20.01.2015 Views

Here Be Dragons

Here Be Dragons

Here Be Dragons

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HERE BE DRAGONS<br />

tions ago. If we focus entirely on this gene, we can construct an evolutionary<br />

tree that links all the affected individuals to that immigrant,<br />

who becomes their "last common ancestor." But this ignores the fact<br />

that, thanks to sexual reproduction, each of us inherits one half of our<br />

genes from each of two parents, one quarter from each of four grandparents,<br />

and so on. Thus, if we select a different gene to study, that immigrant<br />

will almost certainly not be the common ancestor of all the<br />

affected individuals; in fact, he or she may not show up as an ancestor<br />

to any of them.<br />

Thanks to the development of rapid gene-sequencing techniques, it<br />

has recently become possible to determine the sequences of many<br />

genes across different species. In fact, as of this writing, researchers<br />

have sequenced the complete genomes of fifteen organisms, including<br />

bacteria, archaea, and two eukaryotes (a yeast and a microscopic<br />

worm). It turns out that, indeed, evolutionary trees based on different<br />

genes are different from each other. If one focuses on genes that play<br />

a role in the copying of DNA into RNA and protein ("informational<br />

genes"), for example, one gets trees in which eukaryotes are more<br />

closely related to archaea than to bacteria, as in the i6s TRNA tree. If,<br />

however, one focuses on the much more numerous genes that code<br />

for enzymes involved in regular metabolism ("operational genes"),<br />

one gets trees in which eukaryotes are more closely related to bacteria.<br />

There can only be one true history of evolution. Therefore, the<br />

metaphor of the "tree," while it may apply to single genes, seems not<br />

to adequately describe the evolution of organisms. Rather, we have to<br />

acknowledge that something analogous to sex happens, not just<br />

within species, but between species. Individual species must sometimes<br />

acquire their genetic endowment from more than one parent<br />

species. Instead of always diverging, the paths of evolution also sometimes<br />

rejoin, and the appropriate metaphor for evolutionary history<br />

may not be a "tree" but a "braided channel."<br />

Transfer of genes between different species is, in fact, a well-documented<br />

phenomenon. Bacteria belonging to different species can<br />

pass genes for antibiotic resistance among each other, for example.<br />

One bacterium, Agrobacter tumefaciens, can insert foreign genes into<br />

the genomes of crop plants—it is much used in genetic engineering.<br />

And retroviruses such as HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) can<br />

insert genes into the genome of human cells (although not into<br />

germ-line cells). Thus, one way out of the paradox of the evolutionary<br />

data is to say that the "last common ancestor" was not a single<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!