18.01.2015 Views

Narrative Organization Skills of Children with ADHD - University at ...

Narrative Organization Skills of Children with ADHD - University at ...

Narrative Organization Skills of Children with ADHD - University at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Goals<br />

<strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>Skills</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Children</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong><br />

Fei Luo, Geralyn Timler,& Dawn Vogler-<br />

Elias<br />

Child Language Labor<strong>at</strong>ory<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>at</strong> Buffalo<br />

To demonstr<strong>at</strong>e the narr<strong>at</strong>ive organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

skills <strong>of</strong> children <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong><br />

To introduce a new narr<strong>at</strong>ive analysis<br />

method<br />

<strong>ADHD</strong><br />

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder<br />

Developmentally inappropri<strong>at</strong>e levels <strong>of</strong><br />

in<strong>at</strong>tention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity<br />

(American Psychi<strong>at</strong>ric Associ<strong>at</strong>ion, 2000)<br />

<strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>s<br />

Story telling or retelling<br />

Important in daily social interaction and<br />

academic activities (Trabasso & Stein,<br />

1997)<br />

<strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Children</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong><br />

Story retellings were shorter (Zentall, 1988)<br />

and less organized (Tannock, Purvis, and<br />

Schachar, 1993)<br />

Had more sequence errors,<br />

misinterpret<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> the original stories,<br />

and word substitutions (Purvis & Tannock,<br />

1997)<br />

Problems<br />

Language st<strong>at</strong>us<br />

– High r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> comorbidity <strong>of</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> and<br />

language impairments (LI)<br />

35~50% <strong>of</strong> children <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> have concurrent<br />

language impairments<br />

R<strong>at</strong>es can be as high as 90% in studies using<br />

clinically referred samples<br />

(Baker & Cantwell, 1992; Beitchman et al., 2001;<br />

Tannock & Schachar, 1996)<br />

1


<strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion</strong><br />

Coherent narr<strong>at</strong>ives are usually organized<br />

by hierarchical goal structures (Trabasso<br />

& Nickels, 1992; Trabasso et al., 1992)<br />

Goal structure: a goal and its associ<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

<strong>at</strong>tempts and outcomes (GAO units)<br />

– Different levels <strong>of</strong> goals: superordin<strong>at</strong>e goals<br />

and subordin<strong>at</strong>e goals<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Goal Structures<br />

(Trabasso & Nickels, 1992)<br />

3 and 4-year-olds begin to use goal<br />

structures (i.e., GAO units) to organize<br />

their narr<strong>at</strong>ives.<br />

9-year-olds produce as many complete<br />

GAO units as adults.<br />

– Complete GAO = goal + <strong>at</strong>tempt + outcome<br />

Causal Network Model<br />

(Trabasso, et al, 1989)<br />

Used to identify the GAO units in narr<strong>at</strong>ives<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the GAO units is a more useful<br />

measure <strong>of</strong> narr<strong>at</strong>ive organiz<strong>at</strong>ion in children<br />

<strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> (Renz, et al., 2003).<br />

Research Question<br />

Do typical children, children <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong><br />

only, and children <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong>+LI differ in<br />

their narr<strong>at</strong>ive organiz<strong>at</strong>ion skills,<br />

specifically their use <strong>of</strong> hierarchical goal<br />

structures, indexed by GAO units<br />

Participants<br />

Means<br />

(SD)<br />

C.A. in<br />

months<br />

CELF-4<br />

Core<br />

Language<br />

Method<br />

Typical<br />

(n = 13)<br />

121 (15)<br />

114 (8)<br />

<strong>ADHD</strong><br />

Only<br />

(n = 7)<br />

126 (23)<br />

100 (16)<br />

<strong>ADHD</strong> +<br />

LI<br />

(n = 5)<br />

121 (12)<br />

76 (3)<br />

Method (Cont’d)<br />

Stimuli<br />

– Two tasks from the Test <strong>of</strong> <strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> Language<br />

(TNL:: Gillam & Pearson, 2004) were used to<br />

elicit narr<strong>at</strong>ives.<br />

2


Method (Cont’d)<br />

Stimuli – L<strong>at</strong>e for School<br />

Stimuli - Aliens<br />

Method (Cont’d)<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a Reduction<br />

Method (Cont’d)<br />

– <strong>Narr<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> samples were transcribed and entered<br />

into the System<strong>at</strong>ic Analysis <strong>of</strong> Language<br />

Transcripts (SALT:<br />

Miller and Chapman, 2000).<br />

Each narr<strong>at</strong>ive was segmented into T-units<br />

– File identifiers were removed.<br />

Method (Cont’d)<br />

Coding<br />

– Each T-unit was coded as one or more <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following codes<br />

Settings<br />

Initi<strong>at</strong>ing events<br />

Internal responses<br />

Superordin<strong>at</strong>e or subordin<strong>at</strong>e goals<br />

Attempts<br />

Superordin<strong>at</strong>e or subordin<strong>at</strong>e outcomes<br />

– Used Causal Network Model to identify the<br />

hierarchical goal structures, i.e., GAO units<br />

Example<br />

1. In the morning, Jason woke up and was almost<br />

l<strong>at</strong>e for school. (superordin<strong>at</strong>e goal-inferred)<br />

2. He wanted to c<strong>at</strong>ch his school bus to get to<br />

school. (subordin<strong>at</strong>e goal 1)<br />

3. He went downstairs to get his breakfast<br />

quickly. (<strong>at</strong>tempt)<br />

4. Then he went to tie his shoes. (<strong>at</strong>tempt)<br />

5. But he just missed his school bus.<br />

(subordin<strong>at</strong>e outcome 1)<br />

6. And he had to walk to school. (<strong>at</strong>tempt)<br />

7. Finally he got to school. (subordin<strong>at</strong>e<br />

outcome 1)<br />

8. His teacher told him th<strong>at</strong> he was l<strong>at</strong>e for<br />

school. (superordin<strong>at</strong>e outcome)<br />

Method (Cont’d)<br />

Reliability<br />

– The third author coded 20% <strong>of</strong> the samples<br />

from each group.<br />

– Inter-coder agreement was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed for<br />

each coding c<strong>at</strong>egory as well as each GAO<br />

unit. The agreement ranged from 75% to 85%.<br />

3


Results<br />

# <strong>of</strong> Subjects<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Results: GAO Units Analysis<br />

38%<br />

54%<br />

8%<br />

8% 14%<br />

86%<br />

100%<br />

# <strong>of</strong> Complete<br />

Superordin<strong>at</strong>e<br />

GAO Units<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

L<strong>at</strong>e for School<br />

0<br />

Typical<br />

<strong>ADHD</strong><br />

Only<br />

<strong>ADHD</strong>+LI<br />

2 (2, 25) = 7.896, p=.019, 2 =.329<br />

# <strong>of</strong> Subjects<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Results: GAO Units Analysis<br />

8%<br />

46%<br />

38%<br />

8%<br />

Typical<br />

43%<br />

43%<br />

14%<br />

<strong>ADHD</strong><br />

Only<br />

80%<br />

20%<br />

<strong>ADHD</strong>+LI<br />

2 (2, 25) = 9.191, p=.010, 2 =.383<br />

# <strong>of</strong> Complete<br />

Superordin<strong>at</strong>e<br />

GAO Units<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Aliens<br />

Discussion<br />

<strong>Children</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> only organized<br />

narr<strong>at</strong>ives <strong>with</strong> GAO units as well as<br />

typical children<br />

Language st<strong>at</strong>us accounted for differences<br />

in the use <strong>of</strong> GAO units <strong>with</strong>in the<br />

narr<strong>at</strong>ives<br />

– I.e., <strong>Children</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong>+LI had fewer<br />

complete superordin<strong>at</strong>e GAO units<br />

Implic<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

The GAO unit analysis, specifically<br />

completeness <strong>of</strong> the superordin<strong>at</strong>e GAO<br />

unit, may be useful for identifying<br />

organiz<strong>at</strong>ion difficulties in school-age<br />

children’s narr<strong>at</strong>ives<br />

A shorter version <strong>of</strong> the elicit<strong>at</strong>ion task can<br />

reveal differences in narr<strong>at</strong>ive organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Limit<strong>at</strong>ions and Future<br />

Research<br />

Small sample size<br />

Small narr<strong>at</strong>ive samples<br />

Include a group <strong>of</strong> children <strong>with</strong> language<br />

impairment and no <strong>ADHD</strong> to further<br />

examine the effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>ADHD</strong> on narr<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

4


Questions<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!