18.01.2015 Views

author's proof - DARP

author's proof - DARP

author's proof - DARP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AUTHOR'S PROOF<br />

Reference distributions and inequality measurement<br />

JrnlID 10888_ArtID 9238_Proof# 1 - 08/01/13<br />

Q2<br />

Lemma 2 Given Axioms 1 to 6 ≽ is representable by φ<br />

( ∑n<br />

i=1 x ih i<br />

(<br />

xi<br />

y i<br />

))<br />

where h i is a 329<br />

real-valued function. 330<br />

Proof Using the function introduced in the <strong>proof</strong> of Lemma 1 Axiom 6 implies 331<br />

(z) = ( z ′) and (tz) = ( tz ′) ; since this has to be true for arbitrary z, z ′ we have 332<br />

(tz)<br />

(z) = ( tz ′)<br />

(z ′ ) = ψ (t)<br />

where ψ is a continuous function R → R. Hence,usingtheφ i given in Lemma 1 we 333<br />

have for all i : φ i (tz i ) = ψ (t) φ i (z i ) or, equivalently φ i (tx i , ty i ) = ψ (t) φ i (x i , y i ) . In 334<br />

view of Aczél and Dhombres [2], page 346 there must exist c ∈ R and a function 335<br />

h i : R + → R such that 336<br />

( )<br />

φ i (x i , y i ) = xi c h xi<br />

i . (14)<br />

y i<br />

From Lemma 1 and Eq. 14: φ i (x i , x i ) = xi ch i (1) = a i + b i x i , which, ifφ i (x, x) is non- 337<br />

constant in x, implies c = 1. Noting that Lemma 1 implies that ≽ is also representable 338<br />

by φ (∑ n<br />

i=1 φ i (z i ) ) (whereφ : R → R is continuous and monotonic increasing, and 339<br />

taking Eq. 14 with c = 1 gives the result. ⊓⊔ 340<br />

Theorem 1 Given Axioms 1 to 7 ≽ is representable by φ (∑ n<br />

)<br />

i=1 xα i y1−α i where α ̸= 1 341<br />

is a constant. 342<br />

Proof (Cf [21]) Take the special case where, in distribution z ′ 0<br />

the income discrep- 343<br />

ancy takes the same value r for all n income pairs. If (x i , y i ) represents a typical 344<br />

component in z 0 then z 0 ∼ z ′ 0<br />

implies 345<br />

( n∑ ( ) )<br />

xi<br />

r = ψ x i h i (15)<br />

y<br />

i=1 i<br />

where ψ is the solution in r to 346<br />

n∑<br />

( )<br />

xi<br />

n∑<br />

x i h i = x i h i (r) (16)<br />

y i<br />

UNCORRECTED PROOF<br />

i=1<br />

i=1<br />

In Eq. 16 we take the x i as fixed weights. Using Axiom 7 in Eq. 15 requires 347<br />

( n∑ (<br />

tr = ψ x i h i t x ) )<br />

i<br />

,forallt > 0. (17)<br />

y<br />

i=1<br />

i<br />

Using Eq. 16 we have 348<br />

(<br />

n∑<br />

n∑ ( )<br />

x i h i<br />

(tψ<br />

)) xi<br />

n∑<br />

(<br />

x i h i = x i h i t x )<br />

i<br />

(18)<br />

y<br />

i=1<br />

i=1 i y<br />

i=1<br />

i<br />

Introduce the following change of variables 349<br />

( )<br />

xi<br />

u i := x i h i , i = 1, ..., n (19)<br />

y i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!