Dr. Sarwar J Zuberi.pdf - Institute of Basic Medical Sciences
Dr. Sarwar J Zuberi.pdf - Institute of Basic Medical Sciences
Dr. Sarwar J Zuberi.pdf - Institute of Basic Medical Sciences
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Medical</strong> Writing<br />
<strong>Dr</strong>. <strong>Sarwar</strong> J <strong>Zuberi</strong><br />
Ziauddin <strong>Medical</strong> University<br />
&<br />
Pakistan <strong>Medical</strong> & Research Council
Types <strong>of</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> Writing<br />
Editorial<br />
Original Article<br />
Review Articles<br />
Short Papers<br />
Case Reports<br />
Letter to Editor<br />
Personal Views<br />
Special Communication
The <strong>Basic</strong> Structure <strong>of</strong> Article<br />
TITLE<br />
(S)Summary (Structured Abstract)<br />
(I) Introduction (What Question was asked)<br />
(M)Methods (How was it Studied)<br />
(R)Results (What was Found)<br />
(A)Analysis (How data was analysed)<br />
(D)Discussion (What Do the Findings Mean)<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
References
Title<br />
Should be specific But comprehensive<br />
Short But sufficiently descriptive<br />
No abbreviations<br />
Should be easy To catalogue
Structured abstract<br />
• Objective<br />
• Design<br />
• Setting<br />
• Patients and methods<br />
• Results<br />
• Conclusions<br />
• Key words
Introduction<br />
Existing state <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
Gaps in knowledge which research will fill.<br />
State what you Intend to do<br />
Give pertinent references<br />
It does not<br />
Review the history <strong>of</strong> the subject<br />
Does not identify all the other gaps in knowledge<br />
Don not include methods, results and discussion
Methods<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
What Subjects/patients/animals/specimens<br />
techniques were used<br />
Reason for selecting the experimental design<br />
<strong>of</strong> the study<br />
Statistical methods used for analysis<br />
The section should be called "Materiel and<br />
Methods" only if inanimate specimens have<br />
been used.<br />
(continue)
Methods<br />
Patient / Animals / Specimens<br />
• Numbers<br />
• How are they grouped<br />
• (cases /controls)<br />
• Criteria<br />
• Informed consent obtained
Techniques<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Give enough details for readers to assess the<br />
validity <strong>of</strong> the results, and repeat the study<br />
If standard techniques is used, give appropriate<br />
reference,any modifications should be clearly<br />
explained<br />
If drug trial- clear description <strong>of</strong> trial
Statistics<br />
Clearly mention the statistical<br />
methods used for appropriate<br />
verification <strong>of</strong> reported results.<br />
(consult a statistician before starting<br />
the study)
Results<br />
<br />
Communication <strong>of</strong> facts, measurements,<br />
and observations gathered by the author<br />
<br />
Start with the results that are easier to<br />
interpret<br />
<br />
Results should be set out in tables and<br />
figures<br />
<br />
Do not duplicate illustrations
Discussion<br />
<br />
What gaps in knowledge remain to be filled<br />
<br />
Main results should be summarised at the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> discussion<br />
<br />
Only mention previous results or comments which<br />
illuminate or which are illuminated by the present<br />
results.<br />
(continue)
Discussion<br />
• Final paragraph in which the message <strong>of</strong> the article is<br />
firmly stated.<br />
• Point out where further gaps in knowledge could usefully<br />
be filled instead <strong>of</strong> "further research is needed".<br />
• Intention <strong>of</strong> author to explore the "Gaps" further.
Acknowledgements (Silent partners)<br />
“We wish to thank” - all those who deserve<br />
recognition for their contribution but who have<br />
not made a significant intellectual contribution<br />
and are therefore not included as authors<br />
(Colleagues,Institutions, Organizations providing<br />
financial help, laboratory and secretarial staff)
References<br />
1.Standard journal article<br />
Vega K., Pina I., Krevisky B. Heart transplantation<br />
is associated with an increased risk for<br />
pancreaticobiliary disease. Ann Intern Med 1996<br />
Jun 1: 124(11): 980-3<br />
2.Books and other monographs<br />
Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP. Hypertension and stroke.<br />
In: Laragh JH, Bremier BM, editors. Hypertension:<br />
pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 2nd<br />
ed. New York: Raven Press; 1995. P.465-78.
References<br />
3.Disertation<br />
Kaplan SJ. Post-hospital home health care: the<br />
elderly's access and untilizaiion (dissertation]. St.<br />
Louis (MO): Washington Univ: 1995.<br />
4. Unpublished material<br />
Leshner AL. Molecular mechanisms <strong>of</strong> cocaine. N<br />
Engl J Med. In press 1996.<br />
5. Electronic material<br />
Morse SS. Factors in the emergence <strong>of</strong> infectious<br />
disease. Emerg Inftect Dis [serial online] 1995 Jan-<br />
Mar (cited 1996 Jun 5]; 1(1): [24 screens].<br />
Available from URL:<br />
http:/www.cdc.gov/ncdod/EID/eid.htm
Summing Up<br />
In the words <strong>of</strong> Stephen Lock,<br />
“ A good article has a definite structure. Make<br />
its point and then shuts up”
Sending Manuscript to the Journal<br />
Required number <strong>of</strong> copies in a heavy envelop<br />
enclosing figures / photos / photo<br />
micrographics in card boards in separate<br />
envelop<br />
Covering letter signed by all co-authors<br />
Has not been submitted else where<br />
Approved by all authors<br />
Authors will bear the cost <strong>of</strong> colour illustration
Requirements for Submission <strong>of</strong><br />
Manuscript<br />
Must Read Instructions to Authors<br />
(Uniform requirements for manuscripts<br />
submitted to biomedical Journals 1997)<br />
Preparation<br />
Abstract<br />
• Introduction<br />
• Methods<br />
• Materials<br />
• Subjects<br />
• Patients<br />
• Results<br />
• Discussion<br />
Typing<br />
• White bond paper<br />
(8.1/2 x 11” or A4 with 1”<br />
margins<br />
Typing - Double space<br />
• Number pages<br />
consecutively beginning<br />
with title page (upper or<br />
lower right hand corner)
Requirements for Submission <strong>of</strong><br />
Manuscript<br />
Manuscript on DISC<br />
Include a printout version<br />
Name the file clearly<br />
Label the disc with format <strong>of</strong> the file<br />
and file name<br />
Provide information on hardware and<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware used.
Title Page (1st Page)<br />
Title <strong>of</strong> the article (concise information)<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> author(s)<br />
Highest academic degree(s)<br />
Affiliation<br />
Department<br />
Institution<br />
Disclaimers if any<br />
Name and address <strong>of</strong> author for correspondence<br />
about the manuscript<br />
Source <strong>of</strong> support in the form <strong>of</strong> grants,<br />
equipment, drugs<br />
Short running head or foot line <strong>of</strong> no more than<br />
40 characters
Abstract and Key Words (2 nd Page)<br />
150 words for unstructured abstract<br />
250 words for structured abstract<br />
Abstract should be<br />
Purpose <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
<strong>Basic</strong> procedures (selection <strong>of</strong> subjects,<br />
observational and analytical methods)<br />
Main findings (Data and its significance)<br />
The principal conclusions<br />
3-10 Key words<br />
Assist indexer and cross indexing<br />
Terms from medical subject heading (MeSH)<br />
should be used
Introduction (3rd Page)<br />
State purpose <strong>of</strong> the article<br />
Summarize the rationale for study or observation<br />
Give Strictly pertinent reference<br />
Do not include data or conclusion
Method (4 th Page)<br />
Describe selection <strong>of</strong> the observational,<br />
Experimental subjects including controls<br />
Experimental method (reference for standard<br />
methods)<br />
Statistical methods<br />
Ethics
Results (5 th Page)<br />
Logical sequence<br />
Text<br />
Tables<br />
Illustrations<br />
Do not repeat in the text all the data in tables /<br />
figures emphasize, summarizing important<br />
observations<br />
Tables<br />
Figures<br />
- Number tables separate sheets<br />
- Legends<br />
5 x 7” or 8 x10” glossy prints<br />
(Black & white / coloured)
Discussion (6 th Page)<br />
Emphasize new and important aspects <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
and conclusions that follow<br />
Do not repeat the data<br />
Include implications <strong>of</strong> the funding, their<br />
limitations and implications for future Research<br />
Relate observations with other relevant studies<br />
Recommendations when appropriate may be<br />
included
Acknowledgement (7 th Page)<br />
Those who do not justify to be Authors should be<br />
Acknowledged<br />
Those who have provided technical help<br />
Financial and material support
Some Guidelines<br />
Choose an appropriate Journals<br />
Go through the “uniform requirements for<br />
Biomedical publications”<br />
Write simple grammatically correct sentences<br />
Brevity is the best practice<br />
Avoid irrelevant details<br />
Show the draft to colleagues<br />
Read final draft carefully<br />
Typographical and grammatical mistakes give bad<br />
impression<br />
Check tables and figures (Captions, size, clarity)
Authorship<br />
All person designated as authors should qualify for<br />
authorship<br />
Author should have participated sufficiently in the<br />
work to take public responsibility for the content<br />
Authorship credit should be based on substantial<br />
contribution to:<br />
Conception<br />
Design<br />
Analysis & interpretation <strong>of</strong> data
Authorship<br />
<strong>Dr</strong>afting, revising it critically, for important<br />
intellectual contents and final approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />
contents<br />
Participating solely in acquisition <strong>of</strong> funding,<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> data does not justify authorship<br />
General supervision <strong>of</strong> research group is not<br />
sufficient for authorship<br />
Order <strong>of</strong> the author should be a joint decision <strong>of</strong><br />
the authors