14.01.2015 Views

Does the inflation rate affect the performance of the stock market ...

Does the inflation rate affect the performance of the stock market ...

Does the inflation rate affect the performance of the stock market ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Emerging Markets Review<br />

Ž . 2 2001 263279<br />

<strong>Does</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> <strong>affect</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> The case<br />

<strong>of</strong> Egypt<br />

Mohammed Omran a , John Pointon b,<br />

a Arab Academy for Science and Technology and Maritime Transport, College <strong>of</strong> Management and<br />

Technology, Alexandria, Egypt<br />

b Uniersity <strong>of</strong> Plymouth Business School, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Deon PL4 8AA, UK<br />

Received 1 September 2000; received in revised form 10 April 2001; accepted 17 April 2001<br />

Abstract<br />

The intention <strong>of</strong> this paper is to examine <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> on <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Egyptian <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>. Particular attention is paid to <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> on various <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong> variables, in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>market</strong> activity<br />

and <strong>market</strong> liquidity. From <strong>the</strong> co-integration analysis through error correction mechanisms<br />

Ž ECM ., significant long-run and short-run relationships between <strong>the</strong> variables are found,<br />

implying that <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> has had an impact upon <strong>the</strong> Egyptian <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong><br />

<strong>performance</strong> generally. 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.<br />

JEL classifications: C12; C22; E44; G10; N25; O11<br />

Ž .<br />

Keywords: Inflation <strong>rate</strong>; Stock <strong>market</strong>; Egypt; Co-integration and error correction mechanism ECM<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Countries around <strong>the</strong> world have achieved significant reductions in <strong>the</strong> general<br />

<strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong>. For emerging economies, controlling <strong>inflation</strong> has been a high<br />

priority, and <strong>the</strong>re needs to be an evaluation <strong>of</strong> economic reform on emerging<br />

<br />

Corresponding author. Tel.: 44-1752-232-865; fax: 44-1752-232-493.<br />

Ž .<br />

E-mail address: john.pointon@pbs.plym.ac.uk J. Pointon .<br />

1566-014101$ - see front matter 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.<br />

Ž .<br />

PII: S 1 5 6 6 - 0 1 4 1 0 1 00020-6


264<br />

( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279<br />

<strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>s. This paper focuses upon Egypt as an important example <strong>of</strong> a<br />

successful economic experiment within <strong>the</strong> Middle East region. Since <strong>inflation</strong> has<br />

tended to have a negative impact on <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong>, such economic<br />

policies have benefited <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>s. Many academic investigations into <strong>the</strong><br />

impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> have concent<strong>rate</strong>d upon <strong>the</strong> effects on returns to investors. It<br />

should be mentioned that <strong>the</strong> <strong>market</strong> index in Egypt was established in late 1993.<br />

This means that to analyze statistically <strong>the</strong> impact on returns is not sensible for<br />

such a short period <strong>of</strong> time. However, o<strong>the</strong>r aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong>,<br />

such as <strong>market</strong> activity and liquidity have been neglected. Yet, it is particularly<br />

important for policy-makers to look at <strong>market</strong> activity and liquidity, since <strong>the</strong>se<br />

give indicators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>market</strong>’s attraction as a channel for investment and a source<br />

<strong>of</strong> finance for businesses<br />

When Egypt started its economic reform program by late 1990, <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

had been targeted to be under control in order to create an attractive environment<br />

for investment. With regard to this program, Egypt has witnessed major and radical<br />

changes in its economic climate. The aim <strong>of</strong> this program was to increase <strong>the</strong><br />

growth <strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy. This objective is not likely to be achieved without<br />

increasing <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> investment. In turn, this investment can be obtained through<br />

creating a strong <strong>stock</strong> exchange <strong>market</strong> that is capable <strong>of</strong> attracting local and<br />

foreign investment. In fact, it was vital for <strong>the</strong> Egyptian economy to depress <strong>the</strong><br />

high <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> in <strong>the</strong> first stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic reform program period. In<br />

turn, <strong>the</strong> government chose to restrict <strong>the</strong> demand for goods and services by<br />

putting <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> under control in <strong>the</strong> short-term, since <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r alternative,<br />

which represented an increase in <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong> goods and services, usually,<br />

needs a long time. In light <strong>of</strong> this, <strong>the</strong> Egyptian government introduced treasury<br />

bills in 1991 followed by treasury bonds Ž 510 years.<br />

in 1995. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>rate</strong>s <strong>of</strong> interest liberalized and real interest <strong>rate</strong>s became positive, and in turn, all<br />

<strong>the</strong>se procedures helped in absorbing <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> liquidity. As a conclusion, <strong>the</strong><br />

liquidity growth declined from over 27% in 19901991 to only 8.7% in 19971998<br />

Ž Central Bank <strong>of</strong> Egypt 1998 ..<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> decline in <strong>the</strong> budget deficit, combined with a relatively<br />

stable exchange <strong>rate</strong>, assisted in decreasing <strong>the</strong> <strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong>.<br />

This paper will focus upon examining <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> on <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> activity and liquidity in Egypt. In turn, we will consider previous<br />

empirical studies on <strong>inflation</strong> and <strong>stock</strong> prices and returns, <strong>the</strong> background<br />

literature, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>ses, and <strong>the</strong> data set and <strong>the</strong>n move on to set out <strong>the</strong><br />

methodology based on co-integration analysis. The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis will <strong>the</strong>n<br />

follow, before <strong>the</strong> summary and conclusions.<br />

2. Literature review<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> on <strong>the</strong> Egyptian <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> does not appear to have<br />

been <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> prior study. However, Omran and Pointon Ž 2000.<br />

examined <strong>the</strong><br />

cost <strong>of</strong> capital in Egypt based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 109 companies, although <strong>the</strong>ir


( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279 265<br />

investigation was a cross-sectional study, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a time series analysis. Also,<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir main focus was upon variations across industries. However, <strong>the</strong>y observed<br />

that, based upon an international comparison <strong>of</strong> 41 countries, Egypt has a very<br />

high cost <strong>of</strong> equity exceeded only by Peru, Pakistan and Columbia. They note that<br />

Egypt is a fairly new emerging <strong>market</strong>, despite its very early beginnings, so <strong>the</strong>re<br />

may be a high perceived risk, but that even <strong>the</strong> Treasury bill <strong>rate</strong> was high,<br />

approximately 9% in 1998. In turn, <strong>the</strong> treasury bill <strong>rate</strong> is likely to reflect to some<br />

extent <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>, in that investors demand maintaining <strong>the</strong>ir purchasing<br />

power. The experience <strong>of</strong> a high cost <strong>of</strong> capital suggests that <strong>inflation</strong>ary effects<br />

may have had an impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual firms.<br />

It is <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>of</strong> intrinsic importance to examine <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> on <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> in Egypt. The results have relevance to o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>market</strong>s, such as <strong>the</strong><br />

recent experience in Turkey.<br />

In <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>the</strong>re is a case to support <strong>the</strong> view that since <strong>the</strong> <strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong><br />

means an increase in <strong>the</strong> general level <strong>of</strong> prices, and since common <strong>stock</strong>s can be<br />

considered as capital goods, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> prices should move with <strong>the</strong> general<br />

level <strong>of</strong> prices. So, when <strong>the</strong> general <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> increases, common <strong>stock</strong>s should<br />

also increase to compensate investors for <strong>the</strong> decrease in <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> money. In<br />

this framework, it is expected that <strong>the</strong>re is a positive relationship between <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and <strong>stock</strong> prices. However, early empirical studies demonst<strong>rate</strong>d a<br />

negative relationship between <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and <strong>stock</strong> returns Žsee, Lintner,<br />

1975; Bodie, 1976; Jaffe and Mandelker, 1976; Nelson, 1976; Fama and Schwert,<br />

1977 .. In fact, <strong>the</strong> inverse relationship between a higher <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and lower<br />

common <strong>stock</strong> prices according to Feldstein Ž 1980a.<br />

results from basic features <strong>of</strong><br />

US tax laws, particularly, historic cost depreciation and <strong>the</strong> taxation <strong>of</strong> nominal<br />

capital gains. This is also reinforced by o<strong>the</strong>rs studies Žsee, e.g. Feldstein and<br />

Summers, 1979; Feldstein, 1980b, 1982; Summers, 1981a,b; Pindyck, 1984; Fama,<br />

1981 .. Dokko and Edelstein Ž 1987.<br />

examined this relationship in <strong>the</strong> US <strong>market</strong> by<br />

using <strong>the</strong> Mundell Ž 1963. wealth-effect hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, and <strong>the</strong> Darby Ž 1975.<br />

tax-effect<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis. The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir study indicated that a negative relationship exists<br />

between <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> expected <strong>inflation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> expected real <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> returns.<br />

Chen et al. Ž 1986.<br />

used monthly data for <strong>the</strong> period 19581984 to test <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> on <strong>stock</strong> prices. In fact, <strong>the</strong>y defined three variables related to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>: expected <strong>inflation</strong>; <strong>the</strong> change in expected <strong>inflation</strong>; and unanticipated<br />

<strong>inflation</strong>, and found a significantly negative relationship between <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> variables and <strong>stock</strong> prices. Similarly, Chen and Jordan Ž 1993.<br />

found <strong>the</strong><br />

same result for <strong>the</strong> same variables.<br />

Benderly and Zwick Ž 1985. and Titman and Warga Ž 1989 ., however, suggested<br />

<strong>the</strong>re exists a structural relationship between <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and <strong>stock</strong> returns<br />

arising from <strong>the</strong> real balance effect pertaining only to a period <strong>of</strong> adjustment<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than to a long-run equilibrium.<br />

In an Italian study, Bottazzil and Corradi Ž 1991.<br />

investigated <strong>the</strong> variability <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> risk premium in <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> over <strong>the</strong> period 19781989 and found that<br />

<strong>the</strong> acceleration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> is negatively related to <strong>stock</strong> prices. They<br />

added:


266<br />

( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279<br />

‘Since equities are claims against physical assets, whose returns are not <strong>affect</strong>ed by <strong>inflation</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

should be considered as an ideal hedge against <strong>inflation</strong>’.<br />

ŽBottazzil and Corradi Ž 1991 ., p. 338 ..<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, o<strong>the</strong>r empirical studies have examined this issue in <strong>the</strong> shortand<br />

long-term. For example, Boudoukh and Richardson Ž 1993.<br />

used annual data<br />

on <strong>inflation</strong>, <strong>stock</strong> returns and short- and long-term interest <strong>rate</strong>s over <strong>the</strong> period<br />

18021990. Covering both <strong>the</strong> UK and US <strong>market</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> data were obtained from<br />

Siegel Ž 1992. and Schwert Ž 1990 .. To look at <strong>the</strong> contemporaneous relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>, <strong>the</strong> study regressed 1-year <strong>stock</strong><br />

returns on <strong>the</strong> 1-year <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>, and 5-year <strong>stock</strong> returns on <strong>the</strong> 5-year <strong>inflation</strong><br />

<strong>rate</strong>. The results <strong>of</strong> this study revealed a negative relationship between <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and <strong>stock</strong> returns in <strong>the</strong> short-term, but in a long-horizon, this<br />

relationship tended to be positive.<br />

Again, Boudoukh et al. Ž 1994.<br />

investigated <strong>the</strong> cross-sectional relationship<br />

between expected <strong>inflation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> industry sorted <strong>stock</strong> returns. Using monthly<br />

data for <strong>the</strong> period 19531990, sorting <strong>the</strong> firms into 22 industry sectors and using<br />

regression analysis, <strong>the</strong>y found that <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> relationship between expected<br />

<strong>inflation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> industry group is linked to cyclical movements in industry output<br />

and, specifically, <strong>stock</strong> returns <strong>of</strong> cyclical industries co-vary negatively with expected<br />

<strong>inflation</strong>, while <strong>the</strong> non-cyclical industries co-vary positively. They also<br />

found a negative relationship for short horizons and a positive relationship for long<br />

horizons.<br />

In fact, all <strong>the</strong> above empirical studies focused on <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and <strong>stock</strong> returns and prices in <strong>the</strong> developed countries, especially<br />

<strong>the</strong> UK and <strong>the</strong> US. In turn, little is known about <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>s on a<br />

broader menu <strong>of</strong> countries.<br />

In this framework, Asprem Ž 1989. and Wasserfallen Ž 1989.<br />

explored <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />

between macroeconomic variables, and <strong>stock</strong> prices and asset portfolios in<br />

European countries. They found a negative relationship between <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

and <strong>stock</strong> prices. Also, Najand and Rahman Ž 1991.<br />

argued that <strong>the</strong> volatility <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> increases <strong>the</strong> volatility <strong>of</strong> <strong>stock</strong>s, thus in turn causing a higher required<br />

<strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> return on <strong>stock</strong>s, which means a fall in <strong>stock</strong> prices. Erb et al. Ž 1995.<br />

examined <strong>the</strong> interaction between <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and both <strong>the</strong> time-series and<br />

cross-section <strong>of</strong> expected <strong>stock</strong> returns in 41 developed and emerging equity<br />

<strong>market</strong>s. The result <strong>of</strong> this study confirmed <strong>the</strong> negative time-series relationship<br />

between realized <strong>inflation</strong> and realized asset returns when examined country-bycountry.<br />

The study found that <strong>the</strong> negative relationship is maintained when longer<br />

horizon returns are examined, o<strong>the</strong>rwise, when this study investigated <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />

between long-term <strong>inflation</strong> and long-horizon asset returns, it did not find a<br />

positive relationship between both variables. Hence, this suggested that international<br />

equity returns fail to serve as an <strong>inflation</strong> hedge, even if <strong>the</strong> equities are held<br />

over long horizons. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, on a country-by-country basis, equity returns do<br />

not serve as an <strong>inflation</strong> hedge. O<strong>the</strong>r studies, however, have indicated that <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and international <strong>stock</strong> returns tend to be


( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279 267<br />

positive in <strong>the</strong> long horizons ŽBoudoukh and Richardson, 1993; Boudoukh et al.,<br />

1994 ..<br />

However, from most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> empirical studies shown above, it can be concluded<br />

that, contrary to economic <strong>the</strong>ory and common sense, a significant negative<br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> <strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> and <strong>stock</strong> returns is found.<br />

It is important to observe that <strong>the</strong>se empirical studies have concent<strong>rate</strong>d mainly<br />

on <strong>stock</strong> prices and returns as indicators <strong>of</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong>. However, it<br />

can be argued that <strong>the</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> may also <strong>affect</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong>, such as <strong>market</strong> activity and <strong>market</strong> liquidity, in turn this<br />

paper will examine <strong>the</strong>se neglected aspects.<br />

3. Hypo<strong>the</strong>ses<br />

Five main <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> activity variables have been identified, namely, <strong>the</strong> value<br />

<strong>of</strong> trade, <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> trade, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> transactions, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> traded<br />

companies and <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> new issues Ž including capital increases .. Additionally,<br />

<strong>the</strong> total value traded to <strong>market</strong> capitalization and <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares traded to<br />

<strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares listed have been identified as referring to <strong>market</strong> liquidity.<br />

This leads to two main hypo<strong>the</strong>ses that can be formally stated.<br />

<br />

<br />

H1: <strong>the</strong> <strong>market</strong> activity increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases. The above<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis includes several sub-hypo<strong>the</strong>ses as follows:<br />

H11: <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases.<br />

H12: <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> trade increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases.<br />

H13: <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> transactions increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases.<br />

H14: <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> traded companies increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

decreases.<br />

H15: <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> new issues Ž including capital increases.<br />

increases as <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases.<br />

H2: <strong>the</strong> <strong>market</strong> liquidity increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases. The above<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis can, in turn, be divided into sub-hypo<strong>the</strong>ses as follows:<br />

H21: <strong>the</strong> total value traded to <strong>market</strong> capitalization increases as <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases.<br />

H22: <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares traded to <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares listed increases<br />

as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases.<br />

4. Data set<br />

The data <strong>of</strong> this paper cover <strong>the</strong> period from 19801981 to 19971998, which<br />

incorpo<strong>rate</strong>s time periods prior to and after <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

reform program. The Central Bank <strong>of</strong> Egypt, <strong>the</strong> Egyptian Cabinet Information


268<br />

( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279<br />

and Decision Support Center and <strong>the</strong> International Monetary Fund have been<br />

consulted as <strong>the</strong> sources for <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> data series. Egypt’s Capital Market<br />

Authority and <strong>the</strong> Central Bank <strong>of</strong> Egypt were <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se data. Because <strong>of</strong><br />

limitations in <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> data, annual figures are used in <strong>the</strong> analysis. This<br />

means that an important caveat to <strong>the</strong> results is that a longer period <strong>of</strong> study, or<br />

more frequent observations, may perhaps have provided different implications.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> importance here is to investigate broad <strong>inflation</strong>ary effects upon<br />

<strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> activity and liquidity. Never<strong>the</strong>less, although <strong>the</strong>se<br />

are arguably crucial to <strong>the</strong> smooth functioning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> results<br />

need to be considered within <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data set.<br />

5. Methodology: co-integration analysis<br />

In <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> time series data, both long-run and short-run relationships<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten co-exist. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> both long- and short-run effects can be modeled by<br />

introducing error correction mechanisms Ž ECMs.<br />

to enable a simultaneous evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> both processes Ž Banerjee et al., 1986; Engle and Granger, 1987 .. But first,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re should be a test for <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> integration Ž Dickey and Fuller, 1979 .. The<br />

basic approach is to run a simple linear model <strong>of</strong> values at time t regressed against<br />

values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same variable at time t 1. This is clearly an autoregression, since<br />

<strong>the</strong> variable is regressed upon its previous value. In <strong>the</strong> regression, if <strong>the</strong> coefficient<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variable at time t 1 is less than 1, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> variable at time t is said<br />

to be integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> order zero. The test is known as a unit root test. The predicted<br />

value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variable at time t, according to <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual value at time<br />

t 1 and <strong>the</strong> autoregressive coefficient, is likely to differ from its actual value.<br />

These error terms through time may be related, i.e. <strong>the</strong>re may be an autocorrelation<br />

in <strong>the</strong> error process. To help overcome this Dickey and Fuller Ž 1981.<br />

use a<br />

multiple regression, instead <strong>of</strong> a simple regression, containing extra components to<br />

represent changes in earlier values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variable for selected lags. These lags<br />

should be relatively small in order to save some degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom. The corresponding<br />

tests are known as augmented DickeyFuller Ž ADF.<br />

unit root tests.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> underlying variable is not integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> order zero <strong>the</strong>n a new model is set<br />

up that is based upon <strong>the</strong> same procedure, except that <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> variable from time t 1 to time t is regressed against <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong><br />

variable from t 2tot 1. This is known as first differencing. If <strong>the</strong> autoregressive<br />

coefficient is less than 1, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> variable is integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> order 1. The same<br />

process is repeated, if necessary, to test for higher orders <strong>of</strong> integration. In this way<br />

if <strong>the</strong> raw data are not stationary, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y are first differenced, or second<br />

differenced until stationarity is achieved.<br />

In this paper, <strong>the</strong> ADF unit root tests were performed to determine <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong><br />

integration for both <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and <strong>the</strong> chosen <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong><br />

variables using <strong>the</strong> Personal Computer Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimators<br />

Ž PCGIVE. Version 8.0 Ž Doornik and Hendry, 1994 .. Table 1 reveals <strong>the</strong><br />

results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root tests for <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> integration.


( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279 269<br />

Integrations <strong>of</strong> order zero were not found, and so <strong>the</strong> variables had to have a<br />

higher order <strong>of</strong> integration. On first-differencing, it was found that <strong>the</strong>y were each<br />

integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> order one.<br />

The capital <strong>market</strong> variables were first log-transformed to help linearize <strong>the</strong><br />

data. For <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> traded companies and <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> new issues Žincluding<br />

capital increases.<br />

a lag <strong>of</strong> 1 year was used in <strong>the</strong> multiple regressions. The ADF<br />

statistic, for <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> transactions was significant at <strong>the</strong> 5% level. The<br />

remaining variables were significant at <strong>the</strong> 1% level.<br />

As to <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>, <strong>the</strong> raw data were used without a log transformation.<br />

Again, <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> integration was one, with an ADF statistic significant at <strong>the</strong> 1%<br />

level.<br />

The next step was to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> variables, that were integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> same order, exhibited a co-integrating relationship. This means that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

cannot drift too far apart through time Ž Dickey et al., 1991 .. For example, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> was found to have <strong>the</strong> same order <strong>of</strong> integration as <strong>the</strong> log-value <strong>of</strong><br />

each <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> variable. Thus, simple regressions can be performed. For<br />

example, <strong>the</strong> logarithm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade at time t is regressed against <strong>the</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> at time t. From this regression <strong>the</strong> residuals are saved. This means that<br />

differences between each actual observed logarithm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade and <strong>the</strong><br />

respective estimated logarithm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade Ž from <strong>the</strong> regression.<br />

are saved<br />

as a vector.<br />

The changes in <strong>the</strong> residuals between adjacent points in time are defined as <strong>the</strong><br />

error correction mechanism Ž ECM .. These changes are tested to determine <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

Table 1<br />

Augmented DickeyFuller unit root tests for <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> variables and <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

Selected Transformation Order <strong>of</strong> Selected ADF<br />

variable <strong>of</strong> variable integration lags statistic<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> trade Log One Zero 2.306<br />

Volume <strong>of</strong> trade Log One Zero<br />

<br />

2.89<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Log One Zero<br />

<br />

2.12<br />

transactions<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Log One One<br />

<br />

3.176<br />

traded<br />

companies<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> new Log One One<br />

<br />

2.967<br />

issues Žincluding<br />

capital increases.<br />

Total value traded Log One Zero<br />

<br />

3.89<br />

to <strong>market</strong><br />

capitalization<br />

Volume <strong>of</strong> shares Log One Zero<br />

<br />

2.80<br />

traded to volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> shares listed<br />

Inflation <strong>rate</strong> None One Zero<br />

<br />

3.285<br />

<br />

denotes critical at 5%, denotes critical at 1%.


270<br />

( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279<br />

order <strong>of</strong> integration using <strong>the</strong> same procedure as earlier ŽCharemza and Deadman,<br />

1992 .. If <strong>the</strong> ECM is integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> order zero, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> variables are co-integ<strong>rate</strong>d<br />

Ž Engle and Granger, 1991 .. Conversely, <strong>the</strong> Granger Representation Theorem<br />

points out that co-integ<strong>rate</strong>d variables must have an error correction representation<br />

Ž Engle and Granger, 1987 .. But changes in <strong>the</strong> dependent variable can also<br />

reflect disequilibria between <strong>the</strong> dependent and independent variables ŽDolado et<br />

al., 1990 ..<br />

Therefore, given a stationary residual in <strong>the</strong> long-run static equation, <strong>the</strong> next<br />

stage is to regress <strong>the</strong> difference in, say, <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade from<br />

t 1 to t against: <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade from t 2 to t 1, and<br />

similarly for earlier lags; as well as <strong>the</strong> difference in <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> from t 1to<br />

t, and similarly for earlier lags; and also <strong>the</strong> error correction mechanism at time<br />

t 1 Ž see, for example, Thomas, 1997 .. The result is a first-differenced autoregressive<br />

distributed lag model with an error correction mechanism.<br />

A simplification search is carried out in a systematic manner involving <strong>the</strong><br />

gradual elimination <strong>of</strong> apparently unimportant lagged variables. To reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

general model, a two-tailed t-test with a 10% level <strong>of</strong> significance will be used to<br />

eliminate non-significant variables until no fur<strong>the</strong>r reductions are feasible. Strictly,<br />

general-to-specific models will be reduced using <strong>the</strong> criteria shown above, up to <strong>the</strong><br />

point where <strong>the</strong> right-hand side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EC model contains at least one differenced<br />

independent variable Ž for <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>.<br />

and <strong>the</strong> lagged ECM, which represents<br />

<strong>the</strong> basic form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EC model. For each bivariate relationship, once <strong>the</strong> final<br />

version from EC models have been specified, various diagnostic tests are run in<br />

order to test for <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> models Ž see Appendix A ..<br />

6. Results and analysis<br />

6.1. Modeling <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> upon <strong>market</strong> actiity through error<br />

correction models<br />

The ADF unit root tests indicated that <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and all <strong>market</strong> activity<br />

variables have <strong>the</strong> same order <strong>of</strong> integration, that is, <strong>the</strong>se variables are integ<strong>rate</strong>d<br />

<strong>of</strong> order 1. In turn, static long-run regressions have been performed using ordinary<br />

least squares Ž OLS.<br />

to test for co-integration relationships between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

The outputs <strong>of</strong> this analysis are given in Table 2, which summarizes <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong><br />

this test.<br />

The results from ADF unit root tests upon <strong>the</strong> residuals, from each bivariate<br />

static long-run equation given in Table 2, indicated clearly that <strong>the</strong> residuals from<br />

<strong>the</strong> five static long-run equations are integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> order zero, suggesting that <strong>the</strong><br />

variables in each bivariate relationship are co-integ<strong>rate</strong>d, that is, <strong>the</strong>re is a long-run<br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong>se variables. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> long-run relationships<br />

between <strong>the</strong>se <strong>market</strong> activity variables and <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> are negative. However,<br />

since ADF unit root tests have a low power, EC models can support or refute<br />

<strong>the</strong> co-integration relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables explaining both long- and


( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279 271<br />

Table 2<br />

Static long-run models for <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> upon <strong>market</strong> activity variables<br />

2<br />

Variables Coefficient S.E. t-Prob. F-Prob. R<br />

y1,t<br />

Constant 9.8830 0.74919 0.0000<br />

Inflation 23.747 3.7568 0.0000 0.0000 0.7140<br />

y2,t<br />

Constant 5.7633 0.44887 0.0000<br />

Inflation 17.842 2.2508 0.0000 0.0000 0.797<br />

y3,t<br />

Constant 13.968 0.70823 0.0000<br />

Inflation 25.161 3.5514 0.0000 0.0000 0.7583<br />

y4,t<br />

Constant 6.3300 0.33344 0.0000<br />

Inflation 7.3525 1.6720 0.0004 0.0004 0.547<br />

y5,t<br />

Constant 10.395 0.45794 0.0000<br />

Inflation 20.228 2.2963 0.0000 0.0000 0.829<br />

Notes: y1 value <strong>of</strong> trade; y2 volume <strong>of</strong> trade; y3 number <strong>of</strong> transactions; y4 number <strong>of</strong><br />

traded companies; y value <strong>of</strong> new issues Ž including capital increases ..<br />

5<br />

short-run relationships simultaneously. With regard again to <strong>the</strong> data series, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

indicated that <strong>the</strong>re is a slow response <strong>of</strong> most <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong> variables<br />

to <strong>the</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>, in turn both dependent and independent<br />

variables will be lagged up to 3 years in <strong>the</strong> EC models. Clearly, this may give more<br />

information about <strong>the</strong> best model, which can represent <strong>the</strong> best relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> variables. So, <strong>the</strong> chosen model has been decided, taking into<br />

consideration <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> F statistic, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> insignificant variables<br />

in <strong>the</strong> equation, mainly, ECM and <strong>the</strong> independent variable, <strong>the</strong> R 2 and also<br />

<strong>the</strong> degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom. The EC models, in turn, will explain both <strong>the</strong> long- and<br />

short-run relationship simultaneously, as <strong>the</strong> ECM coefficients are expected to<br />

capture <strong>the</strong> adjustments <strong>of</strong> differenced-dependent and independent variables towards<br />

long-run equilibrium, whereas <strong>the</strong> coefficients on differenced-dependent and<br />

independent variables are expected to capture <strong>the</strong> short-run dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

model. The results from <strong>the</strong> EC models can be seen in Table 3.<br />

As shown in Table 3, <strong>the</strong> selected <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> models, which treat <strong>market</strong><br />

activity as a dependent variable, contain significant ECMs without exception. The<br />

ECMs were significant at <strong>the</strong> 1% level for <strong>the</strong> first four variables: <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong><br />

trade; <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> trade; <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> transactions; and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> traded<br />

companies. The ECMs were significant at <strong>the</strong> 5% level for <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> new issues<br />

Ž including capital increases ..<br />

The <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship with <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade contains a<br />

significant ECM without a lag for <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and a lag <strong>of</strong> 1 and 3<br />

for <strong>the</strong> differenced autoregressive variable. With regard to <strong>the</strong> sign <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coefficients<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> independent variable from <strong>the</strong> static long-run equation given in Table<br />

3, it was found to be negative, suggesting that <strong>the</strong>re is a negative long-run<br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

without a lag was significant at <strong>the</strong> 10% level, suggesting a short-run relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> variables. In addition, <strong>the</strong> differenced value <strong>of</strong> trade with a lag <strong>of</strong> 1


272<br />

( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279<br />

and 3 years was significant at <strong>the</strong> 5 and <strong>the</strong> 10% level, respectively, implying that<br />

<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade may be <strong>affect</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> short run by its previous <strong>performance</strong>.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> ECM indicated a significant effect as well as <strong>the</strong> differenced independent<br />

variable, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, which stated that <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade increases as <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases, cannot be rejected, implying a negative long- and short-run<br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

With regard to <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship with <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong><br />

trade, <strong>the</strong> results showed that this model contains a significant ECM with a lagged<br />

differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1 and 3 years and a lagged differenced autoregressive<br />

variable <strong>of</strong> 1 year, that is confirming <strong>the</strong> co-integration relationship found in <strong>the</strong><br />

previous analysis. The lagged differenced-dependent variable for 1 year was significant<br />

at <strong>the</strong> 10% level, suggesting that <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> trade may be <strong>affect</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong><br />

short-run by its <strong>performance</strong> in <strong>the</strong> previous year. In addition, <strong>the</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Table 3<br />

Specific error correction models for <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> upon <strong>market</strong> activity variables<br />

Dependent Autoregressive Independent Error-correction R<br />

variable variables variables mechanism Ž F-prob. .<br />

Ž differenced. Ž differenced. Ž differenced.<br />

or constant<br />

<br />

Ž. Ž<br />

<br />

.<br />

<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> Value <strong>of</strong> Inflation t ECM t 1 66%<br />

trade Ž. t<br />

<br />

trade Ž t 1. Constant Ž 3% .<br />

2<br />

Value <strong>of</strong><br />

Ž . <br />

trade t 3<br />

Volume <strong>of</strong> Volume <strong>of</strong> Inflation Ž t 1. ECM Ž t 1. 57%<br />

trade Ž. t<br />

<br />

trade Ž t 1. <br />

Inflation Ž t 3. Ž 7.5% .<br />

<br />

Constant<br />

Ž<br />

<br />

. Ž<br />

<br />

.<br />

<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> Inflation t 1 ECM t 1 74%<br />

trans. Ž. t<br />

<br />

trans. Ž t 2. Inflation Ž t 3. Ž 3% .<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

trans. Ž t 3.<br />

Constant<br />

<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> Inflation Ž. t ECM Ž t 1. 82%<br />

traded traded<br />

<br />

Constant Ž 0.0% .<br />

cos. Ž. t cos. Ž t 1. <br />

<br />

Ž. Ž<br />

<br />

.<br />

<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> Value <strong>of</strong> new Inflation t ECM t 1 80%<br />

new<br />

<br />

issues Ž t 2. Constant Ž 0.0% .<br />

issues Ž. t<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> new<br />

issues Ž t 3. <br />

<br />

denotes 10% level <strong>of</strong> significance; denotes 5% level; and denotes 1% level.


( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279 273<br />

differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> lagged for 3 years was significant at <strong>the</strong> 10% level<br />

suggesting a short-run relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables. Since <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

showed a negative coefficient in <strong>the</strong> long-run static regression, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis,<br />

which stated that <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> trade increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases,<br />

cannot be rejected, that is, <strong>the</strong>re is a negative long-run and short-run relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

Concerning <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> transactions, <strong>the</strong> results showed that this model<br />

contains a significant ECM with a lagged differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1 and 3<br />

years, and a lagged autoregressive-dependent variable <strong>of</strong> 2 and 3 years. The<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differenced autoregressive variable lagged for 2 years was<br />

significant at <strong>the</strong> 10% level suggesting that <strong>the</strong>re is a short-run relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> transactions and <strong>the</strong> <strong>performance</strong> in <strong>the</strong> previous years. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> coefficients <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> with a lag <strong>of</strong> 1 and 3<br />

years were significant at <strong>the</strong> 10 and 5% level, respectively, suggesting a short-run<br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables. Since <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> showed a negative<br />

coefficient in <strong>the</strong> long-run static regression, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, which stated that <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> transactions increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases, cannot be rejected,<br />

implying a negative long- and short-run relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

The <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship with <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> traded companies<br />

contains a significant ECM with a lag <strong>of</strong> 1 year for <strong>the</strong> differenced autoregressive<br />

variable and a lag <strong>of</strong> zero for <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

model indicated that <strong>the</strong> autoregressive variable lagged for 1 year was significant at<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1% level, which means that <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> traded companies may be <strong>affect</strong>ed<br />

in <strong>the</strong> short-run by its <strong>performance</strong> in <strong>the</strong> previous year. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong><br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> without a lag indicated an insignificant<br />

effect, that is, <strong>the</strong>re is no short-run relationship with <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> traded<br />

companies. Since <strong>the</strong> coefficient from <strong>the</strong> static long-run equation showed a<br />

negative sign, in this case, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, which stated that <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> traded<br />

companies increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases, cannot be rejected, indicating a<br />

negative long-run relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

Lastly, <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> model, which incorpo<strong>rate</strong>s <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> new issues<br />

Ž including capital increases.<br />

indicated a significant ECM with a lag <strong>of</strong> 2 and 3 for<br />

<strong>the</strong> differenced autoregressive variable and without a lag for <strong>the</strong> differenced<br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>. However, <strong>the</strong> model indicated that <strong>the</strong> differenced autoregressive<br />

variable lagged for 2 and 3 years was significant at <strong>the</strong> 10 and 5% level, respectively,<br />

which means that <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> new issues Ž including capital increases.<br />

may<br />

be <strong>affect</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> short-run by its <strong>performance</strong> in <strong>the</strong> previous years. In <strong>the</strong><br />

meantime, <strong>the</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> without a lag was<br />

significant at <strong>the</strong> 10% level, implying a short-run relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

In addition, <strong>the</strong> coefficient from <strong>the</strong> static long-run equation indicated a<br />

negative sign, which means that <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables is negative.<br />

In turn, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, which stated that value <strong>of</strong> new issues Žincluding capital<br />

increases.<br />

increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases, cannot be rejected, indicating a<br />

negative long- and short-run relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables.


274<br />

( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279<br />

In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> results indicated that <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> has a significant<br />

impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>market</strong> activity in Egypt as all <strong>the</strong> five variables indicated a<br />

significant negative long-run relationship. As well, <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> seems to have<br />

a significant short-run relationship with all <strong>market</strong> activity variables except for <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> traded companies. In all cases, <strong>the</strong> overall fit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selected <strong>inflation</strong><br />

<strong>rate</strong> models <strong>of</strong> <strong>market</strong> activity was good with R 2 ranging from 0.57 to 0.82.<br />

Therefore, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, which stated that <strong>the</strong> <strong>market</strong> activity increases as <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases, cannot be rejected, implying a negative relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

6.2. Modeling <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> upon <strong>market</strong> liquidity through error<br />

correction models<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> results from <strong>the</strong> ADF unit root tests indicated that <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

and <strong>the</strong> <strong>market</strong> liquidity variables were shown to be integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same order,<br />

that is, <strong>the</strong>se variables are integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> order 1, static long-run regressions were<br />

performed using ordinary least squares Ž OLS .. The outputs <strong>of</strong> this analysis are<br />

given in Table 4, which summarizes <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this test.<br />

The residuals from <strong>the</strong> static long-run equations as described in Table 4 were<br />

integ<strong>rate</strong>d <strong>of</strong> order zero, suggesting that <strong>the</strong> variables in each bivariate relationship<br />

are co-integ<strong>rate</strong>d, that is, <strong>the</strong>re is a long-run relationship between <strong>the</strong>se variables,<br />

which is negative as identified in <strong>the</strong> regressions. However, EC models can<br />

represent <strong>the</strong> co-integration relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables explaining both a<br />

long- and short-run relationship simultaneously. Table 5 shows <strong>the</strong> final model for<br />

each lag.<br />

The <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> models, which targeted <strong>market</strong> liquidity as <strong>the</strong> dependent<br />

variable, contain significant ECMs at <strong>the</strong> 1% level.<br />

The <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship with <strong>the</strong> total value traded to <strong>market</strong><br />

capitalization confirmed a co-integration relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables as <strong>the</strong><br />

ECM was significant with a lag <strong>of</strong> 1 for <strong>the</strong> differenced autoregressive variable and<br />

a lag <strong>of</strong> 3 for <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>. However, <strong>the</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Table 4<br />

Static long-run models for <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> upon <strong>market</strong> liquidity variables<br />

2<br />

Variables Coefficient S.E. t-Prob. F-Prob. R<br />

y Constant 1.4716 0.36802 0.0010<br />

6,t<br />

Inflation 7.7040 1.8454 0.0007 0.0007 0.52<br />

y Constant 1.6273 0.20597 0.0000<br />

7,t<br />

Inflation 8.8736 1.0328 0.0000 0.0000 0.822<br />

Notes: y total value traded to <strong>market</strong> capitalization; and y volume <strong>of</strong> shares traded to volume<br />

6 7<br />

<strong>of</strong> shares listed.


( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279 275<br />

Table 5<br />

Specific error correction models for <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> upon <strong>market</strong> liquidity variables<br />

Dependent Autoregressive Independent Error R<br />

variable variables variables correction Ž F-prob. .<br />

Ž differenced. Ž differenced. Ž differenced.<br />

mechanism<br />

<br />

<br />

Ž . Ž .<br />

Total value Total value Inflation t 3 ECM t 1 60%<br />

traded to traded to<br />

<br />

Constant Ž 2% .<br />

<strong>market</strong><br />

<strong>market</strong><br />

cap. Ž. t cap. Ž t 1. <br />

Ž<br />

<br />

. Ž<br />

<br />

.<br />

<br />

Volume <strong>of</strong> Volume <strong>of</strong> Inflation t 1 ECM t 1 83%<br />

shares traded shares traded Inflation Ž t 3. Ž 0.0% .<br />

to volume to volume<br />

<br />

Constant<br />

listed Ž. t listed Ž t 1. <br />

<br />

denotes 5% level <strong>of</strong> significance; denotes 1% level <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />

2<br />

differenced autoregressive variable lagged for 1 year was significant at <strong>the</strong> 5% level<br />

suggesting that <strong>the</strong> total value traded to <strong>market</strong> capitalization can be <strong>affect</strong>ed by its<br />

previous <strong>performance</strong> in <strong>the</strong> short-run. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> lagged for 3 years were significant as well at <strong>the</strong> 5% level.<br />

Hence, <strong>the</strong>re is a short-run relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables. As <strong>the</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> independent variable from <strong>the</strong> static long-run equation has a negative sign,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re is a negative relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables. In turn, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis,<br />

which stated that <strong>the</strong> total value traded to <strong>market</strong> capitalization increases as <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases, cannot be rejected, indicating a long- and short-run<br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

The <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares traded to <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares<br />

listed showed a significant ECM with a lag <strong>of</strong> 1 year for <strong>the</strong> differenced autoregressive<br />

variable and a lag <strong>of</strong> 1 and 3 years for <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>. However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differenced autoregressive variable lagged 1 year was significant<br />

at <strong>the</strong> 1% level, suggesting that <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares traded to <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong><br />

shares listed can be <strong>affect</strong>ed by previous <strong>performance</strong> in <strong>the</strong> short-run. In <strong>the</strong><br />

meantime, <strong>the</strong> coefficients <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differenced <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> lagged for 1 and 3 years<br />

were significant as well at <strong>the</strong> 5% level. Hence, <strong>the</strong>re is a short-run relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> variables. With regard to <strong>the</strong> sign <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> independent<br />

variable from <strong>the</strong> static long-run equation, it is found to be negative, suggesting a<br />

negative relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables. In turn, it can be concluded that <strong>the</strong><br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, which stated that <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares traded to <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares<br />

listed increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases, cannot be rejected, indicating a<br />

long- and short-run relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

It is noticeable that <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> R 2 was 0.60 and 0.83% for <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

models <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total value traded to <strong>market</strong> capitalization and <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares<br />

traded to <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> shares listed, respectively, reflecting a good fit for both


276<br />

( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279<br />

models. Since <strong>the</strong> two variables, which represent <strong>market</strong> liquidity were cointeg<strong>rate</strong>d<br />

with <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, which stated that <strong>the</strong> <strong>market</strong><br />

liquidity increases as <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreases, cannot be rejected, indicating a<br />

negative long-run relationship between <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

7. Summary and conclusions<br />

An examination has been made <strong>of</strong> short- and long-run relationships between <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and <strong>the</strong> <strong>performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Egyptian <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>, in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>market</strong> activity and liquidity. It needs to be pointed out that fairly complex<br />

econometric techniques have been applied to a very restricted data set. As such it<br />

would be advisable to place only a qualitative interpretation on <strong>the</strong> results, ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than to place confidence in, e.g. <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coefficients or <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> lags.<br />

With this in mind, <strong>the</strong> results indicated that <strong>the</strong>re is a negative relationship<br />

between <strong>inflation</strong> and <strong>market</strong> activity and liquidity. The results revealed an<br />

expected behavior for <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> decrease in <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong><br />

<strong>rate</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> results regarding overall <strong>performance</strong> seem to be consistent with <strong>the</strong><br />

literature review, which stated that <strong>the</strong>re is an inverse relationship between <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> and both <strong>stock</strong> returns and prices.<br />

However, it needs to be pointed out that <strong>the</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> this study is on <strong>market</strong><br />

activity and liquidity, not returns and prices. In fact, <strong>the</strong> news about <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> can depress or encourage <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>s. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Egypt, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong> decreased sharply after <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic reform<br />

program due to tight fiscal and monetary policy. The decrease in <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong><br />

may give a good sign to investors to invest in <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>, as it means that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re will be an expansion in <strong>the</strong> business sector, in turn, <strong>the</strong> returns <strong>of</strong> companies<br />

will increase. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, with a decrease in <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>, it is expected<br />

that interest <strong>rate</strong>s will decrease as well, and this will encourage investors to<br />

establish new firms and to find <strong>the</strong> required finance with less cost. As a conclusion,<br />

all <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> variables benefited significantly from <strong>the</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong><br />

<strong>rate</strong>.<br />

From this analysis shown above, it can be concluded that <strong>the</strong> <strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>,<br />

clearly, has had an impact upon <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>performance</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>market</strong><br />

activity and <strong>market</strong> liquidity. In fact, this relationship was negative and in <strong>the</strong> longand<br />

short-run for all <strong>market</strong> activity and <strong>market</strong> liquidity variables except for <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> traded companies, in which case this relationship was in <strong>the</strong> long-run<br />

only.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The authors would like to acknowledge helpful comments from Nick Wiseman,<br />

Paul Bishop, Jon Tucker, <strong>the</strong> editor and <strong>the</strong> anonymous referee.


( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279 277<br />

Appendix A. Diagnostic tests for <strong>the</strong> chosen EC model<br />

D.V. Right-hand Coefficient P-Value Diagnostic tests<br />

side variables<br />

<br />

y Cons 0.87297 0.0010 AR 0.08303 0.7806<br />

1,t<br />

y <br />

0.57236 0.0466 ARCH 0.02520 0.8783<br />

1,t1<br />

y <br />

0.42636 0.0835 Normality 0.26568 0.8756<br />

1,t3<br />

x <br />

11.003 0.0534 RESET 0.10933 0.7494<br />

1,t<br />

<br />

ECM-1 0.50837 0.0071<br />

<br />

y Cons 0.57825 0.0023 AR 1.3328 0.2816<br />

2,t<br />

y <br />

0.51337 0.0595 ARCH 0.17179 0.6909<br />

2,t1<br />

x 8.8720 0.1310 Normality 2.9563 0.2281<br />

1,t1<br />

x <br />

10.085 0.0475 RESET 1.7369 0.2240<br />

1,t3<br />

ECM-1 <br />

0.64436 0.0219<br />

<br />

y Cons 0.35656 0.1134 AR 0.27569 0.6158<br />

3,t<br />

y <br />

0.54023 0.0648 ARCH 0.066711 0.8048<br />

3,t2<br />

y 0.50614 0.1165 Normality 1.2548 0.5340<br />

3,t3<br />

x <br />

12.179 0.0937 RESET 2.4268 0.1632<br />

1,t1<br />

x <br />

1,t3 15.877 0.0350<br />

ECM-1 <br />

0.65750 0.0044<br />

<br />

y Cons 0.29625 0.0000 AR 0.005367 0.9451<br />

4,t<br />

y <br />

0.70230 0.0005 ARCH 3.697e 05 0.9953<br />

4,t1<br />

x 1.1663 0.3016 Normality 0.2843 0.8675<br />

1,t<br />

<br />

ECM 1 0.30157 0.0001 RESET 0.37992 0.5710<br />

<br />

y Cons 0.37160 0.0037 AR 0.90351 0.3697<br />

5,t<br />

y <br />

0.39786 0.0526 ARCH 1.4088 0.2740<br />

5,t2<br />

y <br />

0.50150 0.0197 Normality 0.067784 0.9676<br />

5,t3<br />

<br />

x 3.3942 0.0899 RESET 3.1565 0.1152<br />

1,t<br />

<br />

ECM-1 0.19476 0.0387<br />

<br />

y Cons 0.41978 0.0063 AR 0.89262 0.3694<br />

6,t<br />

y <br />

0.72641 0.0166 ARCH 0.00153770.9681<br />

6,t1<br />

x <br />

8.2057 0.0683 Normality 0.10688 0.9480<br />

1,t3<br />

<br />

ECM 1 0.86499 0.0043 RESET 0.51822 0.4899<br />

<br />

y <br />

1.2692 0.0003 ARCH 1.2869 0.2940<br />

7,t1<br />

x <br />

1.2692 0.0219 Normality 0.43934 0.8028<br />

1,t1<br />

x <br />

8.2434 0.0180 RESET 0.54136 0.4829<br />

1,t3<br />

ECM-1 <br />

1.4250 0.0041<br />

<br />

y7,t<br />

Cons 0.29473 0.0052 AR 1.1809 0.3088<br />

Notes: denotes 10% level <strong>of</strong> significance; denotes 5% level <strong>of</strong> significance; denotes 1%<br />

level <strong>of</strong> significance; D.V., Dependent Variable; AR, Autocorrelation; ARCH, Autoregressive Conditional<br />

Heteroscedasticity; and RESET, model mis-specification. y1 value <strong>of</strong> trade; y2 volume <strong>of</strong> trade;<br />

y number <strong>of</strong> transactions; y number <strong>of</strong> traded companies; y value <strong>of</strong> new issues Ž<br />

3 4 5<br />

including<br />

capital increases .; y6 total value traded to <strong>market</strong> capitalization; y7 volume <strong>of</strong> shares traded to<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> shares listed; and x1<br />

<strong>inflation</strong> <strong>rate</strong>.


278<br />

( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279<br />

References<br />

Asprem, M., 1989. Stock prices, asset portfolios and macroeconomic variables in ten European<br />

countries. J. Bank. Finance 13, 589612.<br />

Banerjee, A., Dolado, J.J., Hendry, D.F., Smith, G.W., 1986. Exploring equilibrium relationships in<br />

econometrics through static models: some Monte Carlo evidence. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 48,<br />

253277.<br />

Benderly, J., Zwick, B., 1985. Inflation, real balances, output, and real <strong>stock</strong> returns. Am. Econ. Rev. 75,<br />

11151123.<br />

Bodie, Z., 1976. Common <strong>stock</strong>s as a hedge against <strong>inflation</strong>. J. Finance 31, 459470.<br />

Bottazzil, L., Corradi, V., 1991. Analyzing <strong>the</strong> risk premium in <strong>the</strong> Italian <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>: ARCH-M<br />

models vs. non-parametric models. Appl. Econ. 23, 335341.<br />

Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M., 1993. Stock returns and <strong>inflation</strong>: a long-horizon perspective. Am. Econ.<br />

Rev. 83, 13461355.<br />

Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M., Whitelaw, R.F., 1994. Industry returns and Fisher effect. J. Finance 49,<br />

15951615.<br />

CBE Ž Central Bank <strong>of</strong> Egypt ., 19921998, Annual Economic Review, Various Issues Ž CBE, Cairo ..<br />

Chen, S., Jordan, B.D., 1993. Some empirical tests in <strong>the</strong> arbitrage pricing <strong>the</strong>ory; macrovariables versus<br />

derived factors. J. Bank. Finance 17, 6589.<br />

Chen, N., Roll, R., Ross, S.A., 1986. Economic force and <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>. J. Bus. 59, 383403.<br />

Charemza, W.W., Deadman, D.F., 1992. New Directions in Econometric Practice: General to Specific<br />

Modelling, Co-integration and Vector Autoregression. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Aldershot.<br />

Darby, M.R., 1975. The financial and tax effects <strong>of</strong> monetary policy on interest <strong>rate</strong>s. Econ. Esq. 85,<br />

266276.<br />

Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1979. Distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimators for autoregressive time series with a<br />

unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 427431.<br />

Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit<br />

root. Econometrica 49, 10571072.<br />

Dickey, D.A., Jansen, D.W., Thornton, D.L., 1991. A primer on cointegration with an application to<br />

money and income. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 73, 5878.<br />

Dokko, Y., Edelstein, R., 1987. The empirical interrelationships among <strong>the</strong> Mundell and Darby<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis and expected <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong> returns. Rev. Econ. Stat. 69, 161166.<br />

Dolado, J.J., Jenkison, T., Sosvilla-Rivero, S., 1990. Co-integration and unit roots. J. Econ. Surv. 4,<br />

249273.<br />

Doornik, J.A., Hendry, D.F., 1994. PcGive 8.0: An Interactive Econometric Modelling System. International<br />

Thomson Publishing, London.<br />

Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and<br />

testing. Econometrica 55, 251276.<br />

Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., 1991. Long Run Economic Relations: Readings in Co-integration. Oxford<br />

University Press, Oxford.<br />

Erb, C.B., Harvey, C.R., Viskanta, T.E., 1995. Inflation and world equity selection. Financ. Anal. J. 51,<br />

2842.<br />

Fama, E.F., 1981. Stock returns, real activity, <strong>inflation</strong>, and money. Am. Econ. Rev. 71, 545565.<br />

Fama, E.F., Schwert, G.W., 1977. Asset returns and <strong>inflation</strong>. J. Financ. Econ. 5, 115146.<br />

Feldstein, M., 1980a. Inflation and <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>s. Am. Econ. Rev. 70, 839847.<br />

Feldstein, M., 1980b. Inflation tax rules, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>. J. Monet. Econ. 6, 309331.<br />

Feldstein, M., 1982. Inflation and <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>: reply. Am. Econ. Rev. 72, 243246.<br />

Feldstein, M., Summers, L., 1979. Inflation and <strong>the</strong> taxation <strong>of</strong> capital income in <strong>the</strong> corpo<strong>rate</strong> sector.<br />

Natl. Tax J. 32, 445470.<br />

Jaffe, J.F., Mandelker, G., 1976. The Fisher effect for risky assets: an empirical investigation. J. Finance<br />

31, 447458.<br />

Lintner, J., 1975. Inflation and security returns. J. Finance 30, 259280.<br />

Mundell, R.A., 1963. Inflation and real interest. J. Polit. Econ. 71, 280283.


( )<br />

M. Omran, J. Pointon Emerging Markets Reiew 2 2001 263279 279<br />

Najand, M., Rahman, H., 1991. Stock <strong>market</strong> volatility and macroeconomic variables: international<br />

evidence. J. Multinatl. Financ. Manage. 1, 5156.<br />

Nelson, C.R., 1976. Inflation and <strong>rate</strong>s <strong>of</strong> return on common <strong>stock</strong>s. J. Finance 31, 471483.<br />

Omran, M. and J. Pointon, 2000, The determinants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> capital by industry within an emerging<br />

economy: evidence from Egypt, Economic Research Forum Annual Conference, Amman, Jordan,<br />

October.<br />

Pindyck, B.S., 1984. Risk, <strong>inflation</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>. Am. Econ. Rev. 74, 335351.<br />

Schwert, G.W., 1990. Indexes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States <strong>stock</strong> prices from 1802 to 1987. J. Bus. 63, 399426.<br />

Siegel, J.J., 1992. The real <strong>rate</strong> <strong>of</strong> interest from 18001990: a study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> US and UK. J. Monet. Econ.<br />

29, 227252.<br />

Summers, L., 1981a. Inflation, <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>, and owner-occupied housing. Am. Econ. Rev. 71 Ž. 2 ,<br />

429434.<br />

Summers, L., 1981b, Inflation, and <strong>the</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> corpo<strong>rate</strong> equities, National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Research, Working Paper No. 824, December.<br />

Thomas, R.L., 1997. Modern Econometrics: An Introduction. Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Essex.<br />

Titman, S., Warga, A., 1989. Stock returns as predictors <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>rate</strong>s and <strong>inflation</strong>. J. Financ.<br />

Quantit. Anal. 24, 4758.<br />

Wasserfallen, W., 1989. Macroeconomics news and <strong>the</strong> <strong>stock</strong> <strong>market</strong>. J. Banking Finance 13, 613626.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!