Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats
Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats
Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
33<br />
Chairman BERMAN. In other words, essentially call the roll at<br />
2:15 and keep the roll open until 2:45. Is there any objection to<br />
that suggestion<br />
[No response.]<br />
Chairman BERMAN. Without objection, that will be the order, Mr.<br />
Henry Clay. You didn’t hear me, or I am doing something I am not<br />
allowed to do You are saying I am doing something I am not allowed<br />
to do. I am willing to take any embarrassment. Why don’t<br />
you tell us what you are thinking here<br />
Ms. RUSH. I would defer to the chief counsel, but I believe unless<br />
we spoke slowly for 1 ⁄2 hour to take the vote. I guess that would<br />
be okay, but we can’t——<br />
Chairman BERMAN. If I get unanimous consent to schedule a vote<br />
where the roll will be called in a regular order at 2:15, but that<br />
roll will not close until 2:45, there is something in the <strong>House</strong> rules<br />
that keeps me from doing that<br />
Ms. RUSH. Well, normally we would just——<br />
Chairman BERMAN. Let us leave that as the decision now. I have<br />
received unanimous consent to call the roll at 2:15 and keep that<br />
roll open until 2:45, and if I am advised that that is not the proper<br />
way to do it we will come back with another suggestion.<br />
Ms. RUSH. Okay.<br />
Chairman BERMAN. Okay. All right. The gentleman from South<br />
Carolina, Mr. Inglis, is recognized.<br />
Mr. INGLIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.<br />
Chairman BERMAN. Move to strike the last word. The gentleman<br />
is recognized for 5 minutes.<br />
Mr. INGLIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just would associate myself<br />
with the comments by Mr. Delahunt and Mr. McCaul. It is a<br />
very difficult question.<br />
If the atrocities were ongoing then it seems to me the United<br />
States would have an obligation to act, but these are historical<br />
facts and the current parties, which are different governments, are<br />
trying to work out that history and to come to some reconciliation.<br />
And so for us to enter that seems ill-advised because while I<br />
would agree with what has been said here, that we see the facts<br />
of the genocide, we see the horrors, and the United States has already<br />
spoken on this, to enter now and to potentially disrupt the<br />
process, the reconciliation process, I think is ill-advised.<br />
Also I think the thing that affects me is I have some information<br />
that it may in fact harm Armenians and so to have our entrance<br />
into this actually harm people who are trying to seek reconciliation<br />
now seems like not a terribly good way to proceed.<br />
All countries have to deal with their past, and we all have things<br />
that we must work through about our past. Several things about<br />
our past have been mentioned here—our treatment of Native<br />
Americans, our treatment of slaves in America. We are still dealing<br />
with the scourges of those sins, but to have other countries entering<br />
and trying to urge us along to award some resolution when in<br />
fact the resolution is going to come in the hearts of Americans and<br />
working through those things will take time.<br />
I think this is probably the same case with the Armenians and<br />
the Turks. So with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.<br />
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:28 May 18, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 F:\WORK\FULL\030410M\55273 HFA PsN: SHIRL