Volume 37 No 1 Feb-Mar 1986.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club
Volume 37 No 1 Feb-Mar 1986.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club
Volume 37 No 1 Feb-Mar 1986.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Levels of Servioe membership in RAFGSA<br />
clubs have been a matter ·for some concern in<br />
recent years·. There have been frequent complaints<br />
about the difficl,l~Y of recruiting young<br />
Servicemen into the gliding movement, and of<br />
then retaining them. It is gener'ally felt thal the<br />
average age of RAFGSA members is increasing,<br />
and that the pyramid of experience is becoming<br />
distorted, with experienced soaring pilots outnumbering<br />
8o-initjos. Trends such as these, if<br />
substantiated, would have serious implications<br />
for the future functioning of the Association and<br />
it is therefore important to establish a soond factual<br />
basis for management decisions.<br />
Available statistics have been examined in an<br />
attempt to ident~y recent trends in ·the size and<br />
structure of RAFGSA membership, determine<br />
"kely causes for these trends and point out their<br />
possible consequences.<br />
Tme aim of Ihis paper is to identily ways in<br />
which any undesirable trends in the membership<br />
of the RAFGSA can be reverSed.<br />
Size and structure of<br />
RAFGSA membership<br />
Ab-Initio training<br />
_<br />
_<br />
Total strength. Over the last 15 years, total<br />
RAFGSA membership has remained broadly in<br />
the 1100 t@ 1400 range. Sudden changes mave<br />
usually been attributable to the closure or opening,<br />
ofa club. The last reported total membership<br />
figure (<strong>Feb</strong>ruary 1984) was 1291, which is<br />
entirely ,in line with the average historical figure.<br />
There is therefore not yet any clearly identifiable<br />
declining trend in total membership.<br />
Ab-lnlUo membership. Reported ab-initio<br />
membership levels have varied historically in<br />
the range 100 to 400. Again, there is no clear<br />
downward trend. The last reported figure was<br />
299 (<strong>Feb</strong>ruary 198'4). However, it is clear that<br />
there is a large discrepancy between the presolo<br />
figures reported and the numbers actively<br />
under training.<br />
Experienced membership. There appears to<br />
be some statistical substance in the notion that<br />
experience levels are increasing. Whereas ten<br />
years ago, twice as many unqualified solo pilots<br />
were reported as pilots with Silver C or better,<br />
the proportions are now reversed. There is no<br />
doubt that gliders with better performance make<br />
it easier for inexperienced pilots to obtain certificates,'<br />
but there does appear to be a clear<br />
centre of gravity shift towards the experienced<br />
end of the spectrum.<br />
First solos. This impression is strongly reinforced<br />
by the figures for first solos - RAFGSA<br />
produced fewer lhan .half as many new solo<br />
pilots In 1983 (102) as in 1973 (234). In 1978 the<br />
then Air Member (Fit Lt John Williamson) drew<br />
allention to the RAFGSA's declining productivity<br />
and called fOl' the trend to. be reversed. Far from<br />
this happening, the decline has continUed<br />
unchecked.<br />
Just oiler half the clubs said they had some<br />
difficulty in recruiting Servicemen, but more<br />
reported problems in retaining them. Eight out of<br />
ten clubs ident~ied tile pre-solo stage as being<br />
the period when most members left.<br />
RAF G IDING<br />
IRENDS<br />
The RAFGSA has been aware of certain trends In their<br />
movement which have been a cause for concern. These tre.nds<br />
are a mirror Image of those Within the civilian movement that<br />
have beE:n a cause for discussion In recent months. However,<br />
their suggested soluttons are In some Instances radically<br />
different and this precis of Sq ldr Max Bishop's paper by John<br />
Holland, chairman of the BGA Development Committee,<br />
should provide much food for thought and discussion.<br />
When asked how long it Ilad taken for recent<br />
pilots to go solo from starting training, clubs<br />
reported, periods ranging from 21j~ weeks tQ 13<br />
months. The average 'period was 16 weeks.<br />
Assuming 64 launches as average needed for<br />
solo, this works out an average of four<br />
launches/week. Clearly, there is much scope for<br />
making ab-initio training more intensive.<br />
Causes ot pre-sofo 'Wastage ...<br />
<strong>Club</strong> managers were asked to assign a<br />
degree of Importance to each of a number of<br />
factors commonly dted as being responsible for<br />
~he AAFGSA's failure to retain new members.<br />
Their answers revealed the following perceived<br />
order of importance:<br />
a. Alternative attractions<br />
b. Family COlllmitments<br />
c, More time spent grou nd<br />
handling than flying<br />
d. Inhospitable atmosphere for<br />
newcomers<br />
(14pts)<br />
(13pts)<br />
(11 pts)<br />
(1 0.5pts)<br />
e. Poor accommodation on site (9.5pts)<br />
f. lack of transport to sites (7pts)·<br />
g. Service commitments (5pls)<br />
When Irl'vited to list an.y other contribu,tory factors,<br />
clubs mentioned the- following:<br />
a. High ,launch and membership fees.<br />
b. Low Instructor availability, caused by lack of<br />
recognition by service authorities of the importance<br />
of the task.<br />
c. Boredom at the launch-point; requirement to<br />
spend long periods 0f time on the airfield fOl"<br />
very Iillle flying ..<br />
d. lack of proper two-seater training list.<br />
e. Boor continuilyof instruction -pupils fly<br />
with too many different instructors.<br />
The RAFGSA has become more and more<br />
top heavy, and as experienced pilots leave it will<br />
decline. in size lunless appropriate countermeasUres<br />
are introduced. Whereas in the early<br />
1970s about one fifth 01 the total RAFGSA<br />
membership at anyone time had gone solo in<br />
that year, the proportion Is now less than one<br />
tenth; It will not be long before we start to see a<br />
marked decline in total membership, with attendanl<br />
serious implications for financing, size of<br />
fleet, number of clubs and capacity to manage<br />
the clubs and, the Assoclatiol1l. There is therefore<br />
an urgent need tQ tackle the causes of presol,o<br />
wastage ident~ied above. The internal factors<br />
will be treated first.<br />
Accommodation. Good on-site accommoda<br />
(iOA was considered by ,clubs to be a moderately<br />
Important factor in ,retaining members.<br />
Inhospitable atmosphere. <strong>Club</strong>s frequently<br />
referred to the growth of cliques which made for<br />
an atmQsphere hostile tQ newcomers. <strong>Club</strong><br />
managers need to take specific and effective<br />
steps to make newcomers feel at home, to prevent<br />
·the development of cliques and to ensblre<br />
that "pundits" comml:micate their expertise tQ<br />
others in a sympathetic manner. A properly<br />
organised "buddy" system WQuld be a great<br />
help in shepherding newcomers through their<br />
first weeks 01 gliding <strong>Club</strong> membership.<br />
Boredom at the launch point. Many new<br />
members are put off by the fact that they are<br />
expected to spend long ,periods of time on the<br />
airfield, ground-handling or merely standing<br />
around, waiting for 'occasional five minute<br />
flights. It has long been an established canon of<br />
RAFGSA law that all, or most, 01 the day must<br />
be spent on the gliding field, despite the fact lhat<br />
there is not normally work for more than about<br />
six people at anyone time. fhis is calculated to<br />
put oI:f all but those who