20.01.2015 Views

The structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a ...

The structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a ...

The structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5 – Relative abundance <strong>of</strong> the three dom<strong>in</strong>ant groups <strong>and</strong> the most abundant species <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>beetle</strong>s <strong>in</strong><br />

the light trap samples <strong>in</strong> 2002–2006.<br />

2002 (n=1,006) 2003 (n=7,578) 2004 (n=8,713) 2005 (n=3,283) 2006 (n=8,670)<br />

Dytiscidae 53.42% 15.74% 8.52% 23.03% 6.58%<br />

Ilybius fulig<strong>in</strong>osus 33.02% 5.52% 2.10% 1.81% 1.07%<br />

Ilybius ater 8.74% 5.02% 0.47% 1.07% 1.37%<br />

Rhantus suturalis 4.63% 3.77% 0.87% 0.27% 2.32%<br />

Ilybius subtilis 3.18% 0.03% 1.50% 18.98% 0.34%<br />

Hydrophiloidea 18.97% 76.56% 80.71% 62.94% 75.99%<br />

Hydrobius fuscipes 10.61% 68.40% 66.08% 44.53% 62.16%<br />

Enochrus coarctatus 6.37% 5.04% 7.78% 14.14% 6.81%<br />

Anacaena lutescens 0.41% 2.35% 5.64% 3.51% 1.61%<br />

Enochrus quadripunctatus 0.00% 0.13% 0.35% 0.30% 3.91%<br />

Scirtidae 27.50% 7.70% 10.52% 13.76% 17.23%<br />

Cyphon variabilis 12.36% 1.32% 5.06% 0.73% 4.42%<br />

Cyphon coarctatus 7.85% 2.33% 0.47% 0.27% 0.49%<br />

Cyphon ochraceus 2.89% 0.46% 0.46% 8.41% 9.95%<br />

Cyphon padi 1.81% 3.42% 4.42% 2.89% 1.49%<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> weather <strong>and</strong> <strong>water</strong> depth on flight activity<br />

<strong>The</strong> aggregated weekly flight activity (‘seasonal aspect’) is <strong>in</strong>fluenced by air<br />

temperature <strong>and</strong> <strong>water</strong> depth <strong>in</strong> the wetl<strong>and</strong> (Fig. 13 <strong>and</strong> Table 6). No significant effect <strong>of</strong><br />

other variables or seasonal patterns that cannot be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by temperature <strong>and</strong> <strong>water</strong> depth<br />

were detected (Table 6). A threshold temperature is apparent <strong>in</strong> all groups (Fig. 14). <strong>The</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum temperatures required for flight, as found by threshold additive models, were<br />

13.5°C (all families), 15.8°C (Dytiscidae), 17.7°C (Hydrophiloidea), <strong>and</strong> 12.1°C (Scirtidae).<br />

Several <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>of</strong> all three groups were, however, caught even at temperatures below 10<br />

°C.<br />

Short-term fluctuations <strong>of</strong> the flight activity can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by fluctuations <strong>of</strong> air<br />

temperature (Fig. 15 <strong>and</strong> Table 7). <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> cloud coverage <strong>in</strong> the Hydrophiloidea <strong>and</strong><br />

Scirtidae was also significant but very weak.<br />

Fig. 13 – <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> environmental variables on the seasonal aspects <strong>of</strong> the flight activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>beetle</strong>s<br />

(fitted values with 95% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval).<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!