13.01.2015 Views

DNA Clearance From Antibody Preparations Using Mustang® Q ...

DNA Clearance From Antibody Preparations Using Mustang® Q ...

DNA Clearance From Antibody Preparations Using Mustang® Q ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

USD 2278<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> <strong>Clearance</strong> <strong>From</strong> <strong>Antibody</strong><br />

<strong>Preparations</strong> <strong>Using</strong> Mustang ® Q<br />

Membrane-Model Study<br />

2


<strong>DNA</strong> <strong>Clearance</strong> <strong>From</strong> <strong>Antibody</strong> <strong>Preparations</strong> <strong>Using</strong><br />

Mustang Q Membrane-Model Study<br />

Introduction<br />

Why Remove <strong>DNA</strong><br />

The world market demand for monoclonal<br />

IgG's and recombinant protein is growing<br />

rapidly. Improvements in cell culture techniques<br />

have significantly improved the efficiency of<br />

monoclonal production with concentrations of<br />

monoclonal antibody of over 1g per liter, being<br />

reported in hybridoma supernatants.<br />

However, during the cell growth and the<br />

harvesting steps of the cells, a certain amount<br />

of nucleic acid may contaminate the product<br />

of interest. The nucleic acid contamination<br />

may come from the host cell <strong>DNA</strong>-either<br />

genomic, vector-or retroviral RNA, which is<br />

considered a greater risk. Fragments of sizes<br />

larger than 2 kilobases are considered to be<br />

potentially carcinogenic, and therefore nucleic<br />

acids have to be removed from the final product.<br />

The Center for Biological Evaluation and<br />

Research (1) in the USA, initially defined the<br />

maximum allowable nucleic acid contamination<br />

as 10 pg per dose. The World Health<br />

Organisation (2) has stated that 100 pg per dose<br />

could be acceptable. More recently, a newer<br />

'Point to consider' from the CBER (3) now states<br />

that "Lot to lot testing for <strong>DNA</strong> contents in<br />

biological products produced in cell lines<br />

should be performed and lot release<br />

limits established that reflect a level of purity<br />

that can be achieved reasonably and<br />

consistently." This all suggests that a rapid<br />

and cost efficient method which clears nucleic<br />

acid to below acceptable (and ideally<br />

detectable) levels is required.<br />

Why use Membrane Chromatography to Remove <strong>DNA</strong><br />

Several methods are available for nucleic with a larger surface area and therefore fewer<br />

acid removal. Among them, we can mention diffusion limitations. At the same time<br />

anion exchange chromatography, which has Mustang Q membrane when compared<br />

proved to be quite effective due to the high to conventional resin based media has<br />

negative charge of nucleic acids, which bind at least a 10 fold higher binding capacity<br />

at high ionic strengths and at pH >2. Under (25 mg <strong>DNA</strong> / mL of media) combined<br />

these conditions most biotherapeutic proteins with much higher flow rates (more than<br />

do not interact with anion exchange matrices. 10 CV / min).<br />

Therefore, anion exchange (4, 5) as a first step<br />

These units have thus been designed as<br />

is generally considered to be suitable as it can<br />

capsules and cartridges for single use<br />

contribute to reduce the viscosity of the<br />

disposable product. Therefore, neither<br />

protein feed stream. Alternatively, both cation<br />

cleaning nor cleaning validation is necessary,<br />

exchange in a flow through mode and<br />

which is helpful because it can be difficult<br />

nucleases (6, 7) have been used for removal of<br />

or impossible to demonstrate complete<br />

contaminating nucleic acids.<br />

removal of nucleic acids when cleaning<br />

Although conventional anion exchange resin conventional resin media.<br />

chromatography can be used to remove<br />

nucleic acid impurities, <strong>DNA</strong> is a very large<br />

biomolecule (can be up to 500 nm in diameter<br />

compared to a typical 1-10 nm globular<br />

protein) and it has difficulties diffusing into the<br />

small pores (20-100 nm) of resin beads. In<br />

contrast, Mustang Q anion exchange<br />

membrane has much larger pores (800 nm)<br />

2


<strong>DNA</strong> <strong>Clearance</strong> <strong>From</strong> <strong>Antibody</strong> <strong>Preparations</strong> <strong>Using</strong><br />

Mustang Q Membrane-Model Study<br />

Large <strong>DNA</strong> molecules<br />

have direct convective<br />

access to Mustang Q<br />

membrane groups<br />

without steric hindrance<br />

Beads 1µm Mustang<br />

slow<br />

fast<br />

slow<br />

slow<br />

fast<br />

slow<br />

fast<br />

fast<br />

slow<br />

fast<br />

fast<br />

fast<br />

fast<br />

fast<br />

fast<br />

fast fast<br />

Figure 1: Comparison of molecular<br />

access of nucleic acids in membranes<br />

and conventional gel media<br />

Solid surface<br />

Area of diffusive flow<br />

Area of convective flow<br />

• 150 Å diameter globular protein<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> (20,000 bp fragments shown)<br />

What is Mustang Q Media <br />

Mustang Q membrane is made by coating<br />

and tightly crosslinking a highly stable<br />

hydrophilic quarternary amine polymer onto<br />

the surface of polyethersulfone membrane.<br />

The end result is a membrane with an open<br />

nodular structure which has the benefits of a<br />

high surface area and binding capacity for<br />

negatively charged macromolecules, combined<br />

with good mechanical properties, including<br />

800 nm pores to allow for very high flow rates.<br />

Single use Mustang Q units are made of 16<br />

layers of this membrane which are then pleated<br />

and assembled into a ready-to-use capsule<br />

format. The Mustang coin unit is a scaled<br />

down version of the Mustang capsules. It is<br />

ideal for performing scale down experiments,<br />

particularly for validation studies.<br />

The coin unit uses the same 16 layer<br />

Mustang Q membrane that is used in<br />

Mustang Q capsules and cartridges.<br />

<strong>Clearance</strong> of Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong> from a<br />

Polyclonal IgG Preparation <strong>Using</strong> the<br />

Mustang Q Media<br />

The goal of the experiments was to find loading<br />

conditions (buffer composition, pH and ionic<br />

strength) under which <strong>DNA</strong> but not an Ig G<br />

preparation, binds to Mustang Q membrane.<br />

Every monoclonal antibody has a different pI<br />

which will determine its ability to bind to<br />

Mustang Q membrane at any given pH.<br />

Therefore it is difficult to establish a method<br />

suitable for every monoclonal antibody with<br />

Mustang Q membrane, based on just one<br />

example. For this reason we chose a bovine<br />

Ig G preparation which contains many different<br />

Ig G's with a broad spectrum of pI's , therefore<br />

covering many possible eventualities.<br />

Due to its relatively large size and highly<br />

polyanionic nature above pH 2, <strong>DNA</strong> has a<br />

very high affinity for anion exchange<br />

membranes compared to smaller and more<br />

neutrally charged antibodies. Therefore it was<br />

predicted that binding in slightly acidic and<br />

<strong>Clearance</strong> of Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong> from a<br />

Polyclonal IgG Preparation <strong>Using</strong> the<br />

Mustang Q Media<br />

moderate ionic strength-should favor <strong>DNA</strong><br />

binding and result in the Ig G fraction having<br />

very little or no interaction with the anionexchange<br />

Mustang Q membrane. To make<br />

separation more challenging and applicable<br />

to industrial applications, the experiments were<br />

carried out using phosphate buffers (as a worst<br />

case scenario) which normally interfere with<br />

anion exchange chromatography due to the<br />

high ionic strength and multiple negative charge<br />

of the phosphate anion.<br />

3


<strong>DNA</strong> <strong>Clearance</strong> <strong>From</strong> <strong>Antibody</strong> <strong>Preparations</strong> <strong>Using</strong><br />

Mustang Q Membrane-Model Study<br />

Protocols and Results<br />

Three separate experiments were carried out,<br />

using first <strong>DNA</strong> alone then polyclonal Ig G<br />

alone and finally a combination of both.<br />

For the first experiment (Figure 2a), a solution<br />

of Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong> was made up to a<br />

concentration of 20 µg/mL in 25mM Sodium<br />

Phosphate buffer pH 6.0 + 150 mM NaCl.<br />

A total of 360 mL (7 mg) of this solution was<br />

In the final experiment (Figure 2c), 380 mL of<br />

a bovine Immunoglobulin G solution (4 mg/mL<br />

in phosphate buffer) was spiked with<br />

Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong> (20 µg/mL) and subsequently<br />

loaded on Mustang Q coin using the<br />

conditions described in Experiment 1.<br />

Absorbance at 260 and 280 nm were<br />

continuously monitored. <strong>DNA</strong> breakthrough<br />

was obtained at 322 mL as judged by an<br />

increase in absorbance at 260 nm. Washing<br />

and elution were carried out according<br />

to Experiment 1 and 14 mL fractions<br />

collected and assayed for <strong>DNA</strong> content<br />

using our own <strong>DNA</strong> hybridization testing<br />

method described in the application note<br />

USD 2279 (Figure 3).<br />

loaded on to a Mustang Q coin equilibrated<br />

with 25 mM Sodium Phosphate buffer pH 6.0<br />

+ 150 mM NaCl at 20 CV/min, while monitoring<br />

absorbance at 260 nm. After washing with 40<br />

membranes volumes of equilibration buffer,<br />

bound <strong>DNA</strong> was eluted by a gradient of<br />

150 to 1000 mM NaCl in 40 CV of equilibration<br />

buffer. Breakthrough was obtained at<br />

approximately 315 mL, as indicated by an<br />

increase in absorbance at 260 nm.<br />

Absorbance (260nm)<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33<br />

Fraction Number<br />

Figure 2a: Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong><br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Conductivity (mS/cm)<br />

This first experiment determined that Calf<br />

Thymus <strong>DNA</strong> elutes in these conditions above<br />

at a salt concentration greater than 500 mM.<br />

For the second experiment (Figure 2b), a<br />

solution of Bovine Immunoglobulin G was<br />

made up to a concentration of 2 mg/mL in<br />

equilibration buffer. A total of 380 mL (760 mg)<br />

Absorbance (280nm)<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Conductivity (mS/cm)<br />

of this Immunoglobulin G solution was loaded<br />

Fraction Number<br />

on to a Mustang Q coin using exactly the<br />

same method as described for Experiment 1,<br />

and absorbance at 280 nm was continuously<br />

monitored. Washing and elution were carried<br />

out according to Experiment 1.<br />

This second experiment demonstrated that in<br />

the chosen conditions, the chosen bovine<br />

Immunoglobulin G does not bind to Mustang<br />

Q Media.<br />

Experiments 1 and 2 determined the optimum<br />

conditions under which no globulin binds (the<br />

product of interest) while <strong>DNA</strong> binds (the<br />

impurity) to Mustang Q media.<br />

Figure 2c: Bovine Gamma Globulin<br />

Absorbance<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

AU (260nm)<br />

AU (280nm)<br />

0<br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37<br />

Fraction Number<br />

Figure 2c: Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong> and Bovine Gamma Globulin<br />

Figure 2. Chromatogram of respectively Calf thymus <strong>DNA</strong> (a) Bovine Ig G solution (b) and Bovine<br />

Ig G solution spiked with Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong>(c) on Mustang Q coin<br />

Adsorption and washing buffer: Phosphate 25 mM pH 6.0 + 150 mM NaCl<br />

Elution buffer: gradient of 150 to 1000 mM NaCl in 40 CV of equilibration buffer<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Conductivity (mS/cm)<br />

4


<strong>DNA</strong> <strong>Clearance</strong> <strong>From</strong> <strong>Antibody</strong> <strong>Preparations</strong> <strong>Using</strong><br />

Mustang Q Membrane-Model Study<br />

Under the conditions chosen in these<br />

experiments, Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong> binds strongly<br />

to Mustang Q membrane. The hybridization<br />

test demonstrated that no <strong>DNA</strong> was detected<br />

Fraction 5<br />

until fraction 24 (sensitivity of the assay is<br />

2.5 pg/mL). It supports the fact that there<br />

is no <strong>DNA</strong> breakthrough detected by P 32<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> hybridization (Figure 3) until saturation<br />

Fraction 24<br />

is obtained (with binding capacities of<br />

18.5 and 18.3 mg/mL of Mustang Q membrane<br />

for Experiments 1 and 3 respectively).<br />

Fraction 25<br />

At the same time, very little binding of<br />

Immunoglobulin G (< 0.5% of the total) binding<br />

is taking place (as adjudged by absorbance<br />

25<br />

at 280 nm) which demonstrates a very<br />

good recovery of the product of interest.<br />

20<br />

Discussion<br />

The experiments demonstrate very efficient<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> µg/mL<br />

15<br />

10<br />

Filtrate<br />

Starting Solution<br />

removal of Calf Thymus <strong>DNA</strong> by Mustang Q<br />

5<br />

membrane in the presence of a bovine Ig G.<br />

This supports the fact that Mustang Q<br />

0<br />

membranes can be used for the efficient<br />

0 1 5 9 13 17 21 25<br />

removal of nucleic acids from both polyclonal<br />

Fraction<br />

and most probably monoclonal antibodies<br />

preparations to below both detectable and<br />

Figure 3: Results of <strong>DNA</strong> Challenge Test<br />

acceptable levels according to current<br />

FDA guidelines.<br />

5


<strong>DNA</strong> <strong>Clearance</strong> <strong>From</strong> <strong>Antibody</strong> <strong>Preparations</strong> <strong>Using</strong><br />

Mustang Q Membrane-Model Study<br />

<strong>Clearance</strong> of Nucleic Acid from a<br />

Monoclonal Cell Culture Supernatant<br />

The aim of this experiment was to demonstrate<br />

that a similar approach to the one described<br />

above could be applied to the use of<br />

Mustang Q membrane for <strong>DNA</strong> removal from<br />

a very complex solution such as cell culture<br />

supernatant.<br />

Protocols and Results<br />

A Monoclonal Cell Line was grown to a density<br />

of 1 x 10 6 cells per mL in RPMI 1640 media<br />

and the supernatant collected after<br />

centrifugation of the cells. This supernatant<br />

was pre-filtered to 0.2 µm using Supor ® media<br />

and then the pH was readjusted to 6.0 after<br />

addition of 50 mM Sodium Phosphate buffer<br />

pH 6.0. Supernatant (10 mL) was loaded on<br />

to a Mustang Q coin previously equilibrated<br />

with Sodium Phosphate buffer pH 6.0<br />

containing 150 mM NaCl at 10CV / min. The<br />

flow through was collected and assayed for<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> along with the starting material using the<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> hybridization method developed by Pall.<br />

During the experiment, absorbance at 280 nm<br />

(protein concentration) and conductivity (salt<br />

concentration) were continuously monitored<br />

as described in Figure 4.<br />

Absorbance (280nm)<br />

1.00<br />

0.90<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0.00<br />

-0.10<br />

Flow Through<br />

00:00:00 00:05:00 00:10:00 00:15:00 .<br />

Hr:Min:Sec<br />

Fractions<br />

Figure 4: Chromatogram of cell culture supernatant (10 mL) loaded on Mustang Q Coin<br />

Adsorption and washing buffer: Phosphate 25 mM pH 6.0 + 150 mM NaCl<br />

Elution buffer: gradient of 150 to 1000 mM NaCl in 40 CV of equilibration buffer<br />

Flow rate: 10 CV/min<br />

100.0<br />

90.0<br />

80.0<br />

70.0<br />

60.0<br />

50.0<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.00<br />

-10.0<br />

Conductivity (mS/cm)<br />

Discussion<br />

The experiment demonstrated that using the<br />

chosen conditions, Mustang Q membrane<br />

allows for the removal of <strong>DNA</strong> while the proteins<br />

of interest did not bind on the media. The<br />

hybridization test showed that while the initial<br />

level of contamination was 8 pg of <strong>DNA</strong>/ mL<br />

of cell culture supernatant, after passage<br />

through the Mustang Q coin this level was<br />

reduced to below detection level (2.5 pg/mL).<br />

These results demonstrate that Mustang Q<br />

membrane chromatography is a very suitable<br />

method for the removal of <strong>DNA</strong> from complex<br />

solutions, and can even be applied at early<br />

stages of the purification processes on crude<br />

protein solutions.<br />

Pre Mustang Media Flow ThroughFractions (Post Mustang media) Calibration Standards<br />

Figure 5: <strong>DNA</strong> Hybridization analysis cell culture supernatant loaded on Mustang Q Coin<br />

6


Conclusion<br />

We have demonstrated that anion exchange chromatography using<br />

membrane technology can be an excellent alternative to the use of<br />

conventional gel resins for nucleic acid removal as it allows removal of<br />

nucleic acids below the level requested by regulatory authorities.<br />

Membrane chromatography used in a disposable format significantly<br />

reduces the validation time as both column packing and cleaning validation<br />

will not be required. The pH and salt conditions at which the product of<br />

interest does not bind to the Mustang membrane, but the nucleic acids<br />

do bind, have to be determined in each case. Due to the very high<br />

negative charge of nucleic acid, this can be easily achieved with the vast<br />

majority of monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins produced<br />

by mammalian cell culture or any other sources.<br />

Nucleic acid removal was obtained at high flow rates, as typically flow<br />

rates from 10 to 20MV/min have been used, allowing clearance in minutes<br />

rather than in hours. In fact, Mustang Q membranes have a very high<br />

dynamic binding capacity (in the above conditions around<br />

18 mg of <strong>DNA</strong> were bound per mL of membrane) that is independent of<br />

flow rate due to their convective pores. Resins, on the other hand have<br />

dynamic binding capacities that are very flow rate dependent due to<br />

their numerous diffusive pores. The experiments performed at small<br />

scale suggests that for a typical antibody where the initial contamination<br />

level is around 5 µg/mL in the cell culture supernatant, a Kleenpak TM Nova<br />

10 inch (NP6) capsule could be used to clear 1000 L of cell culture<br />

supernatant in less then 2 hours. This high throughput technology is<br />

ideal for contaminant and impurities removal from biomolecules which<br />

are very susceptible to degradation.<br />

27


References<br />

(1) US FDA. Points to consider in the Production and Testing of New Drugs and Biologics Produced<br />

by Recombinant <strong>DNA</strong> Technology (1985)<br />

(2) Acceptability of all substrates from production of biologicals. Report of a WHO group.<br />

Technical report Series 757; World Health Organisation, Geneva (1987)<br />

(3) US FDA. Points to consider in the Characterization of Cell Lines used to Produce Biologicals.<br />

FDA, Rockville, MD (1993)<br />

(4) R.D. Sitrin, P. de Phillips, Challenges in developing commercial scale bioseparation and biopurification<br />

processes. International Biotechnology Expo Scientific Conference, Oct. 24, 1990. Oral Presentation<br />

(5) R.W. van Leen, J.G. Bachuis, R. van Beckhoven, H.Burger, L.C.J. Dorssers, R.W.J. Hommes,<br />

P.J. Lemsons; B. Noorclam, N.L/M. Persoon and G. Wagemaker, Production of human<br />

interleukin-3 using industrial microorganisms. Bio/Technology 9, 47-52 (1991)<br />

(6) STREAMLINE ® and Protein A Data file. Pharmacia Biotech Uppsala (1996)<br />

(7) A.L. van Wezel, P. van der Marel, C.P. van Beveren, I. Verma, P.L. Salk and J. Salk,<br />

Detection and elimination of cellular nucleic acids in biologicals produced on continuous cell lines.<br />

Dev. Biol.Standard. 50, 59-69 (1982)<br />

Technical Support<br />

Telephone: US Toll-Free (800) 859-3245<br />

International (1) 850 476 7974<br />

e-mail:<br />

web:<br />

mustang@pall.com<br />

www.pall.com/chromatography<br />

Pall has the most comprehensive<br />

family of scaleable separation products.<br />

2200 Northern Boulevard<br />

East Hills, New York 11548-1289<br />

800.717.7255 toll free<br />

+1 516.484.5400 phone<br />

+1 516.625.9548 fax<br />

pharmafilter@pall.com e-mail<br />

Visit us on the web at www.pall.com /biopharmaceutical<br />

Pall Corporation has offices and plants throughout the world in locations including:<br />

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India,<br />

Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands,<br />

New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Puerto Rico, Russia, Singapore, Spain, South Africa, Sweden,<br />

Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States and Venezuela.<br />

Distributors are located in all major industrial areas of the world.<br />

Europa House, Havant Street<br />

Portsmouth PO1 3PD, United Kingdom<br />

+44 (0)23 9230 3303 phone<br />

+44 (0)23 9230 2506 fax<br />

BioPharmUK@europe.pall.com e-mail<br />

,Pall Mustang, Kleenpak and Supor are trademarks of Pall Corporation.<br />

Filtration, Separation, Solution and UpScale are service marks of Pall Corporation.<br />

® indicates a Pall trademark registered in the USA.<br />

© Copyright 2004 Pall Europe Ltd.<br />

PELEH/04-E.SH/CS/10.2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!