12.11.2012 Views

THE CD PLAYER PLUS - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine

THE CD PLAYER PLUS - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine

THE CD PLAYER PLUS - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Listening Feedback Room<br />

of a MacBook Pro laptop computer, and on coffee break. The dynamics were Some conclusions<br />

plugged the same optical cable into it. anything but natural, and the…aw, the There’s much talk in audiophile<br />

There was a noticeable improve- heck with it.<br />

circles of the inadequacy of USB conment,<br />

though a subtle one. More of the We had one more variation to try. nectivity for high-quality audio. In this<br />

fine detail in Margie’s voice emerged, We own an Edirol UA-25 interface box, limited set of tests, however, USB beat<br />

making the song even more expressive, which we use for digital recording with<br />

and increasing Another the (still imperfect) illu- unique our MacBook feature!<br />

Pro, and which we also use<br />

the optical link, even though the optical<br />

was plugged into a very high-grade<br />

sion that she was there with us. However with our test microphone for instrument converter. What does it mean?<br />

the change of source You didn’t know solve how most all the audio tests. magazines It includes do their both reviews: a DAC a and number its of We were intrigued by the huge dif-<br />

problems. Louder reviewers, passages some remained with doubtful opposite, “reference” an analog-to-digital systems, are assigned converter. reviews ference of between the two TOSLINK<br />

hard and not quite individual natural. components. No optical cable this time. We plugged cables. The no-name cable is going to<br />

A preliminary UHF, conclusion on the was other that hand, the maintains Edirol into actual the reference MacBook systems, Pro’s USB on which pick up a name — our own — and we<br />

the process of all transmitting reviews are music done. over All our connector, reviewers and participate plugged in the each Edirol review. to our The will add it to our Audiophile Store. That<br />

the air is not quite main transparent. article is based on the P-8 concensus, preamp if with there a pair is one, of Atlas but sometimes Naviga- on said, we suspect that we can find far<br />

On the Airport divergence. Express the Montor cables. We then played A Song for You better optical cables yet, and we will go<br />

ster cable had turned And then in a second-best each reviewer gets once to more. write a “Crosstalk,” a personal comhunting<br />

for them.<br />

performance. ment, We plugged which may it into even the disagree It with wasn’t the others. quite the equal of the We also know that it’s possible to<br />

MacBook Pro and There listened is no again. pressure To no to confirm. Eximus playing What you the read original is really <strong>CD</strong>, what with we get true high-end performance using a<br />

one’s surprise think. it turned And in that a miserable is what makes a sound UHF that unique.<br />

was a little more laid back different connection, namely Ethernet:<br />

performance. The sound was out of and understated. Still, after suffering see our review of the Linn Klimax DS<br />

focus, with a surprising lack of energy, through several listens with optical in UHF No. 84). Ethernet uses packet<br />

and the tone was cold and lifeless. Not cables, we were grateful for what the switching, an asynchronous protocol<br />

good.<br />

Edirol offered us.<br />

immune to jitter and other timing<br />

We wondered, if only fleetingly, what The snare drum had returned from errors.<br />

the laptop’s own converter would sound break, for one thing. The presence was Having come this far, we plan to<br />

like it we plugged an analog cable from vastly better. The piano was particularly continue exploring ways to get better<br />

it directly to our Moon P-8 preamplifier. attractive, and so was Margie Gibson’s sound from music stored on your hard<br />

We didn’t make it all the way through astonishing voice. Her lip and tongue disc. Some improvements will come<br />

the song. The accompanying instru- sounds were audible once more, adding from genuine technological advances,<br />

ments were bunched up, all except for to the feeling that she was there, singing and some from quiet refinements. We’ll<br />

the snare drum, which appeared to be a song for us.<br />

let you know what we find.<br />

What’s not to like? It’s small and affordable,<br />

and it provides a pretty good rendition<br />

of your computer’s stored music.<br />

You may be tempted to herald its arrival<br />

at home with a confident smile, as in Ta<br />

daaa…look, honey, no cables. Expecting overwhelming<br />

praise, you’ll probably have to<br />

settle for a slightly raised eyebrow. Or, filled<br />

with inner pride at an affordable upgrade,<br />

you may casually declare, “Guess what,<br />

honey…no new mortgage.” Two eyebrows.<br />

However it turns out, let your desktop or<br />

laptop sing with its new voice for a few days,<br />

and you’ll love the convenience so much that<br />

the entire family may soon vote to bring<br />

home its twin.<br />

—Albert Simon<br />

It occurs to me that judging the potential<br />

of music-from-computer is like judging the<br />

potential of the Compact Disc by listening<br />

54 ULTRA HIGH FIDELITY <strong>Magazine</strong><br />

CROSSTALK<br />

to the Philips <strong>CD</strong>P-101 of 1982. Though<br />

both are digital sources, the <strong>CD</strong> is a mature<br />

technology, and computer audio has only just<br />

taken its first steps.<br />

Notwithstanding the uneven results we<br />

heard with the Airport Express, I think it<br />

has huge potential, given its affordable price.<br />

Not many people will add a $2000 laptop to<br />

an audio system, but the little Apple box costs<br />

next to nothing. With a better link, my guess<br />

is that it will deliver on its promise.<br />

There’s something magical about having<br />

all your music just a click or two away. This<br />

is, in any case, the future.<br />

—Gerard Rejskind<br />

Hi-fi was the cool thing to tinker with<br />

in the Fifties, today it’s computers, wireless<br />

networks, digital music libraries. On the<br />

evidence of these sessions, even with a good<br />

modern DAC, you can’t pop your laptop into<br />

your system where your <strong>CD</strong> player was and<br />

expect even the same quality of sound.<br />

Pretty good digital sound, yes, especially<br />

if you use an optical cable instead of<br />

a wireless link. The Airport Express gave a<br />

good-sized image on Green Blade. The optical<br />

connection via the Monster cable let me<br />

hear that and also the marvellous lift in spirit<br />

at the final crescendo, despite a coloration I<br />

would call “golden afternoon.” The no-name<br />

optical lost the gold and had more detail,<br />

like the breath sounds on A Song for You.<br />

An analog cable from the laptop’s earphone<br />

jack — oh, I was getting tired of this. The<br />

session began to seem long, and I thought<br />

fondly of the reference player.<br />

A computer source may be a worthwhile<br />

step on the way to a great system, but none<br />

of what I heard this time would be a goal I<br />

would aim for.<br />

—Toby Earp

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!