10.01.2015 Views

On Centrism and Dualism - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

On Centrism and Dualism - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

On Centrism and Dualism - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CENTRISM AND DUALISM<br />

strategy for perpetuating <strong>and</strong> increasing the house estate. Both marriage strategies, exogamy<br />

<strong>and</strong> endogamy, were practiced concurrently, one to increase access to property <strong>and</strong> the other<br />

to prevent portions of the estate from leaving the house in marriage (ibid.: 182-183). 67 With<br />

regard to this explicit emphasis on affinal strategies, marriage becomes the most important<br />

social principle in LÉVI-STRAUSS conception of houses; a fact that situates the concept of<br />

house societies neatly in his former theory of affinal alliance (GILLESPIE 2000b: 26) <strong>and</strong> yet<br />

another proof of LÉVI-STRAUSS’ general belief in the structural significance of affinity.<br />

In order to further develop his argument <strong>and</strong> to highlight that the house represents a social<br />

category <strong>and</strong> not merely an architectural form or the locus of a household, LÉVI-STRAUSS<br />

turned to medieval <strong>and</strong> early modern Europe. In their characterization of the noble houses of<br />

Europe historians had described the similar kind of social entity that had confounded BOAS<br />

<strong>and</strong> KROEBER in North America.<br />

The medievalist Karl SCHMIED (1957) characterized the medieval house as something quite<br />

different from a family or lineage. The noble ‘lineage’(Adelsgeschlecht) constituting the<br />

house, does not coincide with the agnatic line <strong>and</strong> is often devoid of a biological basis, instead<br />

consisting of a “spiritual <strong>and</strong> material heritage, comprising dignity, origins, kinship, names<br />

<strong>and</strong> symbols, position, power <strong>and</strong> wealth, which once assumed […] took account of the<br />

antiquity <strong>and</strong> distinction of the other noble lineages” (LÉVI-STRAUSS 1982: 174). LÉVI-<br />

STRAUSS points out that in this case, the analytic language of the historian <strong>and</strong> anthropologist<br />

resemble each other.<br />

His [Lévi-Strauss’s, B.B.] definition emphasizes the perpetuation of, <strong>and</strong> the maintenance of an<br />

estate by, a personne morale, a long-lived entity subject to rights <strong>and</strong> obligations. The “language”<br />

of kinship <strong>and</strong>/or affinity is employed to achieve these twinned goals by providing the means to<br />

legitimate the intact transfer of the estate across generations of house members (GILLESPIE 2000b:<br />

27).<br />

Even though LÉVI-STRAUSS’ originally came up with his house concept in the context of<br />

analyzing patrilineal societies (cf. GILLESPIE 2000b: 28), he later focused his attention on<br />

cognatic societies, especially those of Austronesia.<br />

Cognatic kinship systems, in which kinship status is accounted equally through both parents,<br />

had for a long time troubled scholars, who, according to the premises of descent theory, were<br />

used to identify unilineal principles at the heart of social organization. In addition to the term<br />

67 “As was seen in connection with the Kwakiutl, exogamous marriage is used to capture titles endogamous<br />

marriage is used to prevent their leaving the house once they have been acquired. It is therefore a good strategy<br />

to use the two principles concurrently, according to the time <strong>and</strong> opportunity, in order to maximize gains <strong>and</strong><br />

minimize losses.” (LEVI-STRAUSS 1982: 183)<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!