Plaintiffs' Reply To Defendant's Opposition To Motion To Compel ...
Plaintiffs' Reply To Defendant's Opposition To Motion To Compel ...
Plaintiffs' Reply To Defendant's Opposition To Motion To Compel ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
Plaintiffs further request an award of sanctions, as set forth in the <strong>Motion</strong>, as defendant City of<br />
Oxnard was not substantially justified in opposing this <strong>Motion</strong>.<br />
DATED: May 7, 2007<br />
HIEPLER & HIEPLER<br />
A Professional Partnership<br />
By: __________________________<br />
MARK O. HIEPLER<br />
TERRY L. TRON<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
______________________________________________________________________________<br />
8<br />
Plaintiffs’ <strong>Reply</strong> <strong>To</strong> Defendant’s <strong>Opposition</strong> <strong>To</strong> <strong>Motion</strong> <strong>To</strong> <strong>Compel</strong> Depositions Of<br />
Officer Frank Brisslinger And Officer Martin Polo
Change language