16.01.2015 Views

Post-Simulation Evaluation

Post-Simulation Evaluation

Post-Simulation Evaluation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 weeks after<br />

fall clinical:<br />

The summer<br />

simulation<br />

practice<br />

increased my<br />

confidence<br />

level when<br />

caring for my<br />

patients in the<br />

first weeks of<br />

fall semester.


Immediately post scenario:<br />

The summer simulation practice will decrease my<br />

anxiety when returning to clinical this fall semester


2 weeks after<br />

fall clinical:<br />

The summer<br />

simulation<br />

practice<br />

decreased<br />

my anxiety<br />

level when<br />

returning to<br />

clinical this<br />

fall<br />

semester.


Students comments:<br />

! “ I enjoyed the mixed levels, it helped<br />

me to understand more about what I<br />

am going to be learning in the near<br />

future”<br />

! “Mixed levels is a great idea! Would<br />

even help during the semester”<br />

! “ I think they were very helpful; my<br />

only wish is that we could’ve had<br />

more simulations during break”


Extra Scenarios Offered:<br />

! Basic Assessment – Cardiac Patient<br />

6 students from Nursing II, III and IV attended.<br />

1) Demonstrate how to obtain a focused history of<br />

the cardiovascular (CV) system.<br />

2) Identify modifiable & non-modifiable risk factors.<br />

3) Demonstrates assessment findings in a patient<br />

with CV disease.<br />

4) Describe the nursing interventions for this<br />

patient.<br />

5) Describe the treatments and medications for this<br />

patient.


Basic Cardiac Assessment<br />

! Pre-Scenario <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

History 3.6<br />

Risk Factors 4.0<br />

Assessment 4.0<br />

Nursing Interventions 3.2<br />

Treatments & Meds 3.0<br />

! <strong>Post</strong>-Scenario <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

4.4<br />

4.8<br />

4.2<br />

4.4<br />

4.2<br />

Likert Scale of 1-5<br />

1= No confidence<br />

5=Feel very confident<br />

N =6


Fluid & Electrolytes / Dehydration<br />

! Pre-Scenario <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

Pathology 3.6<br />

Lab Values 3.3<br />

Assessment 3.6<br />

Nursing Interventions 3.7<br />

Treatments & Fluids 3.4<br />

! <strong>Post</strong>-Scenario <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

4.3<br />

4.5<br />

4.6<br />

4.6<br />

4.4<br />

N=10


Foreign Body Airway<br />

Obstruction<br />

! Pre-Scenario <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

Define FAO 3.3<br />

Identify methods and diagnosis of<br />

FAO 2.5<br />

Discuss teaching & discharge<br />

instructions 3.3<br />

Describe nursing interventions<br />

3.3<br />

Evaluate the patient’s response<br />

to nursing interventions and<br />

treatments 3.3<br />

! <strong>Post</strong>-Scenario <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

4.5<br />

4.5<br />

4.3<br />

4.5<br />

4.5<br />

N=4


<strong>Post</strong> Op Ileus<br />

! Pre-<strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

Assessment 3.7<br />

! <strong>Post</strong>-<strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

4.0<br />

Nursing & Medical Management<br />

3.4<br />

4.0<br />

Pathology 3.4<br />

Nursing Interventions 3.7<br />

Response to interventions 3.4<br />

Lab Values 3.4<br />

4.0<br />

4.0<br />

5.0<br />

5.0<br />

N = 3


Chemotherapy Patient<br />

! Pre-Scenario <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

Physical assessment/<br />

complications 1.0<br />

Pathology 1.5<br />

Assessment Findings 1.5<br />

Nursing Interventions 1.0<br />

Treatments 1.0<br />

Lab Values 1.0<br />

! <strong>Post</strong>-Scenario <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

3.5<br />

3.5<br />

4.0<br />

4.0<br />

4.0<br />

4.0<br />

N=2


All Scenario’s <strong>Post</strong> – <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

! Included these questions:<br />

5 point Likert scale utilized for analysis.<br />

1=Strongly disagree 5= Agree strongly<br />

I feel this simulation was beneficial.<br />

I feel the scenarios were realistic and applicable to<br />

my learning needs.<br />

I felt anxious during the simulation.<br />

I feel that my anxiety interfered with my learning.


Results<br />

! Fluid & Electrolytes/Dehydration<br />

All students identified that their anxiety was<br />

not an issue in this simulation 3.1/5.0 with 3<br />

being neither agree or disagree.<br />

They ranked scenario realism at 4.8/5.0<br />

They ranked the benefit that this scenario<br />

had on their learning at 4.8/5.0<br />

They ranked their anxiety as interfering with<br />

their learning as 2.3/5.0 with 2 = disagree<br />

with the statement and 5 = strongly agree .


Results


Results


Plans for the Future<br />

! Continue offering extra simulation<br />

scenarios during school year<br />

! Start a “Summer <strong>Simulation</strong> Camps”<br />

! NCLEX review with simulation for<br />

graduates prior to NCLEX exam<br />

! Reviewer camps as a refresher course for<br />

Alumni who are returning to nursing<br />

! Continue to collect data and publish<br />

research on effectiveness of simulation for<br />

student learning.


What do you think<br />

! What are your thoughts<br />

! Has anyone tried extra simulation<br />

scenarios<br />

! How is simulation being used in your<br />

curriculum<br />

! How can we evaluate the<br />

effectiveness of simulation in the<br />

learning process


References<br />

! National League for Nursing. (2004).<br />

Innovation in nursing education: A call<br />

to reform. New York: National League<br />

for Nursing.<br />

! Del Bueno, D. J. (2004). A crisis in<br />

critical thinking. Nursing Education<br />

Perspectives, 26 (5). 278-283.


References<br />

! Clarke, S.P., & Aiken, L.H. (2003).<br />

Failure to rescue: Needless deaths<br />

are prime examples of the need for<br />

nurses at the bedside. American<br />

Journal of Nursing. 103(1), 42-47.<br />

! Linden L.L., (2008) The Effect of<br />

Clinical <strong>Simulation</strong> and Traditional<br />

Teaching Versus Traditional Teaching<br />

Alone on Critical Thinking of Nursing<br />

Students. EdD thesis, College of<br />

Saint Mary, Omaha, NE.


References Continued<br />

! Kolb, D. A., (1984). Experiential<br />

learning: Experience as the source of<br />

learning and development. NJ:<br />

Prentice-Hall<br />

! Benner, P. (1984). From Novice to<br />

Expert Excellence and Power in<br />

Clinical Nursing Practice. Don Mills,<br />

Ontario: Addison-Wesley Publishing<br />

Company


References Continued<br />

! Jeffries, P.R. (Ed.) (2007). <strong>Simulation</strong><br />

in Nursing Education From<br />

Conceptualization to <strong>Evaluation</strong>. New<br />

York, New York. National League for<br />

Nursing<br />

! Cant R.P. & Cooper S.J. (2010)<br />

<strong>Simulation</strong>-based learning in nurse<br />

education: systematic review. Journal<br />

of Advanced Nursing 66(1), 3-15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!