16.01.2015 Views

Paper - Initiative for Policy Dialogue

Paper - Initiative for Policy Dialogue

Paper - Initiative for Policy Dialogue

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36<br />

emphasize the East Asian lesson of abandoning failures quickly; of constantly reviewing<br />

and modifying policies, as emphasized by several contributions to this volume, including<br />

those of Ohno and Ohno and of Hanatani and Watanabe, and of Bailey, Lenihan and<br />

Singh who remark that the “key is to adapt and tailor policies holistically to (the) stage of<br />

development”. At the very least, the options <strong>for</strong> an African government wishing to take<br />

the route to the developmental state paradigm and undertake the necessary governance<br />

re<strong>for</strong>ms should be elaborated and put on the table.<br />

The promise and possibilities in Africa are indicated by Sen and te Velde who<br />

conclude that “our research shows that the creation and sustenance of effective statebusiness<br />

relations ….may have a stronger impact on economic growth in Sub-Saharan<br />

Africa than the conventional measures of governance re<strong>for</strong>m such as improvements in the<br />

rule of law and stronger anti-corruption measures that have been stressed in the literature<br />

and the policy debate.” This is very much in line with the case <strong>for</strong> a State that is “growthenhancing”<br />

and “trans<strong>for</strong>mative”.<br />

VII. Pro-Poor Growth and Human Capital<br />

Pro-Poor Growth and Human Capital<br />

A developmental state is concerned not just with promoting growth <strong>for</strong> its own sake,<br />

but because it can enhance the well-being of its citizens, especially the poor. The issue of<br />

pro-poor growth received more attention in the discussions of the Task Force than they<br />

do in this volume. These issues are to be further elaborated upon in the subsequent<br />

volume. For Africa, increases in agricultural productivity have to be a central element of<br />

poverty reduction. Employment is another key issue, particularly in urban areas. In this<br />

volume, the paper by Azizur Rahman Khan notes that employment generation is perhaps<br />

the most important characteristic of pro-poor growth. Analysis of labor markets in Africa<br />

is hindered by paucity and indifferent quality of data. Nonetheless certain broad trends<br />

are fairly clear. Self-employment in family and subsistence activities hides<br />

unemployment and low productivity in these activities means that the incidence of the<br />

working poor is very high in the region. The proportion of the employed who earn less<br />

than PPP$1 a day is 55 percent in Africa, compared with 34 percent in the region with the<br />

next highest proportion, South Asia, and a range of 3-12 percent in other developing<br />

regions.<br />

Whilst making employment in agriculture more productive and lucrative has to be an<br />

essential element of poverty-alleviating growth, it is unlikely that agriculture can provide<br />

reasonably high-productivity employment to perhaps even all the labor <strong>for</strong>ce already in<br />

the sector, let alone the additions to the labor <strong>for</strong>ce in the pipeline in the <strong>for</strong>eseeable<br />

future. This implies that reasonable progress in reducing poverty will require Africa to<br />

replicate what A.R. Khan labels as one of the most important lessons of East Asian<br />

development, viz. “rapid structural change leading to a transfer of labor from agriculture<br />

to industries and modern services by means of very high rates of growth of these sectors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!