Newberry Springs Elementary School Home of the Bobcats

Home of the Bobcats
Newberry Springs
Elementary School
Single Plan for Student Achievement
2010-2011
2011
Presentation to the Board of Trustees
Date: 2/08/11

AYP Goals 2009-2010
2010
Percent Proficient - Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO’s)
English-Language Arts
Target 56.8 %
Met all percent proficient rate criteria Yes
Mathematics
Target 58.0 %
Met all percent proficient rate criteria No
GROUPS
Valid
Scores
Number At
or Above
Proficient
Percent At
or Above
Proficient
Met 2010
AYP
Criteria
Valid
Scores
Number At
or Above
Proficient
Percent At
or Above
Proficient
Met 2010
AYP
Criteria
Schoolwide
103
48
46.6
Yes
105
45
42.9
No
Asian/Filipino
1/2
-
-
-
1/2
-
-
-
Hispanic or Latino
45
19
42.2
-
45
18
40.0
-
White
53
27
50.9
Yes
55
25
45.5
No
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
13*
3
23.1
-
13
4
30.8
-
Students with
Disabilities
14
6
42.9
-
16
5
31.2
-
English Learners
19
8
42.1
-
19
9
47.4
-
* Correction submitted to CDE (current count is 141 students, or, 85% eligible)

API Goals 2009-2010
2010
Star 2010
Percent
Tested
Number
included in
the 2009 API
2009 API
(Base)
2009
Statewide
Rank
2009 Similar
Schools
Rank
2009-2010
Growth
Target
2010API
Target
2010 API
Score
98%
55
748*
3*
NA
5
753
762
Student Groups
Number of
Pupils
Included in
2009 API
Numerically
Significant
2009
Subgroup
API Base
2009-2010
Growth
Target
2010 API
Target
2010 API
Score
African American, not
Hispanic
1
No
Pending
Hispanic or Latino
21
No
White not Hispanic
30
No
Economically
Disadvantaged
43
No
Students with Disabilities
6
No
English Learners
7
No
* API is calculated for a small school defined as having from 11-99 valid scores.

Newberry Springs Elementary School
Longitudinal CST Results All Students
60
51.2
52.7
% Proficient or Advanced
50
40
30
20
30.2
38.3
34.7
32.7
46.6
44.7
46.5
42.9
10
0
ELA Math
2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010

Newberry Springs Elementary School
90
Math CST
80
78
% Proficient or Advanced
70
60
50
40
30
20
50
27
46
57
54
66
55
32
40
47
48
50
60
45
40
33 33
24
26
10
0
Grade 2 Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010

70
Newberry Springs Elementary School
English Language Arts CST
65
60
54
% Proficient or Advanced
50
40
30
20
28
3, 46
23
26
43
9, 21
32
28
36
44
15, 32
24
32
27
21, 36
28
38
10
10
0
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4
Grade 5
2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010

Newberry Springs Elementary School
CELDT Assessment
700
CELDT Scale Score
600
500
400
300
488
460
440
423
467
433
562
484
499
523 515
531
569
527
565
507
489
570
490
579 586
200
100
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Grades 1-5
(09 - 10) (10 - 11)

Newberry Springs Elementary School
• 2009-2010 California Healthy Kids Survey
Results
• 63% of students feel safe at school
• 70% report high levels of a caring
relationship with a teacher or other adult at
school
• 80% report high levels of high expectations
from a teacher or other adult at their school

Analysis of Data/Outcomes
2009-2010 SPSA AYP Goals
• AYP was met in English Language Arts (ELA)
• AYP was not met in Math
• Office referrals and suspensions increased
• All staff trained in OARS
API
• Met API Targets
• Grew 14 points from 748 to 762
Percent Proficient or Advanced
• Percent Proficient or Advanced increased in ELA; not in math
Discipline Reports
• Although an increase was observed; teachers are now
documenting office referrals/suspensions through Infinite
Campus

School Goal
Goals 2010-2011
2011
• By May 2011, students in ELA and Math who participate in
tutoring/RTI will improve by moving up one performance band.
Program Support Goals
• NSES will increase teacher, student, and parent technology
usage both in school and at home as measured by a pre/post
survey.
• NSES will continue to build a strong PLC based on shared
strategies learned at conferences/in services, focused on
student learning.
• We will continue to reduce discipline referrals by 25% over the
next 3 years.

Our Single Plan for Student Achievement
Focus on the Standards, Blueprints, Pacing Guides
-Strategic Plan alignment # 1.1-1.3, 3.1- 3.3
Focus on Instructional Time
Response to Intervention
Extended Day Reinforcement
-Strategic Plan alignment # 3.1- 3.3, 4.1- 4.2
Focus on Data Collection and Share in PLC
-Strategic Plan alignment # 4
Student Monitoring Conferences (3 times a year)
Student Success Team Meetings allow a team of
parents, teachers, and administrators to develop goals to
reinforce student success.
-Strategic Plan alignment # 4.1

• Data Analysis in PLC’s
How Will We Monitor,
How Will We Know
• CST, CELDT, GATE, Benchmarks, Weekly/Chapter Tests
• OARS, Pearson Assessments, AR, AM
• Student Monitoring Conferences ( 3 x per yr)
• Response to Intervention/Tutors
• Student Success Team
• After School/ In Class Tutoring
• Math Club
• Monthly Attendance Report
• OARS Usage Reports
• Pearson Professional Development Full Implementation

Strengths
• There is a strong sense of ownership of our
community school. Parents, teachers, support staff
all work toward student success. (Record high Back
to School attendance, 100% parent conferences.)
• An experienced, cohesive staff that works together
to plan and implement success for students. (All
staff tutors after school.)
• English Learner Advisory Committee (ELAC) and
School Site Council (SSC) were combined.
• All school to home flyers are translated into Spanish.
• All teachers have daily communication with home
through binders/planners.

Support Needed to
Meet Student Needs
• Need for Spanish translators and Spanish translating
software for communication between school and
home.
• updated computers and software.
• Need to continue to refine benchmarks to State
Standards and pacing guides.
• We need to encourage the use of the Parent Portal
• Continue professional development in OARS,
Pearson (ELA), and Math