19.01.2015 Views

Testing spelling -- Exploring NAPLAN

Testing spelling -- Exploring NAPLAN

Testing spelling -- Exploring NAPLAN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

proofreading items that gave some students assistance. This difference in the construction<br />

of difficulty has implications for those jurisdictions that measure distance travelled.<br />

Figure 5: Year 3 results<br />

Figure 6: Year 5 results<br />

Figure 7: Year 7 results<br />

Figure 8: Year 9 results<br />

Another anomaly occurs at Year 7, and it also has implications for testing student growth.<br />

In Year 7, and only at this year level, the ‘unidentified’ item words were presented first in<br />

the testbook, an acknowledgment on the part of the test constructor that these items were<br />

easier than the ‘identified’ item words. This was confirmed by our study, because in<br />

dictation, where students are just asked to spell them, these Year 7 unidentified-error target<br />

words do indeed have higher facility than the identified ones. This change in the relative<br />

difficulty of the two <strong>NAPLAN</strong> item sets is a consequence of a particular combination of<br />

confounding factors. Here, these unidentified-error items have high-facility target words<br />

embedded in sentences that have significantly lower reading demands than other papers.<br />

In contrast, the identified word items used on the Year 7 test have lower facilities than<br />

those chosen for the unidentified. There are issues of item and test construction that need<br />

to be explored further in another paper.<br />

Error analysis<br />

Queensland Studies Authority July 2009 | 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!