18.01.2015 Views

September - 21st Century Music

September - 21st Century Music

September - 21st Century Music

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LANG: I actually think all of my work has a serious intent. I<br />

think that so much of what we are taught in music is the great<br />

man and the great deep thoughts. In some areas of classical<br />

music, we're only encouraged to write the great masterpieces<br />

that take on the great subjects, and only are about life and<br />

death. There's nothing wrong with that; I think that probably<br />

people can still write music that's pretty good that way. But I<br />

think there's something anticlimactic about it, if you go to a<br />

concert, and there's a piece which proclaims itself a<br />

masterpiece and says it's about dark, serious issues, and it's<br />

going to make you cry. And then at the end of the piece, so<br />

you're in the audience crying. But what a letdown. You're<br />

just getting what was promised! It's as if the composer is<br />

standing there smugly at the end saying, "Oh, I'm proud of<br />

myself. See, I told you that you would cry." To me, I think<br />

it's very important to have the experience that's unexpected. I<br />

think I'm more affected by things in which I have to uncover<br />

the serious intent, than when the serious intent is presented for<br />

me on a platter. <strong>Music</strong> in our lives is incredibly manipulative.<br />

Most of the music that we hear is music that is supposed to<br />

make us feel something specific, and we know exactly how<br />

we're supposed to feel. Buy this kind of cereal or car, or feel<br />

this emotion in this movie or TV show. We know what those<br />

emotions are; there's no room for subtlety. Classical music<br />

has a nobility now. It is the only musical experience where<br />

you can have the unexpected emotion -- where you're free to<br />

decide for yourself. I think for me, that realization has made<br />

me make my music more abstract.<br />

ALBURGER: You're not interested in the easy manipulation<br />

-- the easy answer.<br />

LANG: Well... Just for myself, I'm not interested in it. I<br />

recognize its value. I recognize when it's in other people's<br />

music, that that might be perfectly valid. But for me, I want to<br />

have the non-television, non-commercial experience.<br />

ALBURGER: It becomes an interesting challenge, I imagine,<br />

because, if you take a large scale work like your Modern<br />

Painters -- an opera, a music drama -- there's a certain<br />

expectation that you're going to take the audience from point<br />

A to point B. How do you factor that in<br />

LANG: It's the frustrating thing! I learned a lot of things<br />

doing that opera, because it was my first grand opera (I had<br />

done smaller things before). This was a traditional opera,<br />

from a traditional commissioner, for a traditional opera house,<br />

working with very traditional singers. Normally in my life, I<br />

don't work with singers with big vibratos. But I was interested<br />

in figuring out what my relation with the tradition was,<br />

because I am, in many ways, kind of a traditional composer, I<br />

think.<br />

LANG: I put my notes down on paper, and I believe in those<br />

musical worlds. I have a problem with them, but I believe in<br />

them. I believe in the orchestral world. I don't like orchestras<br />

and the way orchestra works are being written now, and I have<br />

a tremendous problem with the whole environment, but,<br />

theoretically, I don't believe that everything in that world has<br />

been said. I believe that there are certain social things about<br />

that world and the way that world is set up which make it<br />

difficult to say anything other that what is being said at<br />

present. I basically think that's a big shame. I don't think that<br />

means that...<br />

ALBURGER: ...you need to give up.<br />

LANG: Well, it doesn't mean for me to give up. Whether or<br />

not that world has given up on me is another question. I'm in<br />

an interesting place in relation to the orchestral world and the<br />

opera world, too, because I'm interested in sort of being an<br />

experimental traditionalist. I sort of figured out what I do<br />

recently. It sounds really silly to even put a label on it. I was<br />

watching something on television where somebody was riding<br />

a bicycle off a cliff, or whatever. I just realized I do Extreme<br />

Classical <strong>Music</strong>. In The Passing Measures, why not have this<br />

beautiful sound last for 45 minutes and change very little<br />

Why not take something which is given -- that the orchestra<br />

can make a beautiful sound -- and put it under a microscope,<br />

and blow it out of proportion, and make something that's<br />

ridiculous and anti-classical music about it But the basic<br />

world that the idea comes from is the classical music world.<br />

ALBURGER: And perhaps, in order to "get the music" in<br />

some sense, one needs to have some sort of connection to that<br />

world.<br />

LANG: Yes. Well, that's an interesting problem for me,<br />

because that's what I'm interested in. But what that means is<br />

that the establishment that knows enough to appreciate what<br />

I'm doing is also exactly the audience that is not interested in<br />

the work! But that's the world I've chosen to live in!<br />

ALBURGER: Again Schoenberg's line to Cage about<br />

"banging your head against the wall."<br />

LANG: Yes. So, back to the opera. It is a very traditional<br />

opera, but I tried to do some things that I considered<br />

subversive. It's about the life of John Ruskin.<br />

ALBURGER: Right.<br />

ALBURGER: You put your notes down on paper.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!