20.01.2015 Views

A standardised Systematic Critical Literature Review ... - OpenGrey

A standardised Systematic Critical Literature Review ... - OpenGrey

A standardised Systematic Critical Literature Review ... - OpenGrey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GL6 Panel One : Knowledge Management and Dissemination<br />

Tuesday, 9:00 – 10:00 AM<br />

Chasing the Grey Evidence; A <strong>standardised</strong><br />

<strong>Systematic</strong> <strong>Critical</strong> <strong>Literature</strong> <strong>Review</strong> Approach<br />

J. Knight, G. Reid, P. Simkhada, L. Wyness and L. Mandava<br />

Aberdeen Medical School<br />

This paper advocates that the triangulation of evidence to give a direction for planning should<br />

include the distillation of experience and information that abounds in unpublished reports.<br />

Evaluating complex interventions using only high level of evidence from peer reviewed<br />

published papers may limit the ability to assess effectiveness, however there is a lack of a<br />

standard robust approach to reviewing the grey literature. The way forward is the development<br />

of a ‘<strong>Systematic</strong> <strong>Critical</strong> <strong>Literature</strong> <strong>Review</strong>’ SCLR (which was originally developed for trial data),<br />

applicable to such grey literature, which systematically collates the literature and has a<br />

validated framework to assess the quality of the evidence.<br />

To assess the need for developing a review methodology for grey literature, - a Grey SCLR, a<br />

standard SCLR on published literature on childhood malnutrition in humanitarian complex<br />

emergencies was undertaken and assessed for completion of the evidence base. A mechanism<br />

of systematically collating the grey literature within this subject was developed and yield<br />

assessed. This method was based on standard SCLR methodology and values, and key terms<br />

from a previous standard SCLR on published literature carried out by our research group were<br />

used. Secondary references and expert opinions were also sought. The theoretical quality<br />

assurance literature was reviewed to form a basis towards developing a quality framework<br />

applicable across the different types of un-published reports and studies.<br />

A standard SCLR is theoretically applicable to complex situations. But in such situations an<br />

evidence base cannot be created by even a highly sensitive standard SCLR on published<br />

literature. The majority of information is in the grey literature and a review of such should<br />

have the main values and the key steps equivalent to a standard SCLR for published literature.<br />

Three stages were developed: 1. <strong>Review</strong> of peer-reviewed publications 2. Application of key<br />

words to web based grey literature search; 3.Further refinement of search following<br />

identification of key organisations through stage 2; 4. Search through experts within key<br />

organisations identified. The value of the evidence found was assessed against the stages of<br />

the methodology developed and against the key steps of a standard SCLR.<br />

The theories of quality assurance gave key concepts, which were developed into a quality<br />

framework for the un-published literature. This was then piloted and reliability and context<br />

validity sought.<br />

Grey literature is an essential part of the evidence base for practice in complex interventions,<br />

which may have multi-stakeholders, have multi-variables, have a lack of predictability and<br />

robust data and require a broad literature approach. An outcome from a standard SCLR in such<br />

a complex field is not robust and so this ‘Grey SCLR’ was further developed to increase the<br />

required effectiveness and breadth of a literature review, but based on the objectivity of a<br />

standard SCLR. A developed Grey SCLR should be transferable to inform evaluations of other<br />

complex interventions and can complement a review of the published studies.<br />

64


GL6 Panel One : Knowledge Management and Dissemination<br />

Tuesday, 9:00 – 10:00 AM<br />

Author Information:<br />

Dr. Padam Simkhada (B. Ed., M.Sc., PhD) is working as an International Research Fellow in<br />

the Department of Public Health at the University of Aberdeen UK. Padam graduated from<br />

Tribhuvan University, Nepal. He completed a M.Sc. in Health Promotion from Brunel University,<br />

London in 1999 and PhD from Southampton University UK in 2002. Padam worked for Ministry<br />

of Health in Nepal and Save the Children (UK) for several years. He has long experience in<br />

reproductive and sexual health issues, particularly in the areas of HIV/AIDS.<br />

Padam Simkhada’s main research interest is in international health, working on migration, sex<br />

trafficking and sexual health. He has great interest in the use of grey literature to inform<br />

evidence-based decision-making in the field of emergency nutrition. He is convener of<br />

International Health Interest Group in Aberdeen.<br />

Dr. Jane Knight (BSc, MB ChB, MPH, MFPHM) trained as a Consultant in Public Health<br />

Medicine in Scotland. Her background includes National Health Service Board research. She<br />

now holds a joint post for food borne disease and nutrition as Clinical Senior Lecturer at the<br />

University of Aberdeen and Public Health Medical Advisor for the Food Standards Agency<br />

Scotland. In addition she is an Honorary Consultant at the Scottish Centre for Infections and<br />

Environmental Health.<br />

The combination of an academic approach to service lead research, and training in public<br />

health disaster relief has resulted in a developing public health epidemiological research<br />

portfolio in malnutrition in complex emergencies. Jane leads a research group Partners<br />

Research Emergency Nutrition PREN, collaborating with humanitarian Non Government<br />

Organisations. From her research experience assessing evidence required for policy decisions<br />

within complex situations, both within UK and in the international humanitarian field, her<br />

research work now has a focus on methodological development required for assessing the<br />

evidence from the grey literature.<br />

Laura Wyness (BSc, MSc) graduated with a BSc Health Sciences degree from the University<br />

of Aberdeen in 2000. Following this she worked as a Research Assistant on several systematic<br />

reviews and trials within the Health Economics Research Unit (HERU) and the Health Services<br />

Research Unit (HSRU) at the University of Aberdeen.<br />

Laura gained an MSc in Public Health & Health Services Research (with distinction) in 2003<br />

from the University of Aberdeen. Her MSc dissertation, carried out within the PREN group<br />

(Partners for Research into Emergency Nutrition) was on “developing an evidence-based tool<br />

for redefining an approach to severe malnutrition in complex emergencies”.<br />

In 2003 she was awarded an MRC (Medical Research Council) scholarship to carry out a PhD in<br />

the Public Health Department, University of Aberdeen. The PhD is being carried out in the area<br />

of severe adult malnutrition in complex emergencies.<br />

Address:<br />

Dr. Jane Knight<br />

Univeristy of Aberdeen<br />

Public Health Medical Advisor Food Standards Agency Scotland<br />

Public Health, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill<br />

Aberdeen AB25 2ZD<br />

United Kingdom<br />

j.knight@abdn.ac.uk<br />

www.abdn.ac.uk/public_health.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!