Negotiations in a Post PEPRA World - League of California Cities
Negotiations in a Post PEPRA World - League of California Cities
Negotiations in a Post PEPRA World - League of California Cities
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Negotiations</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Post</strong><br />
<strong>PEPRA</strong> <strong>World</strong><br />
<strong>League</strong> <strong>of</strong> CA <strong>Cities</strong>- Employee Relations Policy Committee<br />
April 4, 2013<br />
Presented by: Steven M. Berl<strong>in</strong>er
To Be Discussed<br />
EPRA Summary<br />
ow <strong>PEPRA</strong> Affects <strong>Negotiations</strong><br />
ptions to Consider for New Members<br />
ost Shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pecial Compensation<br />
etiree Medical<br />
) Vest<strong>in</strong>g Issues<br />
) Retiree Medical Options<br />
) Negotiation Strategies
<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary - Employers<br />
ll public employers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g MOST charter cities and<br />
ounties<br />
xception for charter cities and charter counties with an<br />
dependent pension plan NOT subject to state-wide<br />
cheme such as PERL or ‘37 Act<br />
chool Districts and CCDs are subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />
Examples:<br />
• Charter city with <strong>in</strong>dependent pension plan – NOT subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />
• Charter city <strong>in</strong> PERS system – subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />
• General law city with <strong>in</strong>dependent plan – subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong>
<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Employees<br />
enerally, only new member are subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />
urrent employees are exempt from most <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />
Notable provisions that apply to current employees<br />
• Prohibition aga<strong>in</strong>st air time purchases<br />
• New post-retirement work restrictions<br />
• Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2018, higher employee contributions can be<br />
imposed<br />
Most lateral hires from other public agencies (for the time<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g) NOT subject to <strong>PEPRA</strong><br />
Lateral hires who are not “new members” will have<br />
retirement plan that was place on December 31, 2012
<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – New Member<br />
n employee who becomes a member <strong>of</strong> a public<br />
tirement system for the first time on or after<br />
anuary 1, 2013; and<br />
Was not a member <strong>of</strong> a public retirement system before<br />
January 1, 2013; or<br />
Was a member <strong>of</strong> a public retirement system before<br />
January 1, 2013 that is not subject to reciprocity with the<br />
new public employer’s plan; or<br />
Alternatively, anyone who was an active member <strong>of</strong> a<br />
retirement system, has a break <strong>in</strong> service <strong>of</strong> six months<br />
or more, and returns to active membership <strong>in</strong> the same<br />
system with a new employer.
<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Retirement Formulas<br />
for Miscellaneous New Members<br />
iscellaneous New Members<br />
2% @ 62<br />
Ranges from 1% @ 52 to 25% @ 67<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imum retirement age = 52<br />
No other options for formula
<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Retirement<br />
Formulas for Safety Employees<br />
hree different plans – must provide the one<br />
quired by statute<br />
. Basic Safety Plan: 2% @ 57 (range from 1.426% @ 50 to<br />
2%@ 57)<br />
. Safety Option Plan One: 2.5% @ 57 (range from 2.0% @<br />
50 to 2.5% @ 57)<br />
. Safety Option Plan Two: 2.7% @ 57 (range from 2.0% @<br />
50 to 2.7% @ 57)<br />
‣ MUST provide plan that is closest (but lower) than current plan at<br />
age 55<br />
‣ Most will be required to provide 2.7% @ 57<br />
‣ Can provide a lower plan by agreement (for hires after effective<br />
date <strong>of</strong> plan amendment)
<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Employee<br />
Contributions<br />
urrent employees’ rules not changed<br />
ew members:<br />
Must pay at least 50% <strong>of</strong> “normal cost”<br />
No EPMC<br />
Contribution rate not adjusted unless annual normal<br />
cost changes more than 1%<br />
Can agree that employees pay more if collectively<br />
barga<strong>in</strong>ed and agreed; an agency is not pay<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
higher percentage for non-represented,<br />
management, etc. <strong>in</strong> the same membership class
<strong>PEPRA</strong> Summary – Exist<strong>in</strong>g MOU<br />
<strong>in</strong> Place Before 1/1/13<br />
impaired by <strong>PEPRA</strong> (on issue <strong>of</strong> employee<br />
ontributions), then MOU requirements apply to<br />
ew members until the earlier <strong>of</strong> the MOU’s<br />
. Expiration<br />
. Extension<br />
. Amendment
How <strong>PEPRA</strong> Affects <strong>Negotiations</strong><br />
ptional retirement formulas are gone<br />
ome items <strong>of</strong> special compensation will not be<br />
reditable<br />
o EPMC for new members<br />
o retroactive application <strong>of</strong> optional benefits<br />
upplemental def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit plans are <strong>of</strong>f the table for<br />
ew employees<br />
<strong>in</strong>al Compensation must be 36 months for new<br />
embers<br />
xist<strong>in</strong>g MOU impairments regard<strong>in</strong>g EPMC
How <strong>PEPRA</strong> Affects <strong>Negotiations</strong><br />
ess flexibility <strong>in</strong> concession barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
rgument that mandatory <strong>PEPRA</strong> provisions<br />
re already a take-away by the employer<br />
rgument the employer now has more $$ to<br />
ive<br />
isagreements <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PEPRA</strong> will<br />
ause delays; lawsuits<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g for fact-f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
agreement reached, will CalPERS or County<br />
etirement Board agree
Options to Consider for New<br />
Members<br />
lassic members are pay<strong>in</strong>g less for better benefits<br />
it politically better to elim<strong>in</strong>ate EPMC<br />
ew or better retiree medical<br />
Vested rights considerations<br />
Do you have to do the same for classic members<br />
57 plans or other def<strong>in</strong>ed contribution plans<br />
Subject to limitations for highly compensated employees<br />
igher salaries<br />
Increases f<strong>in</strong>al compensation<br />
Increases only <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al year will be rejected
Cost-Shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
vailable for all employees<br />
ot limited to optional benefits<br />
ay be member contributions or employer<br />
ontributions<br />
ay <strong>of</strong>fset significant amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
mployer contributions
Special Compensation<br />
an be reduced or elim<strong>in</strong>ated for all employees<br />
you have it, it must be reported<br />
nyth<strong>in</strong>g granted for f<strong>in</strong>al year <strong>of</strong> employment<br />
ill not be credited
Retiree Medical - Vest<strong>in</strong>g Issues<br />
esolutions/Ord<strong>in</strong>ances<br />
Burden is on employee to prove govern<strong>in</strong>g body <strong>in</strong>tended<br />
to create contract<br />
OUs<br />
Contract language must <strong>in</strong>dicate agreement that benefit<br />
extend beyond the life <strong>of</strong> the MOU<br />
Contract by implication<br />
Vested:<br />
Cannot reduce or elim<strong>in</strong>ate for current employees, without<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g equal alternative benefits<br />
Can elim<strong>in</strong>ate or reduce for future employees, unless<br />
prohibited by statute (PEMHCA)
Vest<strong>in</strong>g Issues<br />
eferable Language:<br />
ur<strong>in</strong>g the term <strong>of</strong> this agreement only….”<br />
mployees who retire dur<strong>in</strong>g the term <strong>of</strong> this<br />
greement shall be eligible for…”<br />
this benefit shall not be considered a vested<br />
enefit and may be changed at any time after<br />
e expiration <strong>of</strong> the MOU”
Retiree Medical - Options<br />
umber <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> service to qualify<br />
<strong>PEPRA</strong>: Vest<strong>in</strong>g schedule may not be shorter for<br />
managerial, elected, or appo<strong>in</strong>ted employees than<br />
for other employees<br />
ontributions to Retiree Medical Trust, HSAs<br />
tc. dur<strong>in</strong>g employment<br />
Highly recommended, more flexibility, no vested<br />
rights to contribution<br />
alPERS medical (PEMHCA)<br />
Less flexibility and options<br />
Equal and m<strong>in</strong>imum contribution rules
Negotiation Strategies<br />
creas<strong>in</strong>g retiree medical benefit based on<br />
creas<strong>in</strong>g number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> service<br />
ontributions to retiree medical sav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ccounts act like EPMC<br />
educ<strong>in</strong>g or elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g expensive retiree<br />
edical for new hires<br />
alPERS Medical:<br />
Cafeteria plans to avoid equal contribution rule
Questions<br />
teven M. Berl<strong>in</strong>er<br />
artner | Los Angeles Office<br />
10.981.2000 | sberl<strong>in</strong>er@lcwlegal.com<br />
ttp://www.lcwlegal.com/steve-berl<strong>in</strong>er