20.01.2015 Views

Evolution of the Astronomical Eyepiece - Brayebrook Observatory

Evolution of the Astronomical Eyepiece - Brayebrook Observatory

Evolution of the Astronomical Eyepiece - Brayebrook Observatory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EVOLUTION <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ASTRONOMICAL EYEPIECE<br />

Reflection losses may be quantified in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> refractive index gradient at <strong>the</strong> media<br />

boundary, hence:<br />

⎧ ⎪ ⎛<br />

k = 1− µ − µ ⎞<br />

1 2<br />

⎨ ⎜ ⎟<br />

⎩ ⎪ ⎝ µ 1 + µ 2 ⎠<br />

2<br />

⎫ ⎪ ⎧ ⎪<br />

⎬<br />

⎭ ⎪ 1 − ⎛ µ − µ ⎞<br />

2 3<br />

⎨ ⎜ ⎟<br />

⎩ ⎪ ⎝ µ 2 + µ 3 ⎠<br />

2<br />

⎫ ⎪ ⎧<br />

⎬<br />

⎭ ⎪<br />

........... ⎪<br />

1 − ⎛ µ − µ ⎞<br />

n−1 n<br />

⎨ ⎜ ⎟<br />

⎩ ⎪ ⎝ µ n −1 + µ n ⎠<br />

2<br />

⎫ ⎪<br />

⎬<br />

⎭ ⎪<br />

for a cemented surface where:<br />

µ 1<br />

= µ 2<br />

=1.5<br />

(Canada balsam or Xylol)<br />

and where:<br />

µ 3<br />

=1.7 k = 0.39%<br />

µ 3<br />

=1.8 k = 0.83%<br />

µ 3<br />

=1.9 k =1.38%<br />

µ 3<br />

= 2.0 k = 2.04%<br />

and at an air-glass surface where:<br />

µ 2<br />

=1.0<br />

µ 1<br />

=1.5 k = 4.0%<br />

µ 1<br />

=1.6 k = 5.33%<br />

µ = 1.7 k = 6.72%<br />

µ 1<br />

= 1.8 k = 8.16%<br />

µ 1<br />

= 1.9 k = 9.63%<br />

µ 1<br />

= 2.0 k =11.11%<br />

It is <strong>the</strong>refore evident that reflection<br />

losses from an air-glass surface are<br />

greater than from a cemented surface,<br />

but <strong>the</strong>y also increase with <strong>the</strong> index<br />

gradient. Because <strong>the</strong> refractive index<br />

<strong>of</strong> glass changes with wavelength (dispersion),<br />

r eflection losses vary across<br />

<strong>the</strong> spectrum, which is why ghosts<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten assume a specific hue.<br />

Anti-r eflection coatings, developed in<br />

<strong>the</strong> late 1930’s can virtually eliminate<br />

reflection at air -glass surfaces. The<br />

principle involved is <strong>the</strong> suppression <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> reflected incident ray by destructive<br />

interf e rence, ba lanced by constructive<br />

interference in <strong>the</strong> transmitted<br />

pencil arising from reflection within<br />

<strong>the</strong> film.<br />

This can occur when <strong>the</strong> square <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

12<br />

coating index equals <strong>the</strong> glass index,<br />

<strong>the</strong> optical thickness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> film being a<br />

quarter wave. Herein though lies <strong>the</strong><br />

first difficulty, for:<br />

µ<br />

f or crown a nd flint glass are<br />

respectively 1.231 & 1.271, and<br />

no solids have refractive indices as low<br />

as this. Among <strong>the</strong> nearest are lithium<br />

fluoride ( µ=1.39, reducing <strong>the</strong> loss from<br />

between 4% - 5%, to a <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

0.1%,- nearer 1.5% in practice - over<br />

<strong>the</strong> visual spectrum); calcium fluoride<br />

(µ=1.34); sodium and magnesium fluorides;<br />

m agnesium chl oride; silicon<br />

dioxide (µ=1.46); cryolite and certain<br />

fatty acids.<br />

None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are perfect: lithium fluoride<br />

is fragile and soluble in water,<br />

hence useless for outer surfaces;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!