18.01.2015 Views

1st EuCornea Congress

1st EuCornea Congress

1st EuCornea Congress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>1st</strong> <strong>EuCornea</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> venice, 17-19 june 2010<br />

INVITED SPEAKERS<br />

Stoiber, Josef<br />

Visual rehabilitation with the Boston keratoprosthesis<br />

J. Stoiber, J. Ruckhofer, G. Grabner<br />

Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria<br />

Purpose: Implantation of a keratoprosthesis is the last resort in visual<br />

rehabilitation in patients with bilateral severely damaged ocular surface not<br />

amenable to conventional corneal transplantation or surface reconstruction.<br />

Development of the Boston keratoprosthesis was started in the sixties by<br />

Claes Dohlman. Changes in design and the postoperative regimen led to<br />

further improvement of medium and long term prognosis. We describe the<br />

outcome of the first patients receiving a Boston keratoprosthesis at the<br />

Salzburg University Eye Clinic.<br />

Methods: Within the last 30 months implantation of a Boston<br />

keratoprosthesis was performed in 12 patients. Most frequent indications<br />

were ocular burn, followed by multiple corneal graft failure. Results:<br />

Implantation of the Boston keratoprosthesis could be performed without<br />

major complications in all patients. Improvement in visual acuity could be<br />

obtained in most of the patients, one patient even achieving 20/25 vision.<br />

Conclusion: Indication for the Boston keratoprosthesis include severe<br />

corneal burn and bullous keratopathy following multiple corneal graft failure.<br />

It represents an additional option for visual rehabilitation in eyes with<br />

severely impaired ocular surface.<br />

Tan, Donald<br />

Clinical trial results of endothelial keratoplasty with<br />

the EndoGlide donor inserter<br />

D. Tan, J. Mehta, Wb. Khor<br />

Singapore National Eye Clinic Singapore<br />

Purpose: To describe safety and efficacy and endothelial cell loss rates<br />

in DSAEK with the Tan EndoGlide, a new DSAEK donor inserter, in our first<br />

clinical cases within a clinical trial setting.<br />

Methods: The EndoGlide (Angiotech, USA, and Network Medical<br />

Products, UK) is a new disposable donor inserter for DSAEK surgery. The<br />

design incorporates double-coiling of the donor lamella within a sealed,<br />

clear plastic chamber, with no endothelial touch. The chamber is inserted<br />

through a 4.5mm wound into the AC with an anterior glide to prevent iris<br />

prolapse, and the donor is pulled through into the AC with intraocular<br />

forceps. We performed EndoGlide assisted DSAEK in the first 30 Asian<br />

patients within an IRB approved prospective, non-randomized clinical trial.<br />

Outcome measures included ease of donor insertion, primary graft failure<br />

and donor dislocation rates, and endothelial cell loss up to 12 months.<br />

Results: Indications included PBK/ABK (n=14), Fuchs dystrophy (n=12),<br />

and others (PPMD, DM detachment, failed DSAEK: n=4). Procedures<br />

included DSAEK alone (n=19) and phaco-DSAEK (n=11). Successful donor<br />

coiling was achieved and the Endoglide delivered the donor safely into the<br />

AC with no AC collapse at any stage, and with minimal endothelial touch in<br />

all cases. No cases of primary graft failure or donor dislocation occurred.<br />

Mean endothelial cell loss at 3 months (20 eyes), 6 months (18 eyes) and<br />

12 months (6 eyes) was 10.1%, 13.7% and 19.0% respectively.<br />

Conclusion: Our first clinical cases confirm that the Tan EndoGlide<br />

simplifies donor insertion, has a short learning curve, and appears to be<br />

safe and effective. Relatively low endothelial cell loss rates in the first year<br />

compare very favourably to all other published endothelial cell loss rates in<br />

the current literature.<br />

Terry, Mark<br />

Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK):<br />

Promises and Problems<br />

M. Terry<br />

Devers Eye Institute Oregon USA<br />

Methods: The peer-reviewed published literature was reviewed for DMEK<br />

and compared to published literature of a single center series of DSAEK.<br />

Outcomes of visual acuity and outcomes of the complications of primary<br />

graft failure (PGF), dislocation and endothelial survival were compared.<br />

Results: The only published cases of DMEK were by Dr. Melles (n=50)<br />

and by Dr. Price (n=60). These were compared to those of Dr. Terry<br />

(n=160). The visual acuity of DMEK at 3 months (mean Va=20/25) was<br />

superior to that of DSAEK (mean Va=20/30) at 6 months and DMEK had<br />

a higher % of eyes that were 20/20 or better (26%) than that of DSAEK<br />

(13%). However, all complication rates were higher for DMEK than DSAEK<br />

with PGF rate for DMEK of 16% and DSAEK of 0% and a re-bubbling rate<br />

of 63% for DMEK and 1.8% for DSAEK. The endothelial cell loss of both<br />

procedures at 6 months appears to be about the same at 28%.<br />

Conclusions: While the visual results of DMEK appear to be about<br />

one line better than DSAEK, the complications of PGF and dislocation are<br />

dramatically higher with DMEK than with DSAEK.<br />

Toro, Patricia<br />

DALK in herpes simplex corneal opacities<br />

P. Toro<br />

Misericordia Hospital Grosseto Italy<br />

Purpose: To report our experience with deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty<br />

(DALK) for the treatment of corneal opacities following herpetic keratitis<br />

Setting: Fifty two eyes with post-herpetic stromal scars with intact<br />

endothelium treated with DALK between 2002 and 2006 at Misericordia<br />

Hospital<br />

Methods:The main outcome were the ability to successfully expose DM<br />

(dDALK), the number of cases with predescemetic plane (pdDALK), pre and<br />

postoperative visual acuity and endothelial cell count. The mean follow-up<br />

period was 31 months. Therapeutic protocol, recurrence of herpetic keratitis<br />

and corneal rejection were evaluated.<br />

Results: Descemetic DALK (dDALK) was done in 45/52 cases (86,5%),<br />

while pdDALK was done in 7/52 cases (13,5%). Ruptures of Descemet’s<br />

membrane occurred in 2/52 cases (3,8%) in our series. Postoperative BSCVA<br />

was 20/20 in 27/52 cases (52%) and at least 80% of patients achieved 20/30<br />

at long term follow-up. Average endothelial cell loss was 205,32 cell/mm2.<br />

Therapeutic protocol was conducted with long-term therapy with oral antiviral<br />

drugs and topic steroids after DALK.<br />

Conclusions: DALK is an alternative and safe procedure to restore vision<br />

in cases with significant corneal scarring due to recurrent HSV keratitis with<br />

healthy endothelium. Pre and postoperative antiviral prophylaxis is necessary<br />

to prevent recurrence<br />

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: 0<br />

Traverso, Carlo<br />

Cornea & Glaucoma<br />

C. Traverso<br />

Clinica Oculistica, Di.N.O.G., University of Genova, Genoa, Italy<br />

Glaucoma worsening is the leading cause of irreversible visual loss after<br />

perforating keratoplasty (PKP) attributable to optic nerve damage. The<br />

incidence of post-PK glaucoma varies from 9% to 31% in the early and<br />

late postoperative period. The incidence of postoperative IOP elevations is<br />

associated with the preoperative diagnosis of corneal disease. While the<br />

lowest incidence is commonly detected in patients with keratoconus, bullous<br />

keratopathy, graft rejection, previous glaucoma presence and trauma have<br />

been reported to be high risks factors.<br />

Purpose: As Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) continues to evolve, newer<br />

forms of this surgery need to be evaluated in terms of benefits and risks.<br />

This evaluation must be done in a scientific manner, comparing known<br />

outcomes and complications of each technique of EK.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!