12.01.2015 Views

Innovative needs

Innovative needs

Innovative needs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 nd BEPART Conference<br />

Towards Entrepreneurial Regions:<br />

Universities & Innovation-Networks Challenged<br />

by the Knowledge Society<br />

The characteristics of the<br />

innovative <strong>needs</strong> of Polish high<br />

technology SMEs<br />

Edward Stawasz<br />

Paweł Głodek<br />

Tartu, Estonia, 26 - 27 October 2006


<strong>Innovative</strong> <strong>needs</strong> and their suppliers<br />

Company<br />

(<strong>Innovative</strong> <strong>needs</strong>)<br />

•TRAINING<br />

•INFORMATION<br />

•FINANCE<br />

•BUSINESS NEEDS<br />

POTENTIAL<br />

SUPPLIERS<br />

•R+D SECTOR<br />

•SUPPORT<br />

INSTITUTIONS<br />

•OTHER COMPANIES<br />

•OTHERS


Data sources<br />

• LORIS project – Regional Innovation Strategy<br />

for Lodz Region<br />

• 55 face-to-face in-depth structured interviews<br />

• small or medium-sized enterprises<br />

• modern sectors, large proportion of firms’<br />

sales/production were related to new/improved<br />

products/services<br />

• comparision with outcomes of other research<br />

projects<br />

• Lower Silesia ‘04<br />

• Silesia ’02 and Silesia ‘06


<strong>Innovative</strong> abilities<br />

• innovation sources<br />

• own ideas and resources<br />

• links to the sources located outside of the<br />

region - mainly imitation strategy<br />

• limited ability to create and develop<br />

innovations, mainly in the area of<br />

monitoring, cooperation with the partners<br />

and adaptation of the external solutions


Cooperation with R+D institutions<br />

• Nearly 2/3 of the companies declare some<br />

sort of contacts with R+D institutions<br />

• Almost ½ of the companies cannot<br />

evaluate the quality of R+D offer because<br />

of too little knowledge about them<br />

• Relatively low significance of cooperation<br />

with R+D institutions


Nature of cooperation with R+D<br />

institutions<br />

• mostly institutes and HEIs – almost no<br />

industrial R+D departments<br />

• if cooperation exists, it is rather a longterm<br />

cooperation<br />

• informal ties based on the personal<br />

relationship predominate – a minimum<br />

level of formal agreements


Spin-offs vs. non spin-offs<br />

Spin-outs from R+D institutions<br />

• relatively intensive ties to R+D institutions<br />

• opinion about R+D institutions research and<br />

knowledge potential is relatively high<br />

• knowledge how to deal with people and<br />

institution<br />

Non spin-offs<br />

• limited level or simply no connections with R+D<br />

institutions<br />

• little knowledge about R+D institutions potential<br />

and possibilities to cooperate


Cooperation with enterprises in the<br />

area of innovation<br />

• Almost all interviewed enterprises cooperate in a<br />

various way with other companies in the area of<br />

innovation<br />

• Cooperation is evaluated as highly valuable<br />

• Only in one in four cases the main business<br />

partner comes from the region<br />

• In one in four cases the main business partner<br />

comes from the region – strong international ties


Cooperation with enterprises in the<br />

area of innovation<br />

• joint implementation works (e.g. the<br />

provision of assistance in the field of<br />

cooperation and joint production),<br />

• information exchange<br />

• research and technical services


Cooperation with enterprises in the<br />

area of innovation - barriers<br />

• a weak information system related to the production and<br />

technology offer of potential business partners<br />

• few opportunities for contact with other companies<br />

• not adequate technology nor the professional level of<br />

regional enterprises<br />

• excessive cost of cooperation<br />

• reluctance for cooperation shown by large companies<br />

• problems with cooperation management e.g. costs and<br />

benefits evaluation<br />

• fear of the loss of control on the company and know-how<br />

– it concerns mainly small companies


Cooperation with support<br />

institutions<br />

• very low level of cooperation – ¼ firms indicate at least<br />

some contacts with them<br />

• ’02 accidental nature of such contacts as well as a very<br />

low impact of provided support<br />

• ’04 and ’06 gradually sharpening of firms attitudes and<br />

cooperation behaviour<br />

• still low level of the knowledge about support institutions<br />

and their offer<br />

• UE funds gradually influence this situation<br />

• strengtening of suport institution sector<br />

• new experiences of SMEs


Conclusions<br />

• companies are the most important partners in<br />

the area of innovation<br />

• low level of cooperation with R+D institutions<br />

• significance of informal way of cooperation to<br />

R+D institutions<br />

• low but gradually growing significance of<br />

cooperation with support institutions<br />

• little role of region in the innovative activity<br />

• gradually changing <strong>needs</strong> and conditions of<br />

innovative activity


2 nd BEPART Conference<br />

Towards Entrepreneurial Regions:<br />

Universities & Innovation-Networks Challenged<br />

by the Knowledge Society<br />

The characteristics of the<br />

innovative <strong>needs</strong> of Polish high<br />

technology SMEs<br />

Edward Stawasz<br />

Paweł Głodek<br />

Tartu, Estonia, 26 - 27 October 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!