1 PRESENT Andrina Collymore (Chair), Tina ... - Hounslow Homes
1 PRESENT Andrina Collymore (Chair), Tina ... - Hounslow Homes
1 PRESENT Andrina Collymore (Chair), Tina ... - Hounslow Homes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Minutes of a meeting of the HOUSING MANAGEMENT FORUM (WEST)<br />
held on Thursday 2 September 2011 at St Catherine’s House (Alf<br />
Chandler Suite), 2 Hanworth Road, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 5AB<br />
<strong>PRESENT</strong><br />
Tenant and Resident Representatives<br />
<strong>Andrina</strong> <strong>Collymore</strong> (<strong>Chair</strong>), <strong>Tina</strong> Howe, Sandy Graver, Rene Wootten, Sylvia<br />
Panton-Chapman, David Brown and Jane Hunter, Barry Salvat and Hazel<br />
Salvat<br />
<strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> Board Representatives<br />
Cllr Gillian Hutchison<br />
Link Councillor<br />
Cllr Liz Mammatt<br />
Officers in Attendance<br />
David Allum (Director of Corporate Services), Mark Tune (Head of Repairs,<br />
Maintenance, Engineering & Energy), Vincent Kamara (Housing Services<br />
Manager), Ray Noad (Estate Monitoring Officer), Davinder Sahans (Company<br />
Administration Assistant), Steve Dodson (LBH Revenue & Benefits) item 3<br />
only.<br />
1. Apologies for Absence<br />
Andy Lee, Julie Osmond and Jacky Rankine tendered their apologies.<br />
2. Minutes of the meeting of 7 June 2011<br />
The minutes of the meeting of 7 June 2011were agreed as a true and<br />
accurate record.<br />
Matters Arising<br />
Apologies for Absence<br />
Members noted the response in relation to non-attendance of members.<br />
The <strong>Chair</strong> quoted that ‘Members who miss more than 3 meetings without<br />
reasonable explanations to the <strong>Chair</strong> may have their membership<br />
terminated by the <strong>Chair</strong>. The <strong>Chair</strong> will then invite the nominating body to<br />
make a new nomination.’ Mr Allum clarified that any action taken was at the<br />
<strong>Chair</strong>’s discretion.<br />
Ms Howe felt that there was an issue about the management of non<br />
attendance and further requested attendance data for members for the past<br />
year.<br />
1
Environmental Improvements<br />
Cllr Mammatt noted that previous ongoing litter issues related to scheme 7<br />
(Bedfont Green/Fawns Manor Road steel palisade boundar fence and<br />
gate) had been resolved.<br />
Capital Monitoring and New Build Update<br />
Cllr Mammatt noted that casework (resident from Burlington Close)<br />
reported in September 2010 still remained unresolved.<br />
There was a short discussion on digital aerial works. It was claimed that<br />
some residents had opted out of the current digital scheme as it did not<br />
include multi room facility and had switched to another provider, namely<br />
Virgin Media. Mr Tune confirmed that the current infrastructure allowed<br />
residents to access Sky and Sky plus but not multi room facility. He noted<br />
that initial consultation had concluded that multi room facility was not<br />
popular amongst residents and therefore was not included in the works or<br />
costs. A question was asked about what action <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> would<br />
take if the demand for Sky multi rooms increased. Mr Tune explained that<br />
an upgrade to the system would require additional funding and in real terms<br />
a cost implication on households. He added that the installation of multi<br />
room on a block by block basis could be considered, if the demand was<br />
high.<br />
A question was asked about what was the maximum satellite dishes<br />
allowed per block as it was claimed that a property (Hatchett Road) may<br />
have been breaching regulations. Mr Tune confirmed that according to<br />
planning regulations it was two satellite dishes per block. It was agreed that<br />
although there was a presumption that aerial works were still in progress<br />
the matter would be investigated.<br />
2011/2012 Budget<br />
It was noted that residents continued to express dissatisfaction with the<br />
caretaking service standards in the West Area. It was suggested that Ms<br />
Holt (Caretaking Manager) be invited to the next meeting to address<br />
concerns raised by members of the Forum.<br />
Any other Business – Caretaking Inspection<br />
Mr and Mrs Salvat confirmed receipt of the caretaking walkabout findings<br />
undertaken in November 2010 however expressed that other caretaking<br />
issues raised were unanswered. Mr Kamara noted that he had received<br />
responses and would speak to Mr and Mrs Salvat outside of the meeting<br />
due to the nature of concerns.<br />
2
Revenue and Benefits Performance and Service Standards<br />
Cllr Hutchison noted that she had not received an information sheet about<br />
the changes in legislation with regards to welfare benefits. Ms Sahans<br />
reported that Ms Persad (LBH Revenue and Benefits) was currently<br />
working with Housing and Communications teams to ensure a consistent<br />
message to all the residents of the borough regarding the forthcoming<br />
changes to the benefits system was provided. Cllr Hutchison advised that<br />
in the meantime she would refer any welfare benefit queries directly to Ms<br />
Persad.<br />
Performance Information Report<br />
Ms Wootten was satisfied that a party planned in the block where she<br />
resided which she felt could cause nuisance did not take place. She<br />
suspected this was as a result of the anti social behaviour team's<br />
intervention but was thankful all the same.<br />
At the last meeting Ms Panton-Chapman was advised that an update<br />
regarding a possible void property would be provided b Mr Hamilton but<br />
the information would be limited due to confidentiality and data protection.<br />
Ms Panton-Chapman informed that she had received no communication as<br />
requested. Mr Kamara noted that he was advised that following the query,<br />
the tenancy/anti social behaviour team had made contact and gave an<br />
apology if this was not the case. He added that since the last meeting Ms<br />
Noel (Estate Manager) had suffered a stroke however her caseload was<br />
being managed amongst the team.<br />
Environmental Improvements/Competing Claims<br />
It was noted that scheme 4 (footpath and alleyway improvements at 56-70<br />
Dudley Road) had proved successful in prohibiting fly tipping. Mr Noad<br />
confirmed that the gerda lock had not yet been fitted.<br />
Ms Chapman reported that the removal of the slide (scheme 7) as agreed<br />
at the last meeting had not taken place. Ms Panton-Chapman noted that<br />
the slide had been in existence for over 30 years and now posed a danger<br />
under health and safety. It was noted that a revised scheme would be<br />
considered by the Forum under item 6.<br />
Any other business – District Heating replacement<br />
Ms Panton-Chapman requested an explanation as to why the works to<br />
replace the existing district heating at New Chapel Square had not yet<br />
started. Mr Tune noted that the report on the replacement of district heating<br />
(New Chapel Square and Southern Avenue) to LBH Cabinet had been<br />
further delayed and <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> were awaiting formal approval to<br />
commence the works. Mr Tune shared concerns raised at the forum<br />
especially undertaking work near to the winter months. It was noted that<br />
3
once approval was given a meeting to introduce the contractors to residents<br />
would be arranged.<br />
All other actions were noted as completed.<br />
Action: Ms Sahans to provide attendance details of members.<br />
Action: Mr Tune to liaise with Cllr Mammatt to address issues related<br />
to the Burlington Close resident.<br />
Action: Mr Tune to ensure satellite dishes on a property (Hatchett<br />
Road) is investigated to ensure there was no breach of<br />
regulations.<br />
Action: Ms Sahans to extend an invitation to Ms Holt (Caretaking<br />
Manager) to the next meeting.<br />
Action: Mr Kamara to update Ms Panton-Chapman on ‘void’ property.<br />
3. Revenue and Benefits Performance and Service Standards<br />
The report presents performance data based on July 2011 (figures for<br />
August were not yet available) and updates members on changes in<br />
legislation.<br />
Mr Dodson noted that overall performance for processing new claims (22.5<br />
days) and changes in circumstance (8 days) were on track however an<br />
increase in work received from directly from the Department of Work and<br />
Pensions (DWP) had slightly impacted processing times. It was explained<br />
that the new processing system had resulted in DWP sending in duplicate<br />
notifications. It was noted that Liberata had employed extra staff to deal<br />
with the additional workload.<br />
Call Centre<br />
Mr Dodson reported that performance continued to improve each month.<br />
Ms Howe requested information on how many residents in the Borough of<br />
<strong>Hounslow</strong> pay Council tax and how many households were on benefits.<br />
Changes in Legislation<br />
Mr Dodson advised that the change in shared room rate individuals aged<br />
25 to 35 would be introduced in January 2012 and all affected customers<br />
would be notified of the changes in writing. He added that from April 2012,<br />
there would be a further increase to non-dependent charges.<br />
4
On the issue of Universal Credit, the implementation date was April 2013<br />
for new claims however no further details about the implementation of the<br />
changes had been provided by the DWP.<br />
At the last meeting, members were informed about changes to under and<br />
over occupation rules for social housing. It was noted that the changes<br />
would be implemented in April 2013.<br />
Mr Dodson advised that the localisation of council tax benefit was still under<br />
consultation however the implementation date was still anticipated to be<br />
April 2013.<br />
As mentioned previously in matters arising, a working group had been<br />
established and it was hoped that an information sheet (including posters)<br />
would be ready by the end of November.<br />
The <strong>Chair</strong> thanked Mr Dodson for the report.<br />
Action: Ms Persad to provide information about the number of<br />
households paying Council tax and the number of households on<br />
benefits.<br />
4. Performance Information Report<br />
The dashboard presents key performance information for the period April to<br />
June 2011. It highlights where performance is outside of the target figure<br />
and an analysis and corrective action is given alongside the performance<br />
figures.<br />
Voids turnaround<br />
Ms Panton-Chapman was concerned that void turnaround performance had<br />
not improved since the last meeting. Mr Kamara explained that <strong>Hounslow</strong><br />
<strong>Homes</strong> was responsible for the repairs element and LBH for the allocations<br />
process. He highlighted that the average time taken to repair void<br />
properties was consistently within target (12.76 days, target 13 days).<br />
It was noted that Vanguard (external consultants) had been commissioned<br />
to undertake a systems thinking review on void performance and that LBH<br />
and <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> would work closely with the aim to significantly<br />
improve future performance.<br />
Cllr Mammatt asked whether tenants were recharged for any damages<br />
once a property became void. Mr Kamara confirmed tenants leaving<br />
properties in an unacceptable state were recharged however reclaiming the<br />
money often proved difficult especially in cases where no notice was given<br />
by the vacating tenant.<br />
5
Cllr Hutchison noted that she recently attended a Board shadowing<br />
exercise on the voids process. She noted that some of the properties were<br />
not left in a decent state and required substantial repairs. She as interested<br />
to learn what the cost of repairs to void properties was in the Borough.<br />
Communal repairs<br />
Cllr Mammatt queried whether the target time of 52 weeks allocated to jobs<br />
was correct. Mr Tune explained that very few jobs were allocated a 52<br />
week target and that the time allocation stopped the generation of letters<br />
(e.g. tenant feedback forms). Cllr Mammatt noted that a repair was logged<br />
four months ago and little progress had been made to resolve the matter.<br />
Ms Panton-Chapman claimed that there was a waiting list for garages at<br />
New Chapel Square even though many were empty.<br />
Action: Mr Tune to provide the Void maintenance spend at the next<br />
meeting.<br />
Action: Mr Tune to provide an update to Cllr Mammatt regarding case<br />
work.<br />
Action: Mr Kamara to confirm garage query on New Chapel Square.<br />
5. Environmental Improvements/Competing Claims Budget<br />
The report informed members of the budget and progress of environmental<br />
improvements submitted to the Forum.<br />
Mr Kamara noted that total forum commitment to date was £63,287 (project<br />
value £55,033, fees £8,255). He added that money available for allocation<br />
to new schemes was £19,713 and that schemes totalling £25,993 (project<br />
value £22,603, fees £3,390) was submitted for consideration.<br />
Members noted the contents of the report.<br />
6. Environmental Improvements/Competing Claims<br />
Members considered 3 environmental improvements/competing claims also<br />
discussed at a pre-forum.<br />
There was a declaration of interest from Ms Panton-Chapman in relation to<br />
scheme 1. It was noted that she was a resident on the estate. The <strong>Chair</strong><br />
permitted Ms Chapman to respond to questions about the ver<br />
she took no part in deciding the outcome.<br />
6
Members agreed the following recommendations:<br />
Scheme 1 – to take out existing slide and install a basket ball unit at 1-100<br />
New Chapel Square, Feltham, costing £11,100.00. It was noted that this<br />
scheme was deferred from the last meeting. Members further discussed the<br />
amended scheme (removal of granite mound and level and to install bow<br />
top fencing on the existing wall, safety EPDM rubber surface would be laid<br />
and 2 new pieces of equipment supplied, costing £20,500.00). Forum<br />
agreed that the existing play equipment (slide) was a potential health<br />
hazard and engaged in a discussion about the replacement play<br />
equipment. Mr Noad confirmed that since the last meeting residents<br />
(including those with young children) had been consulted and new play<br />
equipment (a roundabout) was identified for the safety surfaced area.<br />
Ms Panton-Chapman was concerned that she had been requested to<br />
undertake an informal consultation with residents and the request for a<br />
roundabout was not mentioned.<br />
Decision: Agreed to install a roundabout not the spring chicken or<br />
cockerel seesaw stipulated on page 22).<br />
Scheme 2 – To install a close boarded fence and gate at the back of the<br />
block to help improve security at Dickenson Road 27-32, Hanworth,<br />
costing £673.00.<br />
Decision: Agreed to be deducted from 2011/12 budget.<br />
Scheme 3 – to install 2 drop kerbs in front of block to improve footway<br />
access at Fern Grove, Feltham, costing £1426.39.<br />
Decision: Agreed to be deducted from 2011/12 budget.<br />
Forum thanked Ms Panton-Chapman and Ms Wootten for taking the time<br />
out to visit the schemes.<br />
7. Lottery Funds Information<br />
The report gave an update on the progress of lottery funded initiatives that<br />
involved <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> residents in <strong>Hounslow</strong> and any lottery funds<br />
available to <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> residents.<br />
Mr Allum noted that the report was requested at the last meeting of the<br />
Central Area Forum and suggested it be circulated to the other Forums.<br />
Members noted the contents of the report.<br />
7
8. Options Review Update (verbal)<br />
Mr Allum gave an update on LBH option review on the future management<br />
of the housing stock and noted the following:<br />
that on the 2 nd August 2011, the Cabinet took the decision that<br />
<strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> should be retained to manage and maintain LBH<br />
council housing for 5 years with the option to extend for a further 2<br />
years.<br />
that work on the negotiation of the management agreement was<br />
progressing well.<br />
that the deadline for an agreed Management Agreement was the end<br />
of October 2011.<br />
that a draft Tenant Protocol had been developed by HFTRA which will<br />
form part of the Management Agreement with LBH and <strong>Hounslow</strong><br />
<strong>Homes</strong>.<br />
9. Sheltered Review Update (verbal)<br />
Mr Allum provided a report on the progress of the Older Person’s Review and<br />
noted the following points:<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
that the report on the Older Person’s Review to LBH Cabinet had been<br />
further delayed however a revised version would be considered at its<br />
meeting on 13 September 2011.<br />
that the report was accessible from the Council’s website.<br />
that Jill Gale (Director of Housing) was the lead officer for <strong>Hounslow</strong><br />
<strong>Homes</strong> a member of the project board.<br />
the proposal to decommission and close Loraine Road an verglades<br />
sheltered housing schemes subject to completion of formal consultation<br />
with tenants.<br />
that cuts in supporting people budget would have an impact on the way<br />
Sheltered Housing services were provided and funded.<br />
10. <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> Repairs Service – Systems Thinking Review<br />
(verbal)<br />
Mr Allum gave an update on the progress of the Repairs Systems Thinking<br />
Review and noted the following points:<br />
•<br />
•<br />
that a comprehensive systems thinking project with the assistance<br />
and support of Vanguard Consulting had been in place since May<br />
2011 to redesign the <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> Repairs Service.<br />
that a Core Team consisted of front line staff and operational<br />
managers had been working on the project to understand how the<br />
8
•<br />
current systems operated and to explore ways in which<br />
improvements could be made.<br />
that the systems thinking project was progressing well and a recent<br />
open event to staff proved very informative.<br />
Forum noted the importance of the using the System Thinking Review to<br />
address issues in relation to booked repairs and operatives not having the<br />
correct supplies/tools to fix the repair first time and missed appointments.<br />
11. Capital Investment Programme & New Build Update<br />
The report provides an update on the 2011/2012 Capital Programme and<br />
new build programmes. Mr Tune noted the following points:<br />
the total value of the 2011/12 capital programme was £27.9m and<br />
capital spend as at the end of period 3 was £2,308k.<br />
that some adjustments had been proposed to the 2011/12 budget<br />
including the removal of £500k district heating reserves. It was<br />
explained that the amount was removed as <strong>Hounslow</strong> <strong>Homes</strong><br />
waited for approval for the works from LBH.<br />
that the rate of aids and adaptation referrals from LBH had slowed<br />
and it was noted that although the drop in numbers could be<br />
temporary advice from the Occupational Team had been sought to<br />
deal with any potential backlog.<br />
that the future procurement arrangements were progressing well<br />
and resident panel members were being sought to partake in the<br />
tendering process.<br />
that Value for Money working group of leaseholders had agreed a<br />
definition and a mechanism for measuring value for money. It was<br />
noted that feedback of the outcomes of the Value for M y group<br />
would be presented at the next leaseholder open meeting.<br />
Mr Tune gave an update on the New Build Projects and noted the following:<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Convent Way – all properties were occupied and the project would be<br />
removed from future reports.<br />
Beavers Lane – Stage 1 was completed and Stage 2 was progressing<br />
well.<br />
Heston Area – project was approved by LBH Cabinet on 21 June 2011<br />
and contract documents were being developed. It was noted that the<br />
additional subsidy was required as the original designs were not<br />
accepted by the Planners. Resident consultation was underway.<br />
Manor Lane – Moss Gardens demolition had been completed and draft<br />
legal agreements were being finalised. It was anticipated that United<br />
House (contractor) would start on site in November 2011.<br />
9
•<br />
Elmwood/Olaf Palme (LBH) – work was progressing well and it was<br />
anticipated that the target for early completion (November) would be<br />
met.<br />
Members noted the contents of the report.<br />
12. Any other Business<br />
Tenancy Agreement Review<br />
Mr Kamara noted that work to review the tenancy agreement was still in<br />
progress. A report would be submitted to Cabinet for approval and once<br />
approved a 6 week time frame was given to incorporate any legal<br />
changes. It was noted that the aim was to complete the work by March<br />
2012 in line with rent changes.<br />
Ms Hunter advised that the document was discussed at a HFTRA<br />
Executive meeting where there were 4 issues that remained unresolved. It<br />
was suggested that HFTRA had not endorsed the document until the<br />
issues had not been fully addressed.<br />
Cllr Hutchison asked whether the revised Tenancy Agreement would be<br />
enforceable. Mr Kamara acknowledged that in some cases enforcement<br />
was a challenge however tenants would be reminded that the Tenancy<br />
Agreement was a legal contract that should be adhered to.<br />
There was a short discussion about pets. A question was asked on how<br />
the Tenancy Agreement dealt with issues involving small reptiles as pets<br />
(e.g. small snakes, lizards etc). Mr Kamara thanked members for the<br />
comment and noted that this area would need to be revisited.<br />
Action: Mr Kamara to ensure that the 4 concerns were addressed and<br />
that the revised Tenancy Agreement was fully endorsed by HFTRA.<br />
Action: Mr Kamara to relook at the animals section in light of tenants<br />
having reptiles as pets.<br />
The meeting closed at 9.00pm.<br />
10