Adding an On/Off Device to Activate RFID Tags in Enhanced Driver's ...
Adding an On/Off Device to Activate RFID Tags in Enhanced Driver's ...
Adding an On/Off Device to Activate RFID Tags in Enhanced Driver's ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Add<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>On</strong>/<strong>Off</strong> <strong>Device</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Activate</strong> <strong>RFID</strong> <strong>Tags</strong> <strong>in</strong> Enh<strong>an</strong>ced Driver’s Licences<br />
<strong>Add<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>On</strong>/<strong>Off</strong> <strong>Device</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Activate</strong><br />
<strong>RFID</strong> <strong>Tags</strong> <strong>in</strong> Enh<strong>an</strong>ced Driver’s Licences:<br />
Pioneer<strong>in</strong>g a Made-<strong>in</strong>-<strong>On</strong>tario<br />
Tr<strong>an</strong>sformative Technology That<br />
Delivers Both Privacy <strong>an</strong>d Security<br />
There are well-known privacy <strong>an</strong>d security vulnerabilities associated with Radio<br />
Frequency Identification (<strong>RFID</strong>) technology. So when I learned that the <strong>in</strong>clusion of<br />
<strong>an</strong> <strong>RFID</strong> would be a non-negotiable feature of <strong>On</strong>tario’s Enh<strong>an</strong>ced Driver’s Licence<br />
(EDL), my first thought was, “How c<strong>an</strong> we tr<strong>an</strong>sform the <strong>RFID</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> a technology<br />
that performs its functionality <strong>an</strong>d is protective of privacy” The <strong>RFID</strong> technology<br />
chosen by the U.S. Government for the EDL will respond not only <strong>to</strong> the authorized<br />
readers at the C<strong>an</strong>ada-U.S. border, but also <strong>to</strong> <strong>an</strong>y number of commercially<br />
available <strong>RFID</strong> readers which may be used surreptitiously. Therefore, it is imperative<br />
that holders of <strong>an</strong> EDL be able <strong>to</strong> prevent the <strong>RFID</strong> from be<strong>in</strong>g read by unauthorized<br />
third parties <strong>an</strong>d disengage the <strong>RFID</strong> when not required for<br />
border-cross<strong>in</strong>g purposes.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the ’90s, I have been promot<strong>in</strong>g the concept of “Privacy by Design,” a term<br />
I developed <strong>to</strong> capture the idea of embedd<strong>in</strong>g privacy <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the design specifications<br />
of technology – mak<strong>in</strong>g privacy the default. 1 I have never believed that the relationship<br />
between privacy <strong>an</strong>d security had <strong>to</strong> be characterized as a zero-sum<br />
game, me<strong>an</strong><strong>in</strong>g that the more you have of one <strong>in</strong>terest (security), the less you c<strong>an</strong><br />
have of <strong>an</strong>other (privacy). I favour a positive-sum paradigm where<strong>in</strong> add<strong>in</strong>g privacy<br />
measures <strong>to</strong> otherwise privacy-<strong>in</strong>vasive systems need not weaken security or<br />
functionality, but rather may, <strong>in</strong> fact, enh<strong>an</strong>ce the overall level of protection. I<br />
strongly believe that, by extension, my concept of Privacy by Design c<strong>an</strong> be applied<br />
<strong>to</strong> the use of <strong>RFID</strong> technology <strong>in</strong> the EDL.<br />
In my Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2008 submission <strong>an</strong>d testimony <strong>to</strong> the <strong>On</strong>tario Legislature’s<br />
St<strong>an</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Committee on General Government on Bill 85, I recommended that, “The<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry must work with a selected vendor <strong>to</strong> pursue add<strong>in</strong>g a privacy-enh<strong>an</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on/off device for the <strong>RFID</strong> tag embedded <strong>in</strong> the card” (Recommendation 4). This<br />
is the privacy-enh<strong>an</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g solution I am promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> safeguard the use of <strong>RFID</strong><br />
technology <strong>in</strong> <strong>On</strong>tario’s EDL.<br />
1 For more <strong>in</strong>formation about the orig<strong>in</strong>s of Privacy by Design, please see my paper “Privacy by<br />
Design,” available onl<strong>in</strong>e at http://www.ipc.on.ca/images/Resources/privacybydesign.pdf<br />
197