14.01.2015 Views

Continuum for Assessing Opinion/Argument Writing - The Reading ...

Continuum for Assessing Opinion/Argument Writing - The Reading ...

Continuum for Assessing Opinion/Argument Writing - The Reading ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Meaning/<br />

Significance<br />

or<br />

Purpose<br />

the writer is gesturing towards linking related in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> writer does not yet “unpack” pieces of evidence by showing how<br />

they are connected to each other, to a supporting reason, or to the overall<br />

claim.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> writer may use authorial asides (“That’s weird!”) <strong>The</strong> writer<br />

probably does this to respond to in<strong>for</strong>mation (digesting it) or to add<br />

thoughts into the in<strong>for</strong>mation or to relate to the reader, so these asides<br />

probably indicate that the writer is intending to do something valuable,<br />

but the actual asides used can often be distracting and tangential.<br />

• At points in the text, the writer will seem to have aimed to write with<br />

verve. This may result in the asides, previously mentioned, or in the use<br />

of descriptive details, action words, or direct-address to the reader (e.g.<br />

“I hope you agree with me!”) This use of craft elements may not, in fact,<br />

be especially effective (it often creates a breezy, conversational tone)<br />

but the ef<strong>for</strong>t to try to balance being in<strong>for</strong>mative, organized and also<br />

lively is an important step ahead.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> writer will elaborate on his or her supports more than at the<br />

previous level, attempting to use what he or she knows about writing<br />

craft (e.g. showing and not telling an anecdote).<br />

• When asked to write an opinion piece, the writer will often jump to a<br />

specific topic that they know intimately well - in in<strong>for</strong>mational writing<br />

the topic may become quite broad (“all about dogs”) whereas in opinion<br />

writing it often becomes quite specific and particular, either in topic or in<br />

reasons (“Dogs are wonderful... my dog Muffy this... my dog Muffy<br />

that...”).<br />

• As with the prior level, the writer’s stance is fairly black and white, with<br />

little nuance. “Skateboarding is the best sport ever!” or “Sharks are very<br />

dangerous and scary and do not touch one.”<br />

• Pieces at this level often have the feeling that the writer assumes the<br />

reader shares an enthusiasm <strong>for</strong> the same topic simply because they are<br />

reading it. In other words, the writer does not do much beyond possibly<br />

using a “hook” device in the introduction or a bit of reflection at the end<br />

to impart significance to the reader.<br />

• Writers at this level do have a more controlled sense of how ideas are<br />

clearer with reasons, though in opinion writing as compared to<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mational writing, the evidence to support reasons can ramble as the<br />

opinion often feels very exciting, layered, and hard to contain.<br />

K-8 <strong>Continuum</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Assessing</strong> <strong>Opinion</strong> <strong>Writing</strong> - TCRWP 2011<br />

Working Document - Do Not Duplicate, Do Not Distribute<br />

DRAFT<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!