Narrative Organization Skills of Children with ADHD - University at ...
Narrative Organization Skills of Children with ADHD - University at ...
Narrative Organization Skills of Children with ADHD - University at ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Goals<br />
<strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>Skills</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Children</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong><br />
Fei Luo, Geralyn Timler,& Dawn Vogler-<br />
Elias<br />
Child Language Labor<strong>at</strong>ory<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>at</strong> Buffalo<br />
To demonstr<strong>at</strong>e the narr<strong>at</strong>ive organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
skills <strong>of</strong> children <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong><br />
To introduce a new narr<strong>at</strong>ive analysis<br />
method<br />
<strong>ADHD</strong><br />
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder<br />
Developmentally inappropri<strong>at</strong>e levels <strong>of</strong><br />
in<strong>at</strong>tention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity<br />
(American Psychi<strong>at</strong>ric Associ<strong>at</strong>ion, 2000)<br />
<strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>s<br />
Story telling or retelling<br />
Important in daily social interaction and<br />
academic activities (Trabasso & Stein,<br />
1997)<br />
<strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Children</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong><br />
Story retellings were shorter (Zentall, 1988)<br />
and less organized (Tannock, Purvis, and<br />
Schachar, 1993)<br />
Had more sequence errors,<br />
misinterpret<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> the original stories,<br />
and word substitutions (Purvis & Tannock,<br />
1997)<br />
Problems<br />
Language st<strong>at</strong>us<br />
– High r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> comorbidity <strong>of</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> and<br />
language impairments (LI)<br />
35~50% <strong>of</strong> children <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> have concurrent<br />
language impairments<br />
R<strong>at</strong>es can be as high as 90% in studies using<br />
clinically referred samples<br />
(Baker & Cantwell, 1992; Beitchman et al., 2001;<br />
Tannock & Schachar, 1996)<br />
1
<strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion</strong><br />
Coherent narr<strong>at</strong>ives are usually organized<br />
by hierarchical goal structures (Trabasso<br />
& Nickels, 1992; Trabasso et al., 1992)<br />
Goal structure: a goal and its associ<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
<strong>at</strong>tempts and outcomes (GAO units)<br />
– Different levels <strong>of</strong> goals: superordin<strong>at</strong>e goals<br />
and subordin<strong>at</strong>e goals<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> Goal Structures<br />
(Trabasso & Nickels, 1992)<br />
3 and 4-year-olds begin to use goal<br />
structures (i.e., GAO units) to organize<br />
their narr<strong>at</strong>ives.<br />
9-year-olds produce as many complete<br />
GAO units as adults.<br />
– Complete GAO = goal + <strong>at</strong>tempt + outcome<br />
Causal Network Model<br />
(Trabasso, et al, 1989)<br />
Used to identify the GAO units in narr<strong>at</strong>ives<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> the GAO units is a more useful<br />
measure <strong>of</strong> narr<strong>at</strong>ive organiz<strong>at</strong>ion in children<br />
<strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> (Renz, et al., 2003).<br />
Research Question<br />
Do typical children, children <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong><br />
only, and children <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong>+LI differ in<br />
their narr<strong>at</strong>ive organiz<strong>at</strong>ion skills,<br />
specifically their use <strong>of</strong> hierarchical goal<br />
structures, indexed by GAO units<br />
Participants<br />
Means<br />
(SD)<br />
C.A. in<br />
months<br />
CELF-4<br />
Core<br />
Language<br />
Method<br />
Typical<br />
(n = 13)<br />
121 (15)<br />
114 (8)<br />
<strong>ADHD</strong><br />
Only<br />
(n = 7)<br />
126 (23)<br />
100 (16)<br />
<strong>ADHD</strong> +<br />
LI<br />
(n = 5)<br />
121 (12)<br />
76 (3)<br />
Method (Cont’d)<br />
Stimuli<br />
– Two tasks from the Test <strong>of</strong> <strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> Language<br />
(TNL:: Gillam & Pearson, 2004) were used to<br />
elicit narr<strong>at</strong>ives.<br />
2
Method (Cont’d)<br />
Stimuli – L<strong>at</strong>e for School<br />
Stimuli - Aliens<br />
Method (Cont’d)<br />
D<strong>at</strong>a Reduction<br />
Method (Cont’d)<br />
– <strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> samples were transcribed and entered<br />
into the System<strong>at</strong>ic Analysis <strong>of</strong> Language<br />
Transcripts (SALT:<br />
Miller and Chapman, 2000).<br />
Each narr<strong>at</strong>ive was segmented into T-units<br />
– File identifiers were removed.<br />
Method (Cont’d)<br />
Coding<br />
– Each T-unit was coded as one or more <strong>of</strong> the<br />
following codes<br />
Settings<br />
Initi<strong>at</strong>ing events<br />
Internal responses<br />
Superordin<strong>at</strong>e or subordin<strong>at</strong>e goals<br />
Attempts<br />
Superordin<strong>at</strong>e or subordin<strong>at</strong>e outcomes<br />
– Used Causal Network Model to identify the<br />
hierarchical goal structures, i.e., GAO units<br />
Example<br />
1. In the morning, Jason woke up and was almost<br />
l<strong>at</strong>e for school. (superordin<strong>at</strong>e goal-inferred)<br />
2. He wanted to c<strong>at</strong>ch his school bus to get to<br />
school. (subordin<strong>at</strong>e goal 1)<br />
3. He went downstairs to get his breakfast<br />
quickly. (<strong>at</strong>tempt)<br />
4. Then he went to tie his shoes. (<strong>at</strong>tempt)<br />
5. But he just missed his school bus.<br />
(subordin<strong>at</strong>e outcome 1)<br />
6. And he had to walk to school. (<strong>at</strong>tempt)<br />
7. Finally he got to school. (subordin<strong>at</strong>e<br />
outcome 1)<br />
8. His teacher told him th<strong>at</strong> he was l<strong>at</strong>e for<br />
school. (superordin<strong>at</strong>e outcome)<br />
Method (Cont’d)<br />
Reliability<br />
– The third author coded 20% <strong>of</strong> the samples<br />
from each group.<br />
– Inter-coder agreement was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed for<br />
each coding c<strong>at</strong>egory as well as each GAO<br />
unit. The agreement ranged from 75% to 85%.<br />
3
Results<br />
# <strong>of</strong> Subjects<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
Results: GAO Units Analysis<br />
38%<br />
54%<br />
8%<br />
8% 14%<br />
86%<br />
100%<br />
# <strong>of</strong> Complete<br />
Superordin<strong>at</strong>e<br />
GAO Units<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
L<strong>at</strong>e for School<br />
0<br />
Typical<br />
<strong>ADHD</strong><br />
Only<br />
<strong>ADHD</strong>+LI<br />
2 (2, 25) = 7.896, p=.019, 2 =.329<br />
# <strong>of</strong> Subjects<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Results: GAO Units Analysis<br />
8%<br />
46%<br />
38%<br />
8%<br />
Typical<br />
43%<br />
43%<br />
14%<br />
<strong>ADHD</strong><br />
Only<br />
80%<br />
20%<br />
<strong>ADHD</strong>+LI<br />
2 (2, 25) = 9.191, p=.010, 2 =.383<br />
# <strong>of</strong> Complete<br />
Superordin<strong>at</strong>e<br />
GAO Units<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Aliens<br />
Discussion<br />
<strong>Children</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> only organized<br />
narr<strong>at</strong>ives <strong>with</strong> GAO units as well as<br />
typical children<br />
Language st<strong>at</strong>us accounted for differences<br />
in the use <strong>of</strong> GAO units <strong>with</strong>in the<br />
narr<strong>at</strong>ives<br />
– I.e., <strong>Children</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong>+LI had fewer<br />
complete superordin<strong>at</strong>e GAO units<br />
Implic<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
The GAO unit analysis, specifically<br />
completeness <strong>of</strong> the superordin<strong>at</strong>e GAO<br />
unit, may be useful for identifying<br />
organiz<strong>at</strong>ion difficulties in school-age<br />
children’s narr<strong>at</strong>ives<br />
A shorter version <strong>of</strong> the elicit<strong>at</strong>ion task can<br />
reveal differences in narr<strong>at</strong>ive organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Limit<strong>at</strong>ions and Future<br />
Research<br />
Small sample size<br />
Small narr<strong>at</strong>ive samples<br />
Include a group <strong>of</strong> children <strong>with</strong> language<br />
impairment and no <strong>ADHD</strong> to further<br />
examine the effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> on narr<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
4
Questions<br />
5