07.01.2015 Views

Dr. Sarwar J Zuberi.pdf - Institute of Basic Medical Sciences

Dr. Sarwar J Zuberi.pdf - Institute of Basic Medical Sciences

Dr. Sarwar J Zuberi.pdf - Institute of Basic Medical Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Medical</strong> Writing<br />

<strong>Dr</strong>. <strong>Sarwar</strong> J <strong>Zuberi</strong><br />

Ziauddin <strong>Medical</strong> University<br />

&<br />

Pakistan <strong>Medical</strong> & Research Council


Types <strong>of</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> Writing<br />

Editorial<br />

Original Article<br />

Review Articles<br />

Short Papers<br />

Case Reports<br />

Letter to Editor<br />

Personal Views<br />

Special Communication


The <strong>Basic</strong> Structure <strong>of</strong> Article<br />

TITLE<br />

(S)Summary (Structured Abstract)<br />

(I) Introduction (What Question was asked)<br />

(M)Methods (How was it Studied)<br />

(R)Results (What was Found)<br />

(A)Analysis (How data was analysed)<br />

(D)Discussion (What Do the Findings Mean)<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

References


Title<br />

Should be specific But comprehensive<br />

Short But sufficiently descriptive<br />

No abbreviations<br />

Should be easy To catalogue


Structured abstract<br />

• Objective<br />

• Design<br />

• Setting<br />

• Patients and methods<br />

• Results<br />

• Conclusions<br />

• Key words


Introduction<br />

Existing state <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

Gaps in knowledge which research will fill.<br />

State what you Intend to do<br />

Give pertinent references<br />

It does not<br />

Review the history <strong>of</strong> the subject<br />

Does not identify all the other gaps in knowledge<br />

Don not include methods, results and discussion


Methods<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

What Subjects/patients/animals/specimens<br />

techniques were used<br />

Reason for selecting the experimental design<br />

<strong>of</strong> the study<br />

Statistical methods used for analysis<br />

The section should be called "Materiel and<br />

Methods" only if inanimate specimens have<br />

been used.<br />

(continue)


Methods<br />

Patient / Animals / Specimens<br />

• Numbers<br />

• How are they grouped<br />

• (cases /controls)<br />

• Criteria<br />

• Informed consent obtained


Techniques<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Give enough details for readers to assess the<br />

validity <strong>of</strong> the results, and repeat the study<br />

If standard techniques is used, give appropriate<br />

reference,any modifications should be clearly<br />

explained<br />

If drug trial- clear description <strong>of</strong> trial


Statistics<br />

Clearly mention the statistical<br />

methods used for appropriate<br />

verification <strong>of</strong> reported results.<br />

(consult a statistician before starting<br />

the study)


Results<br />

<br />

Communication <strong>of</strong> facts, measurements,<br />

and observations gathered by the author<br />

<br />

Start with the results that are easier to<br />

interpret<br />

<br />

Results should be set out in tables and<br />

figures<br />

<br />

Do not duplicate illustrations


Discussion<br />

<br />

What gaps in knowledge remain to be filled<br />

<br />

Main results should be summarised at the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> discussion<br />

<br />

Only mention previous results or comments which<br />

illuminate or which are illuminated by the present<br />

results.<br />

(continue)


Discussion<br />

• Final paragraph in which the message <strong>of</strong> the article is<br />

firmly stated.<br />

• Point out where further gaps in knowledge could usefully<br />

be filled instead <strong>of</strong> "further research is needed".<br />

• Intention <strong>of</strong> author to explore the "Gaps" further.


Acknowledgements (Silent partners)<br />

“We wish to thank” - all those who deserve<br />

recognition for their contribution but who have<br />

not made a significant intellectual contribution<br />

and are therefore not included as authors<br />

(Colleagues,Institutions, Organizations providing<br />

financial help, laboratory and secretarial staff)


References<br />

1.Standard journal article<br />

Vega K., Pina I., Krevisky B. Heart transplantation<br />

is associated with an increased risk for<br />

pancreaticobiliary disease. Ann Intern Med 1996<br />

Jun 1: 124(11): 980-3<br />

2.Books and other monographs<br />

Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP. Hypertension and stroke.<br />

In: Laragh JH, Bremier BM, editors. Hypertension:<br />

pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 2nd<br />

ed. New York: Raven Press; 1995. P.465-78.


References<br />

3.Disertation<br />

Kaplan SJ. Post-hospital home health care: the<br />

elderly's access and untilizaiion (dissertation]. St.<br />

Louis (MO): Washington Univ: 1995.<br />

4. Unpublished material<br />

Leshner AL. Molecular mechanisms <strong>of</strong> cocaine. N<br />

Engl J Med. In press 1996.<br />

5. Electronic material<br />

Morse SS. Factors in the emergence <strong>of</strong> infectious<br />

disease. Emerg Inftect Dis [serial online] 1995 Jan-<br />

Mar (cited 1996 Jun 5]; 1(1): [24 screens].<br />

Available from URL:<br />

http:/www.cdc.gov/ncdod/EID/eid.htm


Summing Up<br />

In the words <strong>of</strong> Stephen Lock,<br />

“ A good article has a definite structure. Make<br />

its point and then shuts up”


Sending Manuscript to the Journal<br />

Required number <strong>of</strong> copies in a heavy envelop<br />

enclosing figures / photos / photo<br />

micrographics in card boards in separate<br />

envelop<br />

Covering letter signed by all co-authors<br />

Has not been submitted else where<br />

Approved by all authors<br />

Authors will bear the cost <strong>of</strong> colour illustration


Requirements for Submission <strong>of</strong><br />

Manuscript<br />

Must Read Instructions to Authors<br />

(Uniform requirements for manuscripts<br />

submitted to biomedical Journals 1997)<br />

Preparation<br />

Abstract<br />

• Introduction<br />

• Methods<br />

• Materials<br />

• Subjects<br />

• Patients<br />

• Results<br />

• Discussion<br />

Typing<br />

• White bond paper<br />

(8.1/2 x 11” or A4 with 1”<br />

margins<br />

Typing - Double space<br />

• Number pages<br />

consecutively beginning<br />

with title page (upper or<br />

lower right hand corner)


Requirements for Submission <strong>of</strong><br />

Manuscript<br />

Manuscript on DISC<br />

Include a printout version<br />

Name the file clearly<br />

Label the disc with format <strong>of</strong> the file<br />

and file name<br />

Provide information on hardware and<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware used.


Title Page (1st Page)<br />

Title <strong>of</strong> the article (concise information)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> author(s)<br />

Highest academic degree(s)<br />

Affiliation<br />

Department<br />

Institution<br />

Disclaimers if any<br />

Name and address <strong>of</strong> author for correspondence<br />

about the manuscript<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> support in the form <strong>of</strong> grants,<br />

equipment, drugs<br />

Short running head or foot line <strong>of</strong> no more than<br />

40 characters


Abstract and Key Words (2 nd Page)<br />

150 words for unstructured abstract<br />

250 words for structured abstract<br />

Abstract should be<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

<strong>Basic</strong> procedures (selection <strong>of</strong> subjects,<br />

observational and analytical methods)<br />

Main findings (Data and its significance)<br />

The principal conclusions<br />

3-10 Key words<br />

Assist indexer and cross indexing<br />

Terms from medical subject heading (MeSH)<br />

should be used


Introduction (3rd Page)<br />

State purpose <strong>of</strong> the article<br />

Summarize the rationale for study or observation<br />

Give Strictly pertinent reference<br />

Do not include data or conclusion


Method (4 th Page)<br />

Describe selection <strong>of</strong> the observational,<br />

Experimental subjects including controls<br />

Experimental method (reference for standard<br />

methods)<br />

Statistical methods<br />

Ethics


Results (5 th Page)<br />

Logical sequence<br />

Text<br />

Tables<br />

Illustrations<br />

Do not repeat in the text all the data in tables /<br />

figures emphasize, summarizing important<br />

observations<br />

Tables<br />

Figures<br />

- Number tables separate sheets<br />

- Legends<br />

5 x 7” or 8 x10” glossy prints<br />

(Black & white / coloured)


Discussion (6 th Page)<br />

Emphasize new and important aspects <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

and conclusions that follow<br />

Do not repeat the data<br />

Include implications <strong>of</strong> the funding, their<br />

limitations and implications for future Research<br />

Relate observations with other relevant studies<br />

Recommendations when appropriate may be<br />

included


Acknowledgement (7 th Page)<br />

Those who do not justify to be Authors should be<br />

Acknowledged<br />

Those who have provided technical help<br />

Financial and material support


Some Guidelines<br />

Choose an appropriate Journals<br />

Go through the “uniform requirements for<br />

Biomedical publications”<br />

Write simple grammatically correct sentences<br />

Brevity is the best practice<br />

Avoid irrelevant details<br />

Show the draft to colleagues<br />

Read final draft carefully<br />

Typographical and grammatical mistakes give bad<br />

impression<br />

Check tables and figures (Captions, size, clarity)


Authorship<br />

All person designated as authors should qualify for<br />

authorship<br />

Author should have participated sufficiently in the<br />

work to take public responsibility for the content<br />

Authorship credit should be based on substantial<br />

contribution to:<br />

Conception<br />

Design<br />

Analysis & interpretation <strong>of</strong> data


Authorship<br />

<strong>Dr</strong>afting, revising it critically, for important<br />

intellectual contents and final approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

contents<br />

Participating solely in acquisition <strong>of</strong> funding,<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> data does not justify authorship<br />

General supervision <strong>of</strong> research group is not<br />

sufficient for authorship<br />

Order <strong>of</strong> the author should be a joint decision <strong>of</strong><br />

the authors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!