20.01.2015 Views

Report EM 2005 - E - CEP, the European Organisation for Probation

Report EM 2005 - E - CEP, the European Organisation for Probation

Report EM 2005 - E - CEP, the European Organisation for Probation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.5 Analysing net-widening in <strong>the</strong> context of electronic monitoring<br />

Markus Mayer<br />

Participants noted that net-widening was an important issue and was discussed by<br />

probation services in all countries. But it was also difficult to identify net-widening, and<br />

to compare <strong>the</strong> problem in different legal systems. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it was commonly<br />

agreed that net-widening was more likely in front-door than in back-door programmes.<br />

Some participants commented that judges were sometimes tempted to use electronic<br />

monitoring in a net-widening way. Judges obviously also anticipated <strong>the</strong> consequences of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir judgment and sometimes gave higher sentences in order to prevent <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

electronic monitoring.<br />

The phenomenon of net-widening was also discussed in <strong>the</strong> wider context of general<br />

changes in social control. Participants stated that while <strong>the</strong> quantity of crime had not<br />

changed very much in recent years, <strong>the</strong> response to criminal offences had changed<br />

considerably.<br />

There were some slight differences in <strong>the</strong> points of view expressed in <strong>the</strong> workshop, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>se were related to differences in legal systems or in <strong>the</strong> implementation of electronic<br />

monitoring in different countries.<br />

As <strong>the</strong>re was little or no empirical research on net-widening in <strong>the</strong> countries represented<br />

in <strong>the</strong> workshop (Switzerland, France, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, and Germany), <strong>the</strong><br />

views of participants relied mostly on personal experience.<br />

The most important outcome <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants was an awareness of <strong>the</strong> different ways<br />

of implementing electronic monitoring and <strong>the</strong> difficulties concerning net-widening that<br />

related to each kind of implementation.<br />

It was agreed that it was important <strong>for</strong> practitioners to continue discussing <strong>the</strong><br />

differences in <strong>the</strong> use of electronic monitoring. Such discussions would continue to throw<br />

up important questions which could in <strong>the</strong> end produce a more conscious and reflective<br />

use of electronic monitoring.<br />

5.6 Electronic monitoring and social supervision<br />

Elisabeth Gabella / Annie Kensey<br />

Participants looked at <strong>the</strong> French electronic monitoring system from <strong>the</strong> point of view of<br />

<strong>the</strong> social worker. They were strongly of <strong>the</strong> view that electronic monitoring should<br />

always be combined with social supervision as provided by a social worker. However,<br />

more research was needed on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of combining electronic monitoring and<br />

social supervision in this way.<br />

Participants noted <strong>the</strong> decision to retain electronic monitoring as a function of <strong>the</strong> state<br />

in France.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!