Automatic testing of solvers using PyFoam - If your ... - OpenFOAMWiki

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Introduction The tools: pyFoam in 3 minutes The tools: swak4Foam - 3 more minutes Case study: Taylor-Green vortex Case study: Pitz-Daily CTest Conclusion Introduction The basic test Variations of the test Testing tests without running the solver 1 > . / r u n T a y l o r G r e e n B a s i c . py −−jump−to−t e s t s −−read−run−i n f o −−p r i n t −run−i n f o . . . . 3 TEST T a y l o r G r e e n B a s i c : S k i p p i n g c l o n i n g TEST T a y l o r G r e e n B a s i c : S k i p p i n g c a s e p r e p a r a t i o n 5 TEST T a y l o r G r e e n B a s i c : S k i p p i n g the s e r i a l pre−t e s t s TEST T a y l o r G r e e n B a s i c : S k i p p i n g the pre−t e s t s 7 TEST T a y l o r G r e e n B a s i c : S k i p p i n g r u n n i n g o f the s i m u l a t i o n 9 r u n I n f o used i n f u r t h e r t e s t s { ’OK’ : True , 11 ’ time ’ : 1 0 . 0 , ’ analyzed ’ : { ’ C o n t i n u i t y ’ : { ’ Cumulative ’ : −1.67748343251 e −17, 13 ’ Global ’ : 5.49262792193 e −20} , ’UMax ’ : { ’ A n a l yticalChange_average ’ : 0.584612101823 , 15 ’ Simulation_average ’ : 0.0936732688093 , ’ Simulation_max ’ : 0.13308341611 , 17 ’ AnalyticalChange_max ’ : 0.8297742872 , ’ A n a l y t i c a l _ a v e r a g e ’ : 0.0936466715372 , 19 ’ Analytical_max ’ : 0.132918220272 , ’ Change_average ’ : 0.58458573022 , 21 ’ Change_max ’ : 0.829733836868 , ’ I n i t i a l _ a v e r a g e ’ : 0.67825877336 , 23 ’ I n i t i a l _ m a x ’ : 0.962692507472} , ’ Execution ’ : { ’ c l o c k ’ : 0 . 0 , ’ cpu ’ : 0.010000000000000009} , 25 ’ I t e r a t i o n s ’ : { ’Ux ’ : 1 . 0 , ’Uy ’ : 2 . 0 , ’ p ’ : 1 2 . 0 } , ’ L i n e a r ’ : { ’Ux ’ : 0.0099072768056 , 27 ’ Ux_final ’ : 6.28399285481 e −06, ’ U x _ i t e r a t i o n s ’ : 1 . 0 , 29 ’Uy ’ : 0.00990316129082 , ’ Uy_final ’ : 2.25393477893 e −08, 31 ’ U y _ i t e r a t i o n s ’ : 2 . 0 , ’ p ’ : 0.0195989556445 , 33 ’ p _ final ’ : 3.06334805676 e −07, ’ p _ i t e r a t i o n s ’ : 1 2 . 0 } , Bernhard F.W. Gschaider Automatic testing of solvers using PyFoam 82/164
Introduction The tools: pyFoam in 3 minutes The tools: swak4Foam - 3 more minutes Case study: Taylor-Green vortex Case study: Pitz-Daily CTest Conclusion Introduction The basic test Variations of the test Testing whether the run ended • The first checks whether the time in the runInfo is equal to the endTime in the controlDict • If it is smaller then the run ended abnormally def postRunTestReallyReachedEnd ( s e l f ) : 2 i f s e l f . r u n I n f o ( ) [ "time"]< s e l f . c o n t r o l D i c t ( ) [ "endTime" ] : s e l f . f a i l ( "Simulation␣did␣not␣reach␣ endTime" , 4 s e l f . c o n t r o l D i c t ( ) [ "endTime" ] , "only" , s e l f . r u n I n f o ( ) [ "time" ] ) Bernhard F.W. Gschaider Automatic testing of solvers using PyFoam 83/164
Page 1 and 2:
Introduction The tools: pyFoam in 3
Page 3 and 4:
Outline Introduction The tools: pyF
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Warning Introduction The tools: pyF
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Running Introduction The tools: pyF
Page 25 and 26:
Plotting Introduction The tools: py
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32: Outline Introduction The tools: pyF
Page 33 and 34: Introduction The tools: pyFoam in 3
Page 81: The runInfo Introduction The tools:
Page 101 and 102: Comparisons Introduction The tools:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
show all

Automatic testing of solvers using PyFoam - If your ... - OpenFOAMWiki

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?