12.11.2012 Views

1 PRESENT Andrina Collymore (Chair), Tina ... - Hounslow Homes

1 PRESENT Andrina Collymore (Chair), Tina ... - Hounslow Homes

1 PRESENT Andrina Collymore (Chair), Tina ... - Hounslow Homes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Minutes of a meeting of the HOUSING MANAGEMENT FORUM (WEST)<br />

held on Thursday 2 September 2011 at St Catherine’s House (Alf<br />

Chandler Suite), 2 Hanworth Road, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 5AB<br />

<strong>PRESENT</strong><br />

Tenant and Resident Representatives<br />

<strong>Andrina</strong> <strong>Collymore</strong> (<strong>Chair</strong>), <strong>Tina</strong> Howe, Sandy Graver, Rene Wootten, Sylvia<br />

Panton-Chapman, David Brown and Jane Hunter, Barry Salvat and Hazel<br />

Salvat<br />

<strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> Board Representatives<br />

Cllr Gillian Hutchison<br />

Link Councillor<br />

Cllr Liz Mammatt<br />

Officers in Attendance<br />

David Allum (Director of Corporate Services), Mark Tune (Head of Repairs,<br />

Maintenance, Engineering & Energy), Vincent Kamara (Housing Services<br />

Manager), Ray Noad (Estate Monitoring Officer), Davinder Sahans (Company<br />

Administration Assistant), Steve Dodson (LBH Revenue & Benefits) item 3<br />

only.<br />

1. Apologies for Absence<br />

Andy Lee, Julie Osmond and Jacky Rankine tendered their apologies.<br />

2. Minutes of the meeting of 7 June 2011<br />

The minutes of the meeting of 7 June 2011were agreed as a true and<br />

accurate record.<br />

Matters Arising<br />

Apologies for Absence<br />

Members noted the response in relation to non-attendance of members.<br />

The <strong>Chair</strong> quoted that ‘Members who miss more than 3 meetings without<br />

reasonable explanations to the <strong>Chair</strong> may have their membership<br />

terminated by the <strong>Chair</strong>. The <strong>Chair</strong> will then invite the nominating body to<br />

make a new nomination.’ Mr Allum clarified that any action taken was at the<br />

<strong>Chair</strong>’s discretion.<br />

Ms Howe felt that there was an issue about the management of non<br />

attendance and further requested attendance data for members for the past<br />

year.<br />

1


Environmental Improvements<br />

Cllr Mammatt noted that previous ongoing litter issues related to scheme 7<br />

(Bedfont Green/Fawns Manor Road steel palisade boundar fence and<br />

gate) had been resolved.<br />

Capital Monitoring and New Build Update<br />

Cllr Mammatt noted that casework (resident from Burlington Close)<br />

reported in September 2010 still remained unresolved.<br />

There was a short discussion on digital aerial works. It was claimed that<br />

some residents had opted out of the current digital scheme as it did not<br />

include multi room facility and had switched to another provider, namely<br />

Virgin Media. Mr Tune confirmed that the current infrastructure allowed<br />

residents to access Sky and Sky plus but not multi room facility. He noted<br />

that initial consultation had concluded that multi room facility was not<br />

popular amongst residents and therefore was not included in the works or<br />

costs. A question was asked about what action <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> would<br />

take if the demand for Sky multi rooms increased. Mr Tune explained that<br />

an upgrade to the system would require additional funding and in real terms<br />

a cost implication on households. He added that the installation of multi<br />

room on a block by block basis could be considered, if the demand was<br />

high.<br />

A question was asked about what was the maximum satellite dishes<br />

allowed per block as it was claimed that a property (Hatchett Road) may<br />

have been breaching regulations. Mr Tune confirmed that according to<br />

planning regulations it was two satellite dishes per block. It was agreed that<br />

although there was a presumption that aerial works were still in progress<br />

the matter would be investigated.<br />

2011/2012 Budget<br />

It was noted that residents continued to express dissatisfaction with the<br />

caretaking service standards in the West Area. It was suggested that Ms<br />

Holt (Caretaking Manager) be invited to the next meeting to address<br />

concerns raised by members of the Forum.<br />

Any other Business – Caretaking Inspection<br />

Mr and Mrs Salvat confirmed receipt of the caretaking walkabout findings<br />

undertaken in November 2010 however expressed that other caretaking<br />

issues raised were unanswered. Mr Kamara noted that he had received<br />

responses and would speak to Mr and Mrs Salvat outside of the meeting<br />

due to the nature of concerns.<br />

2


Revenue and Benefits Performance and Service Standards<br />

Cllr Hutchison noted that she had not received an information sheet about<br />

the changes in legislation with regards to welfare benefits. Ms Sahans<br />

reported that Ms Persad (LBH Revenue and Benefits) was currently<br />

working with Housing and Communications teams to ensure a consistent<br />

message to all the residents of the borough regarding the forthcoming<br />

changes to the benefits system was provided. Cllr Hutchison advised that<br />

in the meantime she would refer any welfare benefit queries directly to Ms<br />

Persad.<br />

Performance Information Report<br />

Ms Wootten was satisfied that a party planned in the block where she<br />

resided which she felt could cause nuisance did not take place. She<br />

suspected this was as a result of the anti social behaviour team's<br />

intervention but was thankful all the same.<br />

At the last meeting Ms Panton-Chapman was advised that an update<br />

regarding a possible void property would be provided b Mr Hamilton but<br />

the information would be limited due to confidentiality and data protection.<br />

Ms Panton-Chapman informed that she had received no communication as<br />

requested. Mr Kamara noted that he was advised that following the query,<br />

the tenancy/anti social behaviour team had made contact and gave an<br />

apology if this was not the case. He added that since the last meeting Ms<br />

Noel (Estate Manager) had suffered a stroke however her caseload was<br />

being managed amongst the team.<br />

Environmental Improvements/Competing Claims<br />

It was noted that scheme 4 (footpath and alleyway improvements at 56-70<br />

Dudley Road) had proved successful in prohibiting fly tipping. Mr Noad<br />

confirmed that the gerda lock had not yet been fitted.<br />

Ms Chapman reported that the removal of the slide (scheme 7) as agreed<br />

at the last meeting had not taken place. Ms Panton-Chapman noted that<br />

the slide had been in existence for over 30 years and now posed a danger<br />

under health and safety. It was noted that a revised scheme would be<br />

considered by the Forum under item 6.<br />

Any other business – District Heating replacement<br />

Ms Panton-Chapman requested an explanation as to why the works to<br />

replace the existing district heating at New Chapel Square had not yet<br />

started. Mr Tune noted that the report on the replacement of district heating<br />

(New Chapel Square and Southern Avenue) to LBH Cabinet had been<br />

further delayed and <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> were awaiting formal approval to<br />

commence the works. Mr Tune shared concerns raised at the forum<br />

especially undertaking work near to the winter months. It was noted that<br />

3


once approval was given a meeting to introduce the contractors to residents<br />

would be arranged.<br />

All other actions were noted as completed.<br />

Action: Ms Sahans to provide attendance details of members.<br />

Action: Mr Tune to liaise with Cllr Mammatt to address issues related<br />

to the Burlington Close resident.<br />

Action: Mr Tune to ensure satellite dishes on a property (Hatchett<br />

Road) is investigated to ensure there was no breach of<br />

regulations.<br />

Action: Ms Sahans to extend an invitation to Ms Holt (Caretaking<br />

Manager) to the next meeting.<br />

Action: Mr Kamara to update Ms Panton-Chapman on ‘void’ property.<br />

3. Revenue and Benefits Performance and Service Standards<br />

The report presents performance data based on July 2011 (figures for<br />

August were not yet available) and updates members on changes in<br />

legislation.<br />

Mr Dodson noted that overall performance for processing new claims (22.5<br />

days) and changes in circumstance (8 days) were on track however an<br />

increase in work received from directly from the Department of Work and<br />

Pensions (DWP) had slightly impacted processing times. It was explained<br />

that the new processing system had resulted in DWP sending in duplicate<br />

notifications. It was noted that Liberata had employed extra staff to deal<br />

with the additional workload.<br />

Call Centre<br />

Mr Dodson reported that performance continued to improve each month.<br />

Ms Howe requested information on how many residents in the Borough of<br />

<strong>Hounslow</strong> pay Council tax and how many households were on benefits.<br />

Changes in Legislation<br />

Mr Dodson advised that the change in shared room rate individuals aged<br />

25 to 35 would be introduced in January 2012 and all affected customers<br />

would be notified of the changes in writing. He added that from April 2012,<br />

there would be a further increase to non-dependent charges.<br />

4


On the issue of Universal Credit, the implementation date was April 2013<br />

for new claims however no further details about the implementation of the<br />

changes had been provided by the DWP.<br />

At the last meeting, members were informed about changes to under and<br />

over occupation rules for social housing. It was noted that the changes<br />

would be implemented in April 2013.<br />

Mr Dodson advised that the localisation of council tax benefit was still under<br />

consultation however the implementation date was still anticipated to be<br />

April 2013.<br />

As mentioned previously in matters arising, a working group had been<br />

established and it was hoped that an information sheet (including posters)<br />

would be ready by the end of November.<br />

The <strong>Chair</strong> thanked Mr Dodson for the report.<br />

Action: Ms Persad to provide information about the number of<br />

households paying Council tax and the number of households on<br />

benefits.<br />

4. Performance Information Report<br />

The dashboard presents key performance information for the period April to<br />

June 2011. It highlights where performance is outside of the target figure<br />

and an analysis and corrective action is given alongside the performance<br />

figures.<br />

Voids turnaround<br />

Ms Panton-Chapman was concerned that void turnaround performance had<br />

not improved since the last meeting. Mr Kamara explained that <strong>Hounslow</strong><br />

<strong>Homes</strong> was responsible for the repairs element and LBH for the allocations<br />

process. He highlighted that the average time taken to repair void<br />

properties was consistently within target (12.76 days, target 13 days).<br />

It was noted that Vanguard (external consultants) had been commissioned<br />

to undertake a systems thinking review on void performance and that LBH<br />

and <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> would work closely with the aim to significantly<br />

improve future performance.<br />

Cllr Mammatt asked whether tenants were recharged for any damages<br />

once a property became void. Mr Kamara confirmed tenants leaving<br />

properties in an unacceptable state were recharged however reclaiming the<br />

money often proved difficult especially in cases where no notice was given<br />

by the vacating tenant.<br />

5


Cllr Hutchison noted that she recently attended a Board shadowing<br />

exercise on the voids process. She noted that some of the properties were<br />

not left in a decent state and required substantial repairs. She as interested<br />

to learn what the cost of repairs to void properties was in the Borough.<br />

Communal repairs<br />

Cllr Mammatt queried whether the target time of 52 weeks allocated to jobs<br />

was correct. Mr Tune explained that very few jobs were allocated a 52<br />

week target and that the time allocation stopped the generation of letters<br />

(e.g. tenant feedback forms). Cllr Mammatt noted that a repair was logged<br />

four months ago and little progress had been made to resolve the matter.<br />

Ms Panton-Chapman claimed that there was a waiting list for garages at<br />

New Chapel Square even though many were empty.<br />

Action: Mr Tune to provide the Void maintenance spend at the next<br />

meeting.<br />

Action: Mr Tune to provide an update to Cllr Mammatt regarding case<br />

work.<br />

Action: Mr Kamara to confirm garage query on New Chapel Square.<br />

5. Environmental Improvements/Competing Claims Budget<br />

The report informed members of the budget and progress of environmental<br />

improvements submitted to the Forum.<br />

Mr Kamara noted that total forum commitment to date was £63,287 (project<br />

value £55,033, fees £8,255). He added that money available for allocation<br />

to new schemes was £19,713 and that schemes totalling £25,993 (project<br />

value £22,603, fees £3,390) was submitted for consideration.<br />

Members noted the contents of the report.<br />

6. Environmental Improvements/Competing Claims<br />

Members considered 3 environmental improvements/competing claims also<br />

discussed at a pre-forum.<br />

There was a declaration of interest from Ms Panton-Chapman in relation to<br />

scheme 1. It was noted that she was a resident on the estate. The <strong>Chair</strong><br />

permitted Ms Chapman to respond to questions about the ver<br />

she took no part in deciding the outcome.<br />

6


Members agreed the following recommendations:<br />

Scheme 1 – to take out existing slide and install a basket ball unit at 1-100<br />

New Chapel Square, Feltham, costing £11,100.00. It was noted that this<br />

scheme was deferred from the last meeting. Members further discussed the<br />

amended scheme (removal of granite mound and level and to install bow<br />

top fencing on the existing wall, safety EPDM rubber surface would be laid<br />

and 2 new pieces of equipment supplied, costing £20,500.00). Forum<br />

agreed that the existing play equipment (slide) was a potential health<br />

hazard and engaged in a discussion about the replacement play<br />

equipment. Mr Noad confirmed that since the last meeting residents<br />

(including those with young children) had been consulted and new play<br />

equipment (a roundabout) was identified for the safety surfaced area.<br />

Ms Panton-Chapman was concerned that she had been requested to<br />

undertake an informal consultation with residents and the request for a<br />

roundabout was not mentioned.<br />

Decision: Agreed to install a roundabout not the spring chicken or<br />

cockerel seesaw stipulated on page 22).<br />

Scheme 2 – To install a close boarded fence and gate at the back of the<br />

block to help improve security at Dickenson Road 27-32, Hanworth,<br />

costing £673.00.<br />

Decision: Agreed to be deducted from 2011/12 budget.<br />

Scheme 3 – to install 2 drop kerbs in front of block to improve footway<br />

access at Fern Grove, Feltham, costing £1426.39.<br />

Decision: Agreed to be deducted from 2011/12 budget.<br />

Forum thanked Ms Panton-Chapman and Ms Wootten for taking the time<br />

out to visit the schemes.<br />

7. Lottery Funds Information<br />

The report gave an update on the progress of lottery funded initiatives that<br />

involved <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> residents in <strong>Hounslow</strong> and any lottery funds<br />

available to <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> residents.<br />

Mr Allum noted that the report was requested at the last meeting of the<br />

Central Area Forum and suggested it be circulated to the other Forums.<br />

Members noted the contents of the report.<br />

7


8. Options Review Update (verbal)<br />

Mr Allum gave an update on LBH option review on the future management<br />

of the housing stock and noted the following:<br />

that on the 2 nd August 2011, the Cabinet took the decision that<br />

<strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> should be retained to manage and maintain LBH<br />

council housing for 5 years with the option to extend for a further 2<br />

years.<br />

that work on the negotiation of the management agreement was<br />

progressing well.<br />

that the deadline for an agreed Management Agreement was the end<br />

of October 2011.<br />

that a draft Tenant Protocol had been developed by HFTRA which will<br />

form part of the Management Agreement with LBH and <strong>Hounslow</strong><br />

<strong>Homes</strong>.<br />

9. Sheltered Review Update (verbal)<br />

Mr Allum provided a report on the progress of the Older Person’s Review and<br />

noted the following points:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

that the report on the Older Person’s Review to LBH Cabinet had been<br />

further delayed however a revised version would be considered at its<br />

meeting on 13 September 2011.<br />

that the report was accessible from the Council’s website.<br />

that Jill Gale (Director of Housing) was the lead officer for <strong>Hounslow</strong><br />

<strong>Homes</strong> a member of the project board.<br />

the proposal to decommission and close Loraine Road an verglades<br />

sheltered housing schemes subject to completion of formal consultation<br />

with tenants.<br />

that cuts in supporting people budget would have an impact on the way<br />

Sheltered Housing services were provided and funded.<br />

10. <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> Repairs Service – Systems Thinking Review<br />

(verbal)<br />

Mr Allum gave an update on the progress of the Repairs Systems Thinking<br />

Review and noted the following points:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

that a comprehensive systems thinking project with the assistance<br />

and support of Vanguard Consulting had been in place since May<br />

2011 to redesign the <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> Repairs Service.<br />

that a Core Team consisted of front line staff and operational<br />

managers had been working on the project to understand how the<br />

8


•<br />

current systems operated and to explore ways in which<br />

improvements could be made.<br />

that the systems thinking project was progressing well and a recent<br />

open event to staff proved very informative.<br />

Forum noted the importance of the using the System Thinking Review to<br />

address issues in relation to booked repairs and operatives not having the<br />

correct supplies/tools to fix the repair first time and missed appointments.<br />

11. Capital Investment Programme & New Build Update<br />

The report provides an update on the 2011/2012 Capital Programme and<br />

new build programmes. Mr Tune noted the following points:<br />

the total value of the 2011/12 capital programme was £27.9m and<br />

capital spend as at the end of period 3 was £2,308k.<br />

that some adjustments had been proposed to the 2011/12 budget<br />

including the removal of £500k district heating reserves. It was<br />

explained that the amount was removed as <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong><br />

waited for approval for the works from LBH.<br />

that the rate of aids and adaptation referrals from LBH had slowed<br />

and it was noted that although the drop in numbers could be<br />

temporary advice from the Occupational Team had been sought to<br />

deal with any potential backlog.<br />

that the future procurement arrangements were progressing well<br />

and resident panel members were being sought to partake in the<br />

tendering process.<br />

that Value for Money working group of leaseholders had agreed a<br />

definition and a mechanism for measuring value for money. It was<br />

noted that feedback of the outcomes of the Value for M y group<br />

would be presented at the next leaseholder open meeting.<br />

Mr Tune gave an update on the New Build Projects and noted the following:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Convent Way – all properties were occupied and the project would be<br />

removed from future reports.<br />

Beavers Lane – Stage 1 was completed and Stage 2 was progressing<br />

well.<br />

Heston Area – project was approved by LBH Cabinet on 21 June 2011<br />

and contract documents were being developed. It was noted that the<br />

additional subsidy was required as the original designs were not<br />

accepted by the Planners. Resident consultation was underway.<br />

Manor Lane – Moss Gardens demolition had been completed and draft<br />

legal agreements were being finalised. It was anticipated that United<br />

House (contractor) would start on site in November 2011.<br />

9


•<br />

Elmwood/Olaf Palme (LBH) – work was progressing well and it was<br />

anticipated that the target for early completion (November) would be<br />

met.<br />

Members noted the contents of the report.<br />

12. Any other Business<br />

Tenancy Agreement Review<br />

Mr Kamara noted that work to review the tenancy agreement was still in<br />

progress. A report would be submitted to Cabinet for approval and once<br />

approved a 6 week time frame was given to incorporate any legal<br />

changes. It was noted that the aim was to complete the work by March<br />

2012 in line with rent changes.<br />

Ms Hunter advised that the document was discussed at a HFTRA<br />

Executive meeting where there were 4 issues that remained unresolved. It<br />

was suggested that HFTRA had not endorsed the document until the<br />

issues had not been fully addressed.<br />

Cllr Hutchison asked whether the revised Tenancy Agreement would be<br />

enforceable. Mr Kamara acknowledged that in some cases enforcement<br />

was a challenge however tenants would be reminded that the Tenancy<br />

Agreement was a legal contract that should be adhered to.<br />

There was a short discussion about pets. A question was asked on how<br />

the Tenancy Agreement dealt with issues involving small reptiles as pets<br />

(e.g. small snakes, lizards etc). Mr Kamara thanked members for the<br />

comment and noted that this area would need to be revisited.<br />

Action: Mr Kamara to ensure that the 4 concerns were addressed and<br />

that the revised Tenancy Agreement was fully endorsed by HFTRA.<br />

Action: Mr Kamara to relook at the animals section in light of tenants<br />

having reptiles as pets.<br />

The meeting closed at 9.00pm.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!