05.01.2015 Views

Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa

Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa

Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>07</strong>0222 v.1.0<br />

The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> would appreciate the opportunity to reach an understanding with<br />

CBP on this important issue.<br />

13:50 – ACE eManifest<br />

As eManifest becomes mandatory we continue to experience problems related to systems,<br />

training, and acceptance. We can appreciate the investment CBP has made and continues to<br />

make to provide <strong>for</strong> a smooth transition, and we recognize that our community needs to be part<br />

of the solution and not part of the problem. The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> believes that in at least<br />

some cases CBP has been reluctant to seek practical solutions to acknowledged issues, allowing<br />

unwarranted penalties to result, the burden <strong>for</strong> resolution to fall unduly on our members, and our<br />

cost of doing business to unnecessarily escalate. If NCBFAA and its members can be of any<br />

practical assistance to make <strong>for</strong> a better transition as ACE eManifest advances, this <strong>Committee</strong><br />

would like to know the specific means by which that might be done. The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong><br />

believes that it brings to this meeting important insight into ways by which CBP might improve<br />

this experience. For this discussion we think that the participation of Jim Swanson and/or Lou<br />

Samenfink would be beneficial.<br />

14:40 – Break<br />

15:00 – Recordkeeping Amendments<br />

The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong>’s request <strong>for</strong> revision of the recordkeeping regulations (see<br />

Attachment “B”) would bring those requirements into con<strong>for</strong>mity with current business practice<br />

without compromising CBP’s legitimate interests to have records available <strong>for</strong> inspection and<br />

review at the port of entry within a reasonable period of time after making a demand <strong>for</strong><br />

production of those records. This very important consideration <strong>for</strong> our <strong>Committee</strong> and the entire<br />

customs brokerage industry has languished at headquarters <strong>for</strong> the last four years. On several<br />

occasions we were told by Betsy Durant that our request had been well received, that proposed<br />

rulemaking could be anticipated, and that we would be well pleased with the revisions. In the<br />

<strong>Committee</strong> Chairman’s last meeting with Larry Rosenzweig, as Acting Director <strong>for</strong> the Office of<br />

Trade Relations, he said that he agreed with our request. To this date CBP has offered no<br />

substantive reason <strong>for</strong> the delay in coming <strong>for</strong>ward with proposed rulemaking based upon our<br />

draft revisions.<br />

For years CBP has publicized its progress toward business oriented and account based<br />

paradigms in rebuilding the agency to better accomplish its missions. Our community has<br />

worked mightily, as volunteers, alongside CBP in the TSN, COAC and other trade support<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts to help CBP realize its business goals. It is extremely disheartening when we make such<br />

a modest proposal that would greatly facilitate our own business practice without diminishing in<br />

any way CBP’s legitimate interests, and requiring only minimal ef<strong>for</strong>t on the part of CBP to<br />

accomplish, to have nothing to show <strong>for</strong> it after four years. The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> would<br />

appreciate the opportunity to discuss this item with the Assistant Commissioner and the<br />

responsible OR&R attorney.<br />

15:30 – Emergency Temporary Permit Regulation<br />

In view of the recent creation of the Office of Trade, the imperative <strong>for</strong> post incident<br />

resumption of trade readiness established in P.L. 109–347 dated October 13, 2006 (The SAFE<br />

Ports Act of 2006), Section 202, and in consideration of the key role played by customs brokers<br />

Page 4 of 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!