07.01.2015 Views

Circular 328_en

Circular 328_en

Circular 328_en

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ICAO <strong>Circular</strong> <strong>328</strong>-AN/190 29<br />

along with many more. Situations like these will involve technology and equipm<strong>en</strong>t not traditionally assessed in the<br />

curr<strong>en</strong>t airworthiness process.<br />

6.23 Regarding the subject of continuing airworthiness, the remote pilot station should be treated similarly to the<br />

RPA. Additionally, due to the operational nature of the RPAS on long-haul flights, the option of “In Flight Maint<strong>en</strong>ance”<br />

should be studied. It can be forese<strong>en</strong> that the remote pilot station int<strong>en</strong>ded for later stages of the flight could be tak<strong>en</strong><br />

out of service after the RPA has initiated its flight, a situation which would not necessarily prev<strong>en</strong>t the RPA from<br />

continuing. If the remote pilot station can be returned to service or an alternate one used, the flight may be unaffected.<br />

NATIONALITY AND REGISTRATION MARKS<br />

6.24 Annex 7 — Aircraft Nationality and Registration Marks, specifies the minimum Standards for the display of<br />

aircraft marks to indicate appropriate nationality and registration. It is important for UA to comply with aircraft marks so<br />

the UA can be id<strong>en</strong>tified in cases where they come in close proximity to other aircraft, are intercepted, or land at<br />

aerodromes other than the designated landing site.<br />

6.25 Some UA may have difficulty meeting the readily id<strong>en</strong>tified mark requirem<strong>en</strong>t as well as the height<br />

requirem<strong>en</strong>ts for both lighter-than-air and heavier-than-air aircraft as the airframe may be too small. Exemptions for<br />

marks or alternative systems, such as labelling already used for aircraft parts that adequately allow id<strong>en</strong>tification may be<br />

required for small UA. Requirem<strong>en</strong>ts for changes to Annex 7 SARPs as regards to their applicability to UA will be<br />

considered in due time.<br />

RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS AND AIRBORNE NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT<br />

6.26 As a g<strong>en</strong>eral statem<strong>en</strong>t, all aircraft, whether manned or unmanned, must meet the navigation performance<br />

requirem<strong>en</strong>ts for the specific airspace in which they will operate.<br />

6.27 RPA that utilize VLOS as the basis for navigation would not require an on-board means for determining<br />

position or the ability to fly an instrum<strong>en</strong>t approach. Operations of these aircraft are usually conducted under VMC to<br />

<strong>en</strong>sure the remote pilot can maintain continuous and direct visual observation of the RPA and its surrounding<br />

<strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>t.<br />

6.28 RPA that traverse several airspace volumes may operate for the most part under IFR. Such RPA will have<br />

to meet the communications, navigation, and surveillance requirem<strong>en</strong>ts and have an appropriate aircraft operational<br />

certification associated with the airspace.<br />

6.29 In cases where small RPA have a requirem<strong>en</strong>t to fly beyond VLOS, they will need a means to meet<br />

navigation capabilities for the airspace within which they are operating. This could involve an alternate means of<br />

achieving the navigation performance.<br />

SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS<br />

6.30 Unless exempted by the appropriate authorities, all UA will likely be required to be equipped with pressurealtitude<br />

reporting transponders which operate in accordance with the relevant provisions in Annex 10, Volume IV —<br />

Surveillance and Collision Avoidance Systems.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!