Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa
Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa
Customs Committee Agenda for 4/5/07 Meeting - ncbfaa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>07</strong>0222 v.1.0<br />
The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> would appreciate the opportunity to reach an understanding with<br />
CBP on this important issue.<br />
13:50 – ACE eManifest<br />
As eManifest becomes mandatory we continue to experience problems related to systems,<br />
training, and acceptance. We can appreciate the investment CBP has made and continues to<br />
make to provide <strong>for</strong> a smooth transition, and we recognize that our community needs to be part<br />
of the solution and not part of the problem. The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> believes that in at least<br />
some cases CBP has been reluctant to seek practical solutions to acknowledged issues, allowing<br />
unwarranted penalties to result, the burden <strong>for</strong> resolution to fall unduly on our members, and our<br />
cost of doing business to unnecessarily escalate. If NCBFAA and its members can be of any<br />
practical assistance to make <strong>for</strong> a better transition as ACE eManifest advances, this <strong>Committee</strong><br />
would like to know the specific means by which that might be done. The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong><br />
believes that it brings to this meeting important insight into ways by which CBP might improve<br />
this experience. For this discussion we think that the participation of Jim Swanson and/or Lou<br />
Samenfink would be beneficial.<br />
14:40 – Break<br />
15:00 – Recordkeeping Amendments<br />
The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong>’s request <strong>for</strong> revision of the recordkeeping regulations (see<br />
Attachment “B”) would bring those requirements into con<strong>for</strong>mity with current business practice<br />
without compromising CBP’s legitimate interests to have records available <strong>for</strong> inspection and<br />
review at the port of entry within a reasonable period of time after making a demand <strong>for</strong><br />
production of those records. This very important consideration <strong>for</strong> our <strong>Committee</strong> and the entire<br />
customs brokerage industry has languished at headquarters <strong>for</strong> the last four years. On several<br />
occasions we were told by Betsy Durant that our request had been well received, that proposed<br />
rulemaking could be anticipated, and that we would be well pleased with the revisions. In the<br />
<strong>Committee</strong> Chairman’s last meeting with Larry Rosenzweig, as Acting Director <strong>for</strong> the Office of<br />
Trade Relations, he said that he agreed with our request. To this date CBP has offered no<br />
substantive reason <strong>for</strong> the delay in coming <strong>for</strong>ward with proposed rulemaking based upon our<br />
draft revisions.<br />
For years CBP has publicized its progress toward business oriented and account based<br />
paradigms in rebuilding the agency to better accomplish its missions. Our community has<br />
worked mightily, as volunteers, alongside CBP in the TSN, COAC and other trade support<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>ts to help CBP realize its business goals. It is extremely disheartening when we make such<br />
a modest proposal that would greatly facilitate our own business practice without diminishing in<br />
any way CBP’s legitimate interests, and requiring only minimal ef<strong>for</strong>t on the part of CBP to<br />
accomplish, to have nothing to show <strong>for</strong> it after four years. The <strong>Customs</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> would<br />
appreciate the opportunity to discuss this item with the Assistant Commissioner and the<br />
responsible OR&R attorney.<br />
15:30 – Emergency Temporary Permit Regulation<br />
In view of the recent creation of the Office of Trade, the imperative <strong>for</strong> post incident<br />
resumption of trade readiness established in P.L. 109–347 dated October 13, 2006 (The SAFE<br />
Ports Act of 2006), Section 202, and in consideration of the key role played by customs brokers<br />
Page 4 of 17