Motion to Quash - Fixfamilycourtnow.org
Motion to Quash - Fixfamilycourtnow.org
Motion to Quash - Fixfamilycourtnow.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):<br />
-ANGELA DA SILVA, CFLS SBN 204950<br />
BALDWIN & BALDWIN<br />
9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 440<br />
San Diego, CA 92122<br />
TELEPHONE NO.: 858.452.2898 FAX NO (Optional)<br />
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):<br />
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Marilyn Weakly<br />
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO<br />
STREET ADDRESS. 1409 Fourth Avenue<br />
MAILING ADDRESS: Same<br />
CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Diego, CA 921 01<br />
BRANCH NAME: Central Division-Madge Bradley Building<br />
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: Ginny L. Caldwell<br />
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: Michael J. Caldwell<br />
OTHER PARENT/PARTY:<br />
REQUEST FOR ORDER D MODIFICATION 0 Temporary Emergency<br />
D Child Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Visitation Court Order<br />
Il Child Support D Spousal Support El Other (specify):<br />
L-I At<strong>to</strong>rney Fees and Costs<br />
<strong>Motion</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quash</strong> and/or<br />
ProtPr.tivP Order Sanctions<br />
12 DI: C 1 g<br />
FOR COURT USE ONLY<br />
-.-<br />
n. n 0<br />
/ . i j<br />
COURT<br />
-;,i Xi`, C A<br />
CASE NUMBER:<br />
D 537320 - WHM<br />
1. TO (name): GINNY EDMUNDS (FKA CALDWELL)<br />
2. A hearing on this Request for Order will be held as follows: If child cus<strong>to</strong>dy or visitation is an issue in this proceeding, Family<br />
Code section 3170 requires mediation before or at the same time as the hearing (see item 7.)<br />
a. Date:<br />
MAR 0 8 2013 - ime: ot<br />
D Room:<br />
b. Address of court same as noted above D other (specify):<br />
3. Attachments <strong>to</strong> be served with this Request for Order:<br />
a. A blank Responsive Declaration (form FL-320) c. 0 Completed Financial Statement (Simplified) (form<br />
b. 0 Completed Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-155) and a blank Financial Statement (Simplified)<br />
FL-150) and a blank Income and Expense<br />
d. D Points and authorities<br />
Declaration<br />
e. D Other (specify):<br />
Date: 12/18/2012<br />
ANGFI A DA SII VA<br />
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)<br />
uj COURT ORDER<br />
4. ✓ I YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR IN COURT AT THE DATE AND TIME LISTED IN ITEM 2 TO GIVE ANY LEGAL<br />
REASON WHY THE ORDERS REQUESTED SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED.<br />
5. La Time for 11 service 11 hearing is shortened. Service must be on or before (date):<br />
6. Any responsive declaration must be served on or before (date):<br />
7. The parties are ordered <strong>to</strong> attend manda<strong>to</strong>ry cus<strong>to</strong>dy services as follows:<br />
(SIGNATURE)<br />
FL-300<br />
8. D You are ordered <strong>to</strong> comply with the Temporary Emergency Court Orders (form FL-305) attached.<br />
9. 1=:1 Other (specify):<br />
Date:<br />
L)EC 1 9 2012<br />
WILLIAM H. MoADAM<br />
JUDICIAL OFFICER<br />
To the person who received this Request for Order: If you wish <strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> this Request for Order, you must file a<br />
Responsive Declaration <strong>to</strong> Request for Order (form FL-320) and serve a copy on the other parties at least nine court days<br />
before the hearing date unless the court has ordered a shorter period of time. You do not have <strong>to</strong> pay a filing fee <strong>to</strong> file the<br />
Responsive Declaration <strong>to</strong> Request for Order (form FL-320) or any other declaration including an Income and Expense<br />
Declaration (form FL-150) or Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155).<br />
Page 1 of 4<br />
Form Adopted for Manda<strong>to</strong>ry Use<br />
Judicial Council of California<br />
FL-300 [Rev. July 1, 2012]<br />
{i<br />
)MainDemA rt<br />
ESSENTIAL FORMS-<br />
REQUEST FOR ORDER Family Code, §§ 2045, 2107, 6224,<br />
6226, 6320-6326, 6380-6383<br />
Government Code, § 26826<br />
www.courts.cagov
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:<br />
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:<br />
OTHER PARENT/PARTY:<br />
Ginny L. Caldwell<br />
Michael J. Caldwell<br />
CASE NUMBER:<br />
D 537320 - WHM<br />
FL-300<br />
4. 0 SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT (An earnings assignment order may be issued.)<br />
a. QAmount requested (monthly): $ c. D Modify existing order<br />
b. 1—.3 Terminate existing order (1) filed on (date):<br />
(1) filed on (date): (2) ordering (specify):<br />
(2) ordering (specify):<br />
d. 0 The Spousal or Partner Support Declaration Attachment (form FL-157) is attached (for modification of spousal or<br />
partner support after judgment only)<br />
e. An Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) must be attached<br />
5. QATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS are requested on Request for At<strong>to</strong>rney Fees and Costs Order Attachment (form FL-319) or a<br />
declaration that addresses the fac<strong>to</strong>rs covered in that form. An Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) must be<br />
attached. A Supporting Declaration for At<strong>to</strong>rney Fees and Costs Order Attachment (form FL-158) or a declaration that<br />
addresses the fac<strong>to</strong>rs covered in that form must also be attached.<br />
6. 0 PROPERTY RESTRAINT D To be ordered pending the hearing<br />
a. The 0 petitioner L:1 respondent 11 claimant is restrained from transferring, encumbering, hypothecating,<br />
concealing, or in any way disposing of any property, real or personal, whether community, quasi-community, or<br />
separate, except in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life.<br />
The applicant will be notified at least five business days before any proposed extraordinary expenditures,<br />
and an accounting of such will be made <strong>to</strong> the court.<br />
b. Q Both parties are restrained and enjoined from cashing, borrowing against, canceling, transferring, disposing of, or<br />
changing the beneficiaries of any insurance or other coverage, including life, health, au<strong>to</strong>mobile, and disability,<br />
held for the benefit of the parties or their minor children.<br />
c. D Neither party may incur any debts or liabilities for which the other may be held responsible, other than in the<br />
ordinary course of business or for the necessities of life.<br />
7. 0 PROPERTY CONTROL D To be ordered pending the hearing<br />
a. D The petitioner respondent is given the exclusive temporary use, possession, and control of the following<br />
property that we own or are buying (specify):<br />
b. L:j The petitioner 0 respondent is ordered <strong>to</strong> make the following payments on liens and encumbrances coming<br />
due while the order is in effect:<br />
Debt Amount of payment Pay <strong>to</strong><br />
8. a OTHER RELIEF (specify):<br />
AN ORDER QUASHING THE DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS FOR PRODUCTION OF BUSINESS<br />
RECORDS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO DIFFERENT BRANCHES OF BANK OF<br />
AMERICA. THE SUBPOENA REFERENCE NUMBERS PROVIDED BY BANK OF AMERICA<br />
END 404 AND 608. I ALSO REQUEST A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO LIMIT PETITIONER'S<br />
ON-GOING DISCOVERY OF MY INFORMATION AND I REQUEST SANCTIONS.<br />
NOTE: To obtain domestic violence restraining orders, you must use the forms Request for Order<br />
(Domestic Violence Prevention) (form DV-100), Temporary Restraining Order (Domestic Violence) (form<br />
DV-110), and Notice of Court Hearing (Domestic Violence) (form DV-109).<br />
FL-300 [Rev. July 1, 2012]<br />
Martin Dean's<br />
ESSENTIAL FORMS-<br />
REQUEST FOR ORDER Page 3 of 4
PETMONER/PLAINTIFF: Ginny L Ca CASE NUMBER:<br />
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: Michael J. Caldwell D 537320 - WHM<br />
OTHER PARENT/PARTY:<br />
FL-300<br />
9. La I request that time for service of the Request for Order and accompanying papers be shortened so that these documents may<br />
be served no less than (specify number):<br />
days before the time set for the hearing. I need <strong>to</strong> have this<br />
order shortening time because of the facts specified in item 10 or the attached declaration.<br />
10. 2:1 FACTS IN SUPPORT of orders requested and change of circumstances for any modification are (specify):<br />
uci Contained in the attached declaration. (You may use Attached Declaration (form MC-031) for this purpose.<br />
The attached declaration must not exceed 10 pages in length, unless permission <strong>to</strong> file a longer declaration has been<br />
obtained from the court.)<br />
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.<br />
Date: DEC 1 8 2012<br />
MARILY1sLANEAKLY<br />
IR<br />
Requests<br />
;TYPE OR PRINT NAME!<br />
(SIGNATURE 0<br />
for Accommodations<br />
Assistive listening systems, computer-assisted real-time captioning, or sign language interpreter services are available if<br />
you ask at least five days before the proceeding. Contact the clerk's office or go <strong>to</strong> wwwcourts.cagovtforms for<br />
Request for Accommodations by Persons With Disabilities and Response (form MC-410). (Civil Code, § 54.8.)<br />
LICANT)<br />
FL-a00 [Rev. July 1, 20121 REQUEST FOR ORDER Page 4 of 4<br />
it l Mara Dear's<br />
ESSENTIM FORMS"
In Re Marriage of Caldwell<br />
Case Number: D537320<br />
Attachment 10 <strong>to</strong> Request for Order Regarding, the <strong>Motion</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quash</strong><br />
and/or for a Protective Order and Sanctions<br />
-Request-<br />
1. I, Marilyn Weakly, request that the court quash the Deposition Subpoenas for<br />
Business Records issued by Petitioner, Ginny L. Edmunds (formerly Caldwell), <strong>to</strong> Bank of<br />
America, in the matter of Ginny L. Caldwell v. Michael J. Caldwell due <strong>to</strong> procedural errors<br />
in issuing and serving the subpoenas, and because the requests are inappropriate and infringe<br />
upon my right <strong>to</strong> privacy. I also seek sanctions <strong>to</strong> cover my legal fees and costs.<br />
-Petitioner Continues To Seek Discovery That Impacts Me<br />
Despite Existing Court Orders Limiting Discovery-<br />
2. On August 30, 2011, at a hearing <strong>to</strong> quash a previous Deposition Subpoena<br />
served on me by Petitioner, the Court limited the information I was required <strong>to</strong> provide<br />
Petitioner.' Among the 20 items Petitioner was requesting, she requested that I produce<br />
records from "any bank accounts in your name alone or held jointly with Michael Caldwell."<br />
At that time the Court limited the documents I was required <strong>to</strong> produce <strong>to</strong> 1) any rent<br />
agreements I had with Respondent and a list of any gifts I received from Respondent<br />
exceeding $2,000 since 2009. I provided the requested information <strong>to</strong> Petitioner on Oc<strong>to</strong>ber<br />
12, 2011.<br />
3. Only two months after the court order limited discovery of my records,<br />
Petitioner issued a Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records <strong>to</strong> Bank of<br />
America. Petitioner did not serve me with a Notice <strong>to</strong> Consumer or the underlying<br />
Deposition Subpoena. On Saturday, November 12, 2011, I learned of this subpoena when<br />
I received correspondence dated November 7, 2011 from Bank of America stating that they<br />
would be producing documents on November 17, 2011. 2 On November 15, 2011, I sent an<br />
2<br />
See Exhibit "A": Notice of <strong>Motion</strong> and <strong>Motion</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quash</strong> dated July 8, 2011.<br />
See Exhibit "B": Correspondence dated November 7, 2011 from Bank of America and <strong>Motion</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>Quash</strong> discovery filed November 15, 2011.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
Objection by Non-Party <strong>to</strong> Production of Business Records and filed a <strong>Motion</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quash</strong> the<br />
discovery issued <strong>to</strong> Bank of America. The court only heard part of the motions connected<br />
<strong>to</strong> this subpoena before Petitioner agreed <strong>to</strong> withdraw her request.<br />
4. I recently received two letters from Bank of America informing me that they<br />
would be producing records unless they receive a court order not <strong>to</strong> do so. While both letters<br />
are dated December 10, 2012, I just received the second letter yesterday, which provides me<br />
little time <strong>to</strong> file this pending motion.' I requested a copy of the subpoenas from the bank<br />
but was <strong>to</strong>ld that I would need <strong>to</strong> ask Petitioner for a copy. My at<strong>to</strong>rney immediately sent a<br />
letter dated December 18, 2012 asking Petitioner <strong>to</strong> withdraw the subpoenas and provide a<br />
copy of the underlying subpoenas. My at<strong>to</strong>rney also sent communication notifying Bank of<br />
America of my objection. 4<br />
-Petitioner's Ongoing Discovery Requests Continue <strong>to</strong> Negatively Impact Me-<br />
5. Petitioner continues <strong>to</strong> bring me in <strong>to</strong> her litigation with Michael Caldwell. In<br />
fact, this discovery is the fourth request sent <strong>to</strong> me in their case. For example, Petitioner<br />
issued the following discovery:<br />
A. On April 7, 2010, Petitioner served me with a Deposition Subpoena for<br />
Personal Appearance and Production of Documents and Things.<br />
Although my personal appearance was not required, Petitioner did not<br />
inform me of this directly. I learned through Respondent's counsel that<br />
a court order negated my need <strong>to</strong> appear;<br />
B. On May 26, 2011, Petitioner issued a Deposition Subpoena for<br />
Production of Business Records <strong>to</strong> me, but failed <strong>to</strong> serve this discovery<br />
with the 15 days required notice. There were also other defects. My<br />
at<strong>to</strong>rney attempted <strong>to</strong> meet and confer unsuccessfully with Petitioner.<br />
This subpoena resulted in my initial <strong>Motion</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quash</strong> and the August<br />
30, 2011 discovery limitation order.<br />
3 See Exhibit "C": Two letters from Bank of America dated December 10, 2012 regarding different<br />
deposition subpoenas issued by Ms. Edmunds.<br />
4<br />
See Exhibit "D": Correspondence dated December 18, 2012 <strong>to</strong> Petitioner and Objection of Non-Party.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
C. As explained above, Petitioner issued a subpoena <strong>to</strong> Bank of America<br />
in November 2011 for which I filed another <strong>Motion</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quash</strong>.<br />
Petitioner agreed <strong>to</strong> withdraw her subpoena before all motions were<br />
heard.<br />
D. Petitioner again issued a subpoena <strong>to</strong> Bank of America without serving<br />
me with the Deposition Subpoena and without providing me with the<br />
Notice <strong>to</strong> Consumer.<br />
6. Petitioner cannot claim that she was unaware that such a request may result in<br />
the production of my records. In her response <strong>to</strong> my request for a civil restraining order,<br />
Petitioner acknowledges that she is aware that her discovery requests <strong>to</strong> Bank of America<br />
have impacted me. Specifically, Petitioner stated, "On one occasion, I sent a subpoena <strong>to</strong><br />
Bank of America <strong>to</strong> obtain bank account information for Michael. Bank of America<br />
complied with the subpoena by sending me bank account information that included Marilyn<br />
Weakly as a joint owner."' Thus, before she issued her subpoena <strong>to</strong> Bank of America,<br />
Petitioner should have sent me a copy of the subpoena along with a Notice <strong>to</strong> Consumer. As<br />
I do not yet have a copy of both subpoenas, I do not know if her request is identical <strong>to</strong> the<br />
discovery I previously objected <strong>to</strong> last year. It is my understanding that both subpoenas may<br />
request information back <strong>to</strong> approximately 2002.<br />
-The Court Granted A Civil Restraining Order Against<br />
Petitioner Due To Her Repeated Harassment-<br />
7. Due <strong>to</strong> Petitioner's ongoing attempts <strong>to</strong> involve me in this case since July 2009,<br />
I filed a motion for a civil restraining order. In addition <strong>to</strong> propounding discovery that<br />
impacted my privacy on four separate occasions, Petitioner sent "warning" letters <strong>to</strong> me. In<br />
July 2009, Petitioner sent me a letter that attacked Respondent and his family under the guise<br />
of "warning" me. 6 The letter is replete with statements such as "I do not want <strong>to</strong> be a sore<br />
in your life. But if he takes my girls, I will be an almost daily part of your lives forever."<br />
Other communication stated, "... I will do anything I legally can <strong>to</strong> make it so your parents,<br />
5<br />
6<br />
See Exhibit "E": See Ms. Edmunds Response <strong>to</strong> Request for Civil Harassment Restraining Orders.<br />
See Documents provided with Exhibit "A", particularly Exhibit C.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
girlfriend and your sister all pay for their part in this scam." See page 10 of Attachment in<br />
Exhibit "E."<br />
8. Shortly after Petitioner sent me this letter, in August 2009 she filed a<br />
declaration in this case raising false allegations against me. Petitioner's father also filed a<br />
declaration falsely accusing me of conduct in September 2009. I could not subject myself<br />
<strong>to</strong> this on an ongoing basis and moved out of my home that I shared with the Respondent.<br />
Respondent began <strong>to</strong> pay me rent. I provided a copy of the rental agreement <strong>to</strong> Petitioner on<br />
Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 12, 2011. There is no need for Petitioner <strong>to</strong> seek my personal records, finances and<br />
information. The discovery propounded is needlessly harassing.<br />
9. Petitioner's conduct escalated when she kept coming <strong>to</strong> my home, staying in<br />
my neighborhood, taking pictures/videos and going through my trash on more than one<br />
occasion. In her response <strong>to</strong> my civil restraining order, Petitioner admitted the following:<br />
A. That she did take videos. Specifically, she stated her excuse as, "I did<br />
take video. It is legal." See page 2 of Exhibit "E."<br />
B. Petitioner walked around my neighborhood and followed Ms. Caldwell.<br />
C. Petitioner admitted coming <strong>to</strong> my house and talking <strong>to</strong> my housekeeper.<br />
See page 11 of Attachment in Exhibit "E."<br />
D. Petitioner admitted <strong>to</strong> two occasions when she searched my trash can.<br />
10. After a hearing and considering all evidence, on July 18, 2012, the court issued<br />
a Civil Harassment Restraining Order After Hearing which protects me for three years.' This<br />
order requires that the Petitioner not harass, intimidate or contact me directly or indirectly.<br />
She is also not able <strong>to</strong> remove trash and recycling materials from refuse and recycling<br />
containers. She must also stay 100 yards away from me, my home, my place of employment<br />
and my vehicle.<br />
11. Notwithstanding this order and prior discovery issues, Petitioner again has<br />
launched discovery which she know will lead <strong>to</strong> a release of my records and information, all<br />
of which she did covertly without complying with discovery requirements.<br />
7 See Exhibit "F" Civil Restraining Order After Hearing issued July 18, 2012.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
-I Have A Right To Privacy and Closure-<br />
12. Additionally, Petitioner is posting private information on a website about my<br />
finances. Specifically, I enclose a prin<strong>to</strong>ut from the website "fixfamilycourtnow.<strong>org</strong> ." 8 This<br />
website includes references <strong>to</strong> bank statements, my motions <strong>to</strong> quash, and my information.<br />
I am concerned about Petitioner having any of my personal information and disclosing it<br />
publically on a website.<br />
-Court Orders & Sanctions-<br />
13. As Petitioner again failed <strong>to</strong> provide advance notice of discovery requests <strong>to</strong><br />
me forcing me <strong>to</strong> incur at<strong>to</strong>rney's fees <strong>to</strong> file an expedited motion, I ask that the court quash<br />
Petitioner's discovery request for my records in it's entirety. At this time, I am aware of two<br />
subpoenas because I received notice from my bank. I do not know if other discovery<br />
requests have been propounded that seek my personal records. The Court has already ruled<br />
on the issue bank or financial statements requested of me.<br />
14. I am not a party <strong>to</strong> the action before the court. This subpoena unnecessarily<br />
infringes upon my privacy. I ask the court <strong>to</strong> again intervene and quash the two Deposition<br />
Subpoenas served on Bank of America as the discovery requests were 1) improperly served<br />
and 2) seek <strong>to</strong> violate my right <strong>to</strong> privacy as a non-party <strong>to</strong> this action. I also ask that the<br />
court sanction Petitioner for failing <strong>to</strong> provide me with a Notice <strong>to</strong> Consumer and copy of the<br />
Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records. My at<strong>to</strong>rney bills at the rate of<br />
$325 hourly. I estimate that I will incur four hours for my at<strong>to</strong>rney <strong>to</strong> review the<br />
correspondence I received, contact Bank of America, prepare the objection <strong>to</strong> Bank of<br />
America, prepare correspondence <strong>to</strong> Petitioner and <strong>to</strong> prepare this motion. I will provide an<br />
update as <strong>to</strong> at<strong>to</strong>rney's fees that I have incurred before the hearing.<br />
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the<br />
foregoing is true and correct. Executed the 18 th of December 2012 in San Diego County.<br />
Signature Via Facsimile<br />
Marilyn Weakly<br />
8<br />
See Exhibit "G": fixfamilycourtnow.<strong>org</strong> prin<strong>to</strong>ut.
-I Have A Right To Privacy and Closure-<br />
12. Additionally, Petitioner is posting private information on a website about my<br />
finances. Specifically, I enclose a prin<strong>to</strong>ut from the website "fixfamilycourtnow.<strong>org</strong> ." 8 This<br />
4 website includes references <strong>to</strong> bank statements, my motions <strong>to</strong> quash, and my information.<br />
5 I am concerned about Petitioner having any of my personal information and disclosing it<br />
6 publically on a website.<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
95<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
-Court Orders & Sanctions-<br />
13. As Petitioner again failed <strong>to</strong> provide advance notice of discovery requests <strong>to</strong><br />
me forcing me <strong>to</strong> incur at<strong>to</strong>rney's fees <strong>to</strong> file an expedited motion, I ask that the court quash<br />
Petitioner's discovery request for my records in it's entirety. At this time, I am aware of two<br />
subpoenas because I received notice from my bank. I do not know if other discovery<br />
requests have been propounded that seek my personal records. The Court has already ruled<br />
on the issue bank or financial statements requested of me.<br />
14. I am not a party <strong>to</strong> the action before the court. This subpoena unnecessarily<br />
infringes upon my privacy. I ask the court <strong>to</strong> again intervene and quash the two Deposition<br />
Subpoenas served on Bank of America as the discovery requests were 1) improperly served<br />
and 2) seek <strong>to</strong> violate my right <strong>to</strong> privacy as a non-party <strong>to</strong> this action. I also ask that the<br />
court sanction Petitioner for failing <strong>to</strong> provide me with a Notice <strong>to</strong> Consumer and copy of the<br />
Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records. My at<strong>to</strong>rney bills at the rate of<br />
$325 hourly. I estimate that I will incur four hours for my at<strong>to</strong>rney <strong>to</strong> review the<br />
correspondence I received, contact Bank of America, prepare the objection <strong>to</strong> Bank of<br />
America, prepare correspondence <strong>to</strong> Petitioner and <strong>to</strong> prepare this motion. I will provide an<br />
update as <strong>to</strong> at<strong>to</strong>rney's fees that I have incurred before the hearing.<br />
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the<br />
foregoing is true and correct. Executed the 1 8 th of December 2012 in San Diego County.<br />
Sec Exhibit "G": fixfarnilycourtnow.<strong>org</strong> prin<strong>to</strong>ut.