How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case - League of California Cities

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Prejudicial Abuse of Discretion ‣ Agency failed to proceed in manner required by law ‣ Decision not supported by findings ‣ Findings not supported by evidence
Absence of Findings ‣ Agency must set forth findings “to bridge the analytic gap between the raw evidence and the ultimate decision or order” ‣ (Topanga Ass’n for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal.3d 506, 515.)
Page 1 and 2: How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate C
Page 3 and 4: The Nature of a Writ of Mandate ‣
Page 5 and 6: Traditional Mandate Under CCP §108
Page 7 and 8: Discretionary Duty ‣ The writ can
Page 9 and 10: Review Confined to Administrative R
Page 11 and 12: Traditional Mandate: Public Interes
Page 13 and 14: Traditional Mandate: Inadequacy of
Page 15 and 16: Traditional Mandate - Procedure ‣
Page 17 and 18: Traditional Mandate Procedure ‣ I
Page 19 and 20: Traditional Mandate - Demurrer, Ans
Page 21 and 22: Trial and Judgment ‣ Trial on dis
Page 23 and 24: Traditional Mandate: Other Applicab
Page 25 and 26: Administrative Mandate - Grounds
Page 27: Fair trial Before Administrative Tr
Page 31 and 32: Independent Judgment ‣ Required w
Page 33 and 34: Substantial Evidence and Burden of
Page 35 and 36: Administrative Mandate Procedure Pr
Page 37 and 38: Administrative Mandate: Judgment, R
Page 39: Conclusion ‣Do preventative advan

How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case - League of California Cities

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?