08.01.2015 Views

Volume 37 No 1 Feb-Mar 1986.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

Volume 37 No 1 Feb-Mar 1986.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

Volume 37 No 1 Feb-Mar 1986.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Levels of Servioe membership in RAFGSA<br />

clubs have been a matter ·for some concern in<br />

recent years·. There have been frequent complaints<br />

about the difficl,l~Y of recruiting young<br />

Servicemen into the gliding movement, and of<br />

then retaining them. It is gener'ally felt thal the<br />

average age of RAFGSA members is increasing,<br />

and that the pyramid of experience is becoming<br />

distorted, with experienced soaring pilots outnumbering<br />

8o-initjos. Trends such as these, if<br />

substantiated, would have serious implications<br />

for the future functioning of the Association and<br />

it is therefore important to establish a soond factual<br />

basis for management decisions.<br />

Available statistics have been examined in an<br />

attempt to ident~y recent trends in ·the size and<br />

structure of RAFGSA membership, determine<br />

"kely causes for these trends and point out their<br />

possible consequences.<br />

Tme aim of Ihis paper is to identily ways in<br />

which any undesirable trends in the membership<br />

of the RAFGSA can be reverSed.<br />

Size and structure of<br />

RAFGSA membership<br />

Ab-Initio training<br />

_<br />

_<br />

Total strength. Over the last 15 years, total<br />

RAFGSA membership has remained broadly in<br />

the 1100 t@ 1400 range. Sudden changes mave<br />

usually been attributable to the closure or opening,<br />

ofa club. The last reported total membership<br />

figure (<strong>Feb</strong>ruary 1984) was 1291, which is<br />

entirely ,in line with the average historical figure.<br />

There is therefore not yet any clearly identifiable<br />

declining trend in total membership.<br />

Ab-lnlUo membership. Reported ab-initio<br />

membership levels have varied historically in<br />

the range 100 to 400. Again, there is no clear<br />

downward trend. The last reported figure was<br />

299 (<strong>Feb</strong>ruary 198'4). However, it is clear that<br />

there is a large discrepancy between the presolo<br />

figures reported and the numbers actively<br />

under training.<br />

Experienced membership. There appears to<br />

be some statistical substance in the notion that<br />

experience levels are increasing. Whereas ten<br />

years ago, twice as many unqualified solo pilots<br />

were reported as pilots with Silver C or better,<br />

the proportions are now reversed. There is no<br />

doubt that gliders with better performance make<br />

it easier for inexperienced pilots to obtain certificates,'<br />

but there does appear to be a clear<br />

centre of gravity shift towards the experienced<br />

end of the spectrum.<br />

First solos. This impression is strongly reinforced<br />

by the figures for first solos - RAFGSA<br />

produced fewer lhan .half as many new solo<br />

pilots In 1983 (102) as in 1973 (234). In 1978 the<br />

then Air Member (Fit Lt John Williamson) drew<br />

allention to the RAFGSA's declining productivity<br />

and called fOl' the trend to. be reversed. Far from<br />

this happening, the decline has continUed<br />

unchecked.<br />

Just oiler half the clubs said they had some<br />

difficulty in recruiting Servicemen, but more<br />

reported problems in retaining them. Eight out of<br />

ten clubs ident~ied tile pre-solo stage as being<br />

the period when most members left.<br />

RAF G IDING<br />

IRENDS<br />

The RAFGSA has been aware of certain trends In their<br />

movement which have been a cause for concern. These tre.nds<br />

are a mirror Image of those Within the civilian movement that<br />

have beE:n a cause for discussion In recent months. However,<br />

their suggested soluttons are In some Instances radically<br />

different and this precis of Sq ldr Max Bishop's paper by John<br />

Holland, chairman of the BGA Development Committee,<br />

should provide much food for thought and discussion.<br />

When asked how long it Ilad taken for recent<br />

pilots to go solo from starting training, clubs<br />

reported, periods ranging from 21j~ weeks tQ 13<br />

months. The average 'period was 16 weeks.<br />

Assuming 64 launches as average needed for<br />

solo, this works out an average of four<br />

launches/week. Clearly, there is much scope for<br />

making ab-initio training more intensive.<br />

Causes ot pre-sofo 'Wastage ...<br />

<strong>Club</strong> managers were asked to assign a<br />

degree of Importance to each of a number of<br />

factors commonly dted as being responsible for<br />

~he AAFGSA's failure to retain new members.<br />

Their answers revealed the following perceived<br />

order of importance:<br />

a. Alternative attractions<br />

b. Family COlllmitments<br />

c, More time spent grou nd<br />

handling than flying<br />

d. Inhospitable atmosphere for<br />

newcomers<br />

(14pts)<br />

(13pts)<br />

(11 pts)<br />

(1 0.5pts)<br />

e. Poor accommodation on site (9.5pts)<br />

f. lack of transport to sites (7pts)·<br />

g. Service commitments (5pls)<br />

When Irl'vited to list an.y other contribu,tory factors,<br />

clubs mentioned the- following:<br />

a. High ,launch and membership fees.<br />

b. Low Instructor availability, caused by lack of<br />

recognition by service authorities of the importance<br />

of the task.<br />

c. Boredom at the launch-point; requirement to<br />

spend long periods 0f time on the airfield fOl"<br />

very Iillle flying ..<br />

d. lack of proper two-seater training list.<br />

e. Boor continuilyof instruction -pupils fly<br />

with too many different instructors.<br />

The RAFGSA has become more and more<br />

top heavy, and as experienced pilots leave it will<br />

decline. in size lunless appropriate countermeasUres<br />

are introduced. Whereas in the early<br />

1970s about one fifth 01 the total RAFGSA<br />

membership at anyone time had gone solo in<br />

that year, the proportion Is now less than one<br />

tenth; It will not be long before we start to see a<br />

marked decline in total membership, with attendanl<br />

serious implications for financing, size of<br />

fleet, number of clubs and capacity to manage<br />

the clubs and, the Assoclatiol1l. There is therefore<br />

an urgent need tQ tackle the causes of presol,o<br />

wastage ident~ied above. The internal factors<br />

will be treated first.<br />

Accommodation. Good on-site accommoda­<br />

(iOA was considered by ,clubs to be a moderately<br />

Important factor in ,retaining members.<br />

Inhospitable atmosphere. <strong>Club</strong>s frequently<br />

referred to the growth of cliques which made for<br />

an atmQsphere hostile tQ newcomers. <strong>Club</strong><br />

managers need to take specific and effective<br />

steps to make newcomers feel at home, to prevent<br />

·the development of cliques and to ensblre<br />

that "pundits" comml:micate their expertise tQ<br />

others in a sympathetic manner. A properly<br />

organised "buddy" system WQuld be a great<br />

help in shepherding newcomers through their<br />

first weeks 01 gliding <strong>Club</strong> membership.<br />

Boredom at the launch point. Many new<br />

members are put off by the fact that they are<br />

expected to spend long ,periods of time on the<br />

airfield, ground-handling or merely standing<br />

around, waiting for 'occasional five minute<br />

flights. It has long been an established canon of<br />

RAFGSA law that all, or most, 01 the day must<br />

be spent on the gliding field, despite the fact lhat<br />

there is not normally work for more than about<br />

six people at anyone time. fhis is calculated to<br />

put oI:f all but those who

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!