20.01.2015 Views

Ngwenyama v Mayelane wedding after customary wedding

Ngwenyama v Mayelane wedding after customary wedding

Ngwenyama v Mayelane wedding after customary wedding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

21<br />

must be registered in terms of s 4 of the Act. Sect ion 4(9) makes it clear<br />

though that failure to register a <strong>customary</strong> marriag e does not per se affect the<br />

validity of that marriage.<br />

[34] Section 6, which appears to 'usher in a remedi al regime of equal worth<br />

and capacity of spouses in <strong>customary</strong> marriages’ ( Gumede para 25),<br />

provides:<br />

'A wife in a <strong>customary</strong> marriage has, on the basis o f equality with her husband<br />

and subject to the matrimonial property system gove rning the marriage, full<br />

status and capacity, including the capacity to acqu ire assets and to dispose of<br />

them, to enter into contracts and to litigate, in a ddition to any rights and<br />

powers that she might have at <strong>customary</strong> law.'<br />

And finally, s 7(6), which applies to marriages con cluded <strong>after</strong> the Act came<br />

into force and which is located in that part of the Act headed: 'Proprietary<br />

consequences of <strong>customary</strong> marriages and contractual capacity of spouses',<br />

provides:<br />

'A husband in a <strong>customary</strong> marriage who wishes to en ter into a further<br />

<strong>customary</strong> marriage with another woman <strong>after</strong> the com mencement of this Act<br />

must make an application to the court to approve a written contract which will<br />

regulate the future matrimonial property system of his marriages.'<br />

[35] The Recognition Act has to be interpreted in a manner that promotes<br />

the spirit, purport and objects of our Bill of Righ ts. This duty is one in respect<br />

of which 'no court has a discretion' ( Phumelela Gaming and Leisure Ltd v<br />

Grünlingh and others 2007 (6) SA 350 (CC) para 26 and 27). In Brink v<br />

Kitshoff NO 1996 (4) SA 197 (CC) para 44, O’Regan J had this t o say:<br />

'Although in our society discrimination on grounds of sex has not been as<br />

visible, nor as widely condemned, as discrimination on grounds of race, it has<br />

nevertheless resulted in deep patterns of disadvant age. These patterns of<br />

disadvantage are particularly acute in the case of black women, as race and<br />

gender discrimination overlap. That all such discri mination needs to be<br />

eradicated from our society is a key message of the Constitution. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!