11.01.2015 Views

MIL-HDBK-244A 6 apr 90.pdf

MIL-HDBK-244A 6 apr 90.pdf

MIL-HDBK-244A 6 apr 90.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>MIL</strong>-<strong>HDBK</strong>-<strong>244A</strong><br />

5.1.5 Mechanical interface. The factors to be analyzed and<br />

examined, include but are not limited to those below, to determine the mechanical<br />

interface problem areas are as follows:<br />

(a) Stores characteristics- The stores functional or operational<br />

characteristics,mission objectives, and their integration into the<br />

aircraft systems should be examined to better identify all factors associated<br />

with a compatible installation of stores onto the aircraft. The attach<br />

mechanism, the functional controls, and the store configuration should be<br />

known to allow the engineer to perform appropriate trade-off studies to arrive<br />

at an optimum employment of the weapon.<br />

.<br />

(b) Store geometry and attaching hardware location -<br />

The store geometry and location of attaching hardware at the aircraft/weapon<br />

interface shall be designed to provide interchangeabilitybetween various<br />

types of aircraft and interserviceusage. The designer should consult the<br />

Allied Operations Publication (AOP-12) prepared by the Joint Ordnance<br />

Commanders Sub Group (JOCG). This manual will prove most useful in revealing<br />

possible interference between munitions or stores and the structures, pylons,<br />

bomb racks, etc. of the aircraft meant to carry them.<br />

-.. .“.<br />

(c) Carriage configuration- The development of the<br />

aircraft/weapon interfacemust take into considerationthe type carriage that<br />

will be incorporated into the aircraft, such as pylons, bomb bay, semi-submerged,<br />

or conformal. Shaping of the aircraft fuselage, control surfaces,<br />

and pylons are factors that must be coordinatedwith the suspension equipment<br />

and stores for proper system integration. Each discrete type of carriage<br />

must be adequately developed for maximum compatibilitywith existing and<br />

proposed suspension equipment and stores.<br />

(d) Weight distribution- The carriage configuration<br />

must be developed with,full considerationfor store weights distribution on<br />

the aircraft such that a full complement of stores or any partial load has<br />

minimal effect on the aircraft static margin limits. In addition, the carriage<br />

configuration mu’stbe developed recognizing that expensive and limited<br />

-availabilitystores mayneed to be returned to the airfield or aircraft if<br />

they are unused. The release sequence must also be evaluated to determine<br />

that normal release with possible random “hung” store, or stores, does not<br />

cause instability of the aircraft. Aircraft response and weapon dispersion<br />

effects should be assessed.<br />

(e) “Suspension equipment compatibility,-.The physical<br />

characteristicsof the suspension equipment must be known to the engineer to<br />

allow proper integration of the equipment to the ‘aircraftside of the interface.<br />

The ~hvsical characteristicsconsist of the external configuration of<br />

the suspens~ofiequipment, identifying size, shape, mounting holes-or provimaterials;<br />

sions; strength; stiffness; load factors; ejector force range<br />

connection locations; and access requirements. The aircraft “ nterface should “<br />

be compatible with requirements of <strong>MIL</strong>-A-8591.<br />

31<br />

Source: http://www.assistdocs.com -- Downloaded: 2009-07-16T13:55Z<br />

Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!