05.01.2015 Views

Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa

Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa

Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>07</strong>0222 v.1.0<br />

envisioned that our proposal will rely on self assessment and compliance measurement on an<br />

account basis. We have been tasked to present benefits to CBP in favor of our proposal. The<br />

<strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> would like to <strong>for</strong>malize this ef<strong>for</strong>t and achieve an agreement in principle at<br />

this meeting with CBP.<br />

11:30 – CCS & <strong>Customs</strong> Outreach<br />

In the spring of 2005 NCBFAA inaugurated its <strong>Customs</strong> Compliance Specialist program.<br />

The stated purpose of this program is to enhance the expertise and professionalism of our trade<br />

sector. At the heart of the program is a requirement <strong>for</strong> continuing education <strong>for</strong> annual<br />

recertification. A point system has been devised to objectify the accumulation of educational<br />

experiences throughout the year. In order to provide an enrollment that is nationwide the<br />

greatest opportunity <strong>for</strong> meaningful educational experiences, NCBFAA will recognize third<br />

party tuition with an appropriate point award. We believe that our CCS participants should be<br />

encouraged to attend CBP outreach opportunities, and deserve to earn continuing education<br />

points <strong>for</strong> those events. CBP cooperation is necessary to accomplish this. The <strong>Customs</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> hopes to persuade CBP at this meeting of the merits <strong>for</strong> supporting our CCS program<br />

in this way.<br />

12:00 – Lunch<br />

13:00 – Late Pay Penalty Guidelines<br />

The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> Chairman filed in<strong>for</strong>mal comments with Jeremy Baskin on<br />

November 16, 2005 as follows: “As to the PMS penalty and mitigation guideline, NCBFAA<br />

would like to suggest –<br />

1. A $2,500 cap on the base amount + interest calculated at the official posted rates, and<br />

2. Clear language that an Option 1 penalty might be remitted in full, or substantially mitigated<br />

if it can be shown that the late pay resulted solely due to a customs broker automated<br />

systems “glitch” or similar (snow day type) failure.<br />

Clearly $2,500 is not an insignificant amount <strong>for</strong> even a large customs broker. It may represent<br />

the fees collected <strong>for</strong> as many as 100 entries (or more) at the border. When en<strong>for</strong>ced against a<br />

small customs broker, that amount will come right out of the owner’s pocket. I don’t know how<br />

that would feel <strong>for</strong> the CBP officials establishing this guideline, but it certainly would cause me<br />

very significant distress if it came out of my checking account. The majority of NCBFAA<br />

members are small businesses; $2,500 + interest is very meaningful. If your constituency<br />

disagrees, we would be interested to see some statistics to support the need <strong>for</strong> a larger penalty.<br />

As I said during our meeting, and as I’ve expressed to the NCBFAA <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong>, we<br />

know that the penalty must sting, but we would like to negotiate the lowest reasonable threshold<br />

<strong>for</strong> this.<br />

If you set the base amount of the penalty too high, you will simply exclude a large number<br />

of mostly small customs brokers from using broker periodic statements. CBP might still reach<br />

its goal <strong>for</strong> PMS duty collections, but as a byproduct CBP will be introducing an artificial<br />

anticompetitive obstacle into the customs brokerage market. Please believe me that there are<br />

already significant competitive advantages enjoyed by the large firms in this market space. If the<br />

base amount proves to be too low, CBP can always come back with an FRN and adjust the<br />

amount upward, as it has done <strong>for</strong> bond amounts.”<br />

Page 3 of 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!