sparse Pinus sylvestris growing<br />

(sometimes mixed with birch Betula<br />

spp. and spruce Picea abies) on dry sand,<br />

with a tree height <strong>of</strong> 2-7 m and canopy<br />

cover <strong>of</strong> 10-30 %; herb layer dominated<br />

by grasses (Poa, Festuca, Calamagrostis)<br />

and, in some cases, with horsetail<br />

(Equisetum); herb cover <strong>of</strong> 10-50%;<br />

habitat found on <strong>the</strong> banks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river<br />

and in some disturbed habitats (such as<br />

old sand quarries) on terrace (5 locations);<br />

2. fringes <strong>of</strong> dry and tall pine forest<br />

(Vaccinio vitis-idaeae - Pinetum,<br />

Vacdnio myrtilli - Pinetum associations)<br />

on sandy soil on terrace (2 locations).<br />

The Common Lizard Lacerta vivipara was<br />

more or less evenly distributed throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

squares<br />

6<br />

59<br />

3<br />

9<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

91<br />

8<br />

133<br />

40<br />

% <strong>of</strong> visited<br />

squares<br />

2.2<br />

21.9<br />

3.0<br />

3.3<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

33.8<br />

3.0<br />

49.4<br />

14.9<br />

Park. This species was observed in most<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> habitats, except some types <strong>of</strong><br />

forest. The highest density was in high<br />

""moors and wet pine forests on peat,<br />

especially in drained sites, and along <strong>the</strong><br />

fringes <strong>of</strong> various dry forests (Table 3).<br />

The dominant tree species in Lacerta<br />

vivipara wet forest habitats usually was<br />

pine Pinus sylvestris, while deciduous<br />

trees (Betula spp., Populus tremula,<br />

Quercus robur, Tilia cordata) were characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> open habitats with separate<br />

trees or small groups <strong>of</strong> trees, such as in<br />

open agricultural landscapes.<br />

Lacerta vivipara preferred forest habitats,<br />

especially mature dry forest, where it<br />

was observed exclusively on relatively<br />

open sites such as forest clearcuts, grassy<br />

roadsides, banks, fringes and sites with<br />

large gaps in <strong>the</strong> forest canopy.<br />

The Slow Worm Anguis fragilis was<br />

found rarely, in upland pine dominated<br />

forest areas in <strong>the</strong> whole territory, and<br />

only in dry forest types. Specimens were<br />

usually observed on or near paths. Two


CEIRANS 3/1-2, 2OO2 21<br />

Table 3. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> Lacerta vivipara on transects in various habitats.<br />

Only <strong>the</strong> habitats where species were found are included in <strong>the</strong> list. The first value indicates<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> observations, <strong>the</strong> second - density <strong>of</strong> findings. For <strong>the</strong> transect<br />

length in <strong>the</strong> habitat see Table 1. Separate observations that were made outside <strong>the</strong><br />

transects are not included.<br />

Habitat<br />

Dry mesotrophic pine and pine-spruce forests<br />

High moors with pine and pine forests on wet peat<br />

Degraded high moors and pine forests on drained peat<br />

Fringes <strong>of</strong> dry pine, pine-spruce forests<br />

Fringes <strong>of</strong> dry spruce and leaf tree forests<br />

Agricultural landscapes, meadows and shrubs<br />

locations (or 0.71 records/km) were in<br />

pine forest on poor sandy soil (association<br />

Vaccinia vitis-idaeae - Pinetum),<br />

and seven locations (0.09 records/km) in<br />

pine and pine-spruce forest on<br />

mesotrophic soil. Pinus sylvestris was <strong>the</strong><br />

dominant tree species in all locations.<br />

The Grass Snake Natrix natrix was regularly<br />

observed in <strong>the</strong> south-western part<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park, particularly near Sigulda.<br />

The species inhabited <strong>the</strong> following habitats:<br />

young and patchy Alnus incana and<br />

Betula stands and meadows with pools<br />

located on <strong>the</strong> bed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ancient Gauja<br />

river valley (5 locations), old broadleaved<br />

forests with Fraxinus excelsior,<br />

Quercus robur, and Ulmus glabra on <strong>the</strong><br />

slopes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> valley (association Querco-<br />

Tilietum, 2 locations), and dry<br />

mesotrophic pine and pine-spruce<br />

forests on terraces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> valley (4 locations).<br />

In forest habitats, it was usually<br />

found in habitat edges and roadsides.<br />

There were also some records <strong>of</strong> Natrix<br />

natrix in 1985-1987 from o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Park, mostly along <strong>the</strong> Gauja River<br />

(Z. Bruneniece, unpublished Bachelor's<br />

<strong>the</strong>sis).<br />

The Adder Vipera berus was found in<br />

only two locations during <strong>the</strong> survey. The<br />

first was on <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> a clay quarry<br />

with young and sparse Betula and Picea<br />

abies, with Calluna vulgaris in <strong>the</strong><br />

ground cover. This site was located on a<br />

Records<br />

12/0.15<br />

5/0.60<br />

3/1.79<br />

5/0.67<br />

2/0.59<br />

15/0.29<br />

Individuals<br />

15/0.19<br />

5/0.60<br />

8/4.71<br />

5/0.67<br />

2/0.59<br />

17/0.33<br />

slope with western exposure, within dry<br />

mesotrophic pine and spruce forests in<br />

<strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park. The o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

observation <strong>of</strong> Vipera berus was made<br />

about 500 m outside <strong>the</strong> eastern border<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park, on <strong>the</strong> grassy railway<br />

embankment near a young Betula-Salix-<br />

Alnus incana stand in a hilly landscape.<br />

Vipera berus is also present in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

part <strong>of</strong> Sudas-Zviedru mire<br />

(observed by M. Deicmane); however,<br />

<strong>the</strong> species was not detected <strong>the</strong>re during<br />

<strong>the</strong> transect counts.<br />

Amphibians<br />

Two species were common on transects,<br />

and were found in various habitats<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> entire territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Park - <strong>the</strong> Common Toad Bufo bufo and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Common Frog Rana temporaria.<br />

Rana temporaria was <strong>the</strong> dominant<br />

species in all natural habitats, except for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Sudas-Zviedru high moor and sometimes<br />

also <strong>the</strong> broad-leaved forests on<br />

<strong>the</strong> slopes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja River valley. Bufo<br />

bufo were fewer in number than Rana<br />

temporaria in all dry forest habitats, with<br />

<strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> a few cases in broadleaved<br />

forest on valley slopes (association<br />

Querco-Tilietum). This species was<br />

infrequent on high moors and in wet<br />

pine forests on peat. Both Bufo bufo and<br />

Rana temporaria were relatively common<br />

on agricultural landscapes, especial-


22 Biota 3/1-2,2002 CEIRANS<br />

ly Bufo bufo, which was a usual inhabitant<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local villages. Both species<br />

were absent in <strong>the</strong> driest fragments <strong>of</strong><br />

pine forests on sandy soil (association<br />

Cladinio-Pinetum).<br />

Green frogs Rana synklepton esculenta<br />

were common in aquatic and semi-aquatic<br />

habitats in forest and agricultural landscapes,<br />

especially wet habitats with many<br />

pools. Green frogs were usual inhabitants<br />

<strong>of</strong> ponds on agricultural farms. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> examined individuals belonged to <strong>the</strong><br />

Pool Frog Rana lessonae; a few specimens<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Green Frog Rana esculenta<br />

were found in <strong>the</strong> largest lake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park<br />

(Ungura Lake, 394 ha).<br />

The Moor Frog Rana arvalis was a rare<br />

species; a few individuals were occasionally<br />

observed in <strong>the</strong> entire territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Park. It was more common in <strong>the</strong> central<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sudas-Zviedru mire, <strong>the</strong><br />

largest high moor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National<br />

Park, and in <strong>the</strong> surrounding wet forest<br />

where it was <strong>the</strong> dominant amphibian<br />

species.<br />

Amphibian roadkills are fairly common in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park, especially <strong>of</strong><br />

Bufo bufo. The number <strong>of</strong> killed individuals<br />

<strong>of</strong> this species on country roads during<br />

spring migration in one case<br />

(26.04.2000) reached 43 toads on a<br />

0.025 km long road span, and in two<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r cases (17.04.2000 and<br />

17.05.2000), <strong>the</strong>re were 11 and 12 killed<br />

toads per 0.035 and 1.5 km, respectively.<br />

Separate killed individuals <strong>of</strong> this species<br />

were a common sight in or near human<br />

settlements. Brown frogs were seldom<br />

killed on roads, but on one day<br />

(17.05.2000), 11 dead frogs per km were<br />

recorded.<br />

Two newt species were found at one<br />

location each. A dead specimen <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Great Crested Newt Triturus cristatus was<br />

found on a road on <strong>the</strong> outskirts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

town <strong>of</strong> Cesis. The road is located<br />

between a wet deciduous tree forest area<br />

and a garden area. There have been also<br />

reports from zoologists (V. Pilats, A.<br />

Minde) about findings in four o<strong>the</strong>r locations<br />

in ponds near or in human settlements.<br />

Larvae <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Smooth Newt<br />

Triturus vulgaris were found in <strong>the</strong> central<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park in a small forest lake with<br />

swampy banks surrounded by wet pine<br />

forest. There are two reports (from M.<br />

Deicmane, M. Kalnins) about findings in<br />

human settlements.<br />

Comments on some o<strong>the</strong>r species<br />

In 1988, a few individuals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fire-bellied<br />

Toad Bombina bombina were<br />

observed (by S. Inberga) near Sigulda in a<br />

popular tourist area, but <strong>the</strong> species has<br />

not survived in this location. Apparently<br />

<strong>the</strong> observed individuals were released by<br />

man. Bombina bombina in Latvia is on<br />

<strong>the</strong> periphery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution, and <strong>the</strong><br />

species inhabits only <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong><br />

Latvia - Bauska and Daugavpils Districts<br />

(unpublished data).<br />

The Natterjack Toad Bufo calamita was<br />

found (by M. Kalnins) in <strong>the</strong> 1990s in two<br />

locations within a few kilometres <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

"Sou<strong>the</strong>rn border <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National<br />

Park, and <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> this species in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Park is highly possible.<br />

There are records <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Pond<br />

Turtle Emys orbicularis in 1914 and 1925<br />

in <strong>the</strong> territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present-day Gauja<br />

National Park (Silins, Lamsters 1934).<br />

Since <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong>re have been no new<br />

records <strong>of</strong> this species, in spite <strong>of</strong> well<br />

developed tourism in <strong>the</strong> Park. In Latvia,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re have been rare but regular findings<br />

<strong>of</strong> Emys orbicularis in various regions. In<br />

most cases, <strong>the</strong>se animals were possibly<br />

released by man, but in a few locations in<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn Latvia (Daugavpils and Dobele<br />

. districts) this species is observed regularly<br />

(personal communications by E. Tone, M.<br />

Pupins) and small populations <strong>of</strong> this<br />

species are expected <strong>the</strong>re.


CEIRANS Biota 3/i-2, 2OO2 23<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

A survey using methods similar to those<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present study was carried out in<br />

1994-1997 in <strong>the</strong> Kemeri National Park<br />

(Ceirans, in press). That National Park is<br />

located in <strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> Latvia, but<br />

only 15 % <strong>of</strong> its territory is covered by<br />

agricultural land and human settlements<br />

(compared to 45 % in <strong>the</strong> Gauja National<br />

Park). The frequency <strong>of</strong> records (% <strong>of</strong> visited<br />

1x1 km squares where species was<br />

found) for Lacerta vivipara, L. agilis and<br />

Vipera berus was about <strong>the</strong> same in both<br />

Parks. The frequency for Anguis fragilis<br />

and Matrix natrix records was respectively<br />

about 3 and 5 times higher in <strong>the</strong><br />

Kemeri National Park. For <strong>the</strong> latter<br />

species, this difference is probably associated<br />

with climatic differences.<br />

The large proportion <strong>of</strong> agricultural landscapes<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park affects<br />

to a great extent <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> species.<br />

Four species <strong>of</strong> reptiles and amphibians<br />

(Lacerta vivipara, Bufo bufo, Rana ternporaria,<br />

and Rana synklepton esculenta)<br />

are common and widespread in <strong>the</strong><br />

whole territory. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species are*»<br />

typical <strong>of</strong> agricultural landscapes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Park, where farming methods are not as<br />

intensive as in Western Europe or in some<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r Latvian regions. The remaining<br />

species are not adapted to <strong>the</strong>se landscapes<br />

(Anguis fragilis, Vipera berus,<br />

Triturus vulgaris, Triturus cristatus) or<br />

(and) are near <strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir climatic<br />

tolerance (Lacerta agilis, Natrix natrix),<br />

which are <strong>the</strong> reasons for <strong>the</strong>ir rarity.<br />

Rana arvalis was found in <strong>the</strong> same habitats<br />

as Rana temporaria, but usually in<br />

considerably lower numbers (excepting<br />

for some high moor areas). Among frogs<br />

killed on roads in spring 1999-2000 in <strong>the</strong><br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park,<br />

not far from <strong>the</strong> Sudas-Zviedru high moor<br />

(I. Valikova, unpublished Bachelor's <strong>the</strong>sis),<br />

Rana arvalis and R. temporaria individuals<br />

were found in proportions from<br />

1:5 to 1:10.<br />

The Adder Vipera berus population is<br />

probably declining in <strong>the</strong> Gauja National<br />

Park. In a survey carried out in 1985-<br />

1987, and based on verified reports from<br />

local residents, (Z. Bruneniece, unpublished<br />

Bachelor's <strong>the</strong>sis), records <strong>of</strong><br />

Anguis fragilis, Natrix natrix, and Vipera<br />

berus were present in a proportion<br />

1:0.9:0.6, compared to a proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

0.6:1:0.05 in <strong>the</strong> present survey (1999-<br />

2000) based on transect routes. As <strong>the</strong><br />

total number <strong>of</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three<br />

species was considerably higher in <strong>the</strong><br />

former survey, a decrease <strong>of</strong> all three<br />

species is possible. Populations <strong>of</strong> Anguis<br />

fragilis, Natrix natrix, and Vipera berus<br />

show long-term declining trends in<br />

Finland (Terhivuo 1993), and decline <strong>of</strong><br />

Vipera berus is recorded for North<br />

European Russia (Orlov & Ananjeva<br />

1995). Long-term declining trends for<br />

<strong>the</strong>se species in Latvia is also possible.<br />

Lacerta vivipara inhabits diverse habitats<br />

in both forest and open landscapes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Park. For this species, a change <strong>of</strong> dominant<br />

tree species depending on humidity<br />

and canopy closure in <strong>the</strong> habitat was<br />

observed. There was a correlation<br />

between <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> Lacerta vivipara<br />

and that <strong>of</strong> pine in wet and closed<br />

habitats, and that <strong>of</strong> deciduous trees in<br />

dry open habitats. The latter possibly<br />

reflects <strong>the</strong> dominance <strong>of</strong> deciduous trees<br />

in open landscapes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park, and not<br />

that deciduous trees were preferred by<br />

Lacerta vivipara. However, <strong>the</strong>se shifts<br />

can reflect <strong>the</strong> microclimatic preferences<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species. Pine stands are usually well<br />

lit, and in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> wet stands (such as<br />

in high moor or forest on wet peat), fairly<br />

open. Deciduous tree stands in wet<br />

sites are usually shaded and may be too<br />

cool for Lacerta vivipara. In <strong>the</strong> open<br />

landscapes, summer temperatures can be<br />

considerably higher than in <strong>the</strong> forest<br />

sites. Sparse, dry and relatively open pine<br />

stands may be too dry and hot for Lacerta<br />

vivipara, and suitable ra<strong>the</strong>r to Lacerta<br />

agilis which inhabits such sites on <strong>the</strong>


24 Biota 3/1-2,2002 CEIRANS<br />

n high moors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Moscow region <strong>of</strong><br />

Russia, <strong>the</strong> most favourable habitat for<br />

Lacerta vivipara was observed to be wet<br />

sites with sparse low pine stands and<br />

Myrica gale, Ledum palustre,<br />

Eriophorum vaginatum, and Sphagnum<br />

in <strong>the</strong> herb and moss layer<br />

(Zamolodchikov & Avilova 1989). In<br />

high moors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park,<br />

Lacerta vivipara preferred sites with a<br />

stable water regime, such as sparse low<br />

pine-birch stands near old harvested<br />

peat areas or in partially drained moor<br />

areas, with characteristic swards <strong>of</strong><br />

Calluna vulgaris and grasses (Molinia<br />

caerulea etc.) in <strong>the</strong> herb layer.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> survey, large numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

killed amphibians on roads were<br />

observed in relatively few cases, mostly<br />

regarding Bufo bufo. There are data<br />

from <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Park, near<br />

Ligatne (I.Valikova, unpublished<br />

Bachelors <strong>the</strong>sis), where amphibians<br />

killed on roads were counted during <strong>the</strong><br />

spawning period (April - first 10 days <strong>of</strong><br />

May) for two seasons (1999-2000). The<br />

maximum numbers <strong>of</strong> kills were 212<br />

Rana temporaria, 35 Bufo bufo, and 14<br />

Rana an/alls in one spring per 1 km <strong>of</strong><br />

road. In one case, about 15 km outside<br />

<strong>the</strong> border <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park,<br />

382 killed Rana temporaria and 70 Bufo<br />

bufo per km were counted. This indicates<br />

that <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> killed brown<br />

frogs recorded in <strong>the</strong> Park in <strong>the</strong> present<br />

survey - maximum 11 frogs/km - is an<br />

REFERENCES<br />

underestimate, probably due to <strong>the</strong> timing<br />

<strong>of</strong> field work after <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

amphibian spawning season.<br />

The following conservation and research<br />

activities are recommended for <strong>the</strong> Gauja<br />

National Park:<br />

- Creating a data base <strong>of</strong> records at least<br />

for rare species (Lacerta agilis, Anguis<br />

fragilis, Natrix natrix, Vipera berus,<br />

Triturus vulgaris, T. cristatus, Rana<br />

an/alls) using <strong>the</strong> 1999-2000 inventory<br />

project as a base;<br />

- More research on ecology <strong>of</strong> all species<br />

is needed to encourage <strong>the</strong> development<br />

<strong>of</strong> a management plan for reptiles and<br />

amphibians in <strong>the</strong> Gauja National Park;<br />

- Development <strong>of</strong> a network <strong>of</strong> protected<br />

microreserves for Triturus cristatus.<br />

The species is included in Appendices II<br />

<strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> Bern Convention<br />

(Anonymous 1992a) and ED Directive<br />

92/43EEC (Anonymous 1992b), and in<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2nd category (vulnerable species) <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Red Data Book <strong>of</strong> Latvia (Ingelog et.<br />

al. 1993);<br />

- Measures should be made to avoid<br />

"•amphibian road kills. In cases <strong>of</strong> mass<br />

road kills, conservation activities such as<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> roadside fences and<br />

underground passages should be<br />

planned;<br />

- Increasing public awareness <strong>of</strong> reptile<br />

and amphibian conservation in <strong>the</strong> Park.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r tourism development could have<br />

a negative effect on some species, particularly<br />

snakes.<br />

ANONYMOUS 1992a: Appendix II, Strictly Protected Fauna Species to <strong>the</strong> Convention on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Conservation <strong>of</strong> European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Bern, 1979.<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Environment and Local Authorities, Strasbourg.<br />

ANONYMOUS 1992b: EU Directive 92/43/EEC on <strong>the</strong> Conservation <strong>of</strong> Natural Habitats and<br />

Wild Fauna and Flora, Brussels.<br />

BUSS, K. 1997: Forest ecosystem classification in Latvia. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Latvian Academy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sciences. Section B 51: 204-218.<br />

CEIRANS, A. in press: Reptiles and anurans <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kemeri National Park, Latvia. In: Heikkila,


CEIRANS Biota 3/i-a, 2002 25<br />

R. & Lindholm, T. (eds.). Biodiversity and conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boreal nature.<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10 years anniversary symposium <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nature Reserve<br />

Friendship. The Finnish Environment 485.<br />

INGELOG, T., ANDERSSON, R. & TJERNBERG, M. (eds.) 1993: Red Data Book <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic<br />

Region. Part 1. Lists <strong>of</strong> Threatened Vascular Plants and Vertebrates. Swedish<br />

Threatened Species Unit, Uppsala.<br />

KABUCIS, I. (ed.) 2000: Biotopu rokasgramata. Eiropas Savienibas aizsargajamie biotopi<br />

Latvija [Hand<strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> habitats. Protected habitats by European Union in Latvia].<br />

Latvijas dabas fonds, Riga (in Latvian).<br />

ORLOV, N.L. & ANANJEVA, N.B. 1995: Distribution <strong>of</strong> amphibians and reptiles and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

relict populations in <strong>the</strong> Gulf <strong>of</strong> Finland and Lake Ladoga. Memoranda Societatis<br />

pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 71: 109-112.<br />

PILATS, V. 2000: Emeralds <strong>of</strong> Latvia. Opportunities for nature tourism. Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Environmental Protection and Regional Development, Riga.<br />

PRIEDITIS, N. 1999: Latvian forest: nature and diversity. WWF, Riga.<br />

SILINS, J. & LAMSTERS, V. 1934: Latvijas rapuli un abinieki [Reptiles and amphibians <strong>of</strong><br />

Latvia]. Valters un Rapa, Riga (in Latvian).<br />

TERHIVUO, J. 1993: Provisional atlas and status <strong>of</strong> populations for <strong>the</strong> herpet<strong>of</strong>auna <strong>of</strong><br />

Finland in 1980-92. Annales Zoologici Fennici 30: 55-69.<br />

ZAMOLODCHIKOV, D.G. & AVILOVA, K.V. 1989: Materials on biology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Common<br />

Lizard, Lacerta vivipara, in a high moor in Western Moscow region. In:<br />

Amphibians and reptiles <strong>of</strong> Moscow Region. Nauka, Moscow: 147-152 (in<br />

Russian).


GENTILLI, SCALI, BARBIERI & BERNINI Biota 3/i-a, 2002 27<br />

A three-year project for <strong>the</strong><br />

management and <strong>the</strong> conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> amphibians in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy<br />

Augusto GENTILLI1, Stefano SCALI2r<br />

Francesco BARBIERI1 & Franco BERNINI1<br />

1 Dip. Biologia Animale, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, p.za Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy<br />

2 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, c.so Venezia 55, 20121 Milano-ltaly<br />

Abstract<br />

In 1998 <strong>the</strong> Lombardy District (Regione Lombardia, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy), in co-operation<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Italian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment, started an integrated three-year project for<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> amphibians in twelve regional parks, in both mountain and plain areas.<br />

The aims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project were translocation <strong>of</strong> some threatened amphibian species and<br />

habitat management <strong>of</strong> some endangered environments. The target species were<br />

Salamandra salamandra, Triturus camifex, Pelobates fuscus insubricus, Bombina variegata,<br />

Hyla intermedia, Rana latastei, R. dalmatina and R. temporaria. The target habitats<br />

are natural and artificial ponds and springs located in areas where <strong>the</strong>se environments<br />

are disappearing.<br />

The translocations involved P. fuscus insubricus and R. latastei; eggs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species<br />

were collected in areas in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy in accordance with taxonomic and conservation<br />

interests. Eggs and tadpoles were bred in semi-natural conditions by <strong>the</strong> biologists<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Pavia. Tadpoles were released immediately before metamorphosis.<br />

One half <strong>of</strong> bred tadpoles were released in <strong>the</strong> areas where <strong>the</strong> eggs were collected.<br />

The new and restored ponds in most cases have been spontaneously colonized by seven<br />

amphibian species: Salamandra salamandra, Bufo bufo, Hyla intermedia, Rana dalmatina,<br />

R. latastei, R. temporaria and R. synklepton esculenta. The successful metamorphosis<br />

and survival after <strong>the</strong> wintering period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> translocated specimens were also<br />

observed. These preliminary results underline <strong>the</strong> importance and <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> translocation and habitat management for amphibian conservation projects.<br />

Key words: Amphibians, conservation, translocation, habitat management, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Italy<br />

Received 24 September; accepted 12 December 2001


28 Biota 3/1-2,2002 GENTILLI, SCALI, BARBIERI & BERNINI<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> habitat management and<br />

translocations for amphibian conservation<br />

has been proposed by many authors<br />

(Fog 1988, Burke 1991, Dodd & Seigel<br />

1991, Reinert 1991, Bray 1994, Langton<br />

et al. 1994, Amtkjaer 1995, Andren &<br />

Nilson 1995a, b, Cooke & Oldham 1995,<br />

Gubbels 1995, Hels & Fog 1995, Juul<br />

1995, Zvirgzds et al. 1995, Griffiths,<br />

1996, Agger 1997, Briggs 1997, Fog<br />

1997, Jensen 1997, Lacoste & Durrer<br />

1998). A three year project based on<br />

<strong>the</strong>se methods was started in 1998 to<br />

preserve amphibian species and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

habitats in Lombardy (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy).<br />

The project was made possible thanks to<br />

<strong>the</strong> appropriation <strong>of</strong> € 250.000 by <strong>the</strong><br />

Regione Lombardia and <strong>the</strong> Italian<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Environment. The<br />

authors describe <strong>the</strong> methods used during<br />

<strong>the</strong> project and its preliminary results.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The project involved 12 natural parks,<br />

seven <strong>of</strong> which are located in <strong>the</strong> Po<br />

Plain (Table 1) and five in <strong>the</strong> Alps (Table<br />

2). The present or historical presence <strong>of</strong><br />

amphibian species in <strong>the</strong> parks was<br />

assessed by bibliographic and personal<br />

data (Andreone et al. 1993, Societas<br />

Herpetologica Italica 1996, Bonini et al.<br />

2000).<br />

Using <strong>the</strong>se data, we identified target<br />

species based on two main criteria:<br />

endemic or rare taxa considered important<br />

by European laws (Habitats<br />

Directive 92/43/European Community:<br />

T. carnifex, P. fuscus insubricus, B. variegata,<br />

H. intermedia, R. dalmatina, R.<br />

latastei) and species that, although not<br />

rare in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy, are in decline in<br />

some areas (i.e., S. salamandra, H. intermedia,<br />

R. dalmatina and R. temporaria).<br />

The literature on <strong>the</strong>se species was<br />

examined to ga<strong>the</strong>r data on <strong>the</strong>ir ecological<br />

needs. Only Pelobates fuscus insubricus<br />

and Rana latastei were chosen for<br />

translocations, because <strong>the</strong>y are quite<br />

rare in many areas <strong>of</strong> Lombardy and <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are endemic to <strong>the</strong> Po Plain.<br />

Forty suitable areas for habitat management<br />

and translocations were identified<br />

following many field surveys with park<br />

staff. The causes <strong>of</strong> amphibian decline in<br />

<strong>the</strong>se sites were analysed and some<br />

Actions for habitat restoration were proposed,<br />

in accordance with <strong>the</strong> guidelines<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> I.U.C.N., <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Wildlife<br />

Institute (I.N.F.S.), and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Societas<br />

Table 1. Target species and conservation measures chosen for lowland parks; HM<br />

Habitat Management, Rl = Reproduction, PR = Population reinforcement.<br />

Park<br />

Parco Pineta di Appiano<br />

Gentile e Tradate<br />

Parco Ticino<br />

Parco Agricolo Sud<br />

Parco Adda Sud<br />

Parco Serio<br />

Parco Oglio Sud<br />

Parco Mincio<br />

PLAIN PARKS<br />

Target species<br />

Salamandra salamandra<br />

Triturus carnifex<br />

Rana dalmatina<br />

Pelobates fuscus<br />

Pelobates fuscus<br />

Rana latastei<br />

Pelobates fuscus<br />

Rana latastei<br />

Rana latastei<br />

Rana latastei<br />

Rana latastei<br />

HM<br />

Conservation<br />

measures<br />

HM,RI<br />

HM,RI<br />

HM,RI<br />

HM,RI<br />

HM,PR<br />

HM,RI<br />

HM<br />

HM


GENTILLI, SCALI, BARBIERI & BERNINI Biota 3/1-2,2002 29<br />

Table 2. Target species and conservation measures chosen for alpine parks; HM =<br />

Habitat Management, Rl = Reintroduction, PR = Population reinforcement.<br />

Park<br />

Parco Monte Barro<br />

Parco Orobie Valtel lines!<br />

Parco Colli di Bergamo<br />

Parco Adamello<br />

Parco Alto Garda Bresciano<br />

Herpetologica Italica (I.N.F.S. 1995,<br />

Stanley Price & Fairclough 1997, Societas<br />

Herpetologica Italica 1997). In particular,<br />

we chose public areas that guaranteed<br />

major protection status over private<br />

ones; <strong>the</strong> sites where habitat restoration<br />

was not possible were discarded. The<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> sites was also based on ecological,<br />

habitat structural and human factors<br />

(Scali et al. 2002). In addition, <strong>the</strong> chosen<br />

sites were contiguous with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

suitable damp areas, in order to re-create<br />

metapopulations.<br />

Many techniques were used for habitat<br />

restoration:<br />

• creation <strong>of</strong> new ponds: some pools<br />

were excavated in suitable areas to<br />

increase reproductive sites;<br />

• restoration <strong>of</strong> old ponds: some desiccated<br />

or almost desiccated existing<br />

ponds were excavated to increase water<br />

levels during <strong>the</strong> breeding period;<br />

• waterpro<strong>of</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> ponds: new and old<br />

ponds were waterpro<strong>of</strong>ed with clay or<br />

PVC, if necessary, to guarantee water<br />

permanence;<br />

• increase <strong>of</strong> laying points: some deadwood<br />

was introduced to facilitate egg<br />

anchorage;<br />

• excavation <strong>of</strong> tributary canals: when<br />

necessary, <strong>the</strong>y were dug to allow water<br />

permanence;<br />

• positioning <strong>of</strong> metallic grids: <strong>the</strong>se were<br />

used to stop predator fish entrance;<br />

• removal <strong>of</strong> fish: <strong>the</strong>se vertebrates were<br />

removed, if already present, using an<br />

ALPINE PARKS<br />

Target species<br />

Salamandra salamandra<br />

Rana temporaria<br />

Bombina variegata<br />

Rana temporaria<br />

Salamandra salamandra<br />

Hyla intermedia<br />

Rana temporaria<br />

Conservation measures<br />

HM<br />

HM<br />

HM<br />

HM,PR<br />

HM<br />

electrostunner, and <strong>the</strong>y were released in<br />

contiguous damp areas.<br />

Translocations were carried on only after<br />

habitat management and only if we considered<br />

reintroductions or population<br />

reinforcements necessary: i) when a population<br />

was extinct and re-colonization<br />

was impossible or unlikely, ii) when a<br />

population had strongly declined and its<br />

<strong>full</strong> recovery was unlikely or it required a<br />

very long time.<br />

The eggs <strong>of</strong> Pelobates fuscus insubricus<br />

and Rana latastei were collected in sites<br />

where <strong>the</strong>se species are quite abundant<br />

and located near <strong>the</strong> translocation areas,<br />

to guarantee genetic homogeneity. In<br />

fact, no geographic barriers are present<br />

in areas involved in <strong>the</strong> plan, and <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are no borders to <strong>the</strong> biogeographic<br />

regions. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, no information<br />

about <strong>the</strong> genetics <strong>of</strong> Rana latastei and<br />

Pelobates fuscus insubricus are available<br />

for <strong>the</strong>se areas, and no funds were<br />

appropriated for this kind <strong>of</strong> research.<br />

Eggs were transported to Bosco Negri<br />

Natural Reserve, which is managed by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Italian League for Bird Protection<br />

(LIPU), and <strong>the</strong>y were hatched in seminatural<br />

conditions by <strong>the</strong> authors. Eggs<br />

coming from different clumps were<br />

mixed to increase genetic diversity.<br />

Tadpoles were released only when <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

hind legs were developing; one half <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m were released in <strong>the</strong> donor sites,<br />

because we do not want to impoverish<br />

those populations.


30 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 GENTILLI, SCALI, BARBIERI & BERNINI<br />

RESULTS<br />

To date, 56 habitat management projects<br />

have been carried out in 34 different<br />

sites. During <strong>the</strong> year 2000 a total <strong>of</strong><br />

2000 tadpoles <strong>of</strong> P. fuscus and 12,000 <strong>of</strong><br />

R. latastei were bred; in 2001, <strong>the</strong> number<br />

<strong>of</strong> R. latastei increased to 28,000. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> same year P. fuscus did not breed,<br />

due to unfavourable climatic conditions.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> former year we made six reintroductions<br />

<strong>of</strong> P. fuscus insubricus, and two<br />

reintroductions and three population<br />

reinforcements <strong>of</strong> R. latastei. During <strong>the</strong><br />

second year we made seven reintroductions<br />

and six population reinforcements<br />

<strong>of</strong> R. latastei.<br />

Metamorphosis occurred without any<br />

particular problem in both years and<br />

some juveniles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spadefoot toad<br />

were found in spring 2001. The habitat<br />

management works led to an improvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental conditions for<br />

amphibians in general. In fact, <strong>the</strong> populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> different species already living<br />

in those areas <strong>of</strong>ten colonized <strong>the</strong> new<br />

ponds and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> egg clumps<br />

increased in <strong>the</strong> second year (Table 3 and<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Preliminary data suggest that <strong>the</strong> project<br />

is quite successful. This result is apparent<br />

from <strong>the</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> breeding specimens<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species already existing in managed<br />

areas and by <strong>the</strong> successful metamorphosis<br />

<strong>of</strong> many tadpoles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

translocated species. No information is<br />

available at <strong>the</strong> present time about<br />

future reproductive success <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> managed<br />

populations. To achieve <strong>the</strong>se data,<br />

a monitoring phase is required in future<br />

years. The breeding operations, <strong>the</strong><br />

translocations, and <strong>the</strong> habitat management<br />

works will continue through 2002<br />

to improve <strong>the</strong> preliminary results.<br />

This kind <strong>of</strong> project guarantees a fast and<br />

easy way to reconstitute wild populations;<br />

in fact, amphibians can be bred at<br />

a low cost and a large number <strong>of</strong> future<br />

breeders can be achieved in a short time;<br />

moreover, <strong>the</strong> breeding and <strong>the</strong> release<br />

do not involve behavioural problems, as<br />

is <strong>of</strong>ten reported for birds and mammals<br />

(Bloxam & Tonge 1995).<br />

It is important to underline that many <strong>of</strong><br />

The increased species are protected by<br />

European laws (Habitat Directive). Our<br />

observations highlight <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />

a co-ordinate project for an homogeneous<br />

line <strong>of</strong> conduct and for an optimization<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic resources.


GENTILLI, SCAU, BARBIERI & BERNINI Biota 3/i-a, 2002 31<br />

Table 3. Increase <strong>of</strong> already present species and colonization by new species in <strong>the</strong> lowland<br />

parks.<br />

Plain parks<br />

Parco Pineta di Appiano Gentile<br />

e Tradate<br />

Parco Ticino<br />

Parco Agricolo Sud<br />

Parco Adda Sud<br />

Parco Serio<br />

Parco Oglio Sud<br />

Parco Mincio<br />

Increase<br />

T. vulgaris<br />

T. camifex<br />

R dalmatina<br />

R. synklepton esculenta<br />

R. latastei<br />

R. latastei<br />

Colonization<br />

S. salamandra<br />

T. carnifex<br />

R. dalmatina<br />

T. vulgaris<br />

B. bufo<br />

H. intermedia<br />

R. latastei<br />

R. dalmatina<br />

R. synklepton esculenta<br />

H. intermedia<br />

R. synklepton esculenta<br />

H. intermedia<br />

R. synklepton esculenta<br />

R. synklepton esculenta<br />

R. synklepton esculenta<br />

R. synklepton esculenta<br />

Table 4. Increase <strong>of</strong> already present species and colonization by new species in <strong>the</strong><br />

alpine parks.<br />

Plain parks Increase Colonization<br />

Parco Monte Barro<br />

Parco Orobie Valtellinesi<br />

Parco Colli di Bergamo<br />

Parco Adamello<br />

Parco Alto Garda Bresciano<br />

"*& salamandra<br />

R. temporaria<br />

S. salamandra<br />

B. variegata<br />

R. temporaria<br />

S. salamandra R, temporaria<br />

REFERENCES<br />

AGGER, P. 1997: The background for <strong>the</strong> habitat management, monitoring and nature<br />

restoration in Denmark. Memoranda pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica 73: 87-<br />

90.<br />

AMTKJAER, J. 1995: Increasing populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Green Toad (Bufo viridis) due to a pond<br />

project on <strong>the</strong> island <strong>of</strong> Samso. Memoranda pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica<br />

71:77-81.<br />

ANDREN, C. & NILSON, G. 1995a: Re-introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fire-bellied Toad Bombina<br />

bombina in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Sweden. Memoranda pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica<br />

71:82-83.<br />

ANDREN, C. & NILSON, G. 1995b: Translocation <strong>of</strong> amphibians and reptiles. Memoranda<br />

pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica 71: 84-87.<br />

ANDREONE, F., FORTINA, R. & CHIMINELLO, A. 1993: Natural history, ecology and conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Italian Spadefoot toad, Pelobates fuscus insubricus. [Storia nat-


32 )ta 3/1-2, 2OO2 GENTILLI, SCALI, BARBIERI & BERNINI<br />

urale, ecologia e conservazione del Pelobate Insubrico, Pelobates fuscus insubricus].<br />

Scientific reports, Zoological Society "La Torbiera", Agrate Conturbia<br />

(NO), 2: 1-92.<br />

BLOXAM, Q.M.C. & TONGE, S.J. 1995: Amphibians: suitable candidates for breedingrelease<br />

programmes. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 636-644.<br />

BONINI, L, GENTILLI, A., RAZZETTI, E. & SCALI, S. 2000: Progetto atlante erpetologico<br />

lombardo: cartine definitive (27 maggio 2000). Societas Herpetologica Italica<br />

Sezione Lombardia, Centra Stampa dell'Universita di Pavia: 1-24.<br />

BRAY, R. 1994: Case study: A programme <strong>of</strong> habitat creation and great crested newt introduction<br />

to restored opencast land for British Coast Opencast. In: Gent, T. & Bray,<br />

R. (eds.). Conservation and management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great crested newts Triturus<br />

cristatus, 11 January 1994 Kew Gardens, Richmond, Surrey. English Nature,<br />

Surrey: 113-126.<br />

BRIGGS, L. 1997: Recovery <strong>of</strong> Bombina bombina in Funen County, Denmark. Memoranda<br />

pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica 73: 101-104.<br />

BURKE, R.L. 1991: Relocations, repatriations, and translocations <strong>of</strong> amphibians and rep tiles:<br />

taking a broader view. Herpetologica 47: 350-357.<br />

COOKE, A.S. & OLDHAM, R.S. 1995: Establishment <strong>of</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> common frog,<br />

Rana tetnporaria and common toad, Bufo bufo, in a newly created reserve following<br />

translocation. Herpetological Journal 5: 173-180.<br />

DODD, C.K. Jr. & SEIGEL, R.A. 1991: Relocation, repatriation, and translocation <strong>of</strong> amphibians<br />

and reptiles: are <strong>the</strong>y conservation strategies that work? Herpetologica 47:<br />

336-350.<br />

FOG, K. 1988: Pond restoration on Bornholm. Memoranda pro Societatis Fauna Flora<br />

Fennica 64: 143-145.<br />

FOG, K. 1997: A survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> pond projects for rare amphibians in Denmark.<br />

Memoranda pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica 73: 91-100.<br />

GRIFFITHS, R.A. 1996: Newts and Salamanders"<strong>of</strong> Europe. Poyser Ltd., London: 1-188.<br />

GUBBELS, R. 1995: The restoration <strong>of</strong> habitats for Amphibians by <strong>the</strong> Roer and Overmaas<br />

Waterboard with special attention for <strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most important<br />

breeding biotope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tree frog (Hyla arborea L.) in <strong>the</strong> Dutch province <strong>of</strong><br />

Limburg. In: Llorente; A., Santos, X. & Carretero, M.A. (eds.). Scientia<br />

Herpetologica, Asociacion Herpetologica Espanola, Barcelona: 361 - 364.<br />

HELS, T. & FOG, K. 1995: Does it help to restore ponds? A case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tree Frog (Hyla<br />

arborea). Memoranda pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica 71: 93-95.<br />

I.N.F.S. 1995: Documento sulle immissioni faunistiche. Linee guida per le introduzioni, reintroduzioni<br />

e ripopolamenti di Uccelli e Mammiferi. Ill Convegno Nazionale Biologi<br />

della Selvaggina, Bologna 9-11 Febbraio 1995.<br />

JENSEN, B.H. 1997: Relocation <strong>of</strong> a garlic toad (Pelobates fuscus) population. Memoranda<br />

pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica 73: 111-113.<br />

JUUL, K. 1995: New ponds in Aarhus (Denmark). Memoranda pro Societatis Fauna et Flora<br />

Fennica 71: 146-148.<br />

LACOSTE, V. & DURRER, H. 1998: Past distribution and current status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> common<br />

spadefoot (Pelobates fuscus) in <strong>the</strong> Plain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Upper Rhine and strategies <strong>of</strong><br />

reintroduction. In: Miaud, C. & Guyetant, R. (eds.). Current studies in her- petology,<br />

<strong>SEH</strong>, Le Bourget du Lac, France: 239-247.<br />

LANGTON, T.E.S., BECKETT, K., MORGAN, K. & DRYDEN, R.C. 1994: Translocation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

crested newt Triturus cristatus population from a site in Crewe, Cheshire, to a<br />

nearby receptor site. In: Gent, T. & Bray, R. (eds.). Conservation and man agement<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great crested newts Triturus cristatus, 11 January 1994 Kew Gardens,


GENTILLI, SCALI, BARBIERI & BERNINI BJOta 3/1-2,2002 33<br />

Richmond, Surrey. English Nature, Richmond: 92-103.<br />

REINERT, H.K. 1991: Translocation as a conservation strategy for Amphibians and Reptiles:<br />

some comments, concerns, and observations. Herpetologica 47: 357-363.<br />

SCALI, S., GENTILLI, A., BARBIERI, R, BERNINI, F. & VERCESI, A. 2002: An integrated project<br />

for conservation <strong>of</strong> amphibians in some protected areas in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy. Atti<br />

3° Convegno "Salvaguardia Anfibi", Lugano 23-24 Giugno 2000,<br />

Cugecstre Edizioni, Penne: 151-158<br />

Societas Herpetologica Italica 1996: Atlante prowisorio degli Anfibi e dei Rettili italiani.<br />

Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale "Giacomo Doria", Geneva 91: 95-<br />

178.<br />

Societas Herpetologica Italica 1997: Linee guida per le reintroduzioni, i ripopo lament! e le<br />

introduzioni di Anfibi e Rettili. In: Commissione Conservazione S.H.I.,<br />

Herp.Lex.98: 6-11.<br />

STANLEY PRICE, M.R. & FAIRCLOUGH, A. 1997: Translocation <strong>of</strong> wildlife: <strong>the</strong> ILJCN position<br />

statement and general considerations on behavioural constraints to release.<br />

Supplement! Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina 27: 25-38.<br />

ZVIRGZDS, J., STASULS, A/I. & VILNITIS, V. 1995: Reproduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Tree Frog<br />

(Hyla arborea) in Latvia. Memoranda pro Societatis Fauna et Flora Fennica 71:<br />

139-142.


COILMANN, COLLMANN, BAUMGARTNER & WARINGER BJQta 3/1-2, 2002 35<br />

Spawning site shifts by Rana<br />

dalmatina and Rana temporaria in<br />

response to habitat change<br />

Gunter GOLLMANN1, Birgit GOLLMANN1,<br />

Christian BAUMGARTNER2 & Andrea<br />

WARINGER-LOSCHENKOHL2<br />

'Institut fur Zoologie, Universitat Wien, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Wien, Austria<br />

E-mail: guenter.gollmann@univie.ac.at<br />

2lnstitut fur Okologie und Naturschutz, Universitat Wien, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Wien,<br />

Austria<br />

Abstract<br />

Between 1995 and 2001 we investigated spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> spawn deposition by Rana<br />

dalmatina and R. temporaria in <strong>the</strong> flood retention basin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mauerbach stream in<br />

western Vienna (Austria). This basin was constructed in <strong>the</strong> late 19th century; until<br />

1996 it was bypassed by <strong>the</strong> stream flowing in a straight channel and contained several<br />

temporary pools. In <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> reconstruction works <strong>the</strong> basin was flooded for prolonged<br />

periods in 1997 and 1998 and a meadow close to <strong>the</strong> stream, outside <strong>the</strong> retention<br />

basin, was inundated. Since 1998 <strong>the</strong> stream has been running partly through <strong>the</strong><br />

basin, connecting all <strong>the</strong> pools that existed previously. Owing to <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water<br />

table, a few new shallow pools formed in <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin. Since 2000,<br />

beaver dams have stabilized <strong>the</strong> water level in <strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin. Clutches <strong>of</strong><br />

R. dalmatina were usually laid separately, attached to vegetation such as stalks <strong>of</strong> reed,<br />

whereas egg masses <strong>of</strong> R. temporaria were <strong>of</strong>ten aggregated in clusters. Both species<br />

readily adopted new water bodies and ceased to use some areas frequented in <strong>the</strong> early<br />

years <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study. A shift to shallower spawning sites, which was more distinct in R.<br />

temporaria than in R. dalmatina, may be interpreted as predator avoidance or a preference<br />

for warm microhabitats under generally colder conditions.<br />

Key words: amphibians, ecology, oviposition, stream restoration, Ranidae<br />

Received 10 November; accepted 15 December 2001


36 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 GOLLMANN, GOLLMANN, BAUMGARTNER & WARINGER<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Spawn is an important stage in <strong>the</strong> lifehistory<br />

<strong>of</strong> most amphibians. Selection <strong>of</strong><br />

oviposition sites by spawning frogs has<br />

consequences for <strong>the</strong> risks <strong>of</strong> desiccation<br />

and predation on embryos and larvae as<br />

well as for growth opportunities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

tadpoles.<br />

Two species <strong>of</strong> brown frogs, Rana dalmatina<br />

and Rana temporaria, have widely<br />

overlapping distributions in Europe<br />

(Gasc et al. 1997), but syntopic occurrence<br />

is rare in many regions. Their lifehistories<br />

are similar; in Central Europe<br />

both species breed in early spring. The<br />

question whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir distributions are<br />

influenced by interspecific competition<br />

has remained unresolved (e.g. Riis 1988,<br />

Rohrbach & Kuhn 1997). Competition<br />

among amphibians is expected to occur<br />

mainly during <strong>the</strong> larval stage (Wilbur<br />

1996). Hence, spatial and temporal patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> spawn deposition determine <strong>the</strong><br />

potential for competition among tadpoles,<br />

and may also influence <strong>the</strong> outcome<br />

<strong>of</strong> this competition.<br />

To assess possibilities for competition<br />

and conditions <strong>of</strong> co-occurrence, we<br />

have investigated oviposition, embryonic<br />

and larval development in syntopic populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> R. dalmatina and R. temporaria<br />

at <strong>the</strong> western outskirts <strong>of</strong> Vienna<br />

Figure 1. Water bodies in <strong>the</strong> study area 1995-1997. Outlines show maximal size <strong>of</strong><br />

temporary pools that mostly dried during summer.


GOLLMANN, GOLLMANN, BAUMGARTNER & WARINGER Biota 3/1-2, 2002 37<br />

since 1995 (Baumgartner et al. 1996,<br />

Gollmann et al. 1999). Reconstruction<br />

works affecting <strong>the</strong> study area, including<br />

a stream restoration project, caused pr<strong>of</strong>ound<br />

habitat change. Here, we describe<br />

<strong>the</strong> spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> spawn deposition<br />

over seven study years.<br />

STUDY AREA AND HABITAT CHANGE<br />

Observations were made in <strong>the</strong> flood<br />

retention basin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mauerbach stream.<br />

This basin was constructed in <strong>the</strong> late<br />

19th century to retard water during flood<br />

peaks. It measures approximately 350 x<br />

70 m and until 1997 was bypassed by <strong>the</strong><br />

stream flowing in a straight channel.<br />

Rgure 2. Water bodies in <strong>the</strong> study area since 1998.<br />

Pool dry in 2001<br />

Beaver dam<br />

Temporary pools in <strong>the</strong> central and lower<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin usually dried in late<br />

spring or early summer (Figure 1). In<br />

1995, water from <strong>the</strong> stream never<br />

flowed into <strong>the</strong> basin. On 8 April 1996<br />

melting <strong>of</strong> snow in upstream areas caused<br />

a brief flooding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin, which led to<br />

<strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> a new ephemeral pool at<br />

<strong>the</strong> upper end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin.<br />

In autumn 1996 reconstruction works<br />

started, with <strong>the</strong> aims <strong>of</strong> improving flood<br />

protection (<strong>of</strong> downstream districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Vienna) and redirecting part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

stream through <strong>the</strong> retention basin. In<br />

spring <strong>of</strong> 1997, <strong>the</strong> basin was flooded by<br />

<strong>the</strong> stream for prolonged periods, and a


38 Biota 3/1-2, 2002 GOLLWIANN, GOLLMANN, BAUAAGARTNER & WARINGER<br />

meadow close to <strong>the</strong> stream, directly<br />

above <strong>the</strong> retention basin, was inundated<br />

(Figure 1). Heavy rainfalls in July<br />

1997 caused deep submersion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

retention basin, which lasted until<br />

February 1998, when debris from <strong>the</strong><br />

outlet was removed. Since <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong><br />

stream has been running partly through<br />

<strong>the</strong> basin, connecting all ponds that had<br />

existed previously. Owing to <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> water table, a few new shallow<br />

ponds formed in <strong>the</strong> upper parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

basin. Since winter 1999/2000, beavers<br />

have inhabited <strong>the</strong> basin; <strong>the</strong>y have<br />

gradually been building dams, which<br />

have increased and stabilized <strong>the</strong> water<br />

level in <strong>the</strong> retention basin (Figure 2).<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

During <strong>the</strong> brown frog breeding season<br />

<strong>the</strong> study area was usually visited daily,<br />

rarely at two day intervals. Minimummaximum<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmometers and watergauges<br />

were placed at several sites in <strong>the</strong><br />

study area.<br />

Each egg mass was individually marked<br />

Figure 3. Partition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study area<br />

into four sections (see text and<br />

Figure 4).<br />

with a floating disk <strong>of</strong> cork tied to <strong>the</strong><br />

jelly with a string (1995-1999) or with a<br />

straw pushed through <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

spawn clump (2000-2001). Position <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> clutch, water depth at <strong>the</strong> spawning<br />

site and depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water column<br />

above <strong>the</strong> spawn clump were recorded;<br />

one egg was removed for species determination<br />

by enzyme electrophoresis<br />

(Baumgartner et al. 1996), which was<br />

performed for most clutches.<br />

RESULTS<br />

To summarize spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> spawn<br />

deposition, <strong>the</strong> study area is here divided<br />

into four sections (Figures 3, 4): partitions<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin correspond to slight<br />

rises in <strong>the</strong> ground, whereas pools outside<br />

<strong>the</strong> basin are summarized as area D.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first study year, only pools in <strong>the</strong><br />

lower and central parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin (A,<br />

B) were available as breeding habitats.<br />

Newly created water bodies, such as <strong>the</strong><br />

meadow inundated in 1997 (area D),<br />

were readily accepted for spawning by<br />

both species.<br />

Figure 4. Number <strong>of</strong> clutches <strong>of</strong> R. dalmatina<br />

and R. temporaria per year in <strong>the</strong> four parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> study area (see Figure 3).<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />

Rana dalmatina H Rana temporaria


GOLLMANN, GOLLMANN, BAUMGARTNER & WARINCER 3/1-2, 2002 39<br />

Figure 5. Water depth at <strong>the</strong> spawning sites: Lower symbols indicate depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water<br />

body at <strong>the</strong> spawning site (mean and standard deviation) for each species and year,<br />

upper symbols show mean values for depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water column above <strong>the</strong> spawn<br />

clump.<br />

A •*•»<br />

ffl 20-<br />

30~<br />

40 -1<br />

A Sana dalmatina<br />

4» Sana temporaria<br />

\s <strong>of</strong><br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1399 2000 2001<br />

always deposited singly, <strong>of</strong>ten attached<br />

to a central axis provided by a stalk <strong>of</strong><br />

reed or a branch. In <strong>the</strong> first four study<br />

years, <strong>the</strong> earliest clutches were deposited<br />

at <strong>the</strong> same site (<strong>the</strong> easternmost pool<br />

in area B, Figure 3). When <strong>the</strong> water<br />

level in <strong>the</strong> basin increased due to flooding<br />

(since 1997), some clutches were laid<br />

in deep water, whereas o<strong>the</strong>rs were<br />

deposited in shallow marginal areas,<br />

leading to enhanced variation in water<br />

depth at <strong>the</strong> spawning sites (Figure 5). In<br />

2001, most egg masses were laid close<br />

to <strong>the</strong> water surface.<br />

Spawn <strong>of</strong> R. temporaria was <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

aggregated in clusters, to which new egg<br />

masses were added over several days.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> pools in <strong>the</strong> basin were connected<br />

to running water, spawning <strong>of</strong><br />

this species became restricted to marginal<br />

areas; deep pools were no longer<br />

used, which resulted in an overall shift to<br />

lower mean values for water depth at<br />

<strong>the</strong> spawning site (Figure 5).<br />

In later years, both species ceased to<br />

spawn in water bodies which had<br />

become much deeper (areas A, B). Both<br />

species laid eggs in a bay <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stream<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> basin (area D) and in shallow<br />

muddy pools in <strong>the</strong> uppermost part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> basin, which were not connected to<br />

<strong>the</strong> stream (area C; <strong>the</strong>se pools were<br />

mostly dry in 2001).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The stream restoration project took some<br />

unexpected turns, such as a catastrophic<br />

flood in summer 1997 during <strong>the</strong> construction<br />

phase, and <strong>the</strong> immigration <strong>of</strong><br />

beavers. Overall, water bodies available<br />

as frog spawning sites in "<strong>the</strong> study area<br />

became much larger, more stable, and<br />

cooler. Numbers and diversity <strong>of</strong> preda-


40 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 GOLLMANN, GOLLMANN, BAUMGARTNER & WARINGER<br />

tors such as fish (including pike, Esox<br />

lucius), birds (mallards, rails, herons) and<br />

aquatic insects have increased greatly.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> habitat change on population<br />

dynamics are hard to predict. In <strong>the</strong><br />

short run, connection <strong>of</strong> spawning pools<br />

to <strong>the</strong> stream was certainly advantageous.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rwise, no tadpoles could<br />

have survived to metamorphosis in <strong>the</strong><br />

very dry years 2000 and 2001. For R.<br />

dalmatina, <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water<br />

bodies means loss <strong>of</strong> terrestrial habitat;<br />

hence, a reduction in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

breeding frogs in <strong>the</strong> study area can be<br />

expected. In <strong>the</strong> long run, decreased<br />

desiccation risk is counteracted by<br />

increased predation risk, but <strong>the</strong> outcome<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se opposing trends is uncertain,<br />

and may differ between species. In<br />

some riverine floodplains <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Germany, habitat management that<br />

increased flooded areas or <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

permanent pools led to growth <strong>of</strong> R.<br />

temporaria populations (Kuhn 2001,<br />

Laufer 2001, Utschick 2001).<br />

Shifting spawning sites to <strong>the</strong> shallow<br />

margins may have two reasons: predator<br />

avoidance or a preference for warm<br />

microhabitats under <strong>the</strong> generally cooler<br />

conditions. Predation on frog eggs<br />

seemed to be negligible in our study area<br />

(unpublished data). Laurila & Aho<br />

(1997) showed that R. temporaria did<br />

not avoid spawning in pools containing<br />

fish which prey on tadpoles. If predation<br />

risk did at all influence spawning site<br />

selection at our study site, adult frogs<br />

may have evaded deep water because <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> predatory fish such as<br />

pike.<br />

There was some opportunity for interspecific<br />

competition among brown frog<br />

tadpoles, especially in early study years<br />

with drying pools, but its importance for<br />

larval growth and survival was probably<br />

subordinate to abiotic factors (hydroperiod,<br />

water temperature, water velocity)<br />

and predation.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We thank <strong>the</strong> students <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vienna field course in amphibian ecology<br />

for <strong>the</strong>ir help in collecting and<br />

analysing data. GG acknowledges support<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Austrian Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Sciences, in <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>of</strong> ecological<br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> river restructuring commissioned<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Municipality <strong>of</strong> Vienna<br />

(Magistratsabteilung 45, Wasserbau).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BAUMGARTNER, C., BITSCHI, N., ELLINGER, N., GOLLMANN, B., GOLLMANN, G., KOCK,<br />

M., LEBETH, E. & WARINGER-LOSCHENKOHL, A. 1996: Laichablage und<br />

Embryonalentwicklung von Springfrosch (Rana dalmatina BONAPARTE, 1840)<br />

und Grasfrosch (Rana temporaria LINNAEUS, 1758) in einem syntopen<br />

Vorkommen (Anura: Ranidae). Herpetozoa9: 133-150.<br />

GASC, J.-P., CABELA, A., CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIC, J., DOLMEN, D., GROSSENBACHER, K.,<br />

HAFFNER, P., LESCURE, J., MARTENS, H., MARTINEZ RICA, J.P., MAURIN, H.,<br />

OLIVEIRA, M.E. , SOFIANIDOU, T. S. , VEITH, M. & ZUIDERWIJK, A. (eds.)<br />

1997: Atlas <strong>of</strong> Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Societas Europaea<br />

Herpetologica and Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (IEGP/SPN), Paris.<br />

GOLLMANN, G., BAUMGARTNER, C., GOLLMANN, B. & WARINGER-LOSCHENKOHL, A.<br />

1999: Breeding phenology <strong>of</strong> syntopic frog populations, Rana dalmatina and<br />

Rana temporaria, in suburban Vienna. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fur<br />

Okologie 29: 357-361.<br />

KUHN, J. 2001: Amphibien in der Wildflusslandschaft der oberen Isar (Bayern):<br />

Auswirkungen der "Teilruckleitung" seit 1990 und des Spitzenhochwassers


GOLLMANN, GOLLMANN, BAUMGARTNER & WARINGER Biota 3/1-2, 2002 41<br />

1999. Zeitschrift fur Feldherpetologie 8: 43-56.<br />

LAUFER, H. 2001: Amphibien in den Poldern Altenheim (Oberrhein, Baden-Wurttemberg):<br />

Bestandsentwicklung und Auswirkung von Hochwassern. Zeitschrift fur<br />

Feldherpetologie 8: 203-214.<br />

LAURILA, A. & AHO, T. 1997: Do female common frogs choose <strong>the</strong>ir breeding habitat to<br />

avoid predation on tadpoles? Oikos 78: 585-591.<br />

RIIS, N. 1988: The present distribution <strong>of</strong> Rana dalmatina and Rana temporaria in sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Scandinavia explained by a <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> competitive exclusion. Mem. Soc. Fauna<br />

Flora Fennica 64: 104-106.<br />

ROHRBACH, T. & KUHN, J. 1997: Der Springfrosch (Rana dalmatina) im westlichen<br />

Bodenseeraum 1994-1996: Verbreitung, Bestande, Laichgewasser. In: Krone, A.,<br />

Kiihnel.K.-D. & Berger.H. (eds:). Der Springfrosch (Rana dalmatina)- Okologie<br />

und Bestandssituation. Rana / Sonderheft 2, Rangsdorf: 251-261.<br />

UTSCHICK, H. 2001: Auswirkungen der Staustufe Perach auf die Amphibienbestande der<br />

Aue (Unterer Inn, Bayern) in der Wildflusslandschaft der oberen Isar (Bayern).<br />

Zeitschrift fur Feldherpetologie 8: 119-129.<br />

WILBUR, H.M. 1996: Multistage live cycles. In: Rhodes, O.E., Jr., Chesser, R.K. & Smith,<br />

M.H. (eds.) Population dynamics in ecological space and time. The University <strong>of</strong><br />

Chicago Press. Chicago & London: 75-108.


GROSSENBACHER 3/1-2, 2OO2 43<br />

First results <strong>of</strong> a 20-year-study on<br />

Common Toad Bufo bufo in <strong>the</strong><br />

Swiss Alps<br />

Kurt GROSSENBACHER<br />

Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Bernastrasse 15, CH-3005 Bern<br />

E-mail: groba@nmbe.unibe.ch<br />

Abstract<br />

From 1982 until 2001 a population <strong>of</strong> 150-200 Common Toad Bufo bufo on <strong>the</strong> Grosse<br />

Scheidegg near Grindelwald in <strong>the</strong> Bernese Alps (altitude 1850m) was registered every<br />

spring at <strong>the</strong> breeding site. The toads were marked in <strong>the</strong> first years with toe clipping,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> last 9 years with transponders. The number <strong>of</strong> first time breeders showed a deep<br />

depression in <strong>the</strong> late 80s and recovered in <strong>the</strong> nineteen-nineties. One third <strong>of</strong> all males<br />

and two thirds <strong>of</strong> all females reproduce only once. The maximum reproductive rate <strong>of</strong><br />

a female is seven times within 11 years. Most females reproduced every second year,<br />

but reproduction in two successive years is not rare. The maximum age observed is 25<br />

years, <strong>of</strong> a male marked in 1983 which was present at <strong>the</strong> breeding place during 16<br />

years. The maximum age <strong>of</strong> a female is 20 years. Reproduction success was very low in<br />

<strong>the</strong> nineteen-nineties, but an effect on <strong>the</strong> adult population has not yet appeared.<br />

Keywords: Bufo bufo, reproduction, age, longevity, population dynamics, high altitude,<br />

Swiss Alps.<br />

Received 29 October; accepted 18 December 2001


44 Biota 3/1-2,2002 GROSSENBACHER<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Hemelaar (1988) reported a 3-year study<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population structure <strong>of</strong> Common<br />

Toad, comparing several populations<br />

throughout Europe. All but one population<br />

were situated in lowlands, <strong>the</strong> only<br />

exception being a population above<br />

Grindelwald in <strong>the</strong> Swiss Alps. The Dutch<br />

herpetologists marked <strong>the</strong> animals with<br />

toe-clipping and analysed age by skeletochronology<br />

(Hemelaar et al. 1987).<br />

Our study picked up where Hemelaar<br />

left <strong>of</strong>f in 1985, focused on <strong>the</strong> same<br />

mountain population, and has continued<br />

through <strong>the</strong> 2001 breeding season. Here<br />

we examine aspects <strong>of</strong> 20 years <strong>of</strong> data<br />

coming from this population.<br />

STUDY AREA<br />

The site <strong>of</strong> this study <strong>of</strong> an alpine<br />

Common Toad population is situated<br />

above Grindelwald in <strong>the</strong> Bernese<br />

Oberland, below <strong>the</strong> pass Grosse<br />

Scheidegg. The altitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pass is<br />

1960 m and <strong>the</strong> pond, at 1850 m, is only<br />

a few meters from <strong>the</strong> road and easily<br />

accessible. The pond measures about 30<br />

x 10 m and <strong>the</strong> maximum depth is<br />

approximately one metre. The vegetation<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton alpinus,<br />

Sparganium angustifolium, Carex rostrata<br />

and Carex fusca and has clearly<br />

increased in cover over <strong>the</strong> last 20 years<br />

(pers. obs.). O<strong>the</strong>r resident amphibian<br />

populations include Triturus alpestris,<br />

Common Toad and a few Rana temporaria,<br />

<strong>the</strong> eggs and larvae <strong>of</strong> which are<br />

usually eliminated by <strong>the</strong> newts.<br />

METHODS<br />

As a basis (1982-1984) we had all <strong>the</strong><br />

individually marked toads <strong>of</strong> Hemelaar<br />

(1988). The initial objective was to follow<br />

<strong>the</strong> life histories <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> marked toads<br />

to <strong>the</strong> end.<br />

We initially avoided individual marking<br />

with toe clips because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

toes (4) that needed to be removed.<br />

Instead, we marked newly captured individuals<br />

by removing one toe upon first<br />

date <strong>of</strong> arrival, allowing <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong><br />

year classes (1985-1992). Later (1993-<br />

2001) we used transponders to identify<br />

individuals.<br />

We visited <strong>the</strong> pond during <strong>the</strong> evening<br />

every 4-5 days, starting each year at <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> snow-melt. It was impossible<br />

to find all toads during daylight<br />

because most were well-hidden in <strong>the</strong><br />

Carex-vegetation. At dusk (9:30 to<br />

10:00 p.m.) we started catching all animals<br />

we observed. The length and <strong>the</strong><br />

weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animals were measured,<br />

<strong>the</strong> toe-code or <strong>the</strong> current transponder<br />

number recorded and first-capture animals<br />

were fitted with a transponder. This<br />

process generally lasted 2-3 hours.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Only several first results can be presented<br />

here; <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> results is huge,<br />

and only a small part has been analyzed.<br />

The recapture rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> toads from<br />

1985 on, marked individually in 1982-84<br />

(143 males, 121 females), was generally<br />

low in <strong>the</strong> females, never exceeding 9<br />

females per year. The last female <strong>of</strong> this<br />

group was present in 1993 (female no.<br />

411, which came to breed 7 times within<br />

11 years). The decrease <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> males is<br />

slower and more regular, starting with 53<br />

recaptured males in 1985. The longest<br />

living male (No. 418) was regularly present<br />

at <strong>the</strong> breeding place for 16 years<br />

(1983-1998)! In contrast to <strong>the</strong> females,<br />

most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> long-lived males migrated<br />

every year to <strong>the</strong> site <strong>of</strong> reproduction.<br />

Table 1 presents <strong>the</strong> years <strong>of</strong> breeding <strong>of</strong><br />

those females <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group 1982-84<br />

who were present at least four times. In<br />

most cases a 2-year-cycle can be recognised.<br />

In some cases <strong>the</strong> females arrived<br />

in 2, and in rare cases 3, consecutive<br />

years. In <strong>the</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females no.<br />

195, 424 and 428 it is likely that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were present in at least one year


GROSSENBACHER Biota 3/i-a, ac 45<br />

Table 1. »Life story« <strong>of</strong> individually marked females which were present at least four<br />

times at <strong>the</strong> breeding place. X = present at <strong>the</strong> breeding place, but not weighed; 74:<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> a female before spawning; (55): weight <strong>of</strong> a female after having partially<br />

spawned.<br />

Female<br />

No.<br />

411<br />

151<br />

225<br />

82<br />

195<br />

424<br />

428<br />

1982<br />

X<br />

X<br />

1983<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

1984<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

1985<br />

72<br />

1986<br />

68<br />

61<br />

50<br />

between 1983 and 1987 or 1988 respectively,<br />

but <strong>the</strong>y escaped our control.<br />

In 1982-84 <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 108 males and 66<br />

females was determined by skeletochronology<br />

by Hemelaar et al. (1987).<br />

The combination with our recapture<br />

results enables us to present in Figure 1<br />

<strong>the</strong> final age <strong>the</strong>y reached. Most females<br />

don't get older than 10-12 years. This is<br />

<strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> sexual maturity and <strong>the</strong>y<br />

come only once to breed; few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m<br />

get older up to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 20 years.<br />

The males' ages are much more scat-<br />

1987<br />

75<br />

56<br />

48<br />

60<br />

66<br />

1988<br />

76<br />

63<br />

59<br />

70<br />

64<br />

1989<br />

74<br />

66<br />

72<br />

1990<br />

74<br />

64<br />

70<br />

1991<br />

74<br />

73<br />

1992<br />

67<br />

(55)<br />

1993<br />

82 7x<br />

6x<br />

5x<br />

4x<br />

4x<br />

4x<br />

4x<br />

tered; some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m reach sexual maturity<br />

at 5-7 years, normally at 8-10 years,<br />

but many get much older, with a maximum<br />

<strong>of</strong> 25 years.<br />

A very high proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females<br />

(62%) were present only once at <strong>the</strong><br />

breeding place (Figure 2); one quarter<br />

came twice, almost 10% 3 times, a.s.o.<br />

up to 7 times. One third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> males<br />

were present only once at <strong>the</strong> breeding<br />

place. The number <strong>of</strong> multiple breeders<br />

in males is irregularly scattered over <strong>the</strong><br />

scale up to 16 times. 25 males (17% <strong>of</strong><br />

Figure 1. Final age <strong>of</strong> 108 males and 66 females for which <strong>the</strong> age was determined in<br />

1982-84.<br />

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25<br />

Age in years


46 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 GROSSENBACHER<br />

Figure 2. Percentage <strong>of</strong> males and females present once, twice, three times a.s.o. at <strong>the</strong><br />

breeding place.<br />

50<br />

40<br />

20<br />

PI n „<br />

5x 7x 8x 9x 10x<br />

all individually followed males) were<br />

present in 8 to16 consecutive years. The<br />

mean value <strong>of</strong> presence for females is<br />

1.5 times, for males 3 times.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> males with determined age<br />

originated from <strong>the</strong> two years 1973 and<br />

1974, and most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females with<br />

known age from 1972 (Figure 3).<br />

Hemelaar et al. (1987) considered <strong>the</strong><br />

age structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spawning populations<br />

as unstable. This means a pulsation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> age classes occurs along <strong>the</strong> time<br />

axis, depending on <strong>the</strong> time span since<br />

<strong>the</strong> last year with high <strong>of</strong>fspring production.<br />

It seems that in several years before<br />

1972 very few or no <strong>of</strong>fspring survived<br />

(<strong>the</strong> age classes after 1974 were too<br />

young to be sexually mature in 82-84).<br />

When Hemelaar et al. (1987) analysed<br />

<strong>the</strong> population in 1982-84, <strong>the</strong>y found a<br />

relatively young population with no<br />

males older than 13 and no females<br />

older than 18. Several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se animals<br />

got much older than <strong>the</strong>se maximum<br />

presence at breeding place<br />

ages in <strong>the</strong> following 10-14 years. An<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> age structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

population in <strong>the</strong> early 90s would have<br />

come to a very different result, with a set<br />

<strong>of</strong> old animals, both females and males,<br />

around 20 years old. Thus an age analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> a toad population always depends<br />

on <strong>the</strong> space <strong>of</strong> time since <strong>the</strong> last year<br />

with a high recruitment. The reproductive<br />

success <strong>of</strong> such populations seems to<br />

vary from one year to <strong>the</strong> next to a very<br />

high extent. In many years <strong>the</strong> production<br />

is nearly zero, as in our case in <strong>the</strong><br />

late 60s until 1971. O<strong>the</strong>rwise, at least a<br />

few old animals should have survived<br />

until 1982-84. We observed a similar<br />

phenomenon during <strong>the</strong> 90s, with no<br />

year evidencing high recruitment. It is<br />

not yet clear if this is a normal fluctuation<br />

or <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> a population decline.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> long delay between birth<br />

and maturity (males 8-10, females 11-12<br />

years) a decline would only be observable<br />

in adults more than a decade later.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r interesting point is <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />

<strong>the</strong> years <strong>of</strong> high recruitment are differ-


GROSSENBACHER Biota 3/i-a, 2002 47<br />

Figure 3. Year <strong>of</strong> birth for males and females for which <strong>the</strong> age was determined in 1982-<br />

84.<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

d males<br />

• females<br />

1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980<br />

ent in males and females. 1972 (best<br />

year for females) was a cold summer<br />

with temperatures below <strong>the</strong> average<br />

from April to October and a very cold<br />

September. In 1973 (best year for males)<br />

<strong>the</strong> summer was much warmer, with a<br />

very warm August and September. 1974<br />

(good year for males) was again ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

cold with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> a very warm<br />

August. August is normally <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong><br />

metamorphosis; in cold years it is<br />

September.<br />

According to Piquet (1930), Common<br />

Toad produces a higher proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

females under cold water conditions, in<br />

warmer water a higher proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

males. One possible explanation for our<br />

observations is a temperature-dependent<br />

sex determination. But this can only<br />

be considered as an indication in this<br />

direction. O<strong>the</strong>r explanations, such as a<br />

different survival rate, are possible too.<br />

The result that 2/3 <strong>of</strong> all females breed<br />

only once is not surprising. Kuhn (1994)<br />

observed similar or higher rates <strong>of</strong> mortality.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> lowlands <strong>of</strong> England <strong>the</strong><br />

annual mortality was much higher with<br />

70-85% (Gittins et al. 1985, Reading<br />

1989). But in contrast to <strong>the</strong>se studies,<br />

we never found dead females in <strong>the</strong><br />

pond. We presume that overwintering<br />

stress is responsible for this high mortality.<br />

The cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> much higher life<br />

expectancy (20 years) in <strong>the</strong> mountains<br />

than in lowlands (Kuhn 1994: 9 years)<br />

can be found in <strong>the</strong> much shorter activity<br />

time per season which prevails at <strong>the</strong><br />

altitude <strong>of</strong> 1850 m a.s.l., between 3.5<br />

and 5 months. In accordance with this<br />

higher life expectancy it is not surprising<br />

that some females breed more <strong>of</strong>ten (6,<br />

even 7 times) than ever found in <strong>the</strong><br />

lowlands (Kuhn 1994: 5 times). The difference<br />

is ra<strong>the</strong>r small because a 2-yearcycle<br />

is more frequent in <strong>the</strong> mountains<br />

than in <strong>the</strong> plain. A detailed analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> relation between 1-year- and 2-yearcycles<br />

and a possible change <strong>of</strong> it will be<br />

presented in a later paper; more data<br />

must be collected. What is really new<br />

and astonishing about <strong>the</strong>se current<br />

observations is <strong>the</strong> extremely old age<br />

and long presence at <strong>the</strong> breeding place<br />

<strong>of</strong> several males. In most o<strong>the</strong>r studies<br />

males did not reach an age <strong>of</strong> 10 years,<br />

and a presence <strong>of</strong> 8 times or more at <strong>the</strong>


48 3/1-2, 2OO2 GROSSENBACHER<br />

breeding place is consequently impossible.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> extended longevity <strong>of</strong> toads<br />

in higher altitude populations, an analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> possible changes in <strong>the</strong> population<br />

structure cannot yet be made. A/lore<br />

research is necessary until <strong>the</strong> age class-<br />

es marked individually by transponders<br />

between 1993 and 95 have reached <strong>the</strong><br />

end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir lifespan. Even after 20 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> population marking, many questions<br />

are still open, and this long-term study<br />

must go on.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Thanks to A. Hemelaar for beginning <strong>the</strong> study and sharing data, to Peter Pearman,<br />

who helped me improving this manuscript, and to many colleagues and friends who<br />

helped me in <strong>the</strong> field over this long period, especially Silvia Zumbach and Beatrice<br />

Luscher.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

GITTINS, S.P., KENNEDY, R.I., WILLIAMS, R. 1985: Aspects <strong>of</strong> a population age-structure <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> common toad (Bufo bufo) at Llandrindod Wells Lake, mid-Wales. Brit. J.<br />

Herpetol., London 6: 447-449.<br />

HEMELAAR, A. 1988: Age, growth and o<strong>the</strong>r population characteristics <strong>of</strong> Bufo bufo from<br />

different latitudes and altitudes. Journal <strong>of</strong> Herpetology 22/4: 369-388.<br />

HEMELAAR, A., CLAESSEN, V., WIJNANDS, H. 1987: Enkele karakteristieken van een<br />

voortplantingspopulatie van de gewone pad (Bufo bufo) uit het gebergte van<br />

Zwitserland. Lacerta45:130-139.<br />

KUHN, J. 1994: Lebensgeschichte und Demographie von Erdkrotenweibchen Bufo bufo<br />

bufo (L.). Zeitschrift fur Feldherpetologie 1: 3-87.<br />

PIQUET, J. 1930: Determination du sexe chez les batraciens en fonction de la temperature.<br />

Rev. Suisse Zool. 37:173-281.<br />

READING, CJ. 1989: Annual fluctuations in common toad (Bufo bufo): breeding numbers<br />

at a pond in sou<strong>the</strong>rn England (1980-1889). Abstracts First World Congress <strong>of</strong><br />

Herpetology, 11-19 September 1989, University <strong>of</strong> Canterbury, United Kingdom.


GUICKING, JOCER & WINK Biota 3/1-2,2002 49<br />

Molecular Phylogeography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Viperine Snake Natrix maura and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Dice Snake Natrix tessellata:<br />

first results<br />

Daniela GUICKING1, Ulrich JOGER2,<br />

Michael WINK1<br />

1lnstitut fur Pharmazeutische Biologic, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, 69120 Heidelberg,<br />

Germany<br />

!Hessisches Landesmuseum, Zoologische Abteilung, Friedensplatz 1, 64283 Darmstadt,<br />

Germany<br />

E-mail: daniela.guicking@urz.uni-heidelberg.de<br />

Abstract<br />

First results on phylogeographic patterns, based on complete sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mitochondrial<br />

cytochrome b gene, are presented for Viperine Snake Natrix maura and Dice<br />

Snake Natrix tessellata. Three major phylogeographic clades are identified in N. maura.<br />

The phylogenetically oldest groups <strong>of</strong> haplotypes are found in Tunisia/Sardinia, and in<br />

Morocco; a third clade comprises all European specimens. Genetic distances (uncorrected<br />

p-distances) are 3.9% to 4.6% between major clades, but do not exceed 1.4%<br />

between different European populations. Due to higher genetic diversity in sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European range, it is suggested that <strong>the</strong> Iberian peninsula served as a glacial<br />

refugium, from where France and Northwestern Italy were colonized during postglacial<br />

times.<br />

In N. tessellata, genetic differences between distinct populations reach 8.2%. Major<br />

clades correspond to an apparently relict population in central Greece, to populations in<br />

Egypt/Jordan, Kasakhstan, Eastern Turkey, Crete and most <strong>of</strong> Europe. Within Europe<br />

<strong>the</strong> Balkan region is suggested to have served as a glacial refugium during <strong>the</strong><br />

Pleistocene. Apparently, a few lineages colonized central Europe in postglacial times and<br />

gave rise to <strong>the</strong> populations found today from Romania to Germany. Low but clear<br />

genetic differences between Italian and central European populations suggest that Italy<br />

was colonized by a distinct genetic lineage during <strong>the</strong> late Pleistocene and remained isolated<br />

from central European populations. These first results are consistent with general<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>ses on phylogeographic patterns and postglacial colonization routes in<br />

European animal and plant species.<br />

Key words: phylogeography, intraspecific diversity, Natrix maura, Natrix tessellata,<br />

cytochrome b<br />

Received 28 September; accepted 26 October 2001


50 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 GUICKING, JOGER & WINK<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Intraspecific differentiation <strong>of</strong> a species is<br />

a complex outcome <strong>of</strong> geographic,<br />

demographic and ecological factors that<br />

have operated throughout its evolutionary<br />

history (Walker & Avise 1998). It<br />

should be particularly apparent in taxa<br />

that show only limited mobility. As this is<br />

generally true for reptiles, most studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> intraspecific variability in <strong>the</strong>se vertebrates<br />

provide evidence for <strong>the</strong> existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> distinct lineages or morphotypes that<br />

can be well correlated to geographic<br />

regions (e.g. Emys orbicularis: Fritz 1996,<br />

Lenk et al. 1999, Natrix natrix: Thorpe<br />

1984a, Thorpe 1984b, reviewed in<br />

Kabisch 1999; Elaphe obsoleta: Burbrink<br />

et al. 2000). Designation <strong>of</strong> subspecies is<br />

<strong>the</strong> traditional way to account taxonomically<br />

for high intraspecific diversity and<br />

to distinguish lineages that differ by morphology,<br />

coloration, genetics and geographic<br />

distribution.<br />

The genus Natrix has recently been confined<br />

to <strong>the</strong> water snakes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> western<br />

palaearctic. It comprises four species:<br />

Viperine Snake Natrix maura, Dice Snake<br />

N. tessellata, Grass Snake N. natrix, and<br />

Big-head European Grass Snake N.<br />

megalocephala. However, <strong>the</strong> species<br />

status <strong>of</strong> N. megalocephala, which is<br />

restricted to a small area east and nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Black Sea (Orlow & Tunijew,<br />

1999), is controversial, due to its similarity<br />

to N. natrix (Bohme 1999). Molecular<br />

phylogenetic data <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus Natrix<br />

suggest that N. maura is <strong>the</strong> most ancestral<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three main species. N. tessellata<br />

and N. natrix are closely related and<br />

form <strong>the</strong> more derived sister group to N.<br />

maura. A detailed study on this topic will<br />

soon be published by R. Lawson et al.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> three main species, N. natrix<br />

shows <strong>the</strong> broadest ecological tolerance<br />

and <strong>the</strong> largest distribution area. It<br />

occurs throughout sou<strong>the</strong>rn and central<br />

Europe into England and Scandinavia,<br />

throughout great parts <strong>of</strong> Siberia east-<br />

wards to Lake Baikal, in <strong>the</strong> Middle East<br />

and in <strong>the</strong> most nor<strong>the</strong>rly parts <strong>of</strong> Africa<br />

(Kabisch 1999). N. maura and N. tessellata<br />

are ecologically more restricted and<br />

occupy similar ecological niches. Both<br />

species are highly dependent on aquatic<br />

habitats and need warmer climates than<br />

N. natrix. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong>ir distribution<br />

areas do not extend as far north (see Fig.<br />

2). N. maura is found in northwestern<br />

Africa, on <strong>the</strong> Iberian peninsula, in<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn France and in northwestern<br />

Italy (Schatti 1999). The range <strong>of</strong> N. tessellata<br />

extends from Italy throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

Balkan, Middle East, sou<strong>the</strong>rn Asia into<br />

China, and includes nor<strong>the</strong>rn Egypt<br />

(Gruschwitz et al. 1999). Isolated small<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Dice Snakes are found in<br />

western Germany and in <strong>the</strong> Czech<br />

Republic. The only sympatric populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dice Snake and Viperine Snake are<br />

found in northwestern Italy and at Lake<br />

Geneva in Switzerland. However, at Lake<br />

Geneva only N. maura is autochthonous,<br />

whereas N. tessellata was introduced by<br />

man (Mebert 1993).<br />

Intraspecific variability has been studied<br />

to some extent at least in all three<br />

species, but only in N. natrix have different<br />

subspecies been described to<br />

account for <strong>the</strong> high diversity (Thorpe<br />

1984a, Thorpe 1984b, reviewed in<br />

Kabisch 1999). In N. maura no subspecies<br />

are currently recognized<br />

although morphological studies have<br />

found some differences in pholidosis and<br />

colouration between geographically distant<br />

populations. However, <strong>the</strong>se differences<br />

appear too small and too inconsistent<br />

to justify designation <strong>of</strong> subspecies<br />

(Schatti 1999). In N. tessellata two subspecies<br />

are distinguished. The small population<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Romanian Black Sea island<br />

<strong>of</strong> Serpilor is separated as N. t heinrothi<br />

(Hecht 1930) from <strong>the</strong> nominate form N.<br />

t. tessellata, which includes all o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dice snake. According<br />

to Gruschwitz et al. (1999), <strong>the</strong> sub-


GUICKING, JOGER & WINK Biota 3/i-a, 2002 51<br />

species concept <strong>of</strong> N. tessellata needs to<br />

be revised.<br />

We have chosen a phylogeographic<br />

approach based on molecular data to<br />

investigate <strong>the</strong> intraspecific differentiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Viperine Snake and Dice Snake:<br />

1) to find out whe<strong>the</strong>r intraspecific<br />

genetic differentiation exists, 2) whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

genetic clades correlate to geographic<br />

regions, and 3) whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> results can<br />

be used to reconstruct a possible<br />

microevolutionary history for <strong>the</strong> species<br />

in Europe. In <strong>the</strong> present contribution we<br />

describe first results based on mitochondria!<br />

cytochrome b DMA sequences.<br />

AAATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

132 Dice Snakes and 80 Viperine Snakes<br />

were sampled covering great parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir distribution ranges. As a source <strong>of</strong><br />

total genomic DNA, blood samples taken<br />

from <strong>the</strong> caudal vein <strong>of</strong> living snakes, tissue<br />

samples collected from dead animals<br />

or museum material, and shed skins<br />

were used. DNA was isolated from small<br />

aliquots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples following standard<br />

proteinase k and phenol chlor<strong>of</strong>orm<br />

protocols (Sambrook et al. 1989).<br />

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was<br />

performed to amplify <strong>the</strong> target<br />

sequence using <strong>the</strong> primers L14724NAT<br />

(5'-GAC CTG CGG TCC GAA AAA CCA-<br />

3') and H16064 (5'-CTT TGG TTT ACA<br />

AGA ACA ATG CTT TA-3'; Burbrink et al.<br />

2000) situated in <strong>the</strong> two RNA-genes<br />

flanking <strong>the</strong> cytochrome b gene in reptiles.<br />

PCR was performed in 50 ul volume<br />

containing 0.75 units <strong>of</strong> Amersham<br />

Pharmacia Biotech Taq polymerase, 0.2<br />

mM <strong>of</strong> each dNTR 50 mM KCI, 1.5 mM<br />

MgCI2, 0.5% Triton x-100, 10 mM Tris-<br />

HCI (pH 8.5) and 0.01% BSA. 10 pmol<br />

<strong>of</strong> each primer and 50-100 ng <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

template DNA were used. After an initial<br />

denaturing step for 4 minutes at 94° C,<br />

31 cycles were performed with denaturing<br />

50 seconds at 94° C, annealing 50<br />

seconds at 52° C, and primer extension<br />

90 seconds at 72° C. A final extension<br />

step <strong>of</strong> 5 minutes at 72° C followed.<br />

PCR products were sequenced directly<br />

with <strong>the</strong> dideoxy chain termination<br />

method (Sanger et al. 1977) using <strong>the</strong><br />

Cycle Sequencing Kit (Amersham<br />

Pharmacia Biotech, RPN 2438/RPN<br />

2538) in combination with fluorescently<br />

labelled primers. For cycle sequencing<br />

primers mt-b2 (5'-GCC CAG AAm GAT<br />

ATT TGT CCT CA, modified from Kocher<br />

et al. 1989), NATf (5'-ACT CAG ATA<br />

TyG ATA AAA TCC C-3'), eNAT (5'-TAG<br />

GCA AAT AGr AAG TAT CAT TCT GG-<br />

3'), and mt-le (5'-TCA AAC CCG AAT<br />

GAT ACT TCC TAT T-3') were used. An<br />

initial denaturing step at 94° C for 3 minutes<br />

was followed by 26 cycles at 94° C<br />

(30 sec) and at 55° C (60 sec).<br />

Fluorescently labelled fragments were<br />

analysed on an automated Sequencer<br />

(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, ALF-<br />

Express II). The sequences were aligned<br />

manually. Complete cytochrome b gene<br />

sequences (1117 nt) were used for this<br />

study.<br />

Phylogenetic analyses were performed<br />

using <strong>the</strong> program packages MEGA<br />

(Kumar et al. 2001) and PAUP version<br />

4.0b8 (Sw<strong>of</strong>ford 2001). For outgroup<br />

rooting in N. maura <strong>the</strong> cytochrome b<br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> Nerodia fasdata (kindly provided<br />

by R. Lawson) and in N. tessellata<br />

sequences <strong>of</strong> N. maura were used.<br />

Maximum Parsimony analyses were conducted<br />

with <strong>the</strong> heuristic search<br />

approach <strong>of</strong> PAUP using <strong>the</strong> tree-bisection-and<br />

reconnection swapping algorithm.<br />

Bootstrap analyses were performed<br />

with <strong>the</strong> heuristic search<br />

approach. For comparison, Neighbor<br />

Joining and preliminary Maximum<br />

Likelihood trees with estimated parameters<br />

were calculated.


52 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 GUICKING, JOGER & WINK<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Natrix maura<br />

Phylogenetic analyses<br />

Neighbor Joining, Maximum Parsimony<br />

and preliminary Maximum Likelihood<br />

analyses yielded similar phylogenetic<br />

trees. The parsimony approach found<br />

eight shortest trees for N. maura phy-<br />

logeny. The strict consensus tree is<br />

shown in Figure 1. The intraspecific comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> different cytochrome b gene<br />

haplotypes for N. maura yielded 103<br />

variable sites (9.22% <strong>of</strong> all sites), <strong>of</strong><br />

which 82 (7.34%) are parsimony informative.<br />

99% or 100% bootstrap support was<br />

Figure 1. Natrix maura phylogeny: Strict consensus cladogram <strong>of</strong> 8 most parsimonious<br />

trees; lengths 295 steps (Cl = 0.8407, HI = 0.1593, Rl = 0.9226). Nerodia fasciata was<br />

used for outgroup rooting. Bootstrap values (500 replicates) <strong>of</strong> more than 50% are indicated<br />

at bifurcations for major lineages. Numbers following <strong>the</strong> localities indicate more<br />

than one identical sequence from <strong>the</strong> same location.<br />

Natrix<br />

maura<br />

99<br />

100<br />

100<br />

58<br />

97<br />

78<br />

87<br />

r Italy Ponte Organasco<br />

L Italy Voghera 2<br />

Switzerland Lake Geneva 6<br />

Spain Olot 2<br />

Spain Olot 2<br />

Spain Olot 2<br />

Spain Olot<br />

France Cote d'Azur<br />

Switzerland L'Allondon<br />

France Lac Bourget<br />

Italy Varzi<br />

Italy Sta. Maigheriia<br />

Italy Sta. Margherita 2<br />

Spain Amposta<br />

France Camargue<br />

France Niort 3<br />

Spain Pyrenees 2<br />

Spain Galicla 2<br />

France Dpt Herault<br />

France Belcastell<br />

France Lac Salagon 2<br />

Spain Delia de L'Ebre S<br />

p Spain Extremadura<br />

1 *- Spain Extremadura<br />

Spain Extremadura<br />

Spain Extremadura 3<br />

Spain Extremadura<br />

I Spain Extremadura<br />

Portugal Higuera<br />

r- Spain Extremadura<br />

f^- Spain Extremadura<br />

"1— Spain Benissa<br />

'— Spain Extremadura<br />

_r France Lac Salagon 2<br />

Spain Galicia<br />

Spain Extremadura<br />

Spain Benissa<br />

Tunisia Tamerza<br />

Sardinia 2<br />

Tunisia An Nafidah<br />

Tunisia Nabul<br />

Morocco Tabounaht 4<br />

Morocco Haut Atlas<br />

Morocco Haul Atlas 2<br />

Morocco Haut Atlas<br />

Morocco Tabounaht<br />

Morocco Tabounaht 2<br />

Morocco Moyen Atlas<br />

Nerodia fasdaia<br />

"European<br />

Clade"<br />

"Tunisian<br />

Clade"<br />

"Morrocan<br />

Clade"


GUICKING, JOGER & WINK Biota 3/i-a, 2002 53<br />

Figure 2. Location <strong>of</strong> sample sites and major mtDNA clades in Natrix maura (open symbols)<br />

and Natrix tessellata (black symbols). The dashed line indicates <strong>the</strong> distribution<br />

range <strong>of</strong> N. maura in <strong>the</strong> west and N. tessellata in <strong>the</strong> east. Different symbols represent<br />

different genetic clades, in N. maura: square: Moroccan clade, triangle: Tunisian clade,<br />

circle: European clade; in N. tessellata: rhomb: Egyptian clade, star: loannina clade, triangle:<br />

Turkish clade, square: Kazakhstan clade, cross: Crete clade, circle: European<br />

clade. Fat lines suggest approximate boundaries between mtDNA clades.<br />

obtained for three strictly monophyletic<br />

mtDNA clades <strong>of</strong> Viperine Snakes (Figure<br />

1). The three genetic clades correspond<br />

well to geographic locations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples<br />

(Figure 2). One clade is comprised<br />

<strong>of</strong> Viperine Snakes from Tunisia and<br />

Sardinia, one clade is located in<br />

Morocco, and <strong>the</strong> third clade comprises<br />

all European specimens.<br />

The two clades from nor<strong>the</strong>rn Africa are<br />

apparently phylogenetically older than<br />

<strong>the</strong> European clade. However, current<br />

data are not unambiguous in <strong>the</strong> positioning<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two African clades.<br />

Depending on <strong>the</strong> algorithm and optimality<br />

criterion used, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Tunisian<br />

clade or <strong>the</strong> Moroccan clade appears to<br />

be more ancestral. Bootstrap values <strong>of</strong> a<br />

little less than 50% for ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />

possibilities fur<strong>the</strong>r indicate that <strong>the</strong> positioning<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se clades relative to each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r cannot be reliably inferred from<br />

<strong>the</strong> cytochrome b data set.<br />

Close genetic relationship between<br />

Sardinian and Tunisian Viperine Snakes<br />

suggest that <strong>the</strong> Viperine Snake was<br />

introduced to Sardinia by man. This has<br />

already been suggested by Schatti<br />

(1999) due to morphological similarities<br />

<strong>of</strong> individuals from <strong>the</strong> two localities.<br />

Haplotypes and pairwise genetic comparisons<br />

Pairwise genetic distances are given as<br />

interclade and intraclade comparisons in<br />

Table 1. The three major clades are separated<br />

from each o<strong>the</strong>r by genetic distances<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3.9-4.6%. Intraclade distances<br />

reach 1.34% between different<br />

European samples. In all instances, <strong>the</strong><br />

interclade differences are greater than<br />

<strong>the</strong> intraclade distances, indicating that<br />

<strong>the</strong> three major clades represent independent<br />

evolutionary lineages.<br />

According to <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> molecular<br />

clock, genetic distances can provide<br />

information on <strong>the</strong> divergence time <strong>of</strong><br />

two distinct lineages. With an assumed<br />

evolutionary rate for snake mtDNA <strong>of</strong><br />

1.3% per one million years (de Queiroz


54 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 GUICKING, JOGER & WINK<br />

Table 1. Interclade and maximum intraclade genetic distances (p-distances) in a) Natrix<br />

maura and b) Natrix tessellata, based on complete sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mitochondrial<br />

cytochrome b gene.<br />

a) Natrix maura<br />

Glade "Tunisian" "Moroccan" "European"<br />

"Tunisian" 0.45%<br />

"Moroccan" 3.9-4.5% 0.90%<br />

"European" 3.9-4.6% 3.9-4.6% 1.34%<br />

b) Nafrix tessellata<br />

Glade "loannina"<br />

"loannina" 0.27%<br />

"Egyptian" 8.0-8.1%<br />

"Kazakhstan" 7.8-8.2%<br />

"Turkish" 7.4-8.1%<br />

"Crete" 7.9-8.1%<br />

"European" 7.3-8.1%<br />

et al. in press, adopted from Macey et al.<br />

1998, who obtained sequence divergence<br />

data for some agamid lizards), we<br />

can cautiously estimate <strong>the</strong> divergence<br />

time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three major clades in N.<br />

maura to some 3 to 3.5 million years<br />

ago, i.e., in <strong>the</strong> middle/late Pliocene.<br />

Larger sample sizes within <strong>the</strong> European<br />

clade allow some preliminary statements<br />

on <strong>the</strong> microevolutionary history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Viperine Snake in Europe. Intraclade<br />

genetic distances <strong>of</strong> 1.34% or less suggest<br />

that radiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European<br />

ancestor into present haplotypes started<br />

about one million years ago and corresponds<br />

well to <strong>the</strong> major Pleistocene<br />

glaciation cycles. Especially <strong>the</strong> last 700<br />

000 years were dominated by major<br />

glacials with a roughly 100 000 year<br />

cycle that alternated with relatively short<br />

interglacials (reviewed in Hewitt 1996).<br />

The climatic fluctuations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Pleistocene are known to have greatly<br />

influenced <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> intraspecific<br />

polymorphism in cold-sensitive species<br />

"Egyptian" "Kazakhstan" "Turkish"<br />

0.27%<br />

7.3-7.7%<br />

7.2-7.8%<br />

7.3%<br />

6.9-7.3%<br />

2.42%<br />

3.7^.9%<br />

6.6-6.8%<br />

6.4-7.0%<br />

3.13%<br />

5.6-6.8%<br />

5.6-7.0%<br />

"Crete" "European"<br />

0%<br />

2.96% 0.80%<br />

<strong>of</strong> European flora and fauna (Hewitt<br />

1996, Taberlet et al. 1998). Pleistocene<br />

climatic conditions caused extinction <strong>of</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn populations and contraction <strong>of</strong><br />

range to sou<strong>the</strong>rn refugia during cold<br />

periods as well as northward expansion<br />

from refugia during subsequent warmings<br />

(Hewitt 1996, Taberlet et al. 1998).<br />

Such processes imply successive bottlenecks<br />

and a loss <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity in<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn populations, whereas highest<br />

genetic diversity is expected in sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

refugia (Taberlet et al. 1998). The main<br />

Pleistocene refugia in Europe were located<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Iberian peninsula, in Italy and<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Balkans (e.g. Emys orbicularis:<br />

Lenk et al. 1999). Postglacial colonization<br />

<strong>of</strong> central Europe originated from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Balkan refugium or from <strong>the</strong> Iberian<br />

peninsula, whereas northward expansion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Italian populations in most species<br />

was prevented by <strong>the</strong> barrier <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alps<br />

(Taberlet et al. 1998).<br />

In N. maura, highest genetic diversity -<br />

indicated by distinct haplotypes occur-


GUICKING, JOGER & WINK<br />

ring in <strong>the</strong> same area (e.g. in <strong>the</strong><br />

Extremadura) or identical haplotypes<br />

occurring at geographically distant localities<br />

- is found on <strong>the</strong> Iberian peninsula,<br />

suggesting this as <strong>the</strong> main Pleistocene<br />

refugium. Samples from <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution range, that is<br />

northwestern Italy, Switzerland, <strong>the</strong> Cote<br />

d'Azur and Olot in Spain, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

hand, share closely related haplotypes<br />

(Figure 1). These regions were apparently<br />

colonized by a single lineage after <strong>the</strong><br />

last glaciation.<br />

Matrix tessellata<br />

Phylogenetic analyses<br />

In N. tessellata, six major phylogenetic<br />

clades can be distinguished, independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calculation method. The strict<br />

consensus tree <strong>of</strong> 96 most parsimonous<br />

trees is shown in Figure 3. Within <strong>the</strong><br />

ingroup, 218 variable sites (19.5% <strong>of</strong> all<br />

sites) were found in 1117 nucleotides <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> cytochrome b gene. 183 (16.4%) <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se are parsimony-informative.<br />

The two most ancestral clades correspond<br />

to samples from Egypt/Jordan and<br />

to an apparently isolated population<br />

from central Greece, Lake loannina<br />

(Figures 2, 3). Most samples from<br />

Turkey, toge<strong>the</strong>r with all samples from<br />

Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and<br />

Kazakhstan, form ano<strong>the</strong>r clade, which is<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r subdivided and <strong>the</strong>refore is treated<br />

here as two different clades, <strong>the</strong><br />

Kazakhstan clade and <strong>the</strong> Turkish clade.<br />

The best represented group corresponds<br />

to samples from Europe, except for those<br />

from Lake loannina. Because <strong>of</strong> high<br />

genetic distances between European<br />

mainland samples and samples from <strong>the</strong><br />

island <strong>of</strong> Crete (Table 1), we separate <strong>the</strong><br />

Crete samples as a clade <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own.<br />

Approximate geographic boundaries<br />

between different clades are indicated in<br />

Figure 2.<br />

The existence <strong>of</strong> a population with<br />

ancestral haplotypes at Lake loannina is<br />

55<br />

one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most surprising results <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study. Several scenarios can be drawn to<br />

explain <strong>the</strong> parapatric occurrence <strong>of</strong> different<br />

haplotypes in Greece. Both lineages<br />

might have descended from a common<br />

ancestor that inhabited Europe several<br />

million years ago and was <strong>the</strong>n biogeographically<br />

separated into different<br />

populations which evolved independently<br />

afterwards. The existence <strong>of</strong> a phylogenetically<br />

ancestral haplotype within<br />

<strong>the</strong> distribution area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more derived<br />

European haplotypes might fur<strong>the</strong>r suggest<br />

that Europe was inhabited by a different<br />

genetic lineage <strong>of</strong> Dice Snakes in<br />

<strong>the</strong> far past. This scenario would assume<br />

that <strong>the</strong> early European Dice Snakes<br />

became almost entirely extinct, with <strong>the</strong><br />

only descendants <strong>of</strong> that lineage today<br />

being left at Lake loannina, whereas <strong>the</strong><br />

present European haplotype has<br />

descended from a lineage that colonized<br />

Europe much later. A third possible<br />

explanation is that <strong>the</strong> population at<br />

Lake loannina derives from an anthropogenetically<br />

introduced population.<br />

However, this possibility seems less likely,<br />

because our data do not suggest any<br />

relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loannina haplotype to<br />

haplotypes found elsewhere, and <strong>the</strong><br />

region <strong>of</strong> Lake loannina is known to<br />

inhabit endemic lineages <strong>of</strong> several o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

organisms as well (P. Kyriakopoulou-<br />

Sklavounou, pers. cornm.).<br />

Haplotypes and pairwise genetic comparisons<br />

Genetic distances between <strong>the</strong> six clades<br />

are 3.0-8.2% (Table 1), suggesting independent<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most distant<br />

lineages since <strong>the</strong> early Pliocene.<br />

Intraclade genetic distances are smaller,<br />

reaching a maximum <strong>of</strong> 2.42% and<br />

3.13% in <strong>the</strong> two deeply subdivided<br />

clades <strong>of</strong> Kazakhstan and Turkish samples<br />

(Tab. 1). Samples from Crete are<br />

separated from mainland European samples<br />

by genetic distances <strong>of</strong> up to


56 3/1-2, 2OO2 GUICKING, JOGER & WINK<br />

Figure 3. Matrix tessellata phylogeny: Strict consensus cladogram <strong>of</strong> 96 most parsimonious<br />

trees; lengths 517 steps (Cl = 0.6716, HI = 0.3284, Rl = 0.9197). N. maura<br />

sequences were used for outgroup rooting. Bootstrap values (100 replicates) greater<br />

than 50% are indicated at bifurcations for major lineages. Numbers after <strong>the</strong> location<br />

indicate more than one identical sequence from <strong>the</strong> same location.<br />

71<br />

81<br />

|— 99<br />

100<br />

p Italy Lazio 4<br />

*- Italy Toscana<br />

p Switzerland Lago di Lugano<br />

*- Switzerland Lago di Lugano<br />

85 (~ Hungary Balaton<br />

*— Hungary Balaton<br />

S4 ,f Romania Tulcea<br />

— P- Romania Tulcea 3<br />

*— Romania Tulcea<br />

_ . . _<br />

r Turkey Sarkale 5<br />

J""1- Georgia Batumi<br />

lOpJLr Turkey Malatya<br />

j I *- Armenia Eranus<br />

n\ Azerbaijan Kubatly<br />

92<br />

nn r-T TurKey EsMK>9a<br />

LZZ-P" Turkey Yenioaga 5<br />

|_r Turkey Sinop<br />

^ Turkey Catalzeytin<br />

Turkey Biracik<br />

innrT Kazakhstan Alma-Ata<br />

98 f^P- Kazakhstan Alma-Ata 2<br />

tesseflata 10°<br />

' Georgia Agara<br />

r Eavut<br />

*- Jordan Jarash 2<br />

* «« r Greece Lake loannina<br />

1UU P- Greece Lake loannina<br />

|_r Greece Lake loannina<br />

"- Greece Lake loSnnina<br />

r~~ Nattix maura France Lac Bourget<br />

fj— Natrix maura Italy Ponte Organasco<br />

a<br />

' — • Matrix maura Spain Extremadura<br />

2.96%; <strong>the</strong> divergence time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />

lineages could <strong>the</strong>refore be estimated at<br />

a little more than two million years ago,<br />

i.e., at <strong>the</strong> transition <strong>of</strong> Pliocene and<br />

Pleistocene.<br />

Within <strong>the</strong> European Clade, genetic distances<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.80% suggest that radiation<br />

"European<br />

Clade"<br />

"Crete Clade"<br />

"Turkish<br />

Clade"<br />

"Kazakhstan<br />

Clade"<br />

"Egyptian Clade<br />

"loannina<br />

Clade"<br />

into present haplotypes occurred during<br />

<strong>the</strong> middle and late Pleistocene.<br />

Phylogenetic relationships are, however,<br />

only weakly resolved. Three apparently<br />

independent genetic lineages can be distinguished:<br />

one comprises samples from<br />

Lake Balaton in Hungary, one comprises


GUICKING, JOGER & WINK<br />

samples from Tulcea at <strong>the</strong> mouth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Danube river in Romania, and one<br />

includes <strong>the</strong> Italian and Swiss samples. A<br />

fourth lineage that is resolved by<br />

Neighbor Joining and Maximum<br />

Likelihood analyses, but does not appear<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Maximum Parsimony approach,<br />

includes all samples from Germany, <strong>the</strong><br />

Czech Republic and some samples from<br />

Bulgaria and Romania. The Balkan region<br />

most likely served as a Pleistocene<br />

refugium, from where <strong>the</strong> different lineages<br />

postglacially invaded <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present distribution area.<br />

A close relationship between Italian and<br />

Balkan specimens indicate that Italy did<br />

not play a major role as a glacial<br />

refugium in <strong>the</strong> Dice Snake, but was<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r colonized only during <strong>the</strong> late<br />

Pleistocene. Genetic distinction <strong>of</strong> Italian<br />

from central European Dice Snakes<br />

apparently reflects <strong>the</strong> barrier function <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Alps.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Our data show a remarkable intraspecific<br />

genetic subdivision <strong>of</strong> Viperine Snake<br />

and Dice Snake. Both species are composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> several monophyletic mtDNA<br />

clades that can be well correlated to geographic<br />

regions. Lack <strong>of</strong> co-existence <strong>of</strong><br />

major haplotypes and large genealogical<br />

gaps between most clades suggest long-<br />

Biota 3/i-a, Z, 2OO2 57<br />

term extrinsic barriers to gene flow<br />

(Walker & Avise 1998). Phylogeographic<br />

data from European specimens provide<br />

<strong>the</strong> first information on <strong>the</strong> microevolutionary<br />

history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two species in<br />

Europe. To complement <strong>the</strong> existing<br />

data, we would like to include fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

sample sites, especially from underrepresented<br />

regions and possible suture zones<br />

<strong>of</strong> different lineages. We are also planning<br />

to include nuclear markers in our<br />

study (ISSR-PCR genetic fingerprints, see<br />

Wink et al. 2001) to study possible introgression<br />

between adjacent lineages.<br />

Finally, <strong>the</strong> data presented here provide<br />

evidence for <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> distinct<br />

genetic lineages that have evolved independently<br />

over several million years,<br />

both in Viperine Snake and Dice Snake.<br />

Genetic distances between different<br />

clades are comparatively high and lie<br />

within <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> distances between<br />

closely related species and subspecies in<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r reptiles (Johns & Avise 1998, de<br />

Queiroz et al. in press). Therefore, our<br />

data provide a first basis for a taxonomic<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two species. Distinction<br />

<strong>of</strong> different lineages, at least at <strong>the</strong> subspecies<br />

level, seems desirable to account<br />

for <strong>the</strong> high intraspecific variability.<br />

However, morphological studies need to<br />

be performed to accomplish such a taxonomic<br />

revision.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We are very grateful to all those who have supported and still support our study by collecting<br />

or providing sample material. These are: T. Amann, P. Lenk, H.-P. Eckstein, P.<br />

Godlay, A. Pieh, X. Bonnet, S. Ursenbacher, E. Razzetti, A. Hille, M. Gruschwitz, S. Lenz,<br />

A. Herzberg, W. Fiedler, A. Sproll, A. K. Smole-Wiener, B. Gautschi, D. Modry, M. A. L.<br />

Zuffi, N. Godetsch, G. Mantziou, N. Rastegar-Pouyani, R. Griffiths, D. Ristow, N. Orlov,<br />

S. Tome, A. Kapla, M. Vogrin, U. Utiger and many o<strong>the</strong>rs. Samples from <strong>the</strong> mouth <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Ebro river in Spain were provided by X. Santos and collected with permission from<br />

<strong>the</strong> "Direccio General del Medi Natural, Generalitat de Catalunya" no. 6539<br />

(26.10.1990). The "Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion Nord" in Koblenz, Germany,<br />

gave permission to collect samples <strong>of</strong> German Dice Snakes. We thank R. Lawson for his<br />

constant help with emerging problems and for providing unpublished sequences. A.<br />

Rasmussen and M. Ivanov will probably note that we tried to keep in mind some <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir helpful critiques given at <strong>the</strong> <strong>SEH</strong> meeting in Slovenia. Our study is financially sup-


58 Biota 3/1-2, 2002 GUICKING, JOGER & WINK<br />

ported by <strong>the</strong> Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (JO-134/7 and WI-719/18).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BOHME, W. 1999: Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, Bd. 3/IIA (Schlangen<br />

II). Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden: 482.<br />

BURBRINK, F. T., LAWSON, R. & SLOWINSKI, J. B. 2000: Mitochondrial DMA phylo- geography<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> polytypic North American Rat Snake (Elaphe obsoleta): A cri-tique<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subspecies concept. Evolution 54: 2107-2118.<br />

De QUEIROZ, A., LAWSON, R. & LEMOS ESPINAL, J. A. 2002: Phylogenetic relation- ships<br />

<strong>of</strong> North American Garter Snakes (Thamnophis) based on four mito chondrial<br />

genes: How much DNA sequence is enough. A/lolekular Phylogenetics and<br />

Evolution 22: 315-329.<br />

FRITZ, U. 1996: Zur innerartlichen Variabilitat von Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus, 1758). 5b.<br />

Intraspezifische Hierarchie und Zoogeographie (Reptilia: Testudines: Emydidae).<br />

Zoologische Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde Dresden 49: 31-<br />

71.<br />

GRUSCHWITZ, M., LENZ, S., MEBERT, K. & LANKA, V. 1999: Matrix tessellata (Laurenti,<br />

1768) - Wurfelnatter. In: W. Bohme. Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien<br />

Europas, Bd. 3/IIA (Schlangen II). Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden: 581- 644.<br />

HECHT, G. 1930: Systematik, Ausbreitungsgeschichte und Oekologie der europaischen<br />

Arten der Gattung Tropidonotus (Kuhl) H. Boie. Inaugural-Dissertation, Univ.<br />

Berlin.<br />

HEWITT, G. M. 1996: Some genetic consequences <strong>of</strong> ice ages, and <strong>the</strong>ir role in diver gence<br />

and speciation. Biological Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Linnean Society 58: 247-276.<br />

JOHNS, G. C. & AVISE, J. C. 1998: A comparative summary <strong>of</strong> genetic distances in <strong>the</strong> vertebrates<br />

from <strong>the</strong> mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Molecular Biology and<br />

Evolution 15: 1481-1490.<br />

KABISCH, K. 1999: Natrix natrix (Linnaeus, 1758) - Ringelnatter. In: W. Bohme. Handbuch<br />

der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, Bd. 3/IIA (Schlangen II). Aula-Verlag,<br />

Wiesbaden: 513-580.<br />

KOCHER, T. D., THOMAS, W. K., MEYER, A. EDWARDS, S. V., PAABO, S., VILLABLANCA,<br />

F. X. & WILSON, A. C. 1989: Dynamics <strong>of</strong> mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals:<br />

Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, USA 86: 6196-6200.<br />

KUMAR, S.r TAMURA, K., JAKOBSEN, I. B. & NEI, M. (2001): MEGA: Molecular<br />

Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, Version 2.0. Pennsylvania State University, PA,<br />

USA.<br />

LENK, P., FRITZ, U., JOGER, U. & WINK, M. 1999: Mitochondrial phylogeography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

European pond turtle, Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus 1758). Molecular Ecology 8:<br />

1911-1922.<br />

MACEY, J. R., SCHULTE, J. A., ANANJEVA, N. B., LARSON, A., RASTEGAR-POUYANI, N.,<br />

SHAMMAKOV, S. M. & PAPENFUSS, T. J. 1998: Phylogenetic relationships<br />

among agamid lizards <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Laudakia caucasia species group: testing hypo<strong>the</strong>ses<br />

<strong>of</strong> biogeographic fragmentation and an area cladogram for <strong>the</strong> Iranian<br />

Plateau. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 118-131.<br />

MEBERT, K. 1993: Untersuchung zur Morphologie und Taxonomie der Wurfelnatter Natrix<br />

tessellata (Laurenti 1768) in der Schweiz und im sudlichen Alpenraum.<br />

Diplomarbeit, Univ. Zurich.<br />

ORLOW, N. L. & TUNIJEW, B. S. 1999: Natrix megalocephala Orlow und Tunijew, 1987 -<br />

GroBkopf-Ringelnatter. In: W. Bohme. Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien<br />

Europas, Bd. 3/IIA (Schlangen II). Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden: 505- 512.


GUICKING, JOCER & WINK >ta 3/1-2, 2002 59<br />

SAMBROOK, J., FRITSCH, E. F. & MANIATIS, T. 1989: Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual.<br />

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.<br />

SANGER, F., NICKLEN, S. & COULSON, A. R. 1977: DNA sequencing with chain-ter- minating<br />

inhibitors. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, USA 74: 5463-<br />

5467.<br />

SCHATTI, B. 1999: Natrix maura (Linnaeus, 1758) - Vipernatter. In: W. Bohme. Handbuch<br />

der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, Bd. 3/IIA (Schlangen II). Aula-Verlag,<br />

Wiesbaden: 483-503.<br />

SWOFFORD, D. L. 2001: PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Methods), Version 4.0b8. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.<br />

TABERLET, P., FUMAGALLI, L., WUST-SAUCY, A.-G. & COSSON, J.-F. 1998: Comparative<br />

phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Molecular Ecology<br />

7: 453-464.<br />

THORPE, R. S. 1984a: Geographic variation in <strong>the</strong> Western grass snake (Natrix natrix helvetica)<br />

in relation to hypo<strong>the</strong>sized phylogeny and conventional subspecies.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Zoology, London 203: 345-355.<br />

THORPE, R. S. 1984b: Multivariate patterns <strong>of</strong> geographic variation between <strong>the</strong> island and<br />

mainland populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern grass snake (Natrix natrix natrix). Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Zoology, London 204: 551 -561.<br />

WALKER, D. & AVISE, J. C. 1998: Principles <strong>of</strong> phylogeography as illustrated by fresh water<br />

and terrestrial turtles in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern United States. Annual Reviews in<br />

Ecology and Systematics 29: 23-58.<br />

WINK, M., GUICKING, D. & FRITZ, U. 2001: Molecular evidence for hybrid origin <strong>of</strong><br />

Mauremys iversoni Pritchard et McCord, 1991, and Mauremys pritchardi<br />

McCord, 1997 (Reptilia: Testudines: Bataguridae). Zoologische Abhandlungen<br />

Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde Dresden 51: 41-49


HAILEY & LAMBERT Biota 3/1-2,2002 61<br />

Comparative growth patterns in<br />

Afrotropical giant tortoises<br />

(genus Geochelone)<br />

Adrian HAILEY1 & Michael R.K. LAMBERT2*<br />

'Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe, PO Box MP167, Mount<br />

Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe<br />

Present address: School <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Bristol, Woodland Road,<br />

Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom<br />

E-mail: adrian.hailey@bristol.ac.uk<br />

"Corresponding author: Natural Resources Institute, University <strong>of</strong> Greenwich at<br />

Medway, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, United Kingdom<br />

Present address: Environmental Initiatives, Lydbrook House, Upper Lydbrook,<br />

Gloucestershire GL17 9LP, United Kingdom<br />

E-mail: lambertmrk@aol.com<br />

Abstract<br />

Growth to huge sizes is characteristic <strong>of</strong> giant tortoises. Growth data for leopard tortoises<br />

Geochelone pardalis in eastern and sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa, <strong>the</strong> continental Sahelian<br />

giant tortoise Geochelone sulcata, and <strong>the</strong> insular Aldabran giant tortoise Geochelone<br />

gigantea are reanalysed, and <strong>the</strong>ir growth patterns compared. Geochelone pardalis<br />

shows great body size variation, with size in nor<strong>the</strong>rn populations (Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Somaliland) comparable to that <strong>of</strong> insular giant tortoises. All species and populations fitted<br />

a two-phase growth curve: an initial asymptotic growth period followed by slow<br />

indeterminate linear growth. Asymptotic growth was non-Bertalanffy in all groups,<br />

most individuals fitting Gompertz or logistic-by-mass models best Juvenile growth (for<br />

ages 3-8) was also approximately linear. Variation in populations and species was in<br />

juvenile growth rate, asymptotic size, rate <strong>of</strong> subsequent indeterminate linear growth,<br />

and old age survival rate. Juvenile growth rates and asymptotic sizes <strong>of</strong> G. pardalis from<br />

Somaliland resembled o<strong>the</strong>r populations, with large mean size due to high survival rates<br />

and continued linear growth after <strong>the</strong> asymptote. Juvenile growth rates and indeterminate<br />

linear growth in Geochelone sulcata resembled those <strong>of</strong> G. pardalis, but larger<br />

asymptotic sizes were reached. Geochelone gigantea had much higher juvenile growth<br />

rates than <strong>the</strong> continental species, and asymptotic size and rate <strong>of</strong> subsequent indeterminate<br />

linear growth were lower in a high-density (Grande Terre) population - with size<br />

achieved by G. sulcata similar - than a low-density (lie Malabar) one. Juvenile growth<br />

rate was unaffected by population density, and relative to larger tortoises was higher in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Grande Terre population, <strong>the</strong> only group to approach Bertalanffy-type growth.<br />

Key words: Africa, asymptotic size, Geochelone, growth curve, growth rate, tortoise<br />

Received 1 September 2001; accepted 23 February 2002


62 Biota 3/1-2,2002 HAILEY & LAMBERT<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Growth to huge sizes is perhaps <strong>the</strong> most<br />

striking feature <strong>of</strong> giant tortoises. There<br />

are five Afrotropical species; two are on<br />

<strong>the</strong> mainland continent <strong>of</strong> Africa. The<br />

leopard tortoise Geochelone pardalis has<br />

an extensive north-south range in eastern<br />

and sou<strong>the</strong>rn E. & S. Africa, while <strong>the</strong><br />

African spurred or Sahelian giant tortoise<br />

Geochelone sulcata has an east-west<br />

range across <strong>the</strong> Sahelian region (Iverson<br />

1992).<br />

Geochelone pardalis in populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Somalia's North-West Zone (Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Somaliland) (hereafter referred to as<br />

Somaliland) have been shown to be substantially<br />

larger than in those fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

south, especially between <strong>the</strong> Equator<br />

and Tropic <strong>of</strong> Capricorn. Size frequencies<br />

indicate that on average, Somaliland tortoises<br />

even exceed those in <strong>the</strong> eastern<br />

Cape Province, South Africa (Lambert et<br />

al. 1998), where <strong>the</strong> largest individuals<br />

<strong>of</strong> this species have been recorded<br />

(Branch et al. 1990).<br />

Geochelone pardalis in Somaliland experience<br />

wet summers, with copious green<br />

vegetation available as food, and cool<br />

dry winters when refuge is sought and<br />

activity is minimal. A not dissimilar climatic<br />

regime prevails also in <strong>the</strong> Sahelian<br />

region <strong>of</strong> Africa, from Mauritania and<br />

Senegal in <strong>the</strong> west to Eritrea and<br />

Ethiopia in <strong>the</strong> east, coincident with <strong>the</strong><br />

range <strong>of</strong> C. sulcata, <strong>the</strong> world's largest<br />

mainland tortoise. The size <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Sahelian tortoise was approached by<br />

large individual G. pardalis in Somaliland.<br />

Large size could thus be due to <strong>the</strong> similarity<br />

<strong>of</strong> climatic conditions, which may<br />

be particularly favourable for growth in<br />

both <strong>the</strong> Sahelian region and nor<strong>the</strong>rnmost<br />

Somaliland.<br />

The main aim <strong>of</strong> this work, <strong>the</strong>refore,<br />

was to compare growth <strong>of</strong> G. pardalis<br />

tortoises in Somaliland with that <strong>of</strong> G.<br />

pardalis from o<strong>the</strong>r regions in E. & S.<br />

Africa, and also with Sahelian G. sulcata.<br />

In particular, this was to show whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

large size in Somaliland was due only to<br />

a high growth rate, which could be purely<br />

environmental, or to a different<br />

growth pattern, which is more likely to<br />

reflect genetic differences associated<br />

with speciation.<br />

This alludes to an important question <strong>of</strong><br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r growth differences in tortoises<br />

are phenotypic or genetic. Growth <strong>of</strong><br />

tortoises is not suited to experimental<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> this problem, because many<br />

differences are based on <strong>the</strong> timing <strong>of</strong><br />

reduced growth at <strong>the</strong> asymptote, and<br />

would require study over several decades<br />

to obtain <strong>the</strong> answer. Any interspecific<br />

differences, such as between G. pardalis<br />

and G. sulcata, must have a genetic<br />

basis. The possible importance <strong>of</strong> phenotypic<br />

effects can be judged by comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> closely-related populations in different<br />

ecological conditions.<br />

Neighbouring island populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Aldabra giant tortoise Geochelone<br />

gigantea on Aldabra Atoll, Indian Ocean,<br />

differ markedly in population density,<br />

and so growth in this species was examined<br />

in two such populations based on<br />

data in Bourn & Coe (1978). Geochelone<br />

gigantea is one <strong>of</strong> three extant giant tortoise<br />

species inhabiting islands in <strong>the</strong><br />

Indian Ocean, but <strong>the</strong> only one with<br />

substantial populations remaining.<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> growth in G. pardalis have<br />

been made by several investigators in<br />

Somaliland and elsewhere in E. & S.<br />

Africa (Lambert 1995); Serengeti<br />

National Park, N.E. Tanzania (Lambert et<br />

al. 1998), and in <strong>the</strong> Sengwa Wildlife<br />

Research Area, W. Zimbabwe (Hailey &<br />

Coulson 1999).<br />

An outline <strong>of</strong> main results is given in this<br />

account; data in more detail have been<br />

published elsewhere (Hailey & Lambert<br />

2002).<br />

METHODS<br />

Growth measurements, based on growth


HAILEY & LAMBERT 1-2, 2O02 63<br />

rings, were made on G. pardalis in four<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> eastern and sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa,<br />

on G. sulcata in <strong>the</strong> western Sahel, and<br />

on C. gigantea on two islets <strong>of</strong> Aldabra<br />

Atoll, Indian Ocean.<br />

The straight-line size measurement (in<br />

mm) used for all three tortoise species,<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r from direct measurement or calculated<br />

(Bourn & Coe 1978, Lambert 1993,<br />

Lambert 1995, Lambert et al. 1998,<br />

Hailey & Coulson 1999), was <strong>the</strong> midline<br />

straight carapace length (intermarginal<br />

notch to supracaudal scute). Tortoises<br />

were also weighed to within 0.5 kg up to<br />

50 kg, and 1 kg above 50 kg. For consistency,<br />

a single relationship between mass<br />

(in g) and length was used for all populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> C. pardalis.<br />

The growth pattern in chelonians has<br />

been described by a variety <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical<br />

models. As adopted by Hailey &<br />

Coulson (1999), a number <strong>of</strong> FORD-<br />

WALFORD plots may be used to fit<br />

BERTALANFFY, GOMPERTZ, logistic by<br />

length or logistic by mass growth curves.<br />

This provides a simple method for distinguishing<br />

between major types <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

model, and thus <strong>the</strong> growth pattern in<br />

animals. FORD-WALFORD plots are<br />

especially useful in chelonians, with<br />

growth histories represented by yearly<br />

deposition <strong>of</strong> keratinous rings, and<br />

depend on <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> a large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> growth increments to give a<br />

significant negative regression for one or<br />

more growth curves. Excluding <strong>the</strong> possibly<br />

incomplete outer growth ring <strong>of</strong> all<br />

tortoises, only individuals with 10+ increments<br />

(i.e. with 11+ usable growth rings<br />

and 12+ in total) were used.<br />

Following Hailey & Coulson (1999), and<br />

using a common size measure, tortoise<br />

populations were compared by means <strong>of</strong><br />

FORD-WALFORD graphical plots to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> growth patterns. These<br />

methods were applied to G. sulcata to<br />

show whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> large G. pardalis from<br />

Somaliland had growth more similar to<br />

this species (with which it has a slightly<br />

overlapping geographical range in S. E.<br />

Ethiopia; Lambert 1999) or to o<strong>the</strong>r populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> G. pardalis.<br />

Asymptotic size was estimated from <strong>the</strong><br />

intercept on <strong>the</strong> x axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> best-fitting<br />

significant negative regression <strong>of</strong> a<br />

FORD-WALFORD plot on BERTA-<br />

LANFFY, GOMPERTZ or logistic by<br />

length or mass axes.<br />

The BERTALANFFY plot may in some<br />

cases give a significant positive slope<br />

with few data points, where only <strong>the</strong> initial<br />

increasing phase <strong>of</strong> growth is represented.<br />

This is not a fit to <strong>the</strong> BERTA-<br />

LANFFY curve as such, since this requires<br />

decreasing growth rate to an asymptotic<br />

size. A positive slope only would give <strong>the</strong><br />

nonsensical result <strong>of</strong> continuously accelerating<br />

growth to an infinite size.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The Leopard Tortoise Geochelone<br />

pardalis<br />

For G. pardalis, <strong>the</strong> BERTALANFFY<br />

model did not give <strong>the</strong> best fit for any<br />

tortoise in any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four regions.<br />

Tortoises from Somaliland and Serengeti<br />

mostly fitted GOMPERTZ (17 individuals)<br />

or logistic by mass (15 individuals)<br />

models best, with <strong>the</strong> remaining seven<br />

individuals fitting <strong>the</strong> logistic by length<br />

model best. Tortoises from E. & S. Africa<br />

mostly fitted <strong>the</strong> GOMPERTZ model best<br />

(15/19 individuals), while most <strong>of</strong> those<br />

from Sengwa fitted <strong>the</strong> logistic by mass<br />

model best (20/23 individuals).<br />

For all regions in which G. pardalis were<br />

measured in sub-Saharan Africa, growth<br />

increments showed an early growth rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10-15 mm/yr in years 1-2. Compared<br />

to Somaliland tortoises, <strong>the</strong> growth rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> museum E. & S. Africa tortoises<br />

increased only slightly, to about 15<br />

mm/yr, although <strong>the</strong> variation in growth<br />

rate with age was significant (ANOVA,<br />

F1W56 = 1.89, P < 0.02) over <strong>the</strong> years 1 -<br />

16. The relatively flat growth pattern <strong>of</strong>


64 Biota 3/1-2,2002 HAILEY & LAMBERT<br />

E. & S. Africa tortoises explains why <strong>the</strong><br />

GOMPERTZ model fits <strong>the</strong>se animals<br />

best. In o<strong>the</strong>r regions, after an increasing<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> growth, <strong>the</strong> rate declined in older<br />

animals where <strong>the</strong>re were data available.<br />

For Serengeti and Sengwa tortoises,<br />

asymptotic size in males and females was<br />

significantly different, and so growth<br />

increments were examined separately for<br />

<strong>the</strong> sexes in <strong>the</strong>se two regions.<br />

From growth curves constructed for G.<br />

pardalis from different regions in sub-<br />

Saharan Africa, growth in museum specimens<br />

from E. & S. Africa appeared to be<br />

much slower. However, differences in<br />

growth in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three regions were<br />

small. After 12 years, <strong>the</strong> divergent<br />

growth data among <strong>the</strong>se regions is due<br />

to small and changing sample sizes.<br />

Asymptotic sizes in G. pardalis from,<br />

respectively, Sengwa, Serengeti, E. & S.<br />

Africa and Somaliland were fairly consistent,<br />

with ascending means <strong>of</strong> 295 ±<br />

S.D. 33, 324 ± S.D. 63, 337 ± S.D. 117<br />

and 344 ± S.D. 113 mm, and <strong>the</strong>re was<br />

no significant difference between <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Initial sizes at growth ring 0 (hatchling<br />

size), with ascending means <strong>of</strong> 31 ± S.D.<br />

6, 45 ± S.D. 7, 47 ± S.D. 8 and 55 ± S.D.<br />

4 mm in, respectively, E. & S. Africa,<br />

Somaliland, Serengeti and Sengwa tortoises,<br />

did, however, differ significantly<br />

in <strong>the</strong> four regions (F3,?9 = 52.3,<br />

P


HAILEY & LAMBERT Biota 3/i-a, 2002 65<br />

taken up to 27 years for <strong>the</strong> lie Malabar<br />

population and 17 years for <strong>the</strong> population<br />

on Grande Terre. Growth curves for<br />

<strong>the</strong> two C. gigantea populations, one <strong>of</strong><br />

low density (lie Malabar) and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>of</strong> high density (Grande Terre), were<br />

compared with that <strong>of</strong> G. sulcata.<br />

Juvenile growth rate <strong>of</strong> G. gigantea over<br />

years 3-6 did not differ between low<br />

density lie Malabar and high density<br />

Grande Terre populations. Juvenile<br />

growth rate at 37.6 mm/yr was almost<br />

twice <strong>the</strong> mean <strong>of</strong> 21.6 ± S.D. 7.9<br />

mm/yr for G. pardalis.<br />

Growth ring increments for G. gigantea<br />

over <strong>the</strong> first 17 years were also used to<br />

fit FORD-WALFORD plots, lie Malabar<br />

mean data fitted <strong>the</strong> GOMPERTZ curve<br />

best, and <strong>the</strong> BERTALANFFY curve least<br />

well; asymptotic size was 613 mm.<br />

Grande Terre data also fitted <strong>the</strong> GOM-<br />

PERTZ curve best, and <strong>the</strong> BERTA-<br />

LANFFY curve least well, but asymptotic<br />

size at 470 mm was much smaller.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> reduced adult growth, but<br />

normal juvenile growth in <strong>the</strong> dense<br />

population, <strong>the</strong> Grande Terre tortoises<br />

are indeed <strong>the</strong> only ones to which <strong>the</strong><br />

BERTALANFFY curve provides a reasonable<br />

fit, although <strong>the</strong> GOMPERTZ curve<br />

is <strong>the</strong> best fit.<br />

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

All species and populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Afrotropical tortoises under discussion<br />

fitted a two-phase growth curve, with an<br />

initial period <strong>of</strong> asymptotic growth up to<br />

about 20 years followed by indeterminate<br />

linear growth. Asymptotic growth<br />

was non-BERTALANFFY in all populations,<br />

and juvenile growth was approximately<br />

linear over years 3-8.<br />

Adult size <strong>of</strong> G. gigantea from <strong>the</strong> dense<br />

Grande Terre population was similar to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> G. sulcata, and to old Somaliland<br />

G. pardalis. Thus all can be grouped as<br />

»giant tortoises*, but <strong>the</strong>y achieve huge<br />

sizes in different ways. The differences lie<br />

in <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> juvenile growth, <strong>the</strong><br />

asymptotic size reached, <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> linear<br />

growth after this, and <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong><br />

this period <strong>of</strong> slow growth.<br />

Changes in <strong>the</strong>se variables accounted for<br />

all <strong>the</strong> growth curves observed:-<br />

* Slow juvenile growth - G. pardalis in E.<br />

& N. Africa<br />

* Fast juvenile growth - G. gigantea on<br />

Aldabra.<br />

* Higher asymptote than G. pardalis - G.<br />

sulcata in <strong>the</strong> western Sahel, and G.<br />

gigantea on Aldabra, especially on lie<br />

Malabar<br />

* Faster overall growth than o<strong>the</strong>r tortoises<br />

- G. gigantea on lie Malabar<br />

* Longer-continued late linear growth <strong>of</strong><br />

old animals - G. pardalis in Somaliland.<br />

The high rate <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> G. gigantea<br />

may be due to a longer activity season<br />

with tropical maritime conditions on<br />

Aldabra compared to mainland Africa.<br />

Geochelone gigantea on lie Malabar<br />

were active throughout <strong>the</strong> year, while<br />

adults on Grande Terre, due to <strong>the</strong> lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> feeding opportunities in shade, were<br />

inactive for no more than two months<br />

during <strong>the</strong> dry season. In contrast, G.<br />

pardalis at Sengwa and G. sulcata in <strong>the</strong><br />

western Sahel were inactive for five<br />

months <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry season.<br />

The reduced body size <strong>of</strong> tortoises in <strong>the</strong><br />

dense Grande Terre population, compared<br />

to those on lie Malabar without<br />

<strong>the</strong> same ecological constraints, is a<br />

proven case <strong>of</strong> environmental effects.<br />

With possible access to a different range<br />

<strong>of</strong> herbaceous food species from adults,<br />

juveniles on Grand Terre appear to be<br />

shielded from competition with adults.<br />

The high growth rates in early years give<br />

a closer approximation to a BERTA-<br />

LANFFY-type growth curve than in any<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r species or population.


66 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 HAILEY & LAMBERT<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> travel and subsistence for M.R.K.L to attend <strong>the</strong> 11th Ordinary General Meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> Societas Europaea Herpetologica in 2alec (near Celje), Slovenia, 13-17 July 2001,<br />

was covered by <strong>the</strong> Higher Education Funding Council <strong>of</strong> England (HEFCE) through<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Natural Resources Institute, University <strong>of</strong> Greenwich at Medway<br />

(Chatham), who also provided time for meeting participation, preparation <strong>of</strong> an oral<br />

presentation and manuscript writing for <strong>the</strong> <strong>proceedings</strong> volume.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BOURN, D. & COE, M. 1978. The size, structure and distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> giant tortoise population<br />

<strong>of</strong> Aldabra. Philosophical Transactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Royal Society London (B)<br />

282:139-175.<br />

BRANCH, W. R., BAARD, E. & DE VILLIERS, A. 1990. Some exceptionally large south- ern<br />

African chelonians. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Herpetological Association <strong>of</strong> Africa 37: 53-54.<br />

HAILEY, A. & COULSON, I. M. 1999. The growth pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> African tortoise<br />

Geochelone pardalis and o<strong>the</strong>r chelonians. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Zoology 77:<br />

181-193.<br />

HAILEY, A. & LAMBERT, M.R.K. 2002. Comparative growth patterns in Afrotropical giant<br />

tortoises (Reptilia Testudinidae). Tropical Zoology 15: 121-139.<br />

IVERSON, J. B. 1992. A revised checklist with distribution maps <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> turtles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

Privately printed, Richmond, Indiana, USA.<br />

LAMBERT, M. R. K. 1993. On growth, sexual dimorphism, and <strong>the</strong> general ecology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

African spurred tortoise, Geochelone sulcata, in Mali. Chelonian Conservation<br />

and Biology 1: 37-46.<br />

LAMBERT, M. R. K. 1995. On geographical size variation, growth and sexual dimor- phism<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leopard tortoise, Geochelone pardalis, in Somaliland. Chelonian<br />

Conservation and Biology 1: 269-278.<br />

LAMBERT, M.R.K. 1999. On conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sahelian giant tortoise, Geochelone sulcata,<br />

pp. 255-261. In: Miaud, C. & Guyetant, R. (eds.). Current studies in herpetology,<br />

Le Bourget de Lac (<strong>SEH</strong>) [Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 9th Ordinary General<br />

Meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Societas Europaea Herpetologica, 25-29 August 1998, Le Bourget<br />

du Lac, France]. <strong>SEH</strong>, Le Bourget du Lac, France: 255-261.<br />

LAMBERT, M. R. K., CAMPBELL, K. L. I. & KABIGUMILA ,J. D. 1998. On growth and morphometrics<br />

<strong>of</strong> leopard tortoises, Geochelone pardalis, in Serengeti National Park,<br />

Tanzania, with observations on effects <strong>of</strong> bushfires and latitudinal varia- tion in<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> eastern Africa. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3: 46-57.


JOVANOVIC, 9URIC & AAARKOVIC BJOta 3/1-2, 2002 67<br />

Tertiary reptiles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Balkan peninsula<br />

Miodrag JOVANOVIC, Dragana DURIC &<br />

Zoran AAARKOVIC<br />

Natural History Museum, Njegoseva 51, 11 000 Beograd, Yugoslavia<br />

E-mail: geopal@ptt.yu<br />

Abstract<br />

This paper includes a list, with short remarks, <strong>of</strong> all fossils <strong>of</strong> Tertiary reptiles discovered<br />

in <strong>the</strong> period 1896-2001 in <strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Balkan Peninsula, composed <strong>of</strong><br />

Serbia, Republic <strong>of</strong> Srpska and FRY Macedonia. The total number <strong>of</strong> discovered Tertiary<br />

reptile fossils in <strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Balkan Peninsula is about 55 taxons in 22 localities.<br />

First recordings are noted for chelonians <strong>of</strong> family Chelidrydae, lizards <strong>of</strong> genus<br />

Ophisaurus and family Gerhonotidae, Mediterranean snakes <strong>of</strong> family Colubridae, large<br />

subtropic snakes <strong>of</strong> genus Vipera, and certain crocodilians.<br />

Key words: Tertiary, chelonians, lizards, snakes, crocodilians, Serbia, Republic <strong>of</strong> Srpska,<br />

Macedonia.<br />

Received 9 January 2002; accepted 15 July 2002


68 3/1-2, 2002 JOVANOVIC, BURIC & MARKOVIC<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

A first, but incomplete, list <strong>of</strong> Tertiary<br />

reptiles discovered on <strong>the</strong> territory <strong>of</strong> former<br />

SFR Yugoslavia (whose eastern half<br />

we here present under <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Balkan Peninsula),<br />

was published by Paunovic (1983). From<br />

1983 to <strong>the</strong> present (2001), our knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tertiary reptiles in this part <strong>of</strong><br />

Europe has become both significantly<br />

different and larger. Within <strong>the</strong> period<br />

1985-2001, Jovanovic, <strong>the</strong> curator <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Natural History Museum and a biologist,<br />

has surveyed all older accessible<br />

paleoherpetological material from <strong>the</strong><br />

collections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Natural History<br />

Museum in Belgrade and o<strong>the</strong>r institutions<br />

in Serbia. These results were published<br />

in several papers (Jovanovic 1989,<br />

1990, 1995a, b). From 1990-1999,<br />

Markovic, a geologist and curator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Natural History Museum, discovered by<br />

fieldwork a whole array <strong>of</strong> new localities<br />

with remains <strong>of</strong> Tertiary reptiles. Since<br />

1999, Jovanovic and Markovic have<br />

been joined in paleoherpetological<br />

research by Novakovic, a biologist and<br />

curator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Natural History Museum,<br />

who initiated revision <strong>of</strong> all former findings.<br />

This work has resulted in this, <strong>the</strong><br />

most complete list <strong>of</strong> all fossil finds <strong>of</strong><br />

Tertiary reptiles in <strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Balkan Peninsula.<br />

METHODS<br />

The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper have revised<br />

older available fossil material and preliminarily<br />

identified new fossil material.<br />

They also provide comments on previous<br />

identifications and reasons behind new<br />

determinations, wherever necessary. In<br />

cases when cited fossil specimens are<br />

known only from literature data, <strong>the</strong><br />

authors did no revision but gave <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

opinion in comments. This is explicitly<br />

stated for all such fossil remains and<br />

those which are known only from credible<br />

oral reports.<br />

Many fossils cited in this paper could not<br />

be determined to species level but only<br />

to genus, family or some higher taxonomy<br />

units. However, regardless <strong>of</strong> this<br />

fact, all <strong>the</strong>se remains were treated as<br />

real species, in both a biological and a<br />

paleontological sense. For <strong>the</strong> specimens<br />

that are presently kept in <strong>the</strong><br />

Paleontological collection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural<br />

history Museum in Belgrade, that was<br />

not explicitly stated since it was understood.<br />

All material was found toge<strong>the</strong>r with<br />

mammal fossils, and <strong>the</strong>refore is dated<br />

according to MN zones (Steininger<br />

1999).<br />

LIST OF LOCALITIES AND RECORDED<br />

SPECIES<br />

EOCENE<br />

Stip (FRY Macedonia):<br />

In this locality, an almost complete shell<br />

<strong>of</strong> a turtle (Temnoclemmys mazedonica<br />

Pasic & Klincarski 1959) was found. This<br />

fossil may be part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> palentological<br />

collection in <strong>the</strong> Skopje Museum <strong>of</strong><br />

Natural History. This is not only <strong>the</strong> oldest<br />

known record <strong>of</strong> turtles in<br />

Macedonia, but also <strong>the</strong> oldest known<br />

record <strong>of</strong> any Tertiary reptile on <strong>the</strong> territory<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central Balkans.<br />

EARLY MIOCENE<br />

Djacki potok. Aleksinac (Serbia) MN1:<br />

Several almost complete turtle shells<br />

were found in vicinity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Aleksinac<br />

coal mine (Stevanovic 1969). It is not<br />

known where <strong>the</strong>se fossils are kept<br />

today.<br />

Kraljevo village. Aleksinac (Serbia) MN1:<br />

Three vertebrae, approximately five cm<br />

long (Crocodilia gen. et sp. indet), were<br />

collected by R. Stevanovic.<br />

Dubrava coal mine. Aleksinac (Serbia)<br />

MN1:<br />

According to Stevanovic (1969), at<br />

Djacki Potok and in <strong>the</strong> Dubrava coal


JOVANOVIC, BURl£ & MARKOVIC Biota 3/1-2,2002 69<br />

Table 1. List <strong>of</strong> Tertiary fossils with <strong>the</strong>ir localities and ages in MN zones (for explanation<br />

see text)<br />

fossil<br />

Testudines gen. et sp. indet<br />

Temnoclemmys mazedoniaca<br />

Trionyx sp.<br />

Emys sp.<br />

Mauremmvs serbica<br />

Testudo sp.<br />

Testudo kalksburgensis<br />

Geomyda sp.<br />

Testudinidae gen. et sp. indet<br />

Chelidridae gen. et sp. indet.<br />

Reptilia gen.et sp. indet.<br />

Crocodylia gen.et sp. inded.<br />

Crocodylus mormiensis<br />

Aligarotinae gen.et sp. indet<br />

Tomistoma egsenburgensis<br />

Sauna geaet sp. indet.<br />

Squamata gen.et sp. indet<br />

Vipera sp.<br />

Vijjeridae gen.et sp. indet.<br />

Colubridae gen.et sp. indet<br />

Alethinophidia gen.et sp. indet<br />

Natrix cf. natrix<br />

Natrix sp.<br />

Coluber cf. viridiflaviis<br />

Coluber cfgemonensis<br />

Elaphe cf.aitatorlineata<br />

Elaphe cf. longissima<br />

Elaphe sp.<br />

Chameleontidae gen.et sp. indet<br />

Anguidae gen.et sp. indet<br />

Lacertidae gen.et sp. iadet.<br />

Lacerta sp.<br />

Anguis sp.<br />

Pseudapits sp.<br />

Ophisaums sp.<br />

?Gerrhonotinac gen.et sp. indet<br />

E<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

MW<br />

2,3<br />

4<br />

i<br />

1<br />

1 3,19<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1 5<br />

1<br />

MM4<br />

List <strong>of</strong> localities:<br />

1 - Stip, (FRY Macedonia)<br />

2 - Djacki potok, Aleksinac (Serbia)<br />

3 - Okno Dubrava, Aleksinac (Serbia)<br />

4 - Bogovina (Serbia)<br />

5 - Ugljevik (Republik <strong>of</strong> Srpska)<br />

6 - Jankova Klisura (Serbia)<br />

7 - Sibnica (Serbia)<br />

8 - Milicevo brdo, Krusevica (Serbia)<br />

9 - Jama AAorava (Serbia)<br />

10 - Popovac (Serbia)<br />

11 - Prebreza, Blace (Serbia)<br />

12 - Lazarevac, Trstenik (Serbia)<br />

mine several well preserved turtle<br />

(Testudines) shells were found, with horn<br />

plates and visible markings. Besides <strong>the</strong><br />

shells, specimens also included preserved<br />

limbs. Shell lengths were about 20 cm. It<br />

6<br />

7<br />

7<br />

7<br />

MN5<br />

9<br />

3<br />

9<br />

20<br />

mammal zones<br />

MN<br />

MN6<br />

7+8<br />

21<br />

11,13<br />

13<br />

10<br />

13<br />

10<br />

11<br />

11,12<br />

10,21<br />

10<br />

10 1<br />

10<br />

1<br />

22<br />

14<br />

14<br />

14<br />

14<br />

14<br />

14<br />

MN<br />

mn<br />

15<br />

IS<br />

IS<br />

15<br />

15<br />

MN13 MN14<br />

16<br />

1<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

17<br />

MN16<br />

13 - Lestane (Serbia)<br />

14 - Vracevic, Monastery Bogovadje<br />

(Serbia)<br />

15 - Beluska and Prevalac, Veles<br />

(FRY Macedonia)<br />

16 - Grocka (Serbia)<br />

17 - Kamenjak, Bukulja (Serbia)<br />

18 - Beocin (Serbia)<br />

19 - Village Kraljevo, Aleksinac<br />

(Serbia)<br />

20 - Mala Miliva, Despotovac (Serbia)<br />

21 - Zitni potok, Prokuplje (Serbia)<br />

22 - Village Crvca, Levac (Serbia)<br />

is not known where <strong>the</strong> specimens are<br />

kept today. At <strong>the</strong> same locality limb<br />

bones <strong>of</strong> crocodilians (Crocodylia gen. et<br />

sp. indet) as well as parts <strong>of</strong> joints and<br />

one vertebra were found (Stevanovic P.<br />

IS


70 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 JOVANOVIC, BURIC & MARKOVIC<br />

viva voce, Stevanovic 1969).<br />

Bogovina (Serbia) MN1:<br />

Parts <strong>of</strong> a turtle (Trionyx sp.) shell were<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> Bogovina coal mine<br />

(Laskarev 1949). It is not known where<br />

<strong>the</strong> specimens are kept today.<br />

Ugljevik (Republic <strong>of</strong> Srpska) MN1:<br />

Lignite layers in this Neogene lake in<br />

Dinarides have originated in equivalents<br />

<strong>of</strong> ottnangian (Vujnovic et al 2000). The<br />

bottom <strong>of</strong> Ugljevik lake was gently<br />

descending during <strong>the</strong> accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />

coal, and its water was, at least in one<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period, free-flowing (Krstic<br />

2000). Fauna <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lake and its shores<br />

was, according to our findings, abundant<br />

in amphibians, birds and mammals that<br />

were subtropical or tropical in character.<br />

Of paleoherpet<strong>of</strong>auna, remains <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

lower jaw <strong>of</strong> a lizard were found. The<br />

teeth resemble those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus<br />

Anguis or Ophisaurus.<br />

Jankova Klisura (Serbia) MN4:<br />

Osteoderms <strong>of</strong> crocodilians (Crocodylia<br />

gen. et sp. indet) were found in a coal<br />

mine (Pavlovic & Djurkovic 1962). It is<br />

not known where <strong>the</strong> specimens are kept<br />

today.<br />

Sibnica (Serbia) MN4:<br />

This locality has been known since 1967<br />

(Petronijevic 1967). Of <strong>the</strong> fossils found,<br />

several were identified: fragments <strong>of</strong><br />

intermaxillar bones and vertebras <strong>of</strong><br />

some lizards (Sauria gen. et sp. indet.), a<br />

fragment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower jaw <strong>of</strong> a<br />

chameleon (Chamaeleontidae gen. et sp.<br />

indet), and a thoracic vertebra <strong>of</strong> a snake<br />

(Vipera sp.).<br />

MIDDLE MIOCENE<br />

Milicevo brdo. Krusevica (Serbia) MN5:<br />

In this locality, part <strong>of</strong> a tortoise (Testudo<br />

sp.) shell was found (Laskarev, 1936). It<br />

is not known where <strong>the</strong> specimen is kept<br />

today. This fragment <strong>of</strong> a Testudo is not<br />

only <strong>the</strong> first find <strong>of</strong> this tortoise in our<br />

region but also <strong>the</strong> first registered find <strong>of</strong><br />

any Tertiary reptile in Serbia.<br />

Jama Morava. Despotovac (Serbia)<br />

MN5:<br />

There are literature data from this locality<br />

(Petronijevic 1967), recorded as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> a turtle shell (Testudines) and a tooth<br />

<strong>of</strong> a small reptile. These fossil remains are<br />

presently kept at <strong>the</strong> Geology faculty. As<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is nei<strong>the</strong>r picture not description,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> place where <strong>the</strong> specimens are<br />

kept is unknown, any kind <strong>of</strong> revision is<br />

impossible.<br />

Mala Miliva. Despotovac (Serbia) MN5:<br />

Fossil osteoderms were found belonging<br />

to certain Anguidae.<br />

Zitni Potok. Macina. Prokuplje (Serbia)<br />

MN6:<br />

In this locality plastron fragments<br />

(Testudines gen. et sp. indet) and a tooth<br />

<strong>of</strong> a crocodilian (Crocodilia) were found<br />

at a depth <strong>of</strong> 11m in <strong>the</strong> sandy-gravel<br />

sediments.<br />

Popovac (Serbia) MN6:<br />

Several fossils <strong>of</strong> various reptiles were<br />

found in a cement marl mine in Popovac.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong>m, turtle remains are <strong>the</strong><br />

most important, and include plastron<br />

fragments <strong>of</strong> Mauremmys serbica<br />

Jovanovic, 1995b and carapace fragments<br />

<strong>of</strong> a tortoise (family Testudinidae).<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong> most important findings in<br />

reptile pale<strong>of</strong>auna in <strong>the</strong> territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

central Balkans are crocodilian remains:<br />

Tomistoma eggenburgensis Toula & Kail<br />

1885, part <strong>of</strong> a jaw with teeth (Pejovic<br />

1951). It is not known where <strong>the</strong> specimen<br />

is kept today. The fossil fragment <strong>of</strong><br />

crocodilian jaw that was identified by<br />

Pejovic through odontological analysis<br />

could not be located by <strong>the</strong> authors <strong>of</strong><br />

this paper, so revision could not be done.<br />

There is a possibility that identification<br />

done by Pejovic is inadequate, as according<br />

to Antunes (1987) and Antunes &<br />

Ginsburg (1989), fossil species <strong>of</strong> genus<br />

Tomistoma can hardly be determined<br />

just by teeth.<br />

Crocodylus moraviensis Jovanovic 1995a<br />

part <strong>of</strong> a skull with jaws. The holotype is<br />

kept at <strong>the</strong> local Museum in Paracin.


I<br />

JOVANOVld, DURIC & MARKOVIC 3/1-2, 2OO2 71<br />

Crocodylidae gen. et sp. indet, several<br />

fragments <strong>of</strong> skull bones, teeth, osteoderms,<br />

etc. (Jovanovic 1989),<br />

Crocodylus sp indet, fragment <strong>of</strong> premaxilla<br />

and nasal bones with preserved<br />

nasal opening. This fossil is presently<br />

kept at <strong>the</strong> Museum in Paracin. As this<br />

fragment shows a very convex rostrum,<br />

it may be assumed that it belonged to<br />

some crocodilian with long jaws, perhaps<br />

a gavial.<br />

Aligatorinae indet, fragments <strong>of</strong> upper<br />

and lower jaw with teeth (Jovanovic,<br />

1995a). The fossil is presently kept in <strong>the</strong><br />

Museum in Paracin. The size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> angle<br />

between <strong>the</strong> left and right branches <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> jaws enables us to conclude that this<br />

fossil remain belonged to a crocodilian<br />

with wide and short jaws, such as an alligator.<br />

Prebreza. vicinity <strong>of</strong> Blace (Serbia) MN6:<br />

Vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> locality where reptiles<br />

lived was <strong>of</strong> savannah type. Precipitation<br />

was likely to be rare and sporadic. Also<br />

sporadic were savannah bushfires that<br />

drove animals into lakes where <strong>the</strong>y<br />

drowned and later fossilized (Milosevic<br />

1967).<br />

Turtle remains from genus Trionyx sp<br />

were identified. These were carapax<br />

fragments belonging to one small and<br />

one large turtle. They differ from each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r not only in size but also by morphology<br />

<strong>of</strong> costalia (bone shape and<br />

sculptured look <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir upper surfaces).<br />

Besides, <strong>the</strong>se two bones were found in<br />

two differently coloured and differently<br />

granulated sandstone fragments. This<br />

points ei<strong>the</strong>r to possible paleoecological<br />

differences in habitats <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se turtles (if<br />

<strong>the</strong> places where both specimens were<br />

found were primary ones) or to <strong>the</strong> existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> some greater time distance<br />

between <strong>the</strong>m. Because <strong>of</strong> morphological<br />

and most probably paleoecological<br />

differences, we have decided to treat<br />

<strong>the</strong>se remains as two different species.<br />

Also in this locality, remains were found<br />

<strong>of</strong> two plastrons <strong>of</strong> certain larger, most<br />

probably aquatic turtles that are presently<br />

kept at <strong>the</strong> paleontological collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Natural History Museum in<br />

Belgrade. The size, shape and morphology<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se plastrons are similar to those<br />

<strong>of</strong> turtles in <strong>the</strong> Chelidridae family.<br />

Turtle remains (plastron fragments, hand<br />

and fossilized eggs) described in <strong>the</strong><br />

paper by Milosevic (1967) were determined<br />

to <strong>the</strong> order level (Testudines);<br />

however, <strong>the</strong>re is some doubt regarding<br />

Milosevic's taxonomic determination.<br />

The plastron fragments were lost and<br />

revision is impossible, while morphoanatomic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fossil hand<br />

remains (number <strong>of</strong> phalangae in <strong>the</strong> fingers<br />

and size) show that it probably does<br />

not belong to a chelonian. The »turtle<br />

eggs« as <strong>the</strong>y are called by Milosevic<br />

(1967) are actually only <strong>the</strong>ir moulds,<br />

almost without any traces <strong>of</strong> shell.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> revision <strong>of</strong> all fossil material<br />

brought earlier from Blace and additional<br />

sieving <strong>of</strong> sediment, bird remains were<br />

discovered. Egg size and distribution<br />

within <strong>the</strong> sediment have repeatedly<br />

reminded <strong>the</strong> authors <strong>of</strong> bird eggs within<br />

a nest. As bird remains were found in<br />

<strong>the</strong> same layer at <strong>the</strong> same locality, it is<br />

probable that <strong>the</strong> »turtle eggs« from<br />

Blace are actually a nest <strong>of</strong> eggs <strong>of</strong> some<br />

Miocene water bird. The <strong>the</strong>ory that fossil<br />

eggs from Blace belong to a turtle was<br />

also doubted by Mikhailov id his paper<br />

on classification <strong>of</strong> fossil amniote eggs<br />

(Mikhailov 1991).<br />

Lazarevac. Trstenik (Serbia) MN6:<br />

Horn plates remains <strong>of</strong> a reptile and few<br />

osteoderms <strong>of</strong> undetermined Anguidae<br />

were found in <strong>the</strong> village <strong>of</strong> Lazarevac in<br />

2001. They are now kept in <strong>the</strong> Natural<br />

History Museum in Belgrade.<br />

Lestane (Serbia) MN6:<br />

In this locality fragments <strong>of</strong> three chelonian<br />

genera were found (Trionyx sp.,<br />

Testudo sp., Emys sp.). The fossil<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> turtles were found in <strong>the</strong> layer


72 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 JOVANOVIC, BURIC & MARKOVIC<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lower Sarmate, but <strong>the</strong>re is a possibility<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y were moved <strong>the</strong>re from<br />

some older, for example Badenian, sediments<br />

(Jovanovic 1998).<br />

Vracevici near Bogovadje Monastery<br />

(Serbia) MN7+8:<br />

This locality is situated at <strong>the</strong> place<br />

reached by Paratethys during <strong>the</strong> mid<br />

Miocene (Prisjazhnjuk et al 2000). The<br />

locality was ei<strong>the</strong>r a small lake or a<br />

waterhole. According to <strong>the</strong> mammal<br />

fossils also discovered here, it may be<br />

concluded that <strong>the</strong> climate was moist<br />

and warm, tropical or subtropical.<br />

Several jaw fragments from <strong>the</strong><br />

Lacertidae family were found, as well as<br />

osteoderms and skull parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Anguinae subfamily or <strong>the</strong><br />

Gerrhonotinae subfamily and <strong>the</strong> vertebrae<br />

<strong>of</strong> snakes (Colubridae and<br />

Viperidae).<br />

Village Crnca. Levac (Serbia) MN7+8:<br />

Fragments <strong>of</strong> upper and lower jaws <strong>of</strong><br />

unknown reptiles (Sauria gen. et sp.<br />

indet.) were collected in 1975 by <strong>the</strong><br />

geologist Dolic.<br />

LATE MIOCENE<br />

Beluska and Prevalec. vicinity <strong>of</strong> Veles<br />

(Macedonia) MN11-J-12:<br />

The area where <strong>the</strong> reptiles found here<br />

lived was similar to <strong>the</strong> present-day<br />

African savannah. Around <strong>the</strong> lake in <strong>the</strong><br />

valley <strong>the</strong>re was a lot <strong>of</strong> grass and bushes.<br />

Vegetation was present mostly<br />

around water basins, lakes and rivers<br />

(Pavlovic & Markovic 1990).<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> fossils found were tortoise<br />

(Testudo sp, unknown where <strong>the</strong> specimen<br />

is kept), lizard Lacerta sp. (Ciiric<br />

1957 also not known where it is kept), as<br />

well as <strong>the</strong> right mandible, left maxilla<br />

and osteoderms <strong>of</strong> Pseudopus sp. Fossil<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> this lizard from Veles were<br />

described for <strong>the</strong> first time in a paper by<br />

Pavlovic & Markovic (1990). In that<br />

paper, <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> material found, only <strong>the</strong><br />

osteoderms were determined to be <strong>the</strong><br />

remains <strong>of</strong> a lizard Ophisaurus panonni-<br />

cus, or as accepted here, Pseudopus<br />

panonnicus.<br />

The right mandible <strong>of</strong> a lizard from Veles<br />

seems to have been discovered by<br />

Pavlovic and Laskarev after WWI; however,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y nei<strong>the</strong>r identified it nor mentioned<br />

it in reports. During later repeated<br />

sieving <strong>of</strong> sediments, Markovic &<br />

Pavlovic discovered <strong>the</strong> left maxilla and<br />

several osteoderms. From an odontological<br />

viewpoint, <strong>the</strong> mandible and maxilla<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fossil Pseudopus sp from Veles are<br />

very similar to each o<strong>the</strong>r and probably<br />

belonged to two individuals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

species. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> jaws and<br />

teeth <strong>of</strong> Pseudopus sp from Veles differ<br />

morphologically from those <strong>of</strong> Middle<br />

European fossil Pseudopus pannonicus<br />

as well as from <strong>the</strong> recent Mediterranean<br />

Pseudopus apodus.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> same locality, fragments <strong>of</strong> one<br />

larger and one smaller snake vertebra<br />

were found. The osteological characters<br />

point out that <strong>the</strong>se are vertebra <strong>of</strong> a<br />

viper, most probably two different individuals,<br />

and trunk vertebra <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Alethinophidia. Based on collected material<br />

and reports, during <strong>the</strong> excavations<br />

in Veles, Pavlovic and Laskarev paid most<br />

attention to larger fossil remains while<br />

neglecting smaller ones. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

finding and mentioning <strong>of</strong> reptile vertebra<br />

(Reptilia gen. et sp. indet, PavlovL<br />

1922) shows that it was large, that is,<br />

belonging to a very large specimen <strong>of</strong><br />

lizard or snake. Also, two vertebra fragments<br />

were found that were unusual in<br />

shape (elongated and large, with broken<br />

ventral parts) and determined to be<br />

Reptilia gen.et sp. indet. As <strong>the</strong>re was no<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r material to compare <strong>the</strong>m with,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y could not be defined more precise-<br />

ly'<br />

Grocka (Serbia) MN13: *<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> an epiplastron was found<br />

(Geoemyda sp.) This fragment is insufficient<br />

to precisely define <strong>the</strong> turtle<br />

species.


JOVANOVIC, BURld & MARKOVIC Biota 3/1-2,2002 73<br />

EARLY PLIOCENE<br />

Kamenjak (Serbia) MM 14:<br />

This locality is very rich in various fossil<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> herpet<strong>of</strong>auna. The following<br />

items were identified: fragments <strong>of</strong> parietal<br />

bones, jaws and vertebrae <strong>of</strong> Lacerta<br />

sp., many vertebra <strong>of</strong> Anguis sp, osteoderms<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ophisaurus sp, fragments <strong>of</strong><br />

right maxilla <strong>of</strong> Anguis or Ophisaurus as<br />

well as many torsal vertebra <strong>of</strong> snakes<br />

(Natrix sp., Coluber sp., Elaphe sp.,<br />

Vipera sp.).<br />

MIDDLE PLIOCENE<br />

Beocin (Serbia) MN16:<br />

In this locality, part <strong>of</strong> a turtle shell were<br />

found and identified as Testudo kalksburgensisTou\a,<br />

1896, (Mlynarski 1966).<br />

The fossil remains <strong>of</strong> this tortoise are<br />

kept at <strong>the</strong> Geological Institute in<br />

Hungary. Testudo kalksburgensis from<br />

Beocin is <strong>the</strong> first fossil find <strong>of</strong> a turtle<br />

registered in Vojvodina.<br />

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION<br />

At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> this paper, we must mention<br />

that some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fossil remains<br />

determined here to <strong>the</strong> genus level will<br />

be fur<strong>the</strong>r described in later papers and<br />

determined to <strong>the</strong> species level. Some <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m represent new species for science.<br />

In some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earlier papers it is mentioned<br />

that almost all fossil remains <strong>of</strong><br />

reptiles in this part <strong>of</strong> Europe were found<br />

accidentally, for example, while excavating<br />

mammal fauna, and that <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

never considered very important.<br />

However, reptiles and amphibians are<br />

very good ecological indicators, that is,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are susceptible to various climatic<br />

changes (especially temperature and<br />

humidity). Better knowledge <strong>of</strong> fossil<br />

reptiles in <strong>the</strong> central Balkans would<br />

surely enable us to solve a whole array <strong>of</strong><br />

paleoecological and paleogeographic<br />

problems.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> paper "Miocene Crocodilians <strong>of</strong><br />

Serbia," read at <strong>the</strong> third symposium on<br />

fauna <strong>of</strong> Serbia (Jovanovic 1989), <strong>the</strong><br />

author shared <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> Tertiary reptiles should be<br />

looked for at <strong>the</strong> same places where<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> Tertiary mammals were<br />

found, especially on <strong>the</strong> south exposures<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> localities. During <strong>the</strong> last several<br />

years, Markovic has found remains <strong>of</strong><br />

small mammals toge<strong>the</strong>r with fossils <strong>of</strong><br />

chelonians, lizards and snakes at almost<br />

all visited Tertiary and Quaternary localities<br />

in Serbia. This preliminary research<br />

has already partially confirmed <strong>the</strong><br />

above-mentioned assumptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

authors.<br />

This list includes various species <strong>of</strong><br />

Tertiary reptiles found in various Tertiary<br />

localities in <strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Balkans. However, <strong>the</strong> realistic number<br />

<strong>of</strong> species <strong>of</strong> Tertiary reptiles that inhabited<br />

this part <strong>of</strong> Europe was certainly tens<br />

<strong>of</strong> times larger than those we have mentioned<br />

(Jovanovic 1996 a, b, 1998).<br />

Unfortunately, here we must repeat and<br />

stress that only future, systematic paleoherpetological<br />

research in <strong>the</strong> central<br />

Balkans can give a realistic picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Tertiary reptiles <strong>of</strong> this region.


74 Biota 3/1-2, 2002 JOVANOVld, 0UR|£ & MARKOVlC<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The authors <strong>of</strong> this paper are especially grateful to our colleagues, mineralogist Voislav<br />

Simic and geologist Gordana Jovanovic, for shared data, suggestions, and advice.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANTUNES, M.T. 1987: Affinities and Taxinomical Status <strong>of</strong> Miocene Longirostrine<br />

Crocodilians from Western Europe with Remarks on Phylogeny, Paleoecology and<br />

Distribution. Comun. Serv. Geol. Portugal 73: 49-58.<br />

ANTUNES, M.T. & GINSBURG, L. 1989: Les Crocodiliens des faluns miocenes de I'Anjou.<br />

Bull.Mus.natn.Hist.nat. 4 C: 2: 79-99.<br />

ClRlC, A. 1957: Pikermijska fauna iz okoline Titovog Velesa. Glas. prir. muz. srp. zeml je, A<br />

8: 1-82. In Serbian.<br />

JOVANOVIC, G. 1998: Prilog poznavanju sarmata Lestana kod Beograda. Vesnik geozavoda,<br />

serija A,B, Geologija, 48: 69-73rln Serbian.<br />

JOVANOVIC, M. 1989: Krokodili miocena Srbije. Treci simpozijum o fauni SR.Srbije. Uvodni<br />

referati i rezimei, 58. In Serbian.<br />

JOVANOVIC, M. 1990: Tercijarni gmizavci Srbije: sadasnje stanje i buduca istrazivan ja. XII<br />

kongres na geolozite na Jugoslavia. 1: 348-358. In Serbian.<br />

JOVANOVIC, M. 1995 a: Crocodylus moraviensis, nova vrsta tercijarnog krokodila iz laporaca<br />

Popovca kod Paracina (Serbia, Jugoslavia). Zapisnici SGD za 1990. i 1991.<br />

37-38. In Serbian.<br />

JOVANOVIc, M. 1995 b: Mauremys serbica nova vrsta slatkovodne kornjace iz tercijara<br />

Popovca kod Paracina (Serbia, Jugoslavija). Zapisnici SGD za 1990 i 1991. 39- 43.<br />

In Serbian.<br />

JOVANOVIC, M. 1996 a: Fossil reptilia from <strong>the</strong> Popovac quare. Neogene <strong>of</strong> Central Serbia.<br />

Neogene <strong>of</strong> Paratethys Yugoslav Working Group. JGCP, Project 329: 47.<br />

JOVANOVIC, M. 1996 b: O diverzitetu i sudbini tercijarnih vodozemaca i gmizavaca centralnog<br />

dela Balkanskog kopna. Desbilten, 2. 26-28. In Serbian.<br />

JOVANOVIC, M. 1998: Majdan cementnih laporaca Popovca (Paracin, Serbia) - jedno od<br />

najvaznijih nalazista miocenskih krokodila u Evropi. Zastita prirode 48-49, za<br />

1995-1997: 351-353. In Serbian.<br />

KRSTlC, N. 2000: Some ostracodes from <strong>the</strong> Dinaric Alps neogene and its paleoecolo gy.<br />

Zbornik radova Medunarodnog simpozijuma geologija i metalogenija Dinarida i<br />

Vardarske zone. ANU Republike Srpske. 1: 207-214. Banja Luka, Srpsko Sarajevo.<br />

In Serbian.<br />

LASKAREV, V. 1936: Miocenska fauna kicmenjaka iz okoline sela Krusevice (Bukulja). Geol.<br />

anali Balk.pol. 13: 14-27. In Serbian.<br />

LASKAREV, V. 1949: O novim nalascima fosilnih sisara kod Despotovca sa kratkim pre gledom<br />

tercijarnih fauna sisara nadenih u Srbiji. Glas.SANU, 192: 45-62. In Serbian.<br />

MIKHAILOV, K. E. 1991: Classification <strong>of</strong> fossil eggshells <strong>of</strong> amniotic vertebrata. Acta<br />

Paleontologica Polonica 36: 193-238.<br />

MILOSEVIC, V. 1967: O nalasku fosilnih jaja u miocenskim sedimentima okoline Blaca u<br />

Toplici. Glas.Prir.Muzeja A, 22: 17-28. In Serbian.<br />

MLYNARSKI, M. 1966: Die fosilen Schildkroten in den ungarishen Samlungen. Acta Zool.<br />

Cracov. 11:223-288<br />

PAUNOVlC, M. 1983: Prilog poznavanju rasprostranjenosti mezozojskih i kenozojskih<br />

Amphibia i Reptilia u Jugoslaviji. Geol.vjesnik, 36: 79-89. In Croatian.<br />

PAVLOVlC, G. & MARKOVlC, Z. 1990: Dopuna poznavanju pikermiske faune iz oko line<br />

Titovog Velesa na osnovu novih nalazaka sitnih kicmenjaka. XII Kongres geologa<br />

Jugoslavije. 1: 401-405. Ohrid. In Serbian.<br />

PAVLOVlC, M. & BURKOVlC, R. 1962: Miocenski sisari iz rudnika "Jankova Klisura" u


JOVANOVld, 9URIC & MARKOVIC BJOta 3/i-a, 2002 75<br />

Toplickom basenu (Serbia). Geol.anali Balk.pol., 29. In Serbian.<br />

PAVLOVlC P 1922: Muzej srpske zemlje u 1921. g., Godisnjak SKA, 30: 1-23. In Serbian.<br />

PASlC, M. & KLINCARSKI, V. 1959: Nalazak fosilne kornjace u sedimentima gornjeg eocena<br />

okoline Stipa (Makedonija). Vesnik 27: 61-72. In Serbian.<br />

PEJOVlC D. 1951: O nalasku vilice fosilnog krokodila u cementnim laporcima Popovca kod<br />

Paracina. Zbornik radova SAND, 16: 103-107. In Serbian.<br />

PETRONIJEVIC Z. 1967: Srednjomiocenska i donjosarmatska ("Stajerska") fauna sisara<br />

Srbije. Paleontologica jugoslavica, 7: 1-157. In Serbian.<br />

PRYSJAZHNJUK, V, KOVALENKO, V. & KRSTlC N. 2000: On <strong>the</strong> terrestrial and fresh- water<br />

molluscs from neogene <strong>of</strong> western Serbia. Zbornik radova Medunaro dnog simpozijuma<br />

geologija i metalogenija Dinarida i Vardarske zone. AND Republike<br />

Srpske 1: 219-224. Banja Luka, Srpsko Sarajevo. In Serbian.<br />

STEININGER, F. F. 1999: Chronostratigraphy, Geochronology and Biochronology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Miocene "European Land Mammal Mega-Zones" (ELMMZ)and <strong>the</strong> Miocene<br />

"Mammal-Zones (MN-Zones)". In: Roessner G. & Heissig K. (eds.): The Miocene<br />

Mammals <strong>of</strong> Europe. 9-24. F. Pfeil, Munchen.<br />

STEVANOVIC, R. 1969: Stratigrafski prikaz miocenske ugljonosne serije aleksinackog basena.<br />

Zapisnici SGD, (1964., 1965., 1966. i 1967.). 239-247. In Serbian.<br />

VUJNOVIC, L. et al. 2000: Lacustrine neogene <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>'-Dinarides. Zbornik radova Medunarodnog<br />

simpozijuma geologija i metalogenija Dinarida i Vardarske zone. AND<br />

Republike Srpske, 1: 197-206. Banja Luka, Srpsko Sarajevo. In Serbian.


Biota 3/1-2,2002 77<br />

Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna <strong>of</strong> Round Island,<br />

Mauritius<br />

Zoltan KORSOS1 & Balazs TROCSANYI2<br />

'Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13, H-1088<br />

Budapest, Hungary<br />

E-mail: korsos@zoo.zoo.nhmus.hu<br />

department <strong>of</strong> Conservation, Danube-Drava National Park Directorate, Tettye ter 9,<br />

H-7625 Pecs, Hungary<br />

E-mail:balazs.trocsanyi@ktm.x400gw.itb.hu<br />

Abstract<br />

Round Island, north <strong>of</strong> Mauritius in <strong>the</strong> Indian Ocean, is inhabited by eight species <strong>of</strong><br />

reptiles (no amphibians), five <strong>of</strong> which are endemic. The original vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

island was clear-cut in <strong>the</strong> 18th century. Introduced goats and rabbits were eliminated<br />

relatively recently to protect <strong>the</strong> remnants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> palm savannah, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> whole island<br />

was designated as a nature reserve. A Hungarian team visited <strong>the</strong> island in November<br />

1999 and April 2001, to carry out herpet<strong>of</strong>aunal assessments related to all eight species.<br />

Whereas no specimen <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Burrowing Boa was encountered, good populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Telfair's and Bojer's Skinks, as well as <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ornate Day Gecko, could be estimated.<br />

Several specimens <strong>of</strong> DurrelPs Night Gecko, <strong>the</strong> Keel-scaled Tree Boa, and 33 specimens<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gun<strong>the</strong>r's Gecko were observed.<br />

Key words: Round Island, Mauritius, herpet<strong>of</strong>auna, endemic reptiles, conservation<br />

Received 26 February 2002; accepted 27 July 2002


78 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 KORSOS & TROCSANYI<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The tiny, volcanic Round Island with its<br />

151 hectares lies 20 km to <strong>the</strong> north <strong>of</strong><br />

Mauritius in <strong>the</strong> Indian Ocean. It is<br />

inhabited by eight species <strong>of</strong> reptiles (no<br />

amphibians), five <strong>of</strong> which are endemic,<br />

occurring nowhere else in <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

The original vegetation, hardwood<br />

ebony and teak forests, was clear-cut in<br />

<strong>the</strong> 18th century. Introduced goats and<br />

rabbits were eliminated relatively recently<br />

(in 1979 and 1986, respectively) to<br />

protect <strong>the</strong> remnants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> palm savannah,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> whole island was designated<br />

as a nature reserve with extremely<br />

limited access for scientific research only.<br />

In 1989, a conservation management<br />

plan was set up for <strong>the</strong> island to restore<br />

its vegetation, to control <strong>the</strong> invasion <strong>of</strong><br />

alien species, and to monitor <strong>the</strong> population<br />

changes <strong>of</strong> its native and endemic<br />

flora and fauna.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to summarize in<br />

brief <strong>the</strong> information presently available<br />

on <strong>the</strong> remarkable herpet<strong>of</strong>auna <strong>of</strong><br />

Round Island, to give an illustrative list <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> eight known reptile species, and to<br />

provide a comprehensive literature<br />

(without references) to initiate fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

herpetological studies. The scientific<br />

results <strong>of</strong> our expeditions will be published<br />

elsewhere.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

With <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local authorities, <strong>the</strong><br />

National Parks and Conservation Service<br />

(NPCS) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />

Food, Technology & Natural Resources,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Mauritian Wildlife Fund (MWF),<br />

a Hungarian team visited <strong>the</strong> island in<br />

November 1999, and later, with <strong>the</strong> support<br />

<strong>of</strong> Fauna and Flora International, in<br />

April 2001. Five and ten days were spent<br />

on Round Island, respectively, <strong>the</strong> necessary<br />

material being carried over by governmental<br />

helicopters, following <strong>the</strong><br />

strict expedition protocol set up previously<br />

by NPCS and MWF. There is no<br />

permanent research station on <strong>the</strong> island<br />

at present, so expedition members have<br />

to bring everything <strong>the</strong>mselves (incl.<br />

food, fresh water, tents, sleeping bags,<br />

etc.), and, similarly, have to remove all<br />

waste material when leaving <strong>the</strong> island.<br />

Usually <strong>the</strong>re are four management<br />

expeditions organized by NPCS every<br />

year, with <strong>the</strong> main purpose being to<br />

monitor plant reintroduction and vegetation<br />

recovery.<br />

Surveys and censuses <strong>of</strong> herpet<strong>of</strong>auna<br />

were made every <strong>full</strong> day during <strong>the</strong><br />

early morning, late afternoon and<br />

evening hours; midday was left out<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extremely hot period<br />

when all reptiles appeared to rest.<br />

Gun<strong>the</strong>r's geckos were caught and<br />

measured on all occasions if possible; <strong>the</strong><br />

same applied for Casarea dussumieri,<br />

whereas o<strong>the</strong>r geckos and skinks<br />

observed were only noted during <strong>the</strong><br />

census. In <strong>the</strong> second visit to <strong>the</strong> island,<br />

special methods were used to rediscover<br />

Bolyeria multocarinata; <strong>the</strong> results will be<br />

discussed in ano<strong>the</strong>r paper.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Round Island reptiles include three geckos<br />

(Gekkonidae), three skinks<br />

(Scincidae), and two snake species (<strong>the</strong><br />

only known members) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family<br />

Bolyeriidae, according to <strong>the</strong> following<br />

list (endemic forms are marked by an<br />

asterisk):<br />

Gekkonidae:<br />

Gun<strong>the</strong>r's Gecko Phelsuma guen<strong>the</strong>ri<br />

Boulenger, 1885*<br />

Ornate Day Gecko Phelsuma ornata<br />

Gray, 1825<br />

Durrell's Night Gecko Nactus serpensinsula<br />

durrelli Arnold & Jones, 1994*<br />

Scincidae:<br />

Telfair's Skink Leiolopisma telfairii<br />

(Desjardins, 1831)*<br />

Bojer's Skink Congylomorphus bojerii<br />

(Desjardins, 1831)<br />

Bouton's Skink Cryptoblepharus boutonii


KORSOS & TR6CSANYI BJOta Ti-a. 2002 79<br />

(Desjardins, 1831)<br />

Bolyeriidae:<br />

Keel-scaled Tree Boa Casarea dussumieri<br />

(Schlegel, 1837)*<br />

Burrowing Boa Bolyeria multocarinata<br />

(Boie, 1827)*<br />

Whereas no specimen <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Burrowing<br />

Boa was encountered (<strong>the</strong> last observation<br />

<strong>of</strong> this species dates back to 1974)<br />

during our two expeditions, relatively<br />

good populations <strong>of</strong> Telfair's and Bojer's<br />

Skinks, as well as <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ornate Day<br />

Gecko could be estimated. Several specimens<br />

<strong>of</strong> Durrell's Night Gecko, <strong>the</strong> Keelscaled<br />

Tree Boa, and 33 specimens <strong>of</strong><br />

Gun<strong>the</strong>r's Gecko - exceeding <strong>the</strong> results<br />

<strong>of</strong> all previous expeditions - were<br />

observed and measured accordingly.<br />

Bouton's Skinks, in accordance with <strong>the</strong><br />

former observations, seemed to be confined<br />

to <strong>the</strong> rocky shoreline surfaces. The<br />

Mauritian nature conservation authorities<br />

put enormous efforts into <strong>the</strong><br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> native vegetation <strong>of</strong><br />

Round Island, which could help to stabilize<br />

<strong>the</strong> different reptile populations.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> second expedition (April<br />

2001) our aim was to search for evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence or extinction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Burrowing Boa (Bolyeria multocarinata<br />

(Boie, 1827)). This animal has been<br />

seen only four times in <strong>the</strong> 20th century,<br />

and since its last observation in 1974 no<br />

signs <strong>of</strong> its survival have been discovered.<br />

Because our searches, too, were<br />

unsuccessful in this respect, we consider<br />

this snake species to be extinct.<br />

In our detailed reports (available through<br />

<strong>the</strong> National Parks and Conservation<br />

Service, Reduit, Mauritius) conclusions<br />

were drawn about <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />

possible threats to <strong>the</strong> unique herpet<strong>of</strong>aunal<br />

assemblage <strong>of</strong> Round Island. We<br />

also proposed to <strong>the</strong> Mauritian nature<br />

conservation authorities to organize<br />

more regular and standardized surveys<br />

to follow <strong>the</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> different<br />

reptile populations.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We would like to extend our sincere thanks to <strong>the</strong> following persons for <strong>the</strong>ir assistance<br />

during our visit to <strong>the</strong> island: Youssef Mungroo, Vishnu Bachraz, Krishna Puttoo,<br />

Shyamduth Ramrekha, Vishal Nundlaul (all from <strong>the</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Food,<br />

Technology & Natural Resources, National Parks and Conservation Service, Reduit,<br />

Mauritius), Carl Jones and Ashok Khadun (Mauritian Wildlife Appeal Fund, Port Louis,<br />

Mauritius). Our travel could not have been accomplished without <strong>the</strong> financial help <strong>of</strong><br />

Comp Travel Ltd. (Budapest, Hungary), <strong>the</strong> Fauna & Flora International (Great Britain),<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Mauritius Travel & Tourist Bureau Ltd. (Floreal, Mauritius). Special thanks are<br />

due to our wives, Zita Zachar & Agnes Varga, for helping and encouraging us in <strong>the</strong> field<br />

(as well as before and after <strong>the</strong> expedition).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ARNOLD, E. N. 1980: Recently extinct reptile populations from Mauritius and Reunion,<br />

Indian Ocean. Journal <strong>of</strong> Zoology, London 191: 33-47.<br />

ARNOLD, E. N. & JONES, C. G. 1994: The night geckos <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus Nactus in <strong>the</strong><br />

Mascarene islands with a description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distinctive population on Round<br />

Island. Dodo, Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust 30: 119-131.<br />

BLOXAM, Q. & VOKINS, M. 1978: Breeding and maintenance <strong>of</strong> Phelsuma guen<strong>the</strong>ri<br />

(Boulenger, 1985) at <strong>the</strong> Jersey Zoological Park. Dodo, Jersey Wildlife<br />

Preservation Trusts 15: 82-91.<br />

BULLOCK, D. J. 1977: Round Island - A tale <strong>of</strong> destruction. Oryx 14: 51-58.<br />

BULLOCK, D. J. 1986: The ecology and conservation <strong>of</strong> reptiles on Round Island and


80 Biota 3/1-2,2002 KORSOS & TROCSANYI<br />

Gunner's Quoin, Mauritius. Biological Conservation 37: 135-156.<br />

BULLOCK, D. & NORTH, S. 1975: Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Edinburgh University Expedition to Round<br />

Island, Mauritius, July and August 1975. Unpublished report, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Edinburgh.<br />

BULLOCK, D. & NORTH, S. 1984: Round Island in 1982. Oryx 18: 36-41.<br />

DASZAK, P. 1994: The 1993 Raleigh International Round Island Expedition, including a survey<br />

<strong>of</strong> intestinal parasites collected from animals <strong>of</strong> Round Island, Mauritius and<br />

Rodrigues and observations on Round Island reptiles. Unpublished report,<br />

Kingston University.<br />

DULLOO, M. E., BULLOCK, D. J. & NORTH, S. 1996: Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expedition to Round<br />

Island and Gunner's Quoin, Mauritius, July/August 1996. Unpublished report,<br />

Mauritius Wildlife Foundation.<br />

GARBUTT, N. 1992: The reptiles <strong>of</strong> Round Island, Mauritius. Herptile 17: 157-170.<br />

GARBUTT, N. 1992: The reptiles <strong>of</strong> Round Island, Mauritius. Vivarium 4: 14-18, 32, 33.<br />

GARBUTT, N. 1992: The Round Island gecko: A most unusual Phelsuma. Dactylus 1: 17-21.<br />

JONES, C. G. 1988: Round Island boa eats Serpent Island gecko. Oryx 22: 180.<br />

JONES, C. G. 1993: The ecology and conservation <strong>of</strong> Mauritian skinks. Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Arts<br />

and Sciences, Mauritius 5: 71-95.<br />

JONES, C. G. & HARTLEY, J. 1995: A conservation project on Mauritius and Rodrigues: An<br />

overview and bibliography. Dodo, Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust 31: 40-65.<br />

KORS6S, Z. & TR6CSANYI, B. 2000: Report on <strong>the</strong> Hungarian Herpetological Expedition to<br />

Round Island, Mauritius, November 1999. Unpublished report, Hungarian<br />

Natural History Museum & University <strong>of</strong> Pecs.<br />

KORSOS, Z. & TROCSANYI, B. 2001: Population assessment <strong>of</strong> Gun<strong>the</strong>r's Gecko in its natural<br />

habitat, Round Island, Mauritius. 15th Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Society <strong>of</strong><br />

Conservation Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii, Hilo, USA, July 29-August 1, 2001<br />

MERTON, D. V., ATKINSON, I. A. E., STRAHM, W, JONES, C., EMPSON, R. A.,<br />

MUNGROO, Y, DULLOO, E. & LEWIS, R. 1989: A management plan for <strong>the</strong><br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> Round Island, Mauritius. Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust.<br />

NORTH, S. G. & BULLOCK, D. J. 1986: Changes in vegetation and populations <strong>of</strong> introduced<br />

mammals <strong>of</strong> Round Island and Gunner's Quoin, Mauritius. Biological<br />

Conservation 37: 99-117.<br />

NORTH, S. G., BULLOCK, D. J. & DULLOO, M. E. 1994: Changes in <strong>the</strong> vegetation and reptile<br />

populations on Round Island, Mauritius, following eradication <strong>of</strong> rabbits.<br />

Biological Conservation 67: 21-28<br />

OWADALLY, A. W. & LAMBERT, M. 1988: Herpetology in Mauritius. A history <strong>of</strong> extinction,<br />

future hope for conservation. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> British Herpetological Society 23:11-<br />

20.<br />

RAMREKHA, S. 1999: Expedition on Round Island, 17th-25th August 1999. Unpublished<br />

report, National Park and Conservation Service, Mauritius.<br />

TONGE, S. 1990: The past, present and future <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> herpet<strong>of</strong>auna <strong>of</strong> Mauritius. Bulletin <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Chicago Herpetological Society 25: 220-226.<br />

TR6CSANYI, B. 1997: The artificial environment and activity: Some aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> captive<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Round Island Gecko (Phelsuma guen<strong>the</strong>ri). Thesis, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kent & Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust.<br />

VINSON, J. 1953: Some recent data on <strong>the</strong> fauna <strong>of</strong> Round and Serpent Islands. Proceedings<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Arts and Sciences, Mauritius 1: 253-257.<br />

VINSON, J. & VINSON, J.-M. 1969: The saurian fauna <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mascarene islands. Bulletin <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Mauritius Institute 6: 203-320.<br />

VINSON, J.-M. 1975: Notes on <strong>the</strong> reptiles <strong>of</strong> Round Island. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mauritius<br />

Institute 8: 49-67.


KORSOS<br />

& TROCSANYI Bio la 31-3, 2003 81<br />

2. Palm savannah: typical<br />

vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

western part <strong>of</strong> Round<br />

Island<br />

1. Round Island from <strong>the</strong> air<br />

3. Gun<strong>the</strong>r's Gecko<br />

Pheisuma guen<strong>the</strong>ri<br />

Boulenger, 1885


82 Biota 3/1-2, 2002 KORSOS & TROCSANYI<br />

5. Ornate Day Gecko<br />

Phelsuma ornata Gray,<br />

1825<br />

- .<br />

4. Gun<strong>the</strong>r's Gecko<br />

Phelsuma guen<strong>the</strong>ri<br />

Boulenger, 1885<br />

6. Durrell's Night<br />

Gecko Nactus serpensinsula<br />

durrelli<br />

Arnold & Jones, 1994


KORSOS & TROCSANYI BJOla 3/1-2, 2002 83<br />

8. Bojer's Skink<br />

Congylomorphus<br />

bojerii (Desjardins,<br />

1831)<br />

7. Telfair's Skink<br />

Leioiopisma telfairii<br />

(Desjardins, 1831)<br />

9. Bouton's Skink<br />

Cryptoblepharus boutonii<br />

(Desjardins,<br />

1831)


84 Biota 3/1-2, 2002 KORSOS & TROCSANYI<br />

11. Keel-scaled Tree<br />

Boa Casarea dussumieri<br />

(Schle gel, 1837).<br />

Adult's head<br />

10. Burrowing Round Island Boa Bolyeria multocarinata (Bole,<br />

1827)<br />

The only museum specimen in Mauritius<br />

12. Keel-scaled Tree<br />

Boa Casarea dussumieri<br />

(Schlegel, 1837).<br />

Juvenile colouration


KUTRUP & YILMAZ Biota 3/i-a, 2002 85<br />

Preliminary data on some new<br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> Vipera barani<br />

collected from Trabzon<br />

(Nor<strong>the</strong>astern Turkey)<br />

Bilal KUTRUP1 & Nurh ay at YILMAZ2<br />

1Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Arts and Sciences, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Biology, 61080,<br />

Trabzon, Turkey<br />

E-mail: kutrup@ktu.edu.tr<br />

2Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Rize, Arts&Sciences, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Biology, 53100,<br />

Rize, Turkey<br />

E-mail: nurhayat@ktu.edu.tr<br />

Abstract<br />

This study was carried out to find viper specimens in Trabzon, situated in nor<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

Turkey. During <strong>the</strong> study period, a total <strong>of</strong> 9 viper specimens were collected from new<br />

locations in Arpaozu (Caykara), Balhca, Sugeldi (Of), and Camlik (Vakfikebir). For morphometric<br />

studies, <strong>the</strong>se specimens were examined, and for all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se specimens, 16<br />

different items <strong>of</strong> data were collected. In addition, collected data were compared with<br />

data from o<strong>the</strong>r vipers (Vipera barani and Vipera pontica) which are described from<br />

Rize, Artvin and Adapazan. Trabzon viper specimens are characterised by partial fragmentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> frontal and parietals, high ventrals and loreals, fewer subcaudals and yellow<br />

green tail tips than in Vipera barani and Vipera pontica. When comparing <strong>the</strong> subalpine<br />

population (Arpaozu) with o<strong>the</strong>r lowland ones (Of, Yomra and Vakfikebir), differences<br />

in apical and dorsal patterns could be detected. The Arpaozu population had<br />

one apical, which is normally found only in Vipera ursiniiand occasionally in <strong>the</strong> Vipera<br />

kaznakovi complex (V. kaznakovi, V. dinniki and V. darevski). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> apicals was 2 or 3 in Vipera barani and V. pontica. Also, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> zigzag<br />

bands was low in <strong>the</strong> Arpaozu specimens (48-49 instead <strong>of</strong> 62-67 in <strong>the</strong> lowland<br />

specimens). As a result, it is clearly indicated that <strong>the</strong> new viper specimens from Trabzon<br />

show some similarities in colour patterns as well as scalation characters with V. barani<br />

and V. pontica. However, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> circumoculars, loreals and crown scales is lower<br />

in our specimens than in both species. Taking into consideration <strong>the</strong> differences and<br />

similarities, <strong>the</strong> Trabzon specimens are most similar to V. barani<br />

Key words: Reptilia, Viperidae, Vipera barani, Trabzon<br />

Received 30 August; accepted 20 December 2001


86 3/1-2, 2OO2 KUTRUP & YILMAZ<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Recent studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> systematics <strong>of</strong><br />

vipers in <strong>the</strong> Caucasus have shown that<br />

<strong>the</strong> taxonomy <strong>of</strong> this group is ra<strong>the</strong>r complex.<br />

It has been reported that <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

two viper groups in this region, Vipera<br />

kaznakovi and Vipera ursinii (Vedmederja<br />

et al. 1986, Nilson et al. 1995). Vipera<br />

barani has been evaluated to be an<br />

important species in <strong>the</strong> Vipera kaznakovi<br />

group as Vipera pontica. Only Vipera<br />

kaznakovi is well defined and restricted in<br />

distribution and geographically separated<br />

from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r species in this region.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong>se species, Vipera pontica<br />

shows clear similarities with Vipera barani<br />

in having high fragmentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

frontal and parietals, in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

ventrals as well as by <strong>the</strong>ir yellow green<br />

tail (Billing et al. 1990).<br />

Initially, Vipera barani Bohme and Joger,<br />

1983, was originally described from a single<br />

specimen - a melanistic female from<br />

Sapanca (Adapazan) which is situated on<br />

<strong>the</strong> southwest coast <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Black Sea.<br />

Then, Frazen and Heckes identified and<br />

described Vipera barani from Rize<br />

(Nilson, pers. comm.). Recently Baran et<br />

al. (1997) published information about<br />

three viper specimens that <strong>the</strong>y considered<br />

as being V. pontica from<br />

Camlyhemsin (Rize). Never<strong>the</strong>less, some<br />

German herpetologists (Frazen and<br />

Heckes) believe that <strong>the</strong> Camlyhemsin<br />

population should be evaluated as V.<br />

barani<br />

The taxonomy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vipera barani and<br />

Vipera pontica has been confusing and<br />

contradictory (Hoggren et al. 1993,<br />

Nilson et al. 1994, 1995, Joger et al.<br />

1997). The original question <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> specimens belonging to <strong>the</strong> Eastern<br />

Black Sea Region (Rize and Trabzon) and<br />

those <strong>of</strong> Adapazan are identical must be<br />

answered. For this purpose, DNA<br />

sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vipers caught from<br />

Adapazan and Rize have been studied by<br />

Frazen and Heckes. There is ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

question; could it be that what we have is<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> populations within <strong>the</strong> subgenus<br />

pelias along <strong>the</strong> Anatolian Black<br />

Sea coast? The new specimens caught<br />

from Trabzon could fit into such a series.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Camlyhemsin and<br />

Adapazan specimens were evaluated as<br />

two different groups (V. barani in berus<br />

group and V. pontica in aspisfgroup) by<br />

Joger et al. (1997). They also stated that<br />

<strong>the</strong> melanistic specimens belonging to V.<br />

barani show similarities with <strong>the</strong> aspis<br />

group. Recently, <strong>the</strong>re has been a trend<br />

to evaluate both species as <strong>the</strong> same<br />

taxon.<br />

Despite intensive searching by several<br />

herpetologists, no additional Vipera<br />

barani specimen was captured.<br />

Examining more specimens belonging to<br />

Viper from new localities in Trabzon is<br />

aimed at gaining a broad perspective<br />

including colour pattern and pholidosis<br />

characteristics.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The study was conducted from April to<br />

September <strong>of</strong> 1999 and 2000, and joint<br />

field trips were made in different parts <strong>of</strong><br />

Trabzon to capture <strong>the</strong> samples <strong>of</strong> viper.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> nine specimens (5 females and<br />

4 males) were captured from four different<br />

locations. Two adult females were<br />

caught from <strong>the</strong> locality <strong>of</strong> Arpaozu, situated<br />

approximately 20 km south <strong>of</strong><br />

Uzungol (Trabzon). This habitat was separated<br />

from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs by having steep<br />

wooded mountain slopes with many big,<br />

rocky outcrops at high altitudes (more<br />

than 2000m).<br />

The o<strong>the</strong>r specimens were caught in <strong>the</strong><br />

lowland Black Sea coast locations <strong>of</strong><br />

Ballica, Sulgeldi (Of), Cinarh (Yomra) and<br />

Camhk (Vakfikebir). One adult male was<br />

captured from Ballica, situated approximately<br />

63 km east <strong>of</strong> Trabzon and ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

adult male was encountered in Sugeldi,<br />

situated 5 km to <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong><br />

Ballica. One adult female was caught in


KUTRUP & YILMAZ 3/1-2, 2O02 87<br />

Cmarli, which is nearby in <strong>the</strong> east <strong>of</strong><br />

Trabzon. Two adult males, one adult and<br />

young females were retrieved from<br />

Camlik which is 68 km west <strong>of</strong> Trabzon.<br />

The locality <strong>of</strong> Cumhuriyet is approximately<br />

one km from <strong>the</strong> sea with an altitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> 80 m., while <strong>the</strong> Ballica and<br />

Sugeldi localities are two or three km<br />

from <strong>the</strong> sea, with an altitude <strong>of</strong> 250-330<br />

m. Although Ballica and Sugeldi specimens<br />

were captured near <strong>the</strong> tea plant<br />

Camellia sirennis, <strong>the</strong> Cmarli and<br />

Cumhuriyet specimens were captured on<br />

short grassland populated by Oak<br />

Quercussp., Alder Alnus sp. and hazelnut<br />

Corylus sp. trees.<br />

Pattern and coloration were examined<br />

and noted for five adult and three immature<br />

specimens. In addition, black and<br />

white slides were taken. Then specimens<br />

were fixed with 70% ethanol. For morphometric<br />

studies, 9 vipers were examined,<br />

and for all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se specimens 16<br />

different items <strong>of</strong> data were obtained.<br />

Total and tail length were measured. In<br />

addition, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> ventrals, subcaudals,<br />

anterior, mid-body and posterior<br />

dorsal scale rows, apical plates, supralabials,<br />

sublabials, circumocular scales, loreals,<br />

chanthals, crown scales and zig-zag<br />

spirals in <strong>the</strong> dorsal band were counted. A<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r rostral index (height/breadth) was<br />

calculated. The division <strong>of</strong> parietals and<br />

frontals was noted. This information was<br />

used in morphological description, taxonomical<br />

analyses and comparison with<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Vipera barani and Vipera pontica<br />

captured from different locations.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The new specimens from lowland populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> Yomra, Of and Vakfikebir show<br />

some differences in terms <strong>of</strong> scalation and<br />

colour pattern in comparison to <strong>the</strong> subalpine<br />

population (Arpaozu). Also, our<br />

specimens were compared to Vipera<br />

barani and Vipera pontica, which were<br />

described from Adapazan and Rize, in<br />

order to clarify <strong>the</strong>se morphological similarities<br />

and differences within both<br />

species. In addition, <strong>the</strong>y were compared<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Camlyhemsin specimens, which<br />

had not yet received a clear taxonomic<br />

position (Table 1).<br />

Table 1. External morphology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Trabzon viper specimens collected from <strong>the</strong><br />

Arpaozu, Of, Yomra and Vakfikebir and related taxa (V. barani and V. pontica)<br />

Characters<br />

Tail length (mm)<br />

Total length (mm)<br />

Ventral<br />

Subcaudal<br />

Dorsal scales<br />

Neck<br />

Mid-body<br />

Pasterior<br />

Apicals<br />

Chantals<br />

Rostral index<br />

Loreals<br />

Supralabials<br />

Sublabiais<br />

Circumoculars<br />

Crown scales<br />

Zig-zag band<br />

Arpaozu<br />

2(2)<br />

52-73<br />

444-590<br />

142<br />

28-29<br />

25-26<br />

21<br />

17<br />

1<br />

2-2<br />

1.12-1.24<br />

4-5<br />

8-9<br />

9-11<br />

8-9<br />

18-24<br />

48(49)<br />

Of<br />

2(6")<br />

82-83<br />

518-543<br />

140-141<br />

33-37<br />

24-25<br />

21<br />

17-18<br />

2<br />

2-2<br />

1.05-1.18<br />

5-5<br />

9-9<br />

11-11<br />

10-13<br />

22-25<br />

67-*<br />

Yomra<br />

1(2)<br />

78<br />

634<br />

148<br />

29<br />

26<br />

21<br />

17<br />

2<br />

2-2<br />

1.10<br />

4-5<br />

9-8<br />

10-11<br />

11<br />

26<br />

56<br />

2(2)<br />

22-69<br />

176-627<br />

149<br />

30-31<br />

23-25<br />

21<br />

17<br />

2<br />

2-2<br />

1.05-1.07<br />

5-4<br />

8-9<br />

10-11<br />

9-10<br />

22-25<br />

62-65<br />

= Character was not visible because <strong>of</strong> damaged specimen<br />

Vakfikebir<br />

2(


88 Biota 3 -2, 2OO2 KUTRUP & YILMAZ<br />

As can be seen in Table 1, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

ventrals in <strong>the</strong> specimens caught from<br />

Trabzon falls between 141 and 145,<br />

except for two specimens collected from<br />

Yomra and Vakfikebir. These specimens<br />

have a high number <strong>of</strong> ventrals (148-<br />

149), a feature which is not counted in V.<br />

barani and V. pontica. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

subcaudals in males is higher than in<br />

females (33-38 instead <strong>of</strong> 28-31 in<br />

females). Also, it is obvious that males<br />

have longer tails than females.<br />

Consequently, <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> tail length to<br />

total length, which is 0.11-0.13 in<br />

females and 0.15-0.17 in males, confirms<br />

this result. The Arpaozu population (two<br />

females) shows remarkable differences<br />

from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r lowland populations in<br />

having one apical (Figure 1), a feature<br />

which is normally found only in Vipera<br />

ursinii, and occasionally in <strong>the</strong> V. kaznakovicomplex<br />

(V. kaznakovi, V. dinniki<br />

and V. darevski). In contrast, one apical<br />

was not reported ei<strong>the</strong>r in V. barani or in<br />

Figure 1. Dorsal view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

adult female from Arpaozu<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Arpaozu specimens are<br />

very different from <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> this<br />

group (V. kaznakovi complex).<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> crown scales (interchantals<br />

+intersupraoculars ) is much lower in<br />

Trabzon specimens (18-26) than in <strong>the</strong> V.<br />

pontica (34), V. barani (25-40) and<br />

Camlyhemsin specimens (25-33). But<br />

only a young male from Vakfikebir differs<br />

from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs in having higher crown<br />

scales (33) than in <strong>the</strong> V. barani and V.<br />

pontica specimens.<br />

Additionally, <strong>the</strong> Trabzon specimens have<br />

lower loreal counts (4-5, 5-4 and 5-5)<br />

(Figure 2). Four <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specimens examined<br />

have 5-5 loreals like <strong>the</strong><br />

Camlyhemsin ones (5-5), while <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

show similarities with V. barani (3-6).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, our specimens differ from<br />

Figure 2. Lateral view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

adult male from Balhca<br />

<strong>the</strong> V. pontica, V. barani and<br />

Camlyhemsin specimens in having fewer<br />

circumoculars (9-11 instead <strong>of</strong> 10-14 in<br />

\. pontica V. (Table barani, 1). 11-12 However, in V. pontica colour and 10-12<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Camlyhemsin specimens) On <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> Balhca specimens show<br />

clear similarities in circumocular counts<br />

(12-13) with V. barani (figure 2).<br />

Head scales between <strong>the</strong> rostral and posterior<br />

end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parietal area, as well as<br />

temporal, are not keeled as in V. barani<br />

and V. pontica. The head morphology <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Trabzon specimens differs from that<br />

<strong>of</strong> V. pontica in having much more blunt<br />

and expanded snouts than any member


KUTRUP & YILMAZ Biola '31-2,2002 89<br />

Figure 3. Dorsal view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adult Ballica<br />

male<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> berus complex (Figure 1).<br />

According to Billing et al. (1990), V. pontica<br />

has a pronounced snout Also our<br />

specimens do not have <strong>the</strong> markedly<br />

raised snouts which are normally found in<br />

several Caucasian viper populations such<br />

as V. pontica (Nilson et al. 1995).<br />

A great number <strong>of</strong> different colour<br />

morphs was expressed in <strong>the</strong> Caucasian<br />

vipers (Billing et al. 1990, Hoggren et al.<br />

1993, Nilson et al. 1995, Kutrup 1999).<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> Arpaozu locality, which was<br />

situated in high subalpine mountain belts<br />

(2000m) such as <strong>the</strong> Vipera dinniki locality<br />

(Nilson et al. 1994, 1995, Hoggren et<br />

al. 1993), has very different climatic factors<br />

and plant species, specimens belong-<br />

ing to Arpaozu did not show any significant<br />

differences in terms <strong>of</strong> colour and<br />

pattern from <strong>the</strong> lowland specimens.<br />

Only <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> spirals in <strong>the</strong> dorsal<br />

zig-zag band was lower in <strong>the</strong> Arpaozu<br />

specimens (48-49 instead <strong>of</strong> 62-67 in <strong>the</strong><br />

Of, Yomra, and Vakfikebir specimens,<br />

respectively) (Figure 3, Table 1). This high<br />

number <strong>of</strong> zig-zag bands (67) was normally<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> high populations <strong>of</strong> V.<br />

dinniki (Nilson et al. 1995, Joger et al.<br />

1997). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

zig-zag bands which was observed in<br />

adult samples was lower than in young<br />

ones. This could be given an ontogenetic<br />

explanation, as pattern <strong>of</strong>ten fades with<br />

age (Nilson et al. 1995).<br />

Only two melanistic specimens (one<br />

female from Arpaozu and one male from<br />

Sugeldi) were observed during <strong>the</strong> study<br />

period (Figure 1). In <strong>the</strong>se samples, a<br />

black coloration with high melanin production<br />

covered all o<strong>the</strong>r colour patterns.<br />

In contrast, dorsal patterns belonging to<br />

unmelanistic specimens consisted <strong>of</strong> light<br />

brown in adults and dark brown in <strong>the</strong><br />

young, and broad, black-bordered zigzag<br />

spirals with a total <strong>of</strong> 48-67 in both<br />

adults and young. Also, many dark<br />

blotches, which were vertically placed<br />

and not connected to <strong>the</strong> zig-zag band,<br />

were observed along <strong>the</strong> body sides.<br />

Head patterns <strong>of</strong> two black bands<br />

extended from <strong>the</strong> posterior end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

parietal area to <strong>the</strong> sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> neck and<br />

<strong>the</strong>y had wide, black-bordered bands,<br />

which ran from <strong>the</strong> eyes to <strong>the</strong> neck<br />

along <strong>the</strong> upper sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supralabials<br />

(Figure 2). All unmelanistic specimens<br />

had a blotch which was approximately<br />

elliptical on <strong>the</strong> neck, just as in V. barani<br />

from Adapazan (Joger et al. 1997) . The<br />

edges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supralabials, rostral , chanthals<br />

and supraoculars were white. All <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> samples had black ventrals. Although<br />

bigger white spots were only seen on <strong>the</strong><br />

ventral <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> head in <strong>the</strong> melanistic samples,<br />

many large and small white spots


90 Biota 3/1-2,2002 KUTRUP & YILMAZ<br />

extended from mentale to mid body area<br />

in <strong>the</strong> unmelanistic samples. These white<br />

spots also ran along <strong>the</strong> sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ventrals<br />

to <strong>the</strong> anale in young samples. The<br />

yellow coloration, which was seen at <strong>the</strong><br />

posterior area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subcaudals, was fairly<br />

distinct in all specimens.<br />

An examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> morphology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

different specimens clearly indicate that<br />

Trabzon vipers show some differences in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> colour patterns as well as scalation<br />

characteristics from V. barani and V.<br />

pontica. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>se vipers<br />

show similarities with V. barani and V.<br />

pontica in scalation as well as colour patterns.<br />

According to <strong>the</strong> scalation, <strong>the</strong><br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> Trabzon vipers may be<br />

belong to ei<strong>the</strong>r V. barani or V. pontica.<br />

But <strong>the</strong> colour patterns <strong>of</strong> our melanistic<br />

specimens are more similar to those in V.<br />

barani than to those in V. pontica.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> crown scales<br />

(interchanthals + intersupraoculars), loreals<br />

and circumoculars is lower in our specimens<br />

than in both o<strong>the</strong>r species.<br />

Taking into account <strong>the</strong> differences and<br />

similarities as indicated above, Trabzon<br />

samples have more similarities with V.<br />

barani than with V. pontica. Ultimately,<br />

we evaluate our vipers as Vipera barani.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, our viper samples can be<br />

evaluated as belonging to a subspecies <strong>of</strong><br />

V. barani (Joger, pers. comm.).<br />

It must be borne in mind that we would<br />

need a larger series <strong>of</strong> molecular data to<br />

find out more.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BARAN, I., TOSUNOGLU, M., KAYA, U. & KUMLUTAS, Y. 1997: Camlyhemsin (Rize<br />

Civarmm Herpeto- faunasi Hakkinda. Tr. j. <strong>of</strong> Zoology 21: 409-416.<br />

BILLING, H., NILSON, G. & SATTER, U. 1990: Vipera pontica sp. n., a new species in <strong>the</strong><br />

kaznakovi group (Reptia-Viperidae) from north-eastern Turkey and adjacent<br />

Transcaucasiana. Zool. Scripta 19: 231-237.<br />

B6HME, W. & JOGER, U. 1983: Eine neue Arts des Vipera berus -Komlexes aus der Turkei.<br />

Amphibia-Reptilia 4: 265-271.<br />

HOGGREN, M., NILSON, G., ANDREN, C, ORLOV, N. L & TUNIEV, B. S. 1993: Vipers <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Caucasus. Natural History and Systematic Review. Herpetological Natural<br />

History 1: 11-19.<br />

JOGER, U., LENK, P., BARAN, I., BOHME, W., ZEIGLER, T, HEIDRICH, P. & WINK, M. 1997:<br />

The phylogenetic position <strong>of</strong> Vipera barani and <strong>of</strong> V. niloskii within <strong>the</strong> Vipera<br />

berus complex. Herpetologica Bonnensis: 185-194.<br />

KUTRUP, B. 1999: The Morphology <strong>of</strong> Vipera ammodytes transcaucasiana (Reptilia,<br />

Viperidae) Specimens Collected from Murgul (Artvin. Turkey), Tr. J. <strong>of</strong> Zoology<br />

23: 433-438.<br />

NILSON, G., ANDREN, C. & SZYDLAR, Z. 1994: The systematic position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Common<br />

Adder, Vipera berus (L.) (Reptilia, Viperidae), in north Korea and adjacent regions.<br />

Bonn. Zool. Beitr. 45: 49-56.<br />

NILSON, G., TUNIEV, B., ORLOV, N. , HOGREN, M. & ANDREN, C. 1995. Systematics <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Vipers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caucasus: Polymorphism or Sibling Species. Asiatic<br />

Herpetological Research 6: 1 -26.<br />

VEDMEDERJA, V. L., ORLOV, N. L. & TUNIEV, B. S. 1986: On <strong>the</strong> taxonomy <strong>of</strong> three viper<br />

species <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vipera kaznakovi complex. In: Ananjeva, N. & Borkin, L. (eds).<br />

Systematics and Ecology <strong>of</strong> Amphibians and Reptiles. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Zoological Institute, Leningrad: 55-65. In Russian.


MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI Biota 3/i-a, 2002 91<br />

Reproduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Pond Turtle Emys orbicularis in<br />

<strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn limit<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species range<br />

A.CM. MEESKE1, N. SCHNEEWEISS2 & KJ.<br />

RYBCZYNSKi2<br />

1Zentrum fuer Naturschutz, Von-Siebold-Str.2r D-37075 Goettingen<br />

E-mail: mmeeske@gwdg.de<br />

2Naturschutzstation Rhinluch, Nauener Str. 68, D-16833 Linum<br />

E-mail: agena@t-online.de<br />

Abstract<br />

Incubation conditions and ecological requirements <strong>of</strong> nesting areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Pond Turtle Emys orbicularis were investigated in <strong>the</strong> summers <strong>of</strong> 1997-2001 in one<br />

local population in southwest Lithuania. Females were trapped and each individual was<br />

weighed, measured and colourmarked. Additionally, some females were tagged with<br />

radio transmitters to find out nest sites. Nesting started between <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> May and<br />

<strong>the</strong> first week <strong>of</strong> June. The nesting period extended over 14-20 days. Open areas on<br />

sandy dry grassland were used as nesting areas. Nest sites had expositions <strong>of</strong> 80-270°<br />

and were found on flat, slight or strongly inclined ground. The average vegetation cover<br />

amounted to 50%. 77% <strong>of</strong> females which were observed in at least three years nested<br />

in <strong>the</strong> same nesting area and 23% <strong>of</strong> females in different nesting areas. The mean nest<br />

size averaged 12,5 eggs. Females with larger body sizes frequently deposited a larger<br />

number <strong>of</strong> eggs. From captures <strong>of</strong> juveniles, successful reproduction for several years<br />

could be proved in <strong>the</strong> 90s. Suitable temperatures in summer and <strong>the</strong> following winter<br />

allow successful incubation.<br />

Keywords: Testudines, Emydidae, Emys orbicularis, reproduction, Lithuania<br />

Received 8 February2002; accepted 28 July 2002


92 Bio la 3 i-a, 2002 MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The European Pond Turtle Emys orbicularis<br />

is a threatened species, especially in<br />

<strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn range <strong>of</strong> its distribution<br />

(Juszczyk 1987, Zemanek 1988, 1991,<br />

Schiemenz & Gun<strong>the</strong>r 1994, Fritz 1996,<br />

Fritz & Gun<strong>the</strong>r 1996, Fritz 2000,<br />

Schneeweiss & Fritz 2000). In particular,<br />

during <strong>the</strong> last two centuries a heavy<br />

decline <strong>of</strong> European Pond Turtle was<br />

noticed. Lithuania represents <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

border <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species range (Fritz<br />

1996), where <strong>the</strong> subspecies orbicularis<br />

lives (Fritz 1992, 1998). Along this nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

border <strong>the</strong> climate, including short<br />

summers and cold winters, is very stressful<br />

to reproduction (Schneeweiss &<br />

Jablonski 2000).<br />

Up to <strong>the</strong> present, different sites with<br />

occurrences <strong>of</strong> turtles were found mainly<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country<br />

(Balciauskas et al. 1997), but <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

Figure 1. Geographic position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study area<br />

60° N<br />

BAlClC SGA<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> information about reproduction.<br />

The actual distribution and sizes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

local populations is still unknown.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, young turtles were noticed<br />

in different locations in Lazdijai District in<br />

southwestern Lithuania, which is a pro<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> reproduction success in <strong>the</strong>se areas.<br />

The present study examines incubation<br />

conditions and ecological requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

nesting areas in <strong>the</strong> view <strong>of</strong> incubation<br />

success under natural conditions.<br />

STUDY AREA<br />

The study area is located in southwestern<br />

Lithuania near <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern border<br />

with Poland (40 km SSW Alytus, Lazdijai<br />

District; 23°90'E, 54°40'N) (see Figure 1).<br />

This area experiences a cold continental<br />

climate, including warm summers and<br />

cold winters (Pearce & Smith 1993). The<br />

area contains different kinds <strong>of</strong> water<br />

bodies, partly seasonally flooded wet-


MEESKE,<br />

SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI Biota 3/i-a, 2002 93<br />

Figure 2. Map <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study area<br />

lands and sandy, dry areas, deciduous<br />

forests, pine forests and extensively used<br />

agricultured land. The local population<br />

inhabits two main ponds (A, G) and also<br />

uses several smaller and mainly temporary<br />

water bodies (B, C, D, E, F, H, I, K,<br />

M). Four nesting areas (I-IV) are situated<br />

in front <strong>of</strong> pine forests (see fig. 2).<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Before <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nesting period,<br />

females were captured in aquatic baited<br />

traps (method by Servan 1986) and in<br />

land traps and were weighed, measured<br />

(method by Fritz 1989, 1992, 1995) and<br />

colourmarked for identification. Some<br />

females were tagged with radio transmitters<br />

glued on <strong>the</strong> carapace. Localizations<br />

<strong>of</strong> turtles using a receiver (Stabo XR 100)<br />

connected to a hand operated unidirec-<br />

nesting area<br />

field<br />

way<br />

border <strong>of</strong> reserve<br />

tional antenna were recorded to find out<br />

nesting sites. Females were located by<br />

walking in <strong>the</strong> direction indicated by <strong>the</strong><br />

antenna (Homing-in-on-<strong>the</strong>-Animal)<br />

(White & Garrott 1990). During <strong>the</strong> nesting<br />

period <strong>the</strong> nesting areas were controlled<br />

every afternoon and evening to<br />

notice <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> females, <strong>the</strong>ir nesting<br />

behaviour and <strong>the</strong> nest locations.<br />

The degree <strong>of</strong> vegetation cover was estimated<br />

(1m2 around <strong>the</strong> nest). Expositions<br />

were noticed with a compass and inclinations<br />

with a protractor.<br />

RESULTS<br />

97% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females (30 <strong>of</strong> 31) were<br />

mature and 94% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females (29 <strong>of</strong> 31)<br />

were observed nesting at least once.<br />

The body sizes and body masses <strong>of</strong> mature<br />

females turtles are shown in Table 1.


94 3/1-2, 2OO2 MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI<br />

Figure 3. During nesting period 2000 daily observations <strong>of</strong> females and <strong>the</strong>ir nests in<br />

<strong>the</strong> investigation area in comparison with <strong>the</strong> daily maximum air temperature<br />

Date<br />

Beginning, duration and course <strong>of</strong> oviposition<br />

period<br />

In four years (1997r 1999-2001) <strong>the</strong><br />

nesting season started between <strong>the</strong> middle<br />

<strong>of</strong> May and <strong>the</strong> first week <strong>of</strong> June and<br />

continued 14-20 days.<br />

On various days during <strong>the</strong> nesting period<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> females wandering in<br />

<strong>the</strong> investigation area was higher than<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> observed ovipositions (see<br />

Figure 3). Some females could not be<br />

observed nesting in <strong>the</strong> known nesting<br />

areas. O<strong>the</strong>r females did not nest <strong>the</strong> first<br />

day <strong>of</strong> emergence from <strong>the</strong> water body.<br />

Table 1. Body sizes and body masses <strong>of</strong> mature females<br />

23<br />

26<br />

24<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18 ?<br />

• 16 £<br />

14 g<br />

12 |<br />

10 £<br />

S<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

131 observed Females<br />

E23 observed Nests<br />

Maximum Air Temperature °c<br />

Nesting Site Fidelity<br />

Animals inhabiting home pond A mainly<br />

used nesting areas II and III, whereas turtles<br />

inhabiting home pond G preferred<br />

nesting areas I and IV and unknown<br />

areas. Female turtles showed nesting site<br />

fidelity. 77% <strong>of</strong> females observed over<br />

three years (10 <strong>of</strong> 13) nested in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

nesting area (nesting site fidelity within<br />

300 m). 31% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females (4 <strong>of</strong> 13)<br />

showed fidelity within 20 m. 23% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

females (3 <strong>of</strong> 13) changed <strong>the</strong>ir nesting<br />

area.<br />

During five observation years, female<br />

Mean Range SD n<br />

Carapace length 170mm 146-189 mm 10.19 30<br />

Carapace width 136mm 120-152 mm 8.064 30<br />

Carapace height 72mm 54-86 nun 5.69 30<br />

Body mass 916 g 630-1252 g 365.1 25


MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI Biota 3/1-2,2002 95<br />

Table 2. Variation <strong>of</strong> nest sizes <strong>of</strong> female turtles with at least two nests in different years.<br />

Female<br />

KUC-22<br />

KUC-5<br />

KUC-12<br />

KUC-3<br />

KUC-6<br />

KUC-9<br />

KUC-16<br />

KUC-34<br />

KUC-33<br />

KUC-10<br />

KUC-17<br />

KUC-4<br />

KUC-21<br />

KUC-23<br />

Length <strong>of</strong><br />

carapace (mm)<br />

156<br />

160<br />

163<br />

169<br />

170<br />

173<br />

176<br />

176<br />

177<br />

181<br />

181<br />

182<br />

187<br />

188<br />

1997<br />

8<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

-<br />

12<br />

?<br />

-<br />

-<br />

13<br />

12<br />

9<br />

20<br />

12<br />

Number o<br />

1998<br />

-<br />

?<br />

10<br />

13<br />

9<br />

11<br />

-<br />

9<br />

12<br />

15<br />

11<br />

14<br />

16<br />

-<br />

"eggs laid<br />

1999<br />

-<br />

-<br />

9 9<br />

Figure 4. Comparison <strong>of</strong> females' carapace sizes with <strong>the</strong>ir clutch sizes in<br />

four observation years<br />

155 160 165 170 175 180 185 , 190 r 195 „<br />

Carapaxlength (mm)<br />

KUC-17 nested in three different nesting<br />

areas (nesting area I: 1997/98; nesting<br />

area II: 1999/2000; nesting area III:<br />

2001). Nesting area II included most <strong>of</strong> all<br />

nests. Before and after <strong>the</strong> first change <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> nesting area, KUC-17 showed nesting<br />

site fidelity and laid eggs within 10 m in<br />

two subsequent years. Female KUC-12<br />

searched every year for <strong>the</strong> same nesting<br />

area (III), which is divided into two suitable<br />

main parts. KUC-12 regularly<br />

9<br />

9<br />

14<br />

16<br />

10<br />

-<br />

12<br />

14<br />

17<br />

?<br />

2000<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

11<br />

13<br />

15<br />

17<br />

-<br />

-<br />

11<br />

14<br />

-<br />

15<br />

• Number <strong>of</strong> laid Eggs 1997<br />

- Number <strong>of</strong> laid Eggs 1998<br />

" Number <strong>of</strong> laid Eggs 1999<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> laid Eaas 2000<br />

changed <strong>the</strong>se locations and consequently<br />

used part I in 1997, 1999 and 2001<br />

and part II in 1998 and 2000.<br />

Clutch size<br />

The females deposited an average <strong>of</strong> 12,5<br />

eggs (range = 7-20, SE = 2,59, n = 46).<br />

Larger females frequently laid a larger<br />

number <strong>of</strong> eggs (see figure 4). Variation<br />

<strong>of</strong> nest sizes within individuals in different<br />

years is shown in Table 2.


96 Biota 3/1-2,2002 MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI<br />

Nesting females were older than 25<br />

years, up to very old females for which<br />

age was not determinable. The smallest<br />

females had <strong>the</strong> smallest clutch sizes<br />

(female KUC-22: 8 eggs in 1997; female<br />

KUC-19: 7 eggs in 2000), while one <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> largest and oldest females, KUC-21,<br />

laid <strong>the</strong> maximum number <strong>of</strong> 20 eggs in<br />

1997 (see Table 2).<br />

Nest site locations<br />

The females nested in open areas on<br />

spongy sandy ground on sandy dry grassland<br />

(n = 57) and in five cases on loamy<br />

ground. Around <strong>the</strong> nests, vegetation<br />

was found which showed sunny and dry<br />

conditions or sandy ground for this area.<br />

Index species are Hieradum pilosella,<br />

Artemisia scoparia and Sedum acre. The<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> vegetation cover ranged<br />

between 30-90% (mean = 55%, n = 16).<br />

The females chose places with inclinations<br />

between 0-20°. 45% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nests<br />

(14 <strong>of</strong> 31) were on flat ground (0-5°),<br />

19% (6 <strong>of</strong> 31) on slight inclined (5-10°),<br />

and 36% (11 <strong>of</strong> 31) on strongly inclined<br />

ground (10-20°).<br />

The expositions <strong>of</strong> 50 nest sites amounted<br />

to 80-270°.<br />

Reproduction success<br />

Young turtles from different years in <strong>the</strong><br />

90s were recorded in <strong>the</strong> study area. They<br />

hatched before 1997 or after <strong>the</strong> summer<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1999. These results in successful incubation<br />

were noticed only for <strong>the</strong> nests<br />

Table 3. Results <strong>of</strong> incubation success for nests without predation from August. All nests<br />

were protected against predators, controls <strong>of</strong> nests in May 2000 (*nest controlling in<br />

October 1999).<br />

Female<br />

KUC-6*<br />

KUC-12<br />

KUC-14<br />

KUC-16<br />

KUC-20<br />

KUC-23<br />

KUC-24<br />

Clutch size<br />

9<br />

12<br />

>7<br />

14<br />

12<br />

?<br />

?<br />

Unfertilized<br />

eggs%<br />

44<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1 egg<br />

Dead er<br />

before<br />

hatching<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1 embryo<br />

from 1999 during 1997-2000.<br />

After <strong>the</strong> warm summer in 1999, some<br />

nests showed signs <strong>of</strong> hatching in<br />

September and at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

October, but most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> juveniles left<br />

<strong>the</strong> nests during <strong>the</strong> following spring <strong>of</strong><br />

2000. 7 nests were checked after hatching<br />

and showed a high hatching rate up<br />

to 100% (see Table 3).<br />

8 nests from 1997 were dug out in <strong>the</strong><br />

middle <strong>of</strong> September during possible<br />

hatching time. Only 1 juvenile <strong>of</strong> a controlled<br />

79 eggs success<strong>full</strong>y left <strong>the</strong> egg<br />

shell before digging. Nests from 1998<br />

were not checked. Generally, no hatch-<br />

ibryo%<br />

after hatching<br />

11-22<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

8<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Remarks<br />

33% hatched success<strong>full</strong>y<br />

100% hatched success<strong>full</strong>y<br />

100% hatched success<strong>full</strong>y<br />

100% hatched success<strong>full</strong>y<br />

92% hatched success<strong>full</strong>y<br />

100% hatched success<strong>full</strong>y<br />

> 70% hatched success<strong>full</strong>y<br />

ing was observed. The next spring after<br />

<strong>the</strong> snow melted, 60% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nests were<br />

destroyed by predators. 7 nests from <strong>the</strong><br />

year 2000 (controlled in 2001) contained<br />

78% fertilized eggs (range: 30-100%),<br />

but no hatchling left <strong>the</strong> egg shell or <strong>the</strong><br />

breeding chamber respectively. The<br />

young turtles died before hatching in<br />

summer and autumn or during winter.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Beginning and duration <strong>of</strong> oviposition<br />

period<br />

Studies in central Poland showed that<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions influence <strong>the</strong> onset


MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI Biota 3/1-2,2002 97<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nesting period (Zemanek & Mitrus<br />

1997) and <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nesting<br />

period (Zemanek 1988)r which explains<br />

<strong>the</strong> differences in beginning and duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> nesting periods in Lithuania.<br />

Generally, females <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Pond<br />

Turtle deposited eggs in East Germany<br />

(Breitenstein 1973, Andreas & Paul 1998,<br />

Schneeweiss et al. 1998) and in Poland<br />

(Jablonski 1992, Jablonski & Jablonska<br />

1998, Zemanek & Mitrus 1997, Mitrus &<br />

Zemanek 1998, 2000) at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> May<br />

and in June. The results <strong>of</strong> this study support<br />

<strong>the</strong>se findings. The short summer in<br />

<strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn ranges does not allow later<br />

nesting (e.g. in July), because <strong>the</strong> time for<br />

incubation becomes too short. In sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

regions, nesting in July is not unusual<br />

(Fritz & Gun<strong>the</strong>r 1996).<br />

Nesting Site Fidelity<br />

77% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females had nests within <<br />

300 m distance from <strong>the</strong> previous nest.<br />

31 % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females nested within 20 m.<br />

23% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> females searched for different<br />

nesting areas, but presumably, more<br />

specimens shifted nesting areas. In two<br />

subsequent years, female KUC-10<br />

deposited eggs in <strong>the</strong> same nesting area.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> third year KUC-10 showed searching<br />

behaviour in <strong>the</strong> same area but was<br />

not observed nesting <strong>the</strong>re.<br />

Several Lithuanian females showed nesting<br />

site fidelity. Nesting site fidelity for<br />

European Pond Turtle is mentioned by<br />

Wermuth (1952) and Schneeweiss &<br />

Steinhauer (1998) for Germany, by<br />

Jablonski & Jablonska (1998) and Mitrus<br />

& Zemanek (2000) for Poland, and by<br />

Rovero & Chelazzi (1996) for Italy,<br />

although <strong>the</strong>re are no standardized definitions<br />

and no figures about nesting site<br />

fidelity. In Austria, European Pond Turtle<br />

females laid eggs within 14.5 m in 2 years<br />

(Roessler 2000). Various females <strong>of</strong><br />

Chrysemys picta marginata in Canada<br />

laid eggs within 10 m <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir previous<br />

nest (Christens & Bider 1987). Congdon<br />

et al. (1983) investigated an inter-annual<br />

fidelity <strong>of</strong> 73% <strong>of</strong> Emydoidea blandingi<br />

females to <strong>the</strong> nest area in Michigan and<br />

Loncke & Obhard (1977) <strong>of</strong> 92% <strong>of</strong><br />

Chelydra serpentina females in Canada.<br />

The Lithuanian results are approximately<br />

coincident with <strong>the</strong> observations <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

species.<br />

During five years <strong>of</strong> observation, female<br />

KUC-17 nested in three different nesting<br />

areas. The substrate in <strong>the</strong> first nesting<br />

area (I) seemed to be very unsuitable<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> very hard loamy ground.<br />

The reason for her next change from a<br />

suitable nesting area (II) to ano<strong>the</strong>r nesting<br />

area (III) is unknown. Regular shifting<br />

<strong>of</strong> nesting areas could be a kind <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />

strategy in comparison with nesting<br />

site fidelity. In various nesting areas<br />

different predation pressure on nests or<br />

different incubation conditions could<br />

occur. The shifting strategy also helps in<br />

searching for new nesting areas if old<br />

places were disturbed by overgrowth <strong>of</strong><br />

bushes and trees or were destroyed by<br />

man. The known nesting areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 80s<br />

in <strong>the</strong> same study area are partly unsuitable<br />

because <strong>of</strong> overgrowth today<br />

(Gruodis, verbal information, 2001), so<br />

<strong>the</strong> turtles were forced to search for o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

places. Schneeweiss & Steinhauer (1998)<br />

and Mitrus & Zemanek (2000) also<br />

assume that females change nesting<br />

areas when old places are destroyed. But<br />

Schneeweiss & Steinhauer (1998) also<br />

observed that if suitable places were not<br />

on females' migration routes, <strong>the</strong> females<br />

used unsuitable places.<br />

Clutch size<br />

In Lithuania <strong>the</strong> mean clutch size averaged<br />

12.5 eggs (range: 7-20 eggs) over 4<br />

years and was independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beginning<br />

or <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> nesting periods. In<br />

East Germany Etnys orbicularis females<br />

deposited an average number <strong>of</strong> 12.7<br />

eggs (Schneeweiss et al. 1998). This<br />

result agrees with <strong>the</strong> Lithuanian data.


98 Biota 3/1-2,2002 MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI<br />

Roessler (2000) found average clutch<br />

sizes <strong>of</strong> 12.4 eggs in Austria, but <strong>the</strong>re<br />

some females nested twice a year. The<br />

result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lithuanian range <strong>of</strong> clutch<br />

sizes is similar to observations <strong>of</strong> clutch<br />

sizes <strong>of</strong> 10-18 eggs in East Germany<br />

(Andreas & Paul 1998) and in Poland<br />

(Jablonski 1992, Zemanek & Mitrus<br />

1997, Mitrus & Zemanek 1998).<br />

Nest site locations<br />

In Lithuania similar results for nest site<br />

locations were found in comparison with<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r regions. The Lithuanian females<br />

mainly used open areas with sandy dry<br />

grassland for nesting (57 <strong>of</strong> 62 nests). In<br />

East Germany 18 <strong>of</strong> 32 nests were on<br />

xero<strong>the</strong>rmic sandy grassland and all nests<br />

were on sandy or sandy-loamy areas<br />

(Schneeweiss et al. 1998). In <strong>the</strong> study<br />

area <strong>the</strong> vegetation around <strong>the</strong> nests<br />

describes typical characteristics for nesting<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> European Pond Turtle<br />

(Meeske 1997). The degree <strong>of</strong> vegetation<br />

cover ranged between 30-90% (mean =<br />

55%, n = 16). A vegetation cover <strong>of</strong> nest<br />

sites <strong>of</strong> between 5-80% was observed in<br />

East Germany (Schneeweiss et al. 1998)<br />

and in Austria between 80-90% (Roessler<br />

2000). In Lithuania, in cases <strong>of</strong> high vegetation<br />

cover <strong>the</strong> plants were mainly<br />

species with short growth which do not<br />

impair <strong>the</strong> sun's radiation on <strong>the</strong> nest.<br />

The ecological requirements <strong>of</strong> nesting<br />

areas do not clearly differ in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

species range.<br />

Isberg (1929) mentions that <strong>the</strong> substrate<br />

type is an important incubation factor. If<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a spongy substrate as in<br />

Lithuania, <strong>the</strong> heat <strong>of</strong> sunshine can better<br />

permeate through upper strata and<br />

humidity can ooze away or evaporate<br />

easily.<br />

The factors <strong>of</strong> solar exposure and inclination<br />

have a strong impact on <strong>the</strong> vegetation<br />

and consequently on <strong>the</strong> ecoclimate<br />

(Schaefer 1992). The nests were in places<br />

with flat, slight or strongly inclined<br />

ground. The degree <strong>of</strong> slope has an effect<br />

on <strong>the</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> radiation. Additionally,<br />

sloping areas have <strong>the</strong> advantage that<br />

longer rain periods will do little harm to<br />

<strong>the</strong> clutches.<br />

Reproduction success<br />

In spring 2000 most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> young turtles<br />

left <strong>the</strong> nests from 1999. In Lithuania, <strong>the</strong><br />

main hatching time is in spring, as in<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r nor<strong>the</strong>rn regions where European<br />

Pond Turtle lives (East Germany: Andreas<br />

& Paul 1998; Poland: Zemanek 1992,<br />

Zemanek & Mitrus 1997, Mitrus &<br />

Zemanek 1998, 2000). After melting <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> snow in spring, <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>of</strong> water<br />

bodies in size and number is clearly more<br />

favourable than in autumn. The hatchlings<br />

have shorter ways to <strong>the</strong> next water<br />

body and can choose between various<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> water bodies with diverse depth,<br />

temperature, hiding sites and food selection.<br />

Fritz & Giin<strong>the</strong>r (1996) describe<br />

"spring hatching" in comparison with<br />

"autumn hatching" as a second kind <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction strategy, because after leaving<br />

<strong>the</strong> nests, juveniles have a long period<br />

<strong>of</strong> growth before hibernating.<br />

In different years in <strong>the</strong> 90s juveniles<br />

hatched in Lithuania, but during <strong>the</strong><br />

study only <strong>the</strong> warm summer 1999 and<br />

<strong>the</strong> gentle winter 1999/2000 guaranteed<br />

successful reproduction. Consequently,<br />

reproduction success strongly depends on<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions. The results <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study support <strong>the</strong> findings from nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

Germany and eastern Poland that in <strong>the</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn species range, favourable climatic<br />

conditions in <strong>the</strong> summer and <strong>the</strong><br />

following winter are necessary for reproduction<br />

(Schneeweiss & Jablonski 2000).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn range successful reproduction<br />

does not happen every year.<br />

That <strong>the</strong> actual reproduction success is<br />

sufficient for a survival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se populations<br />

in Lithuania may become clear in<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r study.


MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI Biota 3/1-2,2002 99<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Thanks to all people, institutes, and organisations who helped to render <strong>the</strong>se investigations<br />

possible, especially Dr. Linas Balciauskas (Vilnius), Dr. Uwe Fritz (Dresden), Dr.<br />

Pranas Mierauskas (Vilnius), Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Miihlenberg (Goettingen), Richard Podloucky<br />

(Hildesheim), Dr. Arunas Pranaitis (Meteliai), and to DAAD (German Academic<br />

Exchange Service), DGHT (German Society for Herpetology), Institute <strong>of</strong> Ecology<br />

(University Vilnius), Meteliai Regional Pare Service, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment (Vilnius),<br />

Universitaetsbund Goettingen, Center for Nature Conservation (University Goettingen).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANDREAS, B. & PAUL, R. 1998: Clutch size and structure <strong>of</strong> breeding chambers <strong>of</strong> Emys o.<br />

orbicularis in Brandenburg. In: Fritz, U., Joger, U., Podloucky, R. & Servan, J.<br />

(eds.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMYS Symposium Dresden 96. Mertensiella,<br />

Rheinbach 10: 29-32.<br />

BALCIAUSKAS, L., TRAKIMAS, G., JUSKAITIS, R., ULEVICIUS, A. & BALCIAUSKIENIE, L.<br />

1997: Lietuvos zinduoliu, varliagyviu ir ropliu atlasas. Projekto Lietuvos ekologine<br />

ivairovex grupe Ekologijos institutas Vilnius: 112s.<br />

BREITENSTEIN, W. 1973: Eiablage der Europaischen Sumpfschildkrote. Aquarien Terrarien<br />

20: 130S.<br />

CHRISTENS, E. & BIDER, J.R. 1987: Nesting Activity and Hatching Success <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Painted<br />

Turtle (Chrysemys picta marginata) in Southwestern Quebec. Herpetologica 43:<br />

55-65.<br />

CONGDON, J.D., TINKLE, D.W., BREITENBACH, G.L. & VAN LOBEN SELS, R.C. 1983:<br />

Nesting Ecology and Hatching Success in <strong>the</strong> Turtle Emydoidea blandingi.<br />

Herpetologica 39: 417-429.<br />

FRITZ, U. 1992: Zur innerartlichen Variabilitat von Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus, 1758), 2.<br />

Variabilitat in Osteuropa und Rededefinition von Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus,<br />

1758) und E. o. hellenica (Valenciennes, 1832) (Reptilia: Testudines: Emidae).<br />

Zoologische Abhandlungen des Staatlichen Museums fur Tierkunde Dresden 47:<br />

37-77.<br />

FRITZ, U. 1995: Zur innerartlichen Variabilitat von Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus, 1758), 5a.<br />

Taxonomie in Mittel-Westeuropa, auf Korsika, Sardinien, der Apeninnen-<br />

Halbinsel und Sizilien und Unterartengruppen von E. orbicularis (Reptilia:<br />

Testudines: Emydidae). Zoologische Abhandlungen des Staatlichen Museums fur<br />

Tierkunde Dresden 48: 185-242.<br />

FRITZ, U. 1996: Zur innerartlichen Variabilitat von Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus, 1758), 5b.<br />

Intraspezifische Hierarchic und Zoogeographie (Reptilia: Testudines: Emydidae).<br />

Abhandlungen des Staatlichen Museums fur Tierkunde Dresden 49: 31-71.<br />

FRITZ, U. 1998: Introduction to zoogeography and subspecific differentiation in Emys orbicularis<br />

(Linnaeus, 1785). In: Fritz, U., Joger, U.p Podloucky, R. & Servan, J. (eds.)<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMYS Symposium Dresden 96. Mertensiella, Rheinbach 10:1-<br />

27.<br />

FRITZ, U. 2000: Verbreitung, Formenvielfalt und Schutz der Europaischen Sumpfschildkrote<br />

Emys orbicularis (L.). In: Hodl, W. & Roessler, M. (eds.). Die Europaische<br />

Sumpfschildkrote. Biologiezentrum d. OO. Landesmuseums, Stapfia69: 13-20.<br />

FRITZ, U. & GUNTHER, R. 1996: Europaische Sumpfschildkrote - Emys orbicularis<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758). In: Gun<strong>the</strong>r, R. (ed.). Die Amphibien und Reptilien<br />

Deutschlands. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena: 825 s.<br />

ISBERG, O 1929: Das ehemalige Vorkommen der Sumpfschildkrote (Emys orbicularis) in


100 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI<br />

Schweden und damit zusammenhangende klimatische Erscheinungen. Arkiv for<br />

zoologi 21 A: 1-54.<br />

JABLONSKI, A. 1992: Zolw Blotny. in (1992): Polska czerwona ksiega zwierzat. Warszawa:<br />

231-323.<br />

JABLONSKI, A. & JABLONSKA, S. 1998: Egg-laying in Emys orbicularis (L.), in Leczynsko -<br />

Wlodawskie Lake District (Eastern Poland). In: Fritz, U., Joger, U., Podloucky, R.<br />

& Servan, J. (eds.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMYS Symposium Dresden 96.<br />

Mertensiella, Rheinbach 10: 141-146.<br />

JUSZCZYK, W. 1987: Plazy i gady krajowe. Czesc 3. Gady Reptilia. PWN (Panstwowe<br />

Wydawnictwo Naukowe), Warszawa: 214 s.<br />

LONCKE, D.J. & OBHARD, M.E. 1977: Tag Success, Dimensions, Clutch Size and Nesting<br />

Site Fidelity for <strong>the</strong> Snapping Turtle, Chelydra serpentina, (Reptilia, Testudines,<br />

Chelydridae) in Algonquin Park, Ontario, Canada. Journal <strong>of</strong> Herpetology 11:<br />

243-244.<br />

MEESKE, M. 1997: Nesting ecology <strong>of</strong> Emys orbicularis in South Lithuania. Acta Zoologica<br />

Lituanica, Institute <strong>of</strong> Ecology, Vilnius, Vol. 7 Biodiversity: 138-142.<br />

MITRUS, S. & ZEMANEK, M. 1998: Reproduction <strong>of</strong> Emys orbicularis (L.) in Central Poland.<br />

In: Fritz, U., Joger, U., Podloucky, R. & Servan, J. (eds.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMYS<br />

Symposium Dresden 96. Mertensiella, Rheinbach 10: 187-191.<br />

MITRUS, S. & ZEMANEK, M. 2000: Distribution and biology <strong>of</strong> Emys orbicularis (L.) in<br />

Poland. In: Hodl, W. & Roessler, M. (eds.). Die Europaische Sumpfschildkrote.<br />

Biologiezentrum d. OO. Landesmuseums, Stapfia69: 107-118.<br />

PEARCE, E. A. & SMITH, C.G. 1993: The world wea<strong>the</strong>r guide. 3. Auflg.. Helicon Publishing<br />

Ltd, Oxford<br />

ROESSLER, M. 2000: Die Fortpflanzung der Europaischen Sumpfschildkroten Emys orbicularis<br />

(L.) im Nationalpark Donau-Auen (Niederosterreich). In Hodl, W. & Roessler,<br />

M. (eds.). Die Europaische Sumpfschildkrote. Biologiezentrum d. OO.<br />

Landesmuseums, Stapfia69: 145-156.<br />

ROVERO, F. & CHELAZZI, G. 1996: Nesting migrations in a population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European<br />

pond turtle Emys orbicularis (L.) (Chelonia Emydidae) from central Italy.<br />

Ethology, Ecology & Evolution 8: 297-304.<br />

SCHAEFER, M. 1992: Worterbucher der Biologie: Okologie. 3., uberarb. u. erw. Auflg.,<br />

Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena: 433 S.<br />

SCHIEMENZ, H. & GUNTHER, R. 1994: Verbreitungsatlas der Amphibien und Reptilien<br />

Ostdeutschlands (Gebiet der ehemaligen DDR). Rangsdorf: 143 S.<br />

SCHNEEWEISS, N. & STEINHAUER, C. 1998: Habitat use and migrations <strong>of</strong> a remnant population<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European pond turtle, Emys o. orbicularis (Linnaeus, 1785),<br />

depending on landscape structures in Brandenburg, Germany. In: Fritz, U., Joger,<br />

U., Podloucky, R. & Servan, J. (eds.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMYS Symposium<br />

Dresden 96. Mertensiella, Rheinbach 10: 235-243.<br />

SCHNEEWEISS, N., ANDREAS, B. & JENDRETZKE, N. 1998: Reproductive ecology data <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> European pond turtle (Emys o. orbicularis) in Brandenburg, Nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

Germany. In: Fritz, U., Joger, U., Podloucky, R. & Servan, J. (eds.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> EMYS Symposium Dresden 96. Mertensiella, Rheinbach 10: 227-234.<br />

SCHNEEWEISS, N. & FRITZ, U. 2000: Situation, Gefahrdung und Schutz von Emys orbicularis<br />

(L.) in Deutschland. In Hodl, W. & Roessler, M. (eds.). Die Europaische<br />

Sumpfschildkrote. Biologiezentrum d. OO. Landesmuseums, Stapfia 69: 133-<br />

144.<br />

SCHNEEWEISS, N. & JABLONSKI, A. 2000: The reproduction <strong>of</strong> Emys orbicularis in relation<br />

to climatic factors in Nor<strong>the</strong>ast Germany and Eastern Poland. In: Buskirk, J.,


MEESKE, SCHNEEWEISS & RYBCZYNSKI 3/1-2,2002 101<br />

Cheylan, A/I., Duguy, R., Fritz, U.r Jablonski, A., Keller, C, Pieau, C., Podloucky,<br />

R., Servan J. & Taskavak, E. (eds.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2. International Symposium<br />

on Emys orbicularis. Edition Soptom, Chelonii 2: 83-87.<br />

SERVAN, J. 1986: Utilisation d'un nouveau piege pour I'etude des populations de Cistude<br />

d'Europe Emys orbicularis (Reptilia: Testudines). Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) 41: 111-<br />

117.<br />

WERMUTH, H. 1952: Die Europaische Sumpfschildkrote. Neue Brehm-Bucherei 81,<br />

Wittenberg-Lu<strong>the</strong>rstadt: 40 S.<br />

WHITE, G.C. & GARROTT, R.A. 1990: Home range estimation. In: White, G.C. & Garrott,<br />

R.A. (eds.). Analysis <strong>of</strong> Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data. Academic Press, INC., San<br />

Diego, U.S.A.: 145-182.<br />

ZEMANEK, M. 1988: Skladanie jaj przez zolwie blotne, Emys orbicularis (L), w Polsce<br />

Srodkowej w warunkach naturalnych. Przeglad Zoologiczny XXXII: 405-417.<br />

ZEMANEK, A/I. 1991: Wystepowanie zolwia blotnego, Emys orbicularis (L.) w Polsce i<br />

zagadnienia jego ochrony. Przyglad Zoologiczny. XXXV: 337-347.<br />

ZEMANEK, M. & MITRUS, S. 1997: Biologia i ochrona Zollwia blotnego Emys orbicularis w<br />

Wojewodztwie radomskim. Chronmy Przyrode Ojczysta 53/1: 67-83.


AAENEGON & SALVIDIO Biota 3/1-2,2002 103<br />

Notes on habitat, egg-laying and<br />

first record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advertisement<br />

call <strong>of</strong> Hyperolius kihangensis<br />

Michele MENEGON1 & Sebastiano<br />

SALVIDIO2<br />

'Museo Tridentino di Storia Naturale, Via Calepina 14, C. P. 393, 1-38100 Trento,<br />

Italia,<br />

2Dipartimento per lo Studio del Territorio e delle sue Risorse (DIP.TE.RIS), Corso<br />

Europa26, Genova, 1-16132 Italia.<br />

Abstract<br />

Hyperolius kihangensis is a small treefrog endemic to <strong>the</strong> Udzungwa Scarp Forest <strong>of</strong> SE<br />

Tanzania. It breeds only in a restricted area characterised by flooded swamps with shallow<br />

water within dense highland forests. During a herpetological survey conducted in<br />

1998-1999, some ecological data were obtained and <strong>the</strong> male advertisement call was<br />

recorded at <strong>the</strong> type locality. The call <strong>of</strong> H. kihangensis is composed <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> four<br />

discrete squeaks <strong>of</strong> low amplitude, with <strong>the</strong> fundamental frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> note at about<br />

2,72 kHz, and with a dominant frequency <strong>of</strong> about 3.4 kHz. The advertisement call <strong>of</strong><br />

H. kihangensis is unusual within <strong>the</strong> genus because <strong>of</strong> its peculiar tonal quality. A few<br />

Hyperolius species show similar features in <strong>the</strong>ir breeding call, for example, H. kachalo-<br />

/aefrom Zambia and H. viridigulosus fram West Africa.<br />

Key words: advertisement call, Eastern Arc forests, Hyperolius kihangensis, Tanzania<br />

Received 3 September 2001; accepted 1 April 2002


104 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 MENEGON & SALVIDIO<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Hyperolius kihangensis has recently been<br />

described in a restricted area in<br />

Udzungwa Scarp Forest Reserve, Eastern<br />

Arc Mountains, Tanzania (preliminarily<br />

described by Schi0tz & Westergaard in<br />

Schi0tz 1999, <strong>the</strong>n formally by Schi0tz &<br />

Westergaard 2000). This endemic<br />

treefrog is small, <strong>the</strong> male reaching 19<br />

mm, and <strong>the</strong> female 26 mm in total<br />

length. A brown hourglass (i.e. eightshaped)<br />

dorsal spot characterizes its dorsal<br />

colouration in both sexes (Schi0tz<br />

1999, Schi0tz & Westergaard 2000).<br />

Males have granular dorsal skin and a<br />

gular flap. Swollen white spots, consisting<br />

mainly <strong>of</strong> iridophores, are also present in<br />

a consistent proportion (i.e. about 25%)<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population, both in males and<br />

females (Westergaard et al. 2000).<br />

Little is known about <strong>the</strong> biology <strong>of</strong> this<br />

species (Schi0tz & Westergaard in Schi0tz<br />

1999) and <strong>the</strong> breeding call <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> male<br />

has not been recorded or described.<br />

During two field expeditions in <strong>the</strong><br />

Udzungwa Scarp Forest Reserve, conducted<br />

between December 1998 and<br />

January 1999, we had <strong>the</strong> opportunity to<br />

collect more specimens <strong>of</strong> this treefrog, to<br />

observe egg clutches, and to record its<br />

call directly in <strong>the</strong> field. The aim <strong>of</strong> this<br />

paper is to describe some aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

reproductive behaviour and <strong>the</strong> advertisement<br />

call <strong>of</strong> this little known<br />

Tanzanian treefrog.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Thirty days <strong>of</strong> field search were conducted<br />

in Udzungwa Scarp Forest Reserve,<br />

Iringa Region, between December 1998<br />

and January 1999. The site's geographical<br />

coordinates were obtained with a<br />

Magellan 3000 global position system<br />

(GPS) navigator.<br />

The advertisement call <strong>of</strong> Hyperolius<br />

kihangensis was recorded with a Sony<br />

"TCM 1000a" tape recorder and a Shure<br />

prologue directional microphone. Sound<br />

analysis was carried out on an Apple<br />

Macintosh G4 personal computer. The<br />

signal was sampled at 44.100 Hertz and<br />

16 bit resolution. Canary 1.2.4 s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

(Charif et al. 1993) was used for <strong>the</strong><br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> temporal and spectral<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> call, and to generate<br />

audiospectrograms. Frequency information<br />

was obtained through Fast Fourier<br />

Transform (FFT size: 4096 pt.). The call<br />

variables analysed were note duration,<br />

internote duration, fundamental frequency,<br />

dominant frequency, and changes in<br />

dominant frequency. For each parameter<br />

mean, standard deviation and range are<br />

given.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Habitat<br />

The study site is located in <strong>the</strong> Udzungwa<br />

Scarp at about 1780 m a.s.l (08°22'24"S,<br />

35°58'34"E) and is characterised by a<br />

typical highland vegetation (Moreau<br />

1935). As reported by Schi0tz (1999) and<br />

Schi0tz & Westergaard (2000),<br />

Hyperolius kihangensis was found only in<br />

a small swampy area inside <strong>the</strong> forest in<br />

proximity to <strong>the</strong> Kihanga stream. During<br />

our field research about 30 specimens <strong>of</strong><br />

both sexes were observed, and 9 (7 males<br />

and 2 females) were collected. Treefrogs<br />

were found on leaves between 30 and<br />

about 200 cm above <strong>the</strong> ground. The<br />

small swamp where <strong>the</strong> frogs were found<br />

covered a surface <strong>of</strong> about 1500 square<br />

metres. This area is more open than <strong>the</strong><br />

surrounding canopy forest, and is completely<br />

covered by grasses and shrubs.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> day <strong>the</strong> swamp received a<br />

greater quantity <strong>of</strong> sunlight than <strong>the</strong><br />

neighbouring shaded areas, and some<br />

random air temperature measurements<br />

showed relatively higher mean temperatures<br />

in <strong>the</strong> swamp (27.1 °C) in comparison<br />

with <strong>the</strong> surrounding forest (25°C).<br />

Several specimens, mating pairs and egg<br />

clutches, <strong>of</strong> which two contained tadpoles,<br />

were observed. Two egg clutches


MENEGON & SALVIDIO Biota 3/i-a, 2002 105<br />

were adherent to leaves and grasses<br />

above or not far from shallow, stagnant<br />

water and contained 47 to 76 eggs,<br />

respectively. The eggs had a black and a<br />

white pole and <strong>the</strong> slime was clear.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> day, Hyperolius kihangensis<br />

remained on branches or leaves in shade<br />

with <strong>the</strong> limbs close to <strong>the</strong> body; fingers<br />

and toes were kept between <strong>the</strong> body<br />

and <strong>the</strong> substrate. This diurnal sleeping<br />

posture is functional in reducing <strong>the</strong> surface<br />

area exposed to <strong>the</strong> air and <strong>the</strong>reby<br />

<strong>the</strong> evaporative water loss (Duellman &<br />

Trueb 1986).<br />

Six treefrog species have been listed by<br />

Schi0tz & Westergaard (2000) for this<br />

forest. These are: Hyperolius kihangensis,<br />

Hyperolius puncticulatus, Hyperolius<br />

spinigularis, Afrixalus uluguruensis,<br />

Leptopelis parkeri and Leptopelis barbouri.<br />

During our field researches we<br />

observed all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species, and in addition<br />

two specimens <strong>of</strong> Leptopelis uluguruensis<br />

were collected, thus confirming<br />

<strong>the</strong> previous doubtful record for <strong>the</strong><br />

Udzungwa Mountains (Schi0tz 1999).<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advertisement<br />

call<br />

During <strong>the</strong> month in <strong>the</strong> field, only once<br />

did we hear <strong>the</strong> breeding call <strong>of</strong> H.<br />

kihangensis, in spite <strong>of</strong> several hours <strong>of</strong><br />

night listening. The call <strong>of</strong> a Hyperolius<br />

kihangensis male (SVL 18.2 mm) was<br />

recorded after almost an hour <strong>of</strong> attempts<br />

during <strong>the</strong> night (January 2nd 1999, 9.45<br />

p.m., air temperature = 19,7°C, relative<br />

air humidity 97%). Just two sequences <strong>of</strong><br />

four notes were recorded from this<br />

voucher specimen that is now conserved<br />

in <strong>the</strong> herpetological collection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Museo Tridentino di Scienze Natural! <strong>of</strong><br />

Trento (collection number MTSN 086TA),<br />

as well as all original pictures regarding<br />

<strong>the</strong> species.<br />

The advertisement call <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> male was a<br />

low pitched voice, composed <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Figure 1. Audiospectrogram and waveform <strong>of</strong> a complete sequence <strong>of</strong><br />

four notes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> breeding call <strong>of</strong> Hyperolius kihangensis.<br />

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1£ IjB<br />

S 0-0 02 0.4 Q& J.4 1j6


106 Biota 3/1-2,2002 AAENEGON & SALVIDIO<br />

Figure 2. Frequency spectrum and audiospectrogram <strong>of</strong> a single<br />

note <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> breeding call <strong>of</strong> Hyperolius kihangensis.<br />

Table 1. Summary <strong>of</strong> numerical parameters <strong>of</strong> Hyperolius<br />

kihangensis advertisement call recorded at 19.7°C. kHz =<br />

kiloHertz, ms = milliseconds, S.D. = standard deviation.<br />

Call feature<br />

Fundamental frequency (kHz)<br />

Dominant frequency (kHz)<br />

Changes in dominant frequency<br />

(kHz)<br />

Note duration (ms)<br />

Internote duration (ms)<br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> four discrete notes. Every<br />

note had a slight variation in frequency<br />

(i.e., frequency modulation) and a peculiar<br />

tonal quality. The audiospectrogram<br />

depicts <strong>the</strong>se very characteristic features<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> note (Figure 1). Two consecutive<br />

calls were recorded and analyzed; each is<br />

a sequence <strong>of</strong> four discrete notes, similar<br />

Mean ± S.D.<br />

2.076 ±0.1 96<br />

3.368 ±0.175<br />

782.5 ±113.7<br />

57 ± 6.23<br />

35 1.97 ±24.54<br />

Range<br />

2.225 - 3.208<br />

3.048 - 3.578<br />

666 - 956<br />

48.9 - 65.2<br />

321.9-381<br />

in fundamental and dominant frequency<br />

as well as note duration and frequency<br />

modulation. The intercall duration was<br />

about 20 seconds. As depicted in Figure<br />

2, <strong>the</strong> fundamental frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

note was about 2.72 kHz and <strong>the</strong> dominant<br />

frequency 3.38 kHz. Each note had<br />

three to four peaks <strong>of</strong> intensity. The


MENEGON & SALVIDIO Biota 3/1-2,2002 107<br />

power spectrum and <strong>the</strong> audiospectrogram<br />

<strong>of</strong> a single note <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> call were<br />

analyzed and are shown in Figure 2. The<br />

fundamental and dominant frequencies<br />

were highlighted and it is possible to<br />

appreciate that <strong>the</strong> note duration was<br />

about 56.5 ms. A summary <strong>of</strong> several call<br />

parameters is given in Table 1.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

During our herpetological research in <strong>the</strong><br />

Udzungwa Scarp Forest Reserve, several<br />

mating pairs and egg clutches <strong>of</strong> H.<br />

kihangensis were observed. However,<br />

only one single male was heard calling<br />

and recorded. The very low frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

calling, combined with <strong>the</strong> brevity and<br />

quietness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advertisement call <strong>of</strong> this<br />

species, could be reasons for <strong>the</strong> difficulty<br />

<strong>of</strong> recording vocalisations <strong>of</strong> H.<br />

kihangensis males. Thus, <strong>the</strong>re is a possibility<br />

that o<strong>the</strong>r Hyperolius species (H.<br />

tanneri and H. spinigularis) with welldeveloped<br />

gular sacs but with unknown<br />

voices (Schi0tz 1999, Schi0tz &<br />

Westergaard 2000) could emit short and<br />

very low-pitched calls, not easily recognizable.<br />

With respect to its breeding habitat and<br />

reproductive behaviour, H. kihangensis is<br />

quite different from all o<strong>the</strong>r Hyperolius<br />

species known for <strong>the</strong> Eastern Arc forests<br />

<strong>of</strong> Africa. Instead, it is comparable to<br />

some small, West African forest treefrogs<br />

such as H. zonatus and <strong>the</strong> larger H.<br />

bobirensis (Schi0tz 1999).<br />

The advertisement call <strong>of</strong> Hyperolius<br />

kihangensis is unusual within <strong>the</strong> genus,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> its peculiar tonal quality. A<br />

few species, such as H. kachalolae from<br />

Zambia and <strong>the</strong> West African H. viridigulosus,<br />

show similar features in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

breeding calls. The calls <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species<br />

are, however, clearly formed <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong><br />

harmonics. In <strong>the</strong> former, <strong>the</strong> fundamental<br />

and <strong>the</strong> dominant frequency are <strong>the</strong><br />

same, while in <strong>the</strong> latter <strong>the</strong> harmonics<br />

have a complex pattern <strong>of</strong> intensity maxima<br />

(Schi0tz .1999).<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

These data are part <strong>of</strong> a herpetological research project authorized by COSTECH<br />

(research permit # 98-028-CC-98-13). Special thanks are due to David Mover (Iringa)<br />

and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kim Howell (University <strong>of</strong> Dar es Salaam) for helping us to obtain research<br />

permits and for many useful suggestions. We wish to thank Paolo Pedrini, Ivan<br />

Farronato and Martin Pickersgill for <strong>the</strong>ir comments on <strong>the</strong> preliminary version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

manuscript<br />

REFERENCES<br />

CHARIF, R. A., MITCHELL, S. & CLARK, C. W. 1996: Canary 2.0 Users' manual. Cornell<br />

Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA.<br />

DUELLMAN, W.E. & TRUEB, L. 1986: Biology <strong>of</strong> Amphibians. Johns Hopkins University<br />

Press, Baltimore & London.<br />

MOREAU, R. E. 1935: A synecological study <strong>of</strong> Usambara, Tanganyka Territory, with particular<br />

reference to birds. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 23: 1-43.<br />

SCHI0TZ, A. 1975: The Treefrogs <strong>of</strong> Eastern Africa. Steenstrupia, Copenhagen, Denmark.<br />

232 pp.<br />

SCHI0TZ, A. 1999: Treefrogs <strong>of</strong> Africa. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Mein, Germany. 350<br />

PP-<br />

SCHI0TZ, A. & Westergaard, M. M. 2000: Notes on some Hyperolius (Anura: Hyperoliidae)


108 BJOla 3 1-2, 2002 MENEGON & SALVIDIO<br />

from Tanzania, with supplementary information on two recently described<br />

species. Steenstrupia 25: 1-9<br />

WESTEGAARD, M. M., BRESCIANI, J. & BUDTZ, P. E. 2000: Structural aspects <strong>of</strong> white spots<br />

on dorsal skin <strong>of</strong> Hyperolius kihangensis (Amphibia: Hyperoliidae). African<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Herpetology 4: 73-77.


NAGY JOGER, GUICKING & WINK 3/1-2, 2OO2 109<br />

Phylogeography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Whip Snake Coluber (Hierophis)<br />

viridiflavus as inferred from<br />

nucleotide sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

mitochondrial cytochrome b gene<br />

and ISSR genomic fingerprinting<br />

Zoltan Tamas NAGY1, Ulrich JOGER2, Daniela<br />

GUICKING1 & Michael WINK1<br />

1lnstitut fur Pharmazie und Molekulare Biotehnolgie, Universitat Heidelberg, Im<br />

Neuenheimer Feld 364, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany<br />

2Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Zoologische Abteilung, Friedensplatz 1, D-<br />

64283 Darmstadt, Germany<br />

Abstract<br />

The intraspecific phylogeography <strong>of</strong> European Whip Snake Coluber (Hierophis) viridiflavus<br />

was reconstructed using complete sequences (1117 bp) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> protein-coding<br />

mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. C. (H.) gemonensis (Laurenti) and C. (H.) caspius<br />

Gmelin were used as outgroups. Additionally, a microsatellite-based genomic fingerprint<br />

method, ISSR, was employed to check for gene flow between populations. Two clearly<br />

different genetic clades could be identified within European Whip Snake, a western one<br />

occurring in France, Switzerland and Italy west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apennines, and an eastern one<br />

found in Croatia, eastern and sou<strong>the</strong>rn Italy. The latter one could be fur<strong>the</strong>r subdivided<br />

into three subgroups, two <strong>of</strong> which occur in sou<strong>the</strong>rnmost Italy only (sou<strong>the</strong>rn Calabria<br />

and Sicily). These two distinct entities were probably formed during a long continuous<br />

settlement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Whip Snake in <strong>the</strong>se climatically favourable areas, whereas<br />

<strong>the</strong> more nor<strong>the</strong>rn populations experienced enormous shrinking <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ranges during<br />

cold periods in <strong>the</strong> Pleistocene. Potential glacial refuge areas are discussed.<br />

Key words: European Whip Snake, Coluber (Hierophis) viridiflavus, phylogeography<br />

Received 16 November 2001; accepted 5 February 2002


110 >ta 3/1-2, 2002 NAGY ,JOGER, GUICKING & WINK<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The taxonomy and systematics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

European Whip Snake, Coluber<br />

(Hierophis) viridiflavus Lacepede, 1789,<br />

and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r species <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus<br />

Coluber (sensu lato), have been intensively<br />

debated in <strong>the</strong> last centuries.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> European whip snake exists<br />

exclusively in Europe (Heimes 1993,<br />

Naulleau 1997), it shows remarkable<br />

morphological variation. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

characteristics can change from population<br />

to population (Schatti & Vanni<br />

1986), and <strong>the</strong>refore a multitude <strong>of</strong> morphological<br />

forms (insular and colour<br />

forms first <strong>of</strong> all) at species and subspecies<br />

levels have been reported in <strong>the</strong><br />

literature (Suckow 1798, Bonaparte<br />

1833, De Betta 1874, Boulenger 1893,<br />

Mertens & Muller 1928, Mertens &<br />

Wermuth 1960, Kramer 1971,<br />

Capolongo 1984, etc.). While Bruno<br />

(1975 & 1980) considers that two separate<br />

taxa ("viridiflavus" and "carbonarius"<br />

- on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> melanism) at species<br />

level might be possible, Schatti & Vanni<br />

(1986) among o<strong>the</strong>rs question <strong>the</strong> existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> subspecies - due to lack <strong>of</strong> evidence<br />

in pholidotic and hemipenis-morphological<br />

data. The occurence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Table 1. Tissue samples included in <strong>the</strong> present study.<br />

* - no proper data available<br />

Sample Species Country <strong>of</strong> origin<br />

P7 (1) C. (Hjviridifloms Croatia<br />

J19(5) " France<br />

J36(3) " Italy<br />

J39(5) " France<br />

MO (5)<br />

DOS (7)<br />

DG9(7)<br />

DG16(9)<br />

DG17


NAGY JOGER, GUICKING & WINK Biota 3/i-a, 2002 111<br />

Figure 1. Map with localities <strong>of</strong> specimens used for <strong>the</strong> analysis.<br />

Switzerland, see Table 1 and Figure 1 for<br />

details). In most cases a blood sample<br />

was taken from <strong>the</strong> tail <strong>of</strong> living specimens<br />

at <strong>the</strong> capture site (Joger & Lenk<br />

1997); in addition, different tissue samples<br />

were taken (a small piece <strong>of</strong> liver,<br />

heart, or tail) from recently killed animals<br />

(snakes that were run over by cars). The<br />

distribution area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European whip<br />

snake (Heimes 1993, Naulleau 1997) was<br />

more or less covered by sampling - with<br />

<strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Western islands <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Mediterranean Sea, such as Corsica,<br />

Sardinia etc. Samples from <strong>the</strong> two closely<br />

related species (Schatti 1988): Coluber<br />

(Hierophis) gemonensis (Laurenti, 1768)<br />

and Coluber (Hierophis) caspius (Gmelin,<br />

1789), were analyzed as outgroups.<br />

2. Isolation <strong>of</strong> DMA<br />

Tissue samples were stored until processing<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r in 80% ethanol or in EDTA<br />

buffer (Arctander 1988). The isolation <strong>of</strong><br />

total genomic DMA was carried out with<br />

proteinase K digestion, followed by<br />

cleaning steps with phenol-chlor<strong>of</strong>orm<br />

and guanidine-thiocyanate (Sambrook et<br />

al. 1989). The extracted DNA was dissolved<br />

and stored in Tris-EDTA (10 mM<br />

Tris and 1mM EDTA).<br />

3. PCR and nucleotide sequencing<br />

The whole cytb gene was amplified with<br />

polymerase chain reaction in an end volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> 50 ul. PCR primers are listed in<br />

Table 2. PCR was carried out under standard<br />

conditions: initial denaturating (4<br />

min at 94°C), 31-33 cycles with denaturating<br />

(45 s, 94°C), elongation (2 min,<br />

72°C) and annealing step (50 s, 41-<br />

45°C), followed by a final elongation step<br />

for 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were<br />

stored at 4°C, and were directly used as<br />

templates in a cycle sequencing reaction<br />

(Lenk et al. 1999). Typical conditions<br />

were: 3 min at 94°C, 26 cycles with<br />

denaturating (30 s, 94°C) and annealing<br />

and elongation step (45 s, 60°C). The<br />

sequencing products were analyzed in an<br />

automated sequencer ALFExpress II<br />

(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).<br />

Sequences were checked for errors and


112 oiola 3/1-2,2002 NAGY rJOGERr GUICKING & WINK<br />

Table 2. Primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing (cy: primer used in cycle<br />

sequencing only).<br />

Primer<br />

L14724<br />

smiA (L-14S46)<br />

mtE (H-15556)<br />

smtF (H-16060)<br />

L-15570cy<br />

H-15305cy<br />

Source<br />

Meyer eial. (1990)<br />

after Kocher et al. ( 1989),<br />

Leak &Wink (1997)<br />

Lenketal. (2001)<br />

modified after Wink (1995)<br />

This study<br />

This study<br />

aligned manually.<br />

The statistical analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nucleotide<br />

sequences were carried out with <strong>the</strong><br />

PAUP* 4.0b8 (Sw<strong>of</strong>ford 2001) programme<br />

package using maximum parsimony<br />

method with heuristic search and<br />

bootstrap analysis.<br />

4. ISSR-PCR fingerprinting<br />

ISSR (Inter simple sequence repeat)<br />

genomic fingerprinting was performed to<br />

verify results obtained from mitochondrial<br />

cytochrome b sequences and to evaluate<br />

potential hybridisation. ISSR-PCR<br />

uses single primers designed from short<br />

tandem repeats to amplify stretches <strong>of</strong><br />

DNA between adjacent microsatellites.<br />

Given that microsatellites are scattered<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> genome (Tautz & Renz<br />

1984) and in such density that adjacent<br />

microsatellites lie within <strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> Taq<br />

polymerase processing, during ISSR-PCR<br />

a large number <strong>of</strong> fragments is generated.<br />

Once separated on polyacrylamide<br />

gel, ISSR-PCR products appear as polymorphic<br />

multiband fingerprints.<br />

Five ISSR-primers that are known to generate<br />

polymorphic fingerprints in several<br />

vertebrate taxa were tested under varying<br />

PCR conditions on Coluber<br />

(Hierophis) samples. (CA)io- and<br />

(GACA)4-primers gave most useful<br />

results. The reactions were carried out<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> protocol <strong>of</strong> Wink et al.<br />

Sequence (S'-3')<br />

CGA AGC TTG ATA TGA AAA ACC ATC<br />

CAA CAT CTC AGC ATG ATG AAA CTT CG<br />

AAT AGG AAG TAT CAT TCT GGT TTG AT<br />

TCA GTT TTTGGT TTA CAA GAC CAA TG<br />

GAY AAA ATC CCA TTY CAC CC<br />

AAT GAT ATT TGT CCT CAT GG<br />

(2000). In a PCR volume <strong>of</strong> 25 ul, 50-100<br />

ng <strong>of</strong> total DNA were used as template,<br />

plus 6 pmol (GACA)4 or 20 pmol (CA)io<br />

primer, 1,5 mM MgCb, 0,1 mM <strong>of</strong> dCTP,<br />

dGTP, and dTTP, 0,045 mM dATP, 1 uCi<br />

33P-alpha-dATP, 2,5 ul 10x amplification<br />

buffer and 1 unit Taq polymerase<br />

(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). PCR<br />

programmes were set for 5 min at 94°C,<br />

followed by 26 cycles <strong>of</strong> 30 s at 94°C, 20<br />

s at annealing-temperature, and 50 s at<br />

72°C. After completion, <strong>the</strong> temperature<br />

was set to 72°C for 5 min and <strong>the</strong>n lowered<br />

to 4°C for fur<strong>the</strong>r storage. Optimal<br />

annealing-temperatures, as found out by<br />

a 2°C temperature gradient PCR (40°C-<br />

60°C), were 40°C for (CA)io-primer and<br />

55°C for (GACA)4-primer. PCR products<br />

were separated on a denaturing Sequagel<br />

matrix at 65 W for 4 h and visualised by<br />

autoradiography. Fingerprint patterns<br />

were evaluated visually.<br />

RESULTS<br />

1. Analysis <strong>of</strong> cytochrome b sequences<br />

The complete mitochondrial gene cytb<br />

(1117 base pairs) was amplified from 24<br />

samples, including <strong>the</strong> outgroups.<br />

The phylogeographic analysis <strong>of</strong> Coluber<br />

(Hierophis) viridiflavus revealed four haplotype<br />

groups in two main clades, which<br />

are clearly separated genetically and by<br />

geographic areas (Figure 2). These clades<br />

are supported with significant bootstrap


NAGY ,JOGERr GUICKING & WINK 3/1-2, 2002 113<br />

values (96-100%).<br />

Among our sequences 57 variable<br />

nucleotides (5.10% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cytb gene,<br />

excluding outgroups) were found (Figure<br />

3); <strong>the</strong> two main groups are separated by<br />

- at least - 2.95% (33 different<br />

nucleotides). They represent a Western<br />

and an Eastern clade. The Western group<br />

(clade W in Figure 2) includes animals<br />

from France, Switzerland and Italy west<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apennines (i.e. Tuscany province<br />

and Riviera coast). This group possesses a<br />

quite uniform haplotype - only single<br />

nucleotide mutation sites were detected -<br />

which appears to be monomorphic without<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r subdivisions.<br />

The Eastern group is divided into fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

subgroups: 1. Italy, east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apennines<br />

and <strong>the</strong> island Krk (clade E on Figure 2),<br />

2. sou<strong>the</strong>rn Calabria, and 3. Sicily (both<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m represented in clade S). At <strong>the</strong><br />

Eastern border <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution area live<br />

- sympatrically with C. (H.) gemonensis -<br />

<strong>the</strong> Slovenian and Croatian populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> C. (H.) viridiflavus. Our sample from<br />

<strong>the</strong> island Krk shows <strong>the</strong> closest relationship<br />

with <strong>the</strong> eastern Italian samples. In<br />

contrast, <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn (South-Eastern)<br />

populations belong to a clearly separated<br />

group: <strong>the</strong> South Calabrian and Sicilian<br />

populations differ not only from <strong>the</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>astern ones, but also from each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

2. ISSR-PCR patterns<br />

ISSR-primers (GACA)4 and (CA)io produced<br />

informative fingerprints with several<br />

polymorphic bands. ISSR pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

were more diverse with <strong>the</strong> (GACA)4primer<br />

(Figure 4) than with <strong>the</strong> (CA)ioprimer<br />

(not shown). Both primers generate<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> species-specific bands as<br />

Figure 2. Phylogeny <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cytochrome b gene <strong>of</strong> Coluber (Hierophis) viridiflavus. Strict<br />

consensus tree resulted from maximum parsimony analysis, tree length=251. Bootstrap<br />

proportions >50 (100 replications) are presented.<br />

100<br />

cyt6-MP<br />

100<br />

W<br />

99<br />

Krk, CRO (P7)<br />

Canossa, I (155}<br />

F. Staffora, I (DG77)<br />

T. Platano, I (DG66)<br />

T. Platano, I (DG65)<br />

N-Calabria, I (DG5S}<br />

Torre S. Genaro, 1 (DG22)<br />

Mte St. Angelo, I (DG21)<br />

Lago di Lesina, I (DG17}<br />

Lago di Lesina, 1 (DG16)<br />

Grado, \(t>G9)<br />

Grade, I (DCS;<br />

9gj- Sicily, I (DG38)<br />

63 PL Sicily. I (DG45)<br />

I S-Calabria, S-Cala I (DG53)<br />

Quincy, F (J19)<br />

Canguers, F (Al)<br />

R. L'AIlondon, CH (DG86)<br />

Rapallo, I (DG7I)<br />

Quincy, F (J40)<br />

Quincy, F (J39)<br />

Tuscany, I (J36)<br />

C. (H.) gemonensis, CRO<br />

C. (H.) cospius, OR


114 Biota 3 1-2. 3002 NAGY ,JOCER, GUICKING & WINK<br />

Figure 3. Variable nucleotides <strong>of</strong> C. (H.) viridiflavus samples (cytochrome b gene with<br />

position numbering). E: eastern group; W: western group; Sic: Sicily; Cal: South-<br />

Calabria; var: variable sequences with single nucleotide mutations.<br />

*c<br />

*c<br />

#C<br />

*c_<br />

SC<br />

K<br />

vi<br />

vi<br />

vi<br />

vi<br />

vi<br />

vi<br />

id<br />

id<br />

id<br />

id<br />

id<br />

id<br />

1111<br />

111 1111222233 3344444445 5555666666 7778888999 9990000<br />

2244458122 4569056811 3834566671 3457146889 0261447011 5790467<br />

4527814709 7658487828 0127302577 1929829341 8934366658 5492721<br />

E<br />

E var<br />

E~Sic<br />

E Cal<br />

W<br />

W<br />

var<br />

GCACACGCGA TTTGGCTCGG<br />

. . .G.TRT AT.T . .AC<br />

. . .G. . .TA- .C...A.C. . .AC<br />

ATGGG.A. .G<br />

ATGGG.A.<br />

TGTTATAGTC<br />

R<br />

GGACCAATTC<br />

Y W<br />

T.G.<br />

G.C<br />

ACGAGGCAAT ATGAGTC<br />

D<br />

Y<br />

. . . GA. . . . . AG . . .<br />

. G.A .C.<br />

. .CAA.C.AA CA.CGA.AC. AA.T CT GT . .AA.G.C ... .A.T<br />

G Y. CAA.C.AA CA.CGA.AC . AA.T. . CT . . GT. .AAYGMC . . . .A.T<br />

... . irrn n/-n ,. . , ...<br />

Figure 4. ISSR PCR fingerprint made with<br />

, ° ,-.,„ . .. , , , , . .,<br />

(GACA)4 primer. See text for details.<br />

'<br />

well as several group-specific bands<br />

.... . ,. ° £, K , . ,<br />

(Figure 4. indicated with numbers) that<br />

s . ,' ,.„<br />

support <strong>the</strong> differentiation into a western<br />

(Figure 4, bands No. 1, 2, 3, 4) and an<br />

eastern clade (bands No. 5: several bands<br />

in a specific size range, to a certain extent<br />

also No. 6, 7). Western and eastern<br />

clades, as suggested by ISSR-analysis,<br />

conform to those suggested by<br />

cytochrome b sequences.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, ISSR patterns suggest a<br />

\ f--•- * hybrid status for some samples. This is<br />

evident in samples J55 and DG77, both<br />

from Northwestern Italy. According to<br />

i cytochrome b sequences, both samples<br />

7 belong to <strong>the</strong> eastern clade, whereas<br />

_ _. ,. _^__ „ ISSR-pr<strong>of</strong>iles show both eastern clade<br />

"* specific bands (Figure 4, no. 5) as well as<br />

• "" rzim;^_ 6 western clade specific bands (in sample<br />

•^^V^"-—-^35— 4 DG77 No 2 and 3^ in samp|e J55 No 1;<br />

^"^•"•-^--"""^ '-. ' 2, and 3). These results suggest recent<br />

gene flow between <strong>the</strong> eastern and western<br />

clade in Northwestern Italy.<br />

The separation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sicilian and sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Caiabrian samples (DG38, DG45 and<br />

DG53, respectively) from <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

eastern clade is less evident according to<br />

*•==»* ~ ISSR pr<strong>of</strong>iles than it is according to<br />

cytochrome b sequences. The band pattern<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sicilian sample DG45 may<br />

show genetic introgression from <strong>the</strong><br />

west, too (Figure 4, bands No. 2, 3).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The sequence analysis (confirmed by


NAGY ,JOGER, GUICKING & WINK Biota 3/i-a, 2002 115<br />

ISSR-PCR fingerprinting) unambiguously<br />

shows that <strong>the</strong>re are discrete phylogeographic<br />

units within <strong>the</strong> distribution range<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Whip Snake. Spatial and<br />

historic factors might be responsible for<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir isolation.<br />

Two bigger groups are apparently separated<br />

on <strong>the</strong> genetic level: The Western<br />

and Eastern populations are divided by<br />

<strong>the</strong> mountain ranges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alps and <strong>the</strong><br />

Apennines acting as strict geographic<br />

barriers (Figure 1). Apparently this species<br />

does not cross mountain ranges easily<br />

(though it has been reported from elevations<br />

above 1,800 m [Heimes 1993]).<br />

Results based on cytb sequences support<br />

<strong>the</strong> conclusion that <strong>the</strong> Western group<br />

might be monotypic; however, no samples<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Western Mediterranean<br />

islands (see above), or from <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

border <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution zone (e.g.<br />

Luxembourg) were available for our<br />

research. An important aspect is that <strong>the</strong><br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> this colubrid species is continuous<br />

between France and <strong>the</strong> Western<br />

foot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apennines; it includes a recent<br />

connection along <strong>the</strong> narrow coastal strip<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cote d'Azur and Riviera di Ponente.<br />

The mitochondria! sequences confirm a<br />

close relationship between Coluber<br />

(Hierophis) gemonensis and Coluber<br />

(Hierophis) viridiflavus. This result suggests<br />

also a Western-Eastern divergence:<br />

Coluber (Hierophis) viridiflavus is representative<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central Mediterranean,<br />

while Coluber (Hierophis) gemonensis <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> eastern Mediterranean, respectively.<br />

In addition, it is also possible that both <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m share a common ancestor with C.<br />

(H.) caspius and C. (H.) jugularis, as<br />

Schatti (1988) believes.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> sister species are distributed in <strong>the</strong><br />

Balkans, it is justified to assume <strong>the</strong> geographic<br />

origin <strong>of</strong> C. (H.) viridiflavus at <strong>the</strong><br />

eastern edge <strong>of</strong> its distribution range.<br />

Many eastern European species that<br />

reach Italy do not cross <strong>the</strong> Apennines; a<br />

vertebrate example is <strong>the</strong> Hooded Crow<br />

Corvus corone comix. In <strong>the</strong> turtle Emys<br />

orbicularis, genetically different subspecies<br />

inhabit eastern and western Italy<br />

(Lenketal. 1999).<br />

The population living on Krk island - at<br />

<strong>the</strong> eastern border <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution<br />

zone - shows a petty divergence compared<br />

to Italian populations which belong<br />

to <strong>the</strong> eastern group. A continuous presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species during <strong>the</strong> Pleistocene<br />

is, however, unlikely in this nor<strong>the</strong>rn part<br />

<strong>of</strong> its range. Therefore it is probably<br />

derived from a sou<strong>the</strong>rn Italian stock (The<br />

Balkans' own glacial refugia were probably<br />

occupied by C. (H.) gemonensis).<br />

North-South movements <strong>of</strong> such reptiles<br />

along <strong>the</strong> coasts <strong>of</strong> Italy are unhindered.<br />

The existence <strong>of</strong> South(east)ern subgroup^)<br />

is, however, again paralleled by<br />

Emys orbicularis (Lenk et al. 1999) as well<br />

as by <strong>the</strong> snakes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Elaphe longissima<br />

complex (Lenk & Wuster 1999). Such<br />

common zoogeographical patterns can<br />

be traced back to <strong>the</strong> glacial zoogeographic<br />

history in all likelihood (Lenk et<br />

al. 1999, Schatti 1988).<br />

The sou<strong>the</strong>rn Italian and Sicilian regions<br />

could have functioned as refugia during<br />

cold periods <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pleistocene. A refuge<br />

for <strong>the</strong> eastern group could have been at<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gulf <strong>of</strong> Taranto and in Calabria. Our<br />

two Calabrian samples belong to slightly<br />

different haplotypes: DG53 ("South"),<br />

and DG55 ("North"), respectively. Both<br />

are different from <strong>the</strong> Sicilian sample. This<br />

variation could be explained by a longer<br />

continuous evolutionary history in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

possible glacial refuges. A possible refuge<br />

for <strong>the</strong> western group could have been in<br />

<strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong> Naples-Salerno. However,<br />

we could not check samples from that<br />

area.<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn populations<br />

could also continue unhindered during<br />

glacial periods. This may have resulted<br />

in higher genetic differences, in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

words, in a mosaic <strong>of</strong> genetically different<br />

forms. A few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se forms (in fact only


116 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 NACY ,JOGER, GUICKING & WINK<br />

one on each side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apennines)<br />

would have used <strong>the</strong> climatically favorable<br />

interglacials to spread into more<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn areas. Pleistocene fossils attributed<br />

to C. (H.) viridiflavus have been<br />

found in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Germany and Austria;<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Pliocene, this species reached <strong>the</strong><br />

territories <strong>of</strong> today's Czech Republic and<br />

Poland (Ivanov 1997, Schatti 1988).<br />

Climatic conditions during <strong>the</strong> glacial<br />

periods forced it to retreat into <strong>the</strong> above<br />

named refuges in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Italy. After <strong>the</strong><br />

last glacial period, re-immigration to <strong>the</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn Adriatic region (eastern group)<br />

as well as to France and Belgium (western<br />

group) would have happened in a comparatively<br />

short time, which may not<br />

have allowed a significant genetic differentiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn populations to<br />

occur.<br />

ISSR-PCR has useful applications for<br />

examining group specificity and<br />

hybridization events. Because <strong>of</strong> its<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> nuclear genetic rearrangements,<br />

it provides a valuable complement<br />

to data obtained from <strong>the</strong> maternally<br />

inherited mitochondrial genome. It is<br />

especially powerful in detecting<br />

hybridization events (Wink et al. 2000).<br />

In our study, it allowed us to re-examine<br />

<strong>the</strong> separation <strong>of</strong> Coluber (Hierophis)<br />

viridiflavus samples into a western and an<br />

eastern clade, which is strongly supported<br />

by ISSR-analysis, as well as suggesting a<br />

gene flow between both groups in<br />

Northwestern Italy. However, ISSR-fingerprints<br />

provided less evidence for <strong>the</strong><br />

separation <strong>of</strong> Sicilian and South Calabrian<br />

samples from o<strong>the</strong>r eastern clade samples<br />

than is suggested by cytochrome b<br />

sequence data.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evident, but not complete,<br />

genetic isolation, we recommend once<br />

more <strong>the</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> two subspecies<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European whip snake sensu<br />

Mertens & Wermuth (1960). If fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

studies in <strong>the</strong> contact zones <strong>of</strong> both subspecies<br />

prove that an intrinsic genetic<br />

barrier exists, <strong>the</strong> two main clades could<br />

even be raised to species level (see Joger<br />

et al. 1998). The applicable name for <strong>the</strong><br />

western populations is Coluber<br />

(Hierophis) viridiflavus viridiflavus<br />

Lacepede, 1789 (terra typica: sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

France). The Eastern stocks were traditionally<br />

assigned to <strong>the</strong> subspecies<br />

Coluber (Hierophis) viridiflavus carbonarius<br />

Bonaparte 1833 (nomen conservandum,<br />

terra typica restricta Mertens &<br />

Muller 1928: Monti Euganei, Padua,<br />

Italy); however, <strong>the</strong> subspecific name has<br />

no more (or has far less) ethymological<br />

importance (an allusion to <strong>the</strong> melanism).<br />

The border between both subspecies is<br />

<strong>the</strong> Apennines. The South Italian populations<br />

are less differentiated within <strong>the</strong><br />

Eastern group (1.16% [13 different<br />

nucleotides] and 1.34% [15] by<br />

Calabrian and Sicilian samples, respectively,<br />

at cytb level), so in our view taxonomical<br />

consequences are not justified.<br />

This, however, would mean that older<br />

names apply to <strong>the</strong> eastern subspecies:<br />

Coluber (Hierophis) pr<strong>of</strong>ulax Costa, 1828<br />

(terra typica Aspromonte, sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Calabria) or C. (H.) xanthurus<br />

Rafinesque-Schmaltz, 1810 (terra typica<br />

Sicily). An even older name is C. (H.) sardus<br />

Suckow 1798 (Terra typica Sardinia).<br />

As we have not studied Sardinian material,<br />

we cannot decide to which form it<br />

applies. In all cases, <strong>the</strong> morphology <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> European whip snake has to be studied<br />

in more detail in order to find reliable<br />

characters to define subspecies.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We would like to thank Toni Amann, Anna Hundsdorfer, Luc Legal, Peter Lenk and<br />

Werner Mayer for providing tissue samples, as well as Edoardo Razzetti for helpful comments.<br />

This study was financially funded by DAAD (research scholarship for <strong>the</strong> first<br />

author) and DFG (Jo-134-7 and Wi-719/18).


NAGY JOGER, GUICKING & WINK Biota 3/1-2, 2002 117<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ARCTANDER, P. 1988: Comparative studies <strong>of</strong> avian DNA by restriction fragment polymorphism<br />

analysis. J. Ornithol. 129: 205-216.<br />

BONAPARTE, C.L. 1833: Iconografia della fauna Italica (1832-1841). ll(5), Roma. Tipogr.<br />

Salviucci. iv+264 pp., 54 pis.<br />

BOULENGER, G.A. 1893: Catalogue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> snakes in <strong>the</strong> British Museum, I., London. Brit.<br />

Mus. (Nat. Hist), 448 pp., 28 pis.<br />

BRUNO, S. 1975: Note riassuntive sull'erpet<strong>of</strong>auna dell'isola di Montecristo (Archipelago<br />

Toscano). Studi sulla fauna erpetologica italiana, XX. Lav. Soc. ital. Biogeogr. (n.s.)<br />

V: 98 pp., 45 figs.<br />

BRUNO, S. 1980:1 serpenti del Veneto. I. A/lorfologia, tassonomia, geonemia. Lav. Soc. ven.<br />

Sci. nat., 5 (suppl.): 70 pp.<br />

CAPOLONGO, D. 1984: Note sull'erpet<strong>of</strong>auna pugliese. Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Milano civ.<br />

Stor. nat. Milano 125: 189-200.<br />

DE BETTA, E. 1874: Fauna d'ltalia. In: Parte V, Rettili ed Anfibi. Vallardi, R, Ed, Milano.<br />

HEIMES, P. 1993: Coluber viridiflavus Lacepede, 1789 - Gelbgriine Zornnatter. In: Bohme,<br />

W. (ed.): Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, Vol. 3/I. Wiesbaden:<br />

177-198.<br />

IVANOV, M. 1997: Vlvoj kenozoicke hadi fauny Evropy. In: Hladilove, S. (ed.): Dynamika<br />

vztahu marinnfho a kontinentalm'ho prostredi. Brno: 59-91.<br />

JOGER, U. & LENK, P. 1997: Entnahme und Behandlung von Blutproben fur molekulargenetische<br />

Untersuchungen in der Feldherpetologie. In: Henle, K. & Veith, M.<br />

(eds): Naturschutzrelevante Methoden der Feldherpetologie. Mertensiella,<br />

Rheinbach 7: 329-340.<br />

KOCHER, T.D., THOMAS, W.K., MEYER, A., EDWARDS, S.W., PAABO, S., VILLABLANCA,<br />

F.X. & WILSON, A.C. 1989: Dynamics <strong>of</strong> mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals:<br />

Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. PNAS 86: 6196-<br />

6200.<br />

KRAMER, E. 1971: Revalidierte und neue Rassen der europaischen Schlangenfauna. Lav.<br />

Soc. ital. Biogeogr. (n.s.) I (1970): 667-675.<br />

LENK, P., FRITZ, U., JOGER, U. & WINK, M. 1999: Mitochondrial phylogeography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

European pond turtle, Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus 1758). Mol. Ecol. 8:1911-1922.<br />

LENK, P., KALYABINA, S., WINK, M. & JOGER, U. 2001: Evolutionary relationships among<br />

<strong>the</strong> true vipers (Reptilia: Viperidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences.<br />

Mol. Phyl. Evol. 19: 94-104.<br />

LENK, P. & WINK, M. 1997: A RNA/RNA heteroduplex cleavage analysis to detect rare<br />

mutations in populations. Mol. Ecol. 6: 687-690.<br />

LENK, P. & WUSTER, W. 1999: A multivariate approach to <strong>the</strong> systematics <strong>of</strong> Italian rat<br />

snakes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Elaphe longissima complex (Reptilia: Colubridae): Revalidation <strong>of</strong><br />

Camerano's Callopeltis longissimus var. lineata. Herpetol. J. 9: 153-162.<br />

MERTENS, R. & MULLER, L. 1928: Liste der Amphibien und Reptilien Europas. Abh. senckb.<br />

naturf. Ges. 41: 1-62.<br />

MERTENS, R. & WERMUTH, H. 1960: Die Amphibien und Reptilien Europas (Dritte Liste).<br />

Frankfurt am Main, 264 pp.<br />

MEYER, A., KOCHER, T.D., BASASIBWAKI, P. & WILSON, A.C. 1990: Monophyletic origin<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lake Victoria cichlid fishes suggested by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Nature<br />

347: 550-553.<br />

NAGY, Z.T. & KORS6S, Z. 2001: Morphological studies on grass snakes, Natrix natrix (L.) in<br />

a Hungarian population. In: Lymberakis, P., Valakos, E., Pafilis, P. & Mylonas, M.<br />

(eds): Herpetologia Candiana, S.E.H., Irakleio, 2001: 107-114<br />

NAULLEAU, G. 1997: Coluber viridiflavus Lacepede, 1789. In: Case, J.-P. (ed.): Atlas <strong>of</strong>


118 Biota 3/1-2.2002 NAGY ,JOGER, GUICKING & WINK<br />

Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Paris: 342-343.<br />

SAMBROOK, J., FRITSCH, E.F. & MANIATIS, T. 1989: Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory<br />

Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.<br />

SCHATTI, B. 1988: Systematik und Evolution der Schlangengattung Hierophis Fitzinger,<br />

1843 (Reptilia, Serpentes). Dissertation, Zurich.<br />

SCHATTI, B. & VANNI, S. 1986: Intraspecific variation in Coluber viridiflavus Lacepede,<br />

1789, and validity <strong>of</strong> its subspecies (Reptilia, Serpentes, Colubridae). Revue<br />

suisseZool. 93:219-232.<br />

SUCKOW, G.A. 1798: Anfangsgrunde der <strong>the</strong>oretischen und angewandten<br />

Naturgeschichte der Thiere. Leipzig, Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.<br />

SWOFFORD, D.L. 2001: PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Methods), Version 4.0b8. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.<br />

TAUTZ, D. & RENZ, M. 1984: Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components <strong>of</strong><br />

eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 4127-4138.<br />

WINK, M. 1995: Phylogeny <strong>of</strong> Old and New World vultures (Aves: Accipitridae and<br />

Cathartidae). Inferred from nucleotide sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mitochondrial<br />

cytochrome b gene. Z. Naturforsch. Journal <strong>of</strong> Bioscience 50c: 868-882.<br />

WINK, M., GUICKING, D. & FRITZ, U. 2000: Molecular evidence for hybrid origin <strong>of</strong><br />

Mauremys iversoni Pritchard et McCord, 1991, and Mauremys pritchardi<br />

McCord, 1997 (Reptilia: Testudines: Bataguridae). Zool. Abh. Mus. Tierkd.<br />

Dresden 51: 41-49.


1<br />

PASTOREILI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI Biota 3/1-2. 2002 119<br />

Seasonal activity and spatial<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes<br />

italicus population in a natural<br />

cave<br />

Christian PASTORELLI1, Paolo LAGHI2 & Dino<br />

SCARAVELLI3<br />

Y Cerchia di S. Egidio 2205, 47023 Cesena (FC), Italy<br />

E-mail: pastorellic@libero.it<br />

2v. Bruno C. Garibaldi 22, 47100 Forli, Italy<br />

E-mail: spelerpes@libero.it<br />

3Riserva Naturale Orientata e Museo di Onferno, p. Roma 1, 47855 Gemmano (RN),<br />

Italy<br />

E-mail: rnoonf@tin.it<br />

Abstract<br />

The biology <strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes italicus population inhabiting <strong>the</strong> natural cave "Grotta<br />

del Tritone" has been studied since 1998. The cave opens at 810 m a.s.l. and it is located<br />

in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Apennine slope (Forli-Cesena province, Emilia-Romagna region,<br />

Italy). Data on environmental parameters (inside and outside temperature, relative<br />

humidity and light intensity) and activity <strong>of</strong> Speleomantes italicus (number, size and<br />

location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individuals) have been collected from February 1999 to January 2001 by<br />

monthly surveys. The hypogean observable activity <strong>of</strong> 5. italicus in <strong>the</strong> study site<br />

showed a strong seasonal pattern, with <strong>the</strong> highest number <strong>of</strong> specimens in late spring<br />

(May) and early fall (September). The authors also analysed seasonal variation <strong>of</strong> spatial<br />

distribution as a function <strong>of</strong> temperature, humidity and light intensity. Salamanders<br />

were observed only in <strong>the</strong> first part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cave (up to about 25 meters from <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance); <strong>the</strong> animals also seemed to prefer <strong>the</strong> lighted parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cave, while juveniles<br />

were found at a shorter distance from <strong>the</strong> entrance than adults. During summer,<br />

salamanders were active deeper in <strong>the</strong> cavity than in fall or spring, and in winter <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were found near <strong>the</strong> entrance and sometimes outside. Superficial activity was scarce<br />

and close to cave entrance.<br />

Key words: population ecology, seasonal activity, spatial distribution, Plethodontidae,<br />

Speleomantes italicus<br />

Received 3 August 2002; accepted 26 September 2002


120 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

European Plethodontid salamanders <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> genus Speleomantes are <strong>full</strong>y terrestrial<br />

and live in moist and cool environments<br />

such as caves and soil interstices.<br />

They are found from south-eastern<br />

France to central Italy and on <strong>the</strong> island<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sardinia (Lanza et al. 1995). To date,<br />

seven species (three continental and four<br />

insular) and one insular subspecies <strong>of</strong><br />

Speleomantes have been recognised on<br />

<strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> morphological and genetic<br />

data (Lanza et al. 1986, 1995, 2001,<br />

Nascetti et al. 1996). Notwithstanding<br />

<strong>the</strong> great interest that this genus holds,<br />

studies on eco-ethology, population<br />

dynamics and life history <strong>of</strong><br />

Speleomantes started only recently and<br />

regarded few species (Cimmaruta et al.<br />

1999, Mutz 1998, Pastorelli et al. 2001,<br />

Salvidio 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993a,<br />

1993b, 1996, 1998; Salvidio et al. 1994,<br />

Voesenek et al. 1987).<br />

Speleomantes italicus is a species endemic<br />

to <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn and central Apennines<br />

(Lanza et al. 1995) and is found in natural<br />

and artificial caves and in interstitial<br />

habitats.<br />

The biology <strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes italicus<br />

population inhabiting a natural cave in<br />

<strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Apennines has been studied<br />

since 1998 (Pastorelli et al. 2001). This<br />

paper reports data about seasonal activity<br />

and spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salamanders<br />

as a function <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

parameters studied from February 1999<br />

to January 2001.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The study site is a natural cave called<br />

"Grotta del Tritone" [43°53'52" N -<br />

0°29'02"W (Rome)] located on <strong>the</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn Apennine slope (Forli-Cesena<br />

province, Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy).<br />

The cave opens north-eastward at 810 m.<br />

a.s.l., in marl and sandstones. It reaches a<br />

total extension <strong>of</strong> about 50 meters, on a<br />

sub-horizontal horizon. (Figure 1). The<br />

dominant vegetation around <strong>the</strong> study<br />

site is oak-tree woodland, mainly composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> coppices <strong>of</strong> Quercus cerris and<br />

Ostrya carpinifolia with a poor leaf soil.<br />

Since September 1998 <strong>the</strong> study site was<br />

sampled monthly (except June 1999) and<br />

records included individual data as well as<br />

environmental data.<br />

Salamanders were searched for by two<br />

persons outside <strong>the</strong> cave near its<br />

Figure 1. The cave "Grotta del Tritone". On <strong>the</strong> left <strong>the</strong> black circle indicates <strong>the</strong> location<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study site in Italy and in grey is pointed out Speleomantes italicus range.<br />

GROTTA DHL TRiTONE


PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI Biota 3 1-2, 2OO2 121<br />

entrance, and inside on <strong>the</strong> walls and<br />

floor and, where possible, on <strong>the</strong> cave<br />

vault for about one hour per session. For<br />

each specimen captured <strong>the</strong> following<br />

data were recorded: date and hour <strong>of</strong><br />

observation, sex, distance from cave<br />

entrance and from cave floor (in meters).<br />

All specimens with a body length wider<br />

than <strong>the</strong> smallest male (41 mm) with a<br />

mental body gland (cf. Lanza 1959) were<br />

considered to be adult salamanders.<br />

Environmental data include wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions,<br />

temperatures and relative humidity.<br />

The latter two were measured at <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance (Te1, URe1) and at <strong>the</strong> following<br />

distances from it: 5 meters outside <strong>the</strong><br />

cave (Te2, URe2) and 7 (Ti1, URi1), 15<br />

012, URi2) and 21 metres (Ti3, URi3)<br />

inside. Two minimum-maximum mercury<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmometers were placed to record temperatures<br />

between consecutive samples,<br />

respectively at Te2 and Ti1 sampling locations.<br />

Finally, in July 1999, March, June<br />

and December 2000 maximum light<br />

intensity was recorded for each linear<br />

meter inside <strong>the</strong> cave to <strong>the</strong> point at<br />

which light reached <strong>the</strong> 0.0 lux instrumental<br />

value.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Environmental parameters<br />

During <strong>the</strong> study period, <strong>the</strong> mean minimum<br />

temperature outside <strong>the</strong> cave varied<br />

from -11 °C to 15°C, while <strong>the</strong> mean minimum<br />

internal temperature varied from<br />

3°C to 10°C. During <strong>the</strong> same period<br />

maximum temperatures varied from 10°C<br />

to 37°C outside and from 8°C to 11°C<br />

inside. The highest variation was<br />

observed for Te 2 (mean = 13.129; SD =<br />

7.467) followed by Te 1 (mean = 12.000;<br />

SD = 3.949), Ti 3 (mean = 9.574; SD =<br />

1.878), Ti 1 (mean = 8.973; SD = 1.489),<br />

and Ti 2 (mean = 8.914; SD = 1.269).<br />

Inside <strong>the</strong> cave <strong>the</strong> relative humidity varied<br />

from 80% to 100%, while outside it<br />

Figure 2. Light intensity variations recorded inside <strong>the</strong> cave (deep zone)<br />

VD r-- oo<br />

« •— — — — cs cs<br />

Distance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sampling point from <strong>the</strong> entrance (m)<br />

• 12-Mar-OO: overcast sky -02-Jun-OO: clear sky


122 Biota 3/1-2,2002 PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI<br />

fluctuated between 30 % and 100%. The<br />

highest variation was recorded for URe 2<br />

(mean = 68.714; SD = 21.504) followed<br />

by URe 1 (mean = 78.579; SD = 15.222),<br />

URi 3 (mean = 94.389; SD = 4.680), URi<br />

2 (mean = 94.762; SD = 4.230), and URi<br />

1 (mean = 95.143; SD = 3.525).<br />

Light intensity decreased to about 10 lux<br />

at 7 metres inside <strong>the</strong> cave, <strong>the</strong>n it gradually<br />

reached 0.0 lux at 21 m from <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance (Figure 2).<br />

Seasonal activity<br />

The total number <strong>of</strong> salamanders captured<br />

was 204 in <strong>the</strong> year 1999 and 181<br />

in <strong>the</strong> year 2000.<br />

The highest number <strong>of</strong> animals was captured<br />

in May (74 and 45 specimens in<br />

1999 and 2000 respectively) and<br />

September (45 and 36 specimens in 1999<br />

and 2000 respectively). The lowest num-<br />

ber <strong>of</strong> active salamanders was recorded in<br />

December 2000 and January 2001 (only<br />

3 active specimens in both cases) and no<br />

salamanders were found in January 2000.<br />

This activity pattern did not differ significantly<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two years (Mann-<br />

Whitney test T: 135.5 and P: 0.854).<br />

Activity <strong>of</strong> females, males, and both sexes<br />

pooled did not vary meaning<strong>full</strong>y<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two years (Mann-Whitney<br />

test respectively with P>0.5 in all cases).<br />

Salamanders activity was correlated with<br />

environmental parameters recorded during<br />

each sampling session. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

active juveniles, females, males, and<br />

adults was not significantly correlated to<br />

<strong>the</strong> relative humidity recorded inside and<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> cave (Spearman's correlation<br />

coefficient with P > 0.05 in all cases). The<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> active salamanders was<br />

significantly correlated to internal tern-<br />

Figure 3. Regression between number <strong>of</strong> specimens captured and temperature measured<br />

7 meters far from <strong>the</strong> entrance.<br />

8 _ 9 . 1


PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI Biota 3/1-2,2002 123<br />

peratures (Figure 3), except for males, for<br />

which abundance was significantly correlated<br />

with Ti 2 and Ti 3 only (P < 0.05 in<br />

all cases). A meaningful correlation was<br />

also found between <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> active<br />

salamanders and external temperatures<br />

(P< 0.05) except for males (P > 0.05);<br />

juvenile abundance was also not significantly<br />

correlated to Te2 (P > 0.05).<br />

Spatial distribution<br />

Taking into account <strong>the</strong> whole body <strong>of</strong><br />

captures, <strong>the</strong> animals were found at a<br />

mean distance <strong>of</strong> 6.5 m from <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance, and 51.3% <strong>of</strong> captures were<br />

made within <strong>the</strong> first 7 m <strong>of</strong> cave extension.<br />

Only 5 captures (1.4%) were made<br />

1 m outside <strong>the</strong> cave and only one<br />

(0.3%) more than 25 metres inside. This<br />

distribution pattern did not vary qualitatively<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two years.<br />

Juveniles were found at a mean distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3.9 m from <strong>the</strong> entrance, and 88.5%<br />

<strong>of</strong> observations were made within <strong>the</strong><br />

first 7 m. Only 2.3% <strong>of</strong> observations (4<br />

captures) were recorded 1 m outside <strong>the</strong><br />

cave.<br />

The mean distance from <strong>the</strong> entrance <strong>of</strong><br />

adults was 8.6 m; 66.7% <strong>of</strong> observations<br />

were recorded within 4 to 12 m from <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance and only 8.5% were found<br />

within <strong>the</strong> first 4 m from <strong>the</strong> entrance.<br />

Only one adult salamander (0.6%) was<br />

found more than 25 m from <strong>the</strong> entrance<br />

and only one male specimen (0.6%) 1 m<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> cave.<br />

The mean distance from <strong>the</strong> entrance<br />

recorded for females was 8.6 meters,<br />

while it was 8.8 meters for males.<br />

Significant variations were recorded<br />

between female and male distribution in<br />

<strong>the</strong> year 1999 (P < 0.05), but not in 2000<br />

(P > 0.05) or when years were pooled (P<br />

> 0.05). Superficial activity outside <strong>the</strong><br />

cave was observed only in December<br />

1999 and November 2000, close to <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance, when temperatures inside and<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> cave were very similar. There<br />

Figure 4. Seasonal variations <strong>of</strong> spatial distribution. Standard errors are reported.<br />

13,0<br />

12,0<br />

11,0<br />

10,0<br />

9,0<br />

8,0<br />

7,0<br />

6,0<br />

5,0<br />

4,0<br />

3,0<br />

2,0<br />

',0<br />

0,0<br />

Spring Summer FaH Winter<br />

D Juveniles d Females D Males


124 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI<br />

was no significant correlation between<br />

<strong>the</strong> spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> females and<br />

males and light intensity. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> all specimens captured<br />

inside <strong>the</strong> cave was meaning<strong>full</strong>y<br />

correlated to light intensity (Spearman's<br />

correlation coefficient, P < 0.01 in all<br />

cases except for females: P < 0.05).<br />

The highest mean distance from <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance was recorded in summer (7.6<br />

m), followed by fall (6.6 m), spring (6.4<br />

m), and winter (3.9 m) respectively. This<br />

pattern did not show variations between<br />

females and juveniles, while males were<br />

found deeper in <strong>the</strong> cave in spring (Figure<br />

4).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Environmental parameters<br />

Inside <strong>the</strong> study cave, environmental variations<br />

were lower than those recorded<br />

outside; <strong>the</strong>rmal and hygrometric differences<br />

between <strong>the</strong> various sampling<br />

points inside <strong>the</strong> cave were on average<br />

low and generally due to different microhabitat<br />

conditions. During <strong>the</strong> study period,<br />

relative humidity inside <strong>the</strong> cave<br />

remained high throughout <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cave's<br />

exposure, light penetrated only <strong>the</strong> first<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cavity; <strong>the</strong>n its intensity gradually<br />

decreased, becoming 0.0 at 21<br />

meters inside.<br />

Seasonal activity<br />

Speleomantes italicus hypogeal observable<br />

activity showed great variations during<br />

<strong>the</strong> year, with <strong>the</strong> highest number <strong>of</strong><br />

salamanders captured in May and<br />

September and <strong>the</strong> lowest in January and<br />

December. These data are in contrast<br />

with those recorded for Speleomantes<br />

strinatii in an artificial tunnel. In fact, this<br />

latter population was more active in July<br />

and August (Salvidio et al. 1994).<br />

Salamander activity pattern was similar<br />

between years, but in 2000 a smaller<br />

number <strong>of</strong> salamanders was captured.<br />

This could be due to <strong>the</strong> variation in environmental<br />

factors between years, or perhaps<br />

to human disturbance; fur<strong>the</strong>r data<br />

are needed to clarify this observation.<br />

Our data show a direct influence <strong>of</strong> inside<br />

temperatures on salamander activity;<br />

again, <strong>the</strong>se results appear different from<br />

those obtained for S. strinatii, in which<br />

<strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> internal temperatures<br />

seemed to be indirect, as <strong>the</strong> highest correlation<br />

coefficients were obtained for<br />

temperatures recorded outside <strong>the</strong> tunnel<br />

or near its entrance (Salvidio et al. 1994).<br />

Spatial distribution<br />

Plethodontid salamanders are usually<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> twilight tract <strong>of</strong> a cave near<br />

its entrance (Cimmaruta et al. 1999,<br />

Lanza 1946, 1999, Pastorelli et al. 2001,<br />

Salvidio et al. 1994). As already observed<br />

for S. strinatii (Salvidio et al. 1994), in S.<br />

italicus juveniles concentrate near <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cave and adult specimens<br />

in deeper zones.<br />

The hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> a spatial segregation<br />

between juveniles and adults due to<br />

behavioural interference is persuasive,<br />

and it has already been demonstrated in<br />

<strong>the</strong> American plethodontid genus<br />

Desmognathus (Colley et al. 1989) and<br />

verified by Salvidio & Pastorino (2002)<br />

even for Speleomantes strinatii.<br />

The overall spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> salamanders<br />

was positively correlated with<br />

light intensity. According to Roth (1976),<br />

Speleomantes are able to feed in complete<br />

darkness using only chemical cues.<br />

Notwithstanding this statement, is not<br />

unlikely that, when possible, cave salamanders<br />

prefer to forage in <strong>the</strong> twilight<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> visually guided prey catching<br />

behaviour.<br />

Similar to S. strinatii (Salvidio et al. 1994),<br />

even in a S. italicus population external<br />

activity was scarce and in proximity to <strong>the</strong><br />

cave entrance; <strong>the</strong> poor leaf soil produced<br />

by <strong>the</strong> coppiced wood near <strong>the</strong> cave<br />

probably cannot provide enough mois-


PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI Biota 3/i-a, 2002 125<br />

ture to allow salamanders to move outside,<br />

except during very humid periods.<br />

Salamander distribution inside <strong>the</strong> cave<br />

varies seasonally, as already observed by<br />

Lanza (1946). In winter, when external<br />

conditions are similar to internal ones,<br />

salamanders are active at a short distance<br />

from <strong>the</strong> entrance, while in fall and spring<br />

<strong>the</strong> animals are found at a greater distance.<br />

In summer <strong>the</strong> animals are active<br />

deeper inside <strong>the</strong> cave, where environmental<br />

variations are lower.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The authors thank Benedetto Lanza and Sebastiano Salvidio for useful suggestions.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

CIMMARUTA, R., FORTI, G., NASCETTI, G. & BULLINI, L. 1999: Spatial distribution and<br />

competition in two parapatric sibling species <strong>of</strong> European plethodontid salamanders.<br />

Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 11: 383-398.<br />

COLLEY, S. A., KEEN, W. H. & REED R. W. 1989: Effects <strong>of</strong> adult presence on behav- iour<br />

and microhabitat use <strong>of</strong> juveniles <strong>of</strong> a Desmognathine salamander. Copeia, 1989<br />

(1):1-7.<br />

LANZA, B. 1946: L'Hydromantes Gistel in Toscana e notizie sui suoi costumi (Amphibia;<br />

Caudata; Pletodontidae). Archo zoologico italiano, 31: 219-237.<br />

LANZA, B. 1959: II corpo ghiandolare mentomiero dei "Plethodontidae" ("Amphibia,<br />

Caudata"). Monitore zool. Ital. 67: 15-53.<br />

LANZA, B., NASCETTI, G. & BULLINI, L. 1986: A new species <strong>of</strong> Hydromantes from Eastern<br />

Sardinia and its genetic relationships with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Sardinian Plethodontids<br />

(Amphibia, Urodela). Bollettino Museo Regionale di Scienze Natural!, Torino 4:<br />

261-289.<br />

LANZA, B., CAPUTO, V., NASCETTI, G. & BULLINI, L. 1995: Morphologic and genetic studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European plethodontid salamanders: taxonomic inferences (genus<br />

Hydromantes). Bollettino Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Monografie XVI,<br />

Torino.<br />

LANZA, B., LEO, P., FORTI, G., CIMMARUTA, R, CAPUTO, V. & NASCETTI, G. 2001:<br />

Descrizione preliminare dello Speleomantes imperialis sarrabusensis subsp. n.<br />

(Amphibia: Caudata: Plethodontidae). Atti del III Congresso Nazionale S.H.I.,<br />

Pianura 13: 83-84.<br />

MUTZ, T. 1998: Haltung und Zuchtdes Sardischen Hohlensalamanders Hydromantes imperialis<br />

(Stefani, 1969) und einige Beobachtungen zur Okologie der Europaischen<br />

Hohlensalamander. Salamandra 34: 167-180.<br />

NASCETTI, G., CIMMARUTA, R., LANZA, B. & BULLINI L. 1996: Molecular Taxonomy <strong>of</strong><br />

European Plethodontid Salamanders (Genus Hydromantes). Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Herpetology 30: 161-183.<br />

PASTORELLI, C, LAGHI, P. & SCARAVELLI, D. 2001: Studi preliminari sull'ecologia di<br />

Speleomantes italicus (Dunn, 1923) nell'Appennino Tosco-Romagnolo. Atti del<br />

III Congresso Nazionale SHI (Pavia, 2000), Pianura 13: 347-351.<br />

ROTH G., 1976: Experimental analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prey catching behaviour <strong>of</strong> Hydromantes italicus<br />

Dunn (Amphibia, Plethodontidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 109: 47-58<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1990: Regime alimentaire d'une population epigee de Speleomantes ambrosii<br />

(Caudata, Plethodontidae) de la Ligurie Centrale (Italie septentrionale). Bulletin<br />

de la Societe Herpetologique de France 54: 69-72.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1991: Habitat ed attivita stagionale delle popolazioni interstiziali di<br />

Speleomantes ambrosii nell'alta Val Bisagno (Liguria Centrale). Rivista


126 Biota 3/1-2,2002 PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI<br />

Piemontese di Storia Naturale 12: 69-74.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1992: Diet and food utilization in a rock-face population <strong>of</strong> Speleomantes<br />

ambrosii (Amphibia, Caudata, Plethodontidae). Vie Milieu 44: 35-39.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1993a: Life history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Plethodontid Salamander Speleomantes<br />

ambrosii (Amphibia, Caudata). Herpetological Journal 3: 55-59.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1993b: Struttura di popolazione del geotritone Speleomantes ambrosii. Suppl<br />

Ric. Biol. Selvaggina XXI: 517-520.<br />

SALVIDIO, S.r LATTES, A., TAVANO, M., MELODIA, F. & PASTORINO, M. V. 1994: Ecology<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes ambrosii population inhabiting an artificial tunnel. Amphibia-<br />

Reptilia, 15:35-45.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1996: L'ecologia del Pletodontidi europei: stato delle ricerche sul geotritone<br />

Speleomantes ambrosii. Atti del 1 ° Convegno italiano di Erpetologia montana.<br />

Studi trentini di Scienze Naturali, Acta Biologica 71: 133-136.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1998: Estimating abundance and biomass <strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes strinatii<br />

(Caudata, Plethodontidae) population by temporary removal sampling.<br />

Amphibia-Reptilia 19: 113-124.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. & PASTORINO, M.V. 2002: Spatial segregation in <strong>the</strong> European plethodontid<br />

Speleomantes strinatii in relation to age and sex. Amphibia-Reptilia 23: 505-<br />

510.<br />

THORN, R. 1969: Les salamandres d'Europe d'Asie et d'Afrique du Nord. Paul Lechevalier,<br />

Paris.<br />

VOESENEK, L. A. C. J., ROOY (VAN), P. T. J. C. & STRIJBOSCH, H. 1987: Some autoecological<br />

data on <strong>the</strong> Urodeles <strong>of</strong> Sardinia. Amphibia-Reptilia 8: 307-314.


PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI Biota 3/1-2.2002 127<br />

Speleomantes antipredator<br />

strategies: a review and new<br />

observations<br />

Christian PASTORELLI1, Paolo LAGHI2 & Dino<br />

SCARAVELLI3<br />

Y Cerchia di S. Egidio 2205, 47023 Cesena (FC), Italy<br />

E-mail: pastorellic@libero.it<br />

2v. Bruno C. Garibaldi 22, 47100 Forli, Italy<br />

E-mail: spelerpes@libero.it<br />

3Riserva Naturale Orientata e Museo di Onferno, p. Roma 1, 47855 Gemmano (RN),<br />

Italy<br />

E-mail: rnoonf@tin.it<br />

Abstract<br />

In <strong>the</strong> genus Speleomantes some antipredator adaptations are known, such as aposematic<br />

coloration, noxious skin secretions, body elevation and tail undulation, and immobility.<br />

During a long-term ecological study <strong>of</strong> Italian Cave Salamander in <strong>the</strong> cave<br />

"Grotta del Tritone" in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Apennine mountains (Forll-Cesena province,<br />

Emilia-Romagna region, Italy), <strong>the</strong> authors observed some adult Speleomantes italicus<br />

displaying biting behaviour when taken by hand or forceps at <strong>the</strong> tail tip. Biting, as a<br />

defensive behaviour, is known for a number <strong>of</strong> plethodontid salamanders such as<br />

Aneides, Desmognathus, Gyrinophilus and Plethodon, but it has never before been<br />

observed and described in European plethodontid salamanders. Moreover, we observed<br />

<strong>the</strong> first case <strong>of</strong> damage to human skin by tail base gland secretions <strong>of</strong> Speleomantes<br />

supramontis, supporting <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> a defensive role for <strong>the</strong> tail base glands in <strong>the</strong><br />

genus Speleomantes.<br />

Key words: Antipredator strategies, defensive biting behaviour, noxious skin secretions,<br />

Speleomantes, Plethodontidae.<br />

Received 3 August 2002; accepted 26 September 2002


128 Biota 3/1-a, -M PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Prey may respond evolutionary to predator<br />

pressure ei<strong>the</strong>r by removing <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

from <strong>the</strong> foraging microhabitat <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> predators (predator avoidance mechanisms)<br />

or by reducing <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong><br />

successful predation when <strong>the</strong>y are within<br />

<strong>the</strong> perceptual field <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> predators<br />

(antipredator mechanisms) (Brodie et al.<br />

1991). Antipredator mechanisms are<br />

widely found in plethodontid salamanders.<br />

Aposematic coloration, noxious skin<br />

secretions, body elevation, tail undulation,<br />

immobility, biting, rapid escape<br />

movements, tail autotomy, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

mechanisms have been extensively studied<br />

among <strong>the</strong> American members <strong>of</strong> this<br />

family (Brodie 1977, 1983, Brodie et al.<br />

1989, Garcia-Paris & Deban 1995,<br />

Labanick 1984). However, antipredator<br />

strategies <strong>of</strong> European plethodontid<br />

Speleomantes are still poorly known.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

A long-term ecological study <strong>of</strong> Italian<br />

Cave Salamander has been carried out<br />

since 1998 in <strong>the</strong> cave "Grotta del<br />

Tritone" [43°53'52" N - 0°29'02"W<br />

(Rome)], in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Apennine<br />

mountains (Forli-Cesena province, Emilia-<br />

Romagna region, Italy). The aim <strong>of</strong> this<br />

research is to investigate severa aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> life history <strong>of</strong> Speleomantes italicus,<br />

such as seasonal activity, spatial distribution,<br />

individual displacements, population<br />

structure and size, diet, growth<br />

rates and reproductive behaviour<br />

(Pastorelli et al. 2001). During field work<br />

<strong>the</strong> authors observed some adult<br />

Speleomantes italicus displaying biting<br />

behaviour when taken by hand or forceps<br />

at <strong>the</strong> tail tip. This defensive behaviour<br />

Figure 1. The observed sequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> defensive biting behaviour displayed by<br />

Speleomantes italicus (explanation in <strong>the</strong> text).


PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI Biota 3/i-a, 2002 129<br />

was filmed with a digital video camera.<br />

During ano<strong>the</strong>r sampling session conducted<br />

in Sardinia in 1999, <strong>the</strong> authors<br />

observed <strong>the</strong> first case <strong>of</strong> damage to<br />

human skin by tail base gland secretions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Speleomantes supramontis.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The biting behaviour was observed in<br />

four Speleomantes italicus adult females.<br />

(A) The animal, caught at <strong>the</strong> tail tip, was<br />

hanging from forceps or hands and rested<br />

immobile for a few seconds.<br />

(B) Then it tried to free itself with rapid<br />

coiling-uncoiling movements, sometimes<br />

while urinating or producing noxious skin<br />

secretions mainly from its tail base.<br />

(C: 1, 2, 3) The salamander <strong>of</strong>ten opened<br />

its mouth, and sometimes bit its own tail<br />

or <strong>the</strong> forceps.<br />

(D) After some seconds <strong>the</strong> stressed animal<br />

returned to its initial position and<br />

remained stationary or, more rarely,<br />

repeated <strong>the</strong> biting sequence after a<br />

while.<br />

Biting as defensive behaviour is known<br />

for a number <strong>of</strong> plethodontid salamanders,<br />

such as Aneides, Desmognathus,<br />

Gyrinophilus and Plethodon (Brodie et al.<br />

1989), but it has never before been<br />

described for European plethodontid<br />

salamanders. Desmognathus quadramaculatus<br />

use biting to repulse attacks <strong>of</strong><br />

snakes, such as Thamnophis sirtalis<br />

(Brodie etal. 1989). Speleomantes italicus<br />

may take some advantage by biting<br />

behaviour against Anguis fragilis and<br />

Natrix snakes (Lanza, 1999a). Also, <strong>the</strong><br />

adhesive nature <strong>of</strong> skin secretions <strong>of</strong> Cave<br />

Salamanders can be used against snakes,<br />

as quoted for Plethodon and Ensatina by<br />

Arnold (1982).<br />

Only adult females displayed <strong>the</strong> biting<br />

behaviour. Although <strong>the</strong>se are preliminary<br />

data, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> a correlation<br />

between biting and nest defence in<br />

Speleomantes should be taken into<br />

account and verified, as it has been<br />

experimentally demonstrated in some<br />

American plethodontids (Bachmann<br />

1984, Horn etal. 1990).<br />

Body coiling has been also observed in<br />

several plethodontids, such as Aneides,<br />

Batrachoseps, Desmognathus, Ensatina,<br />

Gyrinophilus, Hydromantes, Plethodon,<br />

Pseudotriton, and Bolitoglossa (Garcia-<br />

Paris & Deban 1995). In Hydromantes<br />

platycephalus, which is closely related to<br />

Speleomantes, this generalized escape<br />

strategy, associated with tucking limbs<br />

close to <strong>the</strong> body, results in a peculiar<br />

rolling antipredator escape behaviour,<br />

similar to that displayed by <strong>the</strong> anuran<br />

genus Oreophrynella; this may represent<br />

a convergence between two distantly<br />

related, taxa that both occur on rocky<br />

slopes (Garcia-Paris & Deban 1995). A<br />

similar antipredator behaviour was also<br />

observed in Speleomantes italicus.<br />

Indeed, this species displayed limb tucking<br />

when coiling as a consequence <strong>of</strong> disturbance,<br />

and sometimes dropped down<br />

from <strong>the</strong> cave walls to <strong>the</strong> floor; thus, <strong>the</strong><br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> rolling escape or falling<br />

escape strategies in this genus should be<br />

verified. In S. italicus we also observed<br />

coiling, abundant skin secretions in <strong>the</strong><br />

tail base region, immobility (Lanza<br />

1999a), and escape by rapid snake-like or<br />

coiling-uncoiling movements.<br />

During sampling session, conducted by<br />

<strong>the</strong> authors in Sardinia in spring 1999,<br />

several specimens <strong>of</strong> all four Sardinian<br />

Speleomantes species were observed. In<br />

Speleomantes imperialis <strong>the</strong> authors<br />

observed abundant skin secretions at <strong>the</strong><br />

tail base region, body coiling, body elevation,<br />

and tail undulation, similar to <strong>the</strong><br />

antipredator strategies reported in Lanza<br />

(1999a).<br />

During <strong>the</strong> handling <strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes<br />

supramontis adult specimen that was<br />

taken by forceps at <strong>the</strong> trunk region, its<br />

tail base secretions mixed with urine were<br />

accidentally sprayed on <strong>the</strong> eyelid <strong>of</strong> one<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authors, causing irritation and


130 Biota PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI<br />

scald-like dermatological symptoms<br />

(Figure 2). Human skin responses to salamander<br />

toxins began only few seconds<br />

after <strong>the</strong> contact and lasted about ten<br />

days. It is worth noting that absorption <strong>of</strong><br />

salamander venom was reduced by<br />

promptly washing <strong>the</strong> eyelid with fresh<br />

water.<br />

The skin secretions <strong>of</strong> plethodontid salamanders<br />

are known to be very irritating<br />

to human mucous membranes. Hansen<br />

(1990) reported a severe reaction, includ-<br />

ing temporary blindness, suffered by a<br />

human after handling an adult<br />

Hydromantes platycephalus. Toxicology<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se secretions has been studied only<br />

for S. italicus (Benedicenti & Polledro<br />

1899) and S. strinatii (Ph\sa\\x 1918). This<br />

is <strong>the</strong> first observed case <strong>of</strong> damage to<br />

human skin by tail base gland secretions<br />

(although mixed with urine) <strong>of</strong> S. supramontis,<br />

supporting <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> its<br />

effective defensive function (Brizzi et al.<br />

1991).<br />

Figure 2. Human skin's reaction to Speleomantes supramontis tail base secretion include<br />

scald-like symptoms (in <strong>the</strong> rectangle).<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We thank Pr<strong>of</strong>. Benedetto Lanza for useful suggestions and literature, Franca Monti and<br />

Luciano Cicognani who realized <strong>the</strong> digital film, and ST.E.R.N.A. company for technical<br />

support.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ARNOLD, S. J. 1982: A quantitative approach to antipredator performance: Salamander<br />

defence against snake attack. Copeia 1982: 247-253.


PASTORELLI, LAGHI & SCARAVELLI Biota 3/1-2.2002 131<br />

BACHMANN, M. D. 1984: Defensive behaviour <strong>of</strong> brooding female red-backed salamanders<br />

(Plethodon cinereus). Herpetologica 40: 436-443.<br />

BENEDICENTI, A. & POLLEDRO ,O. 1899: Sulla natura e sulla azione fisiologica del veleno<br />

dello Spelerpes fuscus. Atti della regia Accademia dei Lincei, 296 Rendiconti 8<br />

(1st semester): 413-418.<br />

BRIZZI, R.r CALLONI, C. & DELFINO, G. 1991: Tail base glands in European plethodontid<br />

salamanders, with some comments on <strong>the</strong>ir biological and phylogenetic significance.<br />

Amphibia-Reptilia 12: 357-372.<br />

BRODIE, E. D. JR. 1977: Salamander antipredator postures. Copeia 1977: 523-535.<br />

BRODIE, E. D. JR 1983: Antipredator adaptations <strong>of</strong> salamanders: evolution and convergence<br />

among terrestrial species. In: Margaris N. S., Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki M. &<br />

Reiter R. J. (eds). Plant, animal, and microbial adaptations to terrestrial environment.<br />

Plenum Publishing Corporation; New York.<br />

BRODIE, E. D. JR., DOWDEY, T. G. & ANTHONY, C. 1989: Salamander antipredator strategies<br />

against snake attack: biting by Desmognathus. Herpetologica 45:167-171.<br />

BRODIE, E. D. JR., FORMANOWICZ, D. R. JR. & BRODIE III, E: D. 1991: Predator avoidance<br />

and antipredator mechanisms: distinct pathways to survival. Ethology<br />

Ecology & Evolution 3: 73-77.<br />

GARCIA-PARIS, M. & DEBAN, S. M. 1995: A novel antipredator mechanism in salamanders:<br />

rolling escape in Hydromantes platycephalus. Journal <strong>of</strong> Herpetology 29: 149-<br />

151.<br />

HANSEN, R. W. 1990: Hydromantes platycephalus (Mount Lyell Salamander). Toxicity.<br />

Herpetological Review 21: 91.<br />

HOM, C. L, WILLITS, N. H. & CLARK, C. W. 1990: Fitness consequences <strong>of</strong> nest defence in<br />

plethodontid salamanders: predictions <strong>of</strong> a dynamic optimisation model.<br />

Herpetologica 46: 304-319.<br />

LABANICK, G. M. 1984: Anti-predator effectiveness <strong>of</strong> autotomized tails <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salamander<br />

Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Herpetologica 40: 110-118.<br />

LANZA, B. 1999a: Speleomantes ambrosii (Lanza, 1955) - Ambrosis Holensalamander. In:<br />

Grossenbacher K. & Thiesmeier B. (eds). Handbuck der Reptilien und Amphibien<br />

Europas, Band 4/1, Schwanzlurche (Urodela) I (Hynobiidae, Proteidae,<br />

Plethodontidae, Salamandridae I: Pleurodeles, Salamandrina, Euproctus,<br />

Chioglossa, Mertensiella). AULA Verlag, Wiesbaden: 91-135.<br />

LANZA, B. 1999b: Speleomantes imperialis (Stefani, 1969) - Duftender Holensalamander.<br />

In: Grossenbacher K. & Thiesmeier B. (eds). Handbuck der Reptilien und<br />

Amphibien Europas, Band 4/1, Schwanzlurche (Urodela) I (Hynobiidae,<br />

Proteidae, Plethodontidae, Salamandridae I: Pleurodeles, Salamandrina,<br />

Euproctus, Chioglossa, Mertensiella). AULA Verlag, Wiesbaden: 155-163.<br />

PASTORELLI, C., LAGHI, P. & SCARAVELLI, D. 2001: Studi preliminari sull'ecologia di<br />

Speleomantes italicus (Dunn, 1923) nell'Appennino Tosco-Romagnolo. Atti del<br />

III Congresso Nazionale SHI (Pavia, 2000). Pianura 13: 347-351.<br />

PHISALIX, M. 1918: Les venins cutanes du Spelerpes fuscus Gray. Bulletin du Museum<br />

national d'Histoire naturelle 24: 92-96.<br />

STEFANI, R. 1969: La distribuzione geografica e I'evoluzione del geotritone sardo<br />

(Hydromantes genei Schleg.) e del geotritone continentale europeo<br />

(Hydromantes italicus Dunn). Archo zoologico italiano 53: 207-243.


POLYNOVA & POLYNOVA Biota 3/1-2.2002 133<br />

Tail autotomy as an index <strong>of</strong><br />

human influence on <strong>the</strong><br />

AlsophySax pipiens population in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Bogdino-Baskunchak state<br />

reserve<br />

Galina V. POLYNOVA1 & Olga E. POLYNOVA2<br />

'Russian Peoples' Friendship University, Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, Pavlova 8/5, Moscow,<br />

113093, Russia<br />

2Moscow State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Geography, Vorobyovy Gory, MOSCOW,<br />

119899, Russia<br />

E-mail: olgapol@aport.ru<br />

Abstracts<br />

We started our investigations in <strong>the</strong> Alsophylax pipiens Pall, population in August 1998<br />

and we concluded it in August 2000. The first part <strong>of</strong> our research dealt with <strong>the</strong> undisturbed<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population, and <strong>the</strong> second in a place where human influence is very<br />

high because <strong>of</strong> frequent excursions around <strong>the</strong> reserve territory. We collected <strong>the</strong> main<br />

population data in both territories and our comparison gave interesting results. We<br />

compared several sex-age groups in both parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population and counted <strong>the</strong> percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> tail autotomy in each group. In almost all groups in <strong>the</strong> disturbed part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

population this percentage is high. Therefore, tail autotomy can be an index <strong>of</strong> human<br />

pressure on ecosystems.<br />

Keywords: population, sex-age groups, tail autotomy<br />

Received 15 March 2002; accepted 3 August 2002


134 Biota 3/1-2,2002 POLYNOVA & POLYNOVA<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Alsophylax pipiens Pall, is <strong>the</strong> only species<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gekkonidae family inhabiting<br />

Russia. The whole <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species' area in<br />

Russia is represented by <strong>the</strong> territory <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> isolated population inhabiting <strong>the</strong><br />

Bolshoe Bogdo mountain in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Astrakhan region,<br />

which is situated beside a beach with <strong>the</strong><br />

largest salt deposits in <strong>the</strong> world, on <strong>the</strong><br />

shore <strong>of</strong> Lake Baskunchak. This is where<br />

Alsophylax pipiens was described for <strong>the</strong><br />

first time in 1813 by <strong>the</strong> great Russian scientist<br />

and traveller, Peter Simeon Pallas.<br />

In 1997 <strong>the</strong> environs <strong>of</strong> Lake Buskunchak<br />

and <strong>the</strong> mountain Bolshoe Bogdo<br />

acquired <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bogdino-<br />

Baskunchak state reserve.<br />

Our investigations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alsophylax pipiens<br />

population started in 1995 as <strong>the</strong><br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Astrakhan Herpetological<br />

expedition, financed by <strong>the</strong> MacArthur<br />

and ISAR Foundations (Polynova &<br />

Bozshansky 1995, 1998a, 1998b,<br />

Bozshansky & Polynova 1997,<br />

Bozshansky & Polynova 1998, Polynova<br />

& Polynova 2000). We continued our<br />

work in August 1998 and in August 2000<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Student Ecological Expedition <strong>of</strong><br />

Figure 1. Size by groups (1-5) <strong>of</strong> males and subadults (1998).<br />

«<br />

6-,<br />

5 -<br />

I ^<br />

B 3<br />

d o<br />

Z z "<br />

1 -<br />

Q<br />

ihi<br />

-<br />

•<br />

.<br />

• - -<br />

' • :<br />

5<br />

*,<br />

i<br />

2<br />

11<br />

j<br />

f<br />

':<br />

'<br />

3<br />

<strong>the</strong> Russian Peoples' Friendship<br />

University, Ecological Department. The<br />

main purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expedition was to<br />

investigate human influence on <strong>the</strong><br />

reserve's ecosystems. The mountain<br />

Bolshoe Bogdo is <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recreational<br />

burden <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reserve's territory.<br />

This article deals with <strong>the</strong> data ga<strong>the</strong>red<br />

during <strong>the</strong> 1998 and 2000 field seasons<br />

and presents some interesting results.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

We used <strong>the</strong> following methods: catching,<br />

measuring, sex determining, marking<br />

with colour and finger cutting <strong>of</strong>f; mapping<br />

<strong>of</strong> lizards' meetings and movements;<br />

biotopes description and daily activity<br />

registration. The last two data will form<br />

<strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r publications.<br />

The young lizards that we couldn't distinguish<br />

by sex rate were put into <strong>the</strong><br />

subadult group (Figure 1, group no. 1).<br />

All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m spent one winter. We based<br />

our division <strong>of</strong> adult males and females<br />

into size-age groups on <strong>the</strong>ir body length.<br />

It is well known that adult lizards grow<br />

very slowly. That is why <strong>the</strong> variation line<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir body length is continuous.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> male data from 1998<br />

?<br />

\<br />

s<br />

><br />

J<br />

"<br />

4<br />

,<br />

"<br />

-••H<br />

|" ' - -<br />

-<br />

. .<br />

t<br />

i K<br />

t °<br />

.< ^^<br />

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41<br />

Body size (mm)


POLYNOVA & POLYNOVA Biota 3/1-2,2002 135<br />

Figure 2. Size groups <strong>of</strong> females (1998)<br />

34 -^' 35 -" 36 -: !-37, •*•*' 38 39<br />

*«,, ";v Body size (mm)<br />

show markedly distinguished groups<br />

(Figure 1, no. 2-5). The division <strong>of</strong> female<br />

groups is based on <strong>the</strong>ir variation line<br />

(Figure 2) and by analogy with <strong>the</strong> distinguished<br />

size groups <strong>of</strong> males. This<br />

method is imperfect to some extent, but<br />

Table 1. Body length <strong>of</strong> sex and age groups (public data)<br />

Sex and age groups<br />

Juveniles<br />

Juveniles<br />

Juveniles<br />

Subadults<br />

Subadults<br />

Just adults<br />

Just adults<br />

Just adults<br />

Adult males<br />

Adult males<br />

Adult females<br />

Adult females<br />

Body length (mm)<br />

16-18<br />

15-17<br />

18-20<br />

20-26.6 (22.41±0.60)<br />

19-24 (21. 5±0.2)<br />

25-28<br />

31-32<br />

34<br />

33-36 (35.0±0.3)<br />

22.5-33-0(31.310.5)<br />

31-33 (33.110.5)<br />

30-40(36.110.5)<br />

as <strong>the</strong> species is so small and rare, we<br />

considered it to be impossible to investigate<br />

lizards' age by <strong>the</strong> classic methods <strong>of</strong><br />

comparing annual bone rings. Table 1<br />

shows public data on this species' body<br />

length. The differences between subadult<br />

Authors<br />

Scherbak & Golubev, 1986<br />

Smirnovetal, 1985<br />

Chernov 1947<br />

Brushko 1995<br />

Shammakov 1981<br />

Andrushkol9555 Scherbak<br />

& Golubev 1986<br />

Brushko 1995<br />

Smirnovetal. 1985<br />

Kubykin 1975<br />

Brushko 1995<br />

Brushko 1995<br />

Kubykin 1975


136 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 POLYNOVA & POLYNOVA<br />

Table 2. Sex-age groups and tail autotomy percentage (August 1998).<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

group<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

Sex and age<br />

Subadults<br />

S3<br />

33<br />

•/ *//v5


POLYNOVA & POLYNOVA Biota 3/1-2,2002 137<br />

Figure 4. Size by groups (4-7) <strong>of</strong> females (2000).<br />

females (Figure 1,2). The average sizes <strong>of</strong><br />

groups are presented in Table 2. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

authors (Scherbak & Golubev 1986) also<br />

show <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> several sex-age<br />

groups in this species.<br />

The average male/female sex-ratio is<br />

1.4:1. The same-size male/female sexratio<br />

(groups no. 4 and no. 6) is 2:1. The<br />

older sex groups do not coincide, but on<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole we see <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

females over males. The prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

males in <strong>the</strong> whole population is due to<br />

young adult males (groups no. 2 and no.<br />

3). These males are probably from two<br />

clutches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same year. We base this<br />

probability on <strong>the</strong> information about two<br />

clutches known in this species (Scherbak<br />

& Golubev 1986).<br />

We see that in <strong>the</strong> youngest part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

population <strong>the</strong>re is a prevalence <strong>of</strong> males,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> sex-ratio changes to 1:1. As time<br />

goes by, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oldest females<br />

prevails over <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oldest<br />

males. Our data are quite representative,<br />

because we took <strong>the</strong>m from <strong>the</strong> wide territory<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population.<br />

The next body data - <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tail<br />

- needs special attention. It includes little<br />

information about <strong>the</strong> lizard's age<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high tail autotomy percent,<br />

but it has ano<strong>the</strong>r value. Tail autotomy<br />

percentage increases from subadult<br />

animals (14%) to mature females (100%)<br />

(Table 2). This increase is quite natural:<br />

those lizards who enjoy a longer life have<br />

more accidents. There are some public<br />

data about tail autotomy levels in <strong>the</strong><br />

Alsophylax pipiens populations (16.7% -<br />

Shammakov 1981, 30% - Anan'eva &<br />

Muhtabayar 1997).<br />

The next stage <strong>of</strong> our investigations in<br />

August 2000 was devoted to <strong>the</strong> most<br />

disturbed part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species' population.<br />

It lies in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern territory, at <strong>the</strong><br />

top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mountain. There we caught,<br />

measured, and marked 70 lizards (Table<br />

3, Figure 3, 4).<br />

As we can see, <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> population also has 7 sex-age groups:<br />

1 subadult group, 2 groups <strong>of</strong> adult males<br />

and 4 groups <strong>of</strong> adult females. Subadults<br />

were longer than in 1998, and adult<br />

males formed only two distinguished<br />

groups: <strong>the</strong> younger male group No. 2<br />

unites two groups from 1998 (no. 2, no.<br />

3, Table 2). The next size-age male group<br />

No. 3 was <strong>the</strong> same as in 1998 (No.4,<br />

Table 2). Finally, we couldn't find <strong>the</strong> oldest<br />

male group in 2000. At <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, females also formed a continuous<br />

variation line, which we divided approximately<br />

into 4 groups (by analogy with<br />

previous data and due to several maximums).<br />

It was more than in 1998. We


138 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 POLYNOVA & POLYNOVA<br />

found younger females No.4, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

female groups were approximately <strong>the</strong><br />

same in both seasons.<br />

It is obvious that <strong>the</strong>re were some<br />

changes in <strong>the</strong> male/female sex-ratio.<br />

The average sex -ratio was 1.6:1 (males :<br />

females), <strong>the</strong> same-age youngest<br />

male/female sex - ratio was 4.3:1 (males<br />

no. 2 and females no. 4, Table 3), <strong>the</strong>n it<br />

changed to 1:1 (males no. 3 and females<br />

no. 5 and no. 6) and, finally, <strong>the</strong>re were<br />

no oldest males corresponding to <strong>the</strong> oldest<br />

females.<br />

We can now see that <strong>the</strong> data <strong>of</strong> 1998<br />

and 2000 demonstrate <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

males in <strong>the</strong> whole population. This is<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> males in <strong>the</strong><br />

youngest group. Then we see <strong>the</strong> increasing<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> females in older groups<br />

and <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> females over males<br />

in <strong>the</strong> oldest part. We couldn't find such<br />

detailed information in public data. Some<br />

authors (Andrushko 1955, Scherbak &<br />

Golubev 1986) point out 1:1 sex -ratio in<br />

this species.<br />

Sex-age groups and sex-ratio data from<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1998 and 2000 field seasons have<br />

much in common, but tail autotomy<br />

materials differ. As we have shown, <strong>the</strong><br />

tail autotomy percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> undisturbed<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>astern population group<br />

naturally increases from <strong>the</strong> youngest to<br />

<strong>the</strong> oldest animals (Table 2). At <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, <strong>the</strong> tail autotomy percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

northwestern part is very high in all sexage<br />

rate groups, with exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

youngest females: no. 4 (Table 3). It is<br />

well known that tail autotomy in natural<br />

lizard populations can indicate natural<br />

predation pressure (Pianka 1970, Medel<br />

et. al., 1988 and o<strong>the</strong>rs), lizard density,<br />

aggressive interactions <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />

individuals, and o<strong>the</strong>r factors.<br />

The comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two population<br />

groups shows that: 1) <strong>the</strong> density <strong>of</strong><br />

lizards in <strong>the</strong> northwestern disturbed area<br />

is lower than in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern undisturbed<br />

area, so aggressive interactions<br />

between competitive individuals must be<br />

lower too; 2) natural predation (our<br />

observations) is <strong>the</strong> same; 3) <strong>the</strong> main<br />

difference between <strong>the</strong>se areas that can<br />

influence tail autotomy is <strong>the</strong> recreational<br />

burden. The high recreational burden <strong>of</strong><br />

this region consists <strong>of</strong> dozens <strong>of</strong> tourists<br />

and <strong>the</strong>ir cars. On weekends <strong>the</strong> number<br />

<strong>of</strong> visitors increases by three or four<br />

times. Lizards practically live under<br />

tourists' feet and our experience shows<br />

<strong>the</strong> ease <strong>of</strong> lizards' tail loss.<br />

The man-made pressure level can be<br />

undoubtedly measured for almost every<br />

animal and plant species that suffers it.<br />

But we know some indicator species that<br />

are most suitable for this aim. To our<br />

minds, <strong>the</strong> tail autotomy level in lizard<br />

populations may be one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. This<br />

index can be <strong>of</strong> value in factoring <strong>the</strong> disturbance<br />

caused by <strong>the</strong> recreational burden.<br />

We think that such an index is more<br />

important, especially in reserves, than<br />

investigations in already disturbed<br />

ecosystems, but it needs fur<strong>the</strong>r research.


POLYNOVA & POLYNOVA Biota 3/1-2,2002 139<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANAN'EVA, N.B. & MUNHBAYAR, K. 1997: Pisklivyy gekkonchik. In: Zemnovodnye i presmykauschiesya<br />

Mongolii. Presmykauschiesya. Kollektivnaya monografiya.<br />

Sovmestnaya rossiysko-mongorskaya ekspediciya. RAN, AN Mongolii. KMK Ltd.<br />

M.: 14-27.<br />

ANDRUSHKO, A.M. 1955: Presmykauschiesya Kazahskogo nagor'ya i ih hozyaystvennoe<br />

znachenie. Uchen. zap. Leningr. un-ta. Ser. biol. nauk 181: 19-43.<br />

BOZHANSKIY, AT. & POLYNOVA, G.V. 1998: Proekt regional'nogo spiska reptiliy Krasnoy<br />

knigi Astrahanskoy oblasti. In: Problemy sohraneniya bioraznoobraziya aridnyh<br />

regionov Rossii. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii.<br />

Volgograd, Rossiya, 11-17 sentyabrya 1998: 57-59.<br />

BRUSHKO, Z.K. 1995: Yaschericy pustyn' Kazahstana. Izd-vo Konzhyk, Almaty: 231 p.<br />

KUBYKIN, R.A. 1975: Ekologo-faunisticheskiy obzor reptiliy ostrovov oz. Alakol' (Vost.<br />

Kazahstan). Izv. AN KazSSR. Ser. biol. 3: 10-16.<br />

POLYNOVA, G.V. & POLYNOVA, O.E. 2000: Problemy sohraneniya gerpet<strong>of</strong>auny<br />

Astrahanskoy oblasti. In: Aktual'nye problemy ekologii i prirodopoPzovaniya. Izdvo<br />

RUDN, M.: 65-70.<br />

SMIRNOV, S.I., SHKUNOV, V.F., KUDAKINA, E.I. 1985: Gekkony Severnogo Prikaspiya. In:<br />

Voprosy gerpetologii. Nauka, L.: 195-196.<br />

CHERNOV, S.A. 1947: Materialy k gerpet<strong>of</strong>aune Kazahskogo nagor'ya, severnogo<br />

poberezh'ya Balhasha i gor. Kin-Tau. Izv. AN KazSSR. Ser. zool., vyp. 6.: 120-124.<br />

SHAMMAKOV, S. 1981: Presmykauschiesya ravninnogo Turkmenistana. Ylym, Ashhabad:<br />

311 p.


RACCA Biota 3/1-2.2002 141<br />

The conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Agile Frog<br />

Rana dalmatina in Jersey<br />

(Channel Islands)<br />

Laura RACCA<br />

The Durrell Institute <strong>of</strong> Conservation and Ecology, University <strong>of</strong> Kent, Canterbury, Kent,<br />

CT2 7NS, UK<br />

E-mail: Iauracca1@yahoo.it<br />

Abstract<br />

The Jersey population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Agile Frog has been declining in both range and number<br />

since <strong>the</strong> early 1900s. At <strong>the</strong> present time, <strong>the</strong>re is only one site on <strong>the</strong> island that supports<br />

a natural agile frog population. Since <strong>the</strong> 1980s, a captive breeding, reintroduction<br />

and habitat management programme involving various organisations has been trying<br />

to arrest this dramatic decline in agile frog numbers in <strong>the</strong> wild. All parties involved<br />

agreed that without a clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecology and habitat requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> agile frog in Jersey, it was difficult to develop management techniques for <strong>the</strong> protection<br />

and improvement <strong>of</strong> key habitat areas. The objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study are to (1)<br />

estimate <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> adult frogs through a mark - recapture programme; (2) monitor<br />

hatching success and recruitment; (3) study <strong>the</strong> interactions with o<strong>the</strong>r species present<br />

in <strong>the</strong> pond (toads, newts, invertebrates and grass snakes) and in <strong>the</strong> surrounding<br />

area (grass snakes, small mammals and birds); (4) determine <strong>the</strong> frog's overwintering<br />

preferences; (5) monitor <strong>the</strong> captive breeding programme and carry out an investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> potential reintroduction sites; (6) develop optimal conditions for captive rearing<br />

<strong>of</strong> tadpoles and consider a health monitoring protocol prior to release <strong>of</strong> captive raised<br />

frogs; (7) compare <strong>the</strong> habitat requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Agile Frog in Jersey and in nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

France. Preliminary results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study obtained from <strong>the</strong> observations collected during<br />

<strong>the</strong> first fieldwork season are presented here.<br />

Key words: conservation, decline, ecology, Jersey, Rana dalmatina, Species Action Plan.<br />

Received 6 September 2001; accepted 24 October 2001


142 Biota 3 i-->, RACCA<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The island <strong>of</strong> Jersey is situated 21 kilometres<br />

<strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> north-west coast <strong>of</strong> France<br />

and 128 kilometres from <strong>the</strong> English<br />

coast. Jersey is <strong>the</strong> largest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Channel<br />

Islands with a surface area <strong>of</strong> 117 square<br />

kilometres and an <strong>of</strong>ficial population <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 85,000. The island has its<br />

own government, called <strong>the</strong> States <strong>of</strong><br />

Jersey, which comprises 53 elected members.<br />

Jersey also has its own system <strong>of</strong><br />

local administration, fiscal and legal systems,<br />

and courts <strong>of</strong> law. Jersey is nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom nor a colony.<br />

It is not represented in <strong>the</strong> United<br />

Kingdom Parliament, whose Acts extend<br />

to Jersey only if <strong>the</strong> island expressly<br />

agrees that <strong>the</strong>y should do so. The island<br />

has allegiance to <strong>the</strong> British Crown. Jersey<br />

is not part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Union (States<br />

<strong>of</strong> Jersey 2001).<br />

The Environmental Services Unit (ESU) is<br />

<strong>the</strong> department within <strong>the</strong> States <strong>of</strong><br />

Jersey Planning and Environment<br />

Committee involved in almost every<br />

aspect <strong>of</strong> environmental management in<br />

Jersey. On <strong>the</strong> island, certain ecosystems<br />

are protected by a designation under <strong>the</strong><br />

planning law. They are called Sites <strong>of</strong><br />

Special Interest (SSI) and are monitored<br />

by <strong>the</strong> ESU to ensure that <strong>the</strong> conditions<br />

that make <strong>the</strong>m »special« are not lost<br />

(States <strong>of</strong> Jersey 2001).<br />

The following amphibians and reptiles are<br />

found in Jersey (Tonge 1986): Agile Frog<br />

Rana dalmatina Common Toad Bufo<br />

bufo, Palmate Newt Triturus helveticus,<br />

Grass Snake Matrix natrix, Slow Worm<br />

Anguis fragilis, Green Lizard Lacerta bilineata<br />

and Wall Lizard Podarcis muralis.<br />

They are all protected under schedule 1<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conservation <strong>of</strong> Wildlife (Jersey)<br />

Law 2000 (Jersey Legal Information<br />

Board 2001).<br />

Figure 1. North Slack, Ouaisne' Common. The only site in <strong>the</strong> island that supports a<br />

wild population <strong>of</strong> Rana dalmatina. The terrestrial habitat around <strong>the</strong> slack is a developing<br />

heathland.


RACCA Biota 3/i-a, 2002 143<br />

DISTRIBUTION AND DECLINE OF THE<br />

AGILE FROG<br />

Apart from Jersey, <strong>the</strong> agile frog is not<br />

found anywhere else in <strong>the</strong> British Isles<br />

(Grossenbacher 1997). The Jersey population<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agile frog has been declining<br />

in both range and numbers since <strong>the</strong><br />

early 1900s (Gibson & Freeman 1997). In<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1970s, <strong>the</strong> frog could be found in<br />

only seven localities, and by <strong>the</strong> 1980s<br />

this had dropped to only two sites (Tonge<br />

1986). In 1987, a spill <strong>of</strong> aldicarb (an<br />

agricultural pesticide) in one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sites<br />

caused <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two remaining<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> frogs (Gibson &<br />

Freeman 1997). Therefore, at <strong>the</strong> present,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is only one site in <strong>the</strong> island, a<br />

coastal heathland, which supports a population<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rana dalmatina in <strong>the</strong> wild<br />

(Figure 1).<br />

Possible causes <strong>of</strong> agile frog decline in<br />

Jersey are <strong>the</strong> following (Agile Frog<br />

Group 2001):<br />

1) Habitat loss / fragmentation. Jersey is<br />

a densely populated island and habitat<br />

fragmentation continues through development<br />

for housing and <strong>the</strong> associated<br />

services required. In addition, small-scale<br />

turnover <strong>of</strong> semi-natural habitats, including<br />

conversion <strong>of</strong> heathland and marginal<br />

farmland to agricultural land, mean<br />

that important habitat areas are continually<br />

being lost.<br />

2) Water quality. Jersey, not being part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> European Union, does not have to<br />

follow its guidelines for <strong>the</strong> maintenance<br />

<strong>of</strong> water quality. In Jersey, pollution <strong>of</strong><br />

groundwater is caused by two main<br />

sources, agriculture and domestic wastes.<br />

Agricultural nutrients and sewage from<br />

defective or poorly located soakaways are<br />

implicated in <strong>the</strong> pollution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> groundwater<br />

by <strong>the</strong> abnormally high nitrate concentrations<br />

observed. In addition, pesticide<br />

residue has <strong>of</strong>ten been detected in<br />

run-<strong>of</strong>f from arable farmland.<br />

3) Pollution events. As previously mentioned,<br />

a spillage <strong>of</strong> aldicarb in Noirmont<br />

pond in 1987 had a lethal effect on many<br />

frog and toad eggs and adults, and basically<br />

halved <strong>the</strong> agile frog's range<br />

overnight. Ano<strong>the</strong>r pollution event was a<br />

recent contamination <strong>of</strong> an area close to<br />

<strong>the</strong> airport by run-<strong>of</strong>f from airport firefighting<br />

practice. In addition, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

countless small scale pollution events<br />

occurring on a frequent basis throughout<br />

Jersey which threaten both aquatic and<br />

terrestrial habitats.<br />

4) Water shortage. Agriculture is <strong>the</strong> principal<br />

land use in Jersey and covers 58%<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total land area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> island. Land<br />

is intensively farmed due to <strong>the</strong> excellent<br />

soil quality, and <strong>the</strong> scarcity <strong>of</strong> land frequently<br />

leads to double cropping. The<br />

industry exacts a high demand from <strong>the</strong><br />

island's water supply and <strong>of</strong>ten improves<br />

land drainage to ensure rapid run-<strong>of</strong>f.<br />

Additionally, many houses are still not<br />

connected to a main water supply, and<br />

are instead reliant on <strong>the</strong> ground water.<br />

These agricultural and domestic factors<br />

may have caused <strong>the</strong> lowering <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

water table that is now being experienced<br />

in Jersey, which has resulted in <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong><br />

many ephemeral ponds.<br />

5) Predation pressures. Apart from <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

natural predators (palmate newts, some<br />

aquatic macro-invertebrates, small mammals,<br />

grass snakes, etc), frogs and toads<br />

are now also being predated by pets,<br />

which are increasing in numbers with <strong>the</strong><br />

growth in human population. Domestic<br />

cats and polecat-ferrets are both plentiful<br />

as feral pests. More recently, large numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> feral ducks have invaded many<br />

available water bodies, including <strong>the</strong> agile<br />

frog's only natural breeding site.<br />

6) Small population effects. The Jersey<br />

population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agile frog has, and still<br />

is, going through a severe Cbottleneckx<br />

effect. At <strong>the</strong> present time, <strong>the</strong> factors<br />

listed above are likely to be <strong>the</strong> most<br />

influential in determining <strong>the</strong> immediate<br />

survival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agile frog. In <strong>the</strong> longer<br />

term, however, any surviving population


144 Biota 3/1-2,2002 RACCA<br />

could become exposed to genetic risk<br />

factors, such as inbreeding depression<br />

(Caughley 1994).<br />

CAPTIVE BREEDING PROGRAMME OF<br />

THE AGILE FROG IN JERSEY<br />

A collaborative programme incorporating<br />

captive-breeding, reintroduction and<br />

habitat management started in <strong>the</strong> late<br />

1980s in order to try to arrest <strong>the</strong> potentially<br />

terminal decline in agile frog numbers<br />

in Jersey. The organisations involved<br />

are <strong>the</strong> Environmental Services Unit<br />

(ESU), <strong>the</strong> Herpetology Department <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Zoology Section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Societe<br />

Jersiaise. The main objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programme<br />

are (Agile Frog Group 2001) (1)<br />

to maintain self-sustaining captive safety<br />

net populations in <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extirpation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species from <strong>the</strong> remaining<br />

natural breeding site and (2) to generate<br />

surplus tadpoles and froglets for reintroduction<br />

into existing and potential new<br />

sites.<br />

Figure 2 shows <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> egg<br />

clumps found in <strong>the</strong> wild and number <strong>of</strong><br />

clumps taken for <strong>the</strong> captive breeding<br />

programme from 1990 to 2001. It is not<br />

clear if <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> clumps in <strong>the</strong> wild dur-<br />

ing 1994, 1995, and 1996 was real or if<br />

spawn were missed during <strong>the</strong> surveys<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unavailability <strong>of</strong> surveyors.<br />

REINTRODUCTION AND INTRODUC-<br />

TION SITES<br />

Grosnez pond<br />

This site (Figure 3) has never supported<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> agile frogs. It was chosen<br />

as an introduction site because it had<br />

good quality water and was a breeding<br />

site for toads and newts (Agile Frog<br />

Group 2001). The introduction started in<br />

1994 and <strong>the</strong> first clump <strong>of</strong> frog eggs was<br />

found two years later. Breeding has reoccurred<br />

in 1998, 1999, and 2000.<br />

Tadpoles were released in <strong>the</strong> pond for<br />

<strong>the</strong> last time in 2000 (Racca 2000).<br />

Noirmont pond<br />

This site (Figure 3) was an historic breeding<br />

pond for <strong>the</strong> agile frog until 1987,<br />

when a spill <strong>of</strong> an agricultural pesticide<br />

polluted its water. It was chosen as a reintroduction<br />

site after <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> water<br />

analyses indicated that <strong>the</strong> pollution<br />

problem had been solved and after<br />

observing that introduced toad tadpoles<br />

developed success<strong>full</strong>y to metamorpho-<br />

Figure 2. Total number <strong>of</strong> egg clumps found in <strong>the</strong> wild and numer <strong>of</strong> clumps taken for<br />

<strong>the</strong> captive rearing programme, from 1990 to 2001.<br />

a, 12-]<br />

1 10-<br />

1 8<br />

? 4-<br />

-i 2 -<br />

i 0<br />

0 No <strong>of</strong> chimps found at Ouaisne'<br />

D No <strong>of</strong> clumps taken for captive rearing programme


RACCA Biota 3/1-2, 2002 145<br />

Figure 3. Grosnez pond (A) and enclosure in Noirmont pond (B).<br />

sis. Frog tadpoles, taken from captive<br />

breeding sites, were introduced last year<br />

for <strong>the</strong> first time (Racca 2000) and <strong>the</strong>n<br />

again this year.<br />

Population status and reproductive success<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Agile Frog in Jersey<br />

In order to produce an effective conservation<br />

programme for <strong>the</strong> agile frog in<br />

Jersey, it is necessary to investigate <strong>the</strong><br />

threats to this species and its ecology and<br />

behaviour. For this reason, on February<br />

2001, I started a three year study on <strong>the</strong><br />

ecology and conservation <strong>of</strong> Rana dalmatina<br />

in Jersey. The objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

study are (1) to estimate <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

adult frogs through a mark - recapture<br />

programme; (2) monitor hatching success<br />

and recruitment; (3) study interactions<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r species present in <strong>the</strong> pond<br />

(toads, newts, invertebrates, and grass<br />

snakes) and in <strong>the</strong> surrounding area<br />

(grass snakes, small mammals, and birds);<br />

(4) determine <strong>the</strong> frog's overwintering<br />

preferences; (5) monitor <strong>the</strong> captive<br />

breeding programme and carry out an<br />

investigation <strong>of</strong> potential reintroduction<br />

sites; (6) develop optimal conditions for<br />

captive rearing <strong>of</strong> tadpoles and consider a<br />

health monitoring protocol prior to<br />

release <strong>of</strong> captive raised frogs; (7) compare<br />

<strong>the</strong> habitat requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agile<br />

frog in Jersey and in nor<strong>the</strong>rn France.<br />

These first, preliminary results were<br />

obtained from <strong>the</strong> data collected during<br />

this year's fieldwork season, from<br />

February to July 2001. Surveys were carried<br />

out every night between 22.00-<br />

24.00hrs during <strong>the</strong> breeding season (mid<br />

January to mid March). In total, 10 male<br />

frogs were caught and PIT-tagged<br />

(Camper & Dixon 1988). No females<br />

were caught. However, from <strong>the</strong> number<br />

<strong>of</strong> egg clumps found in <strong>the</strong> breeding<br />

Figure 4. Estimated mortality <strong>of</strong> eggs during embryonic phase, in <strong>the</strong> wild (left) and in<br />

captivity (right). North Slack, South Slack and Sump are <strong>the</strong> water bodies where egg<br />

clumps were found at Ouaisne' (left) . Site A and site B are captive breeding sites; <strong>the</strong><br />

first is a private garden pond and <strong>the</strong> latter is an enclosure at <strong>the</strong> Jersey Zoo (right).<br />

1 111 ULLi<br />

North Slack South Slack<br />

• % hatched eggs D% d*ad oggs at hatching


146 Biota 3/1-2,2002 RACCA<br />

Table 1. Summary <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> wild spawn and tadpole.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> clumps<br />

Estimated number <strong>of</strong> eggs<br />

First clump laid<br />

Minimum embryonic developmental time (days)<br />

First transformation<br />

Minimum tadpole developmental time (days)<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> froglets caught<br />

ponds (n = 7), it can be assumed that at<br />

least this number <strong>of</strong> breeding females this<br />

year visited <strong>the</strong> site. This year, only two<br />

clumps were laid in captivity. The highest<br />

egg mortality during <strong>the</strong> embryonic<br />

phase was 40% in <strong>the</strong> wild and 50% in<br />

captivity (Figure 4). The main predators<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tadpole phase in <strong>the</strong> wild were<br />

aquatic macro-invertebrates such as<br />

Water Boatmen Notonecta glauca, Water<br />

Spiders Agryroneta aquatica, Great<br />

Diving Beetles Dytiscus marginalis, Silver<br />

Water Beetles Hydriphilus piceus, and<br />

dragonfly nymphs Odonata. These data<br />

were collected by doing monthly standardised<br />

netting sessions in <strong>the</strong> water<br />

bodies where <strong>the</strong> tadpoles were found.<br />

Palmate newts were also caught in <strong>the</strong><br />

ponds, but in very small numbers. Only<br />

three sightings <strong>of</strong> grass snakes were<br />

noted during <strong>the</strong> whole period <strong>of</strong> fieldwork.<br />

Drift fences and pitfall traps were<br />

used in order to catch newly metamorphosed<br />

frogs. Once caught, <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

marked with waterpro<strong>of</strong> ink scratched<br />

with a needle on <strong>the</strong> skin <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

back legs. Sixty-eight froglets were<br />

caught and most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m were recaptured<br />

at least once.<br />

Table 1 summarises <strong>the</strong> data collected<br />

about wild spawn clump development<br />

during this year's fieldwork.<br />

7<br />

2950<br />

23/2/01<br />

27<br />

15/6/01<br />

66<br />

68<br />

Conclusions<br />

A Species Action Plan for <strong>the</strong> agile frog<br />

has just been published in Jersey. It was<br />

written and published by <strong>the</strong> Jersey Agile<br />

Frog Group and its main objectives can be<br />

summarised as follows:<br />

1) To ensure that all existing natural,<br />

introduction and reintroduction sites are<br />

actively protected.<br />

2) To increase <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> sites<br />

through introductions / reintroductions.<br />

3) To maintain a self-sustaining captive<br />

population <strong>of</strong> frogs at a minimum <strong>of</strong><br />

three locations.<br />

4) To fur<strong>the</strong>r investigate <strong>the</strong> threats to<br />

and ecology and behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agile<br />

frog in Jersey.<br />

5) To increase <strong>the</strong> conservation pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

and level <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agile frog's<br />

plight in Jersey.<br />

The situation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agile frog in Jersey is<br />

certainly worrying. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, an<br />

effort to try and change this situation is<br />

being made, with <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Species Action Plan and <strong>the</strong> involvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ESU, <strong>the</strong> Durrell Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Conservation and Ecology (DICE), <strong>the</strong><br />

Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, <strong>the</strong><br />

Zoology Section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Societe Jersiaise<br />

and, in <strong>the</strong> near future, with financial help<br />

from local businesses.


RACCA Biota 3/i-a, 2002 147<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Richard Griffiths for his constant help. I am also<br />

grateful to all <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Agile Frog Group for <strong>the</strong>ir enthusiastic involvement<br />

in this project. A grant from <strong>the</strong> Jersey Ecology Trust Fund and contributions from <strong>the</strong><br />

firm Mourant de Feu & Jeune and <strong>the</strong> Environmental Services Unit (States <strong>of</strong> Jersey<br />

Planning & Environment Committee) funded this year's PhD study.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

AGILE FROG GROUP 2000: Species Action Plan: <strong>the</strong> agile frog (Rana dalmatina) in Jersey.<br />

Environmental Services Unit, Jersey, 26 pp.<br />

CAMPER, J.D & DIXON, J.R 1988: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> a microchip marking system for amphibians<br />

and reptiles. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Research Publications 7100-<br />

159. Austin, Texas.<br />

CAUGHLEY, G. 1994: Directions in conservation biology. Journal <strong>of</strong> Animal Ecology, 63 (2):<br />

215-244.<br />

GROSSENBACHER, K. Rana dalmatina. In: Case, J.R, Cabela, A., Crnobrnja-lsailovic, J.,<br />

Dolmen, D., Grossenbacher, K., Haffner, P., Lescure, J., Martens, H., Martinez<br />

Rica, J.P., Maurin, H., Oliveira, M.E., S<strong>of</strong>ianidou, T.S., Veith, M. & Zuiderwijk, A.<br />

(eds.). 1997: Atlas <strong>of</strong> Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. SHE & SPN-MNHN,<br />

Paris.<br />

GIBSON, R. & FREEMAN, M. 1997: Conservation at home; recovery programme for <strong>the</strong><br />

agile frog Rana dalmatina in Jersey. Dodo Journal <strong>of</strong> Wildlife Preservation Trust<br />

33:91-104.<br />

Jersey Legal Information Board 2001: http://www.jerseylegalinfo.je, accessed July 2001.<br />

RACCA, L. 2000: Agile frog in Jersey: a field study (March-June 2000). Environmental<br />

Services Unit, States <strong>of</strong> Jersey Planning and Environment Committee (unpublished).<br />

States <strong>of</strong> Jersey 2001: http://www.gov.je, accessed July 2001.<br />

TONGE, S. 1986: The herpet<strong>of</strong>auna in Jersey. British Herpetological Society Bulletin 17: 18-<br />

19.


SALVIDIO, ALARIO, PASTORINO & FERRETTI Biota 3/1-2, 2002 149<br />

Seasonal activity and abundance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Speleomantes ambrosii in cave<br />

habitats<br />

Sebastiano SALVIDIO1f Gabriele ALARIO1,<br />

Mauro Valeric PASTORINO2 &<br />

Mirko FERRETTI3<br />

1DIP.TE.RIS-Universita di Geneva, Corso Europa 26, 1-16132 Geneva, Italia<br />

E-mail: salvidio@dipteris.unige.it<br />

2Gruppo Speleologico Ligure "A. Issel" - Busalla (GE), Italia<br />

3Gruppo Speleologico Lunense, Sarzana (SP), Italia<br />

Abstract<br />

In this study, seasonal activity, population structure and abundance <strong>of</strong> three S. ambrosii<br />

populations were studied in three natural caves in <strong>the</strong> Province <strong>of</strong> La Spezia, NW Italy.<br />

The annual pattern <strong>of</strong> activity showed two peaks, one in spring and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r in<br />

autumn. The demographic structure was analysed on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> body-size frequency<br />

distributions, and was composed <strong>of</strong> three well separated body-size groups. The smallest<br />

component corresponded to immatures in <strong>the</strong>ir first year <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>the</strong> intermediate<br />

one to immatures aged two, and <strong>the</strong> largest comprised subadults and adults aged three<br />

years or more. Temporary removal experiments were used to estimate population abundance.<br />

Results showed that S. ambrosii populations had relatively high probability <strong>of</strong><br />

capture, ranging from 0.51 to 0.88. These results are in good accordance with previous<br />

data obtained on S. strinatii living inside an artificial cavity. Thus, cave salamanders that<br />

concentrate inside underground habitats are highly exposed to disturbance and collection.<br />

Key words: Cave habitat, population structure, Speleomantes ambrosii, removal<br />

method.<br />

Received 3 September 2001; accepted 20 February 2002


150 Biota 3/1-2,2002 SALVIDIO, ALARIO, PASTORINO & FERRETTI<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The cave salamander Speleomantes<br />

ambrosii (Lanza 1955) is endemic to a<br />

small karstic area in Eastern Liguria and<br />

North-western Tuscany. It displays a wide<br />

altitudinal distribution, from 30 m a.s.l. to<br />

about 1700 m in <strong>the</strong> Apuan Alps, and it is<br />

found in extremely diverse habitats from<br />

coniferous forests and maquis to rocky<br />

areas, and it usually occurs in <strong>the</strong> leaf litter,<br />

under stones along streams, and in<br />

underground habitats (Lanza et al. 1995,<br />

Lanza, 1999). The species is listed in<br />

Annex II <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "Habitat Directive"<br />

92/43/ECC and is also protected by<br />

national (DPR 357/97) and regional legislation<br />

(L.R. Liguria 4/92 and L.R.<br />

Toscana 56/00). However, little is known<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biology and ecology <strong>of</strong> this<br />

endemic species. Forti et al. (1997) and<br />

Cimmaruta et al. (1999) studied <strong>the</strong> distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> S. ambrosiiand S. strinatii'm a<br />

parapatric area where <strong>the</strong>se species live in<br />

close contact. In this area, S. ambrosii<br />

seems confined to <strong>the</strong> more arid zones, in<br />

contrast to <strong>the</strong> more competitive S. strinatii<br />

(Cimmaruta et al. 1999).<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to collect basic<br />

data on <strong>the</strong> seasonal activity, abundance,<br />

and population structure <strong>of</strong> S. ambrosii<br />

living in underground habitats.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Activity and abundance <strong>of</strong> S. ambrosii<br />

were studied in three natural karstic caves<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Province <strong>of</strong> La Spezia, Eastern<br />

Liguria: Grotta del Papero (near Ricco del<br />

Golfo) at 205 m a.sl, Grotta Lunga di S.<br />

Antonio (near Pignone) at 230 m a.s.l.,<br />

and Grotta di Cassana (near Cassana) at<br />

190 m a.s.l. Salamanders were surveyed<br />

monthly, from September 2000 to August<br />

2001 in Grotta del Papero and Grotta<br />

Lunga di S. Antonio, while in Grotta di<br />

Cassana surveys were conducted from<br />

April to August 2001.<br />

Animals active on <strong>the</strong> cave walls were<br />

spotted with <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> a headlamp and<br />

counted without fur<strong>the</strong>r disturbance.<br />

Population abundance was estimated by<br />

temporary removal methods (Bruce<br />

1995, Salvidio 1998, 2001). In temporary<br />

removal experiments, all animals captured<br />

are physically removed from <strong>the</strong><br />

population, kept in a holding area, and<br />

relocated when <strong>the</strong> study is completed.<br />

When basic assumptions are met, (e.g.,<br />

population closure, equal sampling effort,<br />

equal catchability, and effective reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population after each search), <strong>the</strong><br />

statistics calculated from removal data are<br />

reliable. Salamanders were measured to<br />

<strong>the</strong> nearest millimetre, from <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

snout to <strong>the</strong> posterior part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cloaca<br />

(SVL). These SVL measurements generated<br />

polymodal frequency distribution histograms<br />

that were analysed with <strong>the</strong><br />

FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools<br />

(FiSAT) computer programme (Gayanilo<br />

et al. 1996) which enables <strong>the</strong> decomposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> mixed length-frequency distributions<br />

into <strong>the</strong>ir Gaussian components by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> Bhattacharya's (1967) log-differences<br />

method. Abundance was estimated<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programme CAP-<br />

TURE routine Mbh (White et al. 1982).<br />

This s<strong>of</strong>tware gives <strong>the</strong> population estimate<br />

Ni, its standard error (S.E.), and, if at<br />

least three removal samplings are used, it<br />

allows a test for homogeneity <strong>of</strong> capture<br />

probabilities with a x2 goodness <strong>of</strong> fit test.<br />

During this study no direct mortality <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> removed salamanders occurred, and<br />

at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> third removal sampling<br />

all salamanders were released at <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

capture sites.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Seasonal activity<br />

The activity patterns in <strong>the</strong> three caves<br />

were similar (Figure 1), and annual trends<br />

were highly correlated in Grotta del<br />

Papero and Grotta di S. Antonio<br />

(Spearman rank correlation coefficient: rs<br />

= 0.90, n =12; P < 0.01), suggesting that<br />

similar extrinsic (e.g., climate, food abun-


SALVIDIO, ALARIO, PASTORINO & FERRETTI Biota 3/1-2,2002 151<br />

Figure 1. Seasonal pattern <strong>of</strong> underground activity in three cave populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Speleomantes ambrosii.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> individuals<br />

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug<br />

dance) and/or intrinsic (e.g., physiological<br />

cycle) factors were acting in all sites<br />

simultaneously.<br />

Abundance <strong>of</strong> cave populations<br />

The statistics resulting from <strong>the</strong> temporal<br />

removal experiments are given in Table 1.<br />

Capture probabilities were always higher<br />

than 0.20, a value considered adequate in<br />

estimating population abundance in<br />

removal experiments (White et al. 1982).<br />

These results indicate that <strong>the</strong> assumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> closure were met. However, <strong>the</strong> numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> removed salamanders from both<br />

Grotta del Papero and Grotta Lunga di S.<br />

Antonio were too low to represent well<br />

structured populations. On <strong>the</strong> contrary,<br />

70 specimens were captured inside<br />

Papero<br />

S. Antonio<br />

Cassana<br />

Grotta di Cassana, suggesting that this<br />

latter cave was a more favourable habitat.<br />

Population structure<br />

All <strong>the</strong> salamanders captured in July 2001<br />

removal experiments (n = 106) were<br />

pooled to obtain an adequate sample to<br />

be analysed. Body-size measurements<br />

generated a polymodal frequency distribution<br />

histogram that was success<strong>full</strong>y<br />

decomposed into three separated gaussian<br />

components (Figure 2). The two<br />

smallest body-size groups (mean SVL =<br />

25.99, S.D. 2.67, and mean SVL = 41.11,<br />

S.D. 4.13) were composed <strong>of</strong> immature<br />

salamanders, while <strong>the</strong> largest one (mean<br />

SVL = 60.28, S.D. 5.44) was a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

Table 1. Speleomantes ambrosii removal data and population size estimates. Ni =<br />

Number estimated; S.E. = standard error; (Chi-square test for homogeneity <strong>of</strong> capture<br />

probabilities (P).<br />

Year 2000<br />

Grotta di S. Antonio<br />

Grotta del Papero<br />

Year 2001<br />

Grotta di S. Antonio<br />

Grotta del Papero<br />

Grotta di Cassana<br />

1st capture<br />

June 25<br />

19<br />

24<br />

1st capture<br />

July?<br />

10<br />

13<br />

42<br />

2M capture<br />

June 27<br />

3<br />

3<br />

2 capture<br />

July 9<br />

2<br />

8<br />

15<br />

3"" capture<br />

June 29<br />

0 1<br />

31 capture<br />

July 11<br />

2<br />

1<br />

13<br />

Ni<br />

22<br />

28<br />

14<br />

22<br />

79<br />

S.E.<br />

0.21<br />

0.34<br />

0.82<br />

1.25<br />

6.27<br />

X2 P Capture<br />

probability<br />

0.52 >0.05 0.88<br />

0.58 >0.05 0.85<br />

2.10<br />

2.77<br />

2.35<br />

>0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

>0.05<br />

0.70<br />

0.67<br />

0.51


152 3/1-2, 2OO2 SALVIDIO, ALARIO, PASTORINO & FERRETTI<br />

Figure 2. Speleomantes ambrosii population structure. The curves separating each<br />

Gaussian component were calculated by <strong>the</strong> FiSAT s<strong>of</strong>tware (see text).<br />

20 24 28 32 36 40<br />

subadults (i.e.r large immatures) and<br />

adults (i.e., gravid females and males with<br />

mental glands). If females reach sexual<br />

maturity at about 58 mm in SVL, as in S.<br />

strinatii (Salvidio 1993), <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> sex ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adult population was not different<br />

from 1 (17 males/9 females; Chi-square =<br />

2.46, P > 0.05).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

In <strong>the</strong> study caves, seasonal activity was<br />

clearly bimodal, peaking in summer and<br />

autumn, and during winter few active<br />

salamanders were observed on <strong>the</strong> cave<br />

walls. Overall, this pattern <strong>of</strong> activity was<br />

similar to that <strong>of</strong> a S. strinatii population<br />

inhabiting a rock-face habitat (Salvidio<br />

1993). This activity pattern was in agreement<br />

between sites, suggesting that <strong>the</strong><br />

same extrinsic or intrinsic factors were<br />

acting in all caves, which were in fact at<br />

similar altitudes and <strong>the</strong>refore exposed to<br />

similar climatic conditions.<br />

The demographic structure was composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> three Gaussian components,<br />

N-106<br />

48 52 53 60 64 68<br />

and two cohorts <strong>of</strong> immatures in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

first and second year <strong>of</strong> life were<br />

observed. The growth increment<br />

between <strong>the</strong>se two components was<br />

about 15 mm, a higher value in relation<br />

to that reported for a rock-face population<br />

<strong>of</strong> S. strinatii, in which juvenile<br />

growth was about 10-13 mm in <strong>the</strong> first<br />

year (Salvidio 1998). Within <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

body size group, it was not possible to<br />

separate o<strong>the</strong>r age classes, as growth rate<br />

decreases in larger (and older) individuals<br />

having reached sexual maturity.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> caves Grotta del Papero and Grotta<br />

Lunga di S. Antonio, few salamanders<br />

were removed from <strong>the</strong> cave walls, suggesting<br />

that <strong>the</strong>se sites hosted only a limited<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> salamanders living in<br />

<strong>the</strong> surrounding karst system. On <strong>the</strong><br />

contrary, in <strong>the</strong> cave Grotta di Cassana,<br />

<strong>the</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> salamanders was adequate<br />

to obtain effective estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

population abundance. Overall, 70 salamanders<br />

were removed and capture<br />

probabilities were relatively high (i.e.,


SALVIDIO, ALARIO, PASTORINO & FERRETTI BJOta 3/1-2, 2002 153<br />

0.51) suggesting that about half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

population was exposed to capture during<br />

each capture session. This value was<br />

similar to that obtained for S. strinatii living<br />

inside an artificial tunnel (mean value<br />

0.639; Salvidio 2001). Thus, Grotta di<br />

Cassana was a favourable habitat for<br />

salamanders that were highly exposed to<br />

disturbance and collection, at least during<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir underground peaks <strong>of</strong> activity.<br />

These results have implications for conservation,<br />

as those caves hosting large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> salamanders should be closed<br />

or monitored to avoid disturbance and<br />

overcollection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> endemic S. ambrosii.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Capture permits were obtained from <strong>the</strong> Italian A/linistero deH'Ambiente - Servizio<br />

Conservazione della Natura (prat. n. SCN/2D/98/14345 and SCN/2D/2001/378). We<br />

thank Edoardo Razzetti for his field help during <strong>the</strong> July 2000 sampling.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BRUCE, R. C. 1995: The use <strong>of</strong> temporary removal sampling in a study <strong>of</strong> population dynamics<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> salamander Desmognathus monticola. Australian Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology<br />

20: 403-412.<br />

CIMMARUTA, R., FORTI, G., NASCETTI, G. & BULLINI, L. 1999: Spatial distribution and<br />

competition in two parapatric sibling species <strong>of</strong> European plethodontid salamanders.<br />

Ethology Ecology and Evolution 11: 383-398.<br />

FORTI, G., CIMMARUTA, R., NASCETT, G. & BULLINI, L. 1997: Parapatria e competizione<br />

in pletodontidi del genere Hydromantes. S.ltE Atti 18: 121-124.<br />

GAYANILO, Jr., F.C., SPARRE, P. & PAULY, D. 1996: The FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment<br />

Tools (FiSAT) User's Guide. FAO Computerized Information Series (Fisheries), 8.<br />

Food and Agriculture Organisation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United Nations. Rome.<br />

LANZA, B. 1999: Plethodontidae - Lungenlose Salamander. In: Grossenbacher, K. &<br />

Thiesmeier, B. (eds.). Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas. Aula<br />

Verlag, Wiesbaden: 77-204.<br />

LANZA, B., CAPUTO, V., NASCETTI, G. & BULLINI, L. 1995: Morphological and genetic<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European plethodontid salamanders: taxonomic inferences (genus<br />

Hydromantes). Torino, Mus. reg. Sci. nai., Monografie 16, Torino.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1993: Life history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European plethodontid salamander Speleomantes<br />

ambrosii. Herpetological Journal 3: 55-59.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 1998: Estimating abundance and biomass <strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes strinatii<br />

(Caudata: Plethodontid) population by temporary removal sampling. Amphibia-<br />

Reptilia19: 113-124.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. 2001: Estimating terrestrial salamander abundance in different habitats: efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> temporary removal methods. Herpetological Review 32: 21-24.<br />

SALVIDIO, S. LATTES, A., TAAVANO, M., MELODIA, F. & PASTORINO, M.V. 1994: Ecology<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Speleomantes ambrosii population inhabiting an artificial tunnel. Amphibia-<br />

Reptilia 15: 35-45.<br />

WHITE, G.C., ANDERSON, D.R., BURNHAM, K.P. & OTIS, D.L. 1982: Capture-recapture<br />

and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations. Los Alamos National<br />

Laboratory 8787 NERP, Los Alamos, New Mexico. 235 pp.


SCALI & GENTILLI Biota 3/1-2.2002 155<br />

A comparison <strong>of</strong> main heathlands<br />

in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

importance for amphibian<br />

populations<br />

Stefano SCALP & Augusto GENTILLI2<br />

'Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, C.so Venezia 55 - 1-20121 Milano<br />

E-mail: scaliste@iol.it<br />

2Dipartimento di Biologia Animale, Universita di Pavia, P.zza Botta 9-10, 1-27100 Pavia<br />

E-mail: augusto.gentilli@unimib.it<br />

Abstract<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> heathlands as habitat for reptiles has been stressed by many authors.<br />

Few studies about <strong>the</strong>ir importance for amphibians, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, are available<br />

and <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se habitats is probably underestimated. Heathlands are considered<br />

priority natural habitats by <strong>the</strong> European Union in <strong>the</strong> Habitats Directive and so<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir ecology is particularly important to understand.<br />

The authors conducted some herpetological research in <strong>the</strong> main heathlands in <strong>the</strong> Po<br />

Plain (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy) and combined new data with bibliographic information. Six<br />

heathland areas were investigated in Piedmont and Lombardy, and three to seven<br />

amphibian species were found; <strong>the</strong> complete list <strong>of</strong> taxa recorded in all <strong>the</strong> heathlands<br />

11 is <strong>the</strong> following: Triturus carnifex, T. vulgaris meridionalis, Pelobates fuscus insubricus,<br />

* f Bufo bufo, B. viridis, Hyla intermedia, Rana dalmatina, R. latastei, R. temporaria, R. synklepton<br />

esculenta.<br />

Some information about water presence and permanence, vegetation structure and<br />

coverage, soil type and distance from <strong>the</strong> Alps is also presented. Data were analysed<br />

using multivariate techniques. Two areas were very different from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs: <strong>the</strong> first<br />

one is a deteriorating heathland, devoid <strong>of</strong> woods and permanent water, with a low<br />

amphibian species diversity; <strong>the</strong> second one is <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rnmost area and it is characterised<br />

by <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> many scattered trees. The o<strong>the</strong>r four zones were quite similar,<br />

even if some differences could be observed in amphibian species composition and<br />

habitat structure.<br />

Key words: Amphibians, conservation, heathland, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy<br />

Received 2 October; accepted 8 February 2002


156 Biota 3 1-5 SCALI & GENTILLI<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Heathlands are considered priority natural<br />

habitats by <strong>the</strong> European Union in <strong>the</strong><br />

Habitat Directive 92/43/CEE, Enclosure<br />

1, CORINE habitat code 31.2 because<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have strongly declined throughout<br />

Europe (Beebee 1996). Therefore, knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir fauna is particularly important<br />

for conservation projects.<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> heathlands as habitat<br />

for reptiles has been stressed by many<br />

authors (Spellerberg 1989, Stumpel<br />

1992, Scali 1995, Zuffi 1987a, b). Few<br />

studies about <strong>the</strong>ir importance for<br />

amphibians, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, are available<br />

(Scali 1993, Beebee 1996, Denton &<br />

Beebee 1996) and <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se habitats is probably underestimated.<br />

Many amphibian species that live in<br />

heathlands are considered very important<br />

taxa in <strong>the</strong> Habitats Directive: Triturus<br />

earn if ex, Pelo bates fuscus insubricus,<br />

Bufo calamita, Bufo viridis, Hyla arborea,<br />

Hyla intermedia, Rana arvalis, Rana dalmatina,<br />

Rana latastei and Rana lessonae.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The authors conducted some herpetological<br />

research in <strong>the</strong> main heathlands <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> western Po Plain (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy) during<br />

<strong>the</strong> last ten years, and <strong>the</strong>y combined<br />

new data with bibliographic information<br />

(Pozzi 1980). Six heathland areas were<br />

investigated in Piedmont and Lombardy:<br />

1. Piano Rosa, 2. Rovasenda, 3. Lonate<br />

Pozzolo, 4. Mombello, 5. Ca' del Re, and<br />

6. Salvadorino (Figure 1).<br />

We prepared a matrix using <strong>the</strong> following<br />

variables: area, presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different<br />

taxa, total number <strong>of</strong> taxa, altitude, distance<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Alps, presence and number<br />

<strong>of</strong> permanent and temporary ponds,<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> some plant species (Pinus<br />

sylvestris, Betu/a pendu/a, Populus sp.,<br />

Quercus sp., Pteridium aquilinum), presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> woods in or around <strong>the</strong> area, and<br />

type <strong>of</strong> soil (clay or gravel). A summary <strong>of</strong><br />

all <strong>the</strong> variables and <strong>the</strong>ir abbreviations<br />

(in paren<strong>the</strong>ses) is as follows: i) heathland<br />

ID (Area), ii) distance from <strong>the</strong> Alps<br />

(Alps), iii) number <strong>of</strong> permanent ponds<br />

Figure 1. Location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study areas in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy. Heathlands are assigned by same<br />

numbers as in tables 1 and 2.<br />

__ Chattllon<br />

VALLFD.MlSTft<br />

TraverseHi. "*ji<br />

'Atogna Campo<br />

y<br />

- Breia \ Angara •.<br />

'• '"' Gozzano'1<br />

D Vv V^Sesto Sesto Catencte<br />

A8argcise-;ia , . '-*-.--<br />

.c\*ne<br />

v-.^<br />

DCantV<br />

n SonmaLambaVdO: ' Tr8dale Mar^nDC«ne<br />

"Cogsfale . 1 V: ...•., ° >JGallarete<br />

; _0urttengo<br />

" i -;/ * ~ *i' Pralungo.<br />

Peninefiflo<br />

Gattinaran<br />

•;<br />

Ghemme<br />

n .<br />

I1 '-ffusK Arsizio, .'-<br />

N :;,, i '<br />

°0lerao .nhonado'Lognalio .<br />

^_<br />

3_<br />

09ena90<br />

^Bislla _ --UJsona* -suano caston!)Primb ' Nerviam,<br />

:ambgijano •* ... :•. . '1-1^1 \n Jnveruno ° °<br />

% "a'vrea<br />

J^eroJo Canevese<br />

Socca Cana»t5« ; ^CaluSD<br />

.<br />

FelBto"<br />

J<strong>of</strong>razjo Vterron* ^h4maleiata " .Undwna<br />

.CV.L.biano<br />

" ° a<br />

^S^t^N ^ r , r-Cassolnovo<br />

TrOnzano VerceSese Bbrgo.Vercelli '•; °<br />

D - - ..c ..-'•-".«!. . "7 vigevano


SCALI & GENTILLI Biota 3/i-a, 2002 157<br />

Table 1. Habitat characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> six analysed heathlands. Presence <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

is coded as follows: 0=absent, 1=present; soil is coded as 1=clay, 2=gravel.<br />

Area<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Alps<br />

(Km)<br />

5<br />

15<br />

30<br />

25<br />

25<br />

65<br />

Permsites<br />

(N)<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Tempsites<br />

(N)<br />

2<br />

1<br />

6<br />

4<br />

3<br />

0<br />

(Permsites), iv) Number <strong>of</strong> temporary<br />

ponds (Tempsites), v) presence <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />

water (Permwater), vi) presence <strong>of</strong><br />

temporary water (Tempwater), vii) presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pinus sylvestris (Pinus), viii) presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Betula pendula (Betula), ix) presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Populus sp. (Populus), x) presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Quercus sp. (Quercus), xi) presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pteridium aquilinum (Pteridium),<br />

xii) percentage <strong>of</strong> woods in <strong>the</strong> area<br />

(Intwoods), xiii) percentage <strong>of</strong> woods<br />

around <strong>the</strong> area (Extwoods), xiv) type <strong>of</strong><br />

soil (Soil). The six areas were coded as<br />

wet or dry heathlands: <strong>the</strong> former ones<br />

have clayey and waterpro<strong>of</strong> soils, with<br />

hygrophilous vegetation, while <strong>the</strong> latter<br />

ones have gravelly and permeable soils<br />

and plants typical <strong>of</strong> dry areas. Two types<br />

<strong>of</strong> degradation can be found in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

heathlands: A) a lack <strong>of</strong> management<br />

that leads to a succession through to<br />

woodland mainly composed <strong>of</strong> exotic<br />

species, such as Robinia pseudoacada<br />

and Prunus serotina, B) a heavy human<br />

disturbance deriving from many kinds <strong>of</strong><br />

activities (i.e. road traffic, pollution, water<br />

drainage, buildings, etc.).<br />

The six studied areas (Figure 1) are<br />

described briefly below and in Table 1:<br />

1. Piano Rosa (300 m a.s.l.): it is a medium-sized,<br />

well preserved, wet heathland<br />

near <strong>the</strong> Alps, with sparse woods and<br />

large open areas. It is surrounded by<br />

woods and agricultural lands. A small<br />

number <strong>of</strong> permanent and temporary<br />

ponds are present.<br />

2. Rovasenda (220 m a.s.l.): it is a large,<br />

well preserved, wet heathland. Human<br />

Permwater Tempwater Pinus<br />

(N) (N)<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

1 ( ) 0<br />

Betula<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Populus<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Quercus<br />

disturbance is low and many different<br />

microhabitats are present. A stream and<br />

some permanent and temporary ponds<br />

are present.<br />

3. Lonate Pozzolo (220 m a.s.l.): it is a<br />

large, deteriorating, wet area with small,<br />

well preserved portions. Human disturbance<br />

is quite heavy, due to military<br />

activities and road construction; a progressive<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> wood is also present.<br />

A thin woodland belt is present around<br />

<strong>the</strong> area. Only a small number <strong>of</strong> temporary<br />

ponds are present.<br />

4. Mombello (210 m a.s.l.): it is a medium-sized,<br />

deteriorating, wet heathland<br />

once used as a clay quarry. Human disturbance<br />

is quite low and caused by quarry<br />

activities on <strong>the</strong> borders and wood<br />

growth. The area is characterised by <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> many little rises covered by<br />

shrubs and woods. Two large, permanent<br />

and many temporary ponds are present.<br />

5. Ca' del Re (210 m a.s.l.): it is a medium-sized,<br />

well preserved, wet heathland<br />

located near <strong>the</strong> previous area. Human<br />

disturbance is low. Some sparse woods<br />

are present in <strong>the</strong> area and a deteriorating<br />

woodland belt surrounds <strong>the</strong> heathland.<br />

A large permanent pond and some temporary<br />

ponds are present.<br />

6. Salvadorino (70 m a.s.l.): it is a very<br />

small, well preserved, dry area with some<br />

isolated trees and shrubs. It is surrounded<br />

by typical plain woods and channels.<br />

Only one small permanent pond is present.<br />

Data were analysed using two multivariate<br />

methods (cluster analysis with <strong>the</strong><br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

I


158 Biota 3/1-2,2002 SCALI & GENTILLI<br />

Table 2. Presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ten Amphibian species in <strong>the</strong> six areas.<br />

Area<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Tricar<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0 1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Trivul<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Pelftis<br />

0 1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Bufbuf<br />

J<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 1<br />

Bufvir Hylint<br />

0<br />

0 1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

UPGMA method and correspondence<br />

analysis) with <strong>the</strong> MVSP 3.1 for Windows<br />

package. These two techniques were<br />

chosen to obtain some groups <strong>of</strong> related<br />

data; cluster analysis was used to group<br />

<strong>the</strong> heathlands in relation to habitat characteristics<br />

and presence <strong>of</strong> different<br />

species. Correspondence analysis allowed<br />

us to group different variables and<br />

species to understand <strong>the</strong> relationships<br />

between <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Figure 2. Dendrogram <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grouped<br />

heathlands in relation to habitat characteristics<br />

and species composition<br />

(UPGMA method).<br />

0,52 0,6 0,68 0,76 0,84 0,92 1<br />

-2<br />

-5<br />

-4<br />

-1<br />

RESULTS<br />

Three to seven amphibian species were<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> six heathlands (Table 2); <strong>the</strong><br />

complete list <strong>of</strong> taxa recorded in all <strong>the</strong><br />

heathlands is as follows: Triturus carnifex,<br />

T. vulgaris meridionalis, Pelobates fuscus<br />

insubricus, Bufo bufo, B. viridis, Hyla<br />

intermedia, Rana dalmatina, R. latastei, R.<br />

Randal<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0 1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Ranlat<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Ranesc<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Rantem<br />

J<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> species<br />

7<br />

5<br />

3<br />

5<br />

6<br />

6<br />

temporaria, and R. synklepton esculenta.<br />

A cluster analysis was conducted on <strong>the</strong><br />

basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data reported in Tables 1 and<br />

2 and <strong>the</strong> results are showed in Figure 2.<br />

Two areas (3 and 6) are well separated by<br />

a group <strong>of</strong> similar areas (1,2,4 and 5).<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> all species was related to<br />

environmental variables using <strong>the</strong> correspondence<br />

analysis to highlight habitat<br />

preferences <strong>of</strong> amphibians in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

heathlands. The results <strong>of</strong> this analysis are<br />

reported in Figure 3. Three main clusters<br />

were highlighted: i) Bufo viridis was<br />

grouped with <strong>the</strong> presence and <strong>the</strong> number<br />

<strong>of</strong> temporary sites, ii) Rana latastei<br />

and Bufo bufo were grouped with natural<br />

woodlands internal to studied areas, iii)<br />

Triturus vulgaris, Hyla intermedia and<br />

Rana synklepton esculenta were associated<br />

with permanent sites and surrounding<br />

woodlands. The o<strong>the</strong>r species appear to<br />

be less associated with <strong>the</strong> considered<br />

variables.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The six heathland areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> western Po<br />

Plain comprise good habitat for amphibians<br />

and <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> ten species was<br />

recorded altoge<strong>the</strong>r. The minimum<br />

recorded number <strong>of</strong> species was three<br />

and <strong>the</strong> maximum was seven. It is particularly<br />

interesting that some endangered<br />

taxa - such as Pelobates fuscus insubricus<br />

and Rana latastei ~ are present. These<br />

species usually live in wood land areas,<br />

but can also colonize some well-preserved<br />

heathlands.<br />

Our analyses showed a certain similarity<br />

in environmental characteristics and


SCALI & GENTILLI )ta 3/1-2, 2OO2 159<br />

amphibian species composition between<br />

<strong>the</strong> six considered areas.<br />

Only two areas were very different from<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs: <strong>the</strong> first one, (3), is a deteriorating<br />

heathland, devoid <strong>of</strong> woodland<br />

and permanent water, with a low<br />

amphibian species diversity. The scarcity<br />

<strong>of</strong> amphibians in this zone confirms <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

sensitivity to habitat degradation. The<br />

second area, (6), is <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rnmost area<br />

and it is characterised by <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

many scattered trees; <strong>the</strong> different habitat<br />

structure probably creates some<br />

microclimatic conditions that increase<br />

amphibian diversity. The o<strong>the</strong>r four zones<br />

are quite similar, even if some differences<br />

could be observed in amphibian species<br />

composition and habitat structure.<br />

In particular, <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Green<br />

Toad is correlated to temporary ponds, in<br />

accordance with <strong>the</strong> information available<br />

for this species (Nollert & Nollert<br />

1992, Scali 1995). The Common Toad<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Italian Agile Frog are present only<br />

in heathlands with internal woodlands,<br />

characterized by typical lowland trees (i.e.<br />

Quercus robur) (Borkin & Veith 1997,<br />

Grossenbacher 1997). The Smooth Newt,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Italian Treefrog and <strong>the</strong> Edible Frog<br />

need external woodlands, with large and<br />

sunny permanent ponds (Lanza 1983).<br />

Rana temporaria is only influenced by <strong>the</strong><br />

proximity to <strong>the</strong> Alps, because it usually<br />

lives in mountainous areas in Italy (Lanza<br />

1983). The Italian Spadefoot Toad was<br />

found only once by Pozzi (1980) in<br />

Rovasenda heathland; its presence should<br />

be considered occasional, because this<br />

species usually prefers areas with sandy<br />

soils (Lanza 1983). It is quite difficult to<br />

explain <strong>the</strong> habitat preferences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Italian Crested Newt; in particular, those<br />

preferences which do not appear clearly<br />

related to <strong>the</strong> variables used in <strong>the</strong> present<br />

study.<br />

Our results confirm that heathlands could<br />

be important for <strong>the</strong> preservation <strong>of</strong> some<br />

amphibian populations and for <strong>the</strong> maintenance<br />

<strong>of</strong> high amphibian diversity.<br />

Figure 3. Association between <strong>the</strong> variables calculated with correspondence analysis<br />

(Axis 1: Eigenvalue = 0.160, Percentage <strong>of</strong> variance = 74.7; Axis 2: Eigenvalue = 0.029,<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> variance = 13.5).<br />

CA variable scores


160 Biota 3/1-2,2002 SCALI & GENTILLI<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BEEBEE, TJ.C. 1996: Ecology and Conservation <strong>of</strong> Amphibians. Chapman & Hall, London:<br />

214 pp.<br />

BORKIN, L.J. & VEITH, M. 1997: Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Case, J.P., Cabela, A.,<br />

Crnobrnja-lsailovic, J., Haffner, P., Lescure, J., Martens, H., Martinez Rica, J.P.,<br />

Maurin, H., Oliveira, T., S<strong>of</strong>ianidou, T.S., Veith, M. & Zuiderwijk, A. (eds.), Atlas<br />

<strong>of</strong> Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Societas Europea Herpetologica &<br />

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (IEGP/SPN), Paris: 118-119.<br />

DENTON, J.S. & BEEBEE, TJ.C. 1996: Habitat occupancy by juvenile natterjack toads (Bufo<br />

calamita) on grazed and ungrazed heathland. Herpetological Journal 6: 49-52.<br />

GROSSENBACHER, K. 1997: Rana latastei Boulenger, 1879. In: Case, J.P., Cabela, A.,<br />

Crnobrnja-lsailovic, J., Haffner, P., Lescure, J., Martens, H., Martinez Rica, J.P.,<br />

Maurin, H., Oliveira, T., S<strong>of</strong>ianidou, T.S., Veith, M. & Zuiderwijk, A. (eds.), Atlas<br />

<strong>of</strong> Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Societas Europea Herpetologica &<br />

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (IEGP/SPN), Paris: 146-147.<br />

LANZA, B. 1983: Anfibi e Rettili. Guide per il riconoscimento delle specie animali delle acque<br />

interne italiane. 27. Anfibi, Rettili (Amphibia, Reptilia) [Collana del progetto finalizzato<br />

"Promozione della qualita deH'ambiente". AQ/1/205]. Roma; Consiglio<br />

Nazionale delle Ricerche.<br />

NOLLERT, A. & NOLLERT, C. 1992: Die Amphibien Europas: Bestimmung - Gefahrdung -<br />

Schutz. Franckh-Kosmos, Stuttgart.<br />

POZZI, A. 1980: Anfibi e Rettili della brughiera di Rovasenda (Piemonte). AQ/1756-67.<br />

Quaderni sulla "Struttura delle Zoocenosi terrestri". C.N.R., Roma: 467-472.<br />

SCALI, S. 1993: Osservazioni su Rana latastei e Triturus vulgaris meridionals nel Parco<br />

delle Groane (Lombardia, Italia). In: Ferri, V. (ed.). Atti del Primo Convegno<br />

Italiano sulla Salvaguardia degli Anfibi, Quaderni della Civica Stazione<br />

Idrobiologica Milano 20: 109-116.<br />

SCALI, S. 1995: Amphibians and reptiles <strong>of</strong> Groane Regional Park (Lombardy, NW Italy).<br />

First census and ecological notes. In: Llorente, G.A., Montori, A., Santos, X. &<br />

Carretero, M.A. (Eds.). Scientia Herpetologica. Asociacion Herpetologica<br />

Espanola, Barcelona: 307-311.<br />

SPELLERBERG, I.F. 1989: An assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> heathlands as habitats for reptiles.<br />

Botanical Journal <strong>of</strong>,<strong>the</strong> Linnean Society 101: 313-318.<br />

STUMPEL, A.H.P. 1992: Reptile management problems in Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands heathlands. In:<br />

Korsos, Z. & Kiss, I. (eds.), Proc. Sixth Ord. Gen. Meet. S.E.H, Budapest, 1991:<br />

421-424.<br />

ZUFFI, M. 1987a: Anfibi e Rettili del Parco lombardo della Valle del Ticino: risultati preliminari<br />

e proposte gestionali. Quaderni Civica Stazione Idrobiologica, Milano 14: 7-<br />

65.<br />

ZUFFI, M. 1987b: Su alcune stazioni di Podarcis sicula campestris (De Betta, 1857) della<br />

Lombardia occidentale (Reptilia Lacertidae). Atti della Societa italiana di Scienze<br />

natural! e del Museo civico di Storia naturale, Milano 128: 169-172.


SCALI, CORTI, GENTILLI, LUISELLI, RAZZETTI & ZUFFI Biota 3/i-a, 2002 161<br />

Continental versus Mediterranean<br />

European Whip Snake Hierophis<br />

viridiflavus: a morphometric<br />

approach<br />

Stefano SCALI1, Claudia CORTPf Augusto<br />

GENTILLI3, Luca LUISELLI4, Edoardo<br />

RAZZETTI5 & Marco A.L. ZUFFI5*<br />

'Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, c.so Venezia 55, 20121 Milano-ltaly<br />

2Dip. Biologia Animale e Genetica, University <strong>of</strong> Florence, via Romana 17, 50125<br />

Florence-Italy<br />

3Dip. Biologia Animale, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, p.za Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy<br />

"Istituto di Studi Ambientali "Demetra" (E.N.I. S.p.A.), via dei Cochi 48/B, 1-00133<br />

Rome, Italy; and F.I.Z.V., via Cleonia 30, 1-00152 Rome, Italy; and Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Biological Sciences, Rivers State University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, P.M.B. 5080, Port<br />

Harcourt (Rivers State)-Nigeria<br />

^Corresponding author: Museo di Storia Naturale e del Territorio, University <strong>of</strong> Pisa, via<br />

Roma 79, 1-56011 Calci (Pisa)-ltaly<br />

E-mail: marcoz@museo.unipi.it.<br />

Abstract<br />

Hierophis viridiflavus, a wide distributed European colubrid, has been subjected to taxonomic<br />

studies, with particular reference to morphological aspects <strong>of</strong> subspecific variation.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r aspects <strong>of</strong> biology, ecology, and ethology are still anecdotal. Because <strong>of</strong> its<br />

wide distribution and extreme abundance around <strong>the</strong> Tyrrhenian and Ligurian Seas, it<br />

could be <strong>of</strong> great interest to test if any eventual geographic variation <strong>of</strong> morphological<br />

features could be related to different ecological adaptations (i.e.: dietary habits, reproductive<br />

strategies). We focused our attention on <strong>the</strong> occurence <strong>of</strong>: a) larger body sized<br />

Hierophis viridiflavus in peninsular and continental (i.e. <strong>the</strong> Po valley area, pre-Alpine<br />

areas) Italy, b) smaller body sized Hierophis viridiflavus on small Mediterranean islands<br />

if compared to those with larger body size on large Mediterranean islands and mainland<br />

areas. The main set <strong>of</strong> results clearly indicate a strong differentiation among <strong>the</strong> considered<br />

populations: Hierophis viridiflavus <strong>of</strong> continental and north peninsular Italy do<br />

not differ from <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ligurian and Tyrrhenian islands. On islands, <strong>the</strong><br />

Whip snakes <strong>of</strong> Corsica and <strong>of</strong> small islands in <strong>the</strong> Tuscan Archipelago display a significantly<br />

high number <strong>of</strong> ventrals while in <strong>the</strong> Sardinian and Sicilian populations a lower<br />

number <strong>of</strong> ventrals has been found; <strong>the</strong> lowest number <strong>of</strong> ventrals is displayed by <strong>the</strong><br />

Sicilian population. These morphological differences suggest <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> separate


162 BJOta 3/i-a, 2002 SCALI, CORTI, GENTILLI, LUISELLI, RAZZETTI & ZUFFI<br />

evolutionary patterns. Therefore, as a consequence we propose to assign <strong>the</strong> Sardinian<br />

populations to Hierophis viridiflavus sardus (Suckow, 1798) and <strong>the</strong> Sicilian populations<br />

to Hierophis viridiflavus xanthurus (Rafinesque Schmaltz, 1810).<br />

Key words: morphometrics, snakes, Hierophis viridiflavus, Mediterranean distribution<br />

Received 19 October 2001; accepted 6 April 2002<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The European Whip snake, Hierophis<br />

viridiflavus, has a southwestern European<br />

distribution, inhabiting a great variety <strong>of</strong><br />

habitats from sea level up to 2000 m a.s.l.<br />

(Heimes 1993, Naulleau 1997). Formerly<br />

divided into three different subspecies,<br />

Hierophis viridiflavus viridiflavus, H.v.carbonarius<br />

and H.v. kratzeri, it has been<br />

quite recently subjected to a taxonomic<br />

revision by Schatti & Vanni (1986): <strong>the</strong>se<br />

authors suggested that most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variability<br />

observed is due to very high phenotypic<br />

variation, and <strong>the</strong>refore this<br />

species must be considered monotypic<br />

(Schatti & Vanni 1986, Heimes, 1993).<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, very recent (in <strong>the</strong><br />

present issue) genetic studies carried out<br />

by Joger and co-workers show that two<br />

clearly different genetic groups could be<br />

identified, a western one occurring in<br />

France, Switzerland and Italy west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Apennines, and an eastern one found in<br />

Croatia, Slovenia and eastern Italy (Nagy<br />

et al. 2001). Also, an increasing interest<br />

regarding ecology and biology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

European whip snake is also now evident<br />

(Ci<strong>of</strong>i & Chelazzi 1991, Capizzi et al.<br />

1995, Capula et al. 1997, Springolo &<br />

Scali 1998, Scali & Montonati 2000, Zuffi<br />

2001 a), but o<strong>the</strong>r aspects <strong>of</strong> life history<br />

traits are still anecdotal (Zuffi 2001 b,<br />

Zuffi et al. 2000). Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wide<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> this species and its abundance<br />

around <strong>the</strong> Tyrrhenian and<br />

Ligurian Sea coasts, it could be <strong>of</strong> great<br />

interest to test whe<strong>the</strong>r any geographic<br />

variation <strong>of</strong> morphological features could<br />

be related to different ecological adaptations<br />

(i.e.: dietary habits, reproductive<br />

strategies; Zuffi et al. 2000), as in <strong>the</strong><br />

case <strong>of</strong> mainland versus large or small<br />

island populations. Recently, new interest<br />

has been addressed to morphological<br />

variation and ecological plasticity <strong>of</strong> some<br />

Mediterranean reptiles (Delaugerre &<br />

Cheylan 1992, Corti et al 2001, Luiselli &<br />

Zuffi 2002). In particular we focused our<br />

attention on: a) larger body sized H. viridiflavus<br />

<strong>of</strong> continental and peninsular Italy,<br />

b) smaller body sized H. viridiflavus <strong>of</strong><br />

small Mediterranean islands if compared<br />

to those larger body sized specimens <strong>of</strong><br />

large islands and continental areas, in<br />

order to understand which biological<br />

structures could be related to life history<br />

traits, such as reproductive patterns or<br />

dietary habits (Delaugerre & Cheylan<br />

1992, Zuffi 2001 a).<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Whip snakes were examined i) from <strong>the</strong><br />

mainland (Lombardy and Tuscany, continental<br />

and peninsular Italy respectively);<br />

ii) from large islands (Corsica, Sardinia,<br />

Sicily); iii) from small islands (Elba,<br />

Montecristo, Pianosa, Capraia-Tuscan<br />

Archipelago; Tavolara, Caprera, Mai di<br />

Ventre-Sardinian satellite islands) (Figure<br />

1). Standard measurements on 326 specimens<br />

<strong>of</strong> H. viridiflavus from herpetological<br />

collections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Universities <strong>of</strong><br />

Florence, Milan and Pisa and from private<br />

collections were considered (± 1 mm):<br />

snout-vent length (SVL), tail length (tL),<br />

head length (HL), head width (HW),<br />

interorbital length (INT-ORB), number <strong>of</strong><br />

ventrals (VS), and number <strong>of</strong> subcaudals<br />

(SCS). Data are presented as average ± 1<br />

SD. The measurements were natural log-


SCALI, CORTI, GENTILLI, LUISELLI, RAZZETTI & ZUFFI Biota 3/1-2, 2002 163<br />

Figure 1. Study area and localities. 1 =<br />

Tuscany; 1bis= Lombardy; 2=Elba;<br />

3=Pianosa; 4=Montecristo; 5=Corsica;<br />

6=Sardinia; 7=Sicily.<br />

transformed to reach linearity and tested<br />

for normality. We used <strong>the</strong> residuals <strong>of</strong><br />

head size parameters against SVL to<br />

avoid any potential effect caused by<br />

snake size; Student t tests were used for<br />

<strong>the</strong> means between sexes. MANOVA was<br />

used for (i) island vs. continent, and (ii)<br />

between all studied localities (only those<br />

with sample size > 4). ANOVA (with<br />

post-hoc multirange tests, LSD test,<br />

Lesser Significant Differences), to highlight<br />

<strong>the</strong> significant group <strong>of</strong> variation<br />

(only those with sample size > 4). Tests<br />

were two-tailed, and set at ( = 0.05, with<br />

SPSS 8.0.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Intersexual comparison<br />

Whip snakes showed strong sexual size<br />

dimorphism in all characters (all with P <<br />

0.01), but HL (P > 0.05), with males evidently<br />

larger and longer (SVL: 819.4 ±<br />

147.5 mm, n = 179; HL: 25 ± 6 mm, n =<br />

116; HW: 16.6 ± 3.6 mm, n = 105; INT-<br />

ORB: 10 + 1.5 mm, n = 91) than females<br />

(SVL: 728.5 ± 147.9 mm, n = 77; HL:<br />

24.4 ± 6.1 mm, n = 54; HW: 13.5 ± 3.5<br />

mm, n = 52; INT-ORB: 8.5 + 1.4 mm, n =<br />

34), and with a lower number <strong>of</strong> VS<br />

(203.8 ± 21.3 vs. 210.5 ± 14.6). TL and<br />

SCS were excluded because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> damaged or injured tails.<br />

Mainland-island comparison<br />

Whip snake females were too scarce<br />

(sample size < 4) from many localities for<br />

any valid statistical approach to be carried<br />

out Whip snake males appeared significantly<br />

different in VS (F = 5.278, P <<br />

0.01, df = 4, R2 = 0.315, Radj = 0.255)<br />

and in one covariate (HL, F = 10.581, P <<br />

0.01, df = 1) between mainland and<br />

island (large plus small islands) categories,<br />

but not because <strong>of</strong> geographic area (F =<br />

3.834, P > 0.05).<br />

All localities comparison (with N > 4)<br />

Whip snake males showed clearcut differences<br />

in VS (F = 4.931, P < 0.001, df = 9;<br />

R2 = 0.52, Radj = 0.414), with no variation<br />

<strong>of</strong> covariates, but a significant influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> considered areas (F = 3.733, P <<br />

0.01). Among <strong>the</strong>se, snakes from<br />

Montecristo, Pianosa, Elba and Corsica<br />

have a significantly higher number <strong>of</strong><br />

ventral scales if compared to those from<br />

Sardinia and Sicily (Figure 2).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> latter show <strong>the</strong> lowest<br />

number <strong>of</strong> ventral scales <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Whip<br />

snake populations considered.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Sexual dimorphism is well documented in<br />

Hierophis viridiflavus, with larger and<br />

longer males than females (Springolo &<br />

Scali 1998, Scali & Montonati 2000). It<br />

has been long questioned whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are possible advantages in having sexes<br />

differ in head or body size. Shine (1994)<br />

argued that <strong>the</strong> larger male is a common<br />

pattern in species with evident male-male<br />

combats; Bonnet et al. (1999) found that<br />

Whip snake males are favoured in movement<br />

and long displacements by having a<br />

higher muscle mass if compared to


Biota 3/1-2, 2002 SCALI, CORTI, GENTILLI, LUISELLI, RAZZETTI & ZUFFI<br />

Figure 2. Geographical variation <strong>of</strong> ventral scales (average ± 1 SD) <strong>of</strong> Hierophis viridiflavus<br />

males.<br />

o<br />

M<br />

220<br />

210<br />

200<br />

190<br />

N- 12 5 25 13 16 5 S 16<br />

Tuscany Montecristo Sardinia Pianosa<br />

Elba Corsica Sicily Lombardy<br />

females. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> geographical<br />

variation in Whip snake males in <strong>the</strong><br />

Mediterranean islands considered shows<br />

that j) <strong>the</strong> high number <strong>of</strong> VS found in<br />

Montecristo, Pianosa and Corsica and <strong>the</strong><br />

low number <strong>of</strong> VS found in Sardinia and<br />

Sicily populations respectively are not<br />

correlated to <strong>the</strong> area size, ii) <strong>the</strong><br />

observed variability <strong>of</strong> Hierophis viridiflavus<br />

follows a north-south oriented pattern.<br />

This variability in Hierophis viridiflavus<br />

shares <strong>the</strong> same zoogeographical<br />

history <strong>of</strong> many Mediterranean animal<br />

populations (Corti et al. 1991, Masseti<br />

1993). Island snakes could have colonised<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole area during <strong>the</strong> Messinian<br />

salinity crisis (6 MY). They may have differentiated<br />

during several climatic<br />

changes according to independent<br />

trends. Sicilian whip snakes resemble <strong>the</strong><br />

snakes <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Italy, such as those in<br />

Calabria and Apulia (unpubl. data), with<br />

constant melanism, reduced body size<br />

and significant low number <strong>of</strong> ventral and<br />

caudal scales. The pattern <strong>of</strong> scale variation<br />

underlines an actual status <strong>of</strong> differ-<br />

ent body size structure (Saint Girons<br />

1978, Padoa 1981), a genetically determined<br />

character (Shine 2000). This significant<br />

difference throughout <strong>the</strong> species<br />

distributive area, particularly evident in<br />

<strong>the</strong> island populations considered, in<br />

accordance with preliminary data sets<br />

and suggestions presented by Nagy et al.<br />

(2001), leads us to reconsider that some<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Hierophis viridiflavus may be separated<br />

taxonomic units. We <strong>the</strong>refore suggest<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Sardinian populations could be<br />

tentatively assigned to Hierophis viridiflavus<br />

sardus (Suckow, 1798) and <strong>the</strong><br />

Sicilian populations to Hierophis viridiflavus<br />

xanthurus (Rafinesque Schmaltz,<br />

1810) (see Table 1 for morphometric<br />

data), even if a fur<strong>the</strong>r interdisciplinary<br />

approach <strong>of</strong> both morphometric and<br />

molecular techniques (see Nagy et al.<br />

2001) should be a necessary step <strong>of</strong><br />

investigation.


SCALI, CORTI, GENTILLI, LUISELLI, RAZZETTI & ZUFFI 3/1-2, 2OO2 165<br />

Table 1. Morphometric data <strong>of</strong> Sardinian and Sicilian proposed subspecies.<br />

Hierophis viridiflavus sardus<br />

Hierophis viridiflavus xanthurus<br />

sex<br />

male<br />

female<br />

male<br />

SVL<br />

n=16<br />

749.1±96.4<br />

558-860<br />

n=3<br />

656.7±55.9<br />

620-721<br />

n=5<br />

545±215.3<br />

372-860<br />

tL<br />

n=ll<br />

278.2±51.3<br />

192-334<br />

n=3<br />

217.7±27.6<br />

189-244<br />

n=5<br />

176.4±56.6<br />

121-271<br />

VS<br />

n=16<br />

200.2±4.2<br />

193-207<br />

n=3<br />

215.3±4.5<br />

211-220<br />

N=5<br />

195.4±2.3<br />

193-199<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We thank <strong>the</strong> Italian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and <strong>the</strong> National Park "Arcipelago<br />

Toscano" for permission to collect data on <strong>the</strong> Natural Reserve "Isola di A/lontecristo",<br />

<strong>the</strong> EU INTERREGG II project Corse-Toscana (Province <strong>of</strong> Livorno and University <strong>of</strong> Pisa)<br />

for granting most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research; <strong>the</strong> Parco Naturale di Migliarino, S.Rossore<br />

Massaciuccoli (Pisa) for permission to enter most protected areas; <strong>the</strong> Parco Naturale<br />

del Ticino and <strong>the</strong> Parco Naturale di Groane in Lombardy for permission to collect data;<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Herpetological Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences (CAS) <strong>of</strong> San<br />

Francisco (USA), <strong>the</strong> Museums <strong>of</strong> Natural History <strong>of</strong> Milan, Morbegno (Sondrio),<br />

Genua, Florence and Pisa. We also wish to thank all colleagues, friends, co-workers and<br />

students who provided useful information on preserved snakes in private collections.<br />

Finally, we wish to thank <strong>the</strong> Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History and Territory (University <strong>of</strong><br />

Pisa) for grants to MALZ.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BONNET, X., NAULLEAU, G. & SHINE, R. 1999: The dangers <strong>of</strong> leaving home: dispersal and<br />

mortality in snakes. Biological Conservation 89: 39-50.<br />

CAPIZZI, D., LUISELLI, L. CAPULA, M. & RUGIERO, L. 1995: Feeding habits <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Mediterranean community <strong>of</strong> snakes in relation to prey availability. Rev. Ecol.<br />

(Terre Vie) 50: 353-363.<br />

CAPULA, M., FILIPPI, E., LUISELLI, L. & TRUJILLO-JESUS, V. 1997: The ecology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Western Whip snake, Coluber viridiflavus (Lacepede, 1789), in Mediterranean<br />

Central Italy (Squamata: Serpentes: Colubridae). Herpetozoa 10: 65-79.<br />

CIOFI, C. & CHELAZZI, G. 1991: Radiotracking <strong>of</strong> Coluber viridiflavus using external transmitters.<br />

J. Herpetol. 25: 37-40.<br />

CORTI, C., LUISELLI, L. & ZUFFI M.A.L. 2001: Observations on <strong>the</strong> natural history and morphometrics<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Montpellier snake, Malpolon mospessulanus, on Lampedusa<br />

Island (Mediterranean Sea). Herpetological Journal 11: 79-82.<br />

CORTI, C., NISTRI, A., POGGESI, M. & VANNI, S. 1991: Biogeographical analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Tuscan herpet<strong>of</strong>auna (Central Italy). Revista Espanola de Herpetologia 5: 51-75.<br />

DELAUGERRE, M. & CHEYLAN, M. 1992: Atlas de repartition des batracien et reptiles de<br />

Corse. Ecole Pratique des Haute Etudes. Oikema: Pamplona.<br />

HEIMES, P. 1993: Coluber viridiflavus Lacepede, 1789 - Gelbgrune Zornatterln. In: Bohme,<br />

W. (ed.), Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, Band 3/I. Schlangen<br />

(Serpentes) I. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden: 177-198.<br />

LUISELLI, L. & ZUFFI, M.A.L. 2002: Female life-history traits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aspic viper Vipera aspis


BiQta 3/1-2, 2002 SCALI, CORTI, GENTILLI, LUISELLI, RAZZETTI & ZUFFI<br />

and sand viper (V. ammodytes) from <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean region. In: Schuett,<br />

G., & Hoggren, M. Beds.). Biology <strong>of</strong> Vipers. CPG/Biological Science Press: 279-<br />

284.<br />

MASSETI, M. 1993: Post-Pleistocene variations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-flying terrestrial mammals on<br />

some Italian islands. Suppl. Ric. Biol. Selvaggina, 21: 209-217.<br />

NAGY Z.T., JOGER U., GUICKING D. AND WINK, M. 2001: Phylogeography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

European Whip snake Coluber (Hierophis) viridiflavus, inferred from nucleotide<br />

sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mitochondrial cytochrome B gene and ISSR genomic fingerprintings.<br />

11th OGM <strong>SEH</strong>, Zalec, Slovenia, Abstracts. Biota 2, Supplement: 38.<br />

NAULLEAU, G. 1997: Coluber viridiflavus (Lacepede, 1789). In: Case, J.P., Cabela, A.,<br />

Crnobrnja-lsailovic, J., Dolmen, D., Grossenbacher, K., Haffner, P., Lescure, J.,<br />

Martens, H., Martinez Rica, J.P., Maurin, H., Oliveira, M.E., S<strong>of</strong>ianidou, T.S.,<br />

Veith, M., and Zuiderwijk, A.(eds.). Atlas <strong>of</strong> Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe.<br />

Societas Europaea Herpetologica & Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle<br />

(IEGP/SPN), Paris: 342-343.<br />

PADOA, E. 1981: Manuale di Anatomia Comparata dei vertebrati. Feltrinelli, Milano.<br />

RAFINESQUE SCHMALTZ, C.S. 1810: Caratteri di alcuni nuovi generi e nuove specie di animali<br />

e piante della Sicilia, con varie osservazioni sopra i medesimi. Sanfilippo,<br />

Palermo.<br />

SAINT GIRONS, H. 1978: Morphologie externe comparee et systematique des Viperes d'<br />

Europe (Reptilia, Viperidae). Rev. suisse Zool. 85: 565-595.<br />

SCALI S. & MONTONATI S. 2000: Analisi multivariata del dimorfismo sessuale in due specie<br />

di colubrini italiani (Coluber viridiflavus ed Elaphe longissima: Reptilia,<br />

Serpentes, Colubridae) su basi biometriche. Atti I Congresso Nazionale della<br />

Societas Herpetologica Italica, Torino 1996. Mus. reg. Sci. nat. Torino: 429-434.<br />

SCHATTI, B., & VANNI, S. 1986: Intraspecific variation in Coluber viridiflavus Lacepede,<br />

1789, and validity <strong>of</strong> its subspecies (Reptilia, Serpentes, Colubridae). Rev. suisse<br />

Zool., 93: 219-232.<br />

SHINE, R, 1994: Sexual size dimorphisem in snake revisited, Copeia 1994: 326-346.<br />

SHINE, R. 2000: Vertebral numbers in male and female snakes: <strong>the</strong> roles <strong>of</strong> natural, sexual<br />

and fecundity selection. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 455-465.<br />

SPRINGOLO, M. AND SCALI, S. 1998: Sexual dimorphism and ontogenetic changes in<br />

Coluber viridiflavus: a head morphometric analysis. In: Miaud, C. & Guyetant, R.<br />

Current studies in herpetology. Proc. 10th OGM Societas Europaea<br />

Herpetologica. Le Bourget du Lac-France: 413-417.<br />

SUCKOW, G.A. 1798: Anfansgsrunde der <strong>the</strong>oretischen und angewandten Naturgeschichte<br />

der Thiere. Weidmannischen Buchandlung, Leipzig<br />

ZUFFI, M.A.L. 2001 a: Diet and morphometrics <strong>of</strong> Coluber (=Hierophis) viridiflavus on <strong>the</strong><br />

island <strong>of</strong> Montecristo (Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Herpetological Journal 11:123-125.<br />

ZUFFI, M.A.L. 2001 b: Morphological and functional variability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whip snake (Hierophis<br />

viridiflavus) from Corsica: a comparative approach to o<strong>the</strong>r Mediterranean<br />

islands and mainland. Interregg II - Programme de cooperation scientifique -<br />

Corte, Pise, Sassari, Calgari. Bilan et perspectives. Congres Environment et identite<br />

en Mediterranee, Actes., Corte 13-16 Giugno 2000: 109-112.<br />

ZUFFI, M.A.L., CORTI, C. & LUISELLI, L.M. 2000: Significato adattativo della variabilita morfologica<br />

nel biacco (Hierophis viridiflavus) del Mediterraneo. 61° Congresso<br />

Unione Zoologica Italiana, S. Benedetto del Tronto (AP), 24-28 settembre 2000,<br />

Abstracts, 1 pag.


SUROVA Biota 3/i-a, 2002 167<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> frog egg aggregations<br />

as a control <strong>of</strong> abiotic factors<br />

Galina. S. SUROVA<br />

Moscow State University, Biological Faculty, Department Theory <strong>of</strong> Evolution<br />

E-mail: avs@avs.bio.msu.su<br />

Abstract<br />

Differences in oxygen concentration, temperature and pH between clutches <strong>of</strong> frog egg<br />

aggregations in Rana temporaria and ambient water were estimated. It was suggested<br />

that <strong>the</strong>se parameters could have an effect on egg mortality. We found that oxygen<br />

concentration, temperature and pH inside <strong>the</strong> clutch aggregations are different from<br />

those in <strong>the</strong> ambient water. Usually <strong>the</strong> temperature is higher within clutches so <strong>the</strong><br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> heat by eggs may have adaptive importance. Oxygen concentration is<br />

lower and pH becomes a little higher at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> embryonic life; this last phenomenon<br />

should be <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> natural physiological processes. Never<strong>the</strong>less, investigative<br />

parameters reflect <strong>the</strong> singularity <strong>of</strong> a particular locality in <strong>the</strong> pond.<br />

Key words: Rana temporaria, clutches; aggregations; temperature; concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

oxygen<br />

Received: 28 February 2002; accepted 17 May 2002


168 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 SUROVA<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In <strong>the</strong> middle latitudes brown frogs lay<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir eggs in large aggregations. It is a<br />

current opinion that such aggregations<br />

are condensers <strong>of</strong> heat (Seale 1982) and<br />

protect embryos and tadpoles from<br />

morning frost. The aggregation diminishes<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> daily temperature fluctuations<br />

and prevents <strong>the</strong> overcooling <strong>of</strong><br />

larvae (Waldman 1982). The thick layer<br />

<strong>of</strong> slime protects embryos and still inactive<br />

tadpoles from invertebrate predators<br />

(Rough 1976) and <strong>the</strong> pernicious influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> acid marsh waters (Freda 1986)<br />

Thus, aggregations are a perfect protection<br />

against external factors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment.<br />

The larger <strong>the</strong> aggregation, <strong>the</strong><br />

more strongly expressed its protective<br />

effect is (Waldman 1982).<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> negative effect <strong>of</strong><br />

aggregation is also well known: individuals<br />

from aggregated clutches die more<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten than those from solitary ones,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> high density (Surova &<br />

Severtzov 1985). The factors affecting<br />

mortality in tadpole aggregations when<br />

<strong>the</strong> larvae become free-swimming are<br />

now well known as an "effect <strong>of</strong> group",<br />

i.e. <strong>the</strong>y have an exclusively biogene origin<br />

(Schwartz et al. 1976). O<strong>the</strong>r factors<br />

<strong>of</strong> tadpole and egg mortality during early<br />

ontogeny have been very poorly investigated.<br />

There is only supposition that<br />

death can be caused by hypoxia and possible<br />

poisoning by <strong>the</strong> eggs' own metabolism<br />

products in <strong>the</strong> limited space <strong>of</strong><br />

aggregation (Surova & Severtzov 1985),<br />

as updating <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment occurring<br />

here only by diffusion (Burggren 1985)<br />

can be insufficient. There are no concrete<br />

data in this area.<br />

We undertook an attempt to characterize<br />

temperature, oxygen and acid modes in<br />

large aggregations <strong>of</strong> clutches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Common Frog Rana temporaria in two<br />

constant ponds at <strong>the</strong> Biological station <strong>of</strong><br />

Moscow State University near<br />

Zvenigorod, Moscow region, Russia.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> habitat<br />

Pond 1 is situated in a water-meadow<br />

near <strong>the</strong> Moscow river and is sunny practically<br />

all <strong>the</strong> time. The shallow places<br />

where <strong>the</strong> clutch aggregations were<br />

located were usually very warm. The<br />

study was carried out on two aggregations<br />

(N1 and N2), located near each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r. Pond 2 is smaller than 1. It is a part<br />

<strong>of</strong> a wood ravine which retains water and<br />

is very shady. The aggregations <strong>of</strong> clutches<br />

here (N3) were only occasionally<br />

warmed by <strong>the</strong> sun during <strong>the</strong> daytime.<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong><br />

environment<br />

Measurements began at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

spawning period, when most frogs have<br />

already laid <strong>the</strong>ir eggs (stage <strong>of</strong> development<br />

up to <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gastrula).<br />

The data were taken over a period <strong>of</strong> two<br />

weeks. Measurements in both ponds<br />

were stopped when <strong>the</strong> tadpoles reached<br />

<strong>the</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> free-swimming larva (stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> development according to Dabagjan &<br />

Sleptsova (1975)).<br />

The measuring instruments were positioned<br />

at different points <strong>of</strong> an aggregation:<br />

at <strong>the</strong> centre and <strong>the</strong> edges, on <strong>the</strong><br />

surface and at various depths (from 3 up<br />

to,. 9 points .for one measurement).<br />

Simultaneous parameters were measured<br />

in ambient water at a distance 15-20 cm<br />

away from an aggregation on <strong>the</strong> surface<br />

and at <strong>the</strong> same depth (also 3-9 points).<br />

All measurements were taken at approximately<br />

<strong>the</strong> same points every time. The<br />

final results are given on <strong>the</strong> diagrams as<br />

average values on all points for one<br />

measurement. Differences were tested<br />

with a t-test. The acidity was measured<br />

by a portable field pH-meter, temperature<br />

and content <strong>of</strong> oxygen (in mg/l) - by<br />

a portable oxymeter.<br />

RESULTS<br />

In pond 1 spawning began on April 10.


SUROVA Biota 3/1-2,2002 169<br />

Table 1. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> development and pH in <strong>the</strong> aggregations.<br />

Stages <strong>of</strong> development according to Dabagjan & Sleptsova (1975):<br />

0 - beginning <strong>of</strong> cleavage; 7 - middle <strong>of</strong> cleavage; 20 - neurula; 26 - 28 - tail bud; 29<br />

- 30 - hatching; 33 - 37 - external gills; 38 - 39 - beginning <strong>of</strong> development buds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

legs; 39 - free swimming larvae<br />

N<strong>of</strong><br />

Aggregation<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Measurement<br />

date<br />

IV<br />

3V<br />

5V<br />

10V<br />

14V<br />

IV<br />

3V<br />

5V<br />

10V<br />

14V<br />

IV<br />

3V<br />

5V<br />

10 V<br />

14V<br />

Age (days)<br />

17<br />

19<br />

22<br />

28<br />

32<br />

17<br />

19<br />

22<br />

28<br />

32<br />

5<br />

7<br />

9<br />

14<br />

18<br />

By <strong>the</strong> 17th <strong>of</strong> April several aggregations<br />

<strong>of</strong> clutches had formed. Two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, situated<br />

in <strong>the</strong> warmest part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pond,<br />

were taken for study. Aggregation 1 had<br />

a total area <strong>of</strong> 1.25 m2, number <strong>of</strong> clutches<br />

- 484, density - 387.2 clutches/m2.<br />

Aggregation 2 differed little in size (1.05<br />

m2), but it had a smaller number <strong>of</strong><br />

clutches (174), as a near-bottom layer<br />

was absent, and consequently <strong>the</strong>ir density<br />

was much smaller: (165.7 cl./m2). In<br />

<strong>the</strong> colder pond #2 spawning began on<br />

April 15, and a single, but very large<br />

aggregation was formed only by May 1,<br />

with an area <strong>of</strong> about 6 m2. (1.5m _ 4m),<br />

number <strong>of</strong> clutches - 611, and density -<br />

101.8 cl./m2.<br />

The water in pond 1 was neutral all <strong>the</strong><br />

time; in pond 2 it was alkaline (Table 1).<br />

The pH value in aggregations follows <strong>the</strong><br />

same pattern, i.e. <strong>the</strong> acid mode in aggregations<br />

<strong>of</strong> clutches corresponds to <strong>the</strong><br />

PH<br />

in <strong>the</strong> water<br />

6.9<br />

7.0<br />

7.0<br />

7.0<br />

-<br />

-<br />

7.1<br />

7.0<br />

6.9<br />

-<br />

-<br />

7.8<br />

7.8<br />

7.7<br />

-<br />

pH in <strong>the</strong><br />

aggregation<br />

8.2<br />

6.9<br />

6.8<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

7.7<br />

6.9<br />

6.7<br />

-<br />

-<br />

7.9<br />

7.7<br />

7.6<br />

-<br />

Stages <strong>of</strong><br />

development<br />

27-28<br />

29-30<br />

33-37<br />

38-39<br />

39<br />

27<br />

29-30<br />

33-37<br />

38-39<br />

39<br />

0-13<br />

7-20<br />

26-28<br />

29-30<br />

33-37<br />

acid mode <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pond. However, after<br />

hatching, <strong>the</strong> medium in aggregations<br />

became a little bit more acid. This is obviously<br />

connected with <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

active feeding and excretion <strong>of</strong> products<br />

<strong>of</strong> metabolism. pH values in <strong>the</strong> pond and<br />

in aggregations are favourable and are far<br />

from <strong>the</strong> threshold value <strong>of</strong> acidity conducive<br />

to deviations <strong>of</strong> development and<br />

embryo mortality (pH <strong>of</strong> 5.0 and lower;<br />

Freda 1986). The temperature and oxygen<br />

mode changes are given on <strong>the</strong> diagrams<br />

(Figure 1 - 3). In both ponds, temperature<br />

in aggregations was 1-3<br />

degrees higher than in ambient water.<br />

This is especially appreciable in aggregation<br />

2, where <strong>the</strong> difference is significant<br />

through <strong>the</strong> whole ontogeny period<br />

(Figure 2). In aggregation 1 <strong>the</strong> significant<br />

differences were observed only at<br />

<strong>the</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> hatching and at <strong>the</strong> stage <strong>of</strong><br />

free-swimming larva in a very dense,


170 'Biota 3/1-2,2002 SUROVA<br />

Figure 1. Temperature and oxygen content<br />

in ambient water and in <strong>the</strong> aggregation<br />

N 1.<br />

Legend: temperature; 1- in aggregation,<br />

2 - in <strong>the</strong> water;<br />

Oxygen; 3 - in aggregation, 4 - in <strong>the</strong><br />

water, * - p < 0.05; ** - p < 0.01.<br />

May. I May. 3 May. 5 May. 7 May.9 May II May. 13<br />

Figure 2. Temperature and oxygen content<br />

in ambient water and in <strong>the</strong> aggregation<br />

N 2.<br />

For legend see figure 1.<br />

May, I May. 3 May, 5 May. 7 May. 9 May 11 May. 13<br />

Figure 3. Temperature and oxygen content<br />

in ambient water and in <strong>the</strong> aggregation<br />

N 3.<br />

For legend see figure 1.<br />

May. 1 May. 3 May, 5 May, 7 May, 9 May II May. 13<br />

obviously <strong>the</strong>rmal aggregation <strong>of</strong> tadpoles<br />

(Figure 1). In <strong>the</strong> cooler pond 2, <strong>the</strong><br />

temperature in <strong>the</strong> aggregation was significantly<br />

higher than in ambient water<br />

(Figure 3). This relation was reversed on<br />

May 10. It happened because <strong>the</strong> temperature<br />

fell dramatically in a short time.<br />

The temperature in <strong>the</strong> ponds became<br />

lower, but in pond 2 it cooled down much<br />

more strongly (up to 8.7°C, but in pond 1<br />

upto10.5°C).<br />

The change <strong>of</strong> oxygen mode in aggregations<br />

also has a general tendency: <strong>the</strong><br />

level <strong>of</strong> oxygen in aggregations <strong>of</strong> clutches<br />

is always lower than in ambient water.<br />

In aggregation 2 <strong>the</strong>se differences are<br />

significant for all measurements (Figure<br />

2). In aggregation 1, at <strong>the</strong> egg stage and<br />

at hatching <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> oxygen in clutches<br />

and in <strong>the</strong> surrounding water has no<br />

significant differences, although <strong>the</strong><br />

means are very different (see Figure 1).<br />

After hatching <strong>the</strong> deviation becomes<br />

less, and <strong>the</strong> difference in oxygen content<br />

in aggregations and ambient water<br />

becomes significant. In aggregation 3 <strong>the</strong><br />

oxygen level was different at all times<br />

except at <strong>the</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> tail budding (May<br />

5), when <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> oxygen in <strong>the</strong><br />

aggregation and in <strong>the</strong> water was practically<br />

equal (Figure 3). On <strong>the</strong> same diagram<br />

it is clearly visible that at a practically<br />

constant level <strong>of</strong> oxygen saturation<br />

in <strong>the</strong> water from May 5 up to May 14,<br />

<strong>the</strong> oxygen level in an aggregation <strong>of</strong><br />

clutches, and <strong>the</strong>n tadpoles, is steadily<br />

reduced, reflecting increasing consumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> oxygen during <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong><br />

development.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The consumption <strong>of</strong> oxygen by embryo<br />

and larvae considerably reduces its level<br />

in <strong>the</strong> aggregation. On one hand, our<br />

study has obviously shown that <strong>the</strong> living<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> aggregation are closely connected<br />

with ambient values. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

hand, <strong>the</strong> aggregations <strong>of</strong> clutches form-


SUROVA 3/1-2, 2OO2 171<br />

ing thick layers <strong>of</strong> mucilage, and after<br />

hatching - aggregations <strong>of</strong> larvae with<br />

high density, are an independent system<br />

with temperature higher than ambient, a<br />

little more acidic medium and a lower<br />

content <strong>of</strong> oxygen. The accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />

heat by eggs and dark coloured tadpoles<br />

has obvious adaptive importance, as was<br />

already mentioned above.<br />

Such a strong downturn <strong>of</strong> temperature<br />

as occurred in pond 2 on May 10 could<br />

probably not be compensated for by any<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> heat in an aggregation.<br />

This indicates that <strong>the</strong> heat-sink ability <strong>of</strong><br />

an egg mass is not absolute; it has some<br />

limits which depend on ambient temperature.<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> higher <strong>the</strong> temperature,<br />

<strong>the</strong> better expressed is <strong>the</strong> ability<br />

<strong>of</strong> an aggregation to accumulate and<br />

to keep heat.<br />

The o<strong>the</strong>r parameters we tested probably<br />

have no direct adaptive importance but<br />

most likely reflect natural physiological<br />

processes in embryos and larvae. Such a<br />

small increase <strong>of</strong> acidity as we observed<br />

can not render oppressive action upon<br />

growth and development. If this does<br />

occur, it is more likely because <strong>of</strong> excretion<br />

specific metabolites under a high<br />

density <strong>of</strong> tadpoles (Schwartz et al.<br />

1976), but <strong>the</strong> pH level is not affected by<br />

this factor.<br />

The essential decrease <strong>of</strong> ambient oxygen<br />

level - especially just after hatching - can<br />

result in hypoxia and delay <strong>of</strong> ontogeny.<br />

However, it is necessary to note that<br />

hypoxia, naturally arising in aggregations,<br />

serves as a physiological trigger for hatching<br />

(Petranka et al. 1982). Certainly, oxygen<br />

level and pH which conduce to<br />

oppression can only be shown in fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

laboratory and field experiments. But <strong>the</strong><br />

data given here show that <strong>the</strong> fluctuations<br />

<strong>of</strong> temperature, oxygen and pH in<br />

aggregations do not go beyond <strong>the</strong> limits<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> causing <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> larvae.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, our earlier study showed<br />

that <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> aggregations could<br />

result in 70% larvae mortality (Surova &<br />

Severtzov 1985). Thus, <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> aggregation<br />

in <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> embryos and larvae is<br />

ambiguous and encourages us to continue<br />

to study <strong>the</strong> balance between <strong>the</strong><br />

adaptive protective effect <strong>of</strong> aggregations<br />

and <strong>the</strong> high price for selection <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />

to high density.<br />

Conclusions<br />

1. In aggregations <strong>the</strong> temperature is<br />

always higher than in ambient water.<br />

However, during a long and strong<br />

enough decrease <strong>of</strong> temperature, <strong>the</strong><br />

aggregation can not effectively retain<br />

heat.<br />

2. The level <strong>of</strong> oxygen in an aggregation<br />

is always lower than in ambient water.<br />

The content <strong>of</strong> oxygen in an aggregation<br />

is constantly reduced with <strong>the</strong> passage <strong>of</strong><br />

time. This is not always connected to parallel<br />

changes in environment, but more<br />

likely by its consumption by larvae.<br />

3. The acidity in an aggregation does not<br />

differ greatly from <strong>the</strong> acidity in water,<br />

only increasing slightly during late stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> development.<br />

4. The changes <strong>of</strong> investigated parameters<br />

in an aggregation are closely connected<br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir changes in ambient water.<br />

They have <strong>the</strong>ir own character for <strong>the</strong><br />

particular pond and place <strong>of</strong> aggregation<br />

locality.<br />

5. Never<strong>the</strong>less, an aggregation is a more<br />

or less independent system. It has <strong>the</strong><br />

original pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> internal<br />

abiotic factors that, in a number <strong>of</strong> cases,<br />

can have adaptive importance.


172 Biota 3/i-2, SUROVA<br />

REFERENCES<br />

DABAGYAN, N.B. & SLEPTZOVA, L.A. 1975: Common frog Rana temporaria. Obyekti<br />

biologii razvitiya. Moskva. Nauka: 442-462. In Russian.<br />

SCHWARTZ, S.S., PYASTOLOVA, O.A., DOBRINSKAYA, A.A. & RUNKOVA, G.G. 1976:<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> group in <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> water animals and chemical ecology.<br />

Moskva. Nauka. 152 p. In Russian.<br />

SUROVA, G.S. & SEVERTZOV, A.S. 1985: The mortality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> common frog (Rana temporaria)<br />

in <strong>the</strong> early ontogenesis and its factors. Zool. Journ. 64: 61-71.<br />

BURGGREN, W. 1985: Gas exchange, metabolism, and "ventilation" in gelatinous frog egg<br />

masses. Physiol. Zool. 58: 503-514.<br />

FREDA, J. 1986: The influence <strong>of</strong> acidic pond water on amphibians: a review. Water Air and<br />

Soil Pollut. 30: 439-450.<br />

PETRANKA, J.W., INST, J.I. & CRAWFORD, E.G. 1982: Hatching <strong>of</strong> amphibian embryos: <strong>the</strong><br />

physiological trigger. Science 217: 257-259.<br />

POUCH, F.H. 1976: Acid precipitation and embryonic mortality <strong>of</strong> spotted salamanders,<br />

Ambystoma maculatum. Science 192: 68-70.<br />

SEALE, D.B. 1982: Physical factors influencing oviposition by <strong>the</strong> woodfrog, Rana sylvatica,<br />

in Pennsylvania. Copeia 3: 627-635.<br />

WALDMAN, B. 1982: Adaptive significance <strong>of</strong> communal oviposition in woodfrogs (Rana<br />

sylvatica). Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 10: 169-174.


YOROS, KORSOS & SZALAY _ BlOta 3/1-2, 2003 _ 173<br />

A comparative morphological<br />

study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two Hungarian<br />

discoglossid toad species<br />

Bombina spp<br />

Judit VOROS1, Zoltan KORSOS1 &<br />

Ferenc SZALAY2<br />

'Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary<br />

E-mail: jvoros@zoo.zoo.nhmus.hu, korsos@zoo.zoo.nhmus.hu<br />

2Szent Istvan University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Anatomy and<br />

Histology, Istvan u. 2, H-1077 Budapest, Hungary<br />

E-mail: fszalay@univet.hu<br />

Abstract<br />

In order to study <strong>the</strong> hybridization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two Hungarian discoglossid toad species (Firebellied<br />

Toad, Bombina bombina and Yellow-bellied Toad, Bombina variegata), external<br />

morphological features (body length, head length, head width, forelimb length, femur<br />

length, tibia length, and foot length) <strong>of</strong> 271 specimens from 18 different localities <strong>of</strong><br />

Hungary were examined. In <strong>the</strong> hybrid zone (located in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn region <strong>of</strong><br />

Hungary) between <strong>the</strong> characteristic ranges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two species, intermediate individuals<br />

can be found showing intermediate morphological characters. A new videomorphological<br />

method was developed to quantify <strong>the</strong> external morphological characters, mainly<br />

<strong>the</strong> colour pattern on <strong>the</strong> belly (circularity, mean area, and mean circumference <strong>of</strong><br />

patches, patch density, area ratio, ratio <strong>of</strong> mean area and mean circumference, colour<br />

density), in order to facilitate reliable identification <strong>of</strong> pure and hybrid specimens. With<br />

<strong>the</strong> examination <strong>of</strong> specimens collected from different regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country, a hierarchical<br />

phenetic classification was performed to demonstrate <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Bombina hybrid zones in Hungary.<br />

Key words: Bombina bombina, Bombina variegata, hybridization, morphological characters,<br />

videoanalysis, colour pattern, phenetic classification<br />

Received 30 November 2001'; accepted 12 February 2002


174 3/1-2, 2OO2 VOROS, KORSOS & SZALAY<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Natural hybridization between <strong>the</strong> two<br />

European toad species, Fire-bellied Toad<br />

Bombina bombina and Yellow-bellied<br />

Toad Bombina variegata, was first reported<br />

in Hungary by Mehely (1892). The<br />

ranges <strong>of</strong> Fire-bellied Toad and Yellowbellied<br />

Toad meet in a wide front extending<br />

from Austria along <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn edge<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Danube Valley to <strong>the</strong> Black Sea and<br />

surrounding <strong>the</strong> Carpathian Mountains<br />

along <strong>the</strong>ir foothills (Szymura 1993).<br />

Hungary is an interesting part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Bombina hybrid zones. In <strong>the</strong> Great Plain,<br />

Fire-bellied Toad is very common, occuring<br />

in most <strong>the</strong> ponds. However, only isolated<br />

Yellow-bellied Toad populations can<br />

be found in <strong>the</strong> hilly regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country<br />

(above 300 m a.s.l.). In <strong>the</strong> regions<br />

where <strong>the</strong> ranges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two species<br />

meet, <strong>the</strong>y interbreed and form hybrid<br />

populations. Bombina hybridization in<br />

Hungary has been investigated in detail in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Matra Mountains and <strong>the</strong> Aggtelek<br />

Karst by Gollmann (1987 and 1986,<br />

respectively). It has been reported from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Mecsek Mountains (Mehely 1904),<br />

<strong>the</strong> Biikk Mountains (Dely 1996), and<br />

observed in <strong>the</strong> Zemplen Mountains as<br />

well (Voros 2000).<br />

In our study we investigated individual<br />

species identification <strong>of</strong> Bombina populations<br />

throughout Hungary, using external<br />

morphological characters. We compared<br />

samples from populations <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong><br />

typical habitats and from those with<br />

intermediate characters.<br />

We examined whe<strong>the</strong>r hybrid populations<br />

can be found in <strong>the</strong> presumed<br />

hybrid zones and what percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

measured specimens can be considered<br />

as hybrid. We also determined <strong>the</strong> most<br />

reliable character among 12 for identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two Bombina species.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Our study area contained 18 different<br />

study localities in Hungary (Figure 1).<br />

These were both typical Fire-bellied Toad<br />

and Yellow-bellied Toad habitats.<br />

Localities where <strong>the</strong> ranges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />

species meet, and hence interbreed, were<br />

preferred when selecting sampling sites.<br />

Altoge<strong>the</strong>r 271 Bombina specimens were<br />

studied, using two morphological methods.<br />

Seven morphometric characters<br />

were measured in <strong>the</strong> field, with an accuracy<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.1 millimetre: body length, head<br />

length, head width, forelimb length,<br />

femur length, tibia length, and foot<br />

length.<br />

A short video recording was shot in <strong>the</strong><br />

field <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ventral surface <strong>of</strong> every specimen,<br />

which was later analysed by a<br />

newly developed computer program to<br />

describe details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colour pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> belly. This method was chosen<br />

because, superficially, <strong>the</strong> two species can<br />

be distinguished most easily by observations<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colour and pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ventral surface. Video tapes were played<br />

and paused at each individual. A rectangle<br />

on <strong>the</strong> belly <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specimens<br />

(between <strong>the</strong> four limbs) was selected by<br />

<strong>the</strong> program, and this part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ventral<br />

surface was analysed. The exact characters<br />

calculated by <strong>the</strong> computer program<br />

were: circularity, mean area, and mean<br />

circumference <strong>of</strong> patches, patch density,<br />

area ratio (ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colour<br />

patches/background), ratio <strong>of</strong> mean area<br />

and mean circumference, and colour density.<br />

The computer program will be<br />

described in detail and published separately,<br />

and will be available in <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

Multivariate discriminant analyses were<br />

carried out for morphometric and videomorphological<br />

characters, first separated,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n combined toge<strong>the</strong>r. Before <strong>the</strong><br />

analysis we grouped all specimens into<br />

Fire-bellied Toad or Yellow-bellied Toad<br />

species according to <strong>the</strong> classical morphological<br />

methods (Mehely 1891). There<br />

were geographical regions <strong>of</strong> Hungary<br />

where we could find clearly identifiable<br />

individuals, such as <strong>the</strong> Hortobagy,


VORC3S, KORSOS & SZALAY Biota 3/i-a, 2002 175<br />

Tihany, and Dinnyes for Fire-bellied Toad,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Mecsek Mts. for Yellow-bellied<br />

Toad, and we could compare <strong>the</strong> populations<br />

from <strong>the</strong>se regions to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. A<br />

phenetic classification (unweighted pairgroup<br />

average method with Euclidean<br />

distances) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 18 sampling sites was<br />

applied to define <strong>the</strong> hierarchical relation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> populations. All analyses were carried<br />

out using Statistica for Windows<br />

(Version 5).<br />

RESULTS<br />

Discriminant analysis<br />

A discriminant analysis was applied for<br />

<strong>the</strong> two feature group (morphometric<br />

and videomorphological), first separated<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n toge<strong>the</strong>r. The first part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

results shows <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> characters<br />

in question affecting <strong>the</strong> segregation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> groups.<br />

ed in <strong>the</strong> mean circumference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

patches, area ratio, colour density, forelimb<br />

length, and tibia length (Table 1).<br />

The o<strong>the</strong>r result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discriminant analysis<br />

was <strong>the</strong> misclassification probability, in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> identification based on classical<br />

morphological features, into two species.<br />

The classification results show that preidentification<br />

with <strong>the</strong> classical morphological<br />

method corresponds by 92.46%<br />

to identification with <strong>the</strong> computer program<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colour<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> belly (Figure 2), but by<br />

only 87.44% with morphometric measurements<br />

(Figure 3.). If we take into consideration<br />

all 12 features, <strong>the</strong> correspondence<br />

is 95.48% (Figure 4).<br />

At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> misclassification<br />

probabilities show <strong>the</strong> overlap between<br />

<strong>the</strong> two pre-identified groups (i.e. <strong>the</strong><br />

two species). These percentages (7.54%,<br />

Table 1. The significance and <strong>the</strong> Wilks' Lambda values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 characters.<br />

Characters<br />

Mean area<br />

Mean circumference<br />

Patch density<br />

Area ratio<br />

Ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area and circ.<br />

Colour density<br />

Circularity<br />

Head length/ head width<br />

Forelimb length<br />

Femur length<br />

Tibia length<br />

Foot length<br />

According to <strong>the</strong> significance and <strong>the</strong><br />

Wilks' Lambda values (Wilks' Lambda is a<br />

statistic for <strong>the</strong> differentiation <strong>of</strong> two statistical<br />

populations; its value is 1 if <strong>the</strong> centroids<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two groups are indistinguishable,<br />

and 0 at maximal divergence (Podani<br />

1997), significant differences were detect-<br />

p-values<br />

0.326<br />

0.0001<br />

0.136<br />

0.0003<br />

0.224<br />

0.0003<br />

0.143<br />

0.259<br />

0.001<br />

0.027<br />

0.01<br />

0.117<br />

Wilks' lambda values<br />

0.246<br />

0.269<br />

0.248<br />

0.262<br />

0.247<br />

0.262<br />

0.248<br />

0.247<br />

0.259<br />

0.252<br />

0.254<br />

0.248<br />

12.56%, 4.52%) indicate <strong>the</strong> misclassification<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> videomorphological method<br />

(Figure 2-4).<br />

Phenetic classification<br />

To understand <strong>the</strong> relationships between<br />

<strong>the</strong> populations, we made a phenetic


176 Biota 3/1-2,2002 VOROS, KORS6S & SZALAY<br />

Figure 1. Sampling localities: 1. Aggtelek,<br />

2. Zemplen, 3. Beregi Plains, 4.<br />

Hortobagy, 5. Matra, 6. Kiskunsag, 7.<br />

Pilis, 8. Vertes, 9. Lake Velence, 10. River<br />

Drava, 11. Mecsek, 12. Lake Kis-Balaton,<br />

13. Balatonfenyves, 14. Tihanyi<br />

Peninsula, 15. Bakony, 16. Orseg, 17.<br />

Hansag, 18. Szigetkoz.<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples according to<br />

locality (samples from 38 populations).<br />

The phenogram (Figure 5) gave a hierarchical<br />

connection clearly defining <strong>the</strong> two<br />

Bombina species. There are specimens<br />

from closely situated study plots which<br />

belong to different species.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> videomorphological characters,<br />

<strong>the</strong> mean circumference <strong>of</strong> patches,<br />

<strong>the</strong> area ratio, and colour density<br />

(p=0.0001, 0.0003, 0.0003), and among<br />

<strong>the</strong> morphometric characters, <strong>the</strong> forelimb<br />

length and tibia length (p= 0.0027,<br />

0.01) were found to be most reliable for<br />

<strong>the</strong> differentiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two species.<br />

Regarding a single individual, consideration<br />

<strong>of</strong> all 12 characters proved to be <strong>the</strong><br />

most reliable method for species identification.<br />

According to our study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Aggtelek<br />

region (north-eastern Hungary) <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

hybrid populations. The samples <strong>of</strong><br />

Aggtelek were taken from closely situated<br />

sites, and because <strong>the</strong> specimens<br />

belong to both groups (species), <strong>the</strong>y<br />

have intermediate morphological characters.<br />

The ranges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two species meet<br />

here and individuals interbreed in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

habitats. The Pilis Hill (close to Budapest)<br />

also appeared to be an interesting locality,<br />

since specimens from this site had an<br />

uncertain position in <strong>the</strong> phenogram.<br />

To be able to define <strong>the</strong> hybrid zones <strong>of</strong><br />

Bombina species, we would like to study<br />

<strong>the</strong> genetic background <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> morphological<br />

characters in <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

Figure 2. The overlap in case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> colour patches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> belly. The striped<br />

columns show Fire-bellied Toad Bombina bombina, <strong>the</strong> blank columns show Bombina<br />

variegata. Overlap (misclassification probability) 7.54%.<br />

30<br />

o 15<br />

N N<br />

-4,5 -4,0 -3,5 -3,0 -2,5 -2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3.0 3.5 4,0


VOROS, KORSOS & SZALAY Biota 3/i-a, 2002 177<br />

Figure 3. The overlap in case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> morphometric measurements. The striped columns<br />

show Fire-bellied Toad Bombina bombina, <strong>the</strong> blank columns show Bombina variegata.<br />

Overlap (misclassification probability) 12.56%.<br />

-5,0 -5,0 -4,0 -3,0 -2,0 -1,0 0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0<br />

-5,5 -4,5 -3,5 -2,5 -1,5 -0,5 0,5 1,5 2,5 3,5 4,5<br />

Figure 4. The overlap in case <strong>of</strong> analysis by all 12 features. The blank columns show<br />

Fire-bellied Toad Bombina bombina, <strong>the</strong> striped columns show Bombina variegata.<br />

Overlap (misclassification probability) 4.55%.<br />

-5.5 -4.5 -3,5 -2,5 -1,5 -0.5 0,5 1,5 2,5 3,5<br />

-5,0 -4,0 -3,0 -2,0 -1,0 0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0<br />

Expected<br />

Normal<br />

Expected<br />

Normal


178 Biota 3/1-2,2002 VOROS, KORSOS & SZALAY<br />

Figure 5. Phenogram (UPGMA, Euclidean distances) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples according to localities.<br />

The upper group corresponds to Fire-bellied Toad Bombina bombina, <strong>the</strong> lower<br />

group to Bombina variegata.<br />

Uertes<br />

Plaiul<br />

Hortobag<br />

T ihany<br />

Dinnyes<br />

ftggtell<br />

T iszahat<br />

Szerenle<br />

Hortob2<br />

Baja<br />

Kisbal<br />

Mariaf<br />

Hortobl<br />

Ki skunsa<br />

Taljand<br />

Sz iget 1<br />

Bakony<br />

Hansag<br />

Sz iget 2<br />

Pilis<br />

Ronania<br />

Matra<br />

Ujhutal<br />

UjhutaS<br />

Ujhuta4<br />

Regec<br />

flggtelS<br />

Ohuta<br />

Ujhuta2<br />

Gone 2<br />

Goncl<br />

Zenplenl-<br />

Mecsek i<br />

Mecsek 2<br />

Ujhuta3<br />

UjhutaG<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We would like to thank <strong>the</strong> Nature Conservation Directorates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Balaton Upland<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Duna-lpoly National Parks for granting study permits in <strong>the</strong>ir respective territories.<br />

We are grateful to numerous persons not listed here who have made possible <strong>the</strong><br />

collection <strong>of</strong> field data, and, fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, especially to Giinter Gollmann (University <strong>of</strong><br />

Vienna) for sharing his literature, and to Gabor Herczeg and Mihaly Foldvari (Budapest)<br />

for technical support.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

DELY, O. GY. 1996: Amphibians and reptiles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Biikk Mountains. In: Mahunka, S. (ed):<br />

The fauna <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bukk National Park. Vol. 2. Hungarian Natural History Museum,<br />

Budapest: 535-572.<br />

GOLLMANN, G. 1987: Bombina bombina and Bombina variegata in <strong>the</strong> Matra mountains:<br />

New data on distribution and hybridization. Amphibia-Reptilia 8: 213-224.<br />

f GOLLMANN, G., ROTH, P. & HODL, W. 1986: Hybridization between <strong>the</strong> Fire-bellied toads<br />

Bombina bombina and Bombina variegata in <strong>the</strong> karst regions <strong>of</strong> Slovakia and<br />

Hungary: morphological and allozyme evidence. Journal <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology<br />

1:3-14.<br />

MEHELY, L. 1891: A magyar fauna Bombinatorjai es egy uj Triton (Molge) faj hazankbol.<br />

MTA Ma<strong>the</strong>matikai es Termeszettudomanyi Kozlemenyek 24: 553-574. (in


VOROS, KORSOS & SZALAY BJOta 3/1-2,2002 179<br />

Hungarian)<br />

MERELY, L. 1892: Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Bombinator-Arten, sowie deren Standorte und<br />

Verbreitung in Ungarn. Ma<strong>the</strong>matische und Naturwissenschaftliche Berichte aus<br />

Ungarn 10: 55-79.<br />

MF.HELY, L. 1904: A Mecsekhegyseg es a Kapela herpetologiai viszonyai. Allattarvi<br />

Kozlemengek 3: 241-289. In Hungarian.<br />

PODANI, J. 1997: Bevezetes a tobbvaltozos biologiai adatfeltaras rejtelmeibe. -Budapest,<br />

412 pp. In Hungarian<br />

STATISTICA FOR WINDOWS, Version 5., StatS<strong>of</strong>t, Inc.<br />

SZYMURA, J. M. 1993: Analysis <strong>of</strong> hybrid zones with Bombina. In: Harrison, R. G. (ed.).<br />

Hybrid zones and <strong>the</strong> evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York,<br />

Oxford, pp. 261-289.<br />

VOROS, J. 2000: A comparative morphological study on Hungarian Fire-bellied and Yellowbellied<br />

toad (Bombina spp.) populations. M. Sc. Thesis, Szent Istvan University,<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science, Institut for Zoology, Budapest, 38 pp. In Hungarian.


ZAVADIL & SIZLING Biota 3/1-2. 2002 181<br />

Morphological variability in <strong>the</strong><br />

newts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cristatus group<br />

Vit ZAVADIL1 & Arnost L SIZLING1,2<br />

Agency for Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic,<br />

Kalicnicka 4-6, Praha 3, 130 00, Czech Republic<br />

E-mail: zavadil@nature.cz,<br />

2Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science at Charles' University, Department <strong>of</strong> Philosophy and History <strong>of</strong><br />

Science, Vinicna 7, Praha 2, 128 44, Czech Republic<br />

E-mail: arnost.l.sizling@seznam.cz<br />

Abstract<br />

Between 1993 and 2000, a sample <strong>of</strong> 646 individuals belonging to <strong>the</strong> T. cristatus<br />

group were collected and measured at sites in <strong>the</strong> Czech and Slovak Republics.<br />

Additionally, 26 individuals <strong>of</strong> T. carnifex from Italy and Slovenia, 8 <strong>of</strong> T. dobrogicus<br />

from Hungary and Rumania, and 6 <strong>of</strong> T. karelinifrom Turkey were collected for <strong>the</strong> purposes<br />

<strong>of</strong> comparison with <strong>the</strong> newts determined as T. carnifex and T. dobrogicus in <strong>the</strong><br />

Czech and Slovak Republics. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se individuals were measured with manual callipers<br />

under anaes<strong>the</strong>sia by <strong>the</strong> same person to <strong>the</strong> nearest 0.05 mm in <strong>the</strong> standardised<br />

manner.<br />

The quantities measured were W (weight), L (snout-vent-length), Led (length <strong>of</strong> tail),<br />

L.c. (length <strong>of</strong> head), Pa (average length <strong>of</strong> forelimbs), Pp (average length <strong>of</strong><br />

hindlimbs), LiE (interlimb distance), and Ltc (width <strong>of</strong> head). The colours <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body<br />

and <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crest were also recorded. The hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that <strong>the</strong> Wolterstorff<br />

Index (Wl) - which is counted as 100*Pa/LiE - separates <strong>the</strong> crested newt group into<br />

single species has been tested. As expected, T. dobrogicus is <strong>the</strong> only species that Wl is<br />

able to discriminate. However, we received <strong>the</strong> most significant results using modified<br />

Wl calculated as 100*Pa/(LiE+6) for males and 100*Pa/(LiE+22) for females.<br />

Key words: news, Cristatus group, Wolterstorff Index<br />

Received 28 February 2002; accepted 10 May 2002


182 Biota "5/i-a, aooa ZAVADIL & SIZLING<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Until recently, Triturus cristatus newts<br />

were supposed to be <strong>the</strong> only representatives<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> T. cristatus group in <strong>the</strong><br />

Czech Republic (Rocek 1992). In 1993,<br />

Triturus dobrogicus was morphologically<br />

determined in south Moravia at <strong>the</strong> confluence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Morava and Dyje rivers;<br />

pro<strong>of</strong> in accordance with ELFO followed<br />

almost immediately (Zavadil et al. 1994).<br />

In 1997, newts showing features typical<br />

Table 1. Measured values.<br />

<strong>of</strong> T. carnifex were found near <strong>the</strong> town<br />

<strong>of</strong> Znojmo, at a site close to <strong>the</strong> border<br />

with Austria (Zavadil & Reiter unpubl.).<br />

Three years later, morphological analysis<br />

conducted by Pialek et al. (2000) proved<br />

that <strong>the</strong> observed population belongs to<br />

T. carnifex. ELFO analysis by Horak &<br />

Pialek (1999) determined <strong>the</strong> subpopulations<br />

as hybrids T. carnifex x T. cristatus<br />

and T. cristatus x T. dobrogicus.<br />

This evidence <strong>of</strong> morphological variability<br />

Short Name Fool Name Unit<br />

W Weight grams<br />

L snout-vent-length millimetres<br />

Led length <strong>of</strong> tail millimetres<br />

L.c.l length <strong>of</strong> head millimetres<br />

L.c. 2 length <strong>of</strong> head millimetres<br />

Pa average length <strong>of</strong> forelimbs millimetres<br />

Pp average length <strong>of</strong> hindlimbs millimetres<br />

LiE interlimb distance millimetres<br />

Ltc width <strong>of</strong> head millimetres<br />

Sp. oc. inter eyes distance millimetres<br />

Cr. max. cd. maximally width <strong>of</strong> tail millimetres<br />

Lc2<br />

Lc 1<br />

Figure 1. Measured values. See also Table 1.<br />

Led


ZAVADIL & SIZLING BJOLa 3/1-2, aooa 183<br />

motivated us to start research at multiple<br />

sites in <strong>the</strong> Czech and Slovak Republics.<br />

In this paper we try to answer <strong>the</strong> following<br />

questions, which can help resolve<br />

issues concerning <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> T. cristatus<br />

behind <strong>the</strong> Alps and T. dobrogicus at <strong>the</strong><br />

edge <strong>of</strong> its range:<br />

Are <strong>the</strong> Czech populations <strong>of</strong> T. carnifex<br />

and T. dobrogicus morphologically different<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Czech population <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

cristatus?<br />

Are <strong>the</strong> Czech populations <strong>of</strong> T. carnifex<br />

and T. dobrogicus (which are considered<br />

as marginal or isolated) morphologically<br />

different from <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

carnifex and T. dobrogicus populations in<br />

core areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir distributions?<br />

Is <strong>the</strong>re any geographic variability in body<br />

shape within <strong>the</strong> T. cristatus group?<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Between 1993 and 2000, 646 individuals<br />

belonging to <strong>the</strong> T. cristatus group were<br />

measured at sites in <strong>the</strong> Czech and Slovak<br />

Republics. For <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> comparison<br />

with <strong>the</strong> newts determined <strong>the</strong>re as<br />

T. carnifex and T. dobrogicus, an additional<br />

26 individuals <strong>of</strong> T. carnifex from<br />

Slovenia and Italy, 8 <strong>of</strong> T. dobrogicus<br />

from Hungary and Rumania, and 6 <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

karelinii from Turkey were examined.<br />

Since inaccuracy may be caused when<br />

measurements are taken by different persons<br />

or on animals conserved in alcohol<br />

(Arntzen & Wallis 1994), all <strong>the</strong> individuals<br />

were measured with manual callipers<br />

by <strong>the</strong> same person to <strong>the</strong> nearest 0.05<br />

mm in <strong>the</strong> standardised manner and<br />

under anaes<strong>the</strong>sia. The anaes<strong>the</strong>tic used<br />

was 0.8% water solution <strong>of</strong> phenoxyethanol<br />

(0.8 millilitre <strong>of</strong> phenoxyethanol<br />

in 1 litre <strong>of</strong> water).<br />

In accordance with a suggestion <strong>of</strong><br />

Klepsch (1994), measurements were<br />

taken <strong>of</strong> weight (W), snout-vent-length<br />

(L), length <strong>of</strong> tail (Led), length <strong>of</strong> head<br />

Figure 2. The localities; large rings show sites on which <strong>the</strong> large samples were collected.


184 Biota 3/1-2,2002 ZAVADIL & SIZLING<br />

(I.e.), average length <strong>of</strong> forelimbs (Pa),<br />

average length <strong>of</strong> hindlimbs (Pp), interlimb<br />

distance (LiE), width <strong>of</strong> head (Ltc),<br />

distance between eyelids (Sp. oc) and<br />

maximum width <strong>of</strong> tail (cr. max. cd.) (see<br />

Table 1, Figure 1). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong><br />

colouring <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body and <strong>the</strong> existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crest were recorded.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> first three years, <strong>the</strong> studied<br />

sites in <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic were chosen<br />

randomly. Later on, as we focused on differences<br />

between <strong>the</strong> T. cristatus and T.<br />

dobrogicus species, we concentrated on<br />

localities <strong>of</strong> T. cristatus remote from areas<br />

inhabited by T. dobrogicus and on localities<br />

situated at higher altitudes.<br />

Since 1997, we have focused on sites<br />

around <strong>the</strong> town <strong>of</strong> Znojmo, where <strong>the</strong> T.<br />

carnifex had been found; since 1998 we<br />

have examined sites in Slovakia situated<br />

on <strong>the</strong> border between <strong>the</strong> ranges <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

cristatus and T. dobrogicus (see Figure 2).<br />

We used <strong>the</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> Principal<br />

Component (PCA) for comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

samples from locations within <strong>the</strong> former<br />

Yugoslavia (Kalezic 1990) and <strong>the</strong><br />

Wolterstorff Index (Wl) for comparison<br />

with <strong>the</strong> results presented by Wolterstorff<br />

(1924), Arntzen & Wallis (1994) and<br />

Pialek et al. (2000).<br />

Since nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> methods could satisfactorily<br />

show <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a morphometric<br />

difference between T. cristatus<br />

and T. carnifex, we decided to use <strong>the</strong><br />

Discriminant Analysis (DA) and <strong>the</strong> Cube<br />

Analysis (dividing <strong>the</strong> W-L-Lcd-L.c.-Pa-<br />

Pp-LiE-Ltc-Sp.oc.-cr.max.cd. space into<br />

three coherent areas consisting <strong>of</strong> bond<br />

cubes; see Appendix).<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> best results were reached<br />

by a modification <strong>of</strong> Wl, which we<br />

named Intensified Wolterstorff Index<br />

(i-WI; see below).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Multivariate analyses<br />

Three accomplished multivariate analyses<br />

(PCA, Discriminant Analysis and Cube<br />

Analysis - see Appendix) were used to<br />

measure morphological and geographical<br />

differences between studied species. The<br />

results <strong>of</strong> PCA are concordant with <strong>the</strong><br />

works <strong>of</strong> Kalezic et al. (1990) and Pialek<br />

& Zavadil (1997); however, <strong>the</strong> clusters<br />

shown in our study were larger and consequently<br />

overlapped. To obtain <strong>the</strong> best<br />

result using Discriminant Analysis we<br />

reduced measured variables so that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were linearly independent (we used all<br />

variables except W and L) and used a<br />

quadratic model because <strong>of</strong> inequality <strong>of</strong><br />

covariance matrices and transformed<br />

axes to normalize its distribution and<br />

eliminate allometry. However, even when<br />

all assumptions <strong>of</strong> DA were met as accurately<br />

as possible, we did not obtain significantly<br />

better results (measured in percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> successful determination) than<br />

we obtained using only Pa and LiE variables.<br />

This result suggests that <strong>the</strong>se two<br />

variables are adequate, but in <strong>the</strong> end we<br />

constructed and carried out <strong>the</strong> Cube<br />

Analysis to guarantee this result.<br />

Therefore, we concentrate on <strong>the</strong>se two<br />

variables in <strong>the</strong> following text.<br />

Wl analysis<br />

Wolterstorff Index (Wl) analysis is a classical<br />

method used to identify species<br />

belonging to <strong>the</strong> T. cristatus group. It is<br />

defined as 100*Pa/LiE. Though <strong>the</strong> Wl is<br />

very helpful for <strong>the</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

dobrogicus, it is not satisfactory for distinguishing<br />

between T. cristatus and T.<br />

carnifex (Kalezic et al. 1990, Arntzen &<br />

Wallis 1994, 1999). The problem is that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Wl decreases with growing body<br />

length (see Figure 3 where <strong>the</strong> Wl corresponds<br />

to <strong>the</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dotted lines).<br />

When studying <strong>the</strong> Pa-LiE space (see<br />

Figure 3), we realised that <strong>the</strong> decrease in<br />

observed Wl was related to ineffective<br />

distinction between <strong>the</strong> two species.<br />

There is linearity between Pa and LiE, but<br />

<strong>the</strong> borderlines/regression lines do not<br />

attain zero. This could be caused by a dif-


ZAVADIL & SIZLING 3/1-2, 2OO2 185<br />

Figure 3. Males-top, Females-bottom. There is a difference between Wl dotted lines<br />

and i-WI <strong>full</strong> lines in Figs, a, b: rings correspond to T. carnifex, filled circles to T. cristatus,<br />

triangles to T. dobrogicus and sharps to T. karelinii; sharps inside <strong>the</strong> circles mark<br />

external individuals <strong>of</strong> T. ca. (I, SLO) and diamonds external individuals <strong>of</strong> T. do. (H,<br />

RO).<br />

[interlimb Distance (LIE) in mms<br />

<strong>full</strong> lines (i-WI) does not attain zero<br />

dotted lines (Wl) attain zero<br />

ferent rate <strong>of</strong> growth in <strong>the</strong> larvae stage.<br />

It is shown on Figure 3 where <strong>the</strong> dotted<br />

lines correspond to Wl and <strong>the</strong> coloured<br />

lines correspond to <strong>the</strong> intensified Wl,<br />

which is calculated as 100*Pa/(LiE+22)<br />

for females and 100*Pa/(LiE+6) for males<br />

(see Appendix). The classical way to eliminate<br />

allometry helping <strong>the</strong> logarithm<br />

Interlimb Distance (LiE) in mms<br />

function appears to be less powerful.<br />

Box and Whisker plot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> i-WI is<br />

shown in Figure 4 and <strong>the</strong> effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> discrimination in Table 2.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> i-WI should turn out to increase<br />

with growing length measures, it is probably<br />

caused by <strong>the</strong> simplification <strong>of</strong> its<br />

original form, which is ATN(Pa/(LiE+22))


186 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 ZAVADIL & SIZLING<br />

Figure 4. Males-top, Females-bottom. Box and whisker plot <strong>of</strong> i-WI for different localities.<br />

The size <strong>of</strong> sample "n" is for males 12 for site 1041, 21 for1161, 13for1171,31<br />

for 1181, 15 for 1211, 12 for 1291, 6 for 1351, 8 for 1401, 22 for 1411, 4 for 1421, 6<br />

for 1451, 15 for 1491, 6 for 2021, 7 for 2051, 7 for 2061, 11 for 2071, 1 for 3011, 1<br />

for 4011, 11 for 5011, 2 for 6021 and 4 for 7011. For females <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> sample "n"<br />

is 4 for 1041, 17 for 1171, 22 for 1181, 14 for 1211, 10 for 1291, 9 for 1351, 8 for<br />

1391, 4 for 1401, 30 for 1411, 9 for 1451, 9 for 1481, 5 for 1491, 9 for 2021, 9 for<br />

2061, 6 for 2071, 3 for 3011, 3 for 4011, 10 for 5011, 2 for 6021 and 2 for 7011.<br />

cu<br />

1041 1171 1211 1351 1411 1451 2021 2061 3011 5011 7011<br />

1161 1181 1291 1401 1421 1491 2051 2071 4011 6021<br />

1041 1181 1291 1391 1411 1481 2021 2071 4011 6021<br />

1171 1211 1351 1401 1451 1491 2061 3011 5011 7011


ZAVADIL & SIZLING Biota 3 i-2,2002 187<br />

Table 2. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> i-WI Analysis.<br />

MALES; i-WI = 100*Pa/(LiE+6) % <strong>of</strong> Successful<br />

Determination<br />

Species T. ca. T. cr. T.do.<br />

T. ca. 45 9 0<br />

83<br />

T. cr. 7 135 0<br />

95<br />

T.do. 0 4 68<br />

94<br />

FEMALES; i-WI = 100*Pa/(LiE+22)<br />

T. ca. T. cr. T.do.<br />

T. ca. 35 7 0<br />

83<br />

T. cr. 1 154 8<br />

94<br />

T.do. 0 0 67<br />

100<br />

Table 3. Threshold values for Wl and i-WI according to different authors; many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

were taken from graphs<br />

WI - Threshold value<br />

Males<br />

Females<br />

T. karelinii<br />

T. carnifex<br />

T. cristatus<br />

T. dobrogicus<br />

T. karelinii<br />

T. carnifex<br />

T. cristatus<br />

T. dobrogicus<br />

Our Study i-WI<br />

from to<br />

55.5<br />

45.5<br />

32<br />

35.3<br />

28.7<br />

22<br />

63<br />

55.5<br />

45.5<br />

40<br />

35.3<br />

28.7<br />

Our Study Wl<br />

from to<br />

70 75<br />

60 75<br />

50 69<br />

38 55<br />

60 65<br />

50 65<br />

32 61<br />

30 ' 45<br />

for females and ATN(Pa/(LiE+6)) for<br />

males, where ATM is <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical<br />

function arc tangent. However, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

good statistical evidence that <strong>the</strong> i-WI<br />

increases with growing width sizes (Pa,<br />

Pp, Ltc, P < 0.05). All results remained<br />

unchanged when <strong>the</strong> data for subadult<br />

individuals had been added.<br />

The thresholds <strong>of</strong> Wl and i-WI can be<br />

found in Table 3. The evidence that <strong>the</strong><br />

Wl is higher for males than for females is<br />

much stronger for samples collected<br />

within single sites than for samples collected<br />

on more sites (see Figure 4).<br />

Geographical variability<br />

We have no evidence for morphological<br />

difference between <strong>the</strong> Czech population<br />

<strong>of</strong> T. carnifex and populations <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

Wolterstorff 1924<br />

From to<br />

69 82<br />

63 73<br />

59.8 65<br />

45 52<br />

67.5 72<br />

52 64<br />

49 54<br />

34 45<br />

Kalezicetal.1990 Arntzen & Walis 1994<br />

from to from to<br />

69 81 57 67<br />

63 73 49 64<br />

55 65 44 62<br />

45 51 35 46<br />

61 72 57 67<br />

54 65 49 64<br />

45 54 44 62<br />

34 45 35 46<br />

carnifex south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alps and T. dobrogicus<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Czech and Slovak Republics<br />

and <strong>the</strong> same species abroad. This is<br />

because we have no evidence that for <strong>the</strong><br />

same species, <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong><br />

Czech population and populations<br />

abroad is bigger than <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

among Czech populations (see Figure 4).<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>re are sites where <strong>the</strong> same<br />

species <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> T. carnifex group show a<br />

statistically different body shape (see<br />

Figure 4), it would not be correct to speak<br />

about geographical variability. The reason<br />

is that no correspondence was found<br />

between <strong>the</strong> shape (i-WI and <strong>the</strong> results<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Discriminant Analyses) and any<br />

geographical attribute (altitude, <strong>the</strong> distance<br />

between sites or any direction, as,<br />

for example, East, West, SE, etc.).


188 Biota 3/i-a, 2002 ZAVADIL & SIZLING<br />

A sound hypo<strong>the</strong>sis seems to be that <strong>the</strong><br />

morphological differences between particular<br />

sites can be caused by different<br />

densities <strong>of</strong> larvae predators (Schmidt &<br />

Van Buskirk2001).<br />

Appendix<br />

The Analysis <strong>of</strong> Principal Components<br />

(PCA) transforms <strong>the</strong> axes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> examined<br />

orthogonal space in order to show<br />

clusters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studied samples. If it is not<br />

possible to see any clusters, <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />

evidence for <strong>the</strong>ir absence. The PCA was<br />

used for data analyses in <strong>the</strong> works <strong>of</strong><br />

Kalezic et al. (1990) and Pialek & Zavadil<br />

(1997).<br />

The Discriminant Analysis calculates a<br />

number D for a case (a single newt), and<br />

for each group <strong>of</strong> a studied sample (TV<br />

cristatus, T. carnifex, T. dobrogicus). The<br />

group with <strong>the</strong> lowest D is assumed to be<br />

<strong>the</strong> group into which <strong>the</strong> case (newt)<br />

belongs.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cube Analysis is to<br />

divide morphometric space into two continuous<br />

parts, which contain ei<strong>the</strong>r T.<br />

cristatus or T. carnifex individuals. In <strong>the</strong><br />

case <strong>of</strong> ten-dimensional space it would be<br />

very difficult, so in <strong>the</strong> beginning we<br />

reduced <strong>the</strong> data with <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> PCA<br />

(<strong>the</strong> axes with <strong>the</strong> lowest variability are<br />

eliminated). After data reduction, we<br />

divided <strong>the</strong> reduced space into optimal<br />

size cubes, in <strong>the</strong> same way that biologists<br />

divide maps into quadrants for<br />

quadrant mapping. The optimal size <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> cubes was taken empirically by testing<br />

various sizes. The cubes create three<br />

continuous areas: <strong>the</strong> first one contains<br />

only T. carnifex, <strong>the</strong> second one only T.<br />

cristatus, and <strong>the</strong> third one consists <strong>of</strong><br />

cubes in which both species could be<br />

found. This algorithm was applied subsequently<br />

on <strong>the</strong> third area.<br />

Wl and i-WI analyses. In Figure 1 in<br />

Arntzen & Wallis (1994) <strong>the</strong> T. cristatus<br />

and T. marmoratus are plotted in Pa-LiE<br />

state space. Making <strong>the</strong> best line for distinguishing<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two species<br />

(error <strong>of</strong> determination in percent is <strong>the</strong><br />

lowest) and extrapolating it, we realized<br />

that <strong>the</strong> line does not attain zero and so it<br />

can not represent a threshold for <strong>the</strong> Wl.<br />

This is because <strong>the</strong> formula Wl =<br />

1QO*Pa/LiE is <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r form for a line<br />

which attains zero. The form <strong>of</strong> this line<br />

can be written as Pa = (WI/100)*LiE.<br />

This phenomenon is also clearly apparent<br />

in our data (see Figure 3). It means that<br />

threshold lines in <strong>the</strong> Pa-LiE state space<br />

do not attain zero, and <strong>the</strong> common form<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se lines must be Pa =<br />

(i-WI/100)*LiE+b, where b represents<br />

<strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> intersection with <strong>the</strong> Pa axis.<br />

This equation can be written as i-WI =<br />

100*Pa/(LiE+c) where c is computed for<br />

males and females separately (b =<br />

c*[i-WI/100]). The number i-WI we call<br />

intensified Wolterstorff index.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Special thanks to J. Pialek, D. Weber-Obdrzalkova, Jan Sula and Lukas Kratochvfl for<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir assistance and to P. Belansky, D. Cogalniceanu, P. Dolezal, A. Horak, M. Kaftan, J.<br />

Kautman, S. Koukal, A/I. Macholan, K. Poboljsaj, Puky M., A. Reitr, K. Rozfnek, R.<br />

Rozinek, A. Ruxova, R. Zajfcek and J. Zima for <strong>the</strong>ir help during <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

data sample.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ARNTZEN, J., W. & WALLIS, G., P. 1994: The "Wolterstorff index' and its value to <strong>the</strong> taxonomy<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Crested Newt superspecies. In: Bisch<strong>of</strong>f, W., Bohme, W. &<br />

Bottcher, I. (eds.): Okologie und Stammesgeschichte der Schwanzlurche. Abh.


ZAVADIL & SIZLING Biota 3/1-2,2002 189<br />

Ber. Naturk., Magdeburg 17: 57-66<br />

ARNTZEN,)., W. & WALLIS, G.f P. 1999: Geographic variation and taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Crested<br />

Newts (Triturus cristatus superspecies): morphological and mitochondrial DNA<br />

data. Contrib. Zool. 68: 181-203.<br />

HORAK, A.r PlALEK, J. 1999: Genetic structure <strong>of</strong> crested newts (Triturus cristatus superspecies)<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic. Abstr. in 10th OGM SEN, Irakleio, 6.-10.<br />

September 1999: 70-71.<br />

KALEZlC M.r L.r DZUKlC G., STAMENKOVlC S., CRNOBRNJA, J. 1990: Morphometrics <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> crested newt (Triturus cristatus complex) from Yugoslavia: relevance for taxonomy.<br />

Arch. biol. nauka, Beograd 42: 17-37.<br />

KLEPSCH, L. 1994: Zur Artdifferenzierung der Kammolche (Tr/furuscr/steft/s-Artenkreis) im<br />

Waldviertel: Morphometrische und molekulargenetische Untersuchungen.<br />

Diplomarbeit, Universitat Wien.<br />

PlALEK , J., ZAVADIL, V. 1997: Morphological differentiation between members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Triturus cristatus superspecies in <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic. In: Rocek, Z. & Hart, S.<br />

(eds.): Herpetology '97: 162.<br />

PlALEK, J., ZAVADIL, V., VALICKOVA, R. 2000: Morphological evidence for <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

Triturus carnifex in <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic. Folia Zoologica 49: 33-40.<br />

ROCEK, Z. 1992: Triturus cristatus (Laurenti, 1768) - colek velky. In: Barus, V. & Oliva, O.<br />

(eds.): Obojzivelnici, Amphibia. Fauna CSFR, Vol. 25. Academia, Praha: 115-122.<br />

SCHMIDT, B. R. & VAN BUSKIRK, J. 2001: Verhalten, Wachstum und Morphologie von<br />

Kammolch-Larven in der An- und Abwesenheit von Libellenlarven. In: Krone, A.<br />

(ed.): Der Kammolch (Triturus cristatus) Okologie und Bestandssituation. Rana,<br />

Sonderheft 4, Rangsdorf.<br />

WOLTERSTORFF, W. 1924: Uberfcicht der Unterarten und Formen des Triton cristatus Laur.<br />

Bl. Aquar.Terrarkde 33: 120-126.<br />

ZAVADIL, V., PlALEK, J. & KLEPSCH, L. 1994: Extension <strong>of</strong> known range <strong>of</strong> Triturus<br />

dobrogicus: electrophoretic and morphological evidence for presence in <strong>the</strong><br />

Czech Republic. Amphibia-Reptilia 15: 329-335.


ZUFFI, CENTILUI, RAZZETTI & SCALI Biota 3/1-2. 2002 191<br />

Transition-hybridization areas in<br />

parapatric species <strong>of</strong> Vipera aspis<br />

group from nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy<br />

Marco A.L ZUFFI1*P Augusto GENTILLI2,<br />

Edoardo RAZZETTI2 & Stefano SCALP<br />

'"Corresponding author: Museo di Storia Naturale e del Territorio, University <strong>of</strong> Pisa, via<br />

Roma 79, 1-56011 Calci (Pisa)-Italy<br />

E-mail: marcoz@museo.unipi.it<br />

2Dip. Biologia Animale, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, p.za Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy<br />

3Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, c.so Venezia 55, 20121 Milano-ltaly<br />

Abstract<br />

There is evidence <strong>of</strong> some contact between <strong>the</strong> parapatric species <strong>of</strong> Vipera aspis, Italian<br />

V. aspis and Vipera atra Meisner, 1820 along a North-South oriented sector, from about<br />

8°45' to 9° 20' Longitude East. V. atra from north-western Italy is characterized by a<br />

high number <strong>of</strong> ventral scales and dorsal bars, and by a distinct morphological pattern<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hemipenes that has elongated lobes, mostly covered by short and small spines,<br />

while V. aspis has a relatively lower number <strong>of</strong> ventral scales and dorsal bars, and<br />

hemipenes that show large lobes with <strong>the</strong> upper part completely covered by a calyculate<br />

area. The intermediate specimens appear to be more similar to V.aspis than to V.<br />

atra.<br />

Key words: Vipera aspis (species group), nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italy, contact zones.<br />

Received: 3 October 2001; accepted 12 April 2002


192 Biota 3/1-2,2002 ZUFFI, GENTILLI, RAZZETTI & SCALI<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Paleontological and molecular biology<br />

data indicate that <strong>the</strong> small vipers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

western Palaearctic region, including <strong>the</strong><br />

Sand viper, Vipera ammodytes, and <strong>the</strong><br />

Asp viper, Vipera aspis, represent a complex<br />

<strong>of</strong> phylogenetically closely related<br />

taxa (Herrmann & Joger 1997, Lenk et al.<br />

2001).<br />

The Asp viper, with regards to colour<br />

morphs and dorsal markings, is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

most variable snakes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Palaearctic<br />

region (Physalix 1968, Brodmann 1987).<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> several subspecies which<br />

have been described in <strong>the</strong> past (cf. Saint<br />

Girons 1997), only atra, frandsciredi,<br />

hugyi, zinnikeri and <strong>the</strong> nominal aspis<br />

have been accepted (Zuffi & Bonnet<br />

1999) (Figure 1). More recently, some <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se taxa have been recognised as good<br />

species (Zuffi 2002) and <strong>the</strong>y form part <strong>of</strong><br />

interest <strong>of</strong> this contribution. Inter and<br />

intra-population analysis <strong>of</strong> life history<br />

traits represents one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most fascinating<br />

approaches towards <strong>the</strong> description<br />

and <strong>the</strong> comprehension <strong>of</strong> phenotypic<br />

plasticity (Seigel & Fitch 1985, Bonnet &<br />

Naulleau 1996, Shine 2000, Luiselli &<br />

Zuffi 2002). The high morphological variability<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Asp viper, and <strong>the</strong> wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> habitats in which this species<br />

lives (Saint Girons 1997), <strong>of</strong>fer an opportunity<br />

for multidisciplinary studies in evolutionary<br />

biology.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> ventral and<br />

caudal scales <strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Italian Vipera<br />

aspis shows, within a North-South oriented<br />

sector (from about 8°45 to 9°20'<br />

Longitude East), that V. aspis specimens<br />

display intermediate characters between<br />

those <strong>of</strong> V. atra and <strong>of</strong> Italian V. aspis.<br />

This geographic sector extends from <strong>the</strong><br />

western and eastern sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ticino<br />

river, from <strong>the</strong> Maggiore lake to <strong>the</strong> confluence<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Po river; from <strong>the</strong> Ticino-<br />

Po confluence southwards to <strong>the</strong> begin-<br />

Figure 1. Present distribution <strong>of</strong> European Vipera aspis subspecies.<br />

40° lat N<br />

frandsciredi<br />

500 Km


ZUFFI, GENTILLI, RAZZETTI & SCALI Biota 3/1-2,2002 193<br />

Figure 2. Contact zone between Vipera atra and Italian V. aspis. Circles = atra; Boxes =<br />

Italian aspis; Crosses = intermediate individuals<br />

ning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apennines; and along a relatively<br />

large area that connects, along a<br />

virtual line, <strong>the</strong> towns <strong>of</strong> Voghera,<br />

Tortona, Novi Ligure, and Genoa.<br />

This contribution presents <strong>the</strong> first available<br />

morphological data on V. aspis populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> two distinct species, i.e. Vipera<br />

atra and Italian Vipera aspis from northwestern<br />

Italy, along a western-eastern<br />

transect, passing through <strong>the</strong> border<br />

between <strong>the</strong> species (Figure 2). We present<br />

data documenting <strong>the</strong> parapatric<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> two species <strong>of</strong> V. aspis<br />

along with a limited number <strong>of</strong> intermediates.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

173 vipers (55 V. atra. 104 V. aspis, 14<br />

intermediate specimens), (Zuffi & Bonnet<br />

1999, Zuffi 2002) were studied for <strong>the</strong><br />

following characteristics: snout-vent<br />

length (SVL), tail length (tL), total length<br />

(TL), ventral scales (VS), subcaudal scales<br />

(CS), total scales (TOTS), bars or blotches<br />

or spots on <strong>the</strong> dorsal left side (BARS).<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> strong sexual dimorphism,<br />

analyses were considered for each sex<br />

separately. 22 vipers were analysed for<br />

hemipenial morphology as described in<br />

Zuffi (2002). Moreover, 35 individuals<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Enrica Calabresi herpetological<br />

collection (University <strong>of</strong> Florence) were<br />

examined for differences in skull morphology.<br />

Calabresi (1924) pointed out<br />

that <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> parietal and basisphenoid<br />

bones are quite characteristic in<br />

Italian V. aspis subspecies. We used differences<br />

in <strong>the</strong> parietal and basisphenoid<br />

morphology to evaluate <strong>the</strong> skulls.<br />

Parietal bone shows a different pattern<br />

for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two species: i) in V. atra<br />

<strong>the</strong> parietal does not show any bony<br />

crest; ii) in V. aspis <strong>of</strong> Italy lateral bony<br />

crests are typically present, and <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

convergent posteriorly contacting each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r in "V" shaped crests. Basisphenoid<br />

bones show different patterns in each<br />

species: i) in V. atra <strong>the</strong> proximal portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bone, at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> postorbitals,<br />

is a romboid shaped crest that con-


194 Biota 3/1-2,2002 ZUFFI, GENTILLI, RAZZETTI & SCALI<br />

tinues posteriorly as a longitudinal narrow<br />

crest, forming a single process, ending at<br />

<strong>the</strong> basioccipital suture; in ii) V. aspis<br />

such a ventral pattern is generally absent;<br />

<strong>the</strong> proximal part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basisphenoid in<br />

V. aspis possesses a narrow longitudinal<br />

crest that continues, in <strong>the</strong> distal part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> basisphenoid bone, as a small romboid<br />

shaped crest. Body size parameters<br />

were analysed to evaluate <strong>the</strong> variation<br />

along <strong>the</strong> transect, without regard to taxonomic<br />

status <strong>of</strong> each specimen. After<br />

this we used additional characteristics to<br />

assign taxonomic status as V. atra or V.<br />

aspis or as intermediate. The original data<br />

set was log-transformed to avoid <strong>the</strong><br />

effect <strong>of</strong> allometry; data were <strong>the</strong>n tested<br />

for normality. We used SPSS 8.0 PC to<br />

analyse our data. All tests were two tailed<br />

and we chose P = 0.05 as our level <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Body size features<br />

There was no significant difference in SVL<br />

or in TL between V. atra and V. aspis<br />

males and females. Vipera atra males differed<br />

in CS and TOTS when compared to<br />

females (males CS: 43.7 ± 3.1, N=23,<br />

males TOTS: 198 ± 5, N = 23; vs. females<br />

CS: 37.6 ± 3.4, N = 28, females TOTS:<br />

192.3 ± 5, N = 27; Student t test = 6.569,<br />

49 df, P < 0.001, and t = 4.001, 48 df, P<br />

< 0.0001). Vipera aspis males differed<br />

significantly from females in VS (146.6 ±<br />

3.4, N = 35, vs. 150.4+ 3.7, N = 66,<br />

Student t test = -4.813, 103 df, P =<br />

0.0001), CS (42 ± 2.5, N = 32 vs. 33.9 ±<br />

2.3, N = 65, Student t test = 15.894, 99<br />

df, P = 0.0001, p), TOTS (188.4 ± 3.9, N<br />

= 31, vs. 184.3 ± 4.1, N = 63, Student t<br />

test = 4.726, 96 df, P = 0.0001), and<br />

BARS (40.7 ± 2.1, N = 24, vs. 43.7 ± 3.8,<br />

N = 36, Student t test = -2.435, 62 df, P<br />

= 0.018) respectively. Vipera aspis males<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intermediate form differed from<br />

females in CS (44 ± 2.5, N = 5, vs. 36.1 ±<br />

2.1, N = 8, Student t test = 3.8, 15 df, P<br />

= 0.002).<br />

Vipera atra males possessed a significantly<br />

higher number <strong>of</strong> ventrals, subcaudals,<br />

totals and dorsal bars ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Italian V.<br />

aspis specimens (VS, TOTS, BARS, P =<br />

0.0001; CS, P = 0.031; One-Way<br />

ANOVA, LSD multirange test), or those<br />

<strong>of</strong> intermediate specimens (VS, TOTS,<br />

BARS, P = 0.0001). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand,<br />

V. aspis <strong>of</strong> Italy and <strong>the</strong> individuals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

intermediate form were close to each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r for VS (P = 0.095); CS (P = 0.786);<br />

TOTS (P = 0.259) and BARS (P = 0.22).<br />

Vipera atra females had a significantly<br />

higher number <strong>of</strong> ventrals, subcaudals,<br />

totals and dorsal bars than V. aspis specimens<br />

(VS, CS, TOTS.BARS, P = 0.0001),<br />

as well as <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> ventrals, totals<br />

and dorsal bars <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intermediate specimens<br />

(VS, P = 0.004; TOTS, P = 0.002;<br />

BARS, P = 0.016).<br />

Skull morphology<br />

We did not observe any appreciable sexual<br />

differences in <strong>the</strong> skull morphology <strong>of</strong><br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> parietal or basisphenoid bones.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> study area we found that <strong>the</strong> V. a.<br />

atra pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parietal bone occurs in<br />

87.5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aspis classified individuals<br />

(N = 8); <strong>the</strong> V. aspis pattern occurs in<br />

76% <strong>of</strong> V. aspis classified individuals (N =<br />

21). The pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intermediate<br />

specimens (N = 6) was similar to V. atra<br />

in 33.3% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cases, and to V. aspis in<br />

66.6% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cases.<br />

Hemipenial morphology<br />

Hemipenes <strong>of</strong> French V. aspis show well<br />

separated lobes, relatively longer than <strong>the</strong><br />

basal segment; <strong>the</strong> basal segment possesses<br />

large basal spines reaching <strong>the</strong><br />

bifurcation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sperm groove and<br />

medium to small sized spines up to last<br />

third to fourth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lobe with a relatively<br />

large calyculate area (Domergue 1962:<br />

98, Fig. 10, Case 1968: 98, Fig. 3, Joger<br />

et al., 1997, Zuffi 2002). In comparison,<br />

V. atra hemipenes have well separated


ZUFFI, GENTILLI, RAZZETTI & SCALI 3/1-2 195<br />

lobes that are relatively longer than <strong>the</strong><br />

basis, with large basal spines and many<br />

small spines covering both asulcated and<br />

sulcated sides up to <strong>the</strong> apex, with a very<br />

reduced calyculate area. Italiann Vipera<br />

aspis shows strong similarities to French<br />

V. aspis: it has similar basal segment and<br />

spines, medium to small spines and a relatively<br />

well defined calyculate area.<br />

However, its hemipenes are, on average,<br />

larger than those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nominal and <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r subspecies. The only one intermediate<br />

specimen examined for this characteristic<br />

shows an intermediate hemipenial<br />

morphology, sharing <strong>the</strong> features <strong>of</strong> both<br />

V. atra and V. aspis <strong>of</strong> Italy.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Vipera aspis Is highly polymorphic regarding<br />

dorsal patterns <strong>of</strong> colouration and<br />

markings (Brodmann 1987, Zuffi &<br />

Bonnet 1999). Our investigation indicates<br />

that V. atra and Italian V. aspis are distin-<br />

guishable by <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> ventrals, dorsal<br />

bars, morphology <strong>of</strong> skull bones, and<br />

hemipenial morphology. It is only in <strong>the</strong><br />

contact zone that some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m are individuals<br />

showing an intermediate pattern,<br />

more like V. aspis <strong>of</strong> Italy.<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> fact that few individuals are<br />

intermediates in morphology, our results<br />

suggest some restriction in gene flow<br />

between V. atra and Italian V. aspis.<br />

Previous works seem to indicate a strong<br />

genetic separation between <strong>the</strong>se two<br />

forms (Pozio 1980) as well as at a morphological<br />

level (Zuffi 2002) as suggested<br />

by <strong>the</strong> marked difference <strong>of</strong> hemipene<br />

morphology between <strong>the</strong>se taxa. Genetic<br />

and inter-fertility studies have not been<br />

done yet but will provide additional evidence<br />

to help determine <strong>the</strong> systematic<br />

status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two taxa.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BONNET, X. & NAULLEAU, G. 1996: Catchability in snakes: consequences for estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

breeding frequency. Can. J. Zool. 74: 233-239.<br />

BRODMANN, P. 1987: Die Giftschlangen Europas und die Gattung Vipera in Afrika und<br />

Asien. Kummerly-Frey.<br />

CALABRESI, E. 1924: Ricerche sulle variazioni della Vipera aspis Auct. in Italia. Boll. 1st. Zool.<br />

R. Univ. Roma, 2: 78-127.<br />

DOMERGUE, Ch. A. 1962: Observations sur le penis des Ophidiens. Bull. Soc. Sci. nat phys.<br />

Maroc42:87-105.<br />

GASC, J.-P. 1968: Morphologic des hemipenis chez Vipera ursinii ursinii (Bonaparte) et discussion<br />

biogeograpique sur la repartition des especes du genre Vipera en Europe<br />

occidentale. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. 40: 95-101.<br />

HERRMANN, H.-W. & JOGER, U., 1997: Evolution <strong>of</strong> viperine snakes. In: Thorpe, R.S.,<br />

Wuster, W. & Malhotra, A. Eds. Venomous Snakes: Ecology, Evolution and Snake<br />

Bite. Symp. zool. Soc. London 70: 43-61.<br />

JOGER, U., LENK, P., BARAN, I., BOHME, W., ZIEGLER, T, HEIDRICH, P. & WINK, M. 1997:<br />

The phylogenetic position <strong>of</strong> Vipera barani and V. nikolskii within <strong>the</strong> Vipera<br />

berus complex. In: Bohme, W., Bisch<strong>of</strong>f, W. & Ziegler, T. (eds). Herpetologia<br />

Bonnensis. Bonn (<strong>SEH</strong>), Germany: 185-194.<br />

LENK, P., KALYABINA, S., WINK, M. & JOGER, U. 2001: Evolutionary relationships among<br />

<strong>the</strong> true vipers (Reptilia: Viperidae) inferred from Mitochondria! DNA sequences.<br />

Molecular Phylogenetics Evolution 19: 94-104.


196 Biota 3/i-a, ZUFFI, GENTILLI, RAZZETTI & SCALI<br />

LUISELLI, L. & ZUFFI, M.A.L. 2002: Female life-history traits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aspic viper (Vipera aspis)<br />

and sand viper (V. ammodytes) from <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean region. In: Schuett<br />

G.W., Hoggren M., Douglas M.E. & Greene H.W. (eds.). Biology <strong>of</strong> Vipers.<br />

CPG/Biological Sciences Press, Carmel, Indiana: 279-284.<br />

PHISALIX, M. 1968: La livree des viperes de France. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat., Paris 4: 661-<br />

676.<br />

POZIO, E. 1980: Contributo alia sistematica di Vipera aspis (L.) mediante analisi elettr<strong>of</strong>oretica<br />

delle proteine contenute nel veleno. Natura. Soc. ital. Sci. nat., Museo civ.<br />

Stor. nat. e Acquario civ., Milano, 71: 28-34.<br />

SAINT GIRONS, H., 1997: Vipera aspis (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Case, J.P., Cabela, A.,<br />

Crnobrnja-lsailovic, J., Dolmen, D., Grossenbacher, K.r Haffner, P., Lescure, J.,<br />

Martens, H., Martinez Rica, J.P., Maurin, H., Oliveira, M.E., S<strong>of</strong>ianidou, T.S.,<br />

Veith, M. & Zuiderwijk, A. (eds). Atlas <strong>of</strong> Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe.<br />

Societas Europaea Herpetologica and Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle<br />

(IEGP/SPN), Paris: 386-387.<br />

SHINE, R. 2000: Vertebral number in male and female snakes: <strong>the</strong> roles <strong>of</strong> natural, sexual<br />

and fecundity selection. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 49-86.<br />

SEIGEL, R.A., & FITCH, S. 1985: Annual variation in reproduction in snakes in a fluctuating<br />

environment. Journal <strong>of</strong> Animal Ecology 54: 497-505.<br />

ZUFFI, M.A.L. 2002: A critique <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> systematic position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> asp viper subspecies [Vipera<br />

aspis aspis (Linne, 1758), Vipera aspis atra Meisner, 1820, Vipera aspis francisciredi<br />

Laurenti, 1768, Vipera aspis hugyi Schinz, 1833, Vipera aspis zinnikeri<br />

Kramer, 1958]. Amphibia-Reptilia 23: 191-213.<br />

ZUFFI, M.A.L. & BONNET, X. 1999: Italian subspecies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> asp viper, Vipera aspis: patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> variability and distribution. Ital. Journal <strong>of</strong> Zoology 66: 87-95.


NOVE KNJIGE/BOOK REVIEWS<br />

Cabela, A., Grillitsch, H. & Tiedemann<br />

(eds.)2001:<br />

Atlas zur Verbreitung und Okologie der<br />

Amphibien und Reptilien in Osterreich.<br />

880 pages.<br />

Hardback, ISBN 3-85457-586-6<br />

Copies can be ordered by e-mail:<br />

groeger@ubavie.gv.at<br />

Price: 66.9 EURO (plus postage)<br />

This massive <strong>book</strong>, measuring 21 x 27 cm<br />

and weighing much more than 2 kg,<br />

reflects <strong>the</strong> efforts <strong>of</strong> a team <strong>of</strong> three<br />

main researchers at <strong>the</strong> Natural History<br />

Museum <strong>of</strong> Vienna who directed <strong>the</strong><br />

fieldwork <strong>of</strong> more than 400 field workers,<br />

edited <strong>the</strong> copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 authors who<br />

wrote particular chapters (18), and syn<strong>the</strong>sized<br />

all <strong>the</strong> cartographic information.<br />

The most substantial part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atlas,<br />

pages 164-610, includes accounts <strong>of</strong> 37<br />

species (21 amphibian and 16 reptile<br />

species), from Salamandra atra (p. 164-<br />

174) to Vipera ursinii (605-610). On<br />

average, about 12 pages is devoted to<br />

each species.<br />

The result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se intensive labours is an<br />

extremely handsome <strong>book</strong>, illustrated<br />

with beautiful colour photographs (157!)<br />

<strong>of</strong> each species and <strong>the</strong>ir habitats, numerous<br />

graphs and tables, and, <strong>of</strong> course,<br />

innumerable maps that include not only<br />

details <strong>of</strong> species distribution in Austria,<br />

but also topography. For each species<br />

extensive ecological and phenological<br />

data is shown in various graphs.<br />

Moreover, vertical distribution and sympatric<br />

species are also given.<br />

An unusual, but very useful, feature is<br />

that this Atlas contains some special<br />

chapters, such as an identification key for<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> reptiles and amphibians, even<br />

for eggs and larvae <strong>of</strong> amphibians with,<br />

again, excellent black and white drawings<br />

<strong>of</strong> amphibian larvae. At <strong>the</strong> end a special<br />

Biota '31-2, 197<br />

chapter is devoted to strategies for protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> both groups. There are also<br />

some very interesting chapters about fossils<br />

and archaeological finds, and probably<br />

<strong>the</strong> most complete list <strong>of</strong> references<br />

ever seen in 39 pages!<br />

The Atlas is a valuable source <strong>of</strong> information<br />

for all those who are interested in<br />

amphibians and reptiles. It is not an ordinary<br />

atlas; it is much more! With much<br />

ecological data presented in various<br />

ways, it is also extremely useful as an<br />

ecological hand<strong>book</strong>. All European herpetologists<br />

should read this <strong>book</strong>, since it<br />

includes so much information and so<br />

many ideas.<br />

I must point out that <strong>the</strong> Atlas is a real<br />

craftsman's tool. I regret, however, that<br />

at least a few brief English summaries<br />

were not included.<br />

Milan Vogrin


198 Biota 3/i-a,<br />

EDITOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

I would like to make <strong>full</strong> acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> generosity to <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong><br />

Editorial Board and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> referees in both <strong>the</strong>ir time and expertise. I should like to thank<br />

all those who have sent in colour slides for possible reproduction on <strong>the</strong> covers.<br />

List <strong>of</strong> referee (alphabetical order) for volume 1, 2 and 3<br />

1. Maurizio Biondi (Coppito, Italy)<br />

2. Luigi Boitani (Rome, Italy)<br />

3. Massimo Capula (Rome, Italy)<br />

4. Dan Cogalniceanu (Bucharest, Romania)<br />

5. Jelka Crnobrnja-lsailovic (Belgrade, FR Yugoslavia)<br />

6. Helmut Faber (Graz, Austria)<br />

7. Simone Fattorini (Rome, Italy)<br />

8. Paolo Galeotti (Pavia, Italy)<br />

9. Justin Gerlach (Cambridge, United Kingdom)<br />

10. Giinter Gollmann (Wien, Austria)<br />

11. Richard Griffiths (Kent, United Kingdom)<br />

12. Kurt Grossenbacher (Bern, Switzerland)<br />

13. Ulrich Joger (Darmstadt, Germany)<br />

14. Janusz Kloskowski (Lublin, Poland)<br />

15. Zoltan Korsos (Budapest, Hungary)<br />

16. Luca Luiselli (Rome, Italy)<br />

17. Jean Christophe de Massary (Paris, France)<br />

18. Valentin Perez- Mellado (Salamanca, Spain)<br />

19. Juha Merila (Helsinki, Finland)<br />

20. Claude Miaud (Le Bourget du Lac, France)<br />

21. David Mifsud (Basel, Switzerland)<br />

22. Deanna H. Olson (Corvallis, Oregon, USA)<br />

23. Zbynek Rocek (Prague, Czech Republic)<br />

24. Luca Salvati (Rome, Italy)<br />

25. Sabastian Salvido (Genova, Italy)<br />

26. Josef Schmidler (Miinchen, Germany)<br />

27. Andrej Sorgo (Race, Slovenia)<br />

28. Piotr Tryjanowski (Poznan, Poland)<br />

29. Reuven Yosef (Eilat, Israel)<br />

30. Marco Zuffi (Pisa, Italy)<br />

Milan Vogrin


INSTRUCTIONS<br />

TO CONTRIBUTORS<br />

Biota publishes papers from all fields <strong>of</strong><br />

biology and ecology in <strong>the</strong>ir widest<br />

sense.<br />

It is open for authors from all countries.<br />

The language <strong>of</strong> papers is English or<br />

Slovene (with English summary).<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> papers<br />

The journal publishes original scientific<br />

papers, short communications, review<br />

articles, <strong>book</strong> reviews, special issues containing<br />

selected and edited papers dealing<br />

with a specific <strong>the</strong>me or based on a<br />

conference or workshop.<br />

The submission <strong>of</strong> a paper obliges <strong>the</strong><br />

author(s) not to submit <strong>the</strong> same paper<br />

elsewhere. Manuscripts are submitted to<br />

reviewers for evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir significance<br />

and soundness. Authors will generally<br />

be notified <strong>of</strong> acceptance, rejection,<br />

or need for revision within three months.<br />

The referees remain anonymous.<br />

Decisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> editor are final.<br />

The form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> manuscript<br />

The paper should consist <strong>of</strong> title, author's<br />

name and address, abstract (not exceed<br />

250 words), key words (no more than six)<br />

main text (i.e. introduction, material and<br />

methods, results, discussion) followed by<br />

acknowledgements, references, tables<br />

and figures. Authors <strong>of</strong> scientific taxa<br />

should be omitted. Manuscripts should<br />

be double-spaced on one side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

paper, with wide margins all round. The<br />

text <strong>of</strong> a manuscript should be without<br />

special style settings and footnotes.<br />

Headings should be on separate line, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir hierarchy should not exceed three.<br />

Authors are urged to have <strong>the</strong> manuscript<br />

revised by "native speaker", if necessary.<br />

Tables and figures should be numbered<br />

consecutively according to <strong>the</strong> text. Each<br />

should be on a separate sheet <strong>of</strong> paper.<br />

Biota 3/1-2,2002 199<br />

Each caption to a figure or table should<br />

start with <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> figure/table,<br />

e.g. Figure 1., Table 2. Tables and figures<br />

should be numbered in order <strong>of</strong> appearance<br />

in <strong>the</strong> text.<br />

Illustrations must be submitted cameraready<br />

for copying, usually as laser printouts.<br />

All internal structures, letters,<br />

graphic symbols must be well readable (at<br />

least 2 mm high) after size reduction.<br />

References. In <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> references, <strong>the</strong><br />

following usage should be followed:<br />

Journal: SURNAME, A.B. Year: Title. Full<br />

Journal name, Volume: pagination.<br />

Book: SURNAME, A.B. & SURNAME, C.<br />

Year: Title. Publisher, Place.<br />

Chapter: SURNAME, A., SURNAME & B.<br />

SURNAME, C. Year: Chapter title. In:<br />

Editors. Book or Proceeding title.<br />

Publisher, Place: pagination.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> text, citations should give <strong>the</strong><br />

author's name and <strong>the</strong> year <strong>of</strong> publication,<br />

e.g. Surname (1998) or (Surname<br />

1998) or Surname & Surname (1998).<br />

Where <strong>the</strong>re are three or more authors,<br />

<strong>the</strong> first authors name plus "et al" must<br />

be given, e.g. Surname et al. (1998,<br />

1999). Where two or more papers abbreviate<br />

to <strong>the</strong> same citation (i.e. two or<br />

more papers produced by <strong>the</strong> same<br />

authors in <strong>the</strong> same year), use "a", "b",<br />

"c", etc. in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir first appearance,<br />

e.g. (Surname 1998a, b).<br />

Reprints and pro<strong>of</strong><br />

Pro<strong>of</strong> will be send to <strong>the</strong> main author<br />

only once and it should be returned to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Editor without delay. Corrections<br />

should be limited to typographical errors.<br />

The editors reserve <strong>the</strong> right to correct<br />

<strong>the</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>the</strong>mselves, using <strong>the</strong> accepted<br />

version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> typescript, if <strong>the</strong><br />

author's corrections are overdue and <strong>the</strong><br />

journal would o<strong>the</strong>rwise be delayed.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>s should be checked very care<strong>full</strong>y. It<br />

is <strong>the</strong> correspondence author's responsi-


NAVODILO AVTORJEM<br />

Biota objavlja prispevke s podrocja<br />

biologije in ekologije v najsirsem pomenu<br />

besede. Prispevki so lahko v angleskem<br />

ali v slovenskem jeziku z daljsim<br />

angleskim povzetkom (enako naslovi<br />

tabel in grafov), ki ga pripravi avtor sam.<br />

Vrste prispevkov<br />

V Bioti je mogoce objavljati izvirne<br />

znanstvene clanke, kratke notice, pregledne<br />

clanke in predstavitve novih knjig.<br />

Biota sprejema tudi prispevke z razlicnih<br />

konferenc in posvetov. Z objavo se avtorji<br />

obvezejo, da ne bodo nikjer objavili<br />

enakega prispevka. Vsi prispevki bodo<br />

predlozeni v recenzijo dvema recenzentoma.<br />

Recenzenti ostanejo anonimni.<br />

Avtorji bodo obvesceni o sprejemu, zavrnitvi<br />

ali reviziji prispevka predvidoma v<br />

treh mesecih. Odlocitev urednika je<br />

dokoncna.<br />

Oblika prispevka<br />

Prispevek mora vsebovati naslov, imena<br />

avtorjev in njihove naslove, izvlecek (do<br />

250 besed), kljucne besede (do sest) ter<br />

glavni tekst (uvod, material in metode,<br />

rezultati, diskusija) ki mu sledi zahvala,<br />

literatura, tabele in grafi. Prispevek predlozite<br />

v dveh izvodih, z dvojnim medvrstnim<br />

razmakom in s sirokimi robovi.<br />

Odstavki naj bodo med seboj loceni s<br />

prazno vrstico. V kolikor je prispevek<br />

pisan v angleskem jeziku, avtorju priporocamo,<br />

da ga pregleda "native<br />

speaker".<br />

Tabele in slike (grafi, fotografije, risbe)<br />

naj bodo ostevilcene po zaporedju, kot se<br />

pojavljajo v besedilu. Vsaka tabela in graf<br />

morata biti na svojem listu. Tabela ali graf<br />

se morata priceti z zaporedno stevilko,<br />

npr. Slika 1, Tabela 2.<br />

llustracije naj bodo tiskane na laserski<br />

tiskalnik. Risbe so lahko narisane tudi s<br />

Biota 3/1-2,2002 201<br />

crnim tusem na paus papirju. Crke,<br />

stevilke in simboli morajo biti velike vsaj 2<br />

mm.<br />

Literatura<br />

Vsi uporabljeni viri morajo biti citirani<br />

med tekstom. Literaturo uredite po<br />

abecednem redu prvega avtorja in glede<br />

na letnico izdaje:<br />

Revija: PRIIMEK, A.B. Leto: Naslov. Polno<br />

ime revije, letnik: strani.<br />

Knjiga: PRIIMEK, A.B. & PRIIMEK, C.<br />

Leto: Naslov. Izdajatelj, kraj.<br />

Poglavje: PRIIMEK, A., PRIIMEK, B. &<br />

PRIIMEK, C. Leto: Naslov poglavja. V:<br />

Urednik(i). Naslov knjige ali zbornika.<br />

Izdajatelj, kraj: strani.<br />

V tekstu citiramo na naslednji nacin:<br />

Priimek (1998) ali (Priimek 1998) ali<br />

Priimek & Priimek (1998). Ce so vec kot<br />

trije avtorji pa: Priimek et al. (1998,<br />

1999). V primeru, ce citiramo vec del<br />

istega avtorja, objavljenih v enem letu,<br />

posamezno delo oznacimo s crkami a, b,<br />

c, itd., npr. (Priimek 1998a, b).<br />

Korektura in separati<br />

Prvi odtis prispevka urednik poslje<br />

glavnemu avtorju v korekturo. Avtor je<br />

dolzan vrniti popravljeno besedilo v<br />

najkrajsem moznem casu. Sirjenje obsega<br />

besedila ob korekturah ni dovoljeno.<br />

Glavni avtor prejme 30 separatov in izvod<br />

revije, kjer je bil objavljen prispevek, brezplacno.<br />

Original in dve kopiji prispevka vkljucno s<br />

tabelami, slikami in grafi posljite na<br />

naslov (v kolikor prispevek posiljate po<br />

elektronski posti, datoteko shranite kot<br />

"obogateno besedilo" - Rich Text Format<br />

(rtf.):<br />

BIOTA<br />

Milan Vogrin, Zg. Hajdina 83c,<br />

SI-2288 Hajdina, Slovenia<br />

Fax: 02 788 30 51<br />

E-mail: milan.vogrin@guest.ames.si


Klub svetnic in svetnikov LDS Zalec<br />

POKRAJINSKI PODJETNISKI FORUM<br />

Ul. Ivanke Uranjek 1, Zalec


Drustvo za proucevanje ptic<br />

in varstvo narave<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> bird research<br />

and nature protection<br />

Ptujska c. 91<br />

SI - 2327 Race<br />

Slovenia


V P<br />

Drustvo varuhov okoija Radoziv<br />

Environmental society Radoziv<br />

Ul. Ivanjke Uranjek 1<br />

SI-3310 Za/ec<br />

Slovenia


forum<br />

Danube Forum<br />

Hanulova 5/D<br />

844 40 Bratislava<br />

www.de-forum.org


TO ADVERTISE IN THIS JOURNAL<br />

SEND AN E-MAIL TO<br />

milan.vogrin@guest.arnes.si

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!