19.01.2015 Views

Negotiations in a Post PEPRA World - League of California Cities

Negotiations in a Post PEPRA World - League of California Cities

Negotiations in a Post PEPRA World - League of California Cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Negotiations</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Post</strong><br />

<strong>PEPRA</strong> <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> CA <strong>Cities</strong>- Employee Relations Policy Committee<br />

April 4, 2013<br />

Presented by: Steven M. Berl<strong>in</strong>er


To Be Discussed<br />

EPRA Summary<br />

ow <strong>PEPRA</strong> Affects <strong>Negotiations</strong><br />

ptions to Consider for New Members<br />

ost Shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pecial Compensation<br />

etiree Medical<br />

) Vest<strong>in</strong>g Issues<br />

) Retiree Medical Options<br />

) Negotiation Strategies


<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary - Employers<br />

ll public employers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g MOST charter cities and<br />

ounties<br />

xception for charter cities and charter counties with an<br />

dependent pension plan NOT subject to state-wide<br />

cheme such as PERL or ‘37 Act<br />

chool Districts and CCDs are subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />

Examples:<br />

• Charter city with <strong>in</strong>dependent pension plan – NOT subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />

• Charter city <strong>in</strong> PERS system – subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />

• General law city with <strong>in</strong>dependent plan – subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong>


<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Employees<br />

enerally, only new member are subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />

urrent employees are exempt from most <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />

Notable provisions that apply to current employees<br />

• Prohibition aga<strong>in</strong>st air time purchases<br />

• New post-retirement work restrictions<br />

• Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2018, higher employee contributions can be<br />

imposed<br />

Most lateral hires from other public agencies (for the time<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g) NOT subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />

Lateral hires who are not “new members” will have<br />

retirement plan that was place on December 31, 2012


<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – New Member<br />

n employee who becomes a member <strong>of</strong> a public<br />

tirement system for the first time on or after<br />

anuary 1, 2013; and<br />

Was not a member <strong>of</strong> a public retirement system before<br />

January 1, 2013; or<br />

Was a member <strong>of</strong> a public retirement system before<br />

January 1, 2013 that is not subject to reciprocity with the<br />

new public employer’s plan; or<br />

Alternatively, anyone who was an active member <strong>of</strong> a<br />

retirement system, has a break <strong>in</strong> service <strong>of</strong> six months<br />

or more, and returns to active membership <strong>in</strong> the same<br />

system with a new employer.


<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Retirement Formulas<br />

for Miscellaneous New Members<br />

iscellaneous New Members<br />

2% @ 62<br />

Ranges from 1% @ 52 to 25% @ 67<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum retirement age = 52<br />

No other options for formula


<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Retirement<br />

Formulas for Safety Employees<br />

hree different plans – must provide the one<br />

quired by statute<br />

. Basic Safety Plan: 2% @ 57 (range from 1.426% @ 50 to<br />

2%@ 57)<br />

. Safety Option Plan One: 2.5% @ 57 (range from 2.0% @<br />

50 to 2.5% @ 57)<br />

. Safety Option Plan Two: 2.7% @ 57 (range from 2.0% @<br />

50 to 2.7% @ 57)<br />

‣ MUST provide plan that is closest (but lower) than current plan at<br />

age 55<br />

‣ Most will be required to provide 2.7% @ 57<br />

‣ Can provide a lower plan by agreement (for hires after effective<br />

date <strong>of</strong> plan amendment)


<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Employee<br />

Contributions<br />

urrent employees’ rules not changed<br />

ew members:<br />

Must pay at least 50% <strong>of</strong> “normal cost”<br />

No EPMC<br />

Contribution rate not adjusted unless annual normal<br />

cost changes more than 1%<br />

Can agree that employees pay more if collectively<br />

barga<strong>in</strong>ed and agreed; an agency is not pay<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

higher percentage for non-represented,<br />

management, etc. <strong>in</strong> the same membership class


<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Exist<strong>in</strong>g MOU<br />

<strong>in</strong> Place Before 1/1/13<br />

impaired by <strong>PEPRA</strong> (on issue <strong>of</strong> employee<br />

ontributions), then MOU requirements apply to<br />

ew members until the earlier <strong>of</strong> the MOU’s<br />

. Expiration<br />

. Extension<br />

. Amendment


How <strong>PEPRA</strong> Affects <strong>Negotiations</strong><br />

ptional retirement formulas are gone<br />

ome items <strong>of</strong> special compensation will not be<br />

reditable<br />

o EPMC for new members<br />

o retroactive application <strong>of</strong> optional benefits<br />

upplemental def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit plans are <strong>of</strong>f the table for<br />

ew employees<br />

<strong>in</strong>al Compensation must be 36 months for new<br />

embers<br />

xist<strong>in</strong>g MOU impairments regard<strong>in</strong>g EPMC


How <strong>PEPRA</strong> Affects <strong>Negotiations</strong><br />

ess flexibility <strong>in</strong> concession barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

rgument that mandatory <strong>PEPRA</strong> provisions<br />

re already a take-away by the employer<br />

rgument the employer now has more $$ to<br />

ive<br />

isagreements <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PEPRA</strong> will<br />

ause delays; lawsuits<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g for fact-f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agreement reached, will CalPERS or County<br />

etirement Board agree


Options to Consider for New<br />

Members<br />

lassic members are pay<strong>in</strong>g less for better benefits<br />

it politically better to elim<strong>in</strong>ate EPMC<br />

ew or better retiree medical<br />

Vested rights considerations<br />

Do you have to do the same for classic members<br />

57 plans or other def<strong>in</strong>ed contribution plans<br />

Subject to limitations for highly compensated employees<br />

igher salaries<br />

Increases f<strong>in</strong>al compensation<br />

Increases only <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al year will be rejected


Cost-Shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

vailable for all employees<br />

ot limited to optional benefits<br />

ay be member contributions or employer<br />

ontributions<br />

ay <strong>of</strong>fset significant amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

mployer contributions


Special Compensation<br />

an be reduced or elim<strong>in</strong>ated for all employees<br />

you have it, it must be reported<br />

nyth<strong>in</strong>g granted for f<strong>in</strong>al year <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

ill not be credited


Retiree Medical - Vest<strong>in</strong>g Issues<br />

esolutions/Ord<strong>in</strong>ances<br />

Burden is on employee to prove govern<strong>in</strong>g body <strong>in</strong>tended<br />

to create contract<br />

OUs<br />

Contract language must <strong>in</strong>dicate agreement that benefit<br />

extend beyond the life <strong>of</strong> the MOU<br />

Contract by implication<br />

Vested:<br />

Cannot reduce or elim<strong>in</strong>ate for current employees, without<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g equal alternative benefits<br />

Can elim<strong>in</strong>ate or reduce for future employees, unless<br />

prohibited by statute (PEMHCA)


Vest<strong>in</strong>g Issues<br />

eferable Language:<br />

ur<strong>in</strong>g the term <strong>of</strong> this agreement only….”<br />

mployees who retire dur<strong>in</strong>g the term <strong>of</strong> this<br />

greement shall be eligible for…”<br />

this benefit shall not be considered a vested<br />

enefit and may be changed at any time after<br />

e expiration <strong>of</strong> the MOU”


Retiree Medical - Options<br />

umber <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> service to qualify<br />

<strong>PEPRA</strong>: Vest<strong>in</strong>g schedule may not be shorter for<br />

managerial, elected, or appo<strong>in</strong>ted employees than<br />

for other employees<br />

ontributions to Retiree Medical Trust, HSAs<br />

tc. dur<strong>in</strong>g employment<br />

Highly recommended, more flexibility, no vested<br />

rights to contribution<br />

alPERS medical (PEMHCA)<br />

Less flexibility and options<br />

Equal and m<strong>in</strong>imum contribution rules


Negotiation Strategies<br />

creas<strong>in</strong>g retiree medical benefit based on<br />

creas<strong>in</strong>g number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> service<br />

ontributions to retiree medical sav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ccounts act like EPMC<br />

educ<strong>in</strong>g or elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g expensive retiree<br />

edical for new hires<br />

alPERS Medical:<br />

Cafeteria plans to avoid equal contribution rule


Questions<br />

teven M. Berl<strong>in</strong>er<br />

artner | Los Angeles Office<br />

10.981.2000 | sberl<strong>in</strong>er@lcwlegal.com<br />

ttp://www.lcwlegal.com/steve-berl<strong>in</strong>er

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!