13.01.2015 Views

Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats

Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats

Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

33<br />

Chairman BERMAN. In other words, essentially call the roll at<br />

2:15 and keep the roll open until 2:45. Is there any objection to<br />

that suggestion<br />

[No response.]<br />

Chairman BERMAN. Without objection, that will be the order, Mr.<br />

Henry Clay. You didn’t hear me, or I am doing something I am not<br />

allowed to do You are saying I am doing something I am not allowed<br />

to do. I am willing to take any embarrassment. Why don’t<br />

you tell us what you are thinking here<br />

Ms. RUSH. I would defer to the chief counsel, but I believe unless<br />

we spoke slowly for 1 ⁄2 hour to take the vote. I guess that would<br />

be okay, but we can’t——<br />

Chairman BERMAN. If I get unanimous consent to schedule a vote<br />

where the roll will be called in a regular order at 2:15, but that<br />

roll will not close until 2:45, there is something in the <strong>House</strong> rules<br />

that keeps me from doing that<br />

Ms. RUSH. Well, normally we would just——<br />

Chairman BERMAN. Let us leave that as the decision now. I have<br />

received unanimous consent to call the roll at 2:15 and keep that<br />

roll open until 2:45, and if I am advised that that is not the proper<br />

way to do it we will come back with another suggestion.<br />

Ms. RUSH. Okay.<br />

Chairman BERMAN. Okay. All right. The gentleman from South<br />

Carolina, Mr. Inglis, is recognized.<br />

Mr. INGLIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.<br />

Chairman BERMAN. Move to strike the last word. The gentleman<br />

is recognized for 5 minutes.<br />

Mr. INGLIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just would associate myself<br />

with the comments by Mr. Delahunt and Mr. McCaul. It is a<br />

very difficult question.<br />

If the atrocities were ongoing then it seems to me the United<br />

States would have an obligation to act, but these are historical<br />

facts and the current parties, which are different governments, are<br />

trying to work out that history and to come to some reconciliation.<br />

And so for us to enter that seems ill-advised because while I<br />

would agree with what has been said here, that we see the facts<br />

of the genocide, we see the horrors, and the United States has already<br />

spoken on this, to enter now and to potentially disrupt the<br />

process, the reconciliation process, I think is ill-advised.<br />

Also I think the thing that affects me is I have some information<br />

that it may in fact harm Armenians and so to have our entrance<br />

into this actually harm people who are trying to seek reconciliation<br />

now seems like not a terribly good way to proceed.<br />

All countries have to deal with their past, and we all have things<br />

that we must work through about our past. Several things about<br />

our past have been mentioned here—our treatment of Native<br />

Americans, our treatment of slaves in America. We are still dealing<br />

with the scourges of those sins, but to have other countries entering<br />

and trying to urge us along to award some resolution when in<br />

fact the resolution is going to come in the hearts of Americans and<br />

working through those things will take time.<br />

I think this is probably the same case with the Armenians and<br />

the Turks. So with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.<br />

VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:28 May 18, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 F:\WORK\FULL\030410M\55273 HFA PsN: SHIRL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!